#precalculus
1 messages · Page 136 of 1
Ohh thanks

lol soap
apply the chain rule here
o no
you differentiated wrong
i fucked up didn’t i

ok i’ll try again sec
lemon catto:
k is constant
Cardioids look like butts
looks like x^3
x^3 doesn't go that quickly to -infinity
take out the 1/2 constant
divide by x
,$ \frac12 \lim_{x\to0} \frac{x²-x+\sin x}{x} \ \frac12 \lim_{x\to0} x-1+\frac{\sin x}{x}
yami:
^
hospital rule
L'Hopital
cause u have a 0/0 situation
lmao
do you guys have any good places to look up LH?
thank you very much guys : )
Best of Wisin & Yandel https://goo.gl/DRWu3S Subscribe for more https://goo.gl/KKFwMi Music video by Wisin & Yandel performing Pam Pam. (C) 2006 Machete Musi...
this comes up
lmaooo
set what equal to 0?
do you know what a log represents
it's essentially because you can raise a number to any other number and never get 0
yea
ahhh kk
it just gets closer and closer to 0
and u cant have a negative number in the log bc?
similar reason
you can raise a number to any other number youd never get a negative
You can have negative logs if you include complex numbers
But you cannot have log(0) even in the complex numbers
a bit stuck on how to find b and c, appreciate the help
has a vertex at (0,2) and passes through the point (1,4)
@obtuse ember I mean, just look at what stays before x^2 - thats a, same with x and the integer by x^0
@royal gull I got it solved under #help-6 already, mb for leaving the question here xD
k


Did I do this correctly? Question letter J
Yeap
You're flying from Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) to an undisclosed location 294 km south and 240 km east. Mt. Rainier is located approximately 56 km east and 40 km south of JBLM. If you are flying at a constant speed of 800 km/hr, how long after you depart JBLM will you be the closest to Mt. Rainier?
I don't understand how to do it at all. Please help.
no this is simpler; it's just calculus
draw a picture
model your plane's path
write an expression for your plane's position at time t
write an expression for the distance from your plane to Mt. Rainier at time t
differentiate and set = 0 to get the minimum
Help please
try drawing the parabola
@atomic urchin
^
what a god
anyone can help explain what the rref button does on the ti series
like ik how to apply it
i just dont know what it does
like it changes the matrix to 10 01 and answers on the end
just didnt attend class for the matrix lesson
So for the function of $f(x)=x^2-1$ we need to find what makes it continuous at x=2
Simply Me:
if x=2 its c
For a function to be continuous, ideally, most teachers say "start from end and go to the other end without lifting your pencil"
Although another way to put it is
Simply Me:
Both left and right bound limits must equal each other for the limit to exist, and if all the limits exist and they all equal what the function value equals, than the function is continuous
So.... ask yourself, what point would c be for the function $f(x)=x^2-1$ be continuous?
Simply Me:
umm
2 right?
4
3
f(2)=3
so need f(2)=lim x--->2 f(2)

can someone help me? im lost
@deep trail
What's the limit of f(x), as x → 2?
3
Yup lol
The definition of continuity gives you the answer. The hint is just restating the definition of continuity
Any time the word continuous is used, have that definition in your head
@simple hemlock use row operations
The standard elimination order is scaling the first row to have a 1 in the first column, eliminating the 2 in the second row, and then eliminating the 2 and -1 in the third row
I could really use some help guys. I have 8 questions. Willing to PayPal for help.
It’s on inverse functions.
What are the problems? I can try to see if I can give you some help, no money though.
@hollow plover looks right
How do you find the Y intercept of 14x − 6y = 54
Set x=0 and solve for y
Sooo It would be 9 ?
-6y=54
y=54/-6
y=-9
It's not too bad
I can see that sin is just getting shift up, but i don't know how explain it numerically
You guys into vectors?
vectors is a vague word
I guess it is, pure math approach, I started working on it last week so have not got much experience yet
What's the method to factor like this?
by grouping
Finding null points
Any trick to find the imaginary and complex part of $\sqrt{1+i\sqrt{3}}$?
