#precalculus
1 messages · Page 155 of 1
mohad12211:
im trying to understand that concept more.
it it's x+4 my bad
so this crosses the imaginary plane at 1,0 twice?
but even if I don't get that 100% it's not super important I don't understand how to distribute all those terms together to get the polynomial
whenever I do it I wind up with i's that didnt cancel
the zeroes are 1+i and 1-i
on the complex plane they are (1,1)(1,-1)
$(x+4)((x-1)^{2}-i^2)$
mohad12211:
$(x+4)(x^2-2x+1)-i^2)$
mohad12211:
mohad12211:
so you have to do the imaginary ones first
don't worry calc 1 is not that hard lol
,help
A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs! Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!
yeah... the hard part of calculus is algebra 😂
id say the hardest part of calculus is the word problems
"application" problems that is
^
this might sound like a dumb question but if you’re writing the inequality w >= -8 in interval notation i know it’s (-8,infinity) but how do you know which parenthesis would be a bracket
whichever it’s pointing to?
no, it'd be [-8, +∞).
square brackets mean the endpoint is included
round brackets mean the endpoint is not included
but why is it not infinity]
because infinity isn't a real number
oh
is (x^-3y^4/5)^-2 simplified 25x^6/y^8
do you mean $\left( \frac{x^{-3}y^4}{5} \right)^{-2}$
Ann:
if so, yes
yeah wrong parenthesis whoops thank you
DarK:
it also looks bizarre with the bracket pointing outwards
it looks like something you could impale yourself on

reverse brackets 
so french are sadists @willow bear
$\big]-\infty;+\infty\big[$
DarK:
Impale yourself on both infinities
when you're doing synthetic division
of lets say a 6th degree polynomial by a third degree polynomial that is factorable
can I factor the third degree and synthetically divide using each of the two factors one at a time?
or does it not work like that
wdym
it does not work like that i'm afraid
$\frac{2x^4 - x^3 + 9x^2}{x^2 - 4}$
Ann:
i cant just run synthetic divison with 2 and negative 2
no
one by one then right?
ah ok
I noticed that when they were factors it was working out
$x<18/{x-3}$
burnt toast:
we’ll go with it
so can you multiply by x-3 to eliminate the denominator
and then divide by 3
did you mean $x < \frac{18}{x-3}$
Ann:
if so, no, you cannot multiply both sides by x-3, because x-3 is not sign-constant.
the very first thing you should do whenever you encounter a rational inequality is to bring everything to one side and write it as a single fraction
then factor everything as far as possible
then make a sign table
ok have you ever solved any rational inequalities before
ok have you ever solved any polynomial inequalities before
yeah
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfnVHwhEe6U here i found you a video
This precalculus video tutorial provides a basic introduction into solving rational inequalitites using a sign chart on a number line and expressing the solu...
thank you
can someone help me find the center and radius of the function x^2 +y^2 -6x=7
complete the square on x^2-6x
hmmmm y^2 isnt included?
no that separate if we are trying to get into a form like
(x-h)^2+y^2=r^2
not sure how you got 5
ignore the y^2 it's already in the form (y-b)^2
you want to convert x^2-6x into a form (x-a)^2
and you are allowed to add/subtract numbers
have you learnt completing the square
nah
well we can add numbers to both sides of the equation x^2-6x+y^2=7
expand (x-a)^2 and try equate it to x^2-6x
to get started
ohh thanks ill try
huh i dont get it
wait
i literally lose because of the y^2
y^2 is already in the form (y-b)^2, you don't need to work on it, why is it giving you trouble
a circle with centre (a,b) and radius r has the equation (x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=r^2
so i can also write it down as (y-0)^2
inb order to avoid confusion
sorry if im to slow 😦
you \textit{can} multiply both sides by $4$, but you will \textbf{not} get $\frac{3}{x} + \frac{2}{x} = 5$.
