#geometry-and-trigonometry

1 messages Β· Page 292 of 1

upper karma
#

Otherwise someone like me wouldn't have understood

#

Other lines seem okay! πŸ‘

nova prawn
#

If you are avaliable

pine oar
#

What is the name of this?

upper karma
#

Uh hold on for the name

#

Tho it is used to get the area of a triangle

#

Wait a sec

#

Welp i don't think there is an specific name

pine oar
#

dang

#

yeah its used to find triangle area

#

i wanted to see some application

#

on a video

silent plank
#

trig formula for area of a triangle probs gets you what you need

pine oar
#

ok

upper karma
#

Yes

naive harbor
#

If i were to calculate the x distance between the centers of both rectangles would the following expression be correct?

#

(2 x distance from rectangle center to edge) + x seperation.

upper karma
#

That's not a formula, that is an expression

naive harbor
#

Sorry expression, i mean.

upper karma
#

If you mean "x separation" as the white part between those 2 rectangles, i think you are right

naive harbor
#

Ah okay. so assuming that the distance between a rectangle's center and an edge is 0.5 units, and the y seperation is 0.8 units, to get an x separation that is 0.8 I should calculate it as (2 x 0.5) + 0.8?

upper karma
#

Iff the y separation and x separation are both 0.8, the general expression for the distance between 2 rectangles that form a horizontal or vertical is (2*0.5)+0.8

#

But if you choose 2 rectangles, which are located like diagonally, the expression will obviously change

naive harbor
#

Ah okay, thank you .

upper karma
#

Np

drifting sorrel
#

I am doing a practice test (not graded) and I'm stuck on this problem. I mostly just guessed because I'm pretty lost on how they'd get any of these answers.

So far I've tried breaking out tanx+cotx to see if those simplify more and getting them under an LCD which gave me sin^2x + cos^2x. I tried breaking that up in a few different ways, but didn't get any of their options.

silent plank
#

which gave me sin^2x + cos^2x
could you make that clearer? what's that supposed to be for?

#

@drifting sorrel

drifting sorrel
#

Sorry, it's hard to write these kinds of problems in Discord. Let me try to take a picture of the paper.

upper karma
#

Ight

drifting sorrel
#

Taking pictures is hard apparently lol

silent plank
#

, rotate

somber coyoteBOT
drifting sorrel
#

I got there and the rest of my scratch paper is just trying every combination of identities to try to get to one of their options

#

Kind of a crap shoot

silent plank
#

you cant just multiply the numerators by something like that

drifting sorrel
#

Oh wait, they'd both be over sinxcosx

#

Dur that was the point of multiplying them lol

silent plank
#

need to multiply to both the numerator AND denominator

#

(otherwise you aren't multiplying by 1, and are changing the value of the expressions)

drifting sorrel
#

Right, I was trying to get the denominator to the LCD of (sinx)(cosx) and didn't write it out after multiplying the numerator. So I got the same thing, but just over (sinx)(cosx) now. Let me try playing with this a bit.

#

Turns out I'm best guesser in all the west and the one I had selected is correct - haha! Thank you for your help, that was a dumb mistake not to put the denominator under it after. I got (cscx)(secx) in the end. :)

somber coyoteBOT
drifting sorrel
#

Yeah, that's what I got! Then 1 over sin x 1 over cos can be written as csc x sec via reciprocal identity πŸ‘Œ

rugged timber
#

Is anyone available for help? Specially need help for f=asin/cos(b(x-c)+d

lunar plover
#

Can help me solve something?

#

I need to find the area of this triangle

dark sparrow
#

what have you tried so far

novel flax
#

TW is an altitude to hypotenuse

lunar plover
#

Well, i dont even know where to start!

dark sparrow
#

if you knew TW, would you be able to do the problem?

lunar plover
#

Whats TW?

dark sparrow
#

....the length of that line segment

#

look at the diagram

lunar plover
#

Oh, i dont

dark sparrow
#

so you could not do your problem even if you knew how long TW was?

lunar plover
#

Yes i could

#

I know how to get the area of a triangle knowing the base lenght and its height

dark sparrow
#

yes ok that's what i wanted to hear

#

idk why you said no earlier

#

anyway ok

#

so why not attempt to find TW then

lunar plover
#

Because i dont know where to start

#

Hmmm

#

Ok, imma call the TW x

#

So i think i can do 9/x = x/16 right?

novel flax
#

yes @lunar plover

lunar plover
#

So the height would be 12?

novel flax
#

yes

lunar plover
#

And it would be 300 cm^2

dark sparrow
#

well there you have it don't you

#

except... 1/2 (25 * 12) is not 300

lunar plover
#

Oh right

#

I forgot about that xD

#

Lets do another one

#

So i have this

dark sparrow
#

uh huh

lunar plover
#

So first off, i need to calculate the area

dark sparrow
#

do you?

#

all you're asked for here is BC as it seems

lunar plover
#

OH

#

So i first need to fond BD

#

Then i use pythagore to find BC!

dark sparrow
#

you don't NEED to, but that's definitely a possible path

lunar plover
#

I am actually not as bad as i thought

#

So the BC is 80 right?

novel flax
#

that's right

lunar plover
#

So i would basically do the same for this one right?

dark sparrow
#

well it's exactly the same setup isn't it

#

just with the numbers changed

lunar plover
#

Yeah

#

2385 cm

weary heart
#

Given the ellipse:

x^2 + y^2 - 2axy = b^2 ,
Find the length of semi major and semi minor axes for the above ellipse. (a and b are constants)

#

<@&286206848099549185>

upper karma
#

you should have waited to ping the helpers

#

anyway what have you tried?

weary heart
#

@upper karma
Hey man, I was trying to do this since morning.
Only to realize just now that I was making a silly mistake.

upper karma
#

alright

idle bloom
#

Top two ways to realize your mistakes

#

1: turn in the test and leave the room

#

2: ping helpers

pine oar
#

hey guys

#

for this question

#

i know that you need the distance formula to get the sides

#

does it matter what qualifies as x1 and x2 and y1 and y2 when you plug into distance formula?

dark sparrow
#

no, distance is symmetric

#

d(A,B) = d(B,A)

raw pagoda
#

im not as fluent in geometry and i have no idea what i should do first, i tried trig and tried summing up the triangles and squares

#

but i got stuck

wooden current
#

@raw pagoda Consider the smaller triangles formed by the squares and the sides of the main triangle and their angles

raw pagoda
#

thx man

wooden current
dusky surge
#

I think yes.

upper karma
#

what two graphs?

#

there's only one graph

#

and a unit circle

tender kite
#

@pure pendant For the circle one, imagine drawing a radius and x is equal to the angle the radius makes with the horizontal axis

#

in the regular sine graph x is equal to the x-axis value

blazing panther
#

a square floor is covered with congruent square tiles, the tiles on the diagonals are black, all the rest are white. If there are 101 black tiles, how many are there in total?

#

How do i do this

dusky surge
#

Hello @blazing panther

blazing panther
#

Hello

dusky surge
#

So, diagonals are black tiles.

blazing panther
#

Yes

dusky surge
#

Lemme draw it out.

#

Ouch, my drawing sucks

#

So, I make the middle red

#

That is where the 2 diagonals meet

#

So, can you count how many black tiles are there in 1 diagonal?

blazing panther
#

Completely across or until the red dot

dusky surge
#

Completely across

blazing panther
#

51

dusky surge
#

Yep

#

Since it's the diagonal, every tile move down and right from the top left.

#

That is horizontal and vertical of the whole square would be 51 tiles wide and 51 tiles long

blazing panther
#

Oh but that wouldnt work in a regular square right

#

Because these are tiles so you can easily see how the diagonal tile number equals that width

dusky surge
#

Well... If the diagonal becomes a line with no width, then you're right, it's hard to find it like that.

#

But for Area type question, you can always count tiles :)

blazing panther
#

Thanks so its 51^2?

dusky surge
#

Yea

blazing panther
#

Ok i got confused because i tried to do it like a regular geometry problem

#

So i said it was 51 and i used the pythagorran theorem instead of just matching up the tiles

dusky surge
#

More like a tricky question XD

#

Aha

#

Anyways there ya go

blazing panther
#

Thank you

dusky surge
#

You're welcome!

upper karma
#

how is the answer b and not c

#

o

#

i got it

minor field
#

if theta is between pi/2 and pi then sine is positive but tangent is negative

#

(because cosine is negative)

upper karma
#

I’m very lost here

#

If someone could help

#

doing what? lol

upper karma
#

πŸ‘»

upper karma
#

@upper karma Apply the distance formula

#

That’s to show that they are congruent

upper karma
#

@upper karma YOO I PLAY THE EUPHONIUM.

#

LOW BRASS GANG.

#

POG.

upper karma
#

Ayyy

#

Low brass rules the world

wraith drum
#

Guys, how do i get the real and imaginary parts of sin^-1(a+bi)?

versed river
#

Have you seen cos(ix)=cosh(x) and sin(ix)=isinh(x) before?

#

Although my simultaneous equations from my method seem pretty fuckin messy without wolfram alpha catThink

nimble horizon
#

i had a thought

#

i wanted to find out when cos(x) = tan(x)

#

there are clearly solns to that but the only solns im getting are complex numbers

#

my strategy was this

#

$cos(x) = tan(x) = \frac{sin(x)}{cos(x)} => cos^2(x) = sin(x)$

somber coyoteBOT
nimble horizon
#

and then

#

since $cos^2(x) = 1 - sin^2(x)$

somber coyoteBOT
nimble horizon
#

you get

#

$1 - sin^2(x) = sin(x)$

somber coyoteBOT
nimble horizon
#

then that's a quadratic in sin(x), solving for sin(x) you get the golden ratio

#

then i tried doing sin^-1(golden ratio) but i got a complex number

#

and actually when i plot that function

#

but then when i evaluate sin^-1(golden ratio) i get completely incorrect results

#

i guess it probably has something to do with complex values not being able to translate to the real plane, but id like a second opinion

open rune
#

I know i would have to solve the triangle first

dark sparrow
#

uh

eternal crag
#

i'm pretty sure this has infinitely many solutions

dark sparrow
#

this looks like WAY too little info

eternal crag
#

i.e.^

open rune
#

Apparently that was all that was given

#

I’m just as confused

dark sparrow
#

are you absolutely sure this is all you have

open rune
#

Yes

nimble horizon
#

wHO ping

#

*pinged

dark sparrow
#

then it is impossible to determine the values of x and y.

supple onyx
#

i personally cant figure out any unique solutions yeah

wraith drum
#

@open rune Your teacher screwed up

open rune
#

it was on a test I took but idk how to solve it

supple onyx
#

i highy doubt it's possible to solve

wraith drum
#

Do you know if it involves trig?

upper karma
#

by "solve" do you mean get numerical values for x and y?

wraith drum
#

or is it "y" as a function of x?

open rune
#

it involves geometry and yes to solve for x and y

wraith drum
#

k

open rune
#

i'll figure something out

wraith drum
#

is x perpendicular to y

#

like the lines

upper karma
#

it's impossible, you can "stretch" y however you want

open rune
#

im not sure..

supple onyx
#

@wraith drum i assumed they were perpendicular and i personally couldnt solve it

#

as @upper karma said y can be stretched as far as you want

wraith drum
#

I've got the area as 1/2 x^2 + 3y - 3x + 9/2 , I might be wrong though...

versed river
#

@nimble horizon i apologise if im missing something here but your quadratic sin^2x+sinx-1=0 should have had 2 solutions, one of which was sinx=-goldenratio(x not real), and the other one was (sqrt(5)-1)/2, which if you take inverse sine of should give you your answer

nimble horizon
#

yeah ive done that too

#

it doesn't match up

#

i get -0.666

#

no intersection at that point

versed river
#

Bruh you forgot to take arcsine of it

#

Or sorry i mean

#

You have the wrong sign

#

It shoulld be positive

nimble horizon
#

(1-sqrt(5))/2 is the negative solution, no?

versed river
#

No the negative solution is sinx= (-sqrt(5)-1)/2

#

You made a mistake solving the qquadratic somewhere theb

nimble horizon
#

i don't think so

#

Let me check

versed river
peak mesa
#

hey anyone knows how i can make a square with sin/cos? i cant find nothing in internet

nimble horizon
#

I swear i remember it as (1-sqrt(5))/2

#

let me run it through mathematica

peak mesa
versed river
#

Ok, do you agree the quadratic is 1-x^2=x?

nimble horizon
#

*wolframalpha

#

sorry internet is iffy

versed river
#

Do you agree thats the right quadratic

nimble horizon
#

yeah it is

versed river
#

Yeah no worries

#

Ok then

nimble horizon
#

i see

#

so i need to find my mistake then

#

here's what i did

versed river
#

You mustve messed up a sign in the quadratic somewhere

#

Lemme see

nimble horizon
#

$x^2 + x - 1 = 0$

somber coyoteBOT
nimble horizon
#

$x = \frac{1 \pm \sqrt{(1^2 - 4(1)(-1))}}{2}$

#

hopefully this works

#

lmAo oof

versed river
#

\sqrt

#

Plaintext if youd like is perfectly fine though

nimble horizon
#

aaaaa

#

you get the idea tho right

#

OH yeah i see it wait

versed river
#

Braces aroubd whatev needs to be sqrted

nimble horizon
#

i see it i see it

#

should be -1 in the beginning part

somber coyoteBOT
versed river
#

Should be negative 1 at the start

#

Oh you figured it out

#

Do you see how to get the general solution from there and everything?

nimble horizon
#

yeah i do

#

the sign was messing me up ty

versed river
#

No worries mate. Have a good one

nimble horizon
#

mhm right back at u

#

wait wait hold up a second

#

now the other one is the wrong sign

#

the (-1 - sqrt(5))/2 one

#

and the (-1 + sqrt(5))/2 is slightly off

#

tho it's closer now

versed river
#

I mean the (-1-sqrt5)/2 one is complex

#

Its pretty exact for me

nimble horizon
versed river
#

You are forgetting the arcsin

nimble horizon
#

OHH lmfaooo

#

sorry

versed river
#

Nice meme

#

Bahaha dont worry about it

nimble horizon
#

wait so it looks like this isn't the golden ratio

#

it just looks very close to it

#

hM

versed river
#

Sometimes (sqrt(5)-1)/2 is reffered to as the second golden ratio

nimble horizon
#

or its actually the negative of the golden ratio woah

#

ohhh i see

#

oh wait im reading on wikipedia

#

apparently people call it the silver ratio

#

woah cool

#

ty

hushed spear
#

hello

dusky surge
#

hello

hushed spear
#

how are you

dusky surge
#

Question(s) on geometry-trigonometry?

hushed spear
#

yes

#

thank you

#

my friend needs help he just needs to be in the server for 10 minutes to talk

she*

#

so i will speak for her

upper karma
hushed spear
#

okay so basically

#

i walk forward on a bearing of x to point B

#

then i turn and walk forward on another bearing to point C

#

I start on point A

#

how would i find the bearing of point C from A?

#

thank you in advance

dusky surge
#

it really depends on the angle. I made an example.

fast burrow
#

wow thank you (i'm the friend)

#

πŸ™‚

silent plank
#

are you given the distances walked?

fast burrow
#

yes

#

A --> 20km --> B on a bearing of 100 deg

#

B ----> 15km -----> C on a bearing of 190 deg

silent plank
#

so yeh, construct a proper bearing diagram
and find the information needed by applying stuff like the sine and/or cosine laws

fast burrow
#

okay

#

so we know that triangle is right angled, right? how do you prove that? do you use what i learnt two years ago with co-interior and different types of angles adding up to 180deg?

silent plank
#

which triange are you referring to?

fast burrow
#

the one made up by the three points

silent plank
#

1 sec

fast burrow
#

okay

silent plank
#

you can conclude it from the bearing diagram

#

NS and WE axis are perpendicular

fast burrow
#

yes

silent plank
#

NS axes are parallel to each other
similar with EW axes

fast burrow
#

so you can use cointerior angles

silent plank
#

yes, that could be applied here

fast burrow
#

wow! thanks for your help

silent plank
#

note that if the angles weren't as nice, you would probably need to apply those laws stated

fast burrow
#

yes

#

like minutes and seconds

#

disgusting

silent plank
#

don't even need to involve minutes and seconds

#

eg if the bearing from B was 180Β° instead of 190Β°.

#

you won't get a right angle at B, and would involve more calculations

fast burrow
#

wow

#

thank you so much for your help!

#

appreciate it

unique junco
#

I do not know how radians work

#

could someone help?

dark sparrow
#

radians are just a unit of angle

#

there are 2Ο€ radians in a full circle

#

really all you need here is a calculator with a radian mode and an understanding of basic trigonometry

unique junco
#

well I would need to know what to press on that calculator

dark sparrow
#

are you familiar with the basics of trigonometry? what one might call "SOHCAHTOA", after the mnemonic central to it?

unique junco
#

Yes I am

dark sparrow
#

so is it clear that $d = \frac{16}{\cos(0.19)}$?

somber coyoteBOT
unique junco
#

Yes

dark sparrow
#

and you don't know how to evaluate cos(0.19) using your calculator?

#

if so then that is an issue with your lack of knowledge about your calculator and not the problem itself

unique junco
#

oh so ican uust plug in .19 radians into cos?

dark sparrow
#

how else do you think you would evaluate cos(0.19) if not by entering cos(0.19) into your calculator?

unique junco
#

I thought that I would have to do some more math to find what .19 was equal to

dark sparrow
#

what do you mean "find what 0.19 was equal to"

unique junco
#

in degress

dark sparrow
#

your calculator almost certainly has a radian mode

unique junco
#

it does, ive solved the problem now

dark sparrow
#

BUT, if you wanted to convert 0.19 radians to degrees, that's a matter of multiplying by the number of degrees in a radian

#

i.e. 180/pi

unique junco
#

0.19 times 180/pi?

dark sparrow
#

converting between radians and degrees is no different than converting between two units of the same physical quantity like feet and inches

#

yes that's what i said

unique junco
#

Cool, thanks

upper karma
#

Hei can i agsk a qestion?

cosmic pebbleBOT
#
Rule 1

The help channels are solely for help with math, so feel free to post your question. Asking whether you can ask a question or if anyone knows about some specific topic is unnecessary, so please try to avoid questions of that nature.

upper karma
#

Go with it

#

Ill take that as a yes?

#

Of course.

#

So the given information is two points, and the angle between them.

#

And I want to see if I can find out the point where the angle starts, the lengths of a, b, etc

#

Idk if its possible tho.

#

Maybe 2 points an angle is too little?

#

(So the actual points used to be (2.3, 0) and (-1.6, -1.4), but I added some numbers to make it harder since the original points give away length a)

#

So should be a = 2.3, and b = sqrt(4.52)

#

But yeah idk how i'd solve it just given information (5.8, 7.9) (4.2, 4.2) and 140 degrees

glad anvil
#

There's too little information. Remember your circle geometry? If you mark two points on the circle, and then draw lines from both those points to a 3rd point on the circle, the angle is the same no matter where the 3rd point is

upper karma
#

Yea, tho id see how that'd help?

glad anvil
#

Your intended solution is point C

#

But point D, or point E, or any other point on the circle also works

upper karma
#

Ah right yea

#

But idk how this could be used to find C, or AC or BC

glad anvil
#

True, it doesn't show a way to calculate the coordinates of the point

upper karma
#

I think linear algebra can probably be used to fill in the missing point, and solve for it.

#

Using cosine rule for dot product or something

glad anvil
#

Yea, I think that probably works

upper karma
#

Which was how I constructed the problem in the first place, so it feels a bit like cheating

glad anvil
#

xD

upper karma
#

AB, can be found really easily, so I was hoping there was some clean nice geometric solution

wraith drum
#

Hey peeps, I have a question, prove that sin(nx)/1+cos(nx)=tan(nx/2) for all natural values of "n"

#

i haven't tried complex analysis, but i'm scared it will get complicated

upper karma
#

we already proved this few days ago

dark sparrow
#

$\frac{\sin(nx)}{1} + \cos(nx) \neq \tan(nx/2)$

somber coyoteBOT
wraith drum
#

no

#

like (1+cos(nx))

dark sparrow
#

ah

#

is there a tax on parentheses where you're from?

wraith drum
#

i thought it would be obvious

#

but nvm

dark sparrow
#

it is not

wraith drum
#

sry

#

is there a tax on parentheses where you're from?
@dark sparrow 🀣

dark sparrow
#

well, i'd go with "are you allergic to parentheses" on any other day, but that would probably make you write sinnx / 1+cosnx = tannx/2 or something to that effect

wraith drum
#

@dark sparrow that spacing is bigger than my future

dark sparrow
#

it was exaggerated on purpose.

#

anyway, let ΞΈ = nx/2 and apply double angle identities on the left hand side

wraith drum
#

oh got it, thanks

dusky surge
#

@upper karma About your question. There is not enough information to find a and b. What I was taught in school is that you need at least 3 of the 6 information of a triangle, namely the length of the 3 sides, and the 3 angles, to find the remaining information.
I am not sure if this can help you.

upper karma
#

Right, so that question only gives 1 side and 1 angle, so its not enough. That makes sense

fluid moat
#

Hi

#

is ther e a place i can learn the trig functions in depth

#

i only really know 2 things

#

trig ratios

#

and this other thing on the calculator

#

im a nob

dark sparrow
#

khanacademy

upper karma
#

idk unit circle mebe?

fluid moat
#

ok

#

the algrebra 2 book i got isnt really that helpful

#

it just has questions

#

lol

#

ill use khan academy

#

thanks

supple onyx
#

I mean id probably serahc for a lot of practice questions

#

to really learn the identities

fluid moat
#

okay, thanks

quaint quarry
#

Find the midpoint of the segment that has endpoints at (a+b, a-b) and (a,b)

upper karma
#

Do you know the midpoint formula? @quaint quarry

#

Sure

wooden current
upper karma
#

Great got ghosted

#

πŸ‘»

#

Lmaooooooooo

graceful narwhal
#

😦

quaint quarry
#

Yeah

#

Sorry I was busy

#

X+X divided by 2 equals the x coordinate for midpoint

#

And just replace the x’s with y’s

upper karma
#

What

plucky marlin
upper karma
#

@quaint quarry i mean yeah but that's way too vague

#

Are you still here?

minor field
#

Again

#

πŸ˜”

brave drift
#

I am trying to prove that if the an n-sided convex polygon has at least one side parallel to x and at least one side parallel to y. Then, n is the multiple of 4.

dark sparrow
#

if you have two sides that are perpendicular to one another then some multiple of the external angle will be 90Β°

brave drift
#

if you have two sides that are perpendicular to one another then some multiple of the external angle will be 90Β°
@dark sparrow This is what I am unable to understand.

#

In order for one side to align to the vertical and another side to the horizontal, the sum of the exterior angles of some k consecutive sides must equal 90.

#

Why sum of the exterior angles of some k consecutive sides must be equal to 90?

dark sparrow
#

i could give you either an informal explanation of this fact or an alternative proof that isn't handwavy

brave drift
#

The one which will help me to solve some more similar questions would be the best.

dark sparrow
#

hhh

#

that's so vague

#

anyway w/e

upper karma
#

yus mission accomplished

I successfully proved law of cosines independently... I just had to look at a triangle for 10 minutes before being able to do anything. Aaaand my proof is more algebraic than geometric so yus

dark sparrow
#

take your pair of perpendicular sides

#

connect their midpoints to the center of the polygon

#

the resulting angle at the center will be 90Β° by assumption

#

but on the other hand, if you considered the angle subtended by one side at the center, that'd be (360/n)Β° bc your polygon is regular

#

ok i think it's time i made a picture

#

or not bc i'm lazy

brave drift
#

I will check that if (sum of exterior angles + 90) = 180 in this case. If it is then, I am happy to move on.

#

Proofs should be easy because they are just logic. ;_;

#

3x+x+90 = 180
So, 4x = 90. That is the sum of the exterior angles should be 90 degrees.

upper karma
#

Next up on my list of things to prove:: i have no idea whatsoever but I think perhaps Euler’s identity that e^pii = -1.

#

wait either that or binomial theorem...

#

Either seem reasonable

#

prove/construct real numbers and its arithmetic operations

#

its seems pretty reasonable

#

;^)

dark sparrow
#

@upper karma try e^ix = cos(x) + i sin(x)

unique junco
wooden current
#

What's the problem?

unique junco
versed river
#

I think tilde means "whats the problem you have" more specifically

unique junco
#

Oh ok

#

I honestly dont know what the specific problem is, I have absolutely no clue how 1 is the answer

silent plank
#

have you ever worked with radians before?

unique junco
#

Yes

somber coyoteBOT
silent plank
#

and do you know the ratios for trig functions of special angles?

unique junco
#

I definitly learned them, probably just forgetting what they are

silent plank
#

revise them

unique junco
#

like 2pi = 360 and stuff liek that?

silent plank
#

they're very common

unique junco
#

r u talking about the angles and radians of the trig circle?

silent plank
#

both

#

sin(0Β° ) = sin(0) = ?
sin(30Β°) = sin(pi/6) = ?
etc...

unique junco
#

Yea

silent plank
#

and the numerical value of something like
sin(pi/2) = sin(90Β°) is something you should definitely know

unique junco
#

Oooh so in the problem I posted the pi/2 was radians

#

I was trying to plug it in for opposite/hypoeneus

silent plank
#

plug what in for opp/hyp

unique junco
#

sin(o/h) sin(pi/2)

silent plank
#

oh no.

#

pi/2 is the angle

wooden current
#

If it's easier for you to think in terms of degrees, you can convert radians to degrees by multiplying the radians by 180/pi.

silent plank
#

and isn't the ratio of the opposite and the hypotenuse

arctic vortex
upper karma
#

same

arctic vortex
#

oh

dusky surge
#

Hello kurax

#

For number 2, can you find any real life situation that you'll have to use the scalene triangle?

#

Like can you find a real life object that is of triangular shape and it's useful for you?

#

@arctic vortex

arctic vortex
#

the flatiron building?

#

hmm

#

idk

dusky surge
#

that's a good example

#

Why does it need to be in triangular shape?

arctic vortex
#

a hanger?

#

idk

dusky surge
#

That's a good one too

arctic vortex
#

but its not scalene

dusky surge
#

Hmmm...

#

the flatiron building?
Why does it need to be in triangular shape?

arctic vortex
#

it said to do it in a scalene triangle shape

dusky surge
#

Okay, is the flatiron building a scalene triangle?

arctic vortex
#

no

#

i cant think of any examples

#

can u help me

dusky surge
#

Let's think together :)

#

Look around your room

#

See if there's anything triangular

arctic vortex
#

ok

#

no nothing triangular :(

dusky surge
#

Ouchy

#

How about a deformed hangerπŸ˜‚

upper karma
#

real life triangles are too regular 😦

dusky surge
#

Artificial stuff~

arctic vortex
#

yes

#

i cant find a scalene triangle

#

am i allowed to say deformed in a school assignment

dusky surge
#

If you can point out why a deformed one is useful, then yes

arctic vortex
#

ok then ill do deformed hanger

#

hmm or maybe ill say distorted hanger

dusky surge
#

Like if you have to hang different stuff, or need to use the hanger to do other things

silent plank
#

doorstop?

dusky surge
#

Oh, nice one

arctic vortex
#

oh yeah

#

how do i explain mathematically

#

sorry english isnt my first language

dusky surge
#

Do you recall the triangle inequality?

arctic vortex
#

yes

dusky surge
#

Use that

arctic vortex
#

sum of 2 angles must be greater than the third side?

dusky surge
#

Sum of 2 sides

arctic vortex
#

yea

dusky surge
#

Done?

arctic vortex
#

i still dont understand it :(

dusky surge
#

Ohhhh

#

Hint: use a ruler to measure all three sides

arctic vortex
#

oh ok

dusky surge
#

And then try to calculate all 3 situations of the triangle inequality

arctic vortex
#

how do i use a ruler in microsoft word

dusky surge
#

Hmm.....

#

Place the ruler on the screen, I do that when I am doing measuring myself before I print it out

arctic vortex
#

i dont have a ruler in real life :)

#

:(*

dusky surge
#

But make sure that the paper in the screen fits the paper in real life

#

Oh....

#

There's another method, use the insert line function, and draw a line directly on top of the given line of the triangle

#

Microsoft words would tell you the horizontal span and vertical span of the line. Use Pythagoras theorem to calculate the length of the line

arctic vortex
#

oh ok

#

wait how do i make it tell me

dusky surge
#

Double click your drawn line

arctic vortex
#

ok

dusky surge
#

It should show on the top right

arctic vortex
#

oh i see it

#

height: 0.02
width: 3,31

dusky surge
#

Yea, that's the dimension.

arctic vortex
#

ok

dusky surge
#

Now move it and reshape it till it fits your triangle

#

One side at a time.

arctic vortex
#

oh ok

dusky surge
#

Hmmm....

#

Do you know how to reshape your line so that it is exactly the same with one side, let's say 'a'

arctic vortex
#

yea

dusky surge
#

That's good!

arctic vortex
dusky surge
#

Yea, seems like it

arctic vortex
#

ok

dusky surge
#

Remember to jot down your results!

arctic vortex
dusky surge
#

Nice!

arctic vortex
#

ok so do i measure them?

dusky surge
#

Do you know Pythagoras theorem?

arctic vortex
#

pythagorean

#

?

dusky surge
#

Yea

arctic vortex
#

yeah i know that

dusky surge
#

Since height and width is given, you can use Pythagorean to solve the length by

arctic vortex
#

ok

dusky surge
#

$\sqrt{Height^2+Width^2}$

somber coyoteBOT
arctic vortex
#

ok

#

3.8825

#

is what i got for A

dusky surge
#

Please continue for b and c and mark down in your file 😁

arctic vortex
#

ok

#

THIS

#

this*

dusky surge
#

Did you take the square root?

arctic vortex
#

OH OOPS

dusky surge
#

Good! Remember for sides of triangles, we keep our letters in lowercase

#

a=1.97
b=2.9
c=3.92

arctic vortex
#

ok

#

what now?

dusky surge
#

Now we have to compare sum of 2 sides is larger than the remaining side

#

We have 3 cases

arctic vortex
#

thats true

#

everything is true

#

a + b > c

#

b + c > a

#

a + c > a

#

b*

dusky surge
#

Yea, you just have to type that into your document like

#

a + b = 1.97+2.9 = 4.87 which is bigger than c=3.92

arctic vortex
dusky surge
#

That's pretty good, but we still got to add in the numbers to 'show' it is really 'greater'

arctic vortex
#

o ok

#

i have to eat lunch now

dusky surge
#

Sure

arctic vortex
#

ill be back in like 10 minutes

#

tysm

dusky surge
#

See ya later~

arctic vortex
#

back @dusky surge

dusky surge
#

You're fast

arctic vortex
#

do i just say the formula

#

like how i used the formula

dusky surge
#

I think you'll have to use the formula

#

For the explanation part

arctic vortex
#

wait whats the difference betwen lines and angles?

dusky surge
#

Huge difference.

#

Basically they are not the same.

#

Have you ever heard of Law of sines?

arctic vortex
#

no

#

wait 1 second

#

im going to submit it

dusky surge
#

Let's see

#

It's not perfect I can say. There are some points that can be clarified.

arctic vortex
#

oh

#

what can be clarified

dusky surge
#

But it's good enough for an assessment I guess😁

arctic vortex
#

oh

dusky surge
#

Oh, you want me to point out or just submit?

arctic vortex
#

can u point it out pls?

dusky surge
#

Sure

#

For Q3, you might wanna do the addition for your teacher since this would truly show that you did the math.

arctic vortex
#

oh ok

dusky surge
#

the teacher wouldnt know you did the math if you don't write it down

arctic vortex
#

ok

#

i will do that

#

thanks!

#

can u also help me review for a test

#

"parallel lines intersected by a transversal"

dusky surge
#

Q4, the Pythagoras just help you find the length of the sides but but not the angles, so it's not right.

arctic vortex
#

oh

dusky surge
#

Angles should be marked with CAPITAL LETTERS like A,B,C. And sides should be in lowercase letters like a,b,c

#

Law of sines can be used to find the angles, but I am not sure if you have learnt that.

arctic vortex
#

oh

#

wait wahts the difference between angles and lnes?

dusky surge
#

can u also help me review for a test
And for this, I don't know if I can do it because I gonna sleep soonπŸ˜‚

#

Have you learnt 'sine'?

arctic vortex
#

no :(

#

and thats ok

dusky surge
#

You can use direct comparsion on the 3 angles to see which is the smallest

arctic vortex
#

oh

dusky surge
#

You can say, use fingers to 'measure' them as a tool of comparing

arctic vortex
#

wait so

#

is that what i say for 3)

#

for 4)*

dusky surge
#

Like making an angle with 2 fingers, and find that the smallest one the fingers will be closest together

arctic vortex
#

oh

dusky surge
#

That's one method of estimation for elemetary school

#

I am not sure what your teacher wants, but IMO it's something that you'll have to figure out.

#

Which you did use your understanding and concepts to tackle this problem, which is already better than most of the students

arctic vortex
#

rlly o wow

dusky surge
#

Just wanna say you did great. By asking, and by trying it out yourself.

arctic vortex
#

:D

#

ok i will submit it now

#

can i add u as a friend

dusky surge
#

Sure

arctic vortex
#

yay

upper karma
#

Thank you @dark sparrow for that sliver of info.

#

pretty straightforward proof.

#

now to prove that e^ix = cos(x) + isin(x)

upper karma
#

this is a normal equation, but I didn't understand what my teacher did

#

She subtracted 30 degrees from both sides.

#

$x+30-30=y-10-30 \ x = y-40$

somber coyoteBOT
upper karma
#

Why the y is after the equal sign?

#

?

#

What's the original problem?

#

I was taught that letters are before the equal sign

#

x is a letter?

#

When you're looking for the value of a "letter" or otherwise known as a variable.

#

You want to look for what that specific variable is equal to.

#

he isolated the variable x

#

So

#

Exactly. And that gave him the x value.

#

Alternatively, y=x+40.

#

Idk what the problem is asking for etc.

#

I didn't know that moving numbers between the first and second member counted how to isolate the variable, I thought that what counted how to isolate was to move another variable.

#

I understood it now

#

Sorry for my english, I'm using the translator for hard words XD

#

Nah it's fine.

#

How school level are you?

#

I'm 16 years old.

#

I'm 15

#

I turned 16 6 days ago KEKW

#

I am Nine year (1 year until high school

#

I did 15y yesterday lol

#

Ooo.

#

Nice.

#

Happy birthday lol.

#

I'm going to 11th grade in a few months.

#

After the summer is over.

#

Nice

#

u smart for a 16 yr old @upper karma

#

I dumb asf.

#

But pls clarify.

#

@upper karma

#

u be answering bare question with ease

#

and im pretty sure you answered some difficult questions before

#

But thanks lol.

#

i might be mixing u up with someone else tbh

#

LOL.

#

Thanks for the ego boost ~~and unboost sadotato ~~

#

im sorry fit the unboost 😦

#

nah but i have a feeling u be solving hard ass questions

upper karma
#

Awesome

upper karma
#

yo so is sin squred of lets say 5x plus cos squred of 5x equal to 1

versed river
#

sin^2(5x)+cos^2(5x)=1 yes

dark sparrow
#

"squred"

upper karma
#

Ok

pearl lava
silent plank
#

multiple applications of pythagoras and properties of addition

pearl lava
#

I got 28.9, is that correct?

silent plank
#

not what i'm getting. show work

paper vale
#

u only need one application, from projection of C onto side AD

#

it is arctan(6/14)

pearl lava
#

oh

#

i get it

#

thanks

silent plank
#

wait. sry misread the question

#

thought it was asking for CD,

#

so just one application of pythag,
properties of addition
and inverse trig

#

but still doesn't get 28.9 (Β°) for me

#

no, not 6/14

pearl lava
#

nvm I got 27.6

silent plank
#

yeh. looks good

#

,w arctan(6/(23- 9 - sqrt(6.5^2-6^2))) * 180Β°/pi

somber coyoteBOT
pearl lava
#

why is it multiplied by 180 degrees over pi?

silent plank
#

conversion to degrees
since the default output on wolfram is in radians

pearl lava
#

ok

silent plank
#

if your calc is already set in degrees, you don't need to

pearl lava
#

kk

upper karma
#

Hello, I was hoping someone could help explain how this is working?

I'm meant to find AC, but I have no idea why they're able to multiply both sides by sin(B)

#

why not?

#

what's wrong with multiplying both sides by sin(B)?

#

$b=a\frac{\sin(B)}{\sin(A)}=\frac{a\cdot\sin(B)}{\sin(A)}$

somber coyoteBOT
upper karma
#

But why? I don't get it

#

you multiply both sides by sin(B)

#

$\frac{b}{\sin(B)}=\frac{a}{\sin(A)}$ $\frac{b}{\sin(B)}\cdot\sin(B)=\frac{a}{\sin(A)}\cdot\sin(B)}$

somber coyoteBOT
warm basin
#

Sir zebra, do you know what the sign = exactly means?

#

or rather the word, Equality

upper karma
#

ofc, I just don't see how they're equal
It just says to do something without explaining why it works

warm basin
#

okay now listen

upper karma
#

?????

warm basin
#

let's say 5 = 5 ok?

#

if you multiply BOTH sides by 2

#

you would get 10 = 10

#

right?

#

So you see the equality still holds?

upper karma
warm basin
#

They're still equal to each other.

#

Both sides

#

This is the same thing that happens there.

#

if you multiply BOTH sides of the equality, the expression on the left will still be equal to the expression on the right

#

Do you get it now? or

upper karma
#

That's not the issue, it's a Khan Academy trigonometry thing I'm following and up until this point they've covered the stuff that's come up in the questions beforehand explaining why everything works the way it does. I got to this question and was stuck, I can see that they're equal but I don't know why.

warm basin
#

oh so its more of a figure thing?

upper karma
#

so you have never heard of law of sines?:

#

a/sin(A) = b/sin(B) = c/sin(C) I think
I don't see how

b = a(sin(B)/sin(A))

comes into it

#

you forgot the c/sin(C) part

#

and you multiply both sides by sin(B)

#

What? I just copied what was on the screenshot

#

I meant that you leave it in the bin

warm basin
#

(we dont need it)

#

$b=\frac{a\sin(B)}{\sin(Aο»Ώ)}$

somber coyoteBOT
warm basin
#

if we find b from here

#

we can plug it back in the equation to see if the sides are equal

#

$b = \frac{5\cdot\sin(108)}{\sin(31)}=9.23$

somber coyoteBOT
warm basin
#

$\frac{b}{\sin(B)}=\frac{9.23}{\sin(108)} = 9.7\
\frac{a}{\sin(A)}=\frac{5}{\sin(31)}=9.7$

somber coyoteBOT
warm basin
#

as you can see both give 9.7

#

i mean thats really just what law of sines says

#

the law of sines tells us that those will be equal to each other.

#

so you dont need to doubt it

upper karma
#

Thanks I guess
I'll sleep on it because I'm lost here

#

we are not getting your question

#

lmao

#

whats the question?

#

scroll up

#

it was an interesting discussion

#

i just skimmed thru it and damn i'm lost for words

nocturne dove
upper karma
#

It does fit here.

#

well if x + y + z = 180 then the angle BCD = angle x

#

and angle BAZ = angle y

#

@nocturne dove ^

#

^

#

You can develop loads of stuff from there

#

^

#

Lol

#

^

nocturne dove
#

aite thanks guys

upper karma
#

np

chrome lake
#

Hmmm

upper karma
#

Hmmm

sick rover
#

Can someone please tell me what my mistake is? The result should be 5dm2 but I got 6,9dm2

silent plank
#

triangle RPQ isn't a right triangle

#

and you can't use "pythagoras"

#

to get x

upper karma
#

I'll use a meme

silent plank
#

use the formula indicated above. (i.e. apply the cosine law)

upper karma
#

Pythagoras. Doesn't. Work. On. A. Non-right. Triangle

#

@upper karma

silent plank
#

also not a fan of using h_m and h_f to indicate the respective altitudes of your triangles.

#

wait 1 sec.

#

that formula looks questionable

#

either that and/or the diagram

sick rover
#

I guess the diagram
But like, Iβ€˜m not sure

Thatβ€˜s just what I got to work with

And thank you for helping me
My teacher didn’t answer my Mail with the question

silent plank
#

for the formula to be correct, the epsilon should be marked at angle RPQ

#

which takes quite a bit of effort to determine

upper karma
#

@upper karma ahahah

silent plank
#

also "general square"...

upper karma
sick rover
#

Sorry I translated it from German

#

I had to use google translator, Iβ€˜m not familiar with English math vocabulary at all

silent plank
#

the english term would be (convex) quadrilateral

sick rover
#

Uhh
Okay

silent plank
#

but as mentioned the formula/diagram arent consistent and/or wrong

sick rover
#

So, I should just not try to solve it and tell my teacher that itβ€˜s not solvable?

silent plank
#

technically its solvable. is that the original diagram as given?

sick rover
#

Yes

silent plank
#

to be consistent with the formula

#

epsilon should be here:

#

and you can determine possible values of that with the use of the sin law.

sick rover
#

Yeah well the diagram is given but I made the labels that arenβ€˜t black

silent plank
#

...

#

which was why i asked...

#

anyway,

sick rover
#

Sorry I thought that was clear because it stated that one should label the diagram

#

Okay so
When epsilon is there
What would I have to do then?

#

Because like
No matter where it is
It is given that itβ€˜s 32 degrees

And I calculated the Formular with that

silent plank
#

angle RQP is given as 32 but that isn't the angle you should be using to find x

sick rover
#

Okay, so the Formular itself is wrong?
Which one should I be using?

silent plank
#

the formula is fine with a correctly labelled diagram

#

you can first apply the sine law to determine possible values of angle QRP

sick rover
#

How do I do that?

silent plank
#

start with:

#

$\frac{\sin(\angle QRP)}{312mm} = \frac{\sin(32\deg)}{277mm}$

somber coyoteBOT
sick rover
#

Okay Iβ€˜ll try

#

Wait but wouldn’t according to that epsilon be at yet another place
Like
Where R is instead of P like you drew it

#

Or no
Sorry

#

I was getting sth wrong

#

Or am I
Now Iβ€˜m not sure anymore

#

Yeah
Like
When you take 312 which is f, the angle would have to be at R wouldn’t it?

silent plank
#

that is a bit unclear,
but the ratio of the sin of that angle (unambiguously referred to as angleQRP) and the side(f) is represented on the left side of the equation above

wraith drum
#

Guys, I'm having problems with a question. Let ABC be a triangle right-angled at B, If the opposite side to an angle "theta" has a length (x^2)-4 and the adjacent side to "theta" has a length 4x, then what will be the smallest value attainable by the ratio between the area of the triangle and sin(theta).

dark sparrow
#

have you made a diagram yet

wraith drum
#

tried it, but the ratio is a polynomial and the minimum value is negative infinity

dark sparrow
#

can you show me the polynomial?

#

also keep in mind that 4x and x^2 - 4 both have to be positive

wraith drum
#

oh damn

#

give me a min

#

the polynomial is 2x^3+8x

#

i got it...32 was the answer

finite vigil
#

i need help

#

on geometry

cosmic pebbleBOT
#
Rule 1

The help channels are solely for help with math, so feel free to post your question. Asking whether you can ask a question or if anyone knows about some specific topic is unnecessary, so please try to avoid questions of that nature.

upper karma
#

Ask :)

charred zephyr
#

show that cos(sin(tan(1))) = 1

#

degrees

upper karma
#

1 what

#

Ok

#

Use arcos on both sides

eternal crag
#

that is simply not true

upper karma
#

That's kinda spoiling

eternal crag
#

no it's not...

weary drift
#

,calc cos(sin(tan(1)))

somber coyoteBOT
#

Result:

0.54037772137207
silent plank
#

it being a show question implies that its true,
when its not one needs to point out there is likely and error with the problem

upper karma
#

is that in degrees though? @weary drift

weary drift
#

,calc cos(sin(tan(pi/180)))

somber coyoteBOT
#

Result:

0.9998476796922
silent plank
#

regardless of whether the argument of tan is in degrees or radians,
its still false

eternal crag
#

it is exactly approximately true

upper karma
#

That's unlucky

eternal crag
#

that was a copswing bait rokabe

charred zephyr
#

input it on your calculators with degree mode

eternal crag
#

calculator is not precise

upper karma
#

Neither is wolfram

eternal crag
#

wolfram is precise enough

upper karma
#

Mmmh

charred zephyr
#

then what should i do with the question

silent plank
#

can you show exactly how the question is being presented

eternal crag
#

problem: show that 1 = 2

#

what would you do with this question?

#

it doesn't make sense, just as the last one, you're asked to prove a false identity

upper karma
#

Apply (mod 0) both sides

charred zephyr
#

can you show exactly how the question is being presented
@silent plank
show that cos(sin(tan(1Β°))) = 1

silent plank
#

ok. that's definitely false

#

and whoever made that question should be reported

upper karma
#

Are you using Taylor's approx?

silent plank
#

if it were: $\cos(\sin(\tan({\color{red}{0}}))) = 1$ then it would be true. in which case you can simplify stuff from the inside.

somber coyoteBOT
charred zephyr
#

why should i report him

#

my teacher wrote this question

upper karma
#

Report him

charred zephyr
#

i mean it's just a math question

#

wtf what

upper karma
#

just a math question

silent plank
#

might be a bit of an exaggeration,
but if your teacher asked you to prove 1+1 = 3 (something trivially false)

#

would you be confident in their ability to teach math?

upper karma
#

A small mistake can crash a rocket into a planet

charred zephyr
#

but 1+1 is approximately equal to 3

upper karma
#

a large 2 is basically 3

charred zephyr
#

you can say 10 is approx equal to 20 just so you can know

eternal crag
#

just so you can know, that is incredibly dumb to say

charred zephyr
#

approximations are always true unless you put that weird sign

eternal crag
#

are you high or trolling now

charred zephyr
#

lol absolutely not

#

in the question the teacher gave cos(....) is approx equal to 1

#

so stop saying i should report him

eternal crag
#

cos(....) is approx equal to 1
that was never mentioned

silent plank
#

$=$ does NOT mean approximately equal to

somber coyoteBOT
charred zephyr
#

i know right

#

it's the ~ thing

silent plank
#

and when one writes =, one would assume it means equal to

charred zephyr
#

i know that

#

what's the relation

silent plank
#

or if you cant find a symbol for it, explicitly state it in words

charred zephyr
#

anybody help

#

can i use the tan = sin/cos

eternal crag
#

for what?

charred zephyr
#

for my question

#

substitute it

eternal crag
#

jesus fucking christ it's NOT A TRUE IDENTITY

silent plank
#

what class are you in and what are you allowed to use?

#

he backtracked and stated its meant to be $\approx$

somber coyoteBOT