Autistic Hoodie:
$x^3+x^2-4x-4=0 \ x^2(x+1) -4 (x+1) = 0 \ (x+1)(x^2-4) = 0 \ (x+1)(x-2)(x+2) = 0$
Autistic Hoodie:
@silk crow
Do you only keep one of the (x+1)'s from line 2 to 3? @slow wharf
Autistic Hoodie:
Like that
Ohhh. Thanks!
Np
@slow wharf set it equal to a+bi
square both sides
compare real and imaginary parts
Oh wow, haven't thought of that
$\sqrt{1+i\sqrt{3}} = x+iy \ 1+i\sqrt{3} = x^2 + 2xyi -y^2 \ 1+i\sqrt{3} = x^2-y^2 + i(2xy)$
Autistic Hoodie:
Autistic Hoodie:
How would I go about solving this system of equations?
It will have two answers, won't it?
Can you simplify -x^2-1x-1+x+1+1
I just need E
Anyone ?
education in the USA is not standardized; it varies from state to state and often locality to locality
"Find all maximum and minimum of f(x)=x^3-9x^2+24x using the First Derivative Test"
@distant flume what did you try?
people here are glad to help others, but not do their work
@viscid thistle Get the derivative and draw the single funcions of x^3,-9x^2 and 24x. Then see the right and left of the derivative in relation to the other functions i mentioned. This in two points when x=2 and x=4
I don't know from there onward
not sure what you said
but indeed x=2 and x=4 are involved
so guess you right
I think you should right things more properly
f'(x)=...
and as you said f'(x)=0 <=> x=2 or x=4
so you can factorize f'(x)
so you can study the variations of f'(x)
so you can see where it is increasing and where it is decreasing
the places where it changes variation (2 and 4) are local minimas and maximas.
to know which, refer to the variations
That's what I meant, yes
The problem is that I see no minimas nor maximas although there should be a minima
@distant flume did you draw the table of variations of f?
using the sign of f'(x)
also, as rockpaperscissors said, f has no global minimas or maximas (f goes to + infinity in + infinitiy and to -infinity in -infinity)
but it has local maximas and minimas
which you can spot looking at the table of variations of f
Yeah that's what I thought but I wasn't sure
I did do the table though
Thanks for the response @viscid thistle
cool! you welcome!
Autistic Hoodie:
Autistic Hoodie:
15=13+2

hang on
Can I do it like
$15 \cdot 3^k \cdot 5^{k+1} + 2 \cdot 2^{k+3} \ 14 \cdot 3^k \cdot 5^{k+1} + 3^k \cdot 5^{k+1} + 2^{k+3} + 2^{k+3}$
Autistic Hoodie:
I basically just want to get the $3^k \cdot 5^{k+1} \cdot 2^{k+3}$ part
Autistic Hoodie:
Please need help with Q5
I don’t get what they mean by passes fiftyth floor
Is it that we need initial velocity or acceleration before hand?
Or are they suggesting that the lift has a maximum height at the fiftieth floor and that after tht point the velocity is negative because the lift is going down?
Oh and is there a reason why they would give acceleration with variable time as a non given value
Could it be that the lift is falling down but accelerated upwards ?
The explanation is vague indeed
Yeah I’ve been staring at it for a while now
After 5 seconds the acceleration is positive
And when acceleration is positive then velocity is also positive
Like in a curve with two stationary points?
Think of a vertical toss, acceleration is negative but velocity positive
The question is when does the acceleration stop the negative velocity
So I have no where tht I know of to start this problem. I don’t even have a vague description of an equation...I just have points
Lets call t=0 the moment it passes the 50th floor
Should I just trial and error some stuff cause I have a wierd feeling tht they give acceleration with unknown time value suggesting tht tht initself is the equation of the acceleration.
Can you intgrate the acceletation to get the velocity?
