#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 324 of 1
@fresh pike segment
oh okay thx
can someone show me how to determine which angles are bigger than the others?
and on this one, how do i find out which one is the longer side?
The side just infront of largest angle is largest
infront?
what am i even looking at lmao
Here side c is infront of angle gamma
Ignore the other working
Just look at the traingle
so for this one how would i go on about solving it?
Well, you see angle GHJ is 90*
so the largest side would be HJ?
No
hmm
What's the side infront of Angle GHJ?
the lesson that taught me how to find the longest side was very vague and brief in its wording
what do you mean by infront?
Here side GJ is infront of angle GHJ
man i don't get what infront means lmao
down the drain*

Hello, I was doing my trigonometric problem that seemed easy at first then i eventually realized that I assumed that the hypotenuse of x and y legs is equal to the m. Is there a way to verify that the red triangles form an isosceles triangle?
i dont think they do
i'm sure there exist one or two people good with proofs in a server of thousands
is it a two-col proof question
,rccw
Any ideas?
😭
youll have to find someone else who doesnt have an aversion to them yet
Ur kinda speaking gibberish to me 😂
But its fine thank u for looking
Im sure someone will turn up
AF to FM to MC to CD
FM and MC are equal as M is the mid point
and since you know AF and CD are equal vectors, therefore AM is equal vectors to MD,
@rigid dove
because you start from M, and then you move from M to D, and that would require you going to MC then CD (which MC is equal to FM due to it being the mid point) and CD is equal to AF (as it is stated in the question)
so essentially, AM and MD is equal as essentially being added the same vectors from M
I prefer using a parabola
that would accuratly show all points that are twice as far from (0,0) than (6,0), but I ma not sure how to do that
do you know how I would go about calculating the parabola
how so?
Hello English isn't my first language; i can't find the meaning of 'a dashed ray' in contrary with just a ray.
Nvm. it's the form of the line; dotted, dashed, pointed etc.
what have you tried & where are you stuck
you tried the law of sines to get what
The oppsoite side of 460m
use the law of sines
Haha just wrote that i tried that
but i bet im doing something wrong
or putting the numbers in wrong places
thats what i need help with
lol
Well i removed it becouse it was wrong lol
can you redo it
Well here you have what i did lol
Thats why i asked here becouse i aint got no clue how to solve it
i am assuming b is the side you circled in blue
yep
you should have had sin(68)/460 = sin(71)/b
which would then give you b = 460sin(71)/sin(68)
and then the height of the triangle is just b sin(41)
the two sides will be equal since it is an isosceles triangle
@round isle is it answer to my question?
The lengths of two legs of an isosceles triangle are represented by the expressions (3x - 7) and (x + 5).
The perimeter of the triangle is 40cm.
Find the length of the base of the triangle.
Do NOT label your answer.
@!! リℸ ̣ 𝙹リℸ ̣ ⍑ᒷℸ ̣ ∷ᔑᓵꖌ#0001 is it answer to me?
if all those expressions matched the setup in your question then probably
oh misread the actual quote
the two sides will be equal since it is an isosceles triangle
yes that is aimed to help you with that question
how do we know it is isosceles
because you are told that it is
the first line in the question
The lengths of two legs of an isosceles triangle are represented by the expressions (3x - 7) and (x + 5).
pi < x < 3pi/2 and 3sinx-5cosx = 0
cos^2.x - sin^2.x = ?
what are those dots?
How do I prove (secθ-1)(secθ+1) = tan²θ?
