#precalculus

1 messages · Page 210 of 1

harsh cipher
#

Then used double angle identity tangent

uncut mulch
#

what's your tan(x)

harsh cipher
#

-sqrt(21)/2

uncut mulch
#

what's the first thing you got after applying the dbl angle identity

harsh cipher
#

(-2sqrt(21)/2) / (1)+(21/2)

willow bear
#

parentheses fuckup again

harsh cipher
#

llollllll

#

where?

uncut mulch
#

around the denominator which is also wrong (even if there were parentheses)

willow bear
#

this reads as $\frac{-\frac{2\sqrt{21}}{2}}{1} + \frac{21}{2}$

obsidian monolithBOT
harsh cipher
#

oh yeah that's wrong

willow bear
#

i'm tempted to make a problem set which has formulas written in plaintext and asks students to determine their correct translation to proper mathematical text

harsh cipher
#

using what

willow bear
#

LaTeX

harsh cipher
#

ok so then...why is my denom wrong

#

ohhh

#

denom is

#

1-(21/4) ?

uncut mulch
#

that's better

harsh cipher
#

oh wait

#

denom has to be 1-(-21/4)?

#

other wise I get -4sqrt(21)/17 as my final answer

uncut mulch
#

when i said "that's better", i implied that you had it right

harsh cipher
#

hmm okay

uncut mulch
#

how are you getting -4sqrt(21)/17?

harsh cipher
#

(-2sqrt(21)/2)/(-17/4)

#

oh no

#

-8sqrt(21)/(-34)

#

is 4sqrt(21)/17

uncut mulch
#

a little inefficient but you got there 🙂

harsh cipher
#

haha

#

yes!

#

thank you for the help

#

the parentheses thing actually helps

#

hahahaha

uncut mulch
#

something like -2sqrt(21)/2 can be simplified to -sqrt(21) a lot earlier

harsh cipher
#

right, but I'm not at that stage yet. I will get used to doing that in the future.

#

Thanks!!!

#

@willow bear Thanks!

viscid thistle
#

Tan(3a)^2(1+cos(6a)) what should i do first? Open the brackets by multiplying?
Or use tan(3a)^2 as sin(3a)^2/cos(3a)^2 ?

uncut mulch
#

consider simplifying (1+cos(6a)) first

eternal flume
#

Hello, how can I solve this equation?
sin2x = tgx
I was able to calculate this
sinx (2cos^2(x) - 1) = 0
, but I do not know how to continue.

viscid thistle
#

Simplified it should be 1+cos(3a)^2-sin(3a)^2.
Rearrange: 1-sin(3a)^2+cos(3a)^2=cos(3a)^2+cos(3a)^2=2cos(3a)^2
From tan(3a)^2=》sin(3a)^2/cos(3a)^2 × 2cos(3a)^2=sin(3a)^2×cos(3a)^2=2sin(3a/2)^2×2cos(3a/2)^2=(1-cos(3a))(1+cos(3a)=1+cos(3a)-cos(3a)-cos(3a)^2=1-cos(3a)^2

Thats the answer I got. Correct answer should be 1-cos(6a). Can somebody tell me where i went wrong

warped dagger
#

Why is x (va) = 1, x = 2, & x = 4, i just dont understand how he got those values?

jagged glade
#

@warped dagger do you understand what does log with base 3 means?

warped dagger
#

Yes, i do

willow bear
#

@warped dagger the other two are just easy-to-plot points on a set of axes

warped dagger
#

my bad, brainfart

jagged glade
#

No problem😀

harsh cipher
#

Hi

#

Question

#

-(csc^2x)= (2)/(cos2x-1)

#

left side is equal to (-1)/(sin^2x)

#

the right side

#

(2)/((1-2sin^2x)-1))

#

,help

obsidian monolithBOT
#

A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs! Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!

serene heath
#

@harsh cipher yes

harsh cipher
#

@serene heath ty

harsh cipher
#

Hi, question again

#

cos(2x) = 1-(tan^2x)/(1+tan^2x)

#

then I have cos^2(x)-sin^2(x)/ cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)

#

which is Cos^2(x)-sin^2(x) /1

#

which is equal to Cos2(x)

#

left side = right side

tacit bane
#

Can anyone explain how to find the intervals of increase in this graph?

#

Of 1/h(x)

fleet yew
#

@tacit bane where is the function increasing

tacit bane
#

in 1/h(x) i see it increasing at the end behaviour at the left and between asymptote +1 and +3

#

reason i asked is because if i were to write it for h(x), lets say at point -2; (+infinity,-2)

#

but i dont know how to write it for 1/h(x)

fleet yew
#

@tacit bane i want you to put dots on all the bumps in the graph

#

Lets just look at h(x) for now

#

Because i dont think you understand what increasing means

tacit bane
#

Sorry I messed up I assumed anything above the x axis is increasing

#

I have drawn arrows at where I think it is increasing

fleet yew
#

Yes thats right

#

Yeah dont confuse positive with increasing lol

#

I used to do that a lot

tacit bane
#

i think i figured it out for 1/h(x)...so between asymptote -2 and 1 there is a bump. so (-2+1)/2 is the point at which it will increase then decrease?

patent beacon
#

If h is increasing, what is 1/h doing?

tacit bane
#

i think it also increases?

fleet yew
#

Draw arrows

#

Along the path of the function

#

You can think of increasing as "going up"

patent beacon
#

When h gets large, 1/h gets smaller. It's actually the opposite. 1/h is increasing when h is decreasing

tacit bane
#

Oh so @patent beacon is my graph for h(x) wrong?

#

@fleet yew i drew the arrows in orange

fleet yew
#

Wait this is a different function

#

One problem at a time lol

tacit bane
#

sorry i drew it for 1/h(x)

patent beacon
#

Oh mb. I see, you drew 1/h for the graph h to the right there

tacit bane
#

1/h(x) graph i mean @patent beacon

#

is it right?

patent beacon
#

So when h is negative, 1/h will be too. Check your signs

#

You have the right idea to set the asymptotes to 0

tacit bane
#

@fleet yew so did i understand increasing function yet?

