#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages Β· Page 292 of 1
Uh hold on for the name
Tho it is used to get the area of a triangle
Wait a sec
Welp i don't think there is an specific name
dang
yeah its used to find triangle area
i wanted to see some application
on a video
trig formula for area of a triangle probs gets you what you need
ok
Yes
Hello. I have a couple of identically sized rectangles like such:
If i were to calculate the x distance between the centers of both rectangles would the following expression be correct?
(2 x distance from rectangle center to edge) + x seperation.
That's not a formula, that is an expression
Sorry expression, i mean.
If you mean "x separation" as the white part between those 2 rectangles, i think you are right
Ah okay. so assuming that the distance between a rectangle's center and an edge is 0.5 units, and the y seperation is 0.8 units, to get an x separation that is 0.8 I should calculate it as (2 x 0.5) + 0.8?
Iff the y separation and x separation are both 0.8, the general expression for the distance between 2 rectangles that form a horizontal or vertical is (2*0.5)+0.8
But if you choose 2 rectangles, which are located like diagonally, the expression will obviously change
Ah okay, thank you .
Np
I am doing a practice test (not graded) and I'm stuck on this problem. I mostly just guessed because I'm pretty lost on how they'd get any of these answers.
So far I've tried breaking out tanx+cotx to see if those simplify more and getting them under an LCD which gave me sin^2x + cos^2x. I tried breaking that up in a few different ways, but didn't get any of their options.
which gave me sin^2x + cos^2x
could you make that clearer? what's that supposed to be for?
@drifting sorrel
Sorry, it's hard to write these kinds of problems in Discord. Let me try to take a picture of the paper.
Ight
, rotate
I got there and the rest of my scratch paper is just trying every combination of identities to try to get to one of their options
Kind of a crap shoot
you cant just multiply the numerators by something like that
Oh wait, they'd both be over sinxcosx
Dur that was the point of multiplying them lol
need to multiply to both the numerator AND denominator
(otherwise you aren't multiplying by 1, and are changing the value of the expressions)
Right, I was trying to get the denominator to the LCD of (sinx)(cosx) and didn't write it out after multiplying the numerator. So I got the same thing, but just over (sinx)(cosx) now. Let me try playing with this a bit.
Turns out I'm best guesser in all the west and the one I had selected is correct - haha! Thank you for your help, that was a dumb mistake not to put the denominator under it after. I got (cscx)(secx) in the end. :)
ramonov:
Yeah, that's what I got! Then 1 over sin x 1 over cos can be written as csc x sec via reciprocal identity π
Is anyone available for help? Specially need help for f=asin/cos(b(x-c)+d
what have you tried so far
TW is an altitude to hypotenuse
Well, i dont even know where to start!
if you knew TW, would you be able to do the problem?
Whats TW?
Oh, i dont
so you could not do your problem even if you knew how long TW was?
Yes i could
I know how to get the area of a triangle knowing the base lenght and its height
yes ok that's what i wanted to hear
idk why you said no earlier
anyway ok
so why not attempt to find TW then
Because i dont know where to start
Hmmm
Ok, imma call the TW x
So i think i can do 9/x = x/16 right?
yes @lunar plover
So the height would be 12?
yes
And it would be 300 cm^2
uh huh
So first off, i need to calculate the area
you don't NEED to, but that's definitely a possible path
that's right
Given the ellipse:
x^2 + y^2 - 2axy = b^2 ,
Find the length of semi major and semi minor axes for the above ellipse. (a and b are constants)
<@&286206848099549185>
@upper karma
Hey man, I was trying to do this since morning.
Only to realize just now that I was making a silly mistake.
alright
Top two ways to realize your mistakes
1: turn in the test and leave the room
2: ping helpers
hey guys
for this question
i know that you need the distance formula to get the sides
does it matter what qualifies as x1 and x2 and y1 and y2 when you plug into distance formula?
hi, how should i approach this problem
im not as fluent in geometry and i have no idea what i should do first, i tried trig and tried summing up the triangles and squares
but i got stuck
@raw pagoda Consider the smaller triangles formed by the squares and the sides of the main triangle and their angles
thx man

I think yes.
@pure pendant For the circle one, imagine drawing a radius and x is equal to the angle the radius makes with the horizontal axis
in the regular sine graph x is equal to the x-axis value
a square floor is covered with congruent square tiles, the tiles on the diagonals are black, all the rest are white. If there are 101 black tiles, how many are there in total?
