#precalculus
1 messages · Page 198 of 1
wdym reduce
,rcw
,,,,,,, what even
"in terms of cos(x)" is vague
That’s all it says
do you have the exact problem statement
That’s it verbatim
wow ok like
I have like half a solution
okay the smartass answer would be "(cos(x))^4
From class
i mean ok like... you can use the formula $\cos^2(t) = \frac12(1 + \cos(2t))$
Ann:
twice
yes
now simplify the fuck out of this
My back hurts
Maybe possibly decompose it into sin x and cos x only
Like u can pull out something I know the fraction is supposed to be 1/16
She showed us the answer
But I only wrote down some of it
And I lost the paper
:,(( tomorrows test gonna suck ass
as mentioned earlier, the way the question was presented was extremely weird
and we have nfi what it actually wants
it wants it in the for of cosx
There other problems which ask for it in cosx or sinx (different questions tho)
I remember there being a tan3x express in terms of tanx
@uncut mulch what did u use to solve it
Like what program
as mentioned earlier cos^4(x) is already in terms of cos(x) so the question doesn't really make sense
and what you reached is in terms of cos(ax), cos(bx)
wolfram
Ty
I can figure out the tan problem now
Is it alternate representation or alternate forms?
@uncut mulch
Where is alternate forms
Wtf is a derivative
Is that the slope
Sure
The derivative of some function f(x) can notated as f'(x)
At a given x value c
f'(c) = the slope of f(x) at x = c
uh ignore the align environment stuff, its just latex formatting
how can I simplify this
does it just want me to solve n(5)+(2n(n-1))/2 >165165
So the answer should be n = 405 because it has to be an integer
@willow bear thanks
who said it was 1

its in the solutions my teacher gave me and wolfram alpha said it too but i dont have the pro version to see the steps :(
WA said it was 1?
yes
doubt
are you sure that's a minus sign and not a plus sign between the roots
ill check

ah yes
that was the initial term
by expanding with the same but instead of minus a plus
$(a-b)^2 \neq a^2 - b^2$
can someone explain why you would expand with a plus instead of a minus
Ann:
In mathematics, a (real) interval is a set of real numbers lying between two numbers, the extremities of the interval. For example, the set of numbers x satisfying 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 is an interval which contains 0, 1 and all numbers in between. Other examples of intervals are the...
thanks i lack the vocabulary and its frustrating to google
What have you tried?
Oh, amazing
So it factors into (x + 9)(x + 3) = 0
What about here?
,rccw
Theres a common factor between the two terms
What is it?
I'm bad with that
?
You have an x in both terms don't you?
I have an x in the # 10
And you have an x in the first term
Ah yeah
Factor that out
The x^2?????!!!!!
Factor out x
Idk how to factor that!
x multiplied by what gives x^2?
By it self...
-10
Can I do it like this?

What about this?
Ok, if you want to do it the long way
What two numbers add to -10 and multiply to 0?
0 × -10= 0
0+ (-10)= -10
So my factor tree would look like this?
Those are not factors
Those are what sums to -10
But either way, you should learn how to factor common factors in general
Yes...
Just rote learning methods is not useful if you don't understand why they work
:// I'll ask my teacher but now I really need to get this done
Can you help me here?
Not 3, but 2
-26 doesn't have more possibilities
That what I did here
Is that not a 16 on the LHS?
No, 15
Then it's not factorable over rational numbers
What should I do then? No solution?
Quadratic formula or complete the square
It would have rational solutions if the LHS was 16
Then it has no rational solutions
Ok
I didn't do algebra 2, that's why I struggle with simple stuff
You should probably revise algebra 2
I fell like he would want me to do something
Yeah 
Can you teach me?
Or should I watch a video?
Or should I wait for him to teach me :/?
You should learn it now
I watched a video and I don't know how to continue
The exercise wants me to give a result in order pairs
Yeah, but I don't know why am doing what am doing xD
I just followed the template
It's completing the square
You want to get to a point where you have
(something)^2 = numbers
So you can square root both sides to solve
Oh, okay
Is this okay?
How do I find p given a conic equation of a parabola
Example?
(x-3)^2=4(y-5) so how do i know what p is
Do you have any more information?
?
In an equation like a(x-h)^2+k
It is easy to find p
What is the formula for a conic equation
a=1/4p
Wait so it is refused
??
a = 1/(4p) <=> p = 1/(4a) no?
