#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 325 of 1
The answers should be -3/2 and 1/3 right?
Yes
No you just got the a and c values switched
Ok
The correct quadratic formula would be $\frac{ 7\pm 11}{-12}
The correct quadratic formula would be $\frac{ 7\pm 11}{-12}$
Ok thanks btw
And that gives you the answers you were looking for
Thx 
Second Mikey:
when it asks for this is it asking for just the one missing side or the whole triangle?
including angles and such
very vague question, best you ask your teacher
I'd interpret it as the whole thing
would someone be able to help me identify where is this r=sqrt(m^2+1) equation is coming from?
its a calculus question but the equations at work here are more geometry based
where is figure 11
@round isle its not needed but i can draw it for you
the width is 2 so if it's like a regular roof it'll be like two triangular prisms stacked face-to-face on the rest of the house
each with half the width, 1
slope is m and width is 1 so height is m
and it's a right-angled triangle, h^2 = 1^2 + m^2 = 1 + m^2
which they've called r idk why
Ahh that makes sense @wise hornet . thank you sm
h3ll0
<@&286206848099549185>
rob is trying to open a can. he wants to find the arc length the can opener needs to travel to open the can half way the rtadius of the can is 1.5 inches
round your answer to the nearest hundreth of an inch
what do u need to find todo this
like i have all the info
it wouldnt be 3 would it
cuz thats the diameter
or would it be 7.06
can someone help me with (a)?
i dont really know the congruence rule im looking for here
thanks!
When it comes to understanding a general topic or rule, I’d recommend googling before anything @zenith garnet
how would i go about solving this
let's see the work you have done so far
ok
let's walk through this
we see two right angles triangles inside the bigger right-angled triangle
can you define the hypotenuse for right and left triangle in terms of x?
using Pythagoras theorem
isnt it uhh
once you do that, you can use the newly discovered expression for base and height of the large right-angled triangle to setup an equation
since you already know the value of the hypotenuse for that
don't forget the square root
oh yea
I think you meant the right one
do the same for the left one
and now you have the base and height in terms of x
which means you can setup a final equation in x by applying Pythagoras on the large triangle
what proportions?
maybe, I'm not sure. You can experiment with this method if you wish. I found Pythagoras pretty obvious because of the right-angled triangles
yeah
Pictures, people, pictures
Aren’t there little squares you can drag and drop into those positions
no they are not
You have to type them out?
yeah
What do you need help with
im just confused idk what to fill in the blanks with im lost
This seems like a general lack of knowledge on the subject then
its about complementary angles
Certainly you took notes and paid attention in class and all of that
and you have to fill in reasons
perhaps
You’ve never done this in class, and you have homework for it
So did you take notes
no i did not
Have you literally tried googling anything before coming here
yes
And what exactly did you google
Because google has a lot on this I know it
Because google has a lot on everything
In fact it has close to everything on everything
Yeah, for future reference you cannot come in here and basically have someone do it for you, especially when you say you didn’t take any notes and especially when it’s a problem that involves basic knowledge of terms (not even a specific problem with a quirky twist to it that you’ve never seen)
And when google is always there
no wonder why you don't have helper role you dont even help you just tell them to go to google
👍
How old are you
listen man i was just confused on a question you didn't have to be a dick about it with this whole "its basic knowledge bro"
Not once did I say it was basic knowledge now did I
I said there’s google
And you are doing homework for a class
That showed you how to do it
And you didn’t take notes
And you’re here because you’re last minute doing your homework
I’m saying I’m not doing your fucking homework for you

no memes in general?
if you look at me would you think im a positive vision?
ofcourse
just checking
@tough pilot are u obese
Do you have any questions that relate to this chat that cannot be easily googled
Why are you doing This
???
I thought maths contests have stricter invigilation
they do but online contest exist
invigilation, I like that
my brain perfectly made me can't calculate this crap
need the base area 
I can't imagine I got stuck in revision
the... base area?
like, the area of the two (supposedly) rectangular faces at the very bottom?
Group up the a^2 terms, the a terms, and the constant terms. Like you’re doing regular addition and subtraction
TeddyAlex:
No
You can only add or subtract between the a^2 terms, add or subtract between the a terms, and add or subtract between the constant terms
TeddyAlex:
@kindred walrus Is this correct?
