#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 328 of 1
Thx @brittle gyro
Can someone help me with my trig homework?
There’s a couple questions that I don’t know how to do

Just post the question
its a basic trig question
is the answer 2?
theres like 2 values of nq where sin nq = c right
and like
n is already determined so there's 2 values for q?
Guys a question, anybody have any ideas how to get this input equation equal to the one on right (1 ) equation i have tried dividing everything by cos^2 x and transforming cos to sin and then dividing by cos but just cant get this result please help, thanks in advance
$cos^2(2x)=2cos^2(x)-1$
Avlasov23:
that means cos sqrt11 = A
I don’t get it
$a*sin^2(x)+b(1-2sin^2(x))=1$
Avlasov23:
$cos(theta)/sin(theta)=2sin(theta)cos(theta)/(1-(1-sin^2(theta))$
AV8312:
$cos(theta)/sin(theta)=2sin(theta)cos(theta)/(sin^2(theta))$
AV8312:
Wait
Bottom is supposed to be 2sin^2(theta)
$cos(theta)/sin(theta)=2sin(theta)cos(theta)/(2sin^2(theta))$
AV8312:
$cos(theta)/sin(theta)=cos(theta)/sin(theta)$
AV8312:
And it’s proven
where are you stuck?
have you learned about properties of parallel lines?
I don’t remember
are terms like alternate angles, corresponding, etc familair to uyou?
I think so but I don’t remember
review those
What video should I watch to help would be helpful?
plenty of vids around to help with math
lowercase r but yeh
Ok what should I type to learn how do question number one?
properties of parallel lines
Ok I’ll let you know what I get
who can help with this 
Oh what i think I know what properties of parallel lines is
@silent plank
But it’s still doesn’t make sense
On how to figure out m
upon review are you able to identify stuff like alternate angles now?
can you see that the angles with measures:
68-m and 5m-10 are alternate angles?
well that is true but not up to that part yet
Ok what should I do then?
well they're alternate angles on parallel lines so their measures will be the same
68-m = 5m-10
would be the equation to set up to determine m
no
78/6 isn't 3
yes
Ok I’ll see what I can fill in
I’ll let you know what I get
Ok so n=55 m=13 and p=62.5?
@silent plank
what are you doing to get p?
Since one side 55 I subtracted that out of 180 and then divided it by two to get the two sides which is 62.5
But now I’m not sure what should I do?
@silent plank
youre doing random things
stopping pinging me every time ...
i'm here...
Ok sorry
do you see those congruence markings at 5m-10 and the angle next to it?
Yes but I forgot what it means
So it’s also 55
yes
So p = 70
yes
Wonder why it says exam 3 at the top 
What timing
like a boss
That was a difficult thing oops
Can you help me?
not on an exam
which clearly it was even tho you deleted it
so i dont think i can
sorry
Ok thanks anyways
academic dishonesty can ruin your entire career
even tho it seems like its no big deal
Don't ask for help on exams in the future mate you're just playin urself
Ok my bad sorry
$2\sin^2{x} + 9\sin{x} +4 = 0$ ?
moshill1:
@mighty zodiac
it's a quadratic
Yes
do you know how to solve quadratics?
Yeah but not in 0,2pie
@mighty zodiac assume cos(3*theta) = x and replace it in the equation and solve
can anyone help me with this? i've been trying to solve this for hours but i couldn't find any solution
was this question taken from an IMO in 1800s?
What's the stuff on the left and right of the diagram the 1/2 and 1?
$$ \frac{1}{2}$$
noice
what shape is on the bottom? I got the volume of the square. Need the other one thanks
square pyramid
ty
For the area of a triangle formula to work, does it have to be trig function of Sine that is used?
For this example 1/2•base•aSinC is used but what happened if C isn’t available (or for some reason I can’t use C)
And for a question I have to use another angle (arrowed in photo, let’s call it F)
so is 1/2 • base • aCosineF = 1/2 • base • aSineC?
combine sec^2 and csc^2
please hapen to ping me for an answer
@royal citrus
wdym combine
add the fractions together
oh those
gotta know yo trig identities son
^
,, \frac{1}{cosA.sinA}
Inheritanc-e ♦:
now what do I do?
trig identities again dude
I suggest you review your trig identities
remember
I don't, but ok i will look at it again and try my best to see what the next step is
can someone help with a trig question?
post the question
any intuitive reason for why principal radii are on orthogonal planes?
what's a principal radius :?
