#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 268 of 1
ok thank you so much
sure
yes
If it ever helps:
ℙ is the set of prime numbers.
{2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, ...}
ℕ is the set of natural numbers. It's all whole numbers from either 0 or 1.
{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ...}
or
{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ...}
ℤ is the set of integers
{..., -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ...}
ℚ is the set of rational numbers
ℝ is the set of real numbers
ℂ is the set of complex numbers
AMD:
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for details. (You may edit your message)
RoiKadmon:
$\mathbb{Thanks}$
AMD:
I need help deriving this
from this system of equations
im not sure where to start
Seems to me that once you express the sine as a function of the other terms, then you can use trigonometric identities to find tan as an expression of sin, and thus as an expression of the other terms.
Not sure whether this is precisely what you were looking for.
im not sure either, this is for physics
correct
Isolate for sin(theta)_1
what about the v
?
I can't read it, please take a clearer picture if you can
the greatest angle of elevation will occur when he is closest to the flagpole
to find the third angle, use supplementary angle rule, that is they add up to 180deg
once you find that, knowing the sum of the angles inside a triangle, you should be able to make an equation to solve for x
and once you have x, you can find y 🙂
let me know if you need more help from there
@drowsy marsh did that make sense? are you still having trouble?
180
yeah
and you know one of them is 80, another is x, and another is x-10
so you know
80+x+x-10 = 180
right?
so 55
45?
okay, feel free to ask if you need more help
well a regular pentagon can be broken up into 5 equal triangles
and since you have the distance OX and XD you can easily find the area of half of one of those triangles
Bruh dont you have ED?
it's 6 no??
yeah, but why would you use that
thats overcomplicating things
area of a triangle is b*h/2
mm, okay
h=OX, b=ED
just find the whole triangle then
it will be 12.39 right
good
???
basically same thing as last time
ten triangles this time 🙂
perimeter = 150, each side will be what?
then the apothem (line to the center) is 23.1
is 150 the total perimeter
so is each side 15??
so each will be 173.25
then times 10
so 1732.5
??
By the way, what you did initially actually works, Breylin.
Indeed, if you were to multiply the perimeter, P, by a, the apothem, and divide by two, you could expand P as the sum of the lengths of the sides of the polygon, and deduce that this is equal to the sum of the areas of the triangles, and therefore is equal to the area as a whole.
Here's a visual example, if it helps.
The lengths of the sides here are:
s1, s2, ..., s6
and we get that the area of the first triangle is:
s1 · a / 2
the second one is:
s2 · a / 2
...
and thus, we get the same area, as shown above.
That's cool, never learnt that myself. Or maybe I did and forgot.
@upper karma Thank U
Thanks @twilit zenith
This case is somewhat specific, but I still think it's a nice proof to see.
No problem, Roi's method is very neat too! Sorry for not catching that.
Pascal, u got a paypal - i send u over a dollar or two
ahaha no need for that!
thanks tho
my pleasure
yo send me a dollar or two
You can try to find the area of big circle and subtract area of little circle 🙂
i would but i don’t even know how to do that lol 😹
I got this correct, but the teacher guided me at the time. Was wondering if someone can help me with this question.
K
Are you familiar with the formula for
cos (α + ß)?
yes, but i think they usually go by U and A
As in cos (U + A)?
In this case, the formulas are:
cos (U + A) = cos (U) cos (A) - sin (U) sin (A)
cos (U - A) = cos (U) cos (A) + sin (U) sin (A)
From these formulas, one can find that:
sin (U) sin (A) = 0.5 (cos (U - A) - cos (U + A))
And why is that?
Let us try to plot the formulas for the sum and difference of angles under cosine to get to the left expression:
[I'll write it now. Please give me a minute.]
theres like a constant at the front tho
There you go.
I'll try to test it out. Thanks
Another quick question, this would be in quadrant 1 correct?
or 3?
First one, I believe.
Remember that cot Θ = 1 / tg Θ = cos Θ / sin Θ.
In this case, since both cot (Θ) and sin (Θ) are positive, then cos (Θ) is positive, too.
The 4 quads went, A(ll) S(tudents) T(take) C(alculus) although
Oh
Appreciate it. Thank you.
thats adorable
Here's a more visual way to memorize it.
Can someone check if this is right?
ill be saving that, thank you very much.
I had a question regarding identities.
tan(30-y)
I just want someone to tell me whether my answer is right or wrong.