How do i do this
Hello @blazing panther
Hello
So, diagonals are black tiles.
Yes
Lemme draw it out.
Ouch, my drawing sucks
So, I make the middle red
That is where the 2 diagonals meet
So, can you count how many black tiles are there in 1 diagonal?
Completely across or until the red dot
Completely across
51
Yep
Since it's the diagonal, every tile move down and right from the top left.
That is horizontal and vertical of the whole square would be 51 tiles wide and 51 tiles long
Oh but that wouldnt work in a regular square right
Because these are tiles so you can easily see how the diagonal tile number equals that width
Well... If the diagonal becomes a line with no width, then you're right, it's hard to find it like that.
But for Area type question, you can always count tiles :)
Thanks so its 51^2?
Yea
Ok i got confused because i tried to do it like a regular geometry problem
So i said it was 51 and i used the pythagorran theorem instead of just matching up the tiles
Thank you
You're welcome!
if theta is between pi/2 and pi then sine is positive but tangent is negative
(because cosine is negative)
π»
Guys, how do i get the real and imaginary parts of sin^-1(a+bi)?
Have you seen cos(ix)=cosh(x) and sin(ix)=isinh(x) before?
Although my simultaneous equations from my method seem pretty fuckin messy without wolfram alpha 
I found this on the net http://mathonweb.com/help_ebook/html/complex_funcs.htm but it doesnt exactly reveal how those formulas came to be. Dont feel like try figure it out but it looks like it vaguely follows
not gonna bother further with this one
i had a thought
i wanted to find out when cos(x) = tan(x)
there are clearly solns to that but the only solns im getting are complex numbers
my strategy was this
$cos(x) = tan(x) = \frac{sin(x)}{cos(x)} => cos^2(x) = sin(x)$
then that's a quadratic in sin(x), solving for sin(x) you get the golden ratio
then i tried doing sin^-1(golden ratio) but i got a complex number
and actually when i plot that function
it coincides exactly with the values
but then when i evaluate sin^-1(golden ratio) i get completely incorrect results
i guess it probably has something to do with complex values not being able to translate to the real plane, but id like a second opinion
uh
i'm pretty sure this has infinitely many solutions
this looks like WAY too little info
i.e.^
are you absolutely sure this is all you have
Yes
then it is impossible to determine the values of x and y.
i personally cant figure out any unique solutions yeah
@open rune Your teacher screwed up
it was on a test I took but idk how to solve it
i highy doubt it's possible to solve
Do you know if it involves trig?
by "solve" do you mean get numerical values for x and y?
or is it "y" as a function of x?
it involves geometry and yes to solve for x and y
k
i'll figure something out
it's impossible, you can "stretch" y however you want
im not sure..
@wraith drum i assumed they were perpendicular and i personally couldnt solve it
as @upper karma said y can be stretched as far as you want
I've got the area as 1/2 x^2 + 3y - 3x + 9/2 , I might be wrong though...
@nimble horizon i apologise if im missing something here but your quadratic sin^2x+sinx-1=0 should have had 2 solutions, one of which was sinx=-goldenratio(x not real), and the other one was (sqrt(5)-1)/2, which if you take inverse sine of should give you your answer
yeah ive done that too
it doesn't match up
i get -0.666
no intersection at that point
Bruh you forgot to take arcsine of it
Or sorry i mean
You have the wrong sign
It shoulld be positive
(1-sqrt(5))/2 is the negative solution, no?
No the negative solution is sinx= (-sqrt(5)-1)/2
You made a mistake solving the qquadratic somewhere theb
hey anyone knows how i can make a square with sin/cos? i cant find nothing in internet
https://gifer.com/en/8ri9
https://gifer.com/en/CXSu
I found this in internet but i think is not a help
Ok, do you agree the quadratic is 1-x^2=x?
Do you agree thats the right quadratic
yeah it is
$x^2 + x - 1 = 0$
Braces aroubd whatev needs to be sqrted
Should be negative 1 at the start
Oh you figured it out
Do you see how to get the general solution from there and everything?
