#precalculus
1 messages · Page 184 of 1
Ok
I have a triangle
that ends up as sin55/a = sinb/7 = sin65/c
how do i create an equation thats solvable if they all have a missing element
Neither give enough information to determine anything
Well, you can say things about b maybe
yea if f,g, were differentiable u could use lhopital's rule and say something about it using the derivative for (a)
1s
What's the difference? You put your opinion on them?
That's the question written like that in the book. no one can asnwer it,.
There's no one answer. Take (x² - 25)/(x - 5). The limit is 10. Instead, take 0/(x - 5), the limit is 0
you don't have enough infomration to say a) doesn't exist, and you are wrong for b)
Told you, it's a really hard question. even my teacher doesn't know the answer.. but It's literally written like that in my book,
It's either true or false.
Okay, then we go with false
Teachers and bookwriters are not infallible
James Stewart - Calculus_ Early Transcendentals-2015
@patent beacon on both (a) and (b) ?
For a) it exists if the functions are both differentiable, which is something that is unknown (L'Hopital's rule). b) it goes to infinity
for example, consider 1/10^(-1) = 10. and 1/10^(-99999) = 10^99999
Can't promise infinity. Might be negative infinity from one direction
true it could be +- infinity, it may not exist too for that reason. bleh
In either case, the function might not be defined to the left or right of 5, so you still get no promises
i don't think it's important to be defined on both sides, the main problem is since we dont know anything about the function going to 0, it could be going to both 0 from negative and 0 from positive, like some stepwise function that changes sign and decreases in abs value
when taking x to the limit point
how do you solve sinθ = 24/25, 0 < θ < pi/2 find cos (2θ)
im doing the double angle form
still not making sense
@viscid thistle can you post what you have
1 - 2 (24/25)^2
Take a pic of your work and post it
if that is what you got as your answer I don’t see the issue
Ok so they told you 24/25 is for sin theta?
sin θ = 24/25, 0 < θ < pi/2, cos (2θ)
Yep I got the same answer as the solutions
So since I can’t see your work I have no clue what needs to be corrected
Only thing I can think of is maybe when you simplify your fractions or when you square the sin theta
So for sin(x) your suppose to square both sides
so 1 - 2sin(24/25)^2 == 527/625?
Well they gave you sin(x) and the formula asks you to plug in (sin(x))^2
isnt it 1 - 2(527/625)
Yes that is correct so maybe you went wrong when simplifying the answer
You multiply the 2 by the fraction then you get the LCD which is 625
No clue what your saying
alright
2 times 576 is what?
1054 is wrong try again
Correct now what do you do to the 1 in front?
625/ 625
Correct
thanks, what formula do i use for sin θ/2 *
It matters what the question is asking and what information is given
I’ve never seen what you just typed there is usually an angle with sin
Sin and cos can’t just equal that
So what are they asking you to do?
You mean when dealing with signs?
oh nvm
you know how cos 2x can be translated into multiple things
how do you decide which one to use
its just situational
ig
It is what information is given you can find the solutions with different methods so yes it is situational
Each formula gives you the same answer
alright thanks
@flint stirrup
Both
like a homework problem
So in level 2 of factoring trinomials right and yes
wdym level 2
its ko
yes
You divide the first number by all the numbers right?
yes
you factor out a number, which is 3 in this case
so take 3 out of each of the terms
what would you get?
x to the second power + x to the second power -42?
yes
I meant minus
Meir:
since we factored out the 3
Oh we got to put the the 3 out of the parenthesis?
yes
Alright hold on I’m going to come back to you in less than 3 minutes
ok
@flint stirrup like this?
@flint stirrup
Does anyone know how to solve this? I tried using arcsin(3/5) on my calculator to get the value of "t" and then substituted that into my calculator to find the rest
As far as I know arcsin turns the fraction into a degree and sin turns the degree into a fraction, so if in this case t is the degree that you have to input onto sin(t) to get 3/5 then shouldnt using arcsin(3/5) give me the value of t?