<@&286206848099549185> lol
it asks to use cosine law, I'm confused
@still laurel just use either side for the equation. cosine(34)=5 or 9/x
@swift summit right but what is the logic behind that, I get the calculation but how
because cosine=adjacent/hypotenuse. so by plugging the information in you end up with that
is there logic in this question behind how you pick which side is adjacent
thats all
oh no either side works just as well as the other
wait
you do know what adjacent means, yes?
ok np
I don't know how to do it but I got 13.5 m
@Sarim1k#6558 the cosine law:
$$c^2 =a^2 + b^2 -2ab\cdot\cos(C)$$
ramonov:
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for details. (You may edit your message)
because cosine=adjacent/hypotenuse. so by plugging the information in you end up with that
@swift summit you only use this with right angles
snap:
Since the question itself says all permissible values of x, I don't think you have to list out non-permissible values
snap:
so, I appearantly have all the info I need to say that E,F,A and B are on the same circle... tho I'm failing to see how they are... all I know is that AFB and AEB are the same size, basically.
can you send the original problem?
if you can read dutch 😅
what is the goal?
What does them being on the same circle mean?
proof that ABF and E are on the same circle
And define "being on the same circle"
so ABFE is cyclic
I think you already got the solution
ok I see
|| so angle ADE = EAD = y because triangle ADE is isosceles, same thing for triangle FCB (angle FCB = CBF = x). For the exterior angle theorem we have AEB = 2y and AFB = 2x, but notice x = y (angle ADB = ACB) because they are on the same segment AB, so we conclude AEB = AFB, which makes the quadrilateral cyclic. ||
id see it if EAB and FBA were the same size, but I havent proven that.. right?
Im so confused, I got all that information but im just not seeing how u can say its cyclic rn
😅
this is my solution
I had all that, but I just dont understand the last bit
AEB and AFB are both right angles right?
no
it's just a condition that makes quadrilaterals cyclic
you could think of it as angles AEB and AFB being on the same segment AB
but in class they said, AEB + ABE = 180 makes it cyclic
what are you talking about
OH
TY, got it
XD
seeing it now LMAO
that's another condition
yeahh, makes sense now I think about it
there are several ways to prove that a quadrilateral is cyclic
Triangle ADE is a right triangle, AED and AEB are both right angles
Same on other side
No?
Side AE and DE are equal length
just isosceles
this is the proof if you are interested
atleast I got everything but the conclusion myself... LMAO
NEVERMIND
do both sin(90-a) and sin(90+a) = cosa?
Hi everyone
hi
Hi

some good questions pls
im stumped
16
I just put it in desmos and found which value it equals 64, I don't know how to do it algrebraically
I tried doing it but I gave up then I used desmos
to see if x is equaled to a good number
can someone help me by walking me through how to evaluate cos(-225) with a answer in fraction form.
I think it has something to do with the unit circle and the fundamental trigonometric identity
Can you pinpoint, at least approximately, where -225° lands on the unit circle?
Is it at 9 o'clock?
No you're not dumb haha, but you'll want to know what the unit circle is and how to find where an angle lands on it
i mean like it starts at (1,0)
Basically, you always start at 3:00 or (1,0) yeah
The negative means "go clockwise"
180 would be half way around, 270 would be 3/4 way around
But you have 225, so it lands half way between those two, somewhere around 10 o'clock
That part make sense?
Yeah haha, if you want to say it that way, that is good too
is that then (7pi)/6 whatever thing?
Big thing to realize, it's 45° away from the y-axis!
like distance
So you'll want to relate it to something to do with cos(45)
Which is - you'll want to relate it to √2 / 2
so how do we figure this out?
is it just that 225/45 =5
so that the 45 degree ange on the unit circle like the √2 / 2
or like
dunno
What's the sign of cos(-225)? That is, what's the sign of the x-value when the terminal arm is near 10 o'clock?
its negative
You got it
so like because 45 is a factor of 225
and like 45 degrees is the √2 / 2 thing on the unit circle
and that 225 is on the negative side of x
its just -√2 / 2
?
Well, -225 is
yea
But yes exactly
so the awnser would be -√2 / 2?
You got it
but how would we apply this to a diffrent problem?
Sure, have another example?
because liek some problems arent a factor of 45
Same idea first - get a sense of where it lands approximately
You got it
so its more logic than like math?