I am so confused omg
Parentheses for clarity
So answer me this
two questions
In a conic equation of a parabola
WHERE IS a
AND WHAT DOES P EQUAL
Stop with the caps
It's literally just algebra
Which I have already shown
Scroll up
earlten, have you done your basics first
you were learning about differentiation just about a week ago
ik that cos is the reciprical
So 1/cos(theta) = 12/4 right?
yes
Take reciprocal of both sides
yeah and solve
cos(theta) = 4/12 = 1/3
What’s cooking?
thanks for the help much appreciated
mmmM yes trigonometric functions...
Trig is boring
how would i do cosecant(pie/3) without a calculator
Well
*pi
What can you rewrite cosecant as?
pi not pie
What's sin(pi/3)?
It has an exact value
^ special angles
Just use the approximation sin(x)\approx x
I believe you can derive this by cutting down the perpendicular of an equilateral triangle
and/or do you know how to convert radians to degreens
You should learn your special angles
the answer comes out to be square root (2) / 2
we havent gotten that far
but is it possible to do in terms of 2pi
it says to evaluate cos(pi/4) without a calculator and i have no idea how to do it
the answer comes out to be Rooot(2)/
You need to learn your special angles
These are special angles
alright
You need to learn them somehow
alright
Either through deriving or memorising
were talking about the unit cirle tomorrow so guess ill learn about it then
thanks for the help
np
you can derive them from isosceles and equilateral triangles
and that pi (radians) = 180°
thanks
x|log2x|3log2(x-4)+1
list three points
X= 1,2,4
🤔
sorry bro
and that doesn't make much sense
so y= ?
yea
what about those x values?
Why not just plug in the points
are those where they want the points?
^
no
Let me try to format
log_(base) arg
IAmJon:
write is as least ambiguously as possible
Don’t just say “no”
^ say how its different
tell me how to fix it then, so we are on the same page
how do i find sec(theta) and csc (theta) if cot (theta) = -4/3 and cos(theta) < 0
determine which quadrant theta is in
@long pond lemme just try to do this myslef because this stuff is kind of on a test tmr
no not 4th
i mean 2 or 3
$\text{use log_(base) (arg) to represent } \log_{base} (arg)$
sorry and thanks for ur efforts
Ok
My teacher would have a brain aneurysm if i wrote that notation on a test, just saying
well cos is negative in 2rd or 3rd,
where is cot negative?
i dont really know
do you know what cot is?
recip of tan
and where is tan negative?
would cot be neg when tan is neg?
so which quadrant are you in?
2
ok good.
i dont really know what to do from there
heres the question again if you need it
v
how do i find sec(theta) and csc (theta) if cot (theta) = -4/3 and cos(theta) < 0
re-check your ratios
well x = -4
yeah
I would adjust the interval first
Ok thatd be between 0 to 6π then right?
Yeah
Good
You can inverse cos both sides
But like
You should know the cos of what gives 1
Yea
And so x = 0 is a solution
When do more solutions occur?
Wait
Don't divide by 3 yet
Oh okay
Would that be 2π
Then 4π?
5π?

hi
@fluid shore hey u there? 😛
coz
i have a question
what does it want me to do
well
Uh show the full statement of the problem
im comparing too variables
oh its an assignment
thats what a part of it is
so
I have that so this is being done on a data software and
what do i even do
write about the mean and median?
what can u even say about it?
Hmm I can't say much about this cos I've not really done that sort of thing before. Uh take this to #probability-statistics and you might get more help there from others who know about this more than I do.
They say that to calculate the derivate of F in x you just have to know the derivate of in 0...why is it so?
ur gonna have to give a lil more information
what's f
So we have the function f(x) =a^x
And we want to derivate ir
It
F is the function
And we use the average velocity between x and x+h
is french your first language?
ok ann speaks french, so perhaps you two can converse in french so she can decipher what you're doing
Who s Ann?
discount Tuong
moi
Salut jpx ptetre t envoyer la feuille ?
envoie la ici
,rccw
J ai compris le calcul
Mais jvois pas comment on est passé de la vitesse moyenne à f'(x)
la variation moyenne
Oui c ça variation pardon
la limite de V(x, x+h) lorsque h tend vers 0 c'est la DÉFINITION de f'(x)
littéralement
Oui hahaha et pk on dit que il suffit de connaitre f'(0)?
parce qu'on a exprimé f'(x) pour tous les points x en termes de f'(0)
si on connaît f'(0) on connaît f' partout
en utilisant la formule obtenue dans ta photo
OK merci de ton temps
@mystic oasis you see how when you factor it
You can cancel a factor from the top and bottom of the fraction?
ohh
So you cancel that out
And then directly sub in
@viscid thistle I watched this to learn completing the square
This algebra 2 video tutorial shows you how to complete the square to solve quadratic equations. This video is for high school students taking algebra 1 & 2 and college students taking introductory or college algebra. This video contains plenty of examples and practice prob...