Ann:
yes
sure
is that ‘sure’ you’re wrong but i’m gonna let you realize it’s wrong so you learn or ‘sure’ that’s correct lol
it’s +5x whoops
without using a calculator, how would you know 351 is a multiple of 3?
is there some clever way to check for something like this when reducing fractions?
there are theorems about that
3+5+1 = 9, which is divisible by 3
so 351 is divisible by 3
^^
If the sum of a number's digits is divisible by 3, then the number is divisible by 3
Same with divisibility by 9
wow thank you
it's an iff
Hush
it's a very cool thing
if is fine
,w factor 2y^2-28y+98
Why does it hold for a polynomial f(x) that it is divisible by (x-1)^3 only if f(1)=f'(1)=f''(1)=0?
well
which direction do you want first
divisible by (x-1)^3 implies condition on derivatives
or condition on derivatives implies divisible by (x-1)^3?
divisibility implies the derivative zeros
ok
well
let f(x) = g(x)(x-1)^3
for g a polynomial
i invite you to differentiate this twice and verify that f(1), f'(1) and f''(1) are all zero
while i disappear for about 15 minutes
@autumn sonnet have you done what i invited you to do? and does that direction of your iff statement require any further clarification?
...
Yeah I saw why it works, thanks. I wonder if this is the case with any polynomial divisible by (x-n)^m
yes, a polynomial $P(x)$ is divisible by $(x-r)^m$ iff $P^{(k)}(r) = 0$ for $0 \leq k \leq m-1$. this works for any real (or complex) number $r$ and positive integer $m$
Ann:
this is more appropriate for #calculus
also, taking the deravative of 5^t would give = ln(5) 5^t . and you have that 1/ln(5) to cancel the extra factor out essentially
Okay, now is there some way we can make the left side simpler?
think harder

suspicious
um yea sinx but it doesnt help 😡
i tried it
i thought this was trig identites bruh idk what to even do rip
What are the solutions to the equation x(2-x)=0?
what can you say about a and b?
So then what are the solutions to your equation
no
h(t) = cot t
find the slope at the interval pi/4 to 3pi/4
is it undefined
cuz cot pi/4 is N/A no?
cot(pi/2) is also defined.
@fallen swallow did you figure it out?
that cot is reciprocal
so if it tan is undef at pi/2 which is 1/0
the recip 0/1 is defined
because were not diving by 0 anymore
yes the image is wrong
well thanks
CaptainLightning:
^
sorry is the conjugate here sqrt5h +4 +2?
yes
oh thanks!
Can someone help me with a trig problem. I can't figure it out. I have to find all answers between [0, 2pi) for the equation cos2x - sinx = 0
I have narrowed this down to -sin^2x - sinx + 1 = 0
But I can't factor this for the life of me
<@&286206848099549185> I'm sorry to ping you but I need to finish this question before I can finally sleep
I think I might have gotten it
Call sin(x) a new variable, y
y^2 + y - 1 = 0
You’ll need to use quadratic formula to get the roots
I solved it
I was too tired to realize how factoring works
it is -(2sinθ-1)(sinθ+1) = 0
is this intermediate step correct or is there a different way I should be thinking about this
the solution went from one the top to the bottom so maybe there's another way to look at it?
cool ty
Wrong channel
How do I find an arithmetic progression difference? I've tried using negative the first and last term in the sum formula, but that didn't work.
@autumn sonnet common difference is just the difference between two consecutive terms. You can find it depending on what you're given with. Do you have a problem or something where you are stuck at?
I meant the difference of the entire progression
As in each term subtracted from the next
Yes, the common difference
So like if we have 1, 3, 5, 7, 9
The common difference is 2
As 3-1=2, and 5-3=2, and 7-5=2...
Is that what you mean?
Oh wait, do you mean
If we like take a series and convert it from addition to subtraction?
Yes
can someone help with break equation?
Just a question, I am going to go pre-calculus H next year and was wondering what topics I should review or learn to be prepared
trig will be a big focus of the course
Isn’t it more like limits and continuity, derivatives, integrals, etc
that's calc
(although limits and basic derivatives are sometimes introduced in precalc.)
hmm, the first chapter? are you sure this is a precalc book?
This year we did mainly transformations, logs, trig(unit circle, identities)
that sounds like precalc.
¯_(ツ)_/¯
I heard people in precalc learn the same
the names i'm using are the north american names
Alright
no idea what you are going to learn in calc if you call this precal
calculus in the US is traditionally split into
calc 1 and calc 2
then multivariable and diff eqs
calc 1 is limits, derivatives, and basic integrals
calc 2 is more integrals, solids of rotation, etc
and both have applications.