No worries mate. Have a good one
mhm right back at u
wait wait hold up a second
now the other one is the wrong sign
the (-1 - sqrt(5))/2 one
and the (-1 + sqrt(5))/2 is slightly off
tho it's closer now
You are forgetting the arcsin
wait so it looks like this isn't the golden ratio
it just looks very close to it
hM
Sometimes (sqrt(5)-1)/2 is reffered to as the second golden ratio
or its actually the negative of the golden ratio woah
ohhh i see
oh wait im reading on wikipedia
apparently people call it the silver ratio
woah cool
ty
hello
hello
how are you
Question(s) on geometry-trigonometry?
yes
thank you
my friend needs help he just needs to be in the server for 10 minutes to talk
she*
so i will speak for her

okay so basically
i walk forward on a bearing of x to point B
then i turn and walk forward on another bearing to point C
I start on point A
how would i find the bearing of point C from A?
thank you in advance
it really depends on the angle. I made an example.
the red angles are the same, the green angles add up = 180 degrees.
are you given the distances walked?
yes
A --> 20km --> B on a bearing of 100 deg
B ----> 15km -----> C on a bearing of 190 deg
so yeh, construct a proper bearing diagram
and find the information needed by applying stuff like the sine and/or cosine laws
okay
so we know that triangle is right angled, right? how do you prove that? do you use what i learnt two years ago with co-interior and different types of angles adding up to 180deg?
which triange are you referring to?
the one made up by the three points
1 sec
okay
yes
NS axes are parallel to each other
similar with EW axes
so you can use cointerior angles
yes, that could be applied here
wow! thanks for your help
note that if the angles weren't as nice, you would probably need to apply those laws stated
don't even need to involve minutes and seconds
eg if the bearing from B was 180Β° instead of 190Β°.
you won't get a right angle at B, and would involve more calculations
radians are just a unit of angle
there are 2Ο radians in a full circle
really all you need here is a calculator with a radian mode and an understanding of basic trigonometry
well I would need to know what to press on that calculator
are you familiar with the basics of trigonometry? what one might call "SOHCAHTOA", after the mnemonic central to it?
Yes I am
so is it clear that $d = \frac{16}{\cos(0.19)}$?
Ann:
Yes
and you don't know how to evaluate cos(0.19) using your calculator?
if so then that is an issue with your lack of knowledge about your calculator and not the problem itself
oh so ican uust plug in .19 radians into cos?
how else do you think you would evaluate cos(0.19) if not by entering cos(0.19) into your calculator?
I thought that I would have to do some more math to find what .19 was equal to
what do you mean "find what 0.19 was equal to"
in degress
your calculator almost certainly has a radian mode
it does, ive solved the problem now
BUT, if you wanted to convert 0.19 radians to degrees, that's a matter of multiplying by the number of degrees in a radian
i.e. 180/pi
0.19 times 180/pi?
converting between radians and degrees is no different than converting between two units of the same physical quantity like feet and inches
yes that's what i said
Cool, thanks
Hei can i agsk a qestion?
The help channels are solely for help with math, so feel free to post your question. Asking whether you can ask a question or if anyone knows about some specific topic is unnecessary, so please try to avoid questions of that nature.
Go with it
Ill take that as a yes?
Of course.
So i made up this wacky question, and im tryna find a and b
So the given information is two points, and the angle between them.
And I want to see if I can find out the point where the angle starts, the lengths of a, b, etc
Idk if its possible tho.
Maybe 2 points an angle is too little?
(So the actual points used to be (2.3, 0) and (-1.6, -1.4), but I added some numbers to make it harder since the original points give away length a)
So should be a = 2.3, and b = sqrt(4.52)
But yeah idk how i'd solve it just given information (5.8, 7.9) (4.2, 4.2) and 140 degrees
There's too little information. Remember your circle geometry? If you mark two points on the circle, and then draw lines from both those points to a 3rd point on the circle, the angle is the same no matter where the 3rd point is
Yea, tho id see how that'd help?
Your intended solution is point C
But point D, or point E, or any other point on the circle also works
True, it doesn't show a way to calculate the coordinates of the point
I think linear algebra can probably be used to fill in the missing point, and solve for it.