Yeah yeah ofcourse
Okay, so whats the function for velocity
Anti dif the acc equation
Cause for some reason they put the acceleration equation as one single point on the y axis it’s freaking wierd
How do u mean that
Do you have the velocity vector now?
Um...about vectors yeah. I have not even touched vectors one bit
I will try learn after finishing integrals and then vectors and I’ll have the basics in precalc. Then I will attempt to learn other things on calculus
Kinda exciting tbh idk I think it’s just me
Haha math is exciting for sure
Mhmm
You know how to integrate?
Yeah haven’t touched it either. Sorry haha
I think it’s in the next chapter I will see
Are you sure you can solve this without calculus
Yeah anti diferentiation, and first derivative should be enough
O isn’t integral the area under the curve?
Well thats one of its applications
Talk in #math-discussion
But its calculated by taking the anti derivative
Give me 3 mins
im there
still here
Ughh I think imma continue try and trial error this problem tomorrow
It’s one am now and I have procrastinated math hw for other math hw
Anyways thnx for helping I have to sleep
the solution should be somewhere between the 26th and 27th floor
have fun
sleep well
Wait woah u know estimations
Ok anyways I’ll try again tomorrow
Hey is u solve the problem please post a picture here
its not an estimation i calculated it
im happy to explain it but im not just posting the soltuions
i found exactly 29th floor 
+the way the problem is written makes you think that the ans should be exact
Hi! I'm learning about conics right now, and I have a problem with ellipses.
$x^2/a^2+y^2/b^2$
perrot:
=1
Whoops
If a gets bigger than why does the ellipse get wider?
Shouldn't a denominator getting bigger make it smaller?
Like 1/2 going to 1/4
Let's see where the ellipse intersects with the x axis
it means y = 0
So $x^2/a^2 = 1$
Xaositect:
$x = \pm a$
Xaositect:
Yeah
Yeah
I got there on my own terms
And I was satisfied with it
But my precalc teacher told me that I should have used Pythagorean theorem
To find out the relationship between x and a
Thanks though!
I'm not sure what the teacher meant there
Yeah me either
In general, If you have something given by an equation f(x,y) = 0
and you want to scale it k times along the x axis
You get f(x/k, y) = 0
Because k units on the x axis in the new equation correspond to 1 unit in the old one
@spring thunder can u show me how u solved the problem?
Cause itll be nice if I could see where I did it wrongly
whatchu got?
interesting seeing your attempt tho
Attempt?
your work for the problem i mean
Oh um.....i don’t wanna humiliate myself cause I just wrote all over the page like an idiot
oke w/e
Kinda went back and forth and then did a lot of mistakes but couldn’t trace back
In the end somehow I got answer of 51 floors
Please don’t laugh
answer : the people are dead
Yeah lift rocketed out of the building
And apparently so did my rational thinking of problems at one am
So please please can u show me the right steps?
so $a=\frac19 (t-5)$ (assuming initial time is when the elevator passes the 50th floor)
emeric75:
so you haven't done integration yet right?
If integration is anti derivatives then yeah I have basic
yeah polynomials aren't too hard
So antiderivative acc, we get velocity function with a constant missing
Then what do we input to find it?
& you know the initial velocity
constants should come from known values given in the problem
Wait woah wats the initial velocity? -8?
yes
Ooh ok and the maximum height or position would be 300 metres in other words the fiftieth floor right?
or you can just say the origin for the position is the 50th floor (ie the initial position of the elevator)
or 50th floor : 300 w/e it also works
When the time is 0 the floor is 300 cause we start there ooooo ok
So if we do a graph fifty should be a y intercept
Ok I see
And then we use that point and find the height equation and we r done I guess
Wow thanks
well yeah try out the calculations at least 😄
in my calcs i assumed 50th floor = 0m, as long as you stay consistent you can choose whatever origin you want
Oh one more thing when they say when the lift stops on which floor...I’m confused
(just not something too wacky like 17th floor because why not)
"when the lift stops" when the velocity of the elevator = 0 is what they meant
What happens when lift stops....does it become another intercept of the height equation. Or is it when velocity equals zero?