Does calc 1 expand from algebra 2
it builds off it, yes
they're generally considered separate subjects, but
calc uses algebraic techniques heavily
many students comment that the algebra is the hardest part of calculus.
(or maybe the trig)
yeah, it comes to everyone differently; trig in calc mainly comes up in using identities in integration
Isn’t integration like area under curve and between 2 curves
thats the geometric intuition, yeah
the nice bit - and the part that ties it to differential calculus - is that the integral is the inverse of the derivative
Is differential calc the same as multi
Ok
i know in AP calculus, at least for calc BC, there isn't much of a distinction between calc 1 in 2, but that may have just been my class
Calc bc covers both
more integration techniques , series and i think polar coord
Any idea where I should begin in this?
memes:
Whoever:
hey how could i find the asymptotes of x.(e to the 1/x)
isn't it (ln b)/(ln a)?
yes.
lol
who else is a highschool precalc yeet?
Yeet

n is an arbitrary integer
?
n is any whole number
this says that the graph of y = cot(x) has asymptotes
...
x = -3pi
x = -2pi
x = -pi
x = 0
x = pi
x = 2pi
x = 3pi
...
and so on
I know how to do this, I'm just fried beyond belief and can'r work anymore. Someone mind helping out?
Do things slowly, step by step
Just give it to me, I can barely remember my name at this point
Probably should take a break from math then
It’s literally just this problem then I’m done
I’ll walk you through it but I won’t give you the answer
That’s fair
Move it to be the exponent of the 5
Perfect
Let’s make that log(b)125 then
On the Right side, what can we do when we have two logs subtracting
Turn them into a fraction
A bit too fried for that one, chief. But, I’m assuming we can simply divide or multiply to simplify?
Hmmm let’s take an extra step then
Let’s move the right side to the left to make it equal 0
So logb 125 - logb (4/y) = 0
You tell me the next step
Turn the subtracting logs into a fraction again?
Yep
It’s gonna be a bit ugly, but keep it organized and it will work out
Can you tell me what we get after you make the newest fraction
logb(125/(4/7)
b?
Yep
(125/(4/7)) = b^0
Hopefully you know anything to ^0 = 1, after that it’s just algebra which I know you can do
Also that 7 is a y
0.032 or 4/125
Perfect!
good job man
I honestly regret deciding to take this class this summer. I’m already loaded with ap summer work for us history and lang
I don’t know how to give myself a break
Is this preAP Calc?
i need help with a math problem
i nned to find out the displacement spped of a new yorker falling out of the world trade center
it is very important
It’s honors pre cal
Ah Canadian here so not quite sure your system but I have a good idea
Well best of luck to you man :)
Pi/2?
Tanx = sinx/cosx
So what values of x will make it go to infinity, well the numerator never goes to infinity, only -1 to 1, so we want the denominator to approach 0
Cos x is 0 at Pi/2
is that a yes?
sorry i mean is π always an asymptote of any cotangent function
Do the same reasoning I did and try and prove it to yourself
If the formula for a single term in binomial progression (x+y)^n is (n k) * x^n-y * y^k is the formula for (x-y)^n = (n k) * x^k * y^n-k?
ok first off
the terms in the expansion of $(x+y)^n$ are given by $\binom{n}{k} x^{n-k}y^k$, not by $\binom{n}{k} x^{n-y} y^k$
Ann:
and second, no, the terms in the expansion of $(x-y)^n$ are given by $(-1)^k \binom{n}{k} x^{n-k} y^k$. the expression you gave still gives the terms of $(x+y)^n$ just in reverse order
Ann:
hey guys
if a question is asking me to find how long the ball will stay in the air for
and they are giving me a quadratic equation
do I solve for roots or find the vertex
What’s the equation
h(t)= -4.9t^2+19.6t+2
I dont know time?
The time the ball is on the ground
oh
So if we can find both times the ball is on the ground
but like if I find the t intercept it gives me when it was lauched
oh
@prisma marten so if I find the t intercept i'll be the tottal time?
what does negative time mean @prisma marten
That would be before he throws it, which is nonsensical
alright thank you so much @prisma marten
No worries:)
GOD I regret taking this class online
All of the notes are in video form and I can't retain anything from videos, even if I write it down
?