#

oh so can you please pin point where i was wrong?

#

@patent beacon

patent beacon
#

You've correctly identified the increasing intervals on the graph you drew.

Your 1/h should always have the same sign as h

tacit bane
#

i assumed that the bumps would flip except for the end behaviour

patent beacon
#

At x = 0 for example. The two graphs have different signs, which is wrong

tacit bane
#

ohhh

#

okay i understand

patent beacon
#

But the idea is right, otherwise

tacit bane
#

Now?

patent beacon
#

Wait, which one are you supposed to set? Lol

tacit bane
#

the graph for h(x)

patent beacon
#

But yes that looks much better

tacit bane
#

oh, is there something that i must fix? when you asked which one i was supposed to set?

patent beacon
#

I assumed you were given h, and had to graph 1/h

#

Yeah, nvm I'm getting loopy

tacit bane
#

ah yes, i was given h(x) and i had to draw 1/h(x)

#

thanks so much! @fleet yew and @patent beacon

fleet yew
#

@tacit bane no problem

#

Just remember for the love of God

tacit bane
#

yes increasing is not the same as above the x axis

fleet yew
#

Do not confuse "positive" with "increasing"

#

Or "negative" with "decreasing"

tacit bane
#

i had a feeling you would say that

fleet yew
#

Yeah im just projecting i guess

#

Because i made that mistake like a million times myself back in alg 1

tacit bane
#

thanks so much! i learnt something very important today

fleet yew
#

👍

harsh cipher
#

Hi

#

I have a question.

fleet yew
#

I have an answer

harsh cipher
#

lol

#

okay let me write the question

fleet yew
#

Provided that your question is within the scope of my knowledge

#

Which is fairly likely considering that this is the precalc channel

harsh cipher
#

(2cosx)/(sec^2x) = (1+cos2x)/(secx)

vernal moon
#

ya

#

whats the question

harsh cipher
#

can i write either side of the equation

#

in fraction form?

vernal moon
#

uh what

harsh cipher
#

I can only write the answer in identity form

fleet yew
#

$\frac{2cosx}{sec^2x}= \frac{1+cos2x}{secx}$

harsh cipher
#

(cosx)(1+cos2x)

obsidian monolithBOT
vernal moon
#

identity form?

fleet yew
#

Is this what you mean

#

Just being clear

#

Or do you mean cos^2x

vernal moon
#

i think cos(2x)

stuck lark
#

$\frac{2\cos(x)}{\sec^2(x)}= \frac{1+\cos(2x)}{\sec(x)}$

obsidian monolithBOT
fleet yew
#

How do you make it black

stuck lark
#

,tex --color

obsidian monolithBOT
#

Valid colour schemes are: transparent, trans_black, trans_white, default, gray, darkgrey, light, grey, black, white, dark

vernal moon
#

also why does he have an aleph in his name

fleet yew
#

Bro thats flipping my text input

#

It is weird

vernal moon
#

lmao

#

it makes sense

#

hebrew is right to left

fleet yew
#

But i dont like it

harsh cipher
#

okay so

fleet yew
#

What

harsh cipher
#

is there another proof

fleet yew
#

$\frac{2\cos(x)}{\sec^2(x)}= \frac{1+\cos(2x)}{\sec(x)}$

obsidian monolithBOT
fleet yew
#

Is this the equation

harsh cipher
#

yes

fleet yew
#

What are you trying to do

#

Prove the identity?

harsh cipher
#

yes

#

this is a question from double angle identities

fleet yew
#

@harsh cipher

#

Multtiply both sides by secx

harsh cipher
#

ok

#

okay I couldn't get the answer

#

1 more question

#

2/((-cos(x)/(sinx)) + ((sin(x)/cos(x))

#

$2\frac{-cosx/sinx}+{sin(x)/cos(x)}$

obsidian monolithBOT
harsh cipher
#

oh no

#

lollllll

#

$\frac{2/(-cosx/sinx}+\frac{sinx/cosx}$

obsidian monolithBOT
harsh cipher
#

hmmm

#

$\frac{2

#

$\frac{2}/frac{-cosx/sinx)}$

obsidian monolithBOT
willow bear
#

$\frac{2}{\frac{-\cos(x)}{\sin(x)}}$

obsidian monolithBOT
willow bear
#

is this what you were attempting to write @harsh cipher

harsh cipher
#

yes

#

not complete, but yea

#

I've been trying to solve this for the last 2 hours

#

$\frac{2}{\frac{-\cos(x)}{\sin(x)}}+{\frac{sinx}{\cos(x)}}$

obsidian monolithBOT
harsh cipher
#

oh no

#

lol

#

hmmm

willow bear
#

uhh

#

$\frac{2}{\frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)}-\frac{\cos(x)}{\sin(x)}}$

obsidian monolithBOT
willow bear
#

i take it you rewrote the RHS as this?

harsh cipher
#

yes

#

but can you explain why you changed -cot(x) to positive

willow bear
#

what

harsh cipher
#

oh no you didn't nm

willow bear
#

anyway, did i understand correctly that in those two hours it did not occur to you that this is a nested fraction and as such it would help to multiply the outer num and denom by sin(x)cos(x) to get rid of the inner denominators?

#

to make it not a nested fraction anymore?

harsh cipher
#

it did but I could not simplify properly

willow bear
#

but what did you get upon doing that?

harsh cipher
#

something crazy

willow bear
#

can you show me what the "something crazy" is

harsh cipher
#

-cos(x)cos(x)/sin(x)sin(x) + sin(x)sin(x)/sin(x)cos(x)

willow bear
#

... what.