Using cosine rule for dot product or something
Yea, I think that probably works
Which was how I constructed the problem in the first place, so it feels a bit like cheating
xD
AB, can be found really easily, so I was hoping there was some clean nice geometric solution
Hey peeps, I have a question, prove that sin(nx)/1+cos(nx)=tan(nx/2) for all natural values of "n"
i haven't tried complex analysis, but i'm scared it will get complicated
we already proved this few days ago
$\frac{\sin(nx)}{1} + \cos(nx) \neq \tan(nx/2)$
Ann:
it is not
well, i'd go with "are you allergic to parentheses" on any other day, but that would probably make you write sinnx / 1+cosnx = tannx/2 or something to that effect
@dark sparrow that spacing is bigger than my future
it was exaggerated on purpose.
anyway, let ΞΈ = nx/2 and apply double angle identities on the left hand side
oh got it, thanks
@upper karma About your question. There is not enough information to find a and b. What I was taught in school is that you need at least 3 of the 6 information of a triangle, namely the length of the 3 sides, and the 3 angles, to find the remaining information.
I am not sure if this can help you.
Right, so that question only gives 1 side and 1 angle, so its not enough. That makes sense
Hi
is ther e a place i can learn the trig functions in depth
i only really know 2 things
trig ratios
and this other thing on the calculator
im a nob
khanacademy
idk unit circle mebe?
ok
the algrebra 2 book i got isnt really that helpful
it just has questions
lol
ill use khan academy
thanks
I mean id probably serahc for a lot of practice questions
to really learn the identities
okay, thanks
Find the midpoint of the segment that has endpoints at (a+b, a-b) and (a,b)

π¦
Yeah
Sorry I was busy
X+X divided by 2 equals the x coordinate for midpoint
And just replace the xβs with yβs
What

I am trying to prove that if the an n-sided convex polygon has at least one side parallel to x and at least one side parallel to y. Then, n is the multiple of 4.
if you have two sides that are perpendicular to one another then some multiple of the external angle will be 90Β°
if you have two sides that are perpendicular to one another then some multiple of the external angle will be 90Β°
@dark sparrow This is what I am unable to understand.
In order for one side to align to the vertical and another side to the horizontal, the sum of the exterior angles of some k consecutive sides must equal 90.
Why sum of the exterior angles of some k consecutive sides must be equal to 90?
i could give you either an informal explanation of this fact or an alternative proof that isn't handwavy
The one which will help me to solve some more similar questions would be the best.
yus mission accomplished
I successfully proved law of cosines independently... I just had to look at a triangle for 10 minutes before being able to do anything. Aaaand my proof is more algebraic than geometric so yus
take your pair of perpendicular sides
connect their midpoints to the center of the polygon
the resulting angle at the center will be 90Β° by assumption
but on the other hand, if you considered the angle subtended by one side at the center, that'd be (360/n)Β° bc your polygon is regular
ok i think it's time i made a picture
or not bc i'm lazy
I will check that if (sum of exterior angles + 90) = 180 in this case. If it is then, I am happy to move on.
Proofs should be easy because they are just logic. ;_;
3x+x+90 = 180
So, 4x = 90. That is the sum of the exterior angles should be 90 degrees.
Next up on my list of things to prove:: i have no idea whatsoever but I think perhaps Eulerβs identity that e^pii = -1.
wait either that or binomial theorem...
Either seem reasonable
prove/construct real numbers and its arithmetic operations
its seems pretty reasonable
;^)
@upper karma try e^ix = cos(x) + i sin(x)
What's the problem?
I think tilde means "whats the problem you have" more specifically
Oh ok
I honestly dont know what the specific problem is, I have absolutely no clue how 1 is the answer
have you ever worked with radians before?
Yes
HoboSas:
and do you know the ratios for trig functions of special angles?
I definitly learned them, probably just forgetting what they are
revise them
like 2pi = 360 and stuff liek that?
they're very common
r u talking about the angles and radians of the trig circle?
Yea
and the numerical value of something like
sin(pi/2) = sin(90Β°) is something you should definitely know
Oooh so in the problem I posted the pi/2 was radians
I was trying to plug it in for opposite/hypoeneus
plug what in for opp/hyp
sin(o/h) sin(pi/2)
If it's easier for you to think in terms of degrees, you can convert radians to degrees by multiplying the radians by 180/pi.
and isn't the ratio of the opposite and the hypotenuse
i dont understand how to do 2) and 3)
same
oh
Hello kurax
For number 2, can you find any real life situation that you'll have to use the scalene triangle?
Like can you find a real life object that is of triangular shape and it's useful for you?
