#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 306 of 1
yes
why
again why not just say "no i don't know how to find the distance between two points"
are you afraid i'll bite you
the distance between two points can be calculated as $$d = \sqrt{\Delta x^2 + \Delta y^2}$$ where $\Delta x$ and $\Delta y$ are the differences in the $x$ (resp. $y$) coordinates of your points
Ann:
why would you have x^2 in a square root
it's not x^2, it's (Δx)^2
do the words "pythagorean theorem" ring any bells at all to you?
because this is just the pythagorean theorem in a slightly different form
yes a^2 + b^2 = c^2
great, your legs are Δx and Δy, and your hypotenuse is d
So that will become d^2=Δx^2+Δy^2 (Pythagoras Theorem)
=> d=sqroot(Δx^2+Δy^2)
um hello
i have a strange geo question
im workin on this for 3 days but still i havent solved it
i really need help
it asks the alpha
Can you please write the question in English?
yea ABC is a triangle
and
AB+BK=AC
and the angle of BAK is 30 degrees and BKA is 70 degrees
its asking for alpha angle
Rotating ABK over B seems a good idea
umm how?
if its possible could you draw it?
,rotate
Now AK'C is isosceles
I rotated ABK around B, 100 degrees
Such that AK is a line
if you moved how did you move the alpha
Alpha is still there
whats the next step then?
Idk
It looked a good idea tho
yea
but it should continue
lol
If K', A, and C were collinear, it would be awesome
cant we use the Z rule
with A C K' A'
What?
just tryin to move the angles lol
your way looks so good but
i cant continue
thanks for the idea
I tried
Try rotating something else
Or reflecting
you could also apply sine law and sum-prod identities
alpha=30
@acoustic jungle how
I bashed it, I'm looking for another solution rn.
if you refer to HOBO's picture, and extend K to meet K'C at W. and prove that K'W=WC, then it can be proven.
but I can't seem to find a way.
you can also prove it if you get AWK'=90.
Hey
Can anyone tell me what's the answer?
I'm stuck between A and B
Everyone tells me sth different
,w calculate √((130-118)^2+(210-151)^2)
Your answer is B
I thought it was B too, but in the answer key and my teacher, they said that I find the hypotenuse of the big triangle and then the hypotenuse of the small one then I subtract
The answer key also said that
This would give us A
I did it like this
But apparently it's wrong
Maybe because they asked what's the minimum?
Idek
To me it looks like a pretty simple coordinate geometry problem,
Maybe I'm missing something
@dark sparrow could you check this,
I can't seem to find my mistake
the minimum is the straight line distance
That's what I did and I'm getting 60.2
Ann could u try to do it plz
the correct answer is 60.2
your teacher's method can be shown to be obviously absurd if we replace the points with say (400, 0) and (0, 300)
the straight line distance is obviously 500 miles but your teacher's method would give 100
which is BS
@dark sparrow no that's not her method
She said 2 right triangle would be formed
The hypotenuse of the big one- the hypotenuse of the small one would give us the distance
Idk if that's right tho
it isn't
you're basically trying to find the distance by computing the distance from each point to (0,0) and then subtracting those
this is less than or equal to the straight-line distance
like it's possible to get D_0 (the teacher's answer) to near zero while still keeping D_1 (the correct answer) pretty big
yes?
A polygon is inscribed in a circle. If some diameter of the circle divides the polygon into two regions of equal area, which of the following must be true:
1- the polygon is regular
2- the center of the circle is inside the polygon
3- the polygon is symmetrical about some diameter
The answer choices are :
A. none
B. 1 only
C. 2 only
D. 3 only
E. 2 and 3
First of all, the second choice is definitely yes
Yeah
Because the diameter won't pass through the polygon let alone divide it equally if the center of the circle isn't inside the polygon
Wait
What if it's like this
Yes, you are right
So this disproves the second choice is definitely correct
Hmm does 3 always have to be true
It doesn't... right?
I don't think it always has to be right
Because what if the triangle didnt have equal sides
It cut it in half
It wouldn't be symmetrical
Right?