#

can you write that down on paper or something

vernal moon
#

Or latex

alpine narwhal
#

i think he meant to group the last two expressions

#

-cos^2(x)

willow bear
#

you should have gotten $\frac{2\sin(x)\cos(x)}{(\frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)}-\frac{\cos(x)}{\sin(x)})\sin(x)\cos(x)}$ prior to further simplification

alpine narwhal
#

divided by (sin^2(x)-cos^2(x))/sinxcosx

obsidian monolithBOT
willow bear
#

and the denominator SHOULD have rather obviously transformed itself into sin^2(x) - cos^2(x)

#

but something prevented you from doing what at least in retrospect ought to seem like a natural sequence of algebraic moves to get to this point

harsh cipher
#

okay

#

hmm

#

i got that

#

but what I did was since there was 2 in the numerator

willow bear
#

you wrote the 2 as 2(cos^2(x)+sin^2(x))?

harsh cipher
#

lolllllll

#

ahahahha

#

okay

#

then we have 2/sin(x)cos(x)?

willow bear
#

no?

harsh cipher
#

why?

willow bear
#

why would we.

harsh cipher
#

denom cancels sin(x) in the numerator?

willow bear
#

what.

#

are you trying to cancel the $\sin(x)\cos(x)$ in $\frac{2\sin(x)\cos(x)}{(\frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)}-\frac{\cos(x)}{\sin(x)})\sin(x)\cos(x)}$

obsidian monolithBOT
harsh cipher
#

yes

alpine narwhal
#

i’ll stop you there

harsh cipher
#

okay

willow bear
#

...

#

congratulations

harsh cipher
#

........

willow bear
#

you've tried to UNDO MY LAST STEP.

harsh cipher
#

LOLLLLLLLL

alpine narwhal
#

thats what i was tryna say

#

lmao

#

you know why you multiply the numerator and denominator by sinxcosx?

harsh cipher
#

no

alpine narwhal
#

well how are you going to condense the denominator?

harsh cipher
#

by multiplying ?

alpine narwhal
#

by?

harsh cipher
#

sinxcosx

alpine narwhal
#

yes

#

but whatever you do to the denom

#

you must do to the numerator

harsh cipher
#

did not know that

alpine narwhal
#

keep it equal

harsh cipher
#

I think there was an explanation about adding fractions with binomial denom

willow bear
#

i was not doing any fraction addition

alpine narwhal
#

whoops

willow bear
#

also

#

but whatever you do to the denom
you must do to the numerator
this is vague and misleading

alpine narwhal
#

sorry bout that
i meant whatever you multiply the denom by you must multiply the numerator by

willow bear
#

yes, and THAT'S WHAT I DID, and i tried to make it explicit

#

but failed to do so i guess

alpine narwhal
#

man im sorry im bad at this

harsh cipher
#

so.....

willow bear
#

aleph-ewb64, do you understand how i went from $\frac{2}{\frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)}-\frac{\cos(x)}{\sin(x)}}$ to $\frac{2\sin(x)\cos(x)}{(\frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)}-\frac{\cos(x)}{\sin(x)})\sin(x)\cos(x)}$?

obsidian monolithBOT
harsh cipher
#

yes you mutlipled, cos(x)sin(x)

#

to the numerator

undone pawn
#

$a = a\cdot 1 = a \cdot \frac{b} {b} = \frac{ab} {b} $

obsidian monolithBOT
undone pawn
#

for non zero b

willow bear
#

no, i multiplied THE NUMERATOR AND THE DENOMINATOR by cos(x)sin(x)

harsh cipher
#

and then... you multiple sin(x) (cos)x to each fraction with different denom

undone pawn
#

what

harsh cipher
#

in the bottom

willow bear
#

and then i SIMPLIFIED THE DENOMINATOR

harsh cipher
#

yes

willow bear
#

by EXPANDING and CANCELING

harsh cipher
#

yes

willow bear
#

do you understand how $\paren{\frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)} - \frac{\cos(x)}{\sin(x)}}\sin(x)\cos(x)$ simplifies to $\sin^2(x)-\cos^2(x)$?

obsidian monolithBOT
willow bear
#

yes or no

harsh cipher
#

yes

#

I can do that

willow bear
#

okay great

#

so now

#

we have

#

2sin(x)cos(x)/(sin^2(x)-cos^2(x))

#

do you see how to proceed from here

harsh cipher
#

No

willow bear
#

look at the numerator

#

what can it be rewritten as

harsh cipher
#

hmmmm

alpine narwhal
#

take a look at your trig identities

harsh cipher
#

is there an identity there?

willow bear
#

you either know it or you don't

#

consider what your goal is.

harsh cipher
#

I don't know

willow bear
#

-tan(2x)

#

bolded on purpose

harsh cipher
#

I still don't know

alpine narwhal
#

should tell you what identity to look for

harsh cipher
#

oh

willow bear
#

does this not scream "double angle identities"

alpine narwhal
#

try looking there

harsh cipher
#

sin2(x)/cos2(x)?

#

ummm

willow bear
alpine narwhal
#

boiling hot

willow bear
#

never write "sin2(x)"

harsh cipher
#

cos2(x)

#

ok

willow bear
#

or "cos2(x)"

#

the numerator is just sin(2x).

vernal moon
#

oml

alpine narwhal
#

wait

#

nvm

#

dont mind that

willow bear
#

the denominator is not cos(2x)

alpine narwhal
#

im an idiot

#

did your simplifying wrong

harsh cipher
#

okay

#

I'm not sure what -tan(2x)

#

I don't know what -tan(2x) is

alpine narwhal
#

well

willow bear
#

-tan(2x) is -tan(2x)

alpine narwhal
#

you were there

#

just think

willow bear
#

@harsh cipher tell me, what double angle identities do you know of

#

urgh

#

the fucking aleph you insist on having in your name

undone pawn
#

$\sin(2x) = 2\cdot\sin x\cdot \cos x$

obsidian monolithBOT
undone pawn
#

there's no way to proceed unless you know this

harsh cipher
#

well I know the sin identity and the other cos identities

alpine narwhal
#

well

undone pawn
#

you dont know this one?