Dr. Grimes and I flew aboard the NASA SOFIA mission in October 2016. We gathered
cosmic ray data on our way up. Here are a few data points:
Elevation Cosmic Ray Hits per Minute
33,164 ft 283
42,998 ft 549
We will pretend that at sea level the count is zero. That isn’t true, but we will use that for
this problem.
A] Use this data to determine the
rt y Pe^rt
equation where y is hits per minute, and t is
altitude.
B] If Baldwin’s cross-sectional area is 400 times that of the Geiger counter sensor, then what
would be his equation?
there
Namington:
yes
right, so y is hits per minute, t is altitude
yes
we have two data points
yes sir
(33164, 283) and (44998, 549)
if you were to substitute one of these data points in
$283 = Pe^{33164r}$
Namington:
you'll notice that we have two unknowns
oh, correction: we actually have 3 data points
"We will pretend that at sea level the count is zero. That isn’t true, but we will use that for
this problem."
so we also have (0,0)
yes
but yeah
anyway, we cant solve an equation with 2 unknowns... alone
but what we can do
is establish a system of equations
inputting another data point, we get $539 = Pe^{44998r}$
Namington:
ok
and our last point, $0 = Pe^0$
Namington:
buuuut thats a bit weird
so i'm gonna disregard it where possible
since it would suggest P = 0 is a valid solution.

wouldnt that be like p=0
yeah, which makes that solution extrenuous
ok so ignore that
so our system is:\
\
$283 = Pe^{33164r} \
539 = Pe^{44998r}$
Namington:
can you solve this?
sure.
can u keep going?
well, isolating each for P
$283 = Pe^{33164r} \ \implies P = \frac{283}{e^{33164r}}$
Namington:
$\frac{283}{e^{33164r}} = \frac{539}{e^{44998r}}$?
}}
Namington:
again, sure
technically we have to make sure the denominator will never equal 0, buuuut
e^x is never 0
for any real x
so in this case, that doesnt matter
$539e^{33164r} = 283e^{44998r}$
Namington:
the problem here is that
r is up in the exponent
do you know how to bring that down?
natural log?
yes, but do be careful
first divide?
what do i do with the 539 and 283
ln(ab)=ln(a)+ln(b)
im confused
Namington:
the trick is that
the exponents arent applied to the entire thing
so we cant just take them down or anything
what we can do
is break up these logs
note $\ln(ab) = \ln(a) + \ln(b)$
Namington:
soo, breaking up these logs
I know e is like 2.3
...a couple decimal places off, there, but either way, that's not really relevant here
I'm asking you to simplify $\ln(e^{33164r})$ and $\ln(e^{44998})$
Namington:
recall that ln means log with base e
i dont know what to do
do you know what ln is
no, this is circular and gets you exactly nowhere. when asked "what is the definition of log", you cannot just answer "it's a log"
isnt it like the function of a exponetitial graph
no
the natural log of a positive number x is the answer to the question "e raised to what power equals x?"
∂u/∂x = ∂v/∂y & ∂u/∂y = - ∂v/∂x:
∂u/∂x = ∂v/∂y & ∂u/∂y = - ∂v/∂x:
yes
excuse my latex I’m on a overcrowded train
nah ur good
i understood
what would ln(e^2) be then?
wouldnt it be 2
🤔
So if that’s right
What does ln(e^33164r) simplify to
okok
i get it
it cancels out
33164r
not quite
the ln(e^33164r)=33164
log(x^n)=nlog(x)
but this isnt log
i found r
then what do i do
But ln is log base e
i got it
thank you so much
what do i do for b
just multiply by 4 right
huh b?
If Baldwin’s cross-sectional area is 400 times that of the Geiger counter sensor, then what
would be his equation?
On our SOFIA flight we also took air pressure data. Here are a few data points:
Altitude Pressure
2,366 ft 27.448 inHg.
16,813 ft 15.606 inHg.
43,003 ft 4.782 inHg.
A] What is the pressure at sea level inHg based on this data?
B] Based on this data, at what elevation will the pressure be half that of sea level?