Oh ok
but yeah the problem isn't well written indeed
Ok thank you so much again 
Ooo and guess what when velocity equals zero then it’s also a stationary point lol how have I been so blind

Can someone explain how the formula works?
It basically just says area = measurement/360 times the area so I'm confused how the area doesn't equal the area
Well the measure is by degrees, so m=180° means half the circle, which if you plug into the equation you get ½πr², which makes sense.
Would anyone be willing to help me with this? "AN airplane flies on a compass heading 90 degrees at 340 mph. The wind affecting the plane is blowing from 292 degrees at 31 mph. What is the true course and ground speed of the airplane?"
Looks good but how would you convert x,y to degrees @barren hedge
Hmm.
Inverse tan?
Sounds right.
Ill plug in the numbers and @ you for confirmation if thats alright
tan⁻¹(y⃗/x⃗)
wait whered you get the 22 from?
why not 292-90?
Why 360-292 and not 292-90? Because we're preserving that a circle is 360°
And we want the angle to be less than 90°, whereas whether it's +sin, +cos, or -sin, -cos, is depending on which quadrant the wind is blowing.
In this example, it's quadrant IV, so sin(292°) is (-), and cos(292°) is (+)
@spring thunder in regards to my question yesterday. I would like to know if velocity is possible when there is 0 time
I don’t understand the concept because when the question said the velocity is -8 I assume it is initial velocity and initial meant when X axis value or time in this case is 0
Cause I kinda did mistakes again
I don’t know why this problem is not making sense to me at all
It makes some sense but my answer is somehow far off
Here it is again so u don’t have to search for it
a=1/9(t-5)
§ 1/9(t)-5/9
V=t^2/18-5t/9+c
Now I will input velocity -8 when time 0
-8=c
Antidiverentiate V and we get the Height. Then we input the 300 metres (50th floor) and time 0 and we get the missing variable of the antiderivative.
Then I just equalise the V equation to 0 use quadratics and I get two points
Input one of them into the Height equation and we should get the answer no?
And despite doing these steps my answer still wrong
It's not the 4th floor?
Is $det(\frac{A}{3}) = \frac{det(A)}{3^2}$
Autistic Hoodie:
It depends: what is A?
I guess it works for 2×2 matrices
I've tested with other matrices too and it seems to work too
I couldn't find any theorem stating that it's valid though
other than 2x2 matrices?
Tested with 3x3 and it worked...
try it with the 3x3 identity matrix
the left side is the determinant of the matrix with 1/3 on the diagonals
which is 1/27
the right side is det(I)/9 which is 1/9
yes
I may have tested it on 2x2 actually
then yes it's always going to work in that case
one of the "rules" for determinants is that if you multiply a column by a number, then the determinant gets multiplied by that number
so when you multiply a column by 1/3, the det gets multiplied by 1/3
so if you multiply the whole matrix by 1/3, then that's multiplying each column by 1/3
and so in an nxn matrix there are n columns so that changes the determinant by 1/3^n
@fossil sedge just show your thing yes I was in class
How would I find the tangent line? I don’t know the formula for it, I think it’s y-y1=m(x-x1) but not sure on how to find m
This is precalc, but you know derivatives?
If you know derivatives, take the derivative of the function and plug in the given x value (1).
Sorry it just seemed like the people helping in precal were more helpful than calculus. I plugged in 1 and got 4
okay, so f'(1) is the slope at x=1
So would I use that formula y-y1=m(x-x1) and plug 1 into x1?
ya, plug f'(1) in for m, plug 1 into x1, and f(1) into y1
because derivative is slope, 1 is your xposition, and f(1) is the y value at that xposition
Damn man thank you so much! I appreciate that a lot!
np
@spring thunder um....I kinda did 9 times 2 =81
Oops
I got the answer nw
300-126=174 174/6. =29th floor
I know vectors (a,6) and (2,a), and now I need to find what a must be so the two vectors point to the same direction. The answer I must get is +/- 2 sqrt 3.