#

that I wrote?

alpine narwhal
#

you did your simplifying wrong

undone pawn
#

well you know sin(x+y) right

#

just sub in x=y in that

harsh cipher
#

i know that one

alpine narwhal
#

lets take a look at the denominator

willow bear
#

cos(2x) = cos^2(x) - sin^2(x)
do you not know this one

harsh cipher
#

i know that one too

undone pawn
#

similarly for cos(x+y)

alpine narwhal
#

well

undone pawn
#

oh

alpine narwhal
#

take a look at your denominator

willow bear
#

and if you do then how can you simplify sin^2(x) - cos^2(x)

harsh cipher
#

sin(2x)

willow bear
#

WHAT THE FUCK

harsh cipher
#

i mean

#

cos(2x)

#

lol

willow bear
#

NO

undone pawn
#

lmao

#

no

alpine narwhal
#

i got this

willow bear
#

NO

#

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

undone pawn
#

chilll

alpine narwhal
#

here here

#

we got this

#

take a breather

undone pawn
#

yeah

harsh cipher
#

LMAO

willow bear
#

yknow that part in bohemian rhapsody

#

"no, no, no, NO, NO, NO, NO!!!"

#

that's me rn

vernal moon
#

mama mia mama mia

willow bear
#

cos(2x) = cos^2(x) - sin^2(x)

sin^2(x) - cos^2(x) = ????

alpine narwhal
#

rewrite the expression

harsh cipher
#

cos(2x)?

vernal moon
#

oml

willow bear
#

NO!!!!

harsh cipher
#

why

willow bear
#

IT'S NOT cos(2x)!!!

harsh cipher
#

hahahahahaha

willow bear
#

SUBTRACTION ISN'T COMMUTATIVE!!!! WHY WOULD YOU THINK IT IS!!!

alpine narwhal
#

rewrite sin^2(x)-cos^2(x)

willow bear
#

X-Y IS NOT THE SAME AS Y-X!!!!!!!

alpine narwhal
#

what do you notice about y=x-1 and y=1-x?

harsh cipher
#

they are not the same

vernal moon
#

..

alpine narwhal
#

well

harsh cipher
#

hold on let me rewrite Ann's question first

undone pawn
#

$8-3\neq 3-8$

obsidian monolithBOT
alpine narwhal
#

5 is not -5

undone pawn
#

indeed it is not

alpine narwhal
#

now

vernal moon
#

but do you see a similarity between em..

harsh cipher
#

no

vernal moon
#

5 and -5

harsh cipher
#

5 does not equal -5

vernal moon
#

yes but

alpine narwhal
#

what do you notice about their relationship

vernal moon
#

ok listen if a-b=k what does b-a equal

alpine narwhal
#

here

willow bear
#

k

alpine narwhal
#

tryn so hard not to laugh

#

okay

#

gamemode back on

undone pawn
#

xD

#

cmon lmao shouldn't make fun

alpine narwhal
#

i cant help it

#

im on the ground

harsh cipher
#

same

#

hahahahahahha

alpine narwhal
#

okay now

#

you can rewrite 1-x as -x+1, right?

harsh cipher
#

yea

vernal moon
#

ok

#

thats progress

willow bear
#

-cos(2x). it's fucking,,,
MINUS cos(2x).
seriously, i am surprisappointed that this is even an issue.

alpine narwhal
#

me too

#

but

vernal moon
#

surprisappointed

#

thats an unexpected portmanteu

alpine narwhal
#

anyways

#

now that’s done

harsh cipher
#

okay....its -cos(2x)

alpine narwhal
#

you see how to get to -tan(2x)?

#

you have your numerator

#

sin(2x)

#

and your denominator

#

-cos(2x)

#

one more step

harsh cipher
#

okay

willow bear
#

still like

#

bruh

alpine narwhal
#

me too

willow bear
alpine narwhal
#

i am assuming you got your answer

harsh cipher
#

no way

alpine narwhal
#

is that a joke or

#

an exclamation

vernal moon
#

...

alpine narwhal
#

please tell me its an exclamation

willow bear
#

$\frac{\sin(2x)}{-\cos(2x)}$

obsidian monolithBOT
willow bear
#

come on. one last step.

#

you can do it.

alpine narwhal
#

what else can you write -tan(2x) as?

harsh cipher
#

-sin(2x)/cos(2x)

willow bear
#

this is basic algebra man

harsh cipher
#

no?NO!?

#

plz don't say oml.....

willow bear
#

yes -tan(2x) = -sin(2x)/cos(2x)

#

but like

#

bruh. algebra 101

harsh cipher
#

thank you all

alpine narwhal
#

no problem

harsh cipher
#

really appreciate the help.

alpine narwhal
#

thank @willow bear

willow bear
#

well thank you for that incredibly sarcastic remark

#

:|

alpine narwhal
#

i mean literally

#

i shouldve said shoutout

#

but

harsh cipher
#

did you really fall on the ground laughing though

willow bear
#

i was talking about aleph-ewb's remark

alpine narwhal
#

oh

#

and yes

harsh cipher
#

hahaha

alpine narwhal
#

if a-b=k

harsh cipher
#

laughing is the best medicine

alpine narwhal
#

then b-a is

harsh cipher
#

-k

vernal moon
#

yay

alpine narwhal
#

okay at least you learned something today

#

congrats

#

you get a medal

harsh cipher
#

lmao but Flynn's explanation nailed it for me

#

somewhere up there

undone pawn
alpine narwhal
#

the a1=a(b/b)?

harsh cipher
#

what?

alpine narwhal
#

nvm

undone pawn
#

8-3 I guess

harsh cipher
#

lmao

alpine narwhal
#

LOL

harsh cipher
#

ahhahahaaha

alpine narwhal
#

i asked my dad that question

#

what is 8-3

#

5

#

what is 3-8

#

5

undone pawn
#

maybe he thought |3-8|

alpine narwhal
#

i lost it there and i was laughing so hard

undone pawn
#

some people have absolute values turned on by default

#

xP

willow bear
alpine narwhal
#

odd

#

but still

#

i explained it to him once more and then he said -5

#

this was fun

#

i wanna do it again

harsh cipher
#

okay I have a lot more, i'll be here for the next 5 years

undone pawn
#

lmao

harsh cipher
#

I mean eventually I'll get better but it could be just as exciting as the previous one 😛

alpine narwhal
#

im looking forward to that

viscid thistle
#

i feel like i missed some fun stuff

alpine narwhal
#

yes you did

#

bro you should’ve seen everything that went down

viscid thistle
#

Can i write 2cot(a/2) as 2cot(a/2)/2sin(a/2)?