I got, ((1/√ 3)-tan y) / ((1+(1/√ 3)tany)
That's correct. 😁
Thank yous. I feel accomplished, sorta :3
You should feel so. 😎
❤️
cos (α+ß) would equal to cos α cos ß / sin α sin ß
because they're reciprocals right?
I don't think so, unfortunately.
Do you know why it would be positive?
Are you referring to cos (α + ß), or to cos (α) cos (ß) / (sin (α) sin (ß))?
cos (α) cos (ß) / (sin (α) sin (ß))
If it's a long explanation, no need to stress, I could always ask my teacher tomorrow.
For this term to be positive (for simplicity, let's assume that sin (α) and sin (ß) are both non-zero, so the expression is defined)), then either none, two, or four of the terms must be positive.
For example: If we have α = ß = 45°, then all the terms are positive, and we get a positive quotient.
Not sure if that answers your question. 😅
It's not always positive, though. For example, if:
α = 45°, ß = 135°, then:
sin (α), cos (α), sin (ß) > 0
cos (ß) < 0
and so we have 3 terms which are positive, and thus the quotient is negative.
so these two would be practically identical if it were negative cos (α+ß), (cos α cos ß - sin α sin ß), or would it be positive (cos α cos ß + sin α sin ß)
that's what im stumped on.
Are you referring to when:
cos (α + ß) = cos (α - ß)?
It's just asking what the equations of sine would be.
As in sin (α + ß) and sin (α - ß)?
Sorry if I'm being slow with this. 😅
Youre great help, I'm just bad at wording things.
cos (α + ß) = cosα cosß (+/-) sinα sinß
Was wondering whether it was positive or negative, my assumption was positive although I'm having second thoughts
Ooh, I think I see what you mean now.
cos (α + ß) = cos (α) cos (ß) - sin (α) sin (ß)
cos (α - ß) = cos (α) cos (ß) + sin (α) sin (ß)
If you're unsure, I would recommend you take a numerical example.
Say: α = ß = 45°.
In this case, we get:
cos (α + ß) = cos (90°) = 0
on one hand and:
cos (α) cos (ß) - sin (α) sin (ß) =
0.5√2 · 0.5√2 - 0.5√2 · 0.5√2 = 0.5 - 0.5 = 0
on the other.
If you're interested regarding where the formula comes from, it's originally derived from the formula:
sin (α + ß) = sin (α) cos (ß) + cos (α) sin (ß)
as proven here.
,w expand cos(a+b)
That works too.
The formula for sin (α + ß) can be derived from cos (α + ß) and vice versa, assuming you remember at least one of them, so I'd focus on trying to remember at least one for any future exam you have, and if you get stuck, then try working it out with the other, if you don't remember.
I'm pretty sure I'll remember.
Hopefully
On second thought
Let me write it down.
Don't worry.
Even if you don't remember it today, I'm sure it'll sink in soon enough.
Writing things down generally is a good idea, though.
Practice is also a good way to remember, as Hmm suggests. 👍
Practice makes perfect.
no
only if u practice properly
if u practice w misconceptions you will be reinforcing them
make sure u got the right concept first
ok
ima head ouyu
out
Bye, have a great night.
one more question I need checked
hopefully i got it right
(-secθ / 1- cosθ) = (-1 - secθ / sin^2θ)
i calculated it out, and got
1-secθ / sin^2θ
Just to clarify: Are you trying to work out the expression, or solve the equation?
im verifying identities
for
(-secθ / 1- cosθ) = (-1 - secθ / sin^2θ)
I'll try asking a friend, have a great night.♡
Oh, don't worry, I'm working it out. I'll try to have it ready in a minute.
Take your time, no pressure it's just review. :>
This is what I got for the two of them.
I don't see a direct argument to go from one expression to the other, but I suppose that if you were to try to equate the two expressions in the bottom right of each segment, you'd get an equality that always holds true.
The squared threw me off a bit.
Thank you
Other than that, I can practically complete the rest of the review I just had some issues with the previous problems.
