#precalculus
1 messages · Page 156 of 1
thats why what @earnest nymph
That's why I the a^(3/6) term is so weird
Yeah
kk thanks
i wasted 3 hours
trying to solve this and compare it from the books answers
also @heady jewel is super high ego guy
made fun of me
He's is still fine
Actually to us indices is like high school level so it's weird to heard it from a guy who doing degree
Btw,what degree you taking anyway?
Ah
dude im on summer break right now but practicing math everyday
So have u take discrete math yet?
so i wanna be better at math
discrete != discreet
Oh sorry sorry
yeah i finished discrete math it was really easy for me compared to calculus
my fav math course is discrete
Nice
Well good luck and hope you get better
Erm... depends on the person
All depends on aptitude, dedication, and resources you use.
true
But don't pressure yourself if you took a longer time than others to master it
yeah
true
i got all these books from the library that ive been using
idk this work book that im using right now has 2 mistakes so far
it sucks
😂
and i waste time trying to do em
and it never works out lol
so yeah
what grade are you in big good
or college
uni
and amphy too
Khan academy is great to use as well
3rd year Mech E
nice
I finish A level, waiting to enter uni to start my degree
oh nice
good luck everyone
@earnest nymph why did you say not to make the negative exponents positvie btw?
in that question we were trying to do
You gonna have fractions within fractions
It's better to use the indices law (a^m)(a^n) = a^(m+n) and (a^m)/(a^n) = a^(m-n) to solve this
=tex \frac{\sqrt{a}\cdot \frac{1}{a^{\frac{2}{3}}}}{a^{\frac{3}{6}}}
=tex \frac{\frac{\sqrt{a}}{a^{\frac{2}{3}}}}{a^{\frac{3}{6}}}
Yes
ok
Odd functions multiplying with each other always turns into a even function right?
Yes
If I write formal proof on it.
Would It be reasonable to say the exponents are always even therefore the functions are even?
What the actual question?
@clever swallow no
you should use the definitions of an odd function and an even function
@willow bear I don't understand this
Ah
I have to know this in order to suck less
I think I can help
Since v (given) and g is constant, the only way to change R is to change theta
And R will be max if sin(theta) is max
I just can't understand why sin sin20<=1
,w plot sin x
look at the peak of the sin wave
^
It's 1 bruh
sin(x) is always between -1 and 1

$\sin 2\theta$ is less than or equal to $1$ because that's a property of the sin function lol
hegel:
Can a point be global and local max ?
yes
Yeap
Ok
in fact that's a characteristic of all extrema of sin functions
unless you are working over an interval but
w/ever not important
Yeah I asked because it's local max over some intervals asswell
it's a hyperbola as well
not quite
what is happening to ann
i am referring to her 1/2 1/4 and now 1/8 .__.
Zeno Paradox?
but where are the other 3/4s of ann , are they gone already and if not where do we store them, we're gonna need to store them for quite some time
IN the above they say {(x-1)(x+4)}/{x-3} is equivalent to (x-1)(x+4)(x-3)<0
How is this valid ?
Wot ?
I don't got u ?
I think it's a rypo
@willow bear can you read the solution and tell if it's correct
the one you posted from your book?
Yes
yes it is correct
How 🤔
how what
i mean, starting from (x-1)(x-4)/(x-3) < 0, you can multiply both sides by (x-3)^2, a quantity which is positive for all x besides 3
the inequality is not defined for x=3 anyway
,rotate -90
ok, what is giving you trouble here @opaque shard
what are a and b
Coefficient of sin and cos
...
what
what are you even talking about
$-\sqrt{a^2 + b^2} + \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}$ is just 0
Ann:
but this is not in the form $a \cos(\theta) + b \sin(\theta)$.
How to apply this in case of mod
Ann:
so what you sent does not apply.
of this FUNCTION.