#

Lasg one is supposed to be cos over sin

uncut mulch
#

$2\cot(\frac a2) \umwhat \frac{2 \cos(\frac a2)}{2 \sin(\frac a2)}$

obsidian monolithBOT
uncut mulch
#

$2\cot(\frac a2) \umwhat \frac{2 \cos(\frac a2)}{2}\cdot \sin(\frac a2)$

obsidian monolithBOT
uncut mulch
#

no

viscid thistle
#

Can i write it as something else?

uncut mulch
#

you could write it in terms of sin and cos,
but for you had and extra 2

#

2/2 = 1

viscid thistle
#

Sorry i dont understand .
My problem is $\frac{2 \cos(\frac a2)sin (\frac 2a 2)}{cos a}

#

$\frac{2 \cos(\frac a2)sin (\frac 2a 2)}{cos a}

uncut mulch
#

needs $ on both sides

viscid thistle
#

$\frac{2 \cos(\frac a2)sin (\frac 2a 2)}{cos a}$

obsidian monolithBOT
viscid thistle
#

Its sin(2a/2)

#

Fucked up

uncut mulch
#

do you have a pic of the question?

#

$\frac{2 \cos(\frac a2)\sin (\frac{2a}{2})}{\cos a} ?$

obsidian monolithBOT
viscid thistle
#

Im supposed to simplify

uncut mulch
#

the 2a/2 looks very suspicious

#

and how is this related to your question about cot

viscid thistle
#

If i can make sin (2a/2) into sin(a)
And 2cos(a/2) into cos(a). Then i gave the correct answer. But i dont know if i can manipulate it like that

#

Damn

uncut mulch
#

2cos(a/2) into cos(a)

#

no

#

$a \cdot f(x) \not\equiv f(ax)$

viscid thistle
#

$\frac{2 \cot(\frac a2)sin (\frac (2a)(2))}{cos a}$

obsidian monolithBOT
uncut mulch
#

$\frac{2 \cot(\frac a2) \cdot \sin (\frac{2a}{2})}{\cos a} ?$

#

is that the ORIGINAL expression?

viscid thistle
#

Cos is cot

#

And sin(2a/2)

#

Upper one is cot

#

Lower is cos.

obsidian monolithBOT
viscid thistle
#

Yes

#

J think i have to manipulate cot somehow

uncut mulch
#

and are you 100% certain that the question actually says "2a/2" inside the sin?

viscid thistle
#

100% staring at me in the book

#

Photomath says its equal to sin(a)

uncut mulch
#

well yeh. 2a/2 = a
and sin(2a/2) = sin(a)

#

which gets you: $\frac{2 \cot(\frac a2) \cdot \sin (a)}{\cos(a)} $

obsidian monolithBOT
uncut mulch
#

and you can simplify the sin(a)/cos(a) to tan(a)

#

to get: $2\cot(\frac a2)\tan(a)$

obsidian monolithBOT
uncut mulch
#

what's the final answer supposed to be?

#

and or take a picture of both

viscid thistle
#

Tan(a)

uncut mulch
#

yeh, please take a picture of the question

viscid thistle
uncut mulch
#

from what's being given, i highly suspect there's some sort of major misprint

viscid thistle
#

The third one

#

So far I'm running into problems with all of them.

uncut mulch
#

questions fked

viscid thistle
#

Hmm, ok

uncut mulch
#

as i suspected, if they actually gave you something like
sin(2a/2) something is very wrong

viscid thistle
#

Can i manipulate the cot somehow?

uncut mulch
#

you could write it as

#

$\cot(\frac a2) = \frac{\cos( \frac a2)}{\sin( \frac a2)} \ \
2\cot(\frac a2) = \frac{2\cos( \frac a2)}{\sin( \frac a2)}$

#

but that doesn't really help

viscid thistle
#

Isnt that just cot(a/2). What happens to the 2?

uncut mulch
#

you only asked about the cot

viscid thistle
#

Ok, i see

obsidian monolithBOT
viscid thistle
#

Ok. I think i solved it as the book gives it.

uncut mulch
#

what does the book actually say?

viscid thistle
#

That simplified it should be tan(a)

#

Assuming i can make sin(a) into 2sin(a/2)

uncut mulch
#

no\

viscid thistle
#

Then fuck :D

uncut mulch
#

$a \cdot f(x) \not\equiv f(ax)$

obsidian monolithBOT
uncut mulch
#

as i mentioned earlier

#

the question if fked

willow bear
#

he tried to replace sin(2a) with 2sin(a) the other day

uncut mulch
#

sin(2a/2)/cos(a) already simplifies to tan(a)

#

which gets you: $2\cot(\frac a2)\tan(a)$

obsidian monolithBOT
viscid thistle
#

Yeah, im having a hard time with that particularity

uncut mulch
#

and IF you somehow got the books answer from the initial expression

#

then it means you're essentially implying that 2cot(a/2) = 1

#

the point is the question is completely fked

#

the typo is so major that i can't even tell what they actually intended

willow bear
#

probably bc you don't have a good understanding of what a function is

#

you wouldn't think that f(2x) = 2f(x) was automatically true for all functions f

viscid thistle
#

Ok. Thx for your help. I'll move on to other problems

odd helm
viral trail
#

Consider f(x) = 4x/(3x + 4)

I found the inverse is f-1(y)= -4y/(3y-4)

But how can I find range of f(x)?