Here's the best I could do:
Subtract Fractions: (1-cosθ/cosθ)(1+cosθ/cosθ) = tan²θ
Multiply Fractions: 1-cos²θ/cos²θ = tan²θ```
I need to get sinθ in the mix somehow
@fiery sundial start with (1/cosθ - 1)(1/cosθ +1), put everything to the same denominator, and multiply
Never say (1/cosθ - 1)(1/cosθ +1) =tan^2(θ) to start your reasoning : it is true so the only answer you can find following this method is.. 1=1
you're missing parentheses in multiply places
also this depends on what you;re allowed to use
do you know your pythagorean trig identites?
they're used in the vast majority of these proofs
I see that I can replace cos²θ with 1-sin²θ though
that is one option
but doesn't really help that much
what else can you get from that identiy
Oh!
sin²θ = 1-cos²θ
Which is something I have
And that brings me to my answer
Thanks a bunch!
also note that you could also expand the intial expression directly
to get sec^2(theta) - 1
which is tan^2(theta)
(from another pythagorean trig identity)
do tangency to the circle + similarity of triangles questions belong here
yes they do, alternatively use a free channel under math-help
a list? not that i'm aware of
they should be in your book on in notes your teacher should've given you
or you can find a convenient summary of them online
tangency of the circle belonged to the curriculum of last year which got cancelled
there are some left over questions about that in the new book so
ok. look up some circle geo guides online.
you should also familiarise yourself with terms like chord,secants etc.
here you'd want to relate the tangent AB and secant AC,
which could by done by applying the conveniently named tangent-secant theorem
would the euclidean theorem formula work in this situation
nevermind i got it
used euclidean
did (AB)² = AD × AC
How do I do G
It is in an orthonormal axis system
And btw how do I know if a vector or vectors are standardized
Exercise 2a
to standardize a vector you are gonna wanna multiply by the vector by a scalar consisting of 1/|v|
so just divide each component by the magnitude of the entire vector
@sharp plume
What have you tried so far
um
im not sure if this is right but
i did 180-72 = 108
so is it 108?
@upper karma
No
But okay
Let's start by the upper triangle
What properties does a isosceles triangle angle-wise?
ie what can we conclude about the angles on a isosceles triangle
ok
sorry
um
2 sides are equal
so two of the angles have to be the same
@upper karma
is anyone else here to help me?
yeah, angles opposite equal sides are equal
is anyone else here to help me?
Are you srs? If you take 5 minutes to answer it's okay but if i take 4 you complain
jeez
i wasnt trying to be harsh
Be patient is what i mean, i can't stand there 5 minutes sometimes waiting, for then to answer inmediately
Anyways
ok sorry
The opposite angles of the equivalent sides are equivalent
Would you be able to point where the other 72° angle would be at?
(in the upper triangle)
would it be 36?
,calc 180-(72+72)
Result:
36
Yes
And now we move to the lower triangle
If we know that the big angle is 90° (because of the square), and we know that one part of the angle is 36, what would the other part of the angle be equal to?
180 - 126 = 54
The one at the middle right (with a square on it)
yeah
@west basin can u explain how to do
What do we know about the angle BCP
(considering we know that it is an isosceles triangle)
that one of the angles is 54 and that 2 of the sides are equal
Yeah i mean
We know it is isosceles, hence 2 angles are going to be equivalent as the previous triangle
Which 2 angles are gonna be equal on this triangle
That's not how you name angles, B and C are points
But either way, i know what you mean and no
Oh BC
ok i can give a short example if you had a vector like v = (1,2,3) you would calculate the magnitude, |v| = sqrt(14) then divide each component by the magnitude so v_n = (1/sqrt(14), 2/sqrt(14), 3/sqrt(14))
@sharp plume
CBP is an angle, PCB is another angle and BPC another
The letter at the middle, for example at PCB, C is the point where that angle is located
ohhh i seee now
ok
Okay but look at this
what about AB, A(1/2,o,o) and B(0,1/2,sqrt(2)/2) @west basin
do i have to multiply A and B
yes
@lament shell if you look at this pic, remember that the opposite angles are equal
Do you see how i know now that PCB and BPC are equivalent?
umm
umm what
well arent they just a diffrent order of the same angle?
You read it wrong
The letter at the middle, for example at PCB, C is the point where that angle is located
Always remember this
Pinpoint your confusion
technically you ppl have been talking about the same triangle this whole time
angles have hats on 
This is how we name angles
The letter in the middle is going to indicate the point where it is located
You can also think of it this way
The angle PCB, is the angle that forms PC and CB
i think im getting confused cuz i think we are still solving for x but we arent right?