Yes
What's that
just use | | on your keyboard
if you ever have a calculator without absolute values just use sqrt(x^2)
you really need a calc for abs values? 
no, if you have them inside a calulation and are too lazy to think
Lmao
thinking is difficult it takes effort


Recall your trig identities
shouldn't shifting the point (-4,2) to (0,0) be the same as shifting the point (2,2) to (0,0)?
yep, since it's a periodical function with a period of 6
I wrote a formula of shifting f(x) from (2,2) to (0,0) and it was marked wrong. What did I do wrong with the formula?
you may not have simplified
it's likely it resulted in something like cos(x+2pi)
where you can just cut the 2pi out
i see up there you wrote $\frac{\pi}{3} - \frac{2\pi}{3}$ rather than $-\frac{\pi}{3}$
wot
hegel:
you forgot the x, for one thing
oh yeah lol
there is a minus sign I see that we can bring back into the log which will simplify the 1/2
$\log_{a}(b^{n})=n\log_{a}(b)$
⚡Amphy⚡:
so 1/2 would have the -1 as the exponent?
yes
okay
and (1/2)^{-1} is?
2
good
thanks

what does it mean by base e?
e^
so e^7=16?
Tuong:
tyson can u send a pic of more of the question?
you need to use change of base formula
that's something kinda important you should know about already
i tried using natural log but answer turned out wrong
Can you show your working?
I don't know? Type it out?
MS Paint
Take a picture
@viscid thistle do you have your working on a piece of paper or what
If you understand the ln and e properties you can isolate t
i have no idea what to do v.v i plugged it into a calculator but all i got was this
hi
"To draw the graph plot all points corresponding to x-intercepts, minima and maxima within one cycle"...
I know that
So the time at which bib is 50% ahead of alice
Is
5t=1.5*3(t+20)
So t=180sexond
Seconds
Assume that the arthimetics is correct 
$f(2x)=\frac 2{2+\frac 12\times(2x)}$ for all $x>0$
Tuong:
I mean what I exactly wrote
lol
2f(x)=4/2+x
krishna, you're given f(2x), not f(x)
so if $g(x) = 2x$ then $(f \circ g)(x) = \frac{2}{2 + \frac12 g(x)}$
because that's what we were given

we know f(2x), he let 2x = g(x) and thus we know f(g(x))
this isnt really necessary intuition though
we can see
$f(2x) = \frac{2}{2 + x}$
Namington:
and we're trying to figure out what f(x) was
the (2x) meant that, whenever we had an x in the original f(x)
we replaced it with 2x
so let's look for everywhere there's a 2x
$\frac{2}{2 + x}$ can be rewritten as $\frac{2}{2 + \frac{1}{2}\cdot 2x}$
Namington:
so, $f(2x) = \frac{2}{2 + \frac12 \cdot 2x}$
Namington:
as i said above, f(2x) is f(x) with all the x replaced with 2x
so let's go backwards
replacing the 2x with x
$f(x) = \frac{2}{2 + \frac{x}{2}}$
Namington:
we can check our work by plugging in 2x and seeing that we get our original f(2x)
now, find 2f(x)
and we're done.
I just need a quick refresher, when finding the coordinates of a negative angle, they are the same as the angle's positive, but flipped to the diagonal quadrant?
They are the same as the positive angle, but the y value if multiplied by -1
You are going down instead of going up
$N := 10a + b; ; a, b \in { 0, 1, ..., 9} \
P(N) = ab \
S(N) = a + b$
Ann-iversaire:
fuck simon and fuck his favorite factoring trick

You can't disrespect that guy
Is the number 09
$ab+a+b=10a+b \implies -9a+ab=0 \implies a(-9+b)=0 \implies a=0 ,b=9$
My homies are good at math:
you meant a = 0 OR b = 9, ok
and a can't be 0 since that'd make the number single-digit
N IS 9
no
they asked for the unit digit of N, not N itself
N can be 19, 29, 39, etc up to 99
but its units digit, which is what you were asked for, is 9
I know this is quite easy, but I've been working at it for some time and can't come up with an answer choice that's provided. Someone mind walking me through it?