What is the right method to figure out what a must be?
did you read what i typed in #prealg-and-algebra ?
I did
thats the method for it ig
Do you mean I should rewrite them?
oh yes
well there u go
that I did not come up with tha
How do I solve a limit such as $lim_{x\to2} e^{\frac{1}{x^2-5x+6}}$
Autistic Hoodie:
Without the use of a calculator
Like
Why is the derivative from the right 0??
I understand that the derivative of the right will have
$e^{-\infty}$
Autistic Hoodie:
Autistic Hoodie:
But shouldn't that be equal to one?
What are you even trying to do? Calculating the limit from the original post or a derivative that you didn't mention in the original post?
Solving the limit
Does it even exist though?
Prove it
xd
$\lim_{x\rightarrow 2}\qquad\lim_{x\rightarrow 2^-}\qquad\lim_{x\rightarrow 2^+}$
Tuong:
sometimes, these do not exist simultaneously
That's correct
If the function is not continious at the point the left and right limit may be different which means that the limit and that point does not exist
$\lim_{x\to2^+}e^{\frac{1}{x^2-5x+6}} \ e^{\frac{1}{0^-}} \ e^{-\infty} \ e^{\frac{1}{\infty}} \ e^{0} \ 1$
Autistic Hoodie:
Is it not?
Tuong:
Well yeah...
you wrote that yourself
Yeah but that meant I wanted to find both derivatives
Limits from the left and from the right
Limits**
Sorry
I understand that the limit from the left is +infinity but I don't understand why the right limit is 0 and not 1
"exp(-∞)" isn't the same as "exp(1/∞)"
Well first, there's no such thing as "to the power of minus infinity"
Then
$\lim_{x\rightarrow - \infty}e^x=0$
Tuong:
Hi there folks! I've got a quick question regarding standard form eq for circles. If I had a center at (2, -1) and the line passes through (4, 3) and I wanted to get an equation in standard form I could use the distance formula on those two points to find the radius correct? And after I have the radius I can fill out standard form.
In other words I need to fill out (x-h)^2+(y-k)^2 = r^2. I have the two points I mentioned earlier. So to find r I can just use the distance formula. Correct?
Given log100 = 2 and log3 = 0.4771, what is log300?
Log(300) = log(100×3) = log(100) + log(3)
Wouldn't that be 2.4771?
^^
Kaynex actually helped out by explaining why though 
Can someone find derivative of f(x)=(x+2)^2 * (x-b) for b is a rational number
And do we use the quotient rule for this or is there a way to find derivative of it using just the chain rule?
Hint : assume (x+2)^2 a new function g(x) and apply quotient rule and to differentiate g(x) , apply chain rule.
Just use quotient rule where g(x) = 1/(x-b) tbh
quotient rule
Hi which is the best way to start learning precalculus?
I am going to start it
By myself
So any advice?
$y+cos(\frac{x}{y})^2=\frac{9}{2}$
Autistic Hoodie:
The derivative would be like
$y' + 2cos\frac{x}{y}(-sin\frac{x}{y}) \frac{-xy'}{y^2} = 0$
Autistic Hoodie:
$(\frac{x}{y})' = \frac{x'y-xy'}{y^2}$
Autistic Hoodie:
hah
that's interesting
the quotient rule doesn't work here
woops
sorry
i made a mistake

The three stooges (Larry, Curly and Moe) are trying to move a piano. Larry applies a force of
700 N [S 60° W], Moe applies a force of 900 N [N 30° E], and Curly
applies a force of 1000 N [S 45° E].
a) Draw a position diagram for the piano.
b) Draw a vector diagram for the piano.
c) Calculate the resultant force, and express it as a magnitude and direction.
d) Calculate the equilibrant force.