@arctic vortex
That's a good one too
but its not scalene
it said to do it in a scalene triangle shape
Okay, is the flatiron building a scalene triangle?
real life triangles are too regular π¦
Artificial stuff~
yes
i cant find a scalene triangle
am i allowed to say deformed in a school assignment
If you can point out why a deformed one is useful, then yes
Like if you have to hang different stuff, or need to use the hanger to do other things
doorstop?
Oh, nice one
Do you recall the triangle inequality?
yes
Use that
sum of 2 angles must be greater than the third side?
Sum of 2 sides
yea
Done?
i still dont understand it :(
oh ok
And then try to calculate all 3 situations of the triangle inequality
how do i use a ruler in microsoft word
Hmm.....
Place the ruler on the screen, I do that when I am doing measuring myself before I print it out
But make sure that the paper in the screen fits the paper in real life
Oh....
There's another method, use the insert line function, and draw a line directly on top of the given line of the triangle
Microsoft words would tell you the horizontal span and vertical span of the line. Use Pythagoras theorem to calculate the length of the line
Double click your drawn line
ok
It should show on the top right
Yea, that's the dimension.
ok
Hmmm....
Do you know how to reshape your line so that it is exactly the same with one side, let's say 'a'
yea
That's good!
like this one
Yea, seems like it
ok
Remember to jot down your results!
\
Nice!
ok so do i measure them?
Do you know Pythagoras theorem?
Yea
yeah i know that
Since height and width is given, you can use Pythagorean to solve the length by
ok
$\sqrt{Height^2+Width^2}$
Biscuit:
Please continue for b and c and mark down in your file π
Did you take the square root?
Good! Remember for sides of triangles, we keep our letters in lowercase
a=1.97
b=2.9
c=3.92
Now we have to compare sum of 2 sides is larger than the remaining side
We have 3 cases
Yea, you just have to type that into your document like
a + b = 1.97+2.9 = 4.87 which is bigger than c=3.92
is this good
That's pretty good, but we still got to add in the numbers to 'show' it is really 'greater'
Sure
See ya later~
back @dusky surge
You're fast
wait whats the difference betwen lines and angles?
Huge difference.
Basically they are not the same.
Have you ever heard of Law of sines?
But it's good enough for an assessment I guessπ
oh
Oh, you want me to point out or just submit?
can u point it out pls?
Sure
For Q3, you might wanna do the addition for your teacher since this would truly show that you did the math.
oh ok
the teacher wouldnt know you did the math if you don't write it down
ok
i will do that
thanks!
can u also help me review for a test
"parallel lines intersected by a transversal"
Q4, the Pythagoras just help you find the length of the sides but but not the angles, so it's not right.
oh
Angles should be marked with CAPITAL LETTERS like A,B,C. And sides should be in lowercase letters like a,b,c
Law of sines can be used to find the angles, but I am not sure if you have learnt that.
can u also help me review for a test
And for this, I don't know if I can do it because I gonna sleep soonπ
Have you learnt 'sine'?
You can use direct comparsion on the 3 angles to see which is the smallest
oh
You can say, use fingers to 'measure' them as a tool of comparing
Like making an angle with 2 fingers, and find that the smallest one the fingers will be closest together
oh
That's one method of estimation for elemetary school
I am not sure what your teacher wants, but IMO it's something that you'll have to figure out.
Which you did use your understanding and concepts to tackle this problem, which is already better than most of the students

rlly o wow
Just wanna say you did great. By asking, and by trying it out yourself.
Sure
yay
Thank you @dark sparrow for that sliver of info.
pretty straightforward proof.
now to prove that e^ix = cos(x) + isin(x)
this is a normal equation, but I didn't understand what my teacher did
She subtracted 30 degrees from both sides.
$x+30-30=y-10-30 \ x = y-40$
leviosa:
Why the y is after the equal sign?
?
What's the original problem?
I was taught that letters are before the equal sign
x is a letter?
When you're looking for the value of a "letter" or otherwise known as a variable.
You want to look for what that specific variable is equal to.
he isolated the variable x
So
Exactly. And that gave him the x value.
Alternatively, y=x+40.
Idk what the problem is asking for etc.
I didn't know that moving numbers between the first and second member counted how to isolate the variable, I thought that what counted how to isolate was to move another variable.
I understood it now
Sorry for my english, I'm using the translator for hard words XD
Nah it's fine.
How school level are you?
I'm 16 years old.
I'm 15
I turned 16 6 days ago 
I am Nine year (1 year until high school
I did 15y yesterday lol
Ooo.