We are indeed
But i had to name the angles in a way it could be understood
Instead of saying: "the angle at the top" "the angle in the middle left below the triangle", etc
Which is obviously worse
Okay if this system is confusing you, let's just name angles to a letter
Would you be more comfortable with that? @lament shell
yeah
Missing ° but anyways
Forget about the letters naming and all that
Do you understand why we can say now that the angle y is equal to 54°
just because its on the oppsite side?
Yes
but isnt y opposite x?
Wdym?
is the green line shows the opposite or is the orange one the line
The greenish line is just me showing which side it is opposite to y
The orange line is just me showing which side it is opposite to the 54°
wait so is x the only one thats not equal because both its sides are equivalent?
I mean yeah, x is not the opposite of any of the equal sides
Angles y and 54° are opposite to the sides that are equal (because of the | mark)
So y is the angle that is equal to 54, so we can just do this
Hold up
Now do you know how we can finally find x
180-(54+54)
72
Yup
Alright thank you
Yw
yeah
@upper karma use the fact that radius of this circle (distance between origin and point P) is unity.
Is cot positive in quadrant 2?
Yes!
You figured it out. Congratulations
Convert the given equation in the form expression in the question
ramonov:
will be part of the process
they want an equation in the form:
something squared = something
yes
hi
what does cos(wt-kz) when it becomes an exponential?
e^(wt-kz)
or e^(wt-jkz)?
are you talking about complex exponentials?
hi can i have help
yes
solve each equation for the function... Problem = x^4-10x^2+9=0
can someone help me with that
Use substitution t = x^2
Then u got a quadratic equation which u can solve
U will get 2 solutions t_1, t_2 which each have 2 solutions for x because t=x^2
@upper karma
@polar whale didnt follow the first part
ok
Then what do you get ?
I Could Use Some Help, Heres An Example Of What Level/Type Of Math I'm Doing
What do you need help with?
I Don't Understand How To Determine If It's SSS AAS ASA Or SAS
how do i figure out which is greater
or which is lesser
oh shoot, someone already posted something before me woops
What does tour intuition tells you? @fresh pike
at first i thought it was AB < De, but i think that's wrong
It is correct
Both sides are same. If the angle between them is more, that means other side is more
i might look back on the other lessons and post it here to ask for help
Oh yeah i see now
but there was other ones were I applied the same thing i did for this one, but it was wrong
You can share these problems as well
def will later
Yeah I Know What They Stand For But Nothing Else Really
So SSS would mean three sides of a triangle is equal to a different pair of sides of a different triangle
SAS would mean that two sides and angle made by those two sides is equal
And so on. @upper karma
oh yes for this one
how would you find the answer for this one?
im sure it's easy, but I guess i missed out on something
Do you know sine rule?
Nope, could you explain?
Fir any triangle ABC, a/sinA = b/sinB = c/sinC
Here sides are defined BC =a, AC = b, AB =c
@spark star
how do i determine which angles are the specified angle names
yes it does
Can you explain?
Here, A= 20 degrees, B = 110 degrees @fresh pike
They are congruent.
explain what?
they're congruent
Yeah.
it's F pattern iirc
Here, A= 20 degrees, B = 110 degrees @fresh pike
@slender nacelle Okay im following
2x-6=3x-20
yeah
x=-14
no
x=14
yeah
So if you use a/sinA = c/sinC @fresh pike
You’ll get a/c = sinA/sinC =sin 20/sin 50 <1
So a<c
most drawings/diagrams arent to scale
yeah

The drawing is confusing.
Sorry we have to compare b amd c
That's why you trust the math, the drawing is to aid @spark star
what do those "/" represent?