I hope you have a wonderful night.
or day, depending on your location
Thank you very much. Same to you. 🛏️ 🌙
@upper karma
Yeah
this is a low res pic and i am having trouble reading it
okay i guess i can work with just zooming in on it
whatever
alright, so back to your point of confusion
Okay, well
My point of confusion is that
I have never, ever in my life
Did trigonometry or geometry
Because I didn't do maths from year 8 to year 10
Now I am in Year 11, doing IB Maths HL and this is messing me up
So idk how my THOUGHT PROCESS
should be
Yes, I went in not even knowing algebraic manipulation.
okay so like yeah this is gonna be tough
I'd study for like 8 hours daily but moving on xd
Yeah it is
I don't know how to think
Not systemized at all
K
Yeah
in which the yellow lampshade is expressed as a difference of two circular sectors
I don't know what that means
The expression
"Difference of two circual sectors"
circular
i'm talking about this from a purely geometric standpoint
do you know what a circular sector is
I know what a sector is I guess
Wdym by circual sector
like, the region between two radii
of a circle
is what I know as a sector
yea
i guess i am calling circular sectors what you are calling just sectors
so... ok, so do you understand what i meant when i said
the yellow lampshade is expressed as a difference of two circular sectors
yeah
Aaaaaaaaaaaand the arcs subtend the same center
the circular sectors in question have the same angle, θ degrees
and their radii are R and r respectively
not quite
oh
it's best to do everything in one unit
in this case meters
(and hence square meters for area)
r+0.28
Yea
our goal for part a
will be to express the area of the lampshade in terms of theta and r
that's our long term goal and we will not jump to it immediately
I see
so since the lampshade is what's left of the big sector when the small sector is cut out
we know that the area of the lampshade is equal to the area of the big sector minus the area of the small sector
does that make sense
alright great
so now
do you know how to find the area of a sector given its radius and angle (in degrees)
$A = \frac{\theta}{360} \pi R^2 - \frac{\theta}{360} \pi r^2$
Ann:
yes
that is in fact what i was going to do next
$A = \frac{\theta}{360} \pi [(r + 0.28)^2 - r^2]$
Ann:
does this make sense to you
R^2 became (r+0.28)^2
(r + 0.28)^2
and then i factored πθ/360 out.
where did that go
Ohh
my bad I didn't even see the theta/360pi
at the start
Been awake for 3 days or so so I am missing a lot of details
alright... moving on
$(r + 0.28)^2 - r^2 = r^2 + 2 \cdot 0.28 \cdot r + 0.28^2 - r^2 \ = 0.28 \cdot 2r + 0.28^2$
Ann:
yes
yes, the purpose is simplification
$A = \frac{\theta}{360} \pi [0.28 \cdot 2r + 0.28 \cdot 0.28]$
Ann:
and now you can factor out 0.28 and you will arrive at exactly the formula they give
this is a matter of algebra really
the more algebra you do, the easier it becomes for you to see these sorts of things
no
btw, nice pfp ann
thank you
Isn't it true without ^2 ?
No. arccos(cos(720°)) = 0° as an example
No matter what you put into arccos, it only spits out angles from 0° to 180°
Oh oops thats probably not a very mathy term XD. When we were doing functions my teacher used vomit a lot. Like f eats up x and vomits up f(x) and g eats up f(x) and vomits out g(f(x)) a bit of a weird and kinda gross thought 

Can anyone help me with 10-20 question at 12:50 pm est today in geometry surface area and volume we could do call if you want thx.
u tryin' to cheat at an exam fam
nah
its not an exam
its hw
were given a random amount of questions and we have to do them starting at 12:50 but im confused on this chapter
so I came here maybe for some help
fair enough; don't have the time tho unfortunately, maybe someone else feels up to the task!
Ok I will be waiting for a reply from someone hopefully
Just send the questions here
hellow spamkin
And what's confusing you
surface area and volume
like the formulas
sometimes it will ask find lateral area
of a ceratin thing
im in 10th grade by the way
im doing like the basic geometry
Do you have some example questions you've been struggling with?
Perhaps I'll be able to clear up a thing or two.
lateral area i have to find with 4yd height and base of 3
A base of 3 meaning that the base is a square whose dimensions are 3 yards x 3 yards?
i just need the formulas for lateral area, surface area, and volume so I can hopefully pass my exams in the futre
yes 3 and 3
its a traingle
figure
To start, drawing the shape will usually give you a good intuition of what you're looking for. In this case, you need a square prism where the sides of the base are 3 yards and the height is 4 yards.
I see
On, wait, sorry, do you mean that the base is an equilateral triangle, that all the sides of which are 3 yards?
Here is the drawing.
Do you know what faces you need to calculate the area of in order to find the lateral area?
Yes! 😁 👍
You need to calculate the areas of all of the faces that "connect" the two bases. These are rectangles whose dimensions are 3 yards x 4 yards.
lateral area is 12?
Not just yet.
Keep in mind that this is the area of one face.
Not precisely.
Remember 2 things:
- The area of the triangles is different from that of the rectangles.
- You don't have to calculate the areas of the triangle bases, because they don't count towards the lateral surface area.
Sorry to ask the same question, but do you understand now which faces you need to use to calculate the lateral surface area?
May I color them in, just to be sure?
sure
There they are.
Those are the faces that connect the two triangular bases.
Exactly.
I'll rephrase:
You need to:
- Find all of the faces that connect the two bases.
- Calculate their areas.
- Sum them up together to calculate the lateral surface area.
And you're very welcome.
By the way, may I add one more thing before I leave you alone?
I hope you wouldn't mind.
Then I'd like to add:
-
Note that sometimes, the faces aren't rectangular. In this case, you'd need to use a different formula to calculate them, or try to "unroll" them in your head in order to get geometric shapes that you know how to calculate the area of.
-
Sometimes, there aren't 2 bases, but only 1. In this case, the lateral area will be anything except the base, much like last time, it was anything except the two bases.
Another example.
In this case, to calculate the lateral surface area of the cylinder, you can "unroll" the surrounding face of the cylinder into a rectangle whose length is the circumference of the bases - 2πr - and whose height is the height of the cylinder - h.
I think you're on the right track.
Keep in mind there could be multiple possible values for tan (x).
Do you know how to progress from here?
Do you know how to factor it?
You're on the right track, just to try to simply the left side so that it's written as two factors
I don't
ok
then, what is the greatest common factor between tan^3(x) and 3tan(x)
x?
why would it be tan(x) when there's a tan^3?
one sec ill write it out
...
we could let them do it
Thats what you would write anyways tho?
factor the apple
🙂
perfect
now switch back, what is apple equal to?
wait
no
inside the bracket
you should only have 3
because 3x 🍎 = 3 🍎 , what you have is 🍎X 3 🍎 = 3 🍎 ^2
Hope the apples didn't confuse you haha 😅
yes
so tan(x) = 0 or (tan^2(x) -3) = 0
👍🏿
and then can you solve for x from there?
I think so
Okay so you can't make the tan disappear there at the bottom :p
then square root of 🍎 ^2 = 🍎
so square root of tan^2(x) ?
tan(x)=sqrt(3)
Ann:
I have never written ±tan(x), but sure. Yes.
eaiser to just write ±3, I was getting there
hey guys just a very quick question please
will the ratio of that triangle be the same as the one for that angle?
what triangle
the one that i put a red mark on
how to know which inverse trigonometric functions are even and odd?
you google it.
looks good to me, so which of all the values you got fit into your domain?
The positive ones
The restriction is [0,2pi) so I assume that excludes any negative values
Yep
I also don't quite understand what you wrote there with x + pi/3 + pi(n)?
ah, you are trying to write it periodically
Yes
Okay so what are all the value of x? write them out
and 0
Got it
great!
looks good
what would a cross section formed by a plane intersecting a cube where the plane cuts off a corner of the cube look like
did you learn sine law?
@latent iron you need to use Law of Cosines
look it up
once you know 2 angles, it's easy to find the 3rd (since all angles from a triangle need to add up to 180 degrees)
^
Also can be done with trigonometry
But yeah whatever you choose to
wait law of sine and cosine isn't trig?
:/
🙂
wait law of sine and cosine isn't trig?
@rapid temple i meant trig definitons mb
How do I find all possible parabolas given a focus and a containing point (also need to find directrix)
Well it was for the first 2 hours I spent it on
Lmao
thats a tricky one
oh
Almost got it
Im not sure of the last step
In the last step you might want helpers
Hi
I solved that geometry problem
@latent iron you have to do this step a LOT of times on different triangles
Do you know the angle theorem which says that all the angles on a triangle sum up to 180? This is the theorem i used here
@upper karma post it to my dms or here
@tame berry these angles are identical:
all the angles for a triangle need to add up to 180
a line is 180 degrees
are you still with us, @tame berry ?
well?
I dont think so lmao
I hate when this happens
I hate it when ... yeah
Rude af
you beat me to it
?
Oh yeah
Lol
you typed it before I could hit enter
Lmao
Well
it's easy to find it
you just need to visualize the triangles
Yeah
@tame berry ok, so these two angles are 50, right?
any doubt why they're 50 degrees?
Nope
you see where I'm going with this?
Vertical angles right
That’s why it’s 50
And those angles are supplementary
Ya I’m with u my man
And then 3 angles of a triangle = 180
So that’s 40
@upper karma I understand
Since that’s 40
Oh wait
Mhmm
70 + 10 = 80
60 + 20 = 80
Isosceles triangle
Top angle is 20
@upper karma right?
yep
Yay
I’m currently taking geometry right now too
So I’m proud of myself
Trig is next year for me
Next school year
@tame berry Your welcome son
.
Ok, I’m here
@drifting parrot what do u need son?
that problem is evil
I’m waiting for @upper karma
do you know where i got the parts under then yellow and green?
those are the double angle identities
Ok
since we have sin(2x) and cos(2x)
Yes that’s very hard
I do not know that
So then the constants (1) cancel out
and we can factor out sinx
So sine and cosine both have a constant of 2 and that gets canceled out?
No that's the double angle, a constant is something like + 1, - 5, etc
these are our double angle formulas
and for the cos, it can be sometimes tricky to choose one since there are three
I choose the second one because then we have 1 - 2sin^2x -1 and 1-1 =0 so we get rid of those ones
and it is more simple
do you get that?
I’m rereading this
Ok. I still don’t get it 😣
hmm which part?
I choose the second one because then we have 1 - 2sin^2x -1 and 1-1 =0 so we get rid of those ones
@upper karma
I think so. I'm going to try to solve the problem and show you what I have once I'm done
Is it da third choice?
is this a test
Nah
This is someone else’s homework
\
Just wanna see for myself
If I’m right
mhm
That’s why I sent it as a link
And not my own picture
So is it,
Full circumference of a circle is 2 Pi r
yes
Half of a circle is Pi R
So Pi r divided by 10
Since it was cut into 20 segments
mhm
And half is 10 segments
So Pi r over 10
Right
@upper karma answer me
Ok
Thanks dudes
.
no problem
This is proof it wasn’t my homework
I just wanted to see if I was correct
For myself
no worries haha
👍
I think I was able to get it @upper karma
Yeah?
Sine(x) = 0
The second term, yes
Yes, tanx= sinx/cosx
Move -2sinx to the other side
Then divide by sqrt 3 and divide by 2
You get
Sqrt3/2 = Sinx/cosx
Sqrt3/2 =tanx
And then solve for when tanx if sqrt3/2
ramonov:
@drifting parrot
yes?
,rotate
no, 1 sec
@drifting parrot look, if its an equation it has to be true. And the only way that the equation...
$2sin(x)\cdot(\sqrt{3}cosx - sinx) =
0$
...is true is if either 2sin(x) is equal to 0, bc it'd be 0*(√3cosx - sinx) which is 0 and then its true
Or the fact that √3cos-sinx is equal to 0, bc it'd be 2sin(x)*0 which is 0 and then its true
Al3dium:
@CoraXSkull look, if its an equation it has to be true. And the only way that the equation...
$2sin(x)\cdot(\sqrt{3}cosx - sinx) =
0$
...is true is if either 2sin(x) is equal to 0, bc it'd be 0*(√3cosx - sinx) which is 0 and then its true
Or the fact that √3cos-sinx is equal to 0, bc it'd be 2sin(x)*0 which is 0 and then its true
There's no 2
Who you are referring to
Both of you
Idk i only took it to explain him the reason
You just have tanx=sqrt3
So x=pi/3
Exactly
Or x=60
But that is more elegant
I get that if it’s an equation, it has to be true but I need to know why in order to understand what I’m doing
But i thought what you needed to understand it was that
What do you need then to understand?
What I did wrong. I sent a picture of how I solved it, but I didn’t do it right
it looks like you didn't fix the mistake that was pointed out
$\sin(2x) \neq \sin(x)\cos(x)$
ramonov:
@silent plank but he didnt evaluate the 2sin(x)
This is what @upper karma showed me.
Yeah Pascal seems to be right
Can you explain what she did?
correctly manipulated:
sin(2x) to 2sin(x)cos(x)
instead if incorrectly replacing sin(2x) with sin(x)cos(x)
compared to what you did earlier
Then there would be a mistake
I didn’t know it was a mistake
ramonov:
Yes
when i first typed it?
Yes
Look, I’ve never done a problem like this before. I’m already frustrated with this problem as it is.
can you attempt it again with this updated information?
👍
it's good to memorize the more general identities
Sin(x+y) and cos (x+y)
since sin(2x) derived from that
you didn't sub properly
sin(2x) = 2sin(x)cos(x) right?
what should sqrt(3) * sin(2x) be?
2sin(x)cos(x)
*sqrt(3)
do you see the mistake now.
what have you tried so far
wait do i just pick from either hyp or adjacent?
i havent really tried anything ive been confused
is the distance between the tee and the hole the hypotenuse or a leg of the right triangle
the leg would be just the horizontal distance
the full distance from the tee to the hole is the hypotenuse
do you see why @south inlet
the hole is on the surface of the ground
sin 4a = 2 sin 2a cos 2a
Technically, you could write sin 3a = 2 sin 1.5a cos 1.5a but no one really does that much, but there is a triple angle formula
I need help with an online test
I have no clue how to do any of it I thought someone here could help
@upper karma me
Can I see
yep just a sec
@upper karma
I need help with an online test
@upper karma pretty sure you're not allowed to ask for help during an exam
@acoustic jungle
what
ok you got x=0 and pi, plug them back in to see if it's right.
also where did the 1 go.
$\arcsin(0)=0$, $\pi$ and $2\pi$
the one is gone because when I replaced cos(2x) with 1-2sin^2x, it canceled out the 1 that was part of the original equation.
Lσνιηg✧Sσνєяєιgη:
Lσνιηg✧Sσνєяєιgη:
Do I factor anything out?
No
Ok
May I give a small "hint"?
Any identities you can think of?
Sure
square them.
Tanx?
You got it, Cora. 👍
$\sqrt{3}=\frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)}=\tan(x) \implies $ basic$\angle=\arctan(\sqrt{3})=60^{o} \implies 1st: x=60^{o}$ or $180^{o}+60^{o}=240^{o}$
I think
Lσνιηg✧Sσνєяєιgη:
That's right.
Thanks for helping me @acoustic jungle
@drifting parrot thats what Pascal got lmao
lol
Hmm
In the very beginning
Can you think of any other methods to do this?
To find the tangent?
The other one is 4pi/3
To solve $\sqrt{3}\cos(x)-\sin(x)=0$
Lσνιηg✧Sσνєяєιgη:
He only got π/3
Thats what i saying
Ikr these things
Just saying he had the same thing as you
I found a chart that has all the tangent, cotangent.... values
That’s what I used
$\sqrt{3}\cos(x)-\sin(x)=2\cos(x+\frac{\pi}{6})=0 \implies x+\frac{\pi}{6}=\frac{\pi}{2}$ or $\frac{3\pi}{2} \iff x=\frac{\pi}{3}$ or $\frac{4\pi}{3}$
Lσνιηg✧Sσνєяєιgη:
Oooooooooo
Can anyone help me out? I’m stuck on a question
I figured out how to get the angle but I don’t know how to get the sides of the triangle
,rotate
A and b
Do you know about sine and cosine rule?
Yeah a bit
Try to apply that
$\frac{\sin(a)}{A}=\frac{\sin(b)}{B}=\frac{\sin(c)}{C}$ in a triangle
Ok I’m lost
Lσνιηg✧Sσνєяєιgη:
Use trig functions
You dk how to apply the formula I assume
Oh ya trig functions can
Omg
How do I do that?
sine=?
soh cah toa
$\sin(x)=\frac{opp}{hyp}$
Lσνιηg✧Sσνєяєιgη:
Watch video
I did I wanted half of youtube
@upper karma look video online
And couldn’t find a YouTube video
khan academy
Plenty of YouTube videos
There's alot
What did u type
Ya khan academy
That’s good too
But how do I find the adjacent and opposite if I only have the hypotenuse
use letters
Get x by itself
Use letters 👌
Cos = x/ hypotenuse
Multiply hypotenuse both sides
X = hypotenuse times Cos
Idk
I need some help knowing what SAS triangles are and how I'm supposed to use trig functios to solve them
that's where I'm lost
You know 2 sides and an angle between them
Sin(a)/Side A
but incorporating the sin and cos rules are where I get extra lost
= Sin(B)/Side B
and knowing whatthey are
Look online watch videos
Learning them by reading stuff isn’t the best choice
Watch some videos
@glad oak Or shall I just explain it to u
Do you mean proving that triangles are congruent, Elfthan?
Sin(a)/Side a = sin(b)/Side b
$\frac{\sin(a)}{A}=\frac{\sin(b)}{B}=\frac{\sin(c)}{C}$ in a triangle
𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫𒐫:
@glad oak
I think I'm like I'm missing several steps so imma watch a youtube vid thanks for the help
@upper karma your angles are wrong.
Why did you write 53+17=90
and b is not isosceles
law of sines
seems correct
okay thanks
that is wrong
ASS doesn't 100% prove congruency
that is why it's called ASS - disclaimer (not the actual reason)
@vital bough
yea that is
.......