I did
Show
tan=opposite side /adjacent side
I know how to solve it, I'm just not getting an answer that's provided
,w tan27°
lol
You are not overrated lol
why does it say 191
hm wait actually
That's the hint nunber
there
oxide the lad
lad
@rugged ice $24.8\approx24.5$
My homies are good at math:
How 🤔 ðŸ˜
¯_(ツ)_/¯
@rugged ice 
im too exhausted to redo the assignment
sitting down and doing online work every day is killing me
lol

hilarious
all these molecules being synthesised to make you move
Lmao
problem is hard
It's hard it's very hard ðŸ˜
@viscid thistle cat how did you become so good at problem solving
i did not
ok nerd
@karmic topaz nerd
ok

$\csc^{2}(x) = \frac{1}{\sin^{2}(x)}$ and $\sin^{2}(x) + \cos^2(x) = 1$, so how come $\csc^{2}(x) \neq \frac{\sin^{2}(x) + \cos^{2}(x)}{\sin^{2}(x)}$
Cirno:
am i having a retard moment?
oh yeah i am
thats just 1 + cot^2(x)
many such cases
The position of particle moving along the x-axis varies with time t according as $x=a\sin(\omega*t+\theta_0)$
Where $a,$ $\omega$ and $\theta_0$ are constant.($\omega$ is non zero )
Let $x_1$ and $x_2$ be the position of the particle at different time instants $t_1$ and $t_2$ respectively. Find $t_1-t_2$ if\
a)$x_1=x_2$ \
b)$x_1-x_2=2a$ \
The answer of a) and b) are $\frac{2k\pi}{\omega}$, k is an integer) and $\frac{(2t-1)\pi}{\omega}$ , t is an integer
My homies are good at math:
You can only use unit circle to answer this question
@shrewd urchin
f(5,2) = 19
i know, i solved it in front of you
amazing
Wassap
So my teacher just asked us to construct a graph for x^4-36y^2=0 and wolframalpha just pooped out a 3d graph
Halp
probably because you left out the = 0 part
lmao rip onion
youre in class?
yea rip onion
,w range of f(x)=3\sqrt{2x-7} -8
,w domain of f(x)=3\sqrt{2x-7} -8
Could anyone help me solve for x?
what's giving you trouble here ?
im not very good with logs so im just getting confused
do you know properties of logarythms?
Like, what happens when you add or subtract them when they have the same base?
ye sorry thats what i meant
but you are dealing with a subtraction here
$\log_a x + \log_a y = \log_a xy$
dog:
$\log_a x - \log_a y = \log_a \frac{x}{y}$
dog:
try to use this
well, why do you think that
Coz they have told that ♧ and ♡ is commutative and if they are commutative then ◇ has to be commutative @vernal anchor
y◇x=(y♧x)♡{x♧y} which is totally equivalent to x◇y
exactly
What if only heart was commutative?
It was a question to krishna ugh..
That's a pity
How a beautiful day
im wondering why this question has a star next to it
cause it's * hard *
in (a) star is a binary operation though
but ok
im currently taking some CS class and the prof is rating hw with chilis
(d) star Suppose...... = ?
from 0-3 chilis
Mmh that's enigmatic
(d) seems just as hard as the other questions though
rate the problems with mniip's heads
it's just mind tricks on the students
it confused Krishna so much, he had to ask for confirmation
does the star mean it's hard?
Yes @vernal anchor
But it wasn't hard at all
I was just confused why they gave * for such an easy problem
I have an exercise and it's simply
x^2 -4xy +8y^2 +4x -4y +6 = 0
what kind of conic is this?
@eternal crown wait i might take back what i said. im not sure whats going on with the -4xy term
yeeeees that's what's giving me trouble, I only know the kinda "simply" way
I saw some matrix were involved but I have no clue of how to use t hem
that's why I asked in linear algebra
do you have a screenshot or picture of this question?
it's in portuguese but it's what I said
the conics and degenerations are the alternatives
according to desmos it would be a unique point. hmm its not that obvious to me tho. You said the solution used matrices?
weird no idea how they came up with that. I think you could ask #linear-algebra if you want. You should probably add the given answer for context tho.
if only I had it
had what?
the answer
this is how they present it tho: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/363224154469826562/598371510935224320/21857f15e486a1fc900c583afe2689b5e729a60d.png
post that
I don't understand how I'm supposed to get a second answer here, can someone explain?
In the first and second quadrants
check again
Positive in what regard?
Where the output of tan(x) is positive
There are two quadrants where that will happen
It's positive in the first and second quadrants on my graphing calculator
What signs do cosine and sine have in quadrant 2?
I don’t know
You know of the unit circle though? That is why I ask you to refer to that.
A bit I guess, but I still don't understand what I'm supposed to do.
Do you know how x and y are related to cosine and sine on the unit circle?
Yes
And now consider quadrant 2
What sign will x values have?
What sign will y values have?
X will be negative, Y will be positive
Then tan will be positive or negative?
Negative?
Remember that tan(x)=sin(x)/cos(x)
So the tan(x) will be negative in quadrant 2
So let’s look for when both x and y are negative, that will give a positive value for tangent
So quadrant 3
1 and 3
Correct, very good
To get from an angle in quadrant 1 to quadrant 3 you add how many radians?
I like to think of tanθ as the slope of the line between the origin and (x,y)
That is all
pi/2?
not pi/2
or 2pi
it will take more than pi/2
well try this
draw an angle in quadrant 1
and now extend the ray so that it is in quadrant three
I don't have graphing paper on me right now
we can use wolfram to illustrate this then
let's take a 45 degree angle then
,w graph y=x from 0 to 1
that forms a 45 degree angle
and now to form that same angle in quadrant, I just mirror this line about the origin
,w graph y=x from -1 to 1
so that is a 45 degree angle in quadrant 1 and quadrant 3
and how far apart are the angles from each other?
this line forms a ? angle
180 degrees
which is how many radians?
pi
very good
so you solve tan(x)=2.75 for x in radians I am assuming, and then to get a second answer you will do what?
Add pi
yes, and can you tell me why you do that?
To find the value on the other end? I don't know.
Can you explain to me again why there are two values for tan(x)=2.75 in the first place, and how to find the second value once you solve for the first value, which will be in quadrant 1 when you use a calculator to solve it
There are two values because of the unit circle, we find the second by adding pi, finding its other positive equivalent
can you be more specific about the unit circle part
I don't think I can
I mean we talked about just 10 or so minutes ago
you should review our convo to see why it was quadrant 1 and 3
It's on the equivalent place on the opposite half of the circle?
I was looking for you to explain why tangent is positive in those two quadrants
Because both X and Y are positive in quadrant one, and they're both negative in quadrant three; resulting in positive answers
very good
don't forget to say that on the unit circle, cos(x) is represented as the x coordinate, and sin(x) is the y coordinate
i think this is a precalc q but how would i solve sin x = 1/2
i know the answer is 60 degrees bc i guess and checked but can someone teach me the official way
it depends on what you'd call the 'official way'
wait is it 60 degrees?
and yeah it's 30
can you teach me how to solve it
if you're not using calculus or anything like that to solve it, you'd use trigonometry
how so
you'd draw a right triangle and make it such that according to the definition of a sine
the length of the hypotenuse and the non-adjacent side to the angle would have a ratio of 2:1
yeah pretty much like that
what does the left side say?
anyways that's a special triangle, and you can duplicate the triangle and flip it over
that would make an equilateral, and since the angle we're looking for is the half of an angle of an equilateral, the angle is 30 degrees
you can use this geometric method only for special cases where the angle would be 30, 45, or 60
which is why you only memorise the sine for the three angles
is it 30 degrees bc the opposites of the shorter sides of the triangle is the smaller degrees?
how do I do this word problem 😦
sorry, i don't know what you mean by tha
it is
@spark cliff so that should be enough evidence to solve it wouldnt it
um idk
200 feet!!
is it actually 200 feet wait
cause that’s what I actually got
hm
idt thats a precalc q tho
i think its geometry
i did that last year i forgot lol
yes, it is a 45-45-90 triangle, so the legs are equal in magnitude
@quick dagger one thing to note is that that equation has more than one solution
yeah but that's only for people who think adding 2pi is a solution that isn't nominal
no, within the scope of a triangle's angles, or 0 to 180 degrees
there's only one solution for all trig functions
@limpid moss so its not 60? for sin x = 1.33
if you meant sin x = 1/1.33, then yeah there would be a different answer for that
you might think of it in words: what is the angle such that if you take it's sine, you obtain 1/2 @quick dagger
if you memorized your trig values, this should be easy
there's only like 3 of them anyways
who memorises angles other than 30 45 and 60
what trig values?
yeah
mostly until you start using calculators for trig functions
trigonometry will mostly be just another way to force you to do calculations you don't want to do
?
cos(60) = 1/2
ok
er
do you know the identity sin^2 + cos^2 = 1
sin(30) = 1/2
i learned this in alg 2
i didnt
oh
yeah i don't know what precalc
only graphing sine and cosine
same^
if i asked you what tan(45) is could you tell me?
no
why would u expect me to know i said i dont know nothing about this
its just in my ap physics packet for some reaosin
and i havent learned it yet
uh
yeah you will need more of an introduction to trig before you tackle problems like sin(x) = 1/2
try using khan academy or another website on your own time
kk
sorry computer is s l o w
tbh i'd start here
if you only have experience drawing sin and cosine waves
just click the first article
you can skip over smething if you already know it
@long pond and this will teach me how to solve sin x = 1/1.33?
well, eventually
if you can't tell me what basic trig values are, you will have to def. learn that
this is a streamlined and organised method
@long pond what is sin x = 1/1.33 question name ?
like what category does that q fall under
hold on, I may have to give you something else as well
this goes into how to solve trig equations
the category is using arcsin on calculator
but before you do this, you should be familiar with the basic trig function and what you can do with them
when i go into ap physics, would i have to learn trig?
@long pond bc if i am then ill spend a lot of time learning it now
if i dont have to learn then ill prob just not fully learn it
I can't imagine you wouldn't need to know trig in an upper level physics class
maybe not super in depth, but probably more than you know nw
now*
why would the teacher give us this q when we havent even taken precalc
i mean it is ap physics but like we didnt get a textbook
idk
@long pond she did give us a warning on the front page saying to watch videos and reearch unknown concepts
and that ill be tested on it when i go back to school
so i might as well learn trig then
yeah i would do that
Should I remember all these circles? or should I be able to get these answers on my own
my trig knowledge is very minimal
this is a pre-calc class
What is expected of the student here?
@zealous sail
Memorize sin, cos, and tan of the special angles
For example, sin(5Ï€/6) = 1/2, using that diagram
The second part of the piece wise isn’t even right?
Because it’s negative if u replace x with a negative?
Any idea how to solve this?
Well then keep thinking
ok

If a person is thinking for more than 30 minutes and he doesn’t have a solution yet help him.
@rare galleon hey I've been stuck on this research problem for two weeks, can you help me
been working on a solution to RH, any help?
@pale kettle way different mate, but good try.
@pale kettle are you actually doing reu
I am doing
you're not even an undergraduate
reu stands for research experience for undergraduates
now cease your trolling
oi boys
oi not man ??
Soap you doing physik
yea

People who ask to ask must be banned
no ?
was that it ??
ok lets get to the real question then
Soap is physik hard ? For u
yea man
Ok let me imagine how hard it would be for me 
brother
yeh
Soap is it really hard or u joking
i learnt precalc from khan academy and look at me i can multiply two number like it nothing
😤
😔
Professor Leonard is always a good choice
Hi
Can i have help with part (ii) please?
also i think this should be pre calc(?)
yep
but how does that explain if L is rational, therefore roots are rational?
is it since if L isn't rational, you can't form a perfect square?
let me think
Yeah
If L is not rational then the roots are not rational true
$x=\frac{-b\pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$
Krishna:
If b is not rational then how will the roots be rational @quasi forum
I think the quadratic formula itself answers your question
well it's not hard to show L rational => rational roots
$x=\frac{-b}{2a} \pm \frac{\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$
Krishna:
the discriminant would just be $$L^2-4M = L^2-\frac 89 L^2 = \left(\frac 13 L\right)^2$$
emeric75:
(using part one for the first equality)
ie discriminant is rational
so indeed roots are rational
so by proving L is rational, therefore roots are rational?
but isn't the question worded slightly differently?
i'm not sure if they want the equivalence or just the way i did
Like i get your reasoning
In which grade are you in
yea
Krishna:
D is rational but roots aren't
Or that rules works only if a,b,c are rational number
D?
Discriminant
well we also know that L is rational in the q
oh wait
since we know L is rational
we can use discriminant
hence, roots are rational
^plus everything else i skipped on 😃
$x=\frac{-L\pm\sqrt{L^2-4M}}{2}$
Krishna:
hm?
@viscid thistle I am actually doing reu?
@quasi forum did you learn vietas formulas yet?
Can you say anything about the two right triangles?
they're similar triangles
So you can use proportions to set up an expression that includes x then solve for x
would it just be x=(rt/h)-t?
I didn’t work it out, no idea lol
oh but u start with r/x+t=h+t and then just solve for x
yea lol
Ok you have the correct starting proportion
like one triangle equals the other cause theyre similar
Will assume you did the algebra correct
ok thanks
Then x is equal to what you got
yep
this is surely precalculus
the point with the smaller x coordinate
The leftmost intersection will be the one with less positive x coordinate.
but how do I find that number?
I have the equation of the line and circle, i just don't know how to find the smallest x-coordinate without guess and check
OH LMAO i was making them equal each other facepalm
i really went brain dead after exams
Guys
I got a real quick question
Mm
Can I skip ellipse and hyberbola and goto limits
It's for physics
Ok
conic help you at a better understanding and pure understanding of calc tho
i mean if you want to do it for the sake of problem solving
skip conics
I want to understand only for physics
I am doing first course on physics
It's a basic one but needs a little bit of calculus
If I need ellipse and hyper bola I will learn it later
like kinematics and other shi?
Yes
like newtons laws
Yup
ok then just study basic calc
its all you need
standard integration,derivatives and easy limits
Khan acamdey has a basic course in that
Like math for physics
Also I want to know basics of calculus
Because I will do some math after 2 months that need a little calculus .
while you learn the true meaning of derivative
you will have a lot of fun
its satisfaction know how shit goes on in very small places
Differential coefficient
whats that
oh ok
I never bothered to learn comic sections
Hmm

Even I am skipping it
Boi @heady jewel ? Are you there ?
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/in-in-class11th-physics/in-in-11th-physics-differentiation
Here is the course of basic calculus can you tell if this is enough for physics
This is the link .
how do you do this one?? i feel like theres something about angles here i dont know about that im missing 
I have my vote on what the answer is
think carefully about those restrictions on the angles and the two relations you have
ohhh wait
its like that thing where sin60 and sin 120 are equal
but cos60 and cos120 are not because one is negative
so it has to be C
right? 
thinking it's that as well
since theta is between 0 and pi/2, its sine and cosine are gonna be positive
so you can safely say phi is in the second quadrant
but how are you sure its pi - theta and not pi/2 + theta? theyre both in the second quadrant
frick, I was stuck between the two as well
remember, one of those returns the same trig function
??? but if you add 90 degrees to 60 degrees thats not 120
He’s more or less asking you to justify which one it is
The above is one such justification, albeit numerical, though still valid.
Well it’s partly a justification, to complete the reasoning you have to show that sin(φ)=sin(θ) and
cos(φ)=-cos(θ) is correct when φ=π-θ, and incorrect if you choose π/2 + θ
That’s fine
ok im not exactly sure what im doing but ill give it a shot
since the first restriction says theta must be between 0 and 90 degrees, sin and cos both must be positive
but the second restriction says Φ is between 0 and 180 degrees, so while sin is positive, cos must be either positive or negative
looking at the top half of the unit circle, the coordinates are nearly the same on both sides if you look at similar angles like 30 vs 150
ohhhh fuck
whoops
but they still need to be similar angles like 30 and 150 for the condition to be true
idk whats the real term for it
you cant get that "matching" degree by adding 90
is that how to explain it or am i missing something
ool
"Use the fundamental identities to write the first
expression in terms of the second." What do I do with the Quadrant VI part?
Quadrant IV* woops
use the fact that sin and tan are negative for angles from that quadrant
and cos isn't
sorry im still kinda confused on what to do with that information. Tan t would turn into sin t/cos t, and cos t would turn into the square root of 1=sin^2 right?
so it being in quadrant IV just means its positive?
cos(t) = √[1 - sin²(t)]
If in Q4
woo woo im teaching myself precalc this summer for the upcoming class
I have a question about constrictions of the unit circle. Is it just memorizing or is there logic behind why arctan, arccos, arcsin are constricted to lilke
tan quadrants I and IV
cosine I and II etc
idk if im asking this correctly either
wut
if ure talkinga bout the sign or value then its clear from the graphs of the function
,w plot cosx
@autumn marsh there is logic to it. You can actually construct it by hand if you wanted to
ill send a pic of my notes
and thats what i thought
I was trying to connect it with ASTC but it didnt make sense to me
However this is math. Most of everything can be done via logic but memorization is faster
the highlighted stuff
yeah very true XD
i feel like its simple and im overthinking it cuz i tend to do that and make it harder than it rlly is
Study trig
this is the very beginning of the stuff in the precalc thing im doing, do you think once i practice problems and go further into it ill understand better?
I was pretty solid with trig in alg II
You dont have a good grasp of trig from what I seen already
quadrant 6
Mainly the restrictions are because of when you graph the inverse it has to fit the vertical line test
^ that actually registers in the brain
There ya go then
we didnt learn everything in trig @river kindle plus my teacher sucked so i went through hell tryna understand. We missed a lot of stuff for alg II in general but i got high 90s on all the tests for it
a lot of the stuff in precalc regarding trig is a lil different than what im used to seeing
Khan Academy is the best self teaching source until you get to calculus imo
thats what i be usin to take notes and what i used to fill in gaps by my teacher
Use Khan to fill in the gaps
he somehow is allowed to teach precalc honors and im glad im not taking it
hes horrible
i have 5 missing test grades and i asked him to put them in and he said no
literally said nah
We had a bio teacher so bad he got banned from teaching honors and AP
And we had a physics teacher so bad he got banned from AP Physics
Yea he's allowed to teach, just only regular level classes
thats icky
my alg teacher made people cry too, he aint the best but idk i feel bad for him too sometimes
we had a sub for like a month and she taught the class for 15 years before he had
loved her, very enthusiastic and loved what she was teaching, also rlly strict and on topic
my style of teacher precisely
@autumn marsh my algebra teacher threw a desk across the room into a wall once. In either case, my comment was judt me saying get a trig textbook or cheaper or free alternative to brush up on it
Algrebra only scratches the surface
That is what i am doing at least for college precalc
mmk i was just saying im good at alg II trig XD and ill look for some textbooks
Gotta bring that exponent down first; know how to go about that?
how do i do that?
Log both sides