Just resolute the force vectors ?
draw the diagrams and add the vectors
you should know how to do both; if you don't, then you shouldn't even be starting on the problem
these are basic skills in physics that they should have taught you before assigning this problem; there's nothing particular to the problem that's tricky at all or that you should need help figuring out
Have you tried anything with regards to the problem?
Is it appropriate to call the asymptotes of a hyperbola, oblique asymptotes?
I forgot what oblique means
t!wiki oblique
📖 | ** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oblique **
Oblique may refer to:
an alternative name for the character usually called a slash (punctuation) ( / )
Oblique angle, in geometry
Oblique triangle, in geometry
Oblique leaf base, a characteristic shape of the base of a leaf
Oblique angle, a synonym for Dutch angle, a cinema...
because that is the function on which it lies
So I got this worksheet with formulas on it, but it doesn't tell me what the numbers stand for. It says it's the "time value of money" formulas, and it has M, r, n, and t. I assume M = monthly payment, r = rate, n = number of times compounded, and t = time passed, but I'm not sure. Is that right?
@small basin
Still need it?
yeah
when i plug it in, it gives me an overflow error if i use 12
but when I use 1 it makes more sense and is reasonable
isnt it annual so the n is always 1
Oh. t = number of periods
n = number of compounds per period
oh
r = rate per period
thank u
I may not be reading into this correctly
but for #10
I believe taking exp of both sides gives you y = exp(2 + 4 * ln(x))
@viscid thistle
actually never mind, there's something even better
4 * ln(x) = ln(x ^ 4)
and ln(x ^ 4) + 2 = ln(x ^ 4 * exp(2))
so y = e ^ 2 * x ^ 4
or even better
exp(2 + 4 * ln(x)) using laws of exponents
is y = e ^ 2 + x ^ 4
so yeah multiple attacks
I have to go now, but I will be back soon if you have questions, or maybe someone else will attend
What is exp? @limber onyx
@viscid thistle abbreviation for e ^ x
Exp is longer tho... 10/10 abbreviation
lol
I need help with these two inequality questions
Whoops wrong chat sorry
Hey @viscid thistle are you still there?
I don't mind helping
Yeah still here
Cool so you need help with 41)?
And the question above it
Okay well we'll start with 41 then. Does that say +18 or -118?
+18
okay
So do you know how to factorise?
Yeah
So you need to factorise the left hand side
(x-6)(x+3)<0 I'll have to use < as I have no clue how to do less than or equal to.
Wait no that's wrong
Ohh I thought I would have to use (b/2)^2
Sorry man I gotta be drunk or something
You need to use the formula
Not that’s right
Oh wait
Nvm
-6*+3 is definitely not +18. That's why I originally asked about your hand writing. Then I just got side tracked and I wrote down - on my piece of paper anyways
Do you know the quadratic formula?
like the -b +/- sqrt(b^2 -4ac) and so on
Yeah but i don’t think that will help tho
Oh no it will
The b^2 -4ac part is negative
Which you can't do.
why not just factorise it then sketch?
So you say it has no real solutions.
Like at no point is that quadratic below or equal to 0
-6 and 3 doesn’t equal to 18 @serene heath
oh its +18 nvm
Yeh @serene heath I made the exact same mistake AFTER asking him to clarify the handwriting.
Sorry @viscid thistle I gotta go. But for the other one x>0 and x>-7/2 sketch it and make sure you have the inequality the correct way!
Tyty
Wait... What if x<0 and x<-7/2 ? That is a solution for 40), right ?
Yes, it's for 39, not 40, my bad.
It’s good
Anyways I’m so stuck on 41. I might just check my notes about it. If I don’t find the solution I’ll hit you guys up
@viscid thistle I told you the answer to 41. It doesn't have any real solutions as the discriminant is below 0
Alright
If x^2 is transformed and translated by a vector (2 3)
then does it become (x-2)^2 +3 ?
yeah
Find the zeros of the function algebraically.
f(x) = 2x2 − 7x − 72
Anyone able to help ? ik to change F(x) to 0 and thats it...
the 2x2 is soupose to be a exponet of 2..
Can you factor that?
I dont think so now that IM looking at it, its soupose to be 2x^2-7x-72=0
Yes, that gives the zeroes. But, one way to find them is by factoring
Yea.. Im confused.
Hmm. I'm having trouble factoring it. Maybe it can't be? Know the quadratic formula?
No, it is factorable
every polynomial can be factored
Sun is down
Freezing cold
Thats how we already know winter's here
My dog prolly do it for a Louis belt
Thats just all he know
He dont know nothin else
I try to show em
uch
So i can simplify
by (x+2)(x²-3)
and next? 😄
so x1 = -2 and x2 is +- root of 3 ?
those are all the sols ye
wym?
what is wym?
you can factor an x out
x(x²+10x16)=0
now you can try factoring that quadratic inside
ur right xD
Hey guys, could anybody explain to me how the simplification works between these two steps?
$$\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}\sin(x) - \sqrt{x}\cos(x) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}\sin(x) - \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}\sqrt{x}\times 2\sqrt{x} \times\cos(x) $$
emeric75:
@spring thunder Wow! ok, thanks I got it
But I would never had figured that out on my own
How does one get that intuitive feel in mathematics?
steroids
but yeah seeing that 2sqrt(x) going to the den makes you think that there was some factoring in the numerator going on
and apart from drugs, the boring answer is just practice (a lot) and git gud
and if your head is a tad slow, just ask your mates (or the discord) or try on your own until your brain melts
@cinder ocean
@spring thunder hahah okay, thanks. Yeah, I'll be asking here a lot 😃
Would f^2(x) be the same as f(x)^2?
depends on the author i guess
sometimes f^2(x) is used to denote function composition, i.e. f(f(x))
Oh thanks
Ye, the only exception seems to be with trigonometric functions where people write sin²(x) all the time when they mean (sin(x))²
(and only spawns of the devil ever encounter problems where something like sin(sin(x)) is relevant)
f²(x) is an odd notation.. I know that f⁽¹⁾(x) means the first derivitive of f(x), A.K.A. f'(x).
ehhh it's a meh notation ive only ever seen it used in like weird taylor series thingys
I've asked my analysis professor about that...
$$f^2(x)=f(f(x))$$ $$f^{(2)}(x)=f''(x)$$ $$f(x)^2=(f(x))^2$$
TSM64CM:
Except in one case... $cos^2(x)=(cos(x))^2$
TSM64CM:
ewwwwwww
this is all so 🤢
like this is all fine if u have like a sentence before it saying
that this is how the notation will be used in the next few pages or watever
but
echhhh
What if it just askes how to transform f(x) into f^2(x)
Just apply the function a second time, I guess ?
what would transform in this case even mean
ok a mood
The first and third one are the most confusing ones.
I'll just write something on the graph, it's just completion grade + I'll also ask my teacher
n1*sin(i) = n2*sin(r)
(n1/n2)*sin(i) = sin(r)
I don't understand how the top
became the bottom
for snells law
wouldnt everything on the left side be divided by n2?
From what I understand,
$n_1 sin(i)=n_2 sin(r)$ divide both sides by n_2 $\frac{n_1}{n_2}sin(i)=sin(r)$
uh
that did not really answer my question though
why is sin not being divided by n2
sin(i) is not being divided by n2
$\frac{n_1sin(i)}{n_2}=\frac{n_1}{n_2}sin(i)$
MathLyfe:
There we go.
Oh you mean some sort of proof? Usually it's just how it is, lol.
sin(i) in snells law is not being divided by 2
it's the associative property of numbers
if you want proof you're gonna have to prove the associative property of numbers
Okay thank you for giving a name for it, lol.
Commutative is like AB=BA
yeah i guess associative and commutative?
the fraction on the left is (n1 * sini) ÷ n2 the fraction on the right is (n1 ÷ n2) * sini
(technically that's just associative lol)
yeah thats what I assume is suppose to happen
but like
what happens to the sin(i)/n2
why does it just disappear
You factor it out, for lack of better words.
Nope.
(n1 * sini) ÷ n2 = (n1 ÷ n2) * sini = n1 * (sini ÷ n2)
But he's asking why, hmm.
Recall that when multiplying fractions, you multiply the top with the top, and the bottom with the bottom,
yeah
$\frac{n_1sin(i)}{n_2}≠\frac{n_1}{n_2}\frac{sin(i)}{n_2}=\frac{n_1sin(i)}{n_2^{2}}$
MathLyfe:
Hopefully that makes sense.
MathLyfe:
That is what it means to factor out something, in this case since the 1/B is infront, you can say I factored out a 1/B from A/B
but the top for n1 isnt 1?
Even though the A is no longer in the "fraction" it's still there because of the associative property.
It's a general case example.
$\frac{n_1sin(i)}{n_2}=\frac{1}{n_2}n_1sin(i)$
MathLyfe:
^ Would be your case.
But to get n1/n2, you would multiply the two fractions (1/n2 & n1/1).
Well there's not mathematical proof for that lol. It's just based on mathematician preference.
Computer Science?
yep
doing things different ways
come out as different answers
could be off by the 15th decimal point
Would I just find the vertical component for this problem? A projectile is fired with an initial velocity of 550 feet per second at an angle of 70 degree with the horizontal. In how
many seconds will the projectile strike the ground?
I understand how to do it by giving us (x,y) I dont understand how to do it by them just giving us x intercept
so would I do y-0=4(x-8)?
yup
what about the second one
horizontal lines have equations y=a
where a is a constant
and vertical lines have equations x=a
so it will be y=3/11 and y=-5/7?
no those are both horizontal lines
I dont understand
so it will be x=-5/7?
it would be the y=3/11
@serene heath can you help with Modeling with Liner Functions word problems?
ok
For slope, first one is growth per year, second one is cost per bike
For y int, first one is initially population, second one is overhead costs
<@&286206848099549185> Hello. Does the sign always change for the x-interval with this formula on the graphs?
Yes
And if it was a negative, would it change to postive?
Yes
can i simplify this
4/(2-t)^2 = 2/(2-t)
Multiply both sides by (2 - t)²
so i can’t square root the top and bottom??
Wat
it’s the f’(t) of f(t)
can i simply a rational function by square rooting the top and bottom tho
No, since taking the square root of something will change its value
Much like x doesn't simplify to x + 2
oh so it’s not allowed?? i thought i saw it done sometimes tho
It is true that the square root of 4/(2 - t)² is 2/(2 - t)
But it is not true that 4/(2 - t)² = 2/(2 - t)
ohh
Oh, also note the potential ±
Yes that doesn't simplify any nicer
thankss
@patent beacon
Would you happen to know how to do it, nobody's really said anything for the past 20 minutes
Does anyone have a method for finding zero's of a polynomial that is faster than the rational zeros theorem?
@open apex
Hey, still looking?
I don't really know how to approach it, that's the main issue
Identity matrix is the way I approached it
Hmm?
Uhhh
If I had a pencil and
Give me a minute
Then you'd do
1/3! and the matrix
Infinitely
Yes, that's the definition of e^M
And that, exactly, is the problem. How do we find an easy way to express it?
If you're trying to ask me, I have no clue
I looked at the problem for a fat 30 minutes and tried to do a bunch of things with it
We need an easy way to find the entries of Mⁿ
Cayley-Hamilton comes to mind if you know that one
As I said
Most of the math I do is intuitive
But uhhh
There's a pattern, I'm just being retarded to what it is
I'm pretty sure you're just supposed to find the pattern that's taking place and then you go off from there, but I'm kinda clueless
There you go, now you're thinking.
Indeed, knowing that pattern would help
Top left is pretty clear, that's just 2ⁿ
Top right isn't so clear though
Actually, 2ⁿ - 1 makes sense yeah
That's Mⁿ you found