Then two blend together a lot haha
****like
Kaynex, you are certainly cool
It's not all symbol pushing
That's the "hip" term
@hollow raven
And thank you but as my name implies, I am not-cool
I see otherwise
@silver spruce
Then you want to focus on the y-value, not the x-value
Otherwise the question is the same
thx
Hey how do u do this?
Inheritanc-e ♦:
apply a^4 = a^2*a^2 and pytahgorean trig identities
Inheritanc-e ♦:
parentheses, also assuming that you actually had those,
you aren't distributing properly
OA=AB=1
Find PQ
me?
thus finding the length of arc PQ
Purely algebraic solution
trignometric equations aren't algebra?
are you absolutely sure about trig not being allowed?
I don’t like transcendental functions in my basic geometry problem
It can be done without reference to angles
I don't think you can but if you do then I guess good for you
ok god
hello. I have an exercise with imaginary numbers and I don't know how to do it. The +- is the difficult part for me. Why is it here? What am I supposed to do with it? Would be really glad if someone could explain.
but there's only one answer in the answers sheet.
Although if this is all it means then thank you.
I'll try to solve it with both
https://discordapp.com/channels/268882317391429632/326138757474680852/782333576678080603
the length of this 2? Right? Cause the complete answer is supposed to be 1 but the only way imo where that would happen is if the length of the complex number would be 1 too
but I keep getting 2
how are you getting 2
doesnt tell me how you're getting 2 because that's 1
"If the tangent vector of a parametrized curve is constant, the image of the curve is part of a straight line."
what does that mean? xd
huh?
if the tangent is the same at all points
wouldn't that mean the curve is just a line?
if we are in R^3 a line is a plane, or a line is a line?
it would be a plane in R3
okk ty
no it’s a line in any R^n
ahh thanks
a vector being constant means all its components are constants right?
what's the tangent vector of a plane?
a vector being constant means all its components are constants right?
yes
what's the tangent vector of a plane?
doesn’t make sense to speak of one. rather we speak of a plane characterized by a normal vector
do you know synthetic division?
if not, i'd look up a video on how to do it
it's basically long division, but with polynomials
how do i find the angle for the vector W= -2i-2sqrt3j
could anyone help me with complex numbers
sure wassup with ur complex numbers
@ashen brook For your first question of vectors
I'm assuming you're asking between vector and x axis?
$$ W = -2i -2\sqrt{3}j $$
Doodaide
Thus, you know that your angle between the x axis and the singular 2D vector is equal to this
$$ let \theta = angle
\therefore \theta = \arctan{(\frac{-2\sqrt{3}}{-2})} $$
Doodaide
text goes outside the dollar signs if you want spaces and dont want it to be italics
ah my bad sorry still getting used to the bot lol
$\frac{\pi}{3}$
Sneaky
display math mode and normal math mode, you can google it
ok ty
OA=AB=1
Find PQ
@silk patio thats ez
two equations can be formed
x+y=2, x^2+pq^2/4=1 y^2+pq^2/4=2
PQ=root(7)/2
help pls
@obtuse tapir not right, close tho
kinda need an answer asap
Why
We don't give away answers here
Can you post your work so that we can try to spot your mistake
Consider drawing triangle OBC
Can you think of a way of getting angle BOC
Using a specific circle theorem
note that angles BOC and BAC correspond to the same arc
Look at the first one
Are you able to get angle y considering the theorem i just sent
What about it
Yes, 56°
now wut.
If we split the triangle like this
Let me get a better pic
Look at the green triangle
Remember we splitted the triangle in 2, so the angle BOP will be half of 56°
Now look at the 5th theorem here, according to this, on the green triangle we get a right triangle with 2 known angles and one known side
@brisk latch understood everything i've just said so far?
hm
sorry im learning from 5 different peoople at onc
Huh

It's better to learn from 1 person decently than from 5 people unefficiently
Focus on one
its 4 different people in 1 server and u
Come back whenever you are able to follow me efficiently
What do you expect me to say
how so
It’s just wrong
whats the solution
<@&268886789983436800> advertiser spam
@upper karma no advertising. and definitely no spam.
this is not the place to do so
and not the manner either
@silk patio
,rccw
What are you calculating? @obtuse tapir
Is PB=1?
I need my program to make assumptions based on the contours of a surface for the path of a rope moving across it. Any chance I can find that on this server?
please post your question
I’m able to ascertain the 3D coordinates of points along an uneven surface, but I don’t have any kind of math background, so I can’t use the data. My main goal is to determine location of the peaks and troughs and the distance between them, in the context of the programming environment I’m using.
Essentially, I’m looking for a mathematician to join my development team (me), to develop a rope physics simulation.
I see
so you want to know where the local maxima and minima are
based on data points
so your surface is just a collection of 3D points
there are many ways to do that if you don't know the actual function that parametrizes your surface
one thing you could do is
define a neighborhood of size 10 units (for example)
look for the point that has the highest/ lowest height in this neighborhood
in computer vision we use a technique
where we convolve a surface with the Sobel filter
to detect all the local maxima
you could probably try something like that too
That sounds very likely to be true, but I don’t know how to do much of that, simply because I am using brute force to program, up to this point. I’m very versed with the tools, but lack all but the most basic math ability.
That’s interesting.
So, it averages the image and reduces it to a lower resolution?
this video is to help you understand how 2D convolution works
so you could do it for your program
replace the filter in this video by the sobel filter
which will look for local maxima on your surface
since your surface is represented as a grid with value in each grid representing the height of the surface at that location
What’s a sobel filter?
it's a filter that can find local maxima
we use it in image processing to do edge detection
Here’s an example surface. I want my rope to understand where the peaks and troughs are so it can lay across it naturally. How would I apply a sobel filter to this, would you say?
you should convert this to a 2D grid where (x, y) is the location of a point on the surface and the value at a grid square at some (x, y) location represents the height of the point on the surface
then convolve that grid with Sobel operator
What is the Sobel operator? How would I apply it here?
?
have you not been reading anything I just said?
scroll over and read what I just wrote
Sorry, I don’t know how to replace the filter in the video with a Sobel filter.
@dusky surge
@round isle Ok, I googled it and now I see that these filters are in a common format. So, I can apply this within my program, no problem, but what will the resulting values represent?
It will be reduced to a smaller grid, for one thing.
*BC^2 not pb
to prevent your grid from getting reduced, you can pad it with a border. The new grid, after convolution with sobel operator, will be the same size. You'll get two grids: one after convolving with the horizontal Sobel filter and the other due to the vertical Sobel operator. For each corresponding location, you square and add the Sobel values and take square root. The new grid will now contain a lot of large values (representing minima and maxima). Now, you can define another window where the highest value will be highlighted only and you can use that to check the y value in the original grid (before applying the Sobel operator)
you can also try the Canny Edge detector
you better do some reading on these algos on your own time
Built a machine that can apply it. Now I need to comprehend what I can do with it.
https://youtu.be/v9qXkVIjJ2U
why are you not padding the sides
this will let you get a grid of the same size
after applying sobel operator
Because I have no idea what I’m doing. I just needed to finish this in a basic form, now I can expand it.
K
That’s pretty much already there, because I didn’t limit the movement of the filter
And I drop the value cubes with a button press
So, at each location on the grid I square the horizontal and vertical and then add them and then “take the square root”?
I have a rather hard time figuring this problem out, experimentation with GeoGebra shows me nothing particularly useful
@round isle In the video he places the sum of the kernel in the top left. Where does the sum of each kernel position go in the Sobel kernel?
the middle of the kernel
What's the most straightforward way to find the square root if you only have basic calculator functions? (I told you, I'm terrible at math.)
How do I get the square root? Your instructions have me doing that.
I have zero math ability. Basically handicapped.
what do you mean you have zero math capability
I don't understand it
how old are you?
Very old
huh?
40
you didn't go to school?
I didn't finish middle school
US
???
wtf
I thought every kid is supposed to complete high school in US
legally required to
Not at all
in some states I think compulsory education is up to middle school
wait a second
you don't know basic math
but you know how to program?
how is that even possible
I'm using brute force methods and a very friendly programming environment
what language are you programming in?
?
It's a platform, I guess. It's called Dreams.
Yes
bruh, is it really possible to make stuff in it without coding?
That's no coding, per say. It's all visual nodes that you wire together.
so, you don't know what a square root is?
No
well
I could tell you what it is
but before that
please do something about your education
you won't get far with the kind of stuff you're doing
without math
so, now
square root:
That's why I'm here
2 x 2 = 4
when we take square root of 4
we get 2
because when we multiply 2 with itself
we get 4
so, taking square root is breaking a number down into its multiplicative components
Ok, that makes sense
And how would I get the square root with basic calculator functions?
well you don't
calculators have square root button
let me guess
Dreams doesn't have square root?
No it doesn't
ok
so, square root is not necessary
you can just square the x and y results and add them
that alone would be fine
I don't need it?
no you don't
^(1/2) works right
oof
Dreams has "power of". Is that what that is?
Yes
If u take ur number to the power 0.5 u will get the square root
Use a calculator bro lmao
So the square root of 150 is 12.247? That's what I'm getting.
That sounds accurate
ha
didn't know Dreams has power of
what exactly are you trying to build in Dreams anyway?
I'm trying to build a system that gives the program some general awareness of the shape of the terrain.
Lots of uses for that, but currently I hope to make a rope react naturally as it goes across terrain and over ledges.
I want high points to make that portion of the rope resist being dragged, and that kind of thing.
The pink and green cubes are the horizontal and vertical scan data, and the grey one is the combined and square root.
https://youtu.be/TOZBIWn9xNY
what have you tried so far
Not much, still confused on how I would start off.
What's the relationship between <FAD and <CAB
well you have two important straight lines here
CD and BF
sum of all angles on a straight line is 180
so use that here
Well since im setting up a system of equations,
9x + y = 180
and I need something else.
Good thing to note here
90-4x+36 = 5x, because 4x + <FAE = 90, so <FAE = 90 - 4x, and 5x is an opposite angle of 36 + <FAE, so 5x = 36 + <FAE
Since both angle summations are equivalent, 90-4x+36 = 5x
Gotcha, thanks for the help. Solved it now.
I'm getting more confused lol
Solving for theta Cos(Theta/2) Does theta = 2ArcCos(Hyp/Adj)?
can you actually pull the one half out or is this purely a half angle
I assume that this would be some kind of Cos^-1 of a Half angle?
use half angle formula
you mean set it equal to half angle and solve for theta?
Well I am looking at this quaterion math for complex number and I am trying understand how the half angle become 2ArcCos
I'll link it
and?
so
q = cos(angle/2) + i ( x * sin(angle/2)) + j (y * sin(angle/2)) + k ( z * sin(angle/2))
at Theta = 0 degrees
imaginary part becomes 0
imaginary part?
because sine theta/2 = 0
what imaginary part?
yes
yes
so check this out
check out what?
that is not the imaginary part first of all
the i, j and k are unit vectors along x, y and z axis
your high school is teaching you quaternions?
the imaginary part is the unit vectors
crap
I am out of my depth here then
I have not studied quaternions
best you wait for someone who has
Ignore it for a moment
I am just rusty
at the trig
all you need to know is as theta -> 0 you get Q = 1 + 0
W = real part
W = cos(theta/2)
so
q = 1 + i 0 + j 0 + k 0
gives us this angle = 2 * acos(qw) = 0
so working back from above equation qw = 1
angle = 2 * acos(qw)
they are saying angle is 0
so just put that in there and solve for qw
ha
hmm
QW = 1 at 0
but how did they solve for theta
thats the fundamental thing i am forgetting
I assume convert it to half angle
and then solve for theta?
then take the Arc Cos
I see it now
thanks
QW = 1 Because the one side is 1
it has to be
im confused on this
y it upside down
if you know that two sides of a triangle have lengths 4 cm and 6 cm, what specifically do you know about the length of the third side if the triangle is a right triangle?
consider theorems related to right triangles
i mean it 90 degrees
well one of the angles will be 90°
ever heard of pythagoras?
if the triangle is right, the sides will satisfy pythagoras' theorem
If theta is on radians
Very important to note
290° isn't on radians
@dire scaffold do you know how to manage from degrees to radians?
no
Ok then that's not the formula you're looking for
o
sorry about that kinda just glanced quick
The formula you are looking for is $A_s=\frac{\theta}{360}πr²$ where $\theta$ is in degrees
Al𝟛dium
2cos(75-β)-sinβ=0
How could I solve this?
Hey Samwise, you were my favorite star wars villian.
Wow dude
Of course I understand
After all, I killed Yoda
First, I'd get the 75 degrees into radians. Following up, split up cos(5π/12 - β) using subtraction identity for cosine.
After you applied the identity, manipulate the formula in terms of acos(x) + bsin(x). If you are having trouble with getting it in said form, then I'd recommend you to completely expand it and factor out the cos(x) and sin(x).
Using another important identity, acos(x) + bsin(x) = Rcos(x - c), where R is the sqrt(a² + b²) and c = arctan(b/a).
Setting Rcos(x - c) = 0, we have x = nπ + π/2 + arctan(b/a), where n is the set of integers. Don't forget to state this if your teacher wants it to be solve generally.
Thanks!
Hey guys, How do i solve this problem. Am I allowed to draw halves?
Am I allowed to draw between two points
I tried a ton of times
My teacher couldn't solve it
what would be the equation for finding the six sixth roots of z=-1
"Find the six sixth roots for z=-1. Leave your answers in trigonometric form."
de moivre
i think its like = (cos (180) + i sin (180)) but im not for sure what to put infront
nvm
i dont think its that
can someone explain what I need to do to find the missing angles
#8: what is the relationship between <1 and 105 degrees?
#9: what is the relationship between <2 and 105 degrees?
#10: what is the relationship between <3 and <7?
#11: what is the relationship between <4 and 80 degrees?
#12: what is the relationship between <6 and <3 or <7?
#13: what is the relationship between <7 and 105 degrees?
#14: think about the sum of the angles of a triangle and the vertical angles around the triangle.
15#: what is the relationship between <9, <8, and 80 degrees?
you might want to rearrange the order you go for these problems
Can anyone help with trig?
@olive plaza yes, i can help with that question you totally posted
I can't figure out how to post it
anyways
the question is estimate a value for cot 140
just post the picture... or type it out
If it's just estimate i'd probably average the values of cot(120) and cot(150)
can somebody tell me if these are wrong please?
@ashen brook
Still looking for it?
yes
@ashen brook
Note that you care about when
z⁶ = -1 = cos(180 + 360k) + isin(180 + 360k)
Where you can put any k in, and that gives a coterminal angle. That bit make sense?
yeah i understood that part im just not sure what to put in cis form for example x
x cis 90
ah i think i got it
@umbral snow thankyou, i was able to complete the problem!
I did the first one but I don’t understand it I get that sin is y and cos is x but how do I use that for this problem
for 58?
@vast python basically you know that within your cartesian plane, each basic trig operation (sin, cos, tan) will be positive in 2 areas
Sorry for the bad drawing btw
Now for 58, you know that Sin is positive, and Cos is negative. There is only one quadrant where this is possible and it can be solved through a process of elimination
Only quadrant 2 overlaps these two properties thus the answer is II
hope this helps
Ted
Please ping me when you answer.
I think it's a really badly worded "arrowhead rule"
you know this one
@junior light
Aah okay, that makes sense.
angle at the centre = 2*angle at the circumfrence
The wording is kinda absurd indeed. Thank you!
Sorry I’m late at answering but this helped me a lot @slate blade TYSM
if you know that two sides of a triangle have lengths 4 cm and 6 cm, what specifically do you know about the length of the third side if the triangle is a right triangle?
i dont understand how to do this
ik u use pythag theorem
but like how
Do you know that the two given sides are not the hypotenuse?
I'll call that unknown side length x. It's either that x is the hypotenuse, or 6 is
So there's only two possible triangles here
ok
It can't be the case that 4 is the hypotenuse, as 6 is a longer side
And the hypotenuse is always the longest of course
tru
where is the basic algebra channel?
Yep! That's if the unknown side is the hypotenuse
ok then theres one more right?
Yeah, the case where 4² + c² = 6²
is possible
Yeah. There's no other triangles you can make
So you know the other side has to be one of those two
third side = 2root5 or 2root13?
Ye
ok thx for help
Np. Feel free to ask if you have anything else!
what does m∠C mean? triangle c or angle c?
measure of angle C
ty
im confused on this
Answer to this lol?
what have you tried so far
chain rule probably
I got through...
there’s not much of it I know how to do
<@&286206848099549185> i have a simple question, ok so like
is the arc 2x the central angle?
cuz i feel like i remember seeing that
and if not
how does one
get said arc
@inland canyon $s = r\theta$, where s is arc length bounded by the central angle, r is the radius, and $\theta$ is the central angle in radians
Sir Topham Hatt
yea what's up?
that made no sense
at all
the fucking a thta
theta
and the fuck is a money sign = 4
r*
well ik that
ah ok
so
s is arc length
and it is equal to r (the radius)
and the central angle theta
theta is a variable
wait
which typically represents some sort of angle
so the arc is = to the radius
arc is = to the radius times the central angle in radians
dawg imma be real i dont even know what a radian is
lol i appreciate the honesty
is that like
do you have this question for homework or an assignment?
a radian is a unit of angle measure
its just a warm up im doing
ah ok
ok so like
you know degrees right
hold on
360˚ in a circle?
yes
ok great
now
by definition
360˚ is equal to 2π radians
so
π radians = 180˚
it's weird