#

@odd helm
tan(x-2) = ± √3
Principal solutions ±π/3 then form general solutions

#

x-2 = ±π/3

serene heath
#

@viral trail what is the domain of f?

copper vigil
#

What is the maximum number of intersections that f(x) and g(x) can have if:

#

f(x) is a function of the form a|x-h|+k

#

and g(x) is a function of the form a(x-h)^2+k

#

i don't even know how i am supposed to begin trying to solve this

#

<@&286206848099549185>

remote veldt
#

@copper vigil note that both have the same "vertex". You know how |x| comes to a point, and x^2 has the vertex? because h and k are the same, that point on the absolute value function will be the same as the vertex on the quadratic. That's intersection #1, and it also gives you a very powerful tool: if you note that both are symmetric about the same point, you only need to look for intersections on one side of h. However many there are, there'll be just as many as the other side (make sure you don't double count the vertex!). See what you can do with that

warped dagger
#

This is probably a pretty dumb question, and its probably something that i missed out on so i'm not getting the whole picture. 2*log25-log125-log5=0 I have no clue how to solve this, im pretty confused, if anyone can just tell me how to, or what to do.

fleet yew
#

@warped dagger what are you trying to do with that equation

#

there are no variables, so there is nothing to solve for

#

are you just trying to prove the identity?

warped dagger
#

Yeah, it's proving identity, thank you for the help, that was a pretty retarded question, gonna go take a look on youtube

fleet yew
#

@warped dagger what base?

warped dagger
#

Theres no base given, so 10 i assume

fleet yew
#

i don't think it really matters

warped dagger
#

used base 5 and it was 0

odd helm
#

But when I graph the polynomial I get a zero at x=5 but none of my possible zeroes give me 5

alpine narwhal
#

i believe you got the wrong polynomial

#

check your distribution

harsh cipher
#

Hello

#

I'm back

#

I guessed and got it wrong

#

oh no

#

new picture

#

Does the answer part make sense?

#

to me it does not make sense

uncut mulch
#

no it does not

#

missing parentheses

#

= cos ( A + B )

harsh cipher
#

loolllllll

#

where

uncut mulch
#

first line

#

compound angle identity for cosine

harsh cipher
#

what about the 4th line

uncut mulch
#

NFI WTF IS GOING ON THERE

harsh cipher
#

hahahahah

undone pawn
#

lmao

uncut mulch
#

from cos ( A + B )

#

its just a simple substitution

undone pawn
#

randomly B came out of the trig function

#

oh ok I get the problem

#

they don't like parenthesis

harsh cipher
#

this person that wrote this page for the school doesn't like to use parentheses or new line. I've this type of mistake from previous chapters

#

seen

undone pawn
#

lmao

#

cos(A+B) = cos(pi/2 - B + B) = cos(pi/2)=0

#

that's what they intended to write

#

they hate = too

uncut mulch
#

fk lol i see that now

#

geez

harsh cipher
#

yes!!

uncut mulch
#

gotta be psychic

undone pawn
#

yas

uncut mulch
undone pawn
#

^

harsh cipher
#

hahaha

#

so I couldn't see where the parentheses or the equal sign goes

#

-_-

#

I flagged the question. never used it before though 🙂

uncut mulch
#

parentheses are important

#

they're functions. you wouldn't ever consider writing
f x instead of f(x)

harsh cipher
#

hell yeah they are

hollow cobalt
#

hello

#

got a question for yall

#

h(x)=f(x/2)-3

#

means that every x in H

#

would grow twice as bigger

#

and the y would lose 3

#

right?

lost pawn
#

If you're comparing to f(x), then yes. You make a horizontal stretch by a factor of 2 and a vertical shift of -3 units

hollow cobalt
#

factor?

#

i am sorry, i study maths in a foreign language

lost pawn
#

It means that every x gets multiplied by 2

#

In the graph

hollow cobalt
#

alright

#

ty

#

so i got another question

#

f(x) has asemptots in 1 and 4

#

if i said it right

#

x=1 x=4

#

and the extreme points are 2 and 7

#

so 2 becomes 4 in h(x)

#

but its impossible

#

f(x)=(e^x/2)/(x^2-5x+4)

lost pawn
#

I don't get the question, sorry

#

Can you rephrase?

#

What is your native langauge btw?

hollow cobalt
#

hebrew

#

ill explain

#

they asked me to sketch h(x)

#

after that h(x)=f(x/2)-3

#

and f'(x)=0 then x=2 x=7

#

now they become x=4 and x=14

#

but x=4 can't be because of x^2-5x+4

#

so what is happenin

lost pawn
#

Well

#

h(4) is actually fine

#

Because h(4)=f(2)-3

#

and f(2) is fine to compute

#

But h(8) on the other hand will run into that problem

hollow cobalt
#

nvm i got it

#

if you do h(x)=f(x/2)

#

mean when x=1 asymptote becomes 2

#

and 4 becomes 8

#

so 2 ain't no problem

lost pawn
#

yeah

hollow cobalt
#

why i thought it wouldn't change

#

so lesson learned

#

when ever there is a change in f(x), inside the brackets

#

it means every thing moves

#

on the x axis

lost pawn
#

yes, you can put it like that

lilac scaffold
#

ok there is chances n3 to get one for each playlist

hollow cobalt
#

c and d are false for sure

#

if i am not wrong

lilac scaffold
#

now someone tell me whats that c

hollow cobalt
#

c is n over 3

lilac scaffold
#

(n 3) is that combination or C ?

hollow cobalt
#

wym

#

same thing

lilac scaffold
#

like nC3

hollow cobalt
#

its the chances of picking n out of 3

#

yes

lilac scaffold
#

i used them a lot

hollow cobalt
#

it is

lilac scaffold
#

and (n 3) both are same right ?