Division
wuh we divide,
i might just look up some khan academy videos
and try to apply your words to the videos and see if it helps
Law of Sines: $\frac{\sin{A}}{a}=\frac{\sin{B}}{b}=\frac{\sin{C}}{c}$
thanks anyways 👍
Sure, you’re welcome
moshill1:
wtf do i do if its like
56π
cuz like
it ype 56 in my calculator then hit π
and it only shows me pi
moshill1:
@slender nacelle ur the only active person i see
I think you have to multiply it by pi and press =
ye thats what i thought
but like
my work says
"dont type 3.14 unless told to, just the π button on ur calculator"
and im like bruh
pie is 3.14 
well i mean its more than that
but bruh
Pi is not 3.14
Yes you will get more accurate results if you use more digits
it was wrong, I just need to figure out why
So b > c or AC > AB
@slender nacelle @fresh pike
wait so is pi just never ending?
thats pretty poggers i guess
It is what it is lol
@fresh pike size of a side is dependent on the opposite interior angle, longest side of a triangle is always opposite the largest interior angle
use law of sines
So I don’t ever remember having a problem like this one
is anyone free
draw a line from center of circle to D and C
i need help with a question
then draw a line from center of circle to A and B
sorry not C but the other side where the triangle is tangent to the circle
wait could i quickly ask a question @round isle
how do you do this?
use this @fair marten
you could use the formula for arg
formula for arg is tan y/x tho
i havent learnt arctan yet
what do you mean you haven't learnt arctan?
can i send u my teachers working
it's the inverse of tan
what do you mean you haven't learnt arctan?
@round isle in the UK, we dont learn it till later
meaning its doable without it
you know about sin, cos, tan but you don't know their inverse?
right
if it helps i have some working out
so did your teacher show you how to do this by using exponentials?
Hm?
(2x-12)+(3x-8) =180
They are congruent.
because a straight line = 180 degrees
can someone step this out with me
did u not use the formula?..
can we call admin to report someone for spam
i don't get the formula
@fair marten do not spam
i don't get the formula
@fair marten ok, have a read on bbc bitesize about the sine rule and how to use it
for a start
this is so bizarre @hollow haven
lol
alright
I'm sure you can't add to 180@hollow haven
i have no clue what my teacher do
I don't recall the geometric method for solving this
Correct me if I'm wrong
thing is i havent really looked into congruent triangles in my school in uk
probably because I never used it after finding out about atan
@round isle try it with atan and see if the answer is the same
I mean, atan is literally just the inverse of tan. You take the tan of an angle and you take atan of the ratio of sides that define the tan
try it, it's very simple
ok will do cheers
try it
I mean, atan is literally just the inverse of tan. You take the tan of an angle and you take atan of the ratio of sides that define the tan
@round isle if u are still interested, its just trig LMAO
so 180-116
@fair marten assuming u put the angles and side lengths into the equations, probably. 64 sounds correct
could someone help me with this question?
"A construction engineer determines that a straight road must rise vertically 45 m over a 250 m distance measure along the surface of the road (the straight road represents the hypotenuse of the right triangle). Calculate the angle of elevation of the road."
I just can't for the life of me figure out how to draw the triangle for that
I don't understand what it's asking me
it is a right angle triangle I know that much
csn someone help me witha question
@fathom root if your available
\cot\theta>0 \text{ and } (\tan\theta)(\sin\theta)<0
cotθ>0 and (tanθ)(sinθ)<0
o woops
Do you know which length would measure up to 9.3, other than what is mentioned in the figure?
Do you know which length would measure up to 9.3, other than what is mentioned in the figure?
@slender nacelle I received help, thank you though!
Does anybody know if the shadow would be the hypotenuse or the adjacent? I can't figure it out
"A communication tower casts a shadow of 55 m when the sun is at an angle of elevation of 72°. What is the height of the tower to the nearest metre? Include a diagram in your solution."
also thank you @fathom root for earlier
big help
adjacent
yes
ok
exactly so
I don't know how that works
you dont know how to draw?
if the angle is the sun and it's facing up at the tower then how does it make a shadow
nonono
I can draw
just what I said above
sorry network lag
Z pattern
how about this
its not the sun facing up lol
either way
damn idk how to explain this
1 second
ok
I appreciate it though
even if I can't understand it knowing that the shadow would be the adjacent is good enough for me
thank you @humble pulsar
that's not the best mentality imo
right?