C] What will be the air pressure at 100,000 ft based on this data?
can some help with this
how do you find out if a piecewise function is injective/surjective
like this one for example
prob try to graph it and see if anything jumps out at you
On our SOFIA flight we also took air pressure data. Here are a few data points:
Altitude Pressure
2,366 ft 27.448 inHg.
16,813 ft 15.606 inHg.
43,003 ft 4.782 inHg.
A] What is the pressure at sea level inHg based on this data?
B] Based on this data, at what elevation will the pressure be half that of sea level?
C] What will be the air pressure at 100,000 ft based on this data?
can some help with this?
Do you have a calculator with statistics functions ? @viscid thistle
I believe so
@past glade that doesnt look like preuniversity to me
in fact that doesnt look like calc either
looks like precalc? like creating functions based off of data points
This is the precalculus chat
This is my teachers notes
What I dont understand is that when I put arctan(-1) in a calculator I get -pi/4. What he said is that -pi/4 is just a reference angle. I don't really get why it's a reference angle and not just an angle.
it is likely that the convention in your class is to take the argument of a complex number to be between 0 and 2pi
Yes forgot to say that
I think I dont understand what the argument is
you know how complex numbers can be thought of as vectors?
the argument of a complex number is the angle, measured counterclockwise, that the vector representing said number makes with the positive real axis
eh, i could see an advanced precalc class covering it
de moivre's isnt like
conceptually difficult or anything
once you get past the initial barrier of manipulating complex numbers, that is
I first encountered it in Lin Alg, but I also have no idea the US Curriculum, half these channels are weirdly named to me 
it is precalc
its the cis part I'm having trouble understanding
i did 2[cos(11pi/6)+isin(11pi/6)]
then 2^-10 or 1/2^10[cos(-55pi/3)+isin(-55pi/3)]
@prisma marten
yeah well you're almost done
do what
Anyone around to help with some simple precalc?

cos(a) =4/5 thats a
then cos(a+pi/6) thats c
cos(b+pi/6) = 4/5 thats b
then cos(b) = d
It’s the first answer right?
no
if you know that x=1 is a root you can do synthetic division
and then it is just a power of 2
which means you can use quadratic formula
to find the other 2 roots
yo please helpppp
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/509460208737845248/594342880232079380/helppp.PNG
I need to find cos(a+b) in terms of trigonometric functions of alpha and beta
im basically proving the angle addition identities
these are the side lengths I found
I already found sin(a+b) but I cant find cos(a+b)!!!!
yeah i just realized lmao
Are we able to simplify $\cos^2(x) + i\sin^2(x)$ using Euler's identity?
Daniel Cann:
nope
Hey guys Uni student here and starting a Pre-Calculus course tomorrow and I'm not very good at Math (though I do like the subject) was wondering if I could get some help?
with what?
so you want help with the things in your pre calc course
Yeah I do. If that's not a problem?
well like
do you have a problem you're stuck on or what
if you do, post it and someone will help you\
I don't have any today. My class starts tomorrow. If I have enough time though I will post it.
is cos(40)cos(80) different than cos(80)cos(40)
No, since it's just multiplication between two numbers
multiplication is commutative 
Order doesn't matter
it's written differently
help me find the standard equation of the parabola with focus (0,-3.5) directrix y=-3.5
where is the opening 😦
?
im confused
What do you mean where's the opening?
I need to turn this into polar (x^2+y^2-2x)=4(x^2+y^2)
x^2 + y^2
I’m not wrong, though?
The three vertices you get from this are (0,0), (0,6.5) and (1.733,0)
(0,6.5) leaves you with the greatest answer
Wait
I’m dumb
Just read it says minimum, ignore me
@kind pier
x² + y² = r²
x = rcosθ
And in case you ever need it,
y = rsinθ
But it's not useful here
i was wondering for 3d vectors, whats the fastest way to find the shortest distance from a point A(x1, y1, z1), from a line r = (x2, y2, z2) + k(x3, y3, z3)
Choose 2 points p and q on the line
Let b be a vector pq and let c be a vector pA
|b x c|/|b| is the distance
yep that works, thanks. i was thinking of using projection, but it is quite slow and probably only used when the vector is needed
is the domain: all real numbers?
well, is there any scenario where it would be undefined over the reals?
isnt odd root all real numbers and even will be need to set it >/= 0
Well, not always >= 0, since you might have it shifted, but uh yeah
it say in my book "odd roots are defined for both positive and negative values... so (neg infinity, positive infinity)"
If the codomain is $\mathbb R$ and that is the principle 3rd root, then the maximal domain is [1, inf).
EpicGuy4227:
but if it is the real 3rd root, the maximal domain is R
you guys, i’m desperate and exhausted. i have two assignments due in an hour that i thought were due tomorrow. i don’t know how to find the ordered pair of angles and the notes the teacher provides are vague, please help
if it's not one of those unit circle angles, you need to use sin/cos/tan etc. pythagorean rules
I don’t know rules, I don’t retain information from online classes, I just take them for the credit.
oof
i take precalc online too, but u should try to learn it
We're not here to feed you answers
Don’t do assignments last min if you know you need extra help
pain in the ass but each module is built on the last module
as for this rule
the pattern goes 1,2,3,4 and then 4,3,2,1 divided by 2
you should be able to memorize the ordered pairs that way
My life is too shit right now for my memory and my mental health is awful so learning has been hard for me as of late
May want to reduce your course load then
I don’t even know why I bother anymore
Honors and AP courses? Sure, they look good on an application, but I’ve never had dreams or wanted to be anything, so why take them?
God I’m in an awful state h
just finish up the courses u have then dont take them anymore
I'm signed up for college psyc and soc along with ap lang and ap us history next year
I do have a bit much but I don't have anything else to do with my time
You really should just get your life sorted out
ask to drop them before they start if you really think ur mental state is bad
Like sure your grades might suffer
But in the long run, it's a lot more important for you to be in a good place
and for ur time, find a hobby, figure yourself out
And your grades and your learning will be much better in the future because of it
I literally can't be in a good place with my situation. My family could care less for me, I live in a ghetto farm town with no one I can talk to or relate to.
I'm just me trapped in my room
Also, what would I do for a negative angle on the circle?
the ordered pairs work the same for negative angles
I'm assuming flip the quadrant since you'd be going backwards, yes?
yes, it's going counterclockwise
And, as an example, say you have an angle over 360 degrees, would it just fall into the same position of another angle +360
Like, say you have an angle of 400. Would that be in the place of 40?
Yes
Yes
they differ by 2pi, a full turn
Thanks guys, those assignments are done and I can rest easy.
Need help with the PreCal assignment.
What have you tried? Or what are you stuck on?
I just posted the screenshot.
I know
assume dollors per ONE hour for first mechanic is x and the same for second mechanic is y
Ax + By = 1000
x + y = 110
it’s quite simple to solve, i just plugged in two values and got the answer
Just plugged in the variables?
Well I just chose two simple, reasonable numbers that would add up to 110, plugged them into the 15x + 5y equation and it all worked out.
Is it 110 for both or the second one?
@gusty spade You've probably already solved this problem but I feel like I should point out that you don't need to "choose values" in this case
Solving for one of the variables (in this case y) and treating it like a system of equations is generally easier and works in most cases
what is giving you trouble here
i dont think it equals
what's making you think that this equality does not hold, then?
to me its like 2x3=6 but 2+3=5 so that shouldnt equal either
well ok the thing is, yes, IN GENERAL the product of two numbers isn't the same as their sum
but that doesn't mean that x+y NEVER equals xy
for example, 2 + 2 = 2 * 2
another example, 25/9 * 25/16 = 25/9 + 25/16
so it is entirely possible to have two well-picked numbers whose sum equals their product.
have you ever proved any trigonometric identities before?
@viscid thistle
i just got it, i saw what i was doing wrong
@grizzled orchid You've worked with Aleks?
recall the definition of a function
hey hey hey
so when given a quadratic function of f(x)=-490x^2 + 75x + 12
how do we find the x intercept
you cannot factor it
(as far as I can see)
and when you put it in the quadratic formula
it returns the wrong answer
the correct answer stated in the textbook is 0.3
Can you show your work please?
for factoring or quadratic formula?
quadratic formula
I may or may not have madea mistake when using the quadratic formula
Quadratic
so Im checking it once again
make sure to consider both the + and - solutions
is a = 490 or -490
-490
maybe it is my calculator?
here is what I plug in
perhaps I should do more in hand
Do more steps
Use calculator to do the multiplication sure, but make sure you write out your steps
also Learn Quadratic formula button on your calculator

ok lets see
nvm nvm
It seemed that the problem was
that I got the + value
but I did not switch it to -
I have it now with the work
so thank you guys
Ive now realized my mistakes
Terrorist scum
you should know the forms 1-2sin^2(b) and 2cos^2(b)-1
i solved for cos(b) but now im stuck
you should be trying to get CE
do i solve for tan(2b)
no
and use half angle formula
yah
np
ok, what's giving you trouble here?
On the instructions it says to identify the center and radius. however I'm having trouble doing that. Like starting the equation to get the answer basically.
you don't need to do anything to the equation. it is almost a matter of reading off the required details.
do you know what the general equation of a circle is?
No. Or at least I don't remember.
then you should go and consult your notes or your textbook.
Circle is a set of all point equidistant form a given distance .
I.e distance between these points is always a constant
Let's say h,k is the centr of the circle and r is the radius of circle
We wish to find all point (x,y) such that it is r units away from (h,k)
$\sqrt{(x-h)^2+(y-k)^2}=r$
Krishna 🙎:
$(x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2$
Krishna 🙎:
$(x+1)^2+(y+2)^2=2^2$ (h,k)=(-1,-2) and r=2 .
Krishna 🙎:
You need to plot the point -1,-2) on plane then take 2unit measure on the compas. and take (-1,-2) as centre and draw that circle
@gusty spade
It is, it seems to me
@next willow can you explain the 2nd line
where does a^(4/6) come from and for the denominator, why is a^(5/6) + a^(1/6) = a^(5/6)?
They didn't sum the denominators, let's say they manipulated the fractions so that they had the same denominator and then summed them (notice that a^(5/6)=(a^(1/6))^5=
=a^(1/6)(a^(1/6))^4 )
Or you can say that they collected 1/a^(5/6) from those two terms
x+y = 1/a^(5/6) (a^(5/6) x + a^(5/6) y )
The following steps weren't possibly necessary also, since twose two terms can be observed to be equal: a^(-1/6)/a^(5/6) + a^(-5/6)/a^(1/6) =
= 2* a^(-1/6)/a^(5/6)
what lol
i understood your first little sentence
but like i still dont get where that a^(4/6) came from
I'll write the steps in LaTex
ok thanks bro
It'll take me some time
ok np
$\frac{a^{-\frac{1}{6}}}{a^{\frac{5}{6}}} + \frac{a^{-\frac{5}{6}}}{a^{\frac{1}{6}}} = \frac{a^{-\frac{1}{6}}}{a^{\frac{5}{6}}} + \frac{a^{\frac{4}{6}}a^{-\frac{5}{6}}}{a^{\frac{4}{6}} a^{\frac{1}{6}}} =
\frac{a^{-\frac{1}{6}}}{a^{\frac{5}{6}}} + \frac{a^{\frac{4}{6}}a^{-\frac{5}{6}}}{a^{\frac{5}{6}}} =
\frac{a^{-\frac{1}{6}} + a^{\frac{4}{6}} a^{-\frac{5}{6}}}{a^{\frac{5}{6}}} $
Mat:
ohh
okay lol
how did you even figure that out
i wouldn't have if i had 1000 hours
just seems so hidden
As I tried to say before, this is just one of the many possible paths
If you get more comfortable summing fractions you'll see the paths quickly
The first fraction in the second lime seems off
can you help @earnest nymph
Change in to fraction first
The exponent
No
then?
I mean like sqrt (a) = a^(1/2)
which grade are you in
Don't change the negative exponent
oh youre in the US
So like just remain a^(-2/3)
and whys this in precalc lul
Yeah I think it's more suitable in #prealg-and-algebra @heady jewel
yes
Yes but like I say don't change negative exponent
@prisma prairie Something like this
so elite what was your question
i dont know how to get the answer
the answer is 2/a
but i get something else
no i still can’t
i need help still
im in college btww
ok ill be in that chat
I got this?
answer is 2/a
I know
OMG
you copied the question wrong
bruh
in the first term
denominator is a^5/6
lol
@prisma prairie
@earnest nymph
the solutions whih you gave above