Yes
Now I am sure, the third one doesn't always have to be true
Wait but if it cut it into 2 regions of equal area, does it mean that both have the same side measures?
Wait let me give a visual representation
so far, we know that the second option must not always be true
so you can exclude that out
Yeah
and for the third option
let's take a right angled triangle
And also the first option isnt always true
it's very rough but you get the idea
Yeah lol
it doesnt have to be symmetrical but can still be divided into equal areas by a straight line
Oh so the answer is none
yes
Thanks!
Welcome 😄
would this be false? I was thinking it was false but I have doubts
no it's not a point
I said i thought it's false
It is false indeed
@fresh pike you still need help?
nah I figured it out after re reading some stuff
If I understand what you are asking, can you take the coordinates of each of the vertices and multiply them by two to get the vertices of the new triangle and draw it like that?
you're welcome
Hi , I wanted to ask why is it if i have tan-1(2+sqroot(3)) = 75degrees in the first quadrant
for example
the other answer is -105 in the third quadrant or -180 degrees + 75 = -105
because tan's period is 180.
by the way, -180 +75 is the same thing as 180+75.
(for unit circle)
so i am loking at this image, is this the way to analyse it for sin cos tan inverse
where arcsin answers are in first and second quadrant
arctan are in first and third quadrants
arccos are in first and fourth quadrants
for a positive initial angle
arctan isn't a multivalued function
arctan(2+sqroot(3)) only has 1 value and that is 75° (or 5pi/12 radians)
however the solutions to tan(x) = 2+sqrt(3)
are x = k*180° + 75°
take for example this question
so there are 2 answers for arcsin, one of which is in first quadrant, second answer is in second quadrant
bad wording.
there are two values for theta
arcsin(w/R) gives the angle in the first quadrant
pi - arcsin(w/R) gives the angle in the second quadrant
so there are 2 answers from this question?
depending on context there may be more
so these are just 2 of the possible values (within 0 to 360 degrees)
outside of 0-360 degrees there may be more possible values?
within 0 to 360° yes
Got it, thanks!
so ik i have to memorise the first row for exams, but would it be worth the time to memorise the 2, 3 & 4 rows?
learn the periodic/phase shifts and/or compound angles and derive as needed
the top row is pretty much the complementary nature of sine and cosine
and tan and cot
learn the periodic/phase shifts and/or compound angles and derive as needed
@silent plank sorry what are periodic/phase shifts? - is it referring to the symmetry of the circles, so when you reflect along a certain line you get its complementary?
are periodic/phase shifts this?
sorry, i'm really bad with terminology fkjhkjh
pretty much
eg adding pi to the arguement gets you in the opposite quadrant and the sign may change depending on the trig function
ohhhh okk, so once you know the periodic shifts theres no point memorising the table above?
odd/eveness helps too
yeh, no point
same with the unit circle
just need to know the first quadrant
and derive the rest as needed
(using reference / related acute angles)
oooo ok thank you for the tips
which reduces it to learning around 5 key ideas
instead of a whole page of formulae/identties/values
yeaa it makes it a lot easier to remember now,,, i'll make sure to be confident with it before my exam
I find many people become nervous and obsessed with memorization
When if they learn the content the content that needs to be memorized becomes naturally understood and intuitive
What have you tried so far
oh wait,,,, i forgot root3/3 = 1/root 3 🗿
nvm ik how to do it now
but hypothetically if it didn't correspond with an exact value, is there a method to do by hand?
@long totem arctan!
or by noticing that value is near some known and can be represented as tan of some sum
MeIsNotGoodAtMath:
it doesnt bruh
well obviously in this special case, but in general it doesnt hold
What
idk
if it is a unit circle, then yes
so u cant just assume the radius for no reason
most likely it is a unit circle, otherwise the question is impossible
yeah then the radius = 1
if its a unit circle, r is defined to be 1
ohh makes sense
how come the period changes when n =/= 1? n as in nx
the period doesn't change
the domain does
if x runs from 0 to 2pi
does it not make sense that 2x would run from 2*0 to 2*2pi??
oHHH, sorry for the dumb question heheh,,,
why are they subtracting pi/6 instead of 5pi/6?
Al𝟛dium:
i'm so sorry for troubling you with such trivial question o.O
no i didn't mean that
hhhhh i don't think my brain's working anymore
i was just confused about what you were saying
no no,, like i know the question idek why i was confused,,,,
wdym?
an interval is just the 2 points in which the function goes through is it not?
i believe the interval for that function would be for -1<=x<=5
Sorry I meant midpoint
oh okay
oHh
it is trivial
do you know what the variables mean and how to use them to get the problem?
it is trivial
ugh again?
No I don’t understand the variables
may i repeat that saying "this is trivial" doesn't help at tall him to solve plus no one cares?
No I don’t understand the variables
okay
so $x_1$ and $x_2$ represent the x-coordinate of points A and B respectively while $y_1$ and $y_2$ represent the y-coordinate of points A and B respectively
Al𝟛dium:
maybe you understand the formula better this way:
Yes I do
Al𝟛dium:
Yes this makes much more sense now thanks
how do you find an equation for this
for what
Try graphing the points
ok
there are many forms for the equation of a straight line.
i have graphed the points
one thing you might find useful to know about a line is its slope.
or gradient, if you're from the UK
so you just find its rise/run
i'm not saying "so you do this". i try not to do that
i'm merely suggesting that you do it.
i understand
Sorry, this is a dumb question, but if I have some angle ABC, is there a name of the "connection" of the two lines of the angle, in this case, the point B
well yeah, but I mean more generalized
like is there a mathematical name for the kind of point that B is
what do u mean kind of point
like if I have some arbitrary angle
is there a term for the point that is in the middle
middle of what
the middle of the angle
like AB is a line
and BC is a line
is there a "name" for the type of point that B is
sort of like how the term for the side opposite a right angle is always the hypotenuse
the line is called the angle bisector
well obviously it depends on the point
some points have names
sorry, I don't think I'm explaining this well
oh I'm dumb
I couldn't remember the word vertex
I understand what you are trying to say @golden oxide
As far as I know, there is no standard mathematical name for such a vertex, you can just refer to it as it is labeled for eg. (B)
you can say vertex of <ABC
that isnt what he meant he just forgot what a vertex was, however i have no idea what he was talking about
oh lol
mmm geometry i remember this as if it was 10 years ago anyone need help
can someone explain to me what the heck this means?
the explanation is kinda duckery to me
r/explainlikeimfive
@fresh pike What part confuses you
AB+BC=AC is true, where AB, BC, and AC are the distances between points A and B, B and C, and A and C, respectively
like where did AB+BC=AC come from?????
and what does it mean by AB, BC, and AC are the distances between points A and B, B and C, and A and C, respectively
it might be a stupid question because all I have to do is read it but i just simply dont understand what im reading
like where did AB+BC=AC come from?????
@fresh pike this is kind of like saying 4 + 5 = 9
and what does it mean by AB, BC, and AC are the distances between points A and B, B and C, and A and C, respectively
@fresh pike It just means that its not going somewhere else or curves
Try and visualise it
If points A B and C were points on a line
and B was the point inbetween A and C
logically AB + BC = AC
ABC is the name of the line
Its easier to say AC
Since you know that B is inbetween
Imagine saying
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPKQRSTUVWXYZ instead of AZ
@fresh pike
anyone know why these aren't correct?
im new to trig and the video for the section wasnt really helpful sorry
i mean you used the pythagorean identity to get cos(theta) right?
yeah
note that both cos(theta)=4/5 and cos(theta)=-4/5
fulfill the pythagorean identity there
and you're given cos(theta)<0
(if you dont know how i got cos(theta)=-4/5 pls ask)
and since 4/5>0
it can't be that
so it must be -4/5
how do u get the negative
$(\frac35)^2+\cos^2(\theta)=1$
Sneaky:
$\cos^2(\theta)=\frac{16}{25}$
Sneaky:
give me a bit im in league game
youre fine take your time ty for helping me in the first place
now im gonna go on a weird tangent here and ask you what you would answer if i asked you to solve $x^2=4$
Sneaky:
you sure thats the only solution?
so you get how -4/5 is right now?
can a plane only contain 2 points?
if so why can't it contain 3 collinear points?
how are a,c,d, and e coplanar? any explanation?
If anybody know the answer, please tell me...
@fresh pike coplanar simply means that the points are all on the same plane. Since they make up the rectangular base of this object, which is a plane, they are all on the same plane.
huh
?
never thought about it like that
i thought each point was dedicated to one of the triangular planes
+1 knowledge thx
yeah once i read "they are all on the same plane" it clicked
Well, I am glad I could help.
Tell me if you need any other help with things like that.
I wish i could just lay on my notes and let my brain absorb information
yeah definitely will
same to you
😁👍
yes please help
not geo/trig
geography?

logic puzzle
repeatedly go through the list of conditions and rules, and eliminate options from the table
yeah I did that
leaving you with a unique solution
for 2 hours
then realised
there is no fucking way
to do that
they give like 3 direct clues
then it's basically impossible
some clues give you more information than you may realise
uh show me what you have so far
yeah here is the thing
I dont want to wake up my mom
so I didn't show my work
and just trying to do it in my head
how's that related to not having any work?
this is NOT something you'd be able to do in your head (unless you had an eidetic memory)
it's an assignment, most of the work should be yours
show some serious effort and someone may be able to provide some additional pointers

tf are you tryna do in your head
einstein riddles

thats what the zebra puzzle is called
@paper mauve that profile picture is from somwhere, where's it from?
reminds me of Studio Ghilibi
a ray goes in a certain direction right? does that mean this is false?
yea but they go in the same direction so it is true
yeah?
that shows its direction
guilty crown?
no that wasnt it
is this wrong because s isn't in all planes? I thought it was touching the tip of the triangle so it was in all plans
and how are the 3 points in this image cooplanar can someone explain?
@upper karma
i should prob ask squid for help
?
and how is it false. Explanation?
it is quite clear
well in the plane through 3 of them, in order for all 4 to be coplanar, the other one must by in that plane
and the plane through any 3 doesnt contain the 4th one
"well in the plane through 3 of them" is that a typo oorrrrrr
no
the other one meaning "s" right?
well in this situation?
well in this situtation for all 4 of them to be coplanar "S" would have to be in the same plane right?
what do u think......
...
i am quite the uneducated person
@fresh pike
nut
What do the numbers "NU=1 SU = 2, SN = 3" signify?
i already know the midpoint is "U"
the length of the segment
wouldn't the length of it be 2? Like how SU is?
no, because it isnt
represent that information on a diagram
i already know the midpoint is "U"
U isn't the midpoint
just because a point is between two things doesn't make it a midpoint (of those things)
figured that out
After reading to question again
i missed some segments
is it all the boxes?
i got this one wrong
all of them work
@fresh pike notice how they’re not on a plane brother. S is part of the bottom of the figure which is a square. R and T are part of the triangular planes.
answering the question you pinged me on
Sorry for late response
all's good m8
S is not part of any other plane? it touches the tip doesnt it?
S is the center of the triangle on the bottom plane.
this is for the 2nd question right?
gonna repost
Ok
i dont see how it's true
R S T, are coplanar? how so? which common plane do they share?
Three points are always coplanar
S looks like its supposed to represent a line
that's what i thought too ^
i dont think it is
but i guess a line is just a set of points
I mean the plane isn’t on the figure that they’re coplanar on... I suppose you could draw a plane through them all.
Ima just take S as a point
Oh, it does look like a line
a line would be SB
so i could name any 3 points from that figure and it would just be coplanar?
lines can be labelled by a single variable
do u know what coplanar means
on same plane?
why would they do that though
3 points?
If they can be on the same plane then they are coplanar
The plane would connect them all
so this image is False because s is only on the bottom square plane?
They give you 3 points (or if not, a line and 2 points.) which are coplanar, and no matter what point on that line, it will still be coplanar with the other two.
But idk
so any set of 3 points is automatically coplanar. <<<<< final verdict?
Yus
so that image above is not coplanar because s doesnt share the same plane with a,r,c
you mean A,R,C
I don’t think you can connect all 4 with a plane. And so, it’d render it non-coplanar.
also not the image, (points/lines are not co-planar)
No problemo
I tried now
can you help me
is this correct
I'm confused when it says parks at 1st
does this mean
that mirata is in 1st
or just parked at it
I'm confusion please help and review answers
they'd mean the same thing?
I mean for this worksheet from yesterday
it's either this 1st yellow 2nd blue 3rd red 4th green and 5th white
or 1st green 2nd white 3rd yellow 4th blue and 5th red
but the words are trippy and say mirata 1st parked and doesn't specifically say that mirata belongs to 1st
I mean my neighbors park on our house alot
because they dont have anywhere else to park
also when I tried the 1st yellow formation
it didnt work
this one
zucchini bird and hummer dog doesnt work
can you repost the full table
ok
the other side is the same as the top
both sides same
doesn't matter which way you do it
do you have the also the full image of your table with explanations
yeah
oh wait
my table?
the ones on the bottom can be translated to the top
both on top and bottom are the same
you should mark the info in all locations
most of the table is symmetric
eg using the existing markings,
those could also be filled, blacking out all the invalid combos can also make it easier to identify things
there shouldn't be any need for guessing
seeing as you have miata associated with the yellow house which isn't the first, you've messed up somewhere
which also conflicts with the other marking saying its also associated with the 1st green house
like you should really use the whole table
I am astronomically confused
that's why its there
I tried to use all of the table on paper
then I just got even more confused
and just gave up on that
like you'll probs need to go through the list like at least 15 times or something
I just need you to confirm one thing then I can finish it
examples of how you'd use the table:
family that plants eggplants next to family with cats
means eggplant and cats are mutually exclusive
and you can black out that combo on the table
is the order 1st yellow 2nd blue 3rd red 4th green 5th white
oh
its can be very time consuming
like your table should pretty much be fully blacked out
you should also highlight the stuff like
miata with miata
and most things along that diagnoal
the purpose of the table is to show the relationship of EVERY single pair
and if you're not indicating them, you aren't gonna get anywhere
every single pair?
yes
I dont think my teacher will need to see the table so if I understand it enough to solve the question I think blacking out that portion is good enough
i don't even know how you managed to get that far without doing that
i mean its the first and third part worth 30% ea
Is this correct?
no
Where did I go wrong?
you aren't reading the question
you wrote down what theta equals in terms of a and then b
also the a=theta =b should start to make you think that you are not right
Sin(theta) a/21?
sin(theta) = a/21
How do I solve for a from there
I literally don’t know
can you solve something like
2x = 2 for x?
x =1
what about x/2 = 5
10
apply exactly the same idea here
How do I set it up or what do I input to my calculator
you don't input anything
seriously don't overthink it
how did you solve: x/2 = 5 (for x)
i think what he is confused about is solving in terms of theta, but it is sin(theta)
sin(theta) is just an expression, you don't have to evaluate it or anything
just leave it as it is
eg 5 times 🍌 could be expressed as 5🍌 (without knowing the explicit numerical value of 🍌 )
21a = sintheta , is that how I would set it up? I’m sorry I’m just a little confused to how I solve for a in this situation
ramonov:
is where you would start
so how exactly am I supposed to proceed after getting there
how did you solve: x/2 = 5 (for x)
well intuitively you would know 10/2 is 5
what about
solve x/y = 5 (for x)
X would have to be 10 and y would have to be 2
separate question
?
solve x/y = 5 (for x)
x and y here are unkown
rewrite it in the form x= stuff
ok there are major gaps in algebra here.
apply the same operations to both sides of the equation to work towards isolating the variable you want
using x/y = 5 as an example,
to get x by itself, you can multiply both sides of the equation by y
which will result in x = 5y
for x/2 = 5,
you could multiply both sides by 2 to get
x = 5 * 2 = 10
and applying the same concept to this question
to isolate a, get a by itself, you can multiply both sides of your equation by 21
$21 \times \sin(\theta) = 21 \times \frac{a}{21} $
ramonov:

**Can someone possibly provide some guidance on what I maybe doing wrong here?
**
I'm trying to calculate 5km*cos(40) and I'm getting two different results on different calculators.
Result 1 = -3.33469 (TI-NSpire and TI-84 Plus CE)
Result 2 = 3.83022 (Symbolab)
Entry on all devices: 5cos(40)
Is there a setting I maybe missing or messing up?
radians vs degrees
Ah wonderful, thank you for the guidance! I'll check my settings.
For what?
does anyone know a good geometry book for me (i'm doing competitions but i'm terrible at geometry) i'm 9th grade but my teacher hasn't even taught us triangle congruency.
A pair of parallel interstate gas and power lines run 10 meters apart and are equally distant from relay station A. The power company needs to locate a gas-monitoring point on one of the lines exactly 12 meters from relay station A. Draw a diagram showing the locus of possible locations.
How would I go about answering this question?
How do I solve this?
Oh ok tyty
ah i see
what have you tried and where are you stuck
want the honest awnser
i just woke up and forgot i had a test this shit is normally easy accept midpoints i suck at those 100
im doing in now lol
do you still need help with that?
hold up
solveing for x
have you written down an equation to solve
thats what im doing
these are two supplementary angles, they add up to 180°.
then whats the issue
^
me trying to solve for x
have you made the equation for that?
have you written down an equation to solve
you said that's what you were doing, and now you say you're having trouble solving for x, which means you already have an equation but have not yet shown it to us. yes?
Uhhh
that is right
x=14
shoot i need to stop sleeping all day
Drink ☕ like me 😉
yes
I am sure someone would help you, there are many people in this server so you can expect a quick response almost every time
in the first question
what have you tried so far?
you are given 2 angles, and you have to find the third angle
I have 1 min
I don't think I am allowed to help you for a test, that breaks a rule in this server
I can only discuss 😦
I just subtracted the two angles
and the first one i put false
You have an angle RST = 161 degrees. As you can observe from the diagram, both angle RSY and YST lie within angle RST and together make up angle RST. So adding them both gives angle RST. This implies that if you subtract angle RSY from angle RST you get angle YST and if you subtract angle YST from angle RST you get angle RSY.
cool glad you got them correct and understood
Is someone telling you the answer to a hw assignment not allowed on the server?
oh it was an assignment
then telling the answer is fine, as long as you explain it properly and discuss, because the point of this server isnt to get answers, but to learn
hey im writing geometry problems for the class my brother's making and i want to know if there's an easy way to figure this out without drawing this second perp bisector and noticing that it creates a 180 degree angle through the center
like, is it obvious that triangle BOA is equilateral ?
how would you get that OBA is bisected by the line
it's been a while since i did this stuff
all u need to do is note that BOA is isosceles with legs OB=AB, but OB=OA=r, therefore all are equal
(it is isosceles as B is on the perpendicular bisector of AO)
doing what the hint says is silly
bro cot is confusing
there is a differece of pi, so both are negated, but the overall effect is the same
not really
what is related acute angle again?
the answer shouldn't be cot(3pi/4)
related acute angle is the acute angle between the terminal arm and the x-axis
that is obtuse yea
ahhh ok thank u
but i was just saying that the value is still equal
idk the anwser at the back of the textbook says cot(3pi/4)
in this case, rac would be pi/4,
and the answer should be something like
-cot(pi/4)
yea thats what i wrote before
then it good
well I mean you could explicitly write
cot( pi - pi/4)
which isn't the same as writing cot(3pi/4)
though technically cot(3pi/4) is in terms of the rac since pi/4 is in that expression
the wording is vague, but i'd interpret it as having the rac (alone) for the argument (which you did)
Ok thank u
what is rac
https://gyazo.com/ca9db3d6d184ed1e1509c952b8dad197
@lament shell btw why is there a m before the angles, I know it means measure of the angle but seems arbitrary because even without that nothing changes
have u tried thinking about it
Well does the m serve any purpose?
I know but it isn't necessary at all right?
yea
hey guys
can someone assist me in solving for this
i got to
can someone explain this to me
the general solution for cos(t) = 0 are the odd integer multiples of pi/2
(or t=pi/2 is a solution and from properties of cosine, there'll be another solution every pi in either direction)
There are points A,B,C,D on a straight line find point O on the same straight line such that OA:OB = OC:OD ?
I don't really know how to start
<@&286206848099549185>
is there more context?
I don't think so
@upper karma do you have to draw the line im assuming with point O?
I'm assuming you do i'll try to guide you a little
Create your first line we have points (ABCD) , Since we have to make the distance of O from A to B the same as C to D I'd make the order A - D - B - C <-- this is our first line
Drop down about an inch from this line and create a parallel mirror of the same line name this A' - D' - B' - C'
Now (using a ruler so you make sure you have precise measurements and accuracy) connect the lines DB' through a diagonal and C'A
The diagonal where these two lines cross can be marked n
Now if you take a line through n vertically (passing through both the ADBC and A'D'B'C' lines) you have your O point
You can put an O' point too just to keep the pattern
If you get confused through the process lmk, I drew up the picture but I might be going to sleep soon nearly 4am just @ me and i can dm tomorrow if i sleep
how do i work with restrictions on a variable properly?
too vague. what do you mean by "work with"?
@dark sparrow how do i do this properly?
i am not good at math
i ignored the restriction on vt
i don't know how to reason about it
wait, what are you trying to do exactly
solve sin(t)=sin(vt) for t
and what's known about v?
umm. I guess any real?
do you have the problem statement in front of you?
i made the problem
...ok fine
sorry 😭
anyway you're going about this in a way that is inefficient at best
what should i do instead?
perhaps you could write sin(vt) - sin(t) = 0, and then apply the sum to product identity for sine...
if it’s any use, algebraic solver gives:
which seems to be right, i just wanted to know how to solve it myself
ok i'll try that
@dark sparrow i can see where the v+1, v-1, comes from but i still don’t know how to solve 😂
thank you tho
so when a product is equal to 0 you can divide from both sides getting rid of one or the other?
What?
I have 2xy=0
can i divide the 2 and get xy=0 ?
yea
Yes
But that's because you know 2 is not 0
no
You cannot do it with x or y unless you already know they are not 0
lol why would u be able to do that
i have no idea that's why i asked
u literally just contradicted yourself right there
If you have xy = 0 then x = 0 or y = 0 (at least one of the factors must be 0)
You can say x = 0 or y = 0
But it does not come from dividing
you "showed" that it implies x=y=0 even though that isnt necessarily true
@livid moss where does it come from?
The only way to multiply numbers and get 0 is if one of the numbers is 0
if one is 0 then the product is also
It comes from that fact
Yes
of course
The variables are representing real numbers
just use (1/4)^n times 128
Is that a rule?
well the medial triangle is 1/4 of the reference triangle
Wow thanks
and there are 5 layers deep, so n=5
also do u know why that it is 1/4, it is easy to prove
Probably just look up google and memorize the rule lmao
and there are 5 layers deep, so n=5
Isn't it n=4?
yes, oops
to be fair it isnt that easy, ill give u clue, basically prove that all the 4 triangles formed are congruent
so implies they are all a quarter
is this true for cos (with arccos instead of arcssin)?
yea cos also has a period of 2pi
ye but the pi shift also?
If f(x) is a graph
f(x-2) will do what to the graph
I keep forgetting left or right
How about
2f(x)
I remember the shifting horizontally is opposite of common sense
So it is probably right yeah
wait actually it is right
Do you know what 2f(x) do ?
2 f(x) just multiplies everything by 2
I remember something about making it narrow or wide
I forgot these graphs and geometry concepts 😦
it means that f(x) occurs at a later value of the input than it normally has, so the output now shifts to an input further to the right
i.e like u need a greater input to get the same output
would this be symtric postulate or transitive? Im having trouble figuring out if 1/2 counts as a third number which would make it transitive
this has the form of "If A=B and B=C, then A=C" so that's the transitive postulate