Nice.
Happy birthday lol.
I'm going to 11th grade in a few months.
After the summer is over.
Nice
u smart for a 16 yr old @upper karma
I dumb asf.
But pls clarify.
@upper karma
u be answering bare question with ease
and im pretty sure you answered some difficult questions before

But thanks lol.

i might be mixing u up with someone else tbh
LOL.
Thanks for the ego boost ~~and unboost
~~
im sorry fit the unboost π¦
nah but i have a feeling u be solving hard ass questions

Awesome
yo so is sin squred of lets say 5x plus cos squred of 5x equal to 1
sin^2(5x)+cos^2(5x)=1 yes
"squred"
Ok
https://gyazo.com/fb58cfbe15c190a58a230980e2b61887
how would you do this?
multiple applications of pythagoras and properties of addition
I got 28.9, is that correct?
not what i'm getting. show work
wait. sry misread the question
thought it was asking for CD,
so just one application of pythag,
properties of addition
and inverse trig
but still doesn't get 28.9 (Β°) for me
no, not 6/14
nvm I got 27.6
why is it multiplied by 180 degrees over pi?
conversion to degrees
since the default output on wolfram is in radians
ok
if your calc is already set in degrees, you don't need to
kk
Hello, I was hoping someone could help explain how this is working?
I'm meant to find AC, but I have no idea why they're able to multiply both sides by sin(B)
why not?
what's wrong with multiplying both sides by sin(B)?
I don't know how they managed to go from
to
$b=a\frac{\sin(B)}{\sin(A)}=\frac{a\cdot\sin(B)}{\sin(A)}$
HoboSas:
But why? I don't get it
you multiply both sides by sin(B)
$\frac{b}{\sin(B)}=\frac{a}{\sin(A)}$ $\frac{b}{\sin(B)}\cdot\sin(B)=\frac{a}{\sin(A)}\cdot\sin(B)}$
HoboSas:
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for details. (You may edit your message)
ofc, I just don't see how they're equal
It just says to do something without explaining why it works
okay now listen
?????
let's say 5 = 5 ok?
if you multiply BOTH sides by 2
you would get 10 = 10
right?
So you see the equality still holds?
They're still equal to each other.
Both sides
This is the same thing that happens there.
if you multiply BOTH sides of the equality, the expression on the left will still be equal to the expression on the right
Do you get it now? or
That's not the issue, it's a Khan Academy trigonometry thing I'm following and up until this point they've covered the stuff that's come up in the questions beforehand explaining why everything works the way it does. I got to this question and was stuck, I can see that they're equal but I don't know why.
so you have never heard of law of sines?:
a/sin(A) = b/sin(B) = c/sin(C) I think
I don't see how
b = a(sin(B)/sin(A))
comes into it
you forgot the c/sin(C) part
and you multiply both sides by sin(B)
What? I just copied what was on the screenshot
I meant that you leave it in the bin
trece:
if we find b from here
we can plug it back in the equation to see if the sides are equal
$b = \frac{5\cdot\sin(108)}{\sin(31)}=9.23$
trece:
$\frac{b}{\sin(B)}=\frac{9.23}{\sin(108)} = 9.7\
\frac{a}{\sin(A)}=\frac{5}{\sin(31)}=9.7$
trece:
as you can see both give 9.7
i mean thats really just what law of sines says
the law of sines tells us that those will be equal to each other.
so you dont need to doubt it
Thanks I guess
I'll sleep on it because I'm lost here
we are not getting your question
lmao
whats the question?
scroll up
it was an interesting discussion
i just skimmed thru it and damn i'm lost for words
I dont know if this fits in this channel, but could anyone help me with this?
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/701658660526620702/725791761049452634/unknown.png
It does fit here.
well if x + y + z = 180 then the angle BCD = angle x
and angle BAZ = angle y
@nocturne dove ^
^
You can develop loads of stuff from there
^
Lol
^
aite thanks guys
np
Hmmm
Hmmm
Can someone please tell me what my mistake is? The result should be 5dm2 but I got 6,9dm2
I'll use a meme
use the formula indicated above. (i.e. apply the cosine law)
also not a fan of using h_m and h_f to indicate the respective altitudes of your triangles.
wait 1 sec.
that formula looks questionable
either that and/or the diagram
I guess the diagram
But like, Iβm not sure
Thatβs just what I got to work with
And thank you for helping me
My teacher didnβt answer my Mail with the question
for the formula to be correct, the epsilon should be marked at angle RPQ
which takes quite a bit of effort to determine
@upper karma ahahah
also "general square"...