so whats confusing
even if I can't understand it knowing that the shadow would be the adjacent is good enough for me
@untold peak im sure i could help you understand the entirety of the problem-
well I did end up solving it
I'm not sure if it's right so here
excuse my handwriting for being awful
@zenith anchor @humble pulsar
right sorry
teacher doesn't care about that tho
if the number you get is right he won't care
the thing that does bug me is he doesn't know computers too well and he'll get us to take pics of our work on paper and upload it
and technically $55\tan{72^{\circ}} \approx 169.29$
thank you
moshill1:
if the angle is the sun and it's facing up at the tower then how does it make a shadow
@untold peak i just thought this was funny
169.27*
purely because i thought the same exact thing
when i was first learning trig application problems
thank god this is almost the last of it
I've been working on re teaching myself trig all day because I can't withhold math info very well
I made a whole google doc on trig and stuff like that
also how did you get 169.27 @humble pulsar ?
plugged in 55tan(72)
that's exactly what I did
how did I not get that
no u right
I did get it wrong
I rounded up the fourth number after the decimal
that's how that happened
can i have help
@civic crown @upper minnow help for what. Write the problem.
this
“The measure of one acute angle of a right triangle is 6 less than twice the measure of the other acute angle. Find the measure of each acute angle.”
yeah
can i see it
what did you get and how?
also, normally angle measures are written inside the angle.
what do you mean by "x1" and "x2"
you should have had a linear equation with one solution only
So this question is it asking for “angle one is less than 90 degrees” or does it want the actual degree
which question? 8 or 9?
also you do realize that saying "the actual degree" to refer to the size of an angle is like saying "the actual foot" to refer to a length, right
in either case, in both questions the size of angle 1 can be known exactly - and that's what the problem expects of you.
8, i mean like does it want a specific degree or does it want me to say “ angle one is equal to 90”
But u pretty much cleared it so thanks 🙏
what do you mean by "a specific degree"?
Like “angle 1 is 78 degrees”
Assuming the one side of angle of angle 1 is a diameter, it is given that angle 1 is a right angle
i fail to see how 78 is "specific" but 90 is not
in question 8, angle 1 is 90 degrees.
I need help with a trig proof
Ok, sorry im not making sense im not good at descriptions. But i mean would it want me to say “angle 1 is less than 90 degrees” or “angle 1 is 77 degrees”
Again im really sorry
In a triangle ABC, where a, b, c are the opposite sides of angle A, B, and C respectively, and angle A is 60 degrees, A segment AD bisects angle A. Point D lies on BC. Prove that AD = sqrt(3)*bc/(b+c)
did you miss some parentheses
can you show your diagram
You mean the one I drew?
Yeah but I meant it like an example
Oh
The 77 and 78
I guess I understand
Sorry
my current instinct is to maybe use law of cosines on ABD, ACD and ABC
this may get ugly but it might just get the job done?
not sure
Can sb explain to me why the functional expression of half circle is $sqrt(r^2-x^2)$? (Given that the center of the circle is (0;0))
BennyPenny:
does anyone understand this?
At x=r and x=-r, y is 0
@upper karma is that for someone else or me?
For someone else
But the angle sum theorem states that a triangle’s exterior angles add up to 180
*interior
so should i state that as the answer?
Don’t state that as the answer
cos i’m just confused on what i should on the question
Use the definition of a linear pair and alternate interior angles
how can i explain that in a form of an answer? cos i can’t just write that correct ?
So do you want me to answer the question for you?
if possible that can be great but if your busy or just don’t feel like it that’s fine too
I’ll write a proof but it’s likely the theorems they ask you to use differ from what I know so you’ll have to fill in the reasons yourself
alright that’s great too
Lines AB and CB are parallel. Angle CAD is congruent to angle ACB by the definition of alternate interior angles. Likewise, angle CBA is congruent to angle BAG
Angle BAC plus angle BAG plus angle CAD equals 180 by the definition of a linear pair
thank you so much man
Through substitution, angle BAC plus angle CBA plus angle ACB
i really appreciate it
Anyone know how I can do this?
don't know if this suits you, but a direct solution can be find through integrating
Take the point where the three circles intersect as the origin and pass a vertical straight line through it which passes through the centre of A that will be the y axis
Is there a way this can be done without calculus? @plain wyvern
Ah! I just said that in passing. You don't need integration for this at all, it's pointless
don't mind that
as for the other way, first find the white area b/w the semi-circle and circle, you can make a triangle from the centre of B and then subtract it from area of a quadrant, you get half the white area. I think you can do after that
https://i.imgur.com/aqjxDuw.png Subtract area of triangle ADE from the area of sector ADE. That gives you half the area of the white bit.
OHH Thanks
Anyone here
wanna help me with some area?
My teacher gave me this
Said solve the area of this
and i have zero i mean zero clue how to do this
https://i.imgur.com/vhTke4M.png AC is given to be 9. And OC is the radius and so is OB. You can use trigonometry in triangle BOA to find the angle BOC and then the area of the sector OBC. Of course all this is assuming the arc CB of the extra bit is part of the same circle as the figure seems to suggest.
Okay thanks il try
I Don't Understand triangle congruence At All Can Someone Help Please
is there a problem rn that you're stuck on?
Yes
ok, can i see?
All I Don't Understand This
ok so
YEs
they share that side
On D
fallen i would appreciate not being interrupted
okay so @upper karma before we start these problems, do you know what it means for two triangles to be congruent in general?
I Think It Means For Them To Be The Same
is there any reason why you're Capitalizing Every Single Word by the way
No Just A Habit
there are a few rules for triangles specifically which let you conclude the congruence of two triangles from the fact that certain combinations of their elements match up
(i say "element" here to mean a side length or an angle measure)
the abbreviations are a concise description of the matching elements:
for example, if you have two triangles with three pairs of matching side lengths between them, you know they're congruent.
SSS means Side-Side-Side, which denotes the "three sides matching" i just talked about.
SAS means Side-Angle-Side, or in other words two sides and an angle between them
ASA means Angle-Side-Angle, two angles and a side between them
AAS means Angle-Angle-Side, or two angles and a side not between them
does that all make sense to you?
Kinda
ok which part does not make sense
there are two ways a pair of elements in two triangles can be matched: they can be marked as equal (with hatch marks, like sides ZW and ZS in exercise a) or they can be the same element actually common to both triangles (such as side BD in exercise c)
for example, in exercise a, looking at the diagram you see this: ZW = ZS (marked), DW = DS (marked), ZD = ZD (shared)
three matching sides
therefore the triangles can be proven congruent by SSS
Wait Isn't ZD An Angle?
Wait How Are They Specified Then?
OHHHHHH
THE LINES HAVE ALMOST NOTHING TO DO WITH ANGLES
three points usually
or one point, if the point in question only has one obviously-drawn angle originating at it
yeah thats correct
yeah thats correct
Ok So Can We Move On To B @dark sparrow
sure
ty
in part b we have one pair of marked matching sides and one shared side
nothing else, really, no matter how the diagram may appear
two elements isn't enough to conclude congruence
so we can't prove these triangles congruent just from the info it gives us
yeah thats correct
yeah i guess it's impossible for two elements to be shared
keep in mind though that just because there's more than one mark doesn't automatically mean you have congruence
no, the shared side is not between the matching angles
Explain If You Could?
So To Be ASA There Can't Be A Shared Side
Sorry
you should go re-read and understand what i have said about these congruence rules
Alright
this person left the server just now ^


honestly better for me cause their nick is a pain
tspdsld what is this even supposed to mean
true how do you even ping them
noob
The Answer Is Not Congruient Right
What does the question ask for?