<@&286206848099549185> I need to know how to calculate the bi-weekly payment for a car.
Does anyone know?
I'll tell you everything you need to know but I just can't figure out the formula.
Do you know how to calculate the weekly payment for a car? @deft peak
Also next time send your question then ping helpers after 15m
Oh I apologize.
And no I do not.
what formula should I use?
The total cost of the car is $28,585. The interest rate is 1.99%/a bi-weekly for 4 years.
<@&286206848099549185> Not trying to spam. Class ends in 20 mins 😛
@deft peak if you're in class get off your phone and ask your teacher
You have peers to help you ;-;
ask people in your class then
After class I'm down to help
Ok. Thanks.
Do you guys think I could get some help with the question like later tonight?
What time zone are you guys on?
Either way I'll be around at 7:30ish EST.
I appreciate the coming help!
I need help understanding this question
Same problem but with a picture
Important is the 2D interpretation to the left
@green zenith
Okay ill take a look
I still dont undwrstand how to put this as a function
I tried relating my volume with the surface area
A square has its length increased by 4 meters and its width decreased by 5 meters. The resulting rectangle has an area of 132 meters. What is the original perimeter?
Np. So the picture shows a 2" cut out, but you actually want an x" cut out @green zenith
The height of the box is x". What's the bottom side length?
Yeah, hi!
heyy!!
If you call the bottom side length y, you can solve for it in terms of x.
oh so i have a question 😛
did u ever do a data statistics cpt?
im almost done but
im confused about some parts
So call the height x, call the bottom side length y. Can you express the surface area of the box in terms of x and y?
I think we're mixing up x and y, I was thinking
S = 4xy + y²
Oh yeah
Each side is xy, the bottom is y²
I definitely did
But we know S. Your question states S = 9
Wait hold up I think I'm mixing up what the question wants. I think the question means x is the bottom side
The question would be easier if it were x = bottom side length, so I think that's what they want oop
If that's the interpretation, then:
S = 4xy + x²
But that also means:
9 = 4xy + x²
Finally, we can solve for y:
y = (9 - x²) / 4x
9 is my volume
OH MB that's volume
Wow I'm really screwing with you here. Okay okay let's go back
It is fine
Complete restart. Let x be the bottom side length. Let y be the height:
V = x²y
S = 4xy + x²
Cool with both of those?
Yeah
Now V = 9. Solving for y in the first equation, we got:
y = 9/x²
Plugging that into the bottom:
S = 4x(9/x²) + x²
And simplifying:
S = 36/x + x²
It's open top. That is, it has no lid
Oooooh
So it has no surface
Got it
So we only 5 sides
Well i think thats it
Thank you for helping!
what's the question
oh
would i have to explain those?
is that what its asking
its part of the rubric for my assignment
May I have some help please?
This is my problem:
cotX=sin2X/1-cos2X and I have to verify that it is true
Here’s what I have to work with
And this
Yes it is
Well, I tried making cotX into cosX/sinX but that didn’t get me anywhere
I have other work that basically just took me back to where I started but I’ve already erased that
that's a good first step
now try multiplying top and bottom of that fraction by 2sinx
The bottom becomes 2sin^2X, correct?
indeed
I can make sin2X on the other side into 2sinXcosX
Should I do that?
Oh yeah that’s the other side
stick to working with one side
Okay
This is what I have now
Sorry if it’s terrible quality
Can I reduce the twos on the left?
To just get rid of them
Oh yeah and then I can make sin^2X into 1-cos^2X
Oh but that’s not the same as the other side
Poop
2sin^2=2sin^2+1-1=1-(1-2sin^2)
best not to structure it like that
do LHS =
=...
=...