Sorry I translated it from German
I had to use google translator, Iβm not familiar with English math vocabulary at all
So, I guess I tried what you said but either I made a mistake again or idk
the english term would be (convex) quadrilateral
Uhh
Okay
but as mentioned the formula/diagram arent consistent and/or wrong
So, I should just not try to solve it and tell my teacher that itβs not solvable?
technically its solvable. is that the original diagram as given?
Yes
to be consistent with the formula
epsilon should be here:
and you can determine possible values of that with the use of the sin law.
Yeah well the diagram is given but I made the labels that arenβt black
Sorry I thought that was clear because it stated that one should label the diagram
Okay so
When epsilon is there
What would I have to do then?
Because like
No matter where it is
It is given that itβs 32 degrees
And I calculated the Formular with that
angle RQP is given as 32 but that isn't the angle you should be using to find x
Okay, so the Formular itself is wrong?
Which one should I be using?
the formula is fine with a correctly labelled diagram
you can first apply the sine law to determine possible values of angle QRP
How do I do that?
ramonov:
Okay Iβll try
Wait but wouldnβt according to that epsilon be at yet another place
Like
Where R is instead of P like you drew it
Or no
Sorry
I was getting sth wrong
Or am I
Now Iβm not sure anymore
Yeah
Like
When you take 312 which is f, the angle would have to be at R wouldnβt it?
that is a bit unclear,
but the ratio of the sin of that angle (unambiguously referred to as angleQRP) and the side(f) is represented on the left side of the equation above
Guys, I'm having problems with a question. Let ABC be a triangle right-angled at B, If the opposite side to an angle "theta" has a length (x^2)-4 and the adjacent side to "theta" has a length 4x, then what will be the smallest value attainable by the ratio between the area of the triangle and sin(theta).
have you made a diagram yet
tried it, but the ratio is a polynomial and the minimum value is negative infinity
can you show me the polynomial?
also keep in mind that 4x and x^2 - 4 both have to be positive
The help channels are solely for help with math, so feel free to post your question. Asking whether you can ask a question or if anyone knows about some specific topic is unnecessary, so please try to avoid questions of that nature.
Ask :)
that is simply not true
That's kinda spoiling
no it's not...
,calc cos(sin(tan(1)))
Result:
0.54037772137207
it being a show question implies that its true,
when its not one needs to point out there is likely and error with the problem
is that in degrees though? @weary drift
,calc cos(sin(tan(pi/180)))
Result:
0.9998476796922
regardless of whether the argument of tan is in degrees or radians,
its still false
it is exactly approximately true
That's unlucky
that was a copswing bait rokabe
input it on your calculators with degree mode
calculator is not precise
Neither is wolfram
wolfram is precise enough
Mmmh
then what should i do with the question
can you show exactly how the question is being presented
problem: show that 1 = 2
what would you do with this question?
it doesn't make sense, just as the last one, you're asked to prove a false identity
Apply (mod 0) both sides
can you show exactly how the question is being presented
@silent plank
show that cos(sin(tan(1Β°))) = 1
Are you using Taylor's approx?
if it were: $\cos(\sin(\tan({\color{red}{0}}))) = 1$ then it would be true. in which case you can simplify stuff from the inside.
ramonov:
Report him
just a math question
might be a bit of an exaggeration,
but if your teacher asked you to prove 1+1 = 3 (something trivially false)
would you be confident in their ability to teach math?
A small mistake can crash a rocket into a planet
but 1+1 is approximately equal to 3
a large 2 is basically 3
you can say 10 is approx equal to 20 just so you can know
just so you can know, that is incredibly dumb to say
approximations are always true unless you put that weird sign
are you high or trolling now
lol absolutely not
in the question the teacher gave cos(....) is approx equal to 1
so stop saying i should report him
cos(....) is approx equal to 1
that was never mentioned
$=$ does NOT mean approximately equal to
ramonov:
and when one writes =, one would assume it means equal to
or if you cant find a symbol for it, explicitly state it in words
for what?
jesus fucking christ it's NOT A TRUE IDENTITY
what class are you in and what are you allowed to use?
he backtracked and stated its meant to be $\approx$
ramonov: