#precalculus
1 messages · Page 134 of 1
no I can;t
?
what
=pup factorise (3x^4-4x^3+1)
never say never
you get the remaining factor generally by long division
I understand now
or any division method
sometimes, there are nice shortcuts
but i don't see any here
.
what shd I do next
the answer is a o with a slash
@serene heath @clever inlet
ø
limit does not exist
?
Can you explain a bit
yep
meaning you can do more work to possibly reach some answer
yes
oh
so once I have found out theres nothing I can do, so the limit doesn't exist
right?
kind of i guess
yea it doesnt
you start to learn cases where limit dne
my teacher just gave us this ws
=pup plot (x+2)/(x-1)
and he just showed us how to do the factorization wihtout even telling us about the indeterminate form lol
yea
but
top and bottom have a factor of -1
oh
so you can factor out (x+1)
k lemme try
oh it's somehow related to the use of remainder theorem right? @serene heath
t!yt polynomial long division
This math video tutorial provides a basic introduction into polynomial long division. it explains how to find the quotient with the remainder given the divid...
this should help
im fixin it
Bot does it 4 u
oh
Ye, ye
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages
Alright
well i need help figuring out part B
idk what the H is there for
guess ill move it to one of the channels down below
I guess once you've simplified the arc between x=2 and x=2+h
You can sub h=1
To get the ARC between x=2 and x=3
but how do i simplify the arc between those two if i dont know what h is
=pup graph 2x^2-x
The way you simplified the ARC between x=-1 and x=0
Once you get an expression that gives the ARC between x=h and x=h+1 in terms of h of course u sub h=1
x=2 and x=2+h * sorry
so h is just 1
Yeah becaue of h=1 we get the ARC between x=2 and x=2+1
Which is the arc between x=2 and x=3
Which is what we want
theyre just practicing their camera angles dont mind them
^^^^
what are the key differences between a hyperbola and ellipse
Both are very similar ellipse has a +, hyperbola has a -
is there a way to find the equation of a half of a curve like in a supply and demand graph so you can estimate the future if the trend continues?
id assume that he means something like arc length
say you have a curve in the domain 0 < x < 2
take half of that
.. or something like that XD

Sounds like differentiability and Taylor series
how do i solve sin(B)=10(4)/sin(36deg.) ?
The given were A=36deg., a=10, and b=4
Law of Sine, to solve the triangle
any help would be nice
oh nvvm, i knew i had to do the inverse sine to both sides
for some reason, i cant do thr inverse sin in the calculator
its in degree mode
why not
that would be because the domain of sin^-1(x) is -1≤x≤1
nvm, i got it
Very small question regarding transformation of quadratics
Would a horizontal shrink by a factor of 2/3rds be (1 ⅔X)^2?
For number 6) a) and b) my teacher graphed them like this. I don’t know how she did it. Can someone pls help explain?
And also I don’t know how to solve a quadratic inequality from looking at a graph. Can someone help explain?
do you have trouble with graphing quadratics in general
or just the regions for inequalities?
well it's either inside or outside
vegangod
what a terrible name
anyways
its too easy
if y is more
like y >3x+4
then u shade up
if y is less
y <3x+4
u shade down
=pup grpah y > 3x +4
= pup graph y < 3x +4
The bot is already processing a Wolfram|Alpha query for this server.
Try again in a moment.
@limber bone
more
above the line
u shade above the line
same with anything
imagine quadratics like two lines
if y > more
then shade above them
smae with absolute functions
and so on
got it?
For quadratics though I know how to do linear just not quadratic
^
when in doubt though, just test a point
ye
but thats like
when ur really worried
like htink of it
if i want the values more than y
and i have y grpahed
then i shade higher thany XD
than y*
right?
=pup graph y > x^2
=pup grpah y < x^2
The bot is already processing a Wolfram|Alpha query for this server.
Try again in a moment.
@limber bone
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/363224154469826562/537936803554918410/result.png this is the graph of y > x^2
see how he shades above the lines
of the quadratics * assume they are lienes *
lines*
got it?
No sorry
its ok
y > x^2 for example
to graph inequalities
all they differ from than normal equations
is that just the shading
and there are only two places where u can shade
above or below
how do u know? from the sign ofd the inequality
if y > then shade up
if y < then shade down
thats it
and note something small
if y > then do dotted lines at the end
if y>= then graph it normally and just do the shades
got it ?
y>x^2, why isn’t it at (0,0) for the origin of the parabola ??
Oooooo okay I understand the shading now
Also for this question: how do you find the inequality equation
??
The check mark is my teachers answer, I don’t know how she got it
well once you got the equation for the quadratic itself
you apply the same idea from above with the above or below
and the curve is dotted
which is used to represent strictly less than, or strictly greater than
strictly less than in this case
I don’t understand what’s your talking about 
he means
its the same thing as like wrinting an equation of a normal parabola
just differ the inequality sign
and if its weak or strong
here its dotted
and below the parabola
so y less
y <
go tit?
got it*
was there working before this?
I understand that
cause she seemed to jump a bit ahead
you would generally need to find the leading coefficient
using a third point
usually the vertex
No she’s a bad teacher she just writes the answers and sits in for the rest of the time
here
If u ask her question she gets mad
tell her u love her
The y intercept maybe help?
-12
ah yeah

that point would be useful in finding the leading coefficient
your teacher wrote 2 for it
which i assume is correct
but with like no working out
y = a(x-3)(x+2)
plug in (0, -12)
solve for a
that's generally how you would do it
The drawing isn’t on zero so I got confused idk my friend said just say it’s zero cuz she drew the graphs up
what do you mean?
Why y=a(x-3)(x+2) where’s does this equation come from
It's the more general roots forn
so u have problems with graphing tghe function as itself
not the inequalities
right vegan
?
Your two roots aren't enough to determine a unique equation for a quadratic
The vertex isn’t exactly on 0,-12 so I was confused with that 
^ ye but in most cases they are
but like
sometimes the parabola
is ab it stretched
from this a factort
so u need another poiunt
which kangaroux said
the y intercept
You can use any third point
That's kind of specific to linear functions

That's the general roots form for a quadratic
Is a the slope?
Ehh
In a sense, it affects steepness
This is the type of situation where playing on Desmos helps
Sorry I don’t understand what this equation means the y=a(x-3)(x+2)
And why did the signs become opposite for 3 and -2 when you put it in
I just don’t understand what the equation means
Well, what happens when you plug in x = 3
y becomes 0 right?
This is what we want
essentially now narrow or wide it is
the cool thing is, no matter what a is in that form
it will always pass through the given roots
Ok thanks guys I understand now
hello
i have a question its very simple
but my brain isnt working atm so i need help
make (A/t )the subject of A=-A_0 *e^ -(lamda *t) where lamda = ln2/t_(1/2)
so this
make A/t the subject ^
When finding the domain and range of an inverse function we swap the domain and range of the parent function right? So the domain of tan is (-pi/2, pi/2) and the range is +/- infinity. This would mean the domain of arctan is +/- infinity and the range is (-pi/2, pi/2). Is that correct?
<@&286206848099549185>
The domain of tan is restricted to (-pi/2, pi/2) or the domain of arctan is restricted?
@serene heath
Cause my understanding is that the domain of of arctan doesn't need to be restricted since it isn't periodic right? Wait is arctan a periodic function or no since we only map it from the restricted version of tan?
sorry the range is restricted so that the function isnt many to one
not the domain, domain is all real
Ahh that makes more sense. So can arctan be periodic? Is arctan able to be defined for other domains of tan? Like would we ever graph arctan from the tan of (-pi/2 + 2pi, pi/2 + 2pi)
What would it look like if we graphed arctan without the range restricted?
no arctan is the inverse function of tan defined so its not many to one
if you change the defined range then its not arctan anymore
if you graphed the inverse of tan it'll just look like the tan graph but reflected across the line y=x
@viscid thistle
"sorry the range is restricted so that the function isnt many to one" Thinking about this is a little confusing to me. I mean, I've never heard of range being restricted, except indicentally by restrictions to the domain. Does that make sense? Are you saying that the range of arctan is restricted by the restriction to the domain of tan?
@serene heath
sorry im explaining this horribly
here this site explains it well
and sorry for the delays im watchin a footbal game lol
@viscid thistle
anyone have the ebook of this pre cal book? Author: Stewart
Edition: 7th
ISBN: 9781305701618
Copyright Year: 2016
Publisher: Cengage Learning
I have actual books not books that you read online
@fickle moat should be all real numbers (-infinity, infinity) i believe
bc the domain goes from everything below zero to everythinf above and including zero
range should be same thing
bc it's a linear function
(were it a quadratic or something you'd have a min/max value or vertex for the range, even with a domain of all real numbers)
what about everything between 2 and 8 for the range ? 
and that thing is 3 days old w/e
@kind pier I highly recommend by AoPS' Precalculus book. A link to this is here: https://artofproblemsolving.com/store/item/precalculus
A comprehensive textbook covering precalculus topics. Specific topics covered include trigonometry, complex numbers, vectors, and matrices. Includes many problems from the AIME and USAMO competitions.
It is very comprehensive and even if you took the class, you will still benefit
Alright, so on the unit circle, can someone tell me the pattern for radians? I identified the pattern for the degrees (like for example, the 1st and 4th quadrant, if you imagine the triangle that's 30 degrees upside down, it hits 330 degrees, and 330 + 30 = 360. This applies for quadrant 1 and 4, and quadrant 2 and 3.) and I know it with the coordinates (like Q1 would have (1/2, √3/2), and Q2 would have (-1/2, √3/2)), but what is the pattern for radians?
I'm not sure what you're asking here, but the pattern doesn't really change
It's just that the circle is expressed in terms of radians instead of degrees, so if we'd take your original 330 + 30 = 360 that'd be 11/6pi + 1/6pi = 2pi instead
Oh wait
I was trying to identify the pattern
of guessing what the radiant would be
but that helped me recognize it
thank you uwu
no problem uwu
My class just started polar graphing
How the fuck do you actually do that
I'm so confused
graph the poles
dw you're not a dummy dad
How do find out if the graph is symmetrical to x axis y axis and or origin?
i know how to do it with equations but not graphs
If you flip the graph over the x-axis and it's the same, then it's symmetric about the x-axis
Similar idea with y
,ask graph cos(x)
You can see from the higher graph that cos is even
The left is a mirror of the right
ok so basically if you want to find out if lets say a point on the graph is symmetrical to the y-axis, you have to take the x coordinate in (x,Y) and negate it?
sorry i just started my precalc class and we didnt really go into cos and stuff yet
although we learned that in geometry but i forgot most of that
this is from our first class
pls i beg
😦
Actually I derped. No function is symmetric about y because then it's not a function
so the graph is not symmetric to the x axis y axis or the origin?
Well, there is ONE.
my teacher says its symmetric to the y axis
No function is symmetric about y? 
np
A function is even if the y-axis acts as a mirror for the function
We say it's symmetric about the y-axis
You can see cos(x) is even.
I'm not sure if your graph may be poorly drawn, but it doesn't look even. Almost though
Does anyone have any understanding on how to do this please? I need help, it’s confusing me :/
Polynomials are continuous everywhere, so no need to check anywhere but x = 1
A function is continuous at a point if:
-The limit exists there
-The function is equal to the limit at that point
So how would I check x=1 to see if it's continuous?
Thats the issue, I don't even know to test the limit... I am so bad at bath
math*
I mean I would assume if the left = the right, then the limit exists, right?
I would say no? Because 1^3+6= 7 and 7 ≤ 1 does not make sense.
why 7 =< 1?
i mean, what does it have to do with our thing?
but yeah 7 is the left limit at x=1
and the lim to the right is ... ?
rip
can someone help with this question? its a logarithmic question based on exponential growth and decay
Dry cleaners use a cleaning fluid that is purified by evaporation and condensation after each cleaning cycle. Every time the fluid is purified, 2.1% of it is lost. The fluid has to be topped up when half of the original fluid remains. After how many cycles will the fluid need to be topped up?
Im not great with expo growth and decay in terms of finding an equation from it
ok so you know you need to reach 50% of the original value
yea
and you also know that your decay is 2.1% / purification
yea
yami:
x_t is your 50%
x_0 is the original amount of fluid you had
t is your time
what is r?
wouldnt it be 2.1% or 0.21?
theres no time dependencay tho
yea i know that
then because its a decay you have to subtract that value
so you end up with
,$ 0.5 = x_0(1-0.021)^t
yami:
so x_0 would be 1? because of how much I initially started with

i guess yeah 
wat is haeppning
if 2.1% is lost each time then youre left with 97.9% yes?
if A is how much you had initially
then after i use youd have A*0.979
after 2 uses A*0.979^2
so on...
so in general after n uses
im lost tbh
this is complicated...
yes
after you use it once yoy lose 2.1% of it
which means youre left with 97.9%
agree
?
so 1-2.1%?
or 97.9%
nvm i got that
yea
then
so after one use youre left with 97.9% of what u had originally
if originally you had A amount of fluid
then after one use youre left with 97.9% of A
or A*0.979
when you say "A" you mean A=100 right?

yea
kk
so would the formula be y= A(2.1)^t ?
t usually stands for time but it can be anything really
in this case the formula is A*(0.979)^n
where n is the number of uses
that formula tells you much fluid you have left after n uses
yea I can solve it from here
nice
all i needed was to understand how to find the formula for it
I am having problems with this problem
It is simple but I keep getting it incorrect
The sum of two natural numbers is 20
Find the numbers so that the product of the square first and cube second is maximum
And I am stupid
I keep writing product as + goddamnit
Okay, so
Let's just say x+y = k for simplicity
x, y and k being natural numbers
Note that x = y-k
Thus $ x^2 + y^3 = (y-k)^2 + y^3 $
Nuke:
Autistic Hoodie:
OH
$y=a^2b^3 \ y'=?$
Autistic Hoodie:
Autistic Hoodie:
The result of that is 20 and 12
Wait, no
But when I use the $x_{12} = \frac{-b=-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$
Autistic Hoodie:
I get it incorrectly
You get $ a^2(20-a)^3 $
Nuke:
Differentiate w.r.t a
Autistic Hoodie:
Or should work too
$(400-40b+b^2)b^3$
Autistic Hoodie:
Autistic Hoodie:
I mean, you're not supposed to use wolfram
But when I use the formula
Hold on a sec tho
$x_{12} = \frac{32+-\sqrt{(-32)^2-41240}}{2}$
Autistic Hoodie:
It gives incorrect answers
Let $ f(b) = b^3(20-b)^2 $, thus $ f'(b) = 3b^2(20-b)^2 - b^3(20-b) $
Nuke:
I mean
The answer are the roots of f'(b)
In fact there can only be
Yeah I'm not sure how many roots it has, tbh
But if you are allowed to use wolfram then you just need to get those roots
Because honestly I have no idea where that polynomial of yours came from
Ah
It's not wrong tho
The determinant is equal to 64
Thus x = 16 +- 4
Which is 20 and 12
Damnit

I calculated 4*240 as 980
I think I need to go to slepe
I am too much deconcentrated
:/
Yeah sure
$y=(20-b)^2b^3 \ y = (400-40b+b^2)b^3 \ y = 400b^3-40b^4+b^5 \ y' = 1200b^2 - 160b^3 + 5b^4 \ y' = 5b^2(240-32b+b^2)$
Autistic Hoodie:
Oh, that's true
Dunno if there was a simpler way
I'd have needed to put this on paper to realize it
No no yours is perfectly fine
Well done!
Oh man I'm so sorry to hear that :(
But hey you seem to be doing pretty fine now
If math was what pulled you down then if you keep practicing it'll stop being a bother in no time
Can someone visually explain what we are getting when we are finding the gradient at a point ?
For example : http://bit.ly/2DFKkwM
I want someone to show me a visual presentation.
bcos i dont really understand. i am verry new
Essentially we are finding the gradient of the tangent to the graph at x=2
get them the limit definition of the derivative
Hmm. Sooo what is that blue line ?
Is it that tangent shiz i've been hearing about ?
@slender river
yes
Can u explain a tangent to me 😃
Ok...
tell me the slope formula
for what ?
slope of a line between two points
to get m ?
Ohk. You get the derivative by differentiating
wat
and then you plug in the number where x = __
Ok I can give an example
uh okay
Ok so find the slope of f(x) = x^3+4x-5 at x = 1
So first I have to differentiate that
which is f'(x) = 3x^2+4
and then i plug in X into that derivative
Is that it ...
mhm
Is that a yes? Or thinking like " Hmmmm "
@∮c F ⃑(x(t),y(t)) ∙ dr ⃑(t) = 0 You there bud 😃 ?
@hexed ermine Could ya explain it to me... Since he is afk
Scroll up and read it...
You want to know what a tangent is?
Its fine.. So i did it ^ the slope formula
yeah that's the derivative
and then at the point x it has the slope of what u evalueate the derivative at that x point
😕 ( confused ) ^
That blue line you showed me
3x^2 +4
The derivative of a function calculates the slope of the tangent line at that given point
When you differentiate that function, it creates a function of the tangent line slopes to that original function
so u need the x and y value of the point on the curve u want
so you can plug 1 into x for the derivative to get the slope of the tangent
Ohk I think i get you guys.
So basically the tangent is the slope of the function at a give point.... rrriggght ?
http://bit.ly/2DFjpl2
So that blue line is called a tangent
mhm
Ohk.
isnt that f'(n)
where N is the number at where you want the slope for?
how much harder is calc 1 vs precalc2/trig
but with a tangent its essentially the slope of the line but only 1 point is needed
Not very @fallen kite
Ohk.
ok thats good to know, because im having enough trouble with this shit
u guys recommend any websites? ive just been looking up random youtube vids
@fallen kite I am on the same page here
Yea. If u guys recommend any worksheet websites as well would be great.
good indeed
like
i love his work
it's a bit lengthy but it's fanstastic
like ur actually in the lecture hall and junk
super gud
Hey @hexed ermine So i just showed you what level i am on in calculus. Should I be learning limits rn ?
hmm ill check that out how many hours a week were u going at it
if you havent learnt them, yes
ehh, about 4
for about 2 weeks
@fallen kite
and now im here helping ppl with calc :v
2 weeks as in what, 80 hours?
u learned calc in 8 hours starting fresh? i dont believe that lol
His calc 1 series yes
I've did alot of practice on my own but ive spent 8 hrs of watching
yeh it's def possible
his vid series
i am of the same boat sort of but i dont have enough practice bc i cannot find problem sets to save my life
its not possible to learn all in 8 hours.. sure maybe u can watch all the vids, but to understand and retain all of it you'd need to be a god
Ive had a steady understanding
Helping others and doing problems on my own definitely helped
Yes
thats a good idea to get ahead
Did i do this right ?
f(x) = 3x^2+5 find the equation of the tangent line when x = 2
my answer was : y = 12x-17 ?
derivative
6x
Slope at x=2, 12
y=mx +b
y=12x
Or
y-y1=m(x-x1)
X1=2 so y1 = 17
y-17=12(x-2)
@limber compass
Oh yea How do i check That is what i needed help on
Can u teach me a way to check if the equation of the tangent line is correct?
I want to check without a calc
Then type in the line and the original graph
Graphing is only visual way to confirm
Oh you mean 7 turn
sorry. I have it on paper.
C = -7
Yup
Ohk let me try it
Its a clear tangent
Yee
One more _quick_question.
Ok
Do u know any websites that have worksheets realted to these type of questions ?
Only one I could guess is Khan Academy
what is this again? lol
equation of the tangent line at a point ?
right as in right or write ?
You called it by the correct name
Oh. : )
I've spent half an hour staring rock hard at this thing, browsed khan academy, etc; and I want to believe that the y-int is 1, what am I doing wrong?
y-intercept?
f(0)
well it is 1
most definitely a typo
if anyone finds anything please tell, my prof sent an email correcting some typos but did not address this question
@viscid thistle Hi bro 😃
I am having problems finding the equation of the tangent.
what point do you want the tangent at?
x = 5
what's the derivative of f at x=5?
459
Woah. how did u get it that fast
$f'(x) = 18x^2 + 9$
TendentiousTorturousTopics:
$f(5) = 800$
TendentiousTorturousTopics:
soo y=459x-1495; you got it right
Hmm. then why can't i see the line?
because you need to zoom in
tangent i mean
the curve is very steep
I did.
derivative of 459 means the slope is 459 lol
the red thing is the curve, and the blue the line I think
you can adjust the axis with the gear icon on the right
How ?
change the values
idk i'm on phone
ohh
Thank you 😃 @viscid thistle and @atomic zodiac
-10,000 ≤ y ≤ 10,000 or so
thnx
np
How can I go about solving this inequality? Really confused about how to get x by itself when it's in the denominator
add 5 and take the reciprocal
btw talking the reciprocal flips the direction of inequality
you could also consider each inequality separately to prove it to yourself
ie -1 < 120/x - 5
and 120/x - 5 < 1
@atomic zodiac Can you take each part and put it back together? I've never thought about doing that
@tawny nacelle That makes sense, thank you!
just do min < x < max

@atomic zodiac gotchya, thanks!
Hey guys!!I want to ask if this answer is correct or not?
Hmm. So what can u only get the derivative of ?
I know u can get it for a quadrative equation
but can it be ^4 ? ik that 3 is cubic
Logic is also fine,right?
why not keep it in?
@atomic zodiac So..I tried this function
4x^4+3x^3 + 8
and seems like 4 as an exponential doesnt work
No i am trying to get the equation of the slope
yes the derivative
I mean the equation of the tangent
wait I will give u the actual equation
7x^4+8x^3+9x p(0,4)
find the equation of the tangent when the coordinate is (0,4)
right
so find the derivative of the equation first
28x^3+24x^2+9 yes?
then plug in the x coordinate
28(0)^3+24(0)^2+9=9
which means your slope is 9
use the equation of a straight line with the given points to get the equation of the tangent
y=mx+c
4=9(0)+c so c=4
so the tangent line at p is y=9x+4
well
your point p isn't on the curve
unless your equation was supposed to be 7x^4+8x^3+9x+4
Ok so what should i be learning now ...
I have learned finding the equation of the tangent line .. now what ? @atomic zodiac 😃
o/
So my professor gave us this function to graph: f(x) = -2 (x - 4)^2 + 3. According to this site, it should end up looking like this: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/iettzueevt
However, if I wanted to do the table of values, she told us that we couldn't use any random numbers for the domain, instead we need to use specific values like -3, -4, 5 and 6, but why specifically those and not something like -1 through 2?
you can use any numbers
just make sure you have a wide enough range
so you get the shape right
OK, thank you!
So my sister was telling me to learn something like maximum and minimum
any idea on what ? she was talking about
and any yt tutorials would be great if u could link me
like extrema of a function?
probably
Uh Ok 😃
Can someone explain me why we differentiate to find the rate of change ?
because slope is rate of change?
Doesn't differentiating something just give us the gradient function of the original graph.
wow they've really dumbed things down
made a cookbook to solve problems
excellent teaching; might as well just teach the computer to do that for you
wow there let's not talk about gradients
We don't need to get into the definition of gradient, which coincides with derivative for functions of 1 variable
differentiating something gives you the instantaneous rate of change
2logx
is there a reason?
one is simpler than the other
mk
same reason you don't write 10 as 100000/10000 every time
np
?
Stationary points on the derivative are points of inflexions
Or possible points of inflexions
ohk.?
It's where concavity changes
Ohk. I don't understand these big words
Are you studying calculus?
I guess alternatively
You could think of x = 0 as where f(x) is most steep positively
With a slope of 2
Actually I can't read
Y coordinates are difficult
For derivatives
think about what the 2 means
it's the highest point on the parabola
meaning the highest slope will be at the same x coordinate
greatest positive slope rather
Like, it's hard to tell the slope is 2 exactly
But what's important is that's the greatest value of the derivative and it's positive
I've realized that I have big problems combining fractions with minuses
For example
$\frac{-3x^2-5x-2}{2\sqrt{1-x}} + -x\sqrt{1-x}$
Autistic Hoodie:
How would I interpret this?
$\frac{-3x^2-5x-2+2\sqrt{1-x}(-x\sqrt{1-x})}{2\sqrt{1-x}}$
Autistic Hoodie:
Apparently it's incorrect?
no thats correct
Probably need to expand the bracket and continue to do?
What are you trying to do? Simplify?
let the r + 1 th term be the what u want
and r + 1 th term is ${100 \choose r}(\frac{2}{x^2})^{100}(3x)^{100-r}$
soap:
lemme finish bruh
(2/x^2)^r 
ok 😃