What was the original equation again? It started at $4a^2 + \cdots$
Majez_tic:
Here:
$4a^2 + 2a - 1 - (2a^2 + 1) = 4a^2 + 2a - 1 - 2a^2 - 1 = (4a^2 - 2a^2) + (2a) - 1 - 1$
Majez_tic:
I tried to write it in a way so that you could see how the terms are grouped
All that’s left is for you to simplify
$2a^2+2a-2$
TeddyAlex:
Looks good to me
TeddyAlex:
@somber coyote aaaaa
wat
I'm confused how to work this out
introduce a variable to represent on you your angles
I tried doing 180-x=15(180-x)-12 for mine but it didn't work out
don't try to jump to the finish like that.
don't worry about the supplementary property for now
different question...?
let x be the measure of what's referred to as the "other" angle
Idk if it’s right
let x be the measure of what's referred to as the "other" angle
@silent plank oh I see but I'm confused how the equation would be
since like I haven't tried these problems
what's 12 less than 15 times of x
15x-12?
yes
the measures of your angles are:
x and
15x - 12
ahh
and their sum is 180°
thx!
can anyone help me with mine ;p
I got 12 and 168 so I'm pretty sure that's right
once again I'm confused how to format this since there's both supplementary and complementary
apply the definitions of supplement and complement
the complement of a is : 90° - a
the supplement of b is 180° - b
and combine those properties
I also need help with this exercise
I have doubts with exercise number 11
I barely understand because my teacher doesn’t explain it very well.
the complement of a is : 90° - a
the supplement of b is 180° - b
and combine those properties
@silent plank I believe it would be 9(180-x)+37=90-y, but I'm not sure how I would solve with both variables
what do x and y represent
I think the supplement/complement?
I'd recommend trying to use the minimal amount of variables
let x be the angle you want to find
(supplement of x) = 37 more than 9 times the (complement of x)
what's the supplement of x
what's the complement of x
90-x?
ahh
okay
well I got a really large decimal, so I'm not sure if it's wrong or it's meant to be like that
you'd get a terminating decimal which isn't that bad
(its also between 0 and 90°) which is fine.
if it wasn't clear this part so far is only focusing on finding the angle: x
I need help with this
Please, anyone?
I only need help with one exercise so that I can understand the rest.
It looks like you've got some Side-Side-Angle stuff going
Also there's some isosceles triangles all over the place. Also, 5 + 2 = 7
@upper karma
yes
thanks
Prove AZ ~= BX using a flow chart proof
bruh
solve it ur self
If they came here it's probably because they need help and they can't?
wtf is a flow chart proof
do you mean the horrid 2 column proof
or is it something worse I haven't heard about
If they came here it's probably because they need help and they can't?
@upper karma lol I said that s a joke
@silent plank I took geo last year I remember it was like basically the two colummn chart but in english as an essay
@silent plank its like boxes and arrows
pretty much two column one just put into boxes
so worse layout
yeah
can you help
i dont know how to do it
i can explain it in paragraph but not two column
how'd you explain it in a paragraph
We are given that ∠X ≅ ∠Z and ("XY" ) ̅ ≅ ("ZY" ) ̅. Because of the ASA Postulate which states that if two angles and one side of a triangle are congruent to that of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent with each other. With this, we can see the two angles, X and Z, are congruent with each other and line segments XY and ZY are congruent with each other. This means that the two triangles are congruent because of the ASA postulate. Lastly, this means that line segments BX and AZ are congruent because congruent triangles have corresponding sides.
i aint that good at proofsa
i had to learn to do them from a video with virtual
well for 2-col you can cut out like most of the words
yeah i just dont know what postulates or theorems to use
@stark bolt if I am to be honest just get a tutor to all the work for you if u have no passion and still want an A
col1: | col2
statement | sort description of the justification
yeah ive done them before
don't be so strict witht he specific name
<X cong <Z | given
yeah thats easy
also you didn't provide the full justification for why you can apple ASA here
<Y cong <Y (reflexive property)
otherwise from the first 2 statements all you have is A and S
a description that ASA can be used.
but not enough to justify how it applies here
well basically state the 2 givens,
3rd line will be your <Y = <Y
and then 4th line: triangles congruent ASA
oh alright thanks
and then 5th line for the conclusion
whats that
search up images for an example
i've never used acronyms for those
it means Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent
yeh that works
because one letter off, different people may use slightly different acronyms
oh
not quite
you want the combination of your A, S, A to lead to congruence
whearas in your setup, you've implied that congruence of those angles leads to congruence of the sides
something like that
yeh, that's bad-ish
it defeats the whole purpose of a flow chart
i'd recommend the better way
alright
im gonna email the teacher
two more proofs left in the assignment
i mean 3
@silent plank would you be able to help with this one sorry
SSS
Help for homework
Wait
Its AAS
Who do you know its AAS please explain so i know better.
It goes angle angle side
how"
I think
Son, can you help me w/ sum rq
dm
What do you think?
he thinks idk
@jagged sapphire, those triangles share the same one side,
@grizzled lantern sss?