Cna you post the entire problem
Because B is clear but A is not
Ignore What I Put In It's What I Think The Answers Are
For A You Have To Put If It's SSS ASA AAS Etc
consider some basic geo properties
10 and 12 are wrong
I See What I Did Wrong For 10 What's Wrong With 12
consider some basic geo properties
you can deduce some additional info from the diagram
yes
And Then It's The Same Thing For 10
yes
Thank You SO Much
I was given the information in green and had to find the yellow arc RT. I said it was 40 degrees because of Thales's theorem but that was wrong. I did 180-90-50 which gave me 40.
angle RTS is 90 given Thales's theorem
arcRT would have the same measure as the central angle it subtends
(NOT the angle at the circumference which you found to be 40°)
got you
but how would you find the central angle given the information
all you know is the 50 degrees
angle chasing
Thales theorem in combo with inscribed angle
after getting <RST, getting <ROT is just 1 step away
I think i can do it but differently then how you said
<R0T = 80 because <0RT and <RT0 = 50
there can be multiple routes to reach the solution
so arc RT = 80
yes that will work too
but continue how you would do it because im not following that
look up inscribed angle theorem
<ABC = 1/2 arc AC
(where B is at the circumference)
hence arcAC is 2<ABC,
or in your case:
arcRT = 2 <RST = 2*40°
I mentioned this route because you had already found the angle at the circumference
and was to address you were stating the wrong measure
but yeh, isosceles triangle is quite efficient
I got it now, thank you
anyone know how to do this?
yes
can you tell me how please?
did you try anything yet?
not really i got c = -14? we never really did this stuff
how are you getting c= -14,
also what is your c supposed to represent?
there's a difference between c and C,
also your setup is nonsensical
it's seems like you're trying to equate <C to 0 for some reason
you should be applying the angle sum of a triangle
and solve for x
so how do i do that?
what's the sum of the angles in a triangle?
180
° and what are the sizes of your 3 sngles
so to get X i would combine the X's combine the whole numbers and take away the whole number from 180 and divide by the X's right?
idk the sides of the 3 angles
m<A= 9x-7
you are given the measures and sizes of all 3 angles in terms of x
their sum is 180°
yes
so how do i find sides from angles?
you do t have to explicitly find the sides
don't
longer sides will be opposite larger angles
eg if A is the largest angle in the triangle, side a or BC will be the longest side
can someone help me i have the problem 3 +- sqaure root of 115 all divided by 2 how do i get my roots for a graph from that
what's $\frac{3\pm\sqrt{115}}{2}$ supposed to be?
ramonov:
do you have the exact wording of the problem?
well here ill show you the whole problem i solved it down to there give me a sec
can you help me with this when your done helping synx please?
Solve each equation by using the quadratic formula. the problem is t^2-3t-28=0 and i used the formula -b-4ac to get there
my teacher said to use b^2-4ac sorry wrote it wrong
still not a formula
that actually resembles a formula (ignoring the horrid typesetting)
in your case:
$\red{ t = } \frac{ 3 \pm \sqrt{9+4\cdot 28}}{2}$
ramonov:
the thing under the square root isn't 115 either
yup just relized i did it wrong but the 9 is -9
but that expression you reached as the t indicates represent the roots for that equation
ok so i just neeed so simplify it correct?
yes
Synx.is.a.qt:
so thats what i get
how are you getting 106
oh wait hold on that was the wrong one
it should be odd
hold on give me one sec
$\frac{3\pm\sqrt{121}}{2}$
thats what is should be if im not wrong
**t = **
yes
Synx.is.a.qt:
yes
Synx.is.a.qt:
so in the answer key my teacher gets t=7 and t=-4 how does she simplify from there to get those
btw thank you so much for helping me
$t = \frac{3 \pm 11}{2}$ indicates: \
$t = \frac{3 + 11}{2}$ or $t = \frac{3 - 11}{2}$
ramonov:
justify / give reasoning for each statement on the left
Oof that shouldve been an obvious observation. Thank you
Can someone tel me my error
The answers is 121 with 2 real roots and the 2 points are -3/2 and 1/3
..
In quadratic equations, you assign the letter A to the variable with the highest power
And typically equations are written with the highest power in front and then the second-highest and so on
Ya but a is correct the highest value is 3
The highest power
Oh
Which in this case would be m^2
So that would be -6^2
And then how about B and C then
?
I do not know
Ok
If you’re asking for how to obtain $\frac{3\pm 11{2}$
Second Mikey:
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for details. (You may edit your message)