Your calculator will give you the Q1 angle
You don't need a calc here either way. Use
sin²θ + cos²θ = 1
To get cos. All of the rest follow
oh i see, btw is there a way to turn the Q1 angle the calc gives me into the next quadrant?
wasnt it like 180-the calc
Perfect, that's it
Imagining the unit circle is key
Np, good luck with it
hi
the part where it says -3 fits this condition but not x>0
what does that mean?
x>0 still fits the condition x>-4 ?
lol
-3 is greater than -4
but it isn't greater than 0
x needs to be both:
greater than 0 and greater than 4
the intersections of those is x > 0
......thinking......
(and then the additional restriction of x != 1 is also applied)
how do i solve sqr2 ^20
no,
the -3 was just an example of what doesn't work
at x=-3,
the argument, x + 4 = 1
however the base will be -3 which is negative which will make it undefined
arc functions, are the closest you’ll ever get to an inverse
you’ll have to do the math from there
x=3sin(y)-2
x+2=3sin(y)
(x+2)/3=sin(y)
arcsin((x+2)/3)=y
,w plot arcsin((x+2)/3)=y
you ok
I'm having a lot of trouble understanding this one, and YouTube isn't helping much, was hoping someone could explain
I was thinking about doing "2Pi-5" and using that as the answer but shouldnt it be represented with a fraction containing Pi like the rest?
can ya all explain how you get that other half of cos
i was only given the left half.
identity $\sin^2(x)+\cos^2(x)=1$
RokettoJanpu:
so could you explain it
the identity can be rearranged to suit your problem
roketto i get it wut u mean but I still don't understand how the other half is same as the left half. ik im dumb
phd how would u slove dat
identity $\sin^2(x)+\cos^2(x)=1$
maleb1964:
maleb1964:
Now substitute
lol
you had 1-sin^2(x) on the bottom right?
replace that with cos^2 since we just proved that
yes
I havent gotten to trig identities yet, do you think i should start memorizing them? Or is that not needed
A friend showed me his formula paper and it was filled with them
Yes
rip, feels like there were so many
There are many
wait so why do you put a cosx / cosx^2
But just memorize the fundamental ones
like ik we just proved the bottom half but
Sounds good man, good thing I asked so i have more time for that
? MLG god what?
lol i got quiz tomorrow and i got no clue wuts happening
yeah we can tell xD
you substitute the bottom half
and then you realise both sides are the same
and say "wow, im done, im so good"
thats it
make sure you say “wow, I’m done, I’m so good” out loud During tests
Dude
$cos^2(x)=1-sin^2(x)$
Mekbot:
cos/(cos*cos)=1/cos
just substitute "1-sin^2(x)" to "cos^2(x)" and thats it
and then you realise both sides are the same
and say "wow, im done, im so good"
WOW, IM DONE, IM SO GOOD
^if only dat was true imma go do 3 days worth homework and than review everything
thx alot for help ya all
love ya no homo
How do I go about doing this? I've never seen anything but f(x) so idk what to do when they add something next to the x
Does P(t+pi) mean I have to replace cos(t) with cos(t+pi) ?
Or maybe into cos(t)+pi?
P(t+pi) replaces each t in P(t) with t+pi
oh thnx
MLG GOD:
Like how does cos(x) =0 at bottom make the denominator = 0
$\frac{\sin(x)\cos(x)}{1+\cos(x)}$?
ramonov:
yea like you know how denominator can't equal to 0?
if cos(x) was -1. it would make the bottom equal to zero which isn't permitted.
But if cos(x) is equal to 0 does it still affect the bottom half.
who's saying cos(x) can't be 0?
when 1 + cos x = 0
yes
1/sqrt(2) = sqrt(2)/2
certain calculations could be simpler
oh ic thx alot
anone can help me
with what
Why the limit does not exist? isn't +infty??
it sounds like your book only considers a limit to exist when it is finite
this needs some context though
@willow bear is there such a thing as an infinite limit?
can you please give me an example?
and non example?
I think some books say limits that go to ±infinity are non-existent and some books will say that ±infinity are good answers for limits
that does make sense
what do you mean by "is there such a thing as an infinite limit"
disregard, you stated "it sounds like your book only considers a limit to exist when it is finite" and i thought you implied that there is such a thing as an infinite limit, i have no idea what an infinite limit is supposed to mean. i was just confused please forgive
$\lim_{x \to 0^+} \frac1x = +\infty$
Ann:
that's an example of an infinite limit
yo......
yo
Any help with this please
Mq = show that
Convergente is convergent i guess in english
that looks like japanese to me... cant wait for the later years in school..
it's not japanese, it's poorly written french
yes
okay, i didnt know why i couldn't read it
Any helo tho i tried calculating U(n+1) - U(n)
To get an idea where it would be both increasing and majored
Or decreseasing and minored ( ?)
But didnt help
$u_{n+1} = \sqrt{2 - u_n}$?
Ann:
yes
Any help ?
let $f \colon ]-\infty, 2] \to \bbR$ be given by $\forall x \in ]-\infty, 2], f(x) = \sqrt{2-x}$
Ann:
= ( french is col
then $f([0,2]) = [0, \sqrt{2}]$
Ann:
$f([0, \sqrt{2}]) = [\sqrt{2 - \sqrt{2}}, \sqrt{2}]$ ... i think?
Ann:
maybe it'll come in handy that $f$ is differentiable on $[0, \sqrt{2}]$ and that $|f'| < 1$ on $[0, \sqrt{2}]$
Ann:
even though i don't have the energy rn to notate that in a way that would please Tuong
hmm wait let me try this
Ann:
i hope it's obvious that your sequence is obtained by iterating f starting with 0
whats next ?
i tried doing something but it didnt turns out
i tried to prove that $f(U_{n} = U_{n+1} ; f is continous , U_{0} \in [0,2] ; f([0,2]) \subset [0;2] and find that \lim U_{n} = x whichverifies the equations f(x)=x $
$f(U{n}) = U{n+1} ; f is continous , U{0} \in [0,2] ; f([0,2]) \subset [0;2] and find that \lim U{n} = x whichverifies the equations f(x)=x $
dvaix:
hhhhf bad tex
uhetuehuyehteuht
anyway
i wanted to show all that
and then conclude that Un must converge
but i cant get $\lim U_{n}$
dvaix:
lim u_n is the unique fixed point of f
huh
In mathematics, the Banach–Caccioppoli fixed-point theorem (also known as the contraction mapping theorem or contractive mapping theorem) is an important tool in the theory of metric spaces; it guarantees the existence and uniqueness of fixed points of certain self-maps of ...
i guess you could apply this
Why is there a (x+2) in the numerator
-2 is a VA so (x+2) on denominator but
It’s not a zero so idk why it’s on the numerator
Is arctan continuous on R ?
It is not discontinuous on -pi/2,pi/2 ... ?
arctan is not tan
Oh It's a RESTRICTION of tan !
no, arctan isn't a restriction of tan either
it's the inverse of a restriction of tan
Oh Gotcha
what do you mean by (b)
b , in the theorem
it's a point
I don't remember doing limits in precalc 

Does this graph have any vertical asymptotes or horizontal asymptotes?
I see that it has Vertical asymptotes at x=-1 and x=2
Does it have any horizontal asymptotes?
the way the graph looks suggests that it has two of those
one at y=2, the other at y=4
Divide top n bottom by x
multiply it by $\frac{x^{-1}}{x^{-1}}$
Ann:
Do I divide each part inside the sqrt by x like 16x^2/x and +3x/x ?
Ann:
And how do you solve this?
$\sqrt{ab}=\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}$
RokettoJanpu:
ig in some people's vocabularies, solve is synonymous with algebraically manipulate
uh
you made two mistakes there
$x^{-1}(4x + \sqrt{16x^2 + 3x}) = 4 + \sqrt{16 + 3x^{-2}}$, not $4\sqrt{16x + \frac{1}{3x}}$
Ann:
you forgot something
I meant this
how is anyone supposed to know
how is anyone supposed to know when you meant to write a radical symbol but chose not to do so
This is arctan it has 2 horizontal asymptotes as you can see its graph doesn't touch the horizontal asymptotes..
How come in this function the graph of the function touched the horizontal asymptotes... yet we say it has 2 horizontal asymptotes at y=4 and y=2 ?
horiz asymptotes just tell you the function's end behavior, ie what it does for big positive x and big negative x, not what's happening in between
@stuck lark So in this example above, the function will never intersect with the horizontal asymptotes y=4 and y=2 ?
In big positive x and big negative x ?
rather, think of 4 as the y value the function will converge to as x approaches +inf
Waterblade:
if that's the graph of a function f, lim x to infty f(x)=4
@stuck lark Thanks man, I think you definitely deserve the HONORABLE role.
no prob dude
thanks for the kind words
I'm stuck here..
,rotate 270
monkaS
,rotate 1
consider multiplying numerator and denominator by $q_1^{0.6}q_2^{0.4}$
Element118:
@viscid thistle
I divided the numerator and denominator
Oh nvm
I get it now
I messed up and switched up where the numerator and denominator should be

Ty
I have a problem I want to make sure I did right
this is my sketch
my answer was tan(theta) = 53/38 so theta was equal to tan inverse (53/38), is that right
yes it's correct
ok thank you
I understood everything up till the length of the Latus Rectum
How is it 4p?
and how would I find it?
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A3d9745da-ff64-4792-a3a7-a06de39af6eb so 6 is that the solution to f(0) gets passed to the division problem?
Can I have some insight on where to go from here?
I was thinking of bringing the cos over and factoring, but I don't think that's actually the next step?
I'm guessing in doing something wrong here too
Second one of right, there's no real solutions
So I got this equilateral triangle with sides of 7m, in which an ant from point C goes towards point A, while another ant goes from A to B. I need to find a function distance between them in terms of y (d(y) in the picture). I tried similarities of triangles, but didn't worked, didn't get the function as showed and not sure from were to start developing this function.
At any point in time, CD=AE (assuming both ants move at the same speed)
Then AD would be AC-CD
You know the angle at one of the corners of triangle DAE, you can use that to find the side DE, the result of the function d(y)
I used cosine law to find d(y), still getting sqrt(49-21y+3y^2)
I'm retarded or burned out 
Could the answer given be wrong?
,w simplify \sqrt{(7 - y)^2 + y^2 - y(7 - y)}
So the answer in the book wrong then
seems like it
i mean its already suspicious that they managed to get 7y^2 considering that there's only 3 terms
Didn't even want to consider it to be wrong, as it is taken from one of my countries exams 
literature is written by humans, mistakes are always possible
Agree 100% now
y=0
y=e would be a horizontal tangent line
without the "never touches" requirement
a graph can cross its own asymptote as many times as you wish
even infinitely many times
eg sin(x)/x
which function
Sorry wrong picture
The limit of this function exists, and it is +infinity right?
Then isn't theorum 1.2.4 b wrong?
Bec in the case of the 1st picture, p(a) ≠ 0 and q(a) == 0 but limit does exist
your book may consider an infinite limit as not existing
depending on the multiplicity of a as a zero of q, the limit might be ±∞ (even) or genuinely fail to exist (odd)
@willow bear o idk what you mean by limit may be even or odd but i think you mean(what my book explained) that the limit may be
A) +infinity from right and -infinity from left(or vice versa) hence limit does exist
B) plus or minus from both left and right so limit exists
And infact it shows a few examples behind with curves similar to this and says limit exists
Oh
let me rephrase
depending on the multiplicity of a as a root of q, the limit might be ±∞ (if the multiplicity is even, and depending on the signs of p(x) and q(x) for points close to a) or genuinely fail to exist (if the multiplicity is odd)
I gtg somewhere. Will check your answee when i come back I.A. idk tthe meaning of multiplicacy and zero of something lol
root
For this one why do you divide by 12?
I thought you only divide when it's compounded monthly but the question says annually
Is this ok ?
,rotate
if a function has an oblique asymptote then it can't have a vertical asymptote correct?
o ok tyvm
Okay guys, I can feel am not doing this correctly
Not inverse's
So why can I clear the x on the first one?
Not inverse's
<@&286206848099549185>
yes
I think I'm not doing this correctly
@willow bear (sorry for the late reply, im refering to the question i asked you earlier with two pics about limits)
Ok so i understood you partially that limit may be ±infinity or even fail to exist depending on situations but according to this picture, the limit does exist right? Because limit from left = limit from right = +infinity. And if the 2 one sided limits are equal, it means the actual limit exists and is equal to the one sided limits
@formal dome again your book seems to only consider a limit to exist when it is finite
@willow bear Hey
How do you rationalize or conjugate a fraction with a radical in the denominator
of which the index is not 2
like $\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{2} - 1}$?
Ann:
yes
hh
well in this particular case the "conjugate"\ is $(\sqrt[3]{2})^2 + \sqrt[3]{2} + 1$
Ann:
i guess
Ann:
or perhaps more generally $(x-a)(x^2 + ax + a^2) = x^3 - a^3$
Ann:
difference of cubes?
yes
thank you
$\frac{1}{2 - \sqrt[3]{x}}$
Successful:
@willow bear I am a little confused on how you would get the "conjugate"
I know it is (2x-1)(4x^2 + 2x +1)
but I don't understand how you come up with it
Ann:
so that the new denominator is $8-x$
Ann:
so my teacher was wrong? Lol
I only have the notes from his lesson
I didn't get that as my answer when I typed it into my calculator
I got 0.0001212
Also idk why the key says divided by 1575
<@&286206848099549185>
Result:
-4.4009344797457e-4
Alright thank you
^
oh ok
x-1 = 2/y
Are you trying to find the equation in terms of x
ye
$x=\frac{2}{y}+1$
AutisticAri:
thanks, more simple than I expected 😄
Ok I need more help xd
$y=\frac{x}{x-1}
$y=\frac{x}{x-1}$
NotLigmaMaster69:
need to find what x is again
what's your first step?
I just got to x=(x+y)/y
don't know what else to do cus otherwise I get that 1=y/y
which is true
,but not what I need
how are you getting the right side?
x-1=x/y
oh. you should leave the y on the left
hmm
x=-y+1?
can you show your work?
sec, gotta rewrite it then
kinda wrote it in a weird way
oh btw the 2nd line it's x=y(x-1)
what's the line below that?
1+(-x)=y
dunno where you're getting that
what do you get after distributing the y?
I'm still not following what ur doing.
what are you doing to both sides to reach that?
you are starting with
x = y*(x-1)
and the next step would be to distribute the y
elaborate please
a(b+c) = ab + ac
move all your x terms to one side
x-yx=-y
then factorise
go back a step and rewrite it more clearly first
simplify the negative to make it look nicer
x=y/-(1-y)
which is:
x=y/(-1+y)
Many thanks
np
unless you know tex, do:
sqrt( stuff )
Ah okay ty
So I had a question about this
When I solve this equation in the interval [0,2pi)
3secx+sqrt(3)=3sqrt(3)
Would I square it first?
Ok so
write sec in terms of cos
Ok
you should get 2 nice solutions
what happened to your equal sign?
you want to reach something resembling
trig function = constant
but then you'll have the trig function and constant on the same side,
so you should've moved the constants to the other side
usually for these types of questions, yes
And then I end up with
3/cosx = 2sqrt(3)
Couldnt I just have it in 3secx and divide by 3 on both sides?
you can,
but its usually easier to work in sin/cos/tan instead of their recipricals
you didn't manipulate that properly
what operations were you performing to isolate cos(x)?
I kept secx and divided 3 on both sides
And then I just did the reciprocal and got 1/cosx
if you were working in sec, then it would be
sec(x)=2sqrt(3)/3
that's the equation you need to solve,
there will be 2 solutions for x in [0,2pi)
unless you are very familiar with the sec
take the reciprical of both sides
Oh I get it
The cosx of that is
sqrt(3)/2
And the solutions would be
pi/6, 11pi/6
cosx of that is?
When you turn the secx into the cosx
yeh
Ok ty for helping
I need help with this, I looked up a guide and it still says the answer is wrong pls help
This is the method I used, but maybe there is a simpler way?
did you draw a diagram?
do you know what quadrant your point is in?
what is your "y"?
r = ?
to get the radius, then used that to get angle
sqrt(41) = r
but since it was decimal i left it as sqrt
sin(theta) = ?
(5)(sqrt(41))/41
the ratio of which 2 sides?
wym by that?
sin(theta) = opp/hyp = y/r right?
so i did, sin= y/r, so if y=5 and r=sqrt(41) then sin(5/sqrt(41)
y = -5
ye
-
also note that its Q4,
so sin(theta) should be negative
damn
you right
such a simple mistake, yeah i got the answer now thnx bro
feel kinda dumb for that one, been at it for a while and keep going back to check it
Does anyone know why this is wrong? I feel like I'm missing something
After factoting the equation I got: cos(t)=1 and cos(t)= -1/2
Ur missing a solution
Ok, I have 3 attempts left, the first 3 solutions i got them through a video I watched bc teacher hasnt explained this yet, does anyone know how to solve it?
All I know how to do from the video is, get the values of: cos(t)=1 and cos(t)= -1/2
Then I know that cos = x
so (1, 0) and (-1/2, 0) are the answers in the unitary circle
since (1,0) is on the same axis as "2pi" in the unitary circle, thats my first answer, and since (-1/2, 0) has "2pi/3" and "4pi/3" on the same value of "x" then those two are also answers
But thats as far as youtube video knowladge gets me on this one
t=0 is also a solution
Could someone check the thing I posted above
where does t=0 come from? in case i get it on my test
Oh bc you know cos(0)=1
Will I need to memorize the unit circle?
it will be useful for you later on if you do
Alright
Im still curious as to how he got that t=0, apart from him just knowing cos(0)=1, like did he just know or can that be "found" using the unit circle like I did with the rest of my answers?
unit circle helps
for real values of t, cos(t)=1 only when t is an integer multiple of 2pi
oh, and I suppose that goes for all of them not just cos
Then if I get that problem in a test I would have to use the unit circle for those, and then how would I find the ones not in it?
wdym not in it
Oh I thought u meant that "0" as the answer couldnt be found by looking at the unit circle
So I thought in other cases there might be more values of "t" that I wont be able to find by looking at the unit circle
t=0 is ONE solution but there are infinitely many
huh I see
thats why they limited it to [0,2pi]
and the unit circle only goes from 0 to 2pi for a total of 360 degrees
I think I understand now
the circle goes on and on. but after 2pi you start repeating stuff
Yeah, now it makes sense why they limited the question from [0,2pi]
What im getting from this is that from now on I'll use the circle to get all values from (0,2pi] then substitute t=0 and check if that is also an answer
and if they ask for values after 2pi, then I keep going with the circle repeating stuff like you mentioned
@brisk frigate certainly if they want a few more solutions beyond t=2pi then do that, but i don't recommend blindly plugging in t=0, i only used that because i know cos(0+2pi*n)=1 where n is an integer
okok Im not sure i understand the cos(0+2pi*n)=1 but prob bc im just starting, ill keep that in mind
$\cos(0)=\cos(2\pi)+\cos(4\pi)=...=\cos(2\pi n)=1$ where n is some integer
RokettoJanpu:
how do i know that cos(pi - 2x) is in the second quadrant
feel like you left out some details
My teacher assigning this as extra credit
I have to find out the amount of space my turkey hand occupies
What I’m thinking right now is box the entire thing and calculate the area and then calculate the areas that have gaps
Like between the fingers
Would that be the best way to do it?
turn ur hand into a square
easy A+
or
divide ur hand into triangles
@finite nimbus
Wouldn't the triangle method not work for the rounded edges of my finger?@scenic musk
i mean theres going to be approximations no matter which method u use
for ur fingers make rectangles
and if u really want
u can make a circle
for ur finger tips
ull need triangles in between to fill in gaps
its a lot of drawing and see what works
okay thanks
I gotta question ab finances
You borrow $33,850 to buy a car. You take a 6 year loan at 5.75% annual interest. For the first 2 years, you make the
minimum payment of $557.01. After two years, your financial institutions offer you the option to refinance for free (roll
the existing loan into a new loan with no added cost). Your new loan requires you to make monthly payments of
$425.62 for 5 years. What is the annual interest rate on your new loan? How much did you pay in interest of the 7
years?
I tried using future value to calculate how much is left for the final loan and got $36225.42
but then i used present value and gotta negative interest rate
@finite nimbus cut the hand out and weigh the paper
You can find the density of paper
And solve from there
engineer spotted
how do you find the point where two graphs or equations intercept?
i was figuring out how on the equations of both celsius and fahrenheit
for example, i have f=(9/5)C+32 for fahrenheit and the inverse of it for celsius.
@green zenith set those two equations equal to each other
and then?
then you have the intercept at (x, y)
@green zenith do you have the two equations?
paste them in here
Hello @vague zephyr, what have you tried so far?
I have not tried it at all due to my confusion as to where I should start
So since it's a polynomial of degree 3, it can have at most 3 roots. In this problem they list all the roots, by saying that there's a root with multiplicity 2 at x = 2 and a root of multiplicity 1 at x = -2
So your factors are (x - 2)(x - 2)(x + 2)
so from this i am supposed to create a polynomial equation
Yes, you can multiply the factors together and you'll get a polynomial. Although this polynomial will have a y-intercept of 0, so we'd have to shift it by -5.6 after all the factors are multiplied together
(x - 2) * (x - 2) = x^2 - 4x + 4
And then multiplying that by (x + 2), we get: (x^3 - 2x^2 - 4x + 8)
and then shift it by -5.6
so x^3 - 2x^2 - 4x + 2.4
Yes, nice
alright cool, thank you
yeah np
it says its wrong
Oh crap, sorry
The shift was wrong, that's all
It's supposed to be x^3 - 2x^2 -4x - 5.6
So the constant term has to be -5.6
x = 0 has to give you y = -5.6.
I'm kind of tired and must be making some mistakes, really sorry for messing that up. Let me see what went wrong
its all good
Oh okay
No constant shift, what we needed was a constant factor
so A*(x - 2)(x - 2)(x + 2) = y, we need to find A when x = 0 and y = -5.6
-5.6 = (-2)(-2)(2) * A
-5.6 = 8A
-5.6/8
Yup
so -.7
That's your function: (-5.6/8)(x - 2)(x - 2)(x + 2)
Yes
So you can also multiply them into that polynomial and then apply the * -0.7, or you might even be able to keep it all in factored form like this: -0.7 (x - 2)(x - 2)(x + 2)
Yep, that's it
thanks for the help
Sorry about that. So what I did earlier, adding a constant after finding the roots, actually changes your roots, so never do that haha
So whatever the polynomial f(x) is, it can be written as ((x - 6) * Q(x)) - 1
Where Q(x) is the quotient that you get by dividing f(x) by (x -6)
so then in this instance x-6 is being divided by f(6)
with a remainder of -1
so ((x-6)/6)-1?
or 6-6/6
-1
so would the answer just be -1
f(6) means you substitute 6 for all the x's, and since f(x) can be written as ((x - 6)*(Q(x)) - 1, you can plug in 6 for the x's and you get (0 * Q(6))) - 1, which is just -1
(1 - sin^2 A) - sin^2 A = 1 - sin^2 A - sin^2 A = 1 - 2 sin^2 A
there 2 comes from the remaining sin?
Yes
why aren't they subtracted tho? like (1-1=0)
They are subtracted, cos^2 A = (1 - sin^2 A), so both sin^2 A's have a negative sign
It's kind of the same thing as -(sin^2 A + sin^2 A)
ah ic thx.
yw
You're welcome 🙂
We appreciate what you do m8
Indeed there are however, I only have you to thank at the moment, they will get their turn too lol
haha thanks. That's it for me tonight, have a good night 🙂
Good night pal
$\tan^2\alpha$ can be arbitrarily large
EpicGuy4227:
identity $2\cos^2(x)-1=\cos(2x)$
RokettoJanpu:
thx
np
Hey is there anyone around that can help me with a few things?
whatcha need
The sin^2?
(1-2sin^2x)+sin^2x
Also I’m having trouble with complex numbers raised to the given power
combine like terms
which problem do you have, alpaka
oh shit. I forgot the -2 in front means the whole term is a negative right?
yes
-2 * (sin^2(x))
00f. thx boys and girls and other genders
-8 for the first or second problem
o
I changed it to polar
Oh, I'm unfamiliar with that
Oh
you you would also need to apply the power to the CiS
multiply their argument by 3
only the right side of the theorem but ok.
what do you end up getting?
I’m getting -8
that looks good.
although it still works, (due to odd an evenness of cos and sin)
the sign in between should be +
Oh
My book says it’s -
And for the problem below that it says the answer is just pi
Not 3pi
which #?
what was the original question asking for?
Polar form of the quotient
Oh do my radians need to be in between 0 and 2pi?
So I need to change 3pi to pi
did they specify a domain?
No
2CiS( pi + 2kpi) would have the same value
from just dividing (and nothing else), your expression is fine
I might have done this completely wrong
Would this be correct though, the book gives it in a different form but my instructor said I could do it this way but idk if I’m writing it correctly
is that meant to be the power of 3 or 1/3?
The question is asking to find the cube roots
what are you asked to do
Find the nth roots of the complex numbers for the specified value of n
I can’t be bothered to do nth roots