No you only 4 sides
@grizzled lantern its Sss isn't it?
yes
ok thank u
yes
no
you only have one pair of congruent sides
given
you'll need to incorporate parallel line theorems
@silent plank would internal angles be included?
for what
what do you think
Sas im 70% sure
why 70%
Side angle side
what are you given?
the indicated congruent angle isn't between the corresponding sides
I think its sas
wait
couldnt it be HL
if the hypotenuses are congruent the triangles are congruent
its not sas for the reason mentioned above
oh
H alone isn't enogh
So its HL
yes
i don't get it
If the hypotenuses are congruent and two sides are congruent it means the triangle is congruent
HL means hypotenuse and leg i think
HL or RHS is also a valid justification for congruence
given a right triangle, the triangle can be solved given any 2 sides from pythag or otherwise
the last one because you need more congruent sides
and bc and dc are already congruent
so AB=AD
yes
as the name implies ASS is ass (in case it wasn't clear it isn't a valid justification)
lmao
Booty is Booty
i wish i could do that stuff
instead of stupid proofs
@jagged sapphire anything else
wym
c to b?
no thats just a side
it looks like 90°
the question is cut off
The right angle is in an L shape
looks like there's info above that
@silent plank might be answers from another question
looks like the same font as the answer choices
without given info the question is ambiguous af
oh
what's needed for HL to be applied?
If the hypotenuse and one leg of a right triangle are congruent to the hypotenuse and one leg of another right triangle, then the triangles are congruent
so @stark bolt
what do you think
yessir
i think its AAS
how are you getting ASA
@silent plank would you be able to help me with another proof
which angles are congruent and is the congruent side between those angles
on the first one
to find x combine 90 and 50 and subtract that from 180
then add 60 and 75 and subtract that from 180
sorry im not good at explaining
it would be easier to show u on paper
Yeah I understand what your saying tho
What are the extra lines coming out of the triangle tho
So for the top middle one the x would just be 70?
yes
theyre vertical angles
the other angle to the bottom right in that triangle would be 50
since 180-130=50
can someone help me with these
its due tonight by midnight
why are you mentioning your deadline
nobody is going to give you answers straight away because you have a deadline
lmao i think thats how it works. We do our homework if the teacher tells us a deadline
if they dont we never do it
we don't care whether you do your homework on time or not
that's your responsibility
we will only guide you
so, I don't see why you mention your deadline like this
ok
please post a picture of your question here
let's see what you have done so far
i dont have a single clue on what to do
@round isle I dont think the problem gives me enough information
why don't you start by labeling the diagram according to the information provided to you
an isosceles and equilateral triangle
@round isle can u plz help
i labeled it, what do i do after
I told you to post here what you've done
don't just tell me that you've done it
show it to me
its on the paper, so i dont really need to label it
its already labeled for him in the problem isn't it?
take a picture and post it here. Remember, no one will give you answers here. We will only look at what you've done and try to guide you
im not asking for answers i just dont wanna label something that is already labeled for me
@loud cradle can we help you?
what have you done so far?
do you know how to compute the area of an arc?
no
sorry, I mean sector of a circle
idk the formula
do you know the formula for area of a circle?
@round isle did u read what i said
pi r^2
can someone tell me the y-int of x^2-22=24
@proud gust I have already explained to you that you need to show me some progress on your end. This could be in the form of anything really. I need to understand that you at least understand the basic terminologies being used in the question
@loud cradle do you know the area of a quadrant?
so, this is a quarter of a full circle
yeah wouldn't it be 1/4 pi r^2
okay good
let's say, I cut out a piece from a full circle
and the angle of this piece is theta
do you know how to calculate the area of that?
why are you guessing, has your teacher taught you this yet?
i don't remember let me check
@round isle im hear to get help it shows me the answer already but i want to learn. i havent written anything down because i dont know what to write and what your telling me to label is already labeled on the sheet. so i don't to take up space since its limited
@upper karma I don't udnerstand your question. What is y-int?
*here
1/2 r^2 theta?
ummm y intercept
has your teacher taught you this yet @loud cradle ?
@loud cradle then why are you posting it here?
I honestly can't tell if you're just looking for someone to solve your homework or whether this is a genuine math compeition exercise
@round isle Im here for you to help me so i haven't written anything since the only thing you told me to write is already labeled
@upper karma can you show me where you saw this question?
@upper karma can you show me where you saw this question?
@round isle its fine i got it
@proud gust I suggest you draw the shape again in the question and do some additional labeling
there is some stuff that is not indicated there
is SAS? @round isle
Do you know what SAS means??