=RHS when you actually reach it
Here’s another problem I have
I’ve been working at it for a while
I’ve got the sinA/2 and cosA/2 made into the radical things
And I’ve tried many things, like separating the fractions, dividing by a negative to try and get something I can work with, multiplying top and bottom by sin or cos, and nothing’s been working
I even tried multiplying out the square
It all led to dead ends
@twilit shadow
Let's say you square the right side. What does it look like after?
that was definitely not what was recommended
square the rhs immediately
don't do any extra stuff
$\left(\sin(\frac A2) - \cos(\frac A2)\right)^2 = \ ?$
ramonov:
I have to square that first?
You'll get a much nicer result
you can start from whichever side is more convenient
Okay
you can also start from the lhs but it isn't as obvious which identites to apply
no
I don’t really know what to call that
There's a special identity 
don't overthink it
Sin^2 + cos^2?
just that?
And -2sincos
don't leave out the arguments
huh?
this is exactly why you should type them in
especially when the quesion involves both A/2 and A
sin^2(A/2)-2sin(A/2)cos(A/2)+cos^2(A/2)
ok. now what identites can you apply?
I can do sin^2(A/2)+cos^2(A/2)=1
And
sin2(A/2)=2sin(A/2)cos(A/2)
I think the second one is good to use
re-check what you typed for the second one
Was that wrong?
the left side of it
Yes that becomes just sinA, right?
Oh
sin2 is not a function
Okay
you would've at least needed
sin(2 (A/2)) = sin(A)
Well yeah that’s how I was thinking
but yes, apply those 2 identites
Oh hey now it’s the same as the left side
Thank you very much!
You relieved a ton of stress
This is why I love math, because it just works. Even when I just can’t get it and it stresses me out, I love the end result when it’s finally solved
And now there’s only one more to do for my homework
If I have cotA-1/cotA+1 I can make that into tanA+1/tanA-1, right?
that doesn't look right,
can you put parentheses where appropriate?
,w (cot x-1)/(cot x+1 ) = (tan x+1)/(tan x-1)
Anyone there to help with something?
?
Ya sorry
It’s an ellipse
I know how to figure the vertices and foci our when the center is 0,0
How much is it stretched vertically?
Yes
So you can go 2 units up from the centre: (-3, 3)
And 2 units down from the centre: (-3, -1)
Where did you get the center (-3,3)
You typed (-3,3)
Sure
And do I add that to the x values of my two vertices?
Yeah, that seems fine
np
I need help
STAT
I have been trying to understand this all night
And I have a quiz tommorw
problem:
e^2x - e^x -6 = 0
If anyone could help before I fall asleep of sleep deprivation that would be nice
thats not the only problem btw
assuming that first term is e^(2x)
that is a quadratic in e^x
i. e, to solve, substitute e^x=y and proceed
although not necessary
but if its your first few times dealing with these, it will help
ok ramonov just told you what to do
do you understand the comments we made?
Okay so make a variable that represents e^x and plug it in and work it out?
not necessary, but if you want, you can use e^x = y to make things easier for you
Okay
once you solve for y, you'll be able to solve for x using y=e^x
I'm guessing negative values are no solutions
For y values going into e^x
@lilac pier
What do u mean sorry
assuming the question is asking for real solutions, yeah you'll ignore negative values for y
Okay thank you
(you'll learn about that at higher math, don't worry too much about it now)
what did you end up getting?
So wait I find that e^x = 3 is true but where do I go from there
ln both sides
What
ln = the natural log base e
oh noes
So ln 3
yes, x = ln(3)
Which is approx 1.10
try expressing them as exponents with the same base
How would I go about doing that
know your tables!
note that 9 and 27 are both powers of a certain number
Both of 3
9 can be expressed as 3^2
hence 1/9 can be expressed as 3^(?)
-2
yes
so do you times the exponets inside the parentheses and out side like the (-2) * (x+3) ?
yes
seems ok
Number 8 holy shit I have no clue on . The only thing I know to start with is say that e^2x is = y
Past that this is the hardest question
And I don't know
maybe factor
vbut how
you dont know to solve quadratics?
I do
this is same as the first question you asked except it's e^2x instead of e^x
then solve the quadratic lol
okay LOL
these all seem to involve tricks with exponents
show the expression show there's no confusion
$\frac{a^b} {a^c} = a^{b-c} $
FlynnXD:
this?
yeah I guess lol
"im not a math person" 
Sometimes, people find it hard to express their own doubts about something if that thing is particularly confusing.
@undone pawn https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/363224154469826562/667644866511110165/JPEG_20200117_022130.jpg
in problem 8 u said I could use quadratic equation
However I am not sure about my answer...
I plugged in
a = 3 b = -9 and c = -15
then I assumed u square it but I am not sure really keep in mind it is 2:38 am for me so i am not as confident in my math abilities or anything for that matter so I am sorry lol
what exaclty are you squaring?
I thought it had to do with the e^2x if that even makes sense
IDk really I am reallyt ired
Or do u just do it normally
ah, but you shouldn't be doing any more squaring
you could also divide everything by 3 first to work with smaller numbers
plugging it into the QF will give you the solutions to
e^(2x)
and similar to be before, log both sides
(also remove the negative solution)
how do i do (2-2i)(1+i)
ya
just expand like normal
multiplying complex numbers i guess
cuz the answer sheet says it equals 4 but i dont understand why
np
Im so confused with fig 1.67 here
It says in the book that sin a=12/180 and sin b=12/62.
How??
Am i to assume that if angle a have the opposite side value of 12, the hypotenuse is 180?
I dont even know if it is the same angle with the angle on Chicago
well angle a is the same as the angle at the very top (the Chicago one)
If the seemingly parallel lines are really parallel cuz it didn’t specify
Oh wait it did (in the question)
So the two angles are corresponding angles
Same for angle b and the other one
vector algebra pset is what you should search
I'm doing matrices:
I've completed the first 2
I want to know whether the WZ means to multiply
W x Z
I did some research regarding the T symbol shown in question (iii)
T means transpose
Matrice V has 2 rows and 3 columns
Would it look like this after being transposed: -1 0
5 3
2 1
yes
cheers
So for this
I'd need to multipy Matrice U by the transposed matrice V which is now this
yes
alright so
what's the domain and range of this parametric equation
how do i know what is is
what it is
i thought it's domain would be all real numbers from [-5, 3], but when i graphed it on desmos it was just excluding all real numbers from (-3, 1)
how did you get -5 to 3
cuz if you plug in pi/3 into 2sec(t) - 1 you get 2(2) - 1 = 3
and then
right?
and for the other one you plug in 2pi/3 into 2sec(t) -1
to get 2(-2) - 1 = -5 ??
i dont get it
sorry i dont get your thought process, i can tell you mine though
find the range of sec(t) and when its undefined (from -1 to 1). so 2sec(t)-1 is undefined from 2(-1)-1 to 2(1)-1, therefore the domain (where x is defined) is all x but x from -3 to 1
now tanx has no range restrictions so y =4tant+3 has range of all real numbers
whats the range of secx
everything excluding -1 to 1?
yeah so whats the range of 2secx-1
well tell me your understanding cause you dont wanna get this wrong in the future
so we can get the range of 2secx-1
if im confusing you, i mean the range of x = 2sect-1
x is the range of 2sect-1
but its the domain of the whole function
if it makes sense
you cant just plug in random values to find the range of 2sec(t)-1
if cos(x) is 0, then secx is undefined
so if cosx is from (-1,0) then secx is from -1 to negative infinity
if cosx is from (0,1) then secx is from 1 to positive infinity
so overall, the range of secx is all x excluding (-1, 1)
k thx bro
boom
is e^-x = some kind of ln or log
i tried to find zeros for this problem and not know where to start
RokettoJanpu:
$2e^{-x}=xe^{-x}$
Angelium:
$2=x$
Angelium:
wow that was easy lmao
you forgot x=0
@spare hull you shouldn't divide by x... You should factor, otherwise you will lose solutions.
yes i am aware
let e^-x = c
2xc - x^2c = xc(2-x)=0
x=0 and x=2
hi, so I don't understand ambiguous cases in ssa triangles
i've watched many videos, asked friends, read about it
i'm still really troubled on the cases where there are 2 triangles
i just completely don't understand
Depending on the info you have, there can be two triangles that satisfy your constraints
There are two different solutions to sin(θ) = a for some a. So the sin law can give two triangles
@elfin cradle
Can someone help me understand how (-f(x))+(-g(x)) is -(f+g)(x)
I’m really tired but it’s not clicking
$(-a) + (-b) = -(a+b)$
Ann:
Ooooh right