hollow cobalt
#

i don't understand your answer

#

questions**%^4

#

n 3 and nC3

#

arre the same

lilac scaffold
#

thanks for clearing it

#

and the answer is B

#

i dont know why they divide it by 3^3

hollow cobalt
#

you have 3 playlists

#

each one contains n/3

#

songs

#

and your way of picking is n/3 * n/3 * n/3

#

the chances of picking a song from each playlist are the same

#

means the max you get is n^3/27

#

and it has equals sign to it

#

unlike A

#

so you pick B

lilac scaffold
#

now i got it

#

i read the question wrong

hollow cobalt
#

damn i didn't do combinatorics for long time

#

is it for sat?

lilac scaffold
#

i thought, every playlist has n no of songs

#

so nnn

#

thanks btw @hollow cobalt

hollow cobalt
#

👍

robust island
#

Hello.

#

Any answer for this ? ^

willow bear
#

could,,, you take a screenshot

viral trail
#

Consider f(x) = 4x/(3x + 4)

I found the inverse is f-1(y)= -4y/(3y-4)

But how can I find range of f(x)?
@viral trail

Domain of f is R

narrow peak
#

@robust island what do you not know

robust island
#

I'm confuse of how to substitute and when it cancel out

narrow peak
#

which

robust island
#

The first picture 1,2,3,4,5,6

narrow peak
#

aight lemme see

#

foe 2nd one

#

for

#

u do know

robust island
#

I know their value but i don't know when to cancel out

narrow peak
#

tanθ=sinθ/cosθ

#

@robust island is it ok now

#

for 2nd

proud gate
#

A vector with angle of -27.57 if different than the same vector magnitude and angle of 333.43? The angles, while 360 degrees apart still point the vector in the same direction.
But this got me wrong in a quiz. But is my reasoning right?

proud gate
#

Oh and also, the vector component form given is (4, -2)

obtuse mulch
#

Hey, I’m Max.

I’m having trouble with rationalising 1 over the square root of 6 could someone help?

#

I know the answer is the square root of 6 / 6 but I’m not quite sure why

remote veldt
#

@obtuse mulch $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{6}} \cdot \frac{\sqrt{6}}{\sqrt{6}}$$

obsidian monolithBOT
#

Nicholas:

@Max_The_Masterton $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{6}} \cdot \frac{\sqrt{6}}{\sqrt{6}}$$
```Compile error! Output:

! Missing $ inserted.
<inserted text>
$
l.54 @Max_
The_Masterton $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{6}} \cdot \fra...
I've inserted a begin-math/end-math symbol since I think
you left one out. Proceed, with fingers crossed.

LaTeX Font Info: Calculating math sizes for size <14> on input line 54.
LaTeX Font Info: Try loading font information for U+msa on input line 54.
(/usr/local/texlive/2018/texmf-dist/tex/latex/amsfonts/umsa.fd

proud gate
#

@obtuse mulch multiply by sqrt(6) over sqrt(6)

#

This is the same as 1/1 but the sqrt(6) on the bottom cancels the sqrt to just 6.
With a sqrt(6) on the top.

peak hill
sharp marsh
#

Help

fleet yew
#

@sharp marsh i want you to do something

sharp marsh
#

ya?

fleet yew
#

do you see that left hand side

sharp marsh
#

mhmm

fleet yew
#

make it have a base of e

sharp marsh
#

so e^1.618?

fleet yew
#

no

sharp marsh
#

err

fleet yew
#

you have 4^(x+3)

#

make it have a base of e

#

instead of a base of 4

sharp marsh
#

o

fleet yew
#

do you know how to do that

sharp marsh
#

wait I was putting it into the wrong problem It hink

#

nvm

#

Says it's wrong still

fleet yew
#

dude you have to work with me

#

do you know how to make that expression have a base of e

sharp marsh
#

So which part

#

Uhhh

#

Ln*?

fleet yew
#

wait which problem do you need help with

sharp marsh
#

First one

#

I insert into wrong section

#

I mean second

#

This new one

#

Ya

fleet yew
#

ok

#

just take ln of both sides

sharp marsh
#

I did

fleet yew
#

x^2-3=x-2

sharp marsh
#

(1+sqrt(5))/2

#

(1-sqrt(5))/2

#

Right?

#

Since x^2-x-1

#

One number was negative though do I put in that too?

#

Nvm figured it out

fleet yew
#

got it?

sharp marsh
#

Yep

#

Didn’t include -.618 bc I was thinking of log

#

With negative number

sharp marsh
#

How do I do log(x-5) = 13/7

fleet yew
#

@sharp marsh what base

sharp marsh
#

Sorry the original problem was

#

7log(x-5)=13

#

@fleet yew

fleet yew
#

what base logarithm?

sharp marsh
#

er 10

fleet yew
#

ok

#

let's look at this expression:

#

log_10(x-5)

#

what can you do with this

sharp marsh
#

um

#

Can I multiply by 10?

fleet yew
#

there is subtraction inside the logarithm

sharp marsh
#

oh

#

log(x-5)/log(10)

fleet yew
#

that's change of base

#

how do you simplify subtraction

sharp marsh
#

um

#

wym

stuck lark
#

@fleet yew no

#

log(a-b) is not equivalent to log(a)/log(b)

fleet yew
#

yeah my bad lol typed the wrong thing

stuck lark
#

log(a/b)=log(a)-log(b)

sharp marsh
#

uh

#

so I can't do that?

stuck lark
#

log(a-b) is not equivalent to log(a)/log(b)

sharp marsh
#

What can I do with it then?

stuck lark
#

7log(x-5)=13
log(x-5)=13/7 sounds fine

#

then you should know that exponentiation and logarithms are inverse functions

#

Specifically $x\mapsto10^x$ and $x\mapsto\log_{10}(x)$ for $x>0$ are inverse functions

obsidian monolithBOT
stuck lark
#

this gives us that for all $x>0$,
$$\log_{10}(10^x)=10^{\log_{10}(x)}=x$$

obsidian monolithBOT
sharp marsh
#

erm

#

So do I

#

10^13/7

#

?

#

So that I can get rid of log

stuck lark
#

the exact step you’re thinking of is setting both sides as the exponent of 10

sharp marsh
#

ya

wheat condor
#

Hey guys, I have 3 question from my homework that I don’t understand, can anyone help? It’s simple precalc

remote veldt
wheat condor
#

i have no idea what im doing on all 3 but ik for the 3rd question, quadrant one is both positives

remote veldt
#

for the first one, write csc(x) as 1/sin, and write cot(x) as cos/sin in the numerator, and write sec(x) as 1/cos(x) in the denominator. take each of the numerator and the denominator, and simplify/combine them individually, then see what cancels

fleet yew
stuck lark
#

@sharp marsh that leaves the left side as x-5, the rest is easy

wheat condor
#

ok

#

can i get help on the other 2 please?

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

nvm i got them

#

thanks

vernal spindle
remote veldt
#

write [tan(x) + cot(x)]/[csc(x)] in terms of cos(x)

fluid shore
#

The question's just asking you to give sin(x) as the answer by stating that the given expression is axiomatically equal to it

vernal spindle
#

Is the first step ((sinx/cosx)+(cosx/sinx))/(1/sinx)

vernal spindle
#

?

pale bison
#

yes

#

wops nvm the message was several hours late

fluid shore
#

No just assume that it's sin(x)

pale bison
vernal spindle
#

What do you mean assume its sin(x) @fluid shore

fluid shore
#

lmao i was just messing around, ignore me

vernal spindle
#

I'm still lost on the question though

willow bear
#

rewriting your expression as (sin(x)/cos(x) + cos(x)/sin(x))/(1/sin(x)) will certainly be a sensible first step

#

as long as you know how to deal with nested fractions

vernal spindle
#

the first step

willow bear
#

there's no such thing as "the" first step because there are many ways to do this problem

#

each having a different first step

#

@vernal spindle

vernal spindle
#

hmm

willow bear
#

...

#

did you spend all this time waiting for me to give you explicit approval along the lines of "yes this is the first step, keep going"?

vernal spindle
#

Not exactly, I'm trying to figure out if im on the right path though

willow bear
#

well you've got your thing in terms of sines and cosines only

vernal spindle
#

I think its
((2sinx/cosxsinx)+(2cosx/cosxsinx))/(1/sinx)

willow bear
#

you what

vernal spindle
#

^as a step not answer

willow bear
#

$\frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)} \neq \frac{2\sin(x)}{\sin(x)\cos(x)}$

obsidian monolithBOT
willow bear
#

first off you're overthinking it already

#

like why not AT LEAST rewrite the division by (1/sin(x)) as a multiplication by sin(x)

vernal spindle
#

isnt 1/sinx = cscx

sturdy haven
#

Help with 1 2 and 3 please

willow bear
#

@vernal spindle 1/sin(x) = csc(x), but if you're interpreting that as "every time you see 1/sin(x) in any context whatsoever, the next step has to be to replace it with csc(x) no matter what" then you're wrong

#

plus you had just rewritten csc(x) as 1/sin(x), so what's the point in undoing that

#

what i'm saying is

#

$\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\sin(x)}} = \sin(x)$

obsidian monolithBOT
vernal spindle
#

So now I just have to get the sinx into terms of cos?

willow bear
#

you have to SIMPLIFY the expression, first and foremost.

#

get it into a form where it's not as much of a MESS as $\frac{\frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)} + \frac{\cos(x)}{\sin(x)}}{1/\sin(x)}$, and only THEN worry about how to write it in terms of $\cos(x)$ only.

obsidian monolithBOT
willow bear
#

wouldn't that be the natural course of action which almost suggests itself?

vernal spindle
#

Yeah

#

so the expression simplifies down to sinx since the top is 1 then 1 over a faction cancels leaving just sin

willow bear
#

no the expression doesn't simplify down to sin(x)

fleet yew
#

use the quotient identities

willow bear
#

the top isn't 1

vernal spindle
#

I'm struggling too much

fleet yew
#

look at the numerator

vernal spindle
#

tanx+cotx

fleet yew
#

very good

#

so you have $\frac{\tan+\cot}{1/\sin}$

vernal spindle
#

yeah

obsidian monolithBOT
fleet yew
#

so that denominator looks kind of tricky

#

we have division in the denominator

#

let's get rid of it

#

how?

vernal spindle
#

rewrite it as csc?

willow bear
#

you literally just rewrote csc as 1/sin. why would you undo that

fleet yew
#

you know what sure you can do that

vernal spindle
#

ohh i see that now

#

can i multiply sin to both top and bottom to rid it?

fleet yew
#

yes

vernal spindle
#

so (tanx+cotx)sinx

fleet yew
#

yes

vernal spindle
#

what would i do next

fleet yew
#

distributive property

vernal spindle
#

tanxsinx+cotxsinx

fleet yew
#

now what

vernal spindle
#

erm

fleet yew
#

what is the definition of tan

vernal spindle
#

sin/cos

fleet yew
#

so let's just use the definitions of tan and cot

#

(sin/cos) * sin + (cos/sin) * sin

vernal spindle
#

(2sin/cos)+cos

fleet yew
#

it's not 2sin

vernal spindle
#

sin^2

fleet yew
#

yes

vernal spindle
#

what can i do next with the sin^2

fleet yew
#

bring it all to a common denominator

#

cos = cos/1

#

so you have

#

sin^2/cos + cos/1

vernal spindle
#

ohh

#

sin^2+cos^2

fleet yew
#

that's the numerator

#

what's the denominator

vernal spindle
#

cos

#

(sin^2+cos^2)/cos

fleet yew
#

ok

#

now you should know something about that numerator

vernal spindle
#

its 1