Side angle side
Yeeeeep
its sas then
What do those lines mean on the triangles
idk
You don’t know
right triangles
Oh god
@round isle
god ur hand writting
sorry, I can't understand what you did
why don't you make labels accordingly. Label equal sides and angles accordingly because the question mentions isosceles triangle and equilateral triangle
make a bigger and upright triangle
@jagged sapphire the order of the letters matters
@jagged sapphire it is not ASA
How many pairs of sides of the triangles are congruent?
How many angles?
The drawing you’re given tells you everything
@round isle
@tough pilot 1 side and 1 angle
This?
Which side do you see is congruent @jagged sapphire
The Right Side
@round isle '
@round isle /
jm congruent
To what
Congruency is a relationship with another shape or line not a state of being on its own
So JM is congruent to LK
@round isle
Which angles are congruent to each other
m and k
And how do you know that
It’s a really simple answer
What tells you that they are congruent angles
the little circle thingy
Yes the angle line
Good so take note of the details in a picture like that from now on so that you can recognize that
The marks on JM and LK
The angle lines
Okay so now what is one last congruent pair
This will determine the answer
mk and kn
@proud gust what do you need help with?
Need help with part a only
@jagged sapphire now is that an angle pairing or a side pairing
side
What tells you that
@round isle this is what I have so far
thanks you taught me alot
@round isle
you literally drew the exact same thing as in the question
but i still don't know the answer 💀
did you not understand what I told you in the very beginning?
@jagged sapphire we’re getting there, stick with me
k
some information is still not mentioned in the drawing
And could you repost the picture
JM LK?
What’s was I supposed to draw, I’ve litterally been asking u but u don’t tell me, the reason I came here was for u to help me
You already have JM and LK
JN LN
dont spam ping
@jagged sapphire there is no proof of congruency there
XYZ is an equilateral triangle
I labeled 60* angles which means it is equilateral
@jagged sapphire there is no proof of congruency there
@tough pilot Ok?
okay
what do i do if theres no congruencey
Those two triangles share a side don’t they?
draw a straight line from W to Z
I did
Yes
this line will bisect the angle XZW
Wouldn’t that shared side be a sign of congruency?
should be pretty straightforward after that
Yea because its the same side
It’s not straight forward I’m still confused
so its SAS?
First there is the JM LK congruency, then there is the JMK LKM congruency, and then there is the shared side congruency, where MK=KM
Yes, but I hope you can carry on with similar problems without asking similar questions again
just plug in the values and solve for t
@upper karma Ye?
whats the formula for time?
simply solve for t by plugging all the numeric values into the equation d(t)
wait
let me check one thing first
the maximum height would be at half the total time the ball is in the air
Total time is distance between roots
Ignore beam
Yes, but I hope you can carry on with similar problems without asking similar questions again
@tough pilot
....
the total time is twice that
^
They might not know what a derivative is
can you give me the equal like write it down
keep in mind
now im confused again
really?
This is a trig chat room not a calculus one
^
hmmmmmmmmmmmm
Take a couple steps back
no
lol
@upper karma agree the time a ball is in the air is the time it takes to br thrown and for it to hit the ground?
Is it not telling you a way to simplify the equation right off the bat
Can you repost image
@upper karma
It’s saying g is equal to 32 ft/sec^2
Can’t you plug g into the original equation
I mean the number g is representing
ok
Yes and v0 aswell...
thanks guys
Then just find the roots
You’re just solving for t
Or dont plug it in and solve for t
And then plug in ur values
Useless to do that tho
me too
@sinful tide its homework
ah lol
bruh
u can use it during tests
they just said no exams
exams are at end of term
@sinful tide
@stark bolt 6. Do not ask for help on tests. Any violation of this will lead to appropriate action being taken at mod discretion.
why not tests?
You should already know it by the time of the test.
The test is to measure your knowledge without help.
@karmic cloak #discussion message
help
When it comes to understanding a general topic or rule, I’d recommend googling before anything @zenith garnet
@tough pilot I'm just not sure what general topic or rule I'm supposed to use in this:
in question (a)
for (a) there is technically not enough info to prove congruence but could you say there is because of the line and angle placement or no
when did i send that message lol
a while ago lool
i guess in general, i believe that by googling triangle congruency you could get somewhere
explaining these SAS, SSS, ASA proofs and stuff is kinda just like reteaching the subject itself
i mean yeah what @viscid garnet said for a)
i wouldn't really be able to infer much from just 2 congruencies
i wouldn't really be able to infer much from just 2 congruencies
@tough pilot same thats why im confused
@viscid garnet no i don't think you can just assume
that's a horrible link but it's for reviewing such things
i'm rusty on it all
ok thanks
All a matter of practice 👍🏽
@slender idol
Ye
The information that you have
@spark totem test question?
cya
Hi I am really confused and I've used a few trig identities but Idk how to do this, please can someone explain how to do this?
I'd use triangles on the place tbh
cosx = u means cos(u) = -sqrt(3)/4. -sqrt(3) is adjacent, 4 is hypotenuse
No, it's about finding tanx
oh yh true find tan X but like its not to do with triangles
I don't rly understand it
I think the first bit is a typo, should only be one cos
So let's say there's a right triangle with
cosθ = -√3 / 4
Mhm
That means adj can be √3
And hyp can be 4
By pythag, opp can be √[16 - 3] = √13
What's tanθ of this triangle?
opp/adj so inv tan root13 over root3?
But
Im not sure if the right angled triangle is right angled?
Im not sure if the right angled triangle is right angled?
@slim warren
Lmao *not sure if the triangle is right angled
it is
How?
you just make it right angled lol
Oh my god what am i missinggggggggggggg? So I have a circle sector which, when folded into a cone, the resulting cone has height 22 and the base circle has radius 8. I need to find r and theta in original circle sector. r is easy, I found it to be 23.41. But how do I get to theta? Can't find sector length without theta and can't find theta without sector length as far as I can see. Anyone?
exact answer
Calc won't give it in surd form
then draw it out 🙂
I have
can you send a picture of the triangle?
yeah
yeah
Ty mate
$\sqrt{\frac{13}{3}}$
moshill1:
oop, if anyone sees my thing from earlier, ignore it, i got it
can someone help me solve this? im not really sure where to start...
i know the equilateral triangle has angles of 60 degrees
thats p much all i can think of
pls help 😄
AEG = AED + DEG
given EG // AC, CDE and DEG are supplementary
and CDE is known
@zenith garnet
yes
how do u we know?
can somebody help me
@upper karma what do you think between those 2
If you know what the same-side interior angles theorem and what the alternate interior angles theorem is, then you should be able to know what the converse it actually is, and then select on of those 2
well i went with same side
im really really bad at math
@upper karma
And that's correct
oh ty
:)
If you are able to know this
If you know what the same-side interior angles theorem and what the alternate interior angles theorem is, then you should be able to know what the converse it actually is, and then select on of those 2
There's no more to it
Yw
i dont know that but i do know that usually alternate means that they wouldnt be close to eachother like that
It's all about knowing the theorems and what they mean, if you can, i suggest you to give a review to them
alright
thanks for your help
is it a test?
jeez bro I dont even know where to begin lmao
then you cant get help
rest in peace flavored soup
haha fr
if i knew i would tell you
so yall dont help on test just hw?
kk
Ayo can somebody help
Let line BD intersect line AC at point B, between point A and C. Perpendiculars from point A and C to line BD meet at points P and Q, respectively. Prove that point P and Q are not on the same side of line AC.
Two column proof
Pls help
@upper karma i think you gotta be using the parallel postulate axiom here
what does that do
it’s a mouthful, let me pull it up
k
historically the story of this axiom is actually really interesting
but if you look at the picture here, the axiom says that if alpha+beta < 180, then the two lines meet on that side of the line
yeah
so show <APB + <ABP < 180
then A is to the left
similarly argue C is to the right
k
oh wait sorry wrong points one sec
i think the angles that matter here are <PAB + <PBA. if that’s less then 180 then by the axiom the lines meet on the upper side of the line
and then similarly for the other point
So APB is 90
true
which means that the other two angles add up to 90
yeah and that’s less than 180 🙂
mhm
wait what were you thinking when I said that points p and q were not on the same side of line ac
so you want to prove that right?
I mean like what were you thinking I was trying to prove
I meant that one is above and the other is below or if you turn it one is to the left and one is to the right
yeah
so actually “same side of the line” is a bit of a weasel word here
you need to define what that actually means
here’s a definition: “P and Q are on the same side of the line AC if the line segment PQ does not intersect the line AC”
Idk not my words
and so “not on the same line” means “does intersect”
my teacher said this
ok
So I didnt know what to do so I drew that
it really boils down to what definitions and axioms your teacher gave you
yeah
this is actually a super subtle question lol
so yeah what axioms do you have?
is it just the 5 from elements by euclid or something else
we have some other things
But
Nothing really seems like it would be useful
mostly congruence stuff
is there an easy reference I can see?
also in my opinion, if “same side of the line” is not defined for you, this is a bad question
It isn't defined
you can’t do a rigorous 2 column proof without having that definition

