#geometry-and-trigonometry

1 messages · Page 257 of 1

wind heart
#

Or smth like that

#

Right?

silent plank
#

that description isn't very clear.
you reflected it over the y-axis just fine
just reflect what you have again except this time over x=6

wind heart
#

I kind of get it now, thanks! I’m not sure if I’m doing it the “best way” possible but the way I do it still gets me the answer now

#

I’m just counting each block until it gets to the line, and counting the same amount after the line

#

And then I plot it

viscid ginkgo
#

I got triangle JDH congruent to triangle DJK for #5 for reason HL

#

and #6 angle H is congruent to angle K because of CPCTC

tight relic
#

I have a slight problem, we have an excercise with pyramids and we this is all the information we have for it, not even height, is there any way to find out the height or is it just impossible ?

tight relic
#

nvm the teacher gave us height now

inland kiln
#

can someone give me answers for b and c

idle bloom
#

@inland kiln for part b use a trig ratio. One of the side lengths you know and you know the angle and the other side length is the radius

#

Part c use Pythagorean theorem

#

One side is r, the other is 14

#

And then the trick is the hypotenuse is r+10

inland kiln
#

oooooh

#

thanks @idle bloom

#

I got this now

idle bloom
#

👍

inland kiln
#

I need help on this one can someone walk me through it please?

flint osprey
#

can you find angle ADB?

idle bloom
#

ABC is a right angle

#

And then there's an isoceles triangle in there that you can take advantage of

jaunty crane
#

hey guys

#

i need help w 4 and 5

#

is the answer to 4 75 and 435?

silent plank
#

not quite
75 and 435 are coterminal with -285
however it seems you missed a solution

#

did you check whether 255 or -645 were coterminal?

flat jackal
#

As long as you can add any integer multiple of 360° to -285° and get to one of the angles in the list, then the angle is coterminal to -285°. Same for both 4 and 5, you can simply take the difference between the angles in the list and -285° (for 4) or 120° (for 5), and if the resulting angle is some multiple of 360°, it is coterminal to -285°/120°

upper karma
#

it's just anything that's -285 mod 360

#

which is basically 75 mod 360

#

for 5, it's anything 120 mod 360 or -240 mod 360

#

@jaunty crane

jaunty crane
#

@silent plank o is it also -645?

#

ty @flat jackal and @upper karma :-)

upper karma
#

yeah it is

jaunty crane
#

yay

upper karma
#

because -645 is a mod -285

#

-285-360

jaunty crane
#

ah i c

#

but 255 isnt right

storm dock
#

hello, so i received this maths assignment from my school and there is two question that is confusing me
first question is "indicate where the graphs of cot(x) and 1/tan(x) are different. if necessary, make the alterations by hand to your existing graph of y=1/tan(x)"
and the second question is "use the unit circle to explain why there is a difference between the 2 graphs"

#

i cant find any difference between them when i put it on desmos

onyx cloud
#

the definition of cot(x) is 1/tan(x) if im not mistaken

#

so it should be the same graph

storm dock
#

yes, thats im thinking

#

i dont know why teh question is asking me to explain the difference

onyx cloud
#

can you take a picture of it

storm dock
#

sure, give me a second

#

my upload speed is a bit trash

onyx cloud
#

dw

storm dock
#

there are 2 pages

#

@onyx cloud

onyx cloud
#

it says they are the same on the paper

#

so for this front part you can just draw the same graph twice i'd assume

storm dock
#

yeah thats fine

#

the 2nd page is what i dont get

onyx cloud
#

does it say "there is a difference" or "isn't"

storm dock
onyx cloud
#

c) nowhere

storm dock
#

i wouldve put that

#

but then question d comes and asks use the unit circle to explain the difference????

#

why there is a difference*

onyx cloud
#

can you send a picture of d)

storm dock
#

click the link

onyx cloud
#

it only shows c

storm dock
#

wait what

upper karma
onyx cloud
#

for the first one

#

you draw the line

#

and if the square is crossing it at any point

#

then that means that reflecting over it will cause it to land on itself

#

its asking which of those won't have that happen

#

second one no clue

upper karma
#

So what line does y=x draw

#

How can it get reflected over that

onyx cloud
#

y=x means that for every x, the y coordinate is that same number

#

so what line will it be

upper karma
#

A diagonal one with a slope of 1

onyx cloud
#

perfect

#

so reflecting over that line means that x -> -x and y -> -y

upper karma
#

So how are you supposed to reflect something if it’s overlapping

onyx cloud
#

you just switch up the coordinates like i said, in the case of y=x

upper karma
#

Why is it -x, -y

onyx cloud
#

not exactly sure how to explain it

#

its like drawing a perpendicular to the line from every point

#

nvm that explanation is bad

#

if you draw the line you'll see why

#

but i think they want visual analysis for this hw rather than actual mathematical analysis

upper karma
#

So for a, I draw a vertical line on x=5

onyx cloud
#

correct

#

and if you do that

#

does the square cross it?

upper karma
#

Wym

onyx cloud
#

is the line passing through the shape?

upper karma
#

No

onyx cloud
#

then that means that if you reflect it

#

there will be no overlapping

upper karma
#

Do that’s the answer?

onyx cloud
#

i'm assuming it is

compact spire
#

$\left(r,:\theta \right)=\left(4,:-60^{\circ }\right):to:\left(x,:y\right)$

somber coyoteBOT
compact spire
#

Can anyone help me with this question?

onyx cloud
#

do you know how to switch from polar to x and y

compact spire
#

not really no

onyx cloud
#

ok so

#

super quick

#

x=rcos(theta)

#

y=rsin(theta)

#

see if you can go from there

compact spire
#

Okay

#

so x = 4cos(-60)

#

y = 4sin(-60)

onyx cloud
#

yep

#

now you gotta solve

compact spire
#

$(2,-2\sqrt{3})$

somber coyoteBOT
compact spire
#

sweet

#

Thanks for the help 🙂

#

I only remembered how to go from x,y to r,theta

onyx cloud
#

ok

#

glad i could help 😄

compact spire
#

yeah thanks to you, I knocked out 4 problems lightning fast!

onyx cloud
#

nice@

#

!

compact spire
#

Convert to rectangular equations. $ r=4cos\theta$

somber coyoteBOT
compact spire
#

Okay is this similar to what I was just doing?

onyx cloud
#

yeah i believe so

#

so you find the parametrics which will be done through x=rcostheta

#

and y=rcostheta

#

then you can try and substitute to find an y(x) = ...

compact spire
#

so its not like the $x^2+y^2=r^2$?

somber coyoteBOT
compact spire
#

$x^2+y^2=4cos\theta$

somber coyoteBOT
onyx cloud
#

oh shoot

#

no yeah i think you're right

#

mb

compact spire
#

Okay, I didn't know if you had an alternate way of figuring it out

#

so how would I go about solving it like this?

onyx cloud
#

wait redo the r^2

compact spire
#

Is it wrong?

onyx cloud
#

r = 4costheta

#

so what does r^2 equal

compact spire
#

Oh

#

$x^2+y^2=(4cos\theta)^2$

somber coyoteBOT
onyx cloud
#

yeah

compact spire
#

I honestly don't remember what its supposed to equal to

onyx cloud
#

as in, you don't know the answer?

somber coyoteBOT
compact spire
#

$(4cos\theta)(4cos\theta)$

somber coyoteBOT
compact spire
#

$16cos^2(\theta)$

somber coyoteBOT
compact spire
#

that would be it correct?

onyx cloud
#

that is (4costheta)^2

#

if that's what you're asking

compact spire
#

Okay yeah thats what im asking, but Im just going to be square rooting all this I think anyway

chrome sedge
#

Need help finding x

#

Dont mind instructions it just asks x

upper karma
#

$1+1

#

lol

dark sparrow
#

if you wanna fuck around with the bot, go to #bots.

rich wolf
#

@chrome sedge what does it say

#

Actually cant help you without the instructions because there is no information on figure 2

worldly whale
#

can someone help me find cofunctions

#

i just want to know how to enter them into my calculator

#

if i wanted to find the cosecant of 83 would i do 1/sin(83) or sin^-1(83)

dark sparrow
#

1/sin(83)

worldly whale
#

thanks

tiny halo
#

dont understand at all

paper mauve
#

@tiny halo tell me, what are we given here? in terms of the lines. are they tangents, etc.?

tiny halo
#

im given that X = 8

paper mauve
#

ok perhaps my question wasnt worded correctly

#

what types of lines are these

#

@tiny halo

tiny halo
#

secants?

paper mauve
#

yes

#

and how do you find the length of a secant line?

tiny halo
#

ummm.... idk

#

i struggle in mat

#

math

paper mauve
#

so the length of a secant line can be found by HJ*HK (in this example)

#

its the length of shorter segment times the length of the longer segment

tiny halo
#

so hj times kj ?

paper mauve
#

no

tiny halo
#

im so cinfused this is my last question for my lesson and i dont know how to do this

paper mauve
#

its hj times hk

tiny halo
#

oh

paper mauve
#

yeah you were close

#

so we know x=8

tiny halo
#

yes

paper mauve
#

so what is the length of hj?

tiny halo
#

11 or 3x

paper mauve
#

not quite

#

i asked for HJ

tiny halo
#

oh

#

8

paper mauve
#

good

#

and what is the length of HK?

tiny halo
#

11

paper mauve
#

beautiful

#

so the length of a secant line is the smaller line times the bigger line

tiny halo
#

oh

paper mauve
#

so that makes this 8*11

tiny halo
#

88

paper mauve
#

and since the two secant lines have the same origin (H) we can make this whole thing secant line1=secant line2

#

so secant line 1 length is HJ times HK and we found thats 88

#

so 88= secant line 2

#

now we have to find secant line 2

tiny halo
#

yeah

paper mauve
#

so what is the smaller line's length on the second part

tiny halo
#

hg

paper mauve
#

good

#

what is hg's length

tiny halo
#

3

paper mauve
#

good

#

what would the larger line be?

tiny halo
#

fg

#

fg = y

paper mauve
#

not fg

broken mantle
#

Anyone knows some kind of way?

tiny halo
#

fh?

paper mauve
#

youre close but its not fg. you are right that fg=y

#

bingo!

broken mantle
#

sorry to interrupt 😐

paper mauve
#

@broken mantle not to worry

tiny halo
#

yes]

paper mauve
#

i will take a look at your q in a sec we will be done in a min

#

so what is length of HF?

tiny halo
#

3y?

paper mauve
#

not quite

#

the values are right

#

but the operation is off

#

we want the total length of this

tiny halo
#

just so i dont have to keep on scrolling

paper mauve
#

all good

tiny halo
#

3?

paper mauve
#

nope

#

thats hg

#

you were right that 3 and y are in it

#

just the operation is off

tiny halo
#

is it 8

paper mauve
#

no

#

its 3+y

tiny halo
#

bruh

paper mauve
#

the length of HF is 3+y

tiny halo
#

i had that in my head but i thought it was wrong

paper mauve
#

never be afraid to say whats in your mind we are all friendly here. we are fellow students

#

we dont bite. we are friendly

tiny halo
#

ok thanks

paper mauve
#

so now we have our long length, 3+y, and we have our short length, 3

#

just like the first part, multiply these two together

#

3*(3+y)

#

=________??

tiny halo
#

3

paper mauve
#

what?

#

3(3+y)=__

tiny halo
#

9 + 3y

paper mauve
#

good

tiny halo
#

then you divide by 3 on both sides

paper mauve
#

yep!

#

cause now its just 88=9+3y

tiny halo
#

subtract 9 from 88

#

?

paper mauve
#

just make sure you write out your steps when solving this and explain them to yourself so then that way when this sort of problem comes back up you can kick its butt

#

yes

tiny halo
#

i got 26.33

paper mauve
#

that should be it

tiny halo
#

so hk is 11

#

y is 3

#

hf is 26.33

#

cuz i need to find those three

paper mauve
#

i havent run the numbers but the process is right so im sure youre right

tiny halo
#

so those are the answers to those three

paper mauve
#

good job!

#

@broken mantle still need help?

tiny halo
broken mantle
#

yes @paper mauve

tiny halo
#

is this 270

broken mantle
#

no

tiny halo
#

what is it

broken mantle
tiny halo
#

😦

paper mauve
#

so in order to make 20 dots total we can make the dots into an assembly of 4 rows of 5

broken mantle
#

@tiny halo its 45 degrees

#

how do i figure out an assembly

#

for any given number of dots

paper mauve
#

so think of it like an area

#

we want an area of 20 dots

broken mantle
#

i think i got an idea

paper mauve
#

do tell

broken mantle
#

rectangle area = 30*12

#

so for this example ill use numbers

#

thats 360 i think

#

we have 20 dots

#

divide 360 by 20 to get 18

#

18 is the area that each dot should get

#

i place it in the centre of that area

paper mauve
#

what is "it"

broken mantle
#

dot

paper mauve
#

kk

#

continue

broken mantle
#

iterate for each next dot by incrementing distance over its area length

paper mauve
#

well how do you know the area length?

broken mantle
#

i dont 😐

paper mauve
#

even then im not entirely sure if that would pan out correctly

#

because area is units^2

broken mantle
#

it doesnt have to be perfectly distanced from eachother

paper mauve
#

so unless you assumed the spacing between dots are square i cant think of a way that this could work

broken mantle
#

i can imagine smaller areas like shrinked big rectangles and calculate their sides by
dividing a side by dot amount or so

paper mauve
#

you just gave me an idea

broken mantle
#

cause im shrinking big rectangle by number of dots as well

paper mauve
#

ok so have you seen area described as a grid before?

broken mantle
#

that sounds strange to me but im sure ill understand

paper mauve
broken mantle
#

okay

#

i would imagine coordinates there but this works too

paper mauve
#

so if we do the same thing to our case and place a dot at every intersection between the x and y coordinate lines

broken mantle
#

my area =/= number of dots

paper mauve
#

hm yeah youre right

broken mantle
#

it would mean i would need to iterate

#

by area/dots

#

instead of 1

paper mauve
#

so what if we were to just scale everything

broken mantle
#

wait area/dots wont work, how do we scale?

paper mauve
#

well what if we were to instead place dots at the center of each grid

#

this giving 20 dots

#

thus*

#

and then find the coordinate distances between each dot?

broken mantle
#

in my case grid would have 360 cells

#

i need to place 20 dots

paper mauve
#

well we can split the entirety into 20 cells

broken mantle
#

tell me how and ill take care of the rest from that point

#

it can be easy to say 4x5, but what if grid rectangle is 8916x98524 and we need 56543 dots?

paper mauve
#

maybe my wording was off here. im not trying to replace dots with area. im trying to split the entire area into smaller areas

#

and use those as the foundations for each independent dot

broken mantle
#

that would work for me as well

tiny halo
#

@paper mauve are u guys still working?

paper mauve
#

if we were to continue adding dots we will end with 20

#

yes we are

broken mantle
#

but how do u figure out that grid should be 4 by 5?

paper mauve
#

well its a rectangle

#

and we need 20 dots to be evenly spaced

broken mantle
#

but how do you generalize it?

paper mauve
#

just by splitting it up so that we can incrementally add in a new rectangle each time without throwing off the space

#

so we can split the lengths into increments

#

we dont even have to do this as 4x5

#

i can do this as 2x10

#

imagine youre putting decor on a wall

broken mantle
#

yeah, but as i mentioned these solutions are very computation intense

paper mauve
#

not at all

#

its just simple scaling

#

so in this example if we split up 30 into 2, we get 15 feet of width. if we split 12 into 10, we get 1.2 feet of length each time

broken mantle
#

first i would need to factor out all solutions that factor number of points with an error of maybe +/- 2 and then find the permutation that has the best scale of small width/big width and same with height if you follow my thoughts here

paper mauve
#

except you dont need to

#

have an error

#

**

#

its a symmetrical shape

broken mantle
#

if i get a rectangle with dimensions 789982x687422 and need to fit 320074 dots

#

that is why i either need to generalize of find solutions in some kind of other way

#

another idea was to create a physics simulation where each dot and border have a same charge(like electron or proton) and they repel eachother to perfectly spaced distances, but this would be too extreme

#

there must be a generalized mathematical way for it

paper mauve
#

then you can do it as 2 rows of 160,037 dots starting from a space 4.93 for each legnth and 343711 in width

#

ok so heres what i did if you want general:

  1. decide your spacing pattern (2 by 160,037)
  2. divide the number of rows you want by the length (687422 by 2)
  3. divide the number of columns you want (789... by 160...)
  4. take both the dimensions in step 2 and 3 and divide by 2 to find the center of each rectangle
#
  1. place dot
torpid torrent
#

can i use slant height with a hexagonal pyramid's volume

#

i forgot

#

i thought only way was base1/3height

broken mantle
#

Will try to @paper mauve

paper mauve
#

@torpid torrent wym slant height?

#

like the total height?

torpid torrent
#

im confused on radical form

#

where do radicals come into this

paper mauve
#

itll come from the area of the base

#

so i think youre overthinking dis

#

volume of a basic shape is lxhxw

#

lxh=base

#

basexh=volume

#

find the area of the base first

#

then you can multiply by height

#

but be aware that its a pyramid so its 1/3xbasexheight

torpid torrent
#

but theres no radicals

paper mauve
#

its a 30 60 90 triangle

#

youre gonna have a root 3 in there

torpid torrent
#

oh shit

#

i was doing trig

upper karma
#

Okay so, supposing that ABC is an obtusangle triangle; calculate the area of EBC, knowing that the area of ABC is 24

#

What i got

#

We know that

A(ABC) = A(EBC)+A(ECX)+A(AEX)

And
A(AEX) = (aH)/2
A(ECX) = (ah)/2

And by the theorem of tales:

h/H = B / (B+a)
Some simplification:
a = H/2h

We substitute in the initial equation, the areas with their values/equations:

24 = 6h/H + H²/4h + H/4

Remove denominator:

24Hh + H²h + H²h - 94Hh = 0

-70Hh + 2H²h = 0

Hh(-70+2h) = 0

#

And im stuck here

#

And please note that my drawing is far from being on scale, the first one is on scale

lilac isle
#

I’m working on finding the volume shell of an rectangular and wonder if anyone can help check my work if they correct?

upper karma
#

I dont understand your letter @lilac isle

#

And you gave little context, is that all you got? Not even a drawing?

viscid ginkgo
#

How can I prove line segments EG and KJ are parallel?

#

Since there's no transversal lines, I can't say that there are alternate interior angles that are congruent.

#

nvm I see now that intersection can mean just lying on the other line

wintry mural
#

Hello. Can you please give me a good reference/textbook for studying solid mensuration/geometry? A book with lots of problem sets and exercises is preferable. I only have elementary knowledge on the volume of solids such as sphere, cone, cylinder, cube, and so on. Please @ me. Thanks! Have a good day.

silk musk
#

How do I find the distance between two circles given only the circumference? Work my way back yo the radius, then find the difference in the radii?

#

#2

plain pollen
#

well, you know the circumfrence, of the first circle, so you can find the circumfrence of the second one too

#

using the original circumfrence, you can find the diameter of the first omne

#

then using the second circumfrence, find the second diameter

#

Then get the difference between the two

#

Or did I misinterpret the problem?

silk musk
#

There is one rope allegedly "wrapped tightly around the equator." So I assume it is just the circumference of 132,000,000. Given the 6 feet of additional rope, second circumference would be 132,000,006, I suppose.

plain pollen
#

correct

silk musk
#

But why would I need the diameter instead of the radius?

#

If I am trying to find the distance from one point on Earth to the rope.

plain pollen
#

well, yeah radius would be better

#

my bad

silk musk
#

Aight, thanks for the help. Was stumped on it for like, 20 mins.

plain pollen
#

knowing they radiate from the same point, subtracting the firsst from the second gives the difference

#

anytime

eternal crag
#

do you still need hlpe @plain pollen

plain pollen
#

yes please @eternal crag

eternal crag
#

alright, let's do a) first

#

you're given that y = -2, yeah?

urban oxide
#

cos2x-3sinx=4 I got that it doesn't have real solutions.

#

but the exercise says that it's supposed to have one

#

I wrote cos2x as 1-2sin^2x

eternal crag
#

you don't actually need any uhh substitution

#

and yes it doesn't have real solutions

#

cos(2x) is at most 1
-3sin(x) is at most 3

#

so the only chance that they'll sum up to 4 is that their peak happens at the same time

#

show that that is not possible and you're done

urban oxide
#

yeah i was confused cause it said that it should have

#

tysm

flint osprey
#

did you copy the question correctly?

eternal crag
#

yeah good point^

urban oxide
#

i checked again

#

it's correct

flint osprey
#

maybe in the solution they found a point with cos(2x) - 3*sin(x) = -4

urban oxide
#

It says

#

if the solution of the equation is a*pi/2 who is a

plain pollen
#

@eternal crag sorry I was doing smth else, are you still here?

eternal crag
#

yes i am

#

shall we continue?

#

so i was saying,

you're given that y = -2, yeah?

#

i'm not going to reply you incase you come back again, this is the second time you ghosted me

urban oxide
#

I got another problem

#

sin4x=2/(n-1)

#

It says how many n natural numbers are there so that the equation doesnt have real solutions

#

i thought first one would be 1

#

2 and 0

rich wolf
#

@urban oxide sin^4(x) or sin(4x)??

urban oxide
#

sin(4x)

olive plover
#

is creating a picture through equations in desmos fun

paper mauve
#

@olive plover fun is subjective. Some people are capable of doing it and have fun doing it, others not so much. Personally I have no clue how to work desmos

upper karma
#

how do i find the fundamental frequency of the superposition of two sinusoids
and btw they arent harmonics

slate phoenix
mellow vector
#

@slate phoenix Though it's just physically, you can use Thales Theorem :)

severe flare
#

"R" the radius of the circle ?

mellow vector
#

I think so

slate phoenix
#

@mellow vector how would you use thales's theorem? It doesn't seem quite obvious

mellow vector
#

With the right angles

#

I am not that knowledgeable, just happened to watch a video about that and thought it's perfect timing.

#

You can find the center of a circle with it,

#

But only physically.

vagrant owl
#

hey red

mellow vector
#

Hello

vagrant owl
#

is there someone on here that can help me with trig

rich wolf
#

@vagrant owl just ask

slate phoenix
#

Oh, I want to

rich wolf
#

Same

eager pendant
#

@slate phoenix nice problem, where’d you find it?

#

I got a solution just involving angle chasing

olive plover
#

is -1/(x+2)+5 a rational function

rich wolf
#

yeah

visual mist
hollow finch
#

Sure

#

Just find the sum of the two angles that make up angle ABC

visual mist
#

wdym?

hollow finch
#

It's made of an equilateral triangle and an isosceles triangle right

visual mist
#

ye

hollow finch
#

Oh uh, one of the angles of the isosceles triangle and one of the angles of the equilateral triangle makes up angle ABC right?

visual mist
#

ohh

#

i get it now

hollow finch
#

Ya, just find those two angles and add them up

visual mist
#

so the angles in the equilateral is 60

hollow finch
#

Yes

visual mist
#

so angle abc would be 30

#

because 90-60 is 30

#

no

#

wrong angle

hollow finch
#

You need to prove that angle ABC is 90 degrees

#

Uh... ok, what is the sum of the angles that make up a straight line

visual mist
#

180

hollow finch
#

So what the large angle of the isosceles triangle

visual mist
#

uh 120?

hollow finch
#

Yes

#

So what is one of the smaller angles

visual mist
#

60

hollow finch
#

No

visual mist
#

oh

#

wait 30

#

i thought u meant something else

hollow finch
#

Yes

#

It's ok

#

Ok ok, so 30+60=?

visual mist
#

90

hollow finch
#

That's it

visual mist
#

oh okay

#

thankq

hollow finch
#

Np

visual mist
#

but like when you meant one of the smaller angles do u mean of the eqailateral one or isoceles

hollow finch
#

The isosceles

visual mist
#

why would 60+30 prove that

hollow finch
#

Wait, i'll show you

visual mist
#

okay

#

oh do u mean like one the angles of the equilateral and one angle from the isosceles add up to 90?

hollow finch
visual mist
#

yes

hollow finch
#

So what are the two angles that make up ABC

#

30° and 60°, you add the two together, you make 90°. Therefore, angle ABC=90°

visual mist
#

oh ye

hollow finch
#

That's it

visual mist
#

okay thanks

hollow finch
#

You understand?

#

Np

visual mist
#

i get it

hollow finch
#

Ok ok good

visual mist
#

i have another problem that im not sure how to do it would you mind helping me again? sorry lol

hollow finch
#

Sure

#

Send ah

visual mist
hollow finch
#

let angle COD=x and let angle AOB=y

#

What is the sum of angles on a straight line

visual mist
#

180

hollow finch
#

What are the angles that are on the line

visual mist
#

EOD, DOC,C0B and BOA

hollow finch
#

Ya

#

Write those angles in terms of x and y

visual mist
#

wdym?

hollow finch
#

let angle COD=x and let angle AOB=y use this substitution

visual mist
#

y,y,x,x?

hollow finch
#

Yes

#

y,y,x,x

#

So 2y+2x=180

visual mist
#

ohhh

hollow finch
#

y+x=90

visual mist
#

wow

#

so smart

#

thanks

hollow finch
#

Thank you

#

angle DOB= angle BOC+ angle COD

#

=x+y

#

So angle DOB=90

visual mist
#

okay

hollow finch
#

You understand?

visual mist
#

yes very much

#

u make everything so clear B)

hollow finch
#

Ya, geometry is to use your eyes and the laws of geometry

#

So can see everything from one image

#

Just need to help you look in the right direction

visual mist
#

yep

#

anyways thank you so muchh

hollow finch
#

Np

quick hull
#

can anyone tell me how to find the intercepted arc without knowing the intercepted angle

rich wolf
#

@quick hull what do you know

quick hull
ashen karma
#

So u know rhe angle

#

@quick hull

#

(0.27)2pie r

quick hull
#

wait huh? i haven’t learned this yet, we were supposed to learn it this quarter but can’t go to school

golden panther
#

Guys i want to know how to do cos5theta=3/4; 0<theta<2pi

#

thank u🙏

surreal bolt
#

um ... arccos(3/4)/5 + n(2pi/5)?

golden panther
#

wow

surreal bolt
#

sorry kinda busy with something eles 🙂

#

I must go.

golden panther
#

Wth

upper karma
#

Wait

#

Nvm

#

Yeah

#

Is this is a true thing?

#

Then it would be $beta=90-frac{alfa}{2}$

quick hull
#

can some help me out

upper karma
#

@quick hull ill try but can you try mine

quick hull
#

@upper karma i’m not very good at geometry

upper karma
#

Shit

#

Okay ill try with yours

#

That 50 is from inside right?

quick hull
#

the 50 is the inscribed arc

#

my school has me doing Q4 shit and we haven’t learned it

upper karma
#

I mean

#

That 50 is the angle of the inside

#

Arc

#

Yeah right

#

?

quick hull
#

inscribed*

upper karma
#

Okau

#

Wait

#

Omg i did it

#

I was expecting it to be harder xD

#

@quick hull

#

Lemme take a pic

#

Do you know why or i explain?

#

@quick hull

#

Emmm

#

Hello?

upper karma
#

Is this true?

#

It is, isnt it?

rich wolf
#

that is true. the proposition doesn't make sense however because it implies that alpha is negative

#

because theta is clearly greater than 90

upper karma
#

Yeah it was ramdom example

#

Thanks

quick hull
#

@upper karma yeah sorry i figures it out but you were right

#

can someone help me out?

#

shit that’s blurry

rich wolf
#

dude you know on a macbook

#

you can take a screenshot right?

humble pebble
#

@quick hull late but it's 95

#

oh wait i might be wrong lmao

quick hull
#

@rich wolf dude i’m not on discord on my macbook

humble pebble
#

what does subtends mean

quick hull
#

@humble pebble i got it thanks though

humble pebble
#

just download discord on ur mac

#

@quick hull

quick hull
#

i have it

humble pebble
#

lmao

#

ok

quick hull
#

just easier to use on my phone

humble pebble
#

coo

frail vigil
#

sorry for the fucked up drawing

#

i need to find the dot's geometrical space

#

geometric*

#

i did many things and i am getting stuck

#

e and c and have the same y value

#

so i tried e(Ex,Ey)

#

and then c(0,Ey)

#

then the dot in the middle is p

#

so p(x,y)

#

and tried to get to

#

Ex= and Ey=

#

so i could put in ab line

upper karma
#

were you given any information about point E?

#

@frail vigil

frail vigil
#

no

#

only that ec is parallel to x

rich wolf
#

@frail vigil find the length of ab

frail vigil
#

10

#

how would it help me

#

ec/bo= ae/ab?

rich wolf
#

Yes

frail vigil
#

Ex/8=ae/10

#

i still have to use pitagoras on ae

#

but it's not the way

#

i need to do

#

Ex= Ey=

#

through the middle dot

#

and then put it in ab lline

#

doing ae= is 10-sqrt(6-Ey)^@+Ex^2)

#

not @ , 2

rich wolf
#

Prove oce = ace

frail vigil
#

i cannot prove it

#

that's the point of geomatric place

#

you are talking about something else

runic pasture
#

Hey ! I have this problem and I can't resolve it, their is some highest common factor in it :

B is a box in the shape of a straight paving stone of height L, with a square base on side l, where l and L are
non-zero natural numbers such as l < L.
We want to fill box B with identical cubes where the edge a is a non-zero integer.
(the cubes must completely fill box B without leaving any empty space).

In this question, the volume of box B is v = 77,760.
We know that, to fill box B, the largest possible value for a is 12.
Show that there are exactly two possible boxes B, the dimensions of which will be given.

So I started doing things but i don't know if it will be useful : the volume of the cube is 12^3 = 1 728 so we in B we have 77 760 / 1 728 = 45 cubes and.... i'm blocked, help !

native parrot
#

anybody reccomend any websites?

#

for trig help/review?

#

I failed my 'intro to trig' test so i wanted to take this covid break as some time to learn everything properly

#

@ me if you can help :)

weak ember
#

khanacademy does all of this

#

and he goes to pretty advanced topics. just go through his entire course, you should learn a lot

fickle light
#

Hey can someone please help me with finding the volume of a complex shape

upper karma
#

Sure

#

Gimme a question and I’ll help you through it.

#

(Assuming you understand the properties of imaginary and complex numbers, this should be pretty simple.)

dapper comet
#

what is it called when you find the greatest line segment in a group of lines

#

you do this by taking the point at the end of the line segment

#

and its slope

#

m(y) + x

#

not sure what this is called tho?

prime ledge
onyx cloud
#

@prime ledge the diagonals of a parallelogram intersect at their midpoints

prime ledge
#

ohh

onyx cloud
#

if thats not enough lmk but give it a shot

prime ledge
#

ok

#

thank you

boreal narwhal
#

Can anyone help me with my geometry transformations homework?

onyx cloud
#

shoot

boreal narwhal
onyx cloud
#

where are you stuck

boreal narwhal
#

For starters, Did I do number 1 right?

onyx cloud
#

right off the bat it says to show coordinates for all transformations

#

so im guessing no

boreal narwhal
#

oh i didnt see that

onyx cloud
#

the answer looks right to me though

boreal narwhal
#

ok

brisk orbit
#

hi i got a task for my homework can someone help me

#

its to construct a triangl with b+c the angel in a and the height from c

#

im bad ik

ashen karma
#

Yeaj ..there are tons of people to help u here

high zephyr
#

feel free to just post the question, no need to ask if u can be helped

rich wolf
#

B+C=(BB+BC)/B

upper karma
#

hey how can i solve this

dark sparrow
#

by knowing that any tangent line to a circle is perpendicular to the radius drawn to the point of tangency

upper karma
#

Thanks

devout harbor
#

You can use sin(51) = DE / 18

bronze geyser
#

with this new e-learning i'm going to be super active..

tiny halo
#

Is my answer correct

supple wedge
#

,w calculate sin 22

somber coyoteBOT
supple wedge
#

guess so @tiny halo

tiny halo
#

Do you know how to do this

dark sparrow
#

do you know what "geometric mean" means

tiny halo
#

No

dark sparrow
tiny halo
#

Ok I get it

#

Is this trig

sinful plover
eager kraken
#

Can anyone help me solve through this?
I think the Sin's are
9/25
3/5
I am not sure however how to solve the tan functions for these kinda of problems.

surreal bolt
#

what's sin(x + y)?

eager kraken
#

sin(x)cos(y)+sin(x)cos(y)

dark sparrow
eager kraken
#

wait do I just add 9/25 and 3/5?

dark sparrow
#

no

eager kraken
#

it was confusing when they gave me a sin now it's got 2 cos's

dark sparrow
#

... wait where do you even get 9/25 from

#

but no sin(s+t) ≠ sin(s) + sin(t)

#

and you also didn't answer pestamist's question correctly

eager kraken
#

9/25 is from sin^2=1-(-64/289)^2

dark sparrow
#

you're being incredibly sloppy

eager kraken
#

sin(x)cos(y)-sin(x)cos(y)
is the corrected six(x+y) then?

dark sparrow
#

no, it is not

#

read what you're writing

#

you've just written 0

idle bloom
#

What happened to the y's?

eager kraken
dark sparrow
#

when asked what sin(x+y) is, you answered

sin(x)cos(x)+sin(x)cos(x)

#

do you not see the issue in your answer

eager kraken
#

yes

#

i see

#

i obv meant the second x to be y's

dark sparrow
#

no

idle bloom
#

It's not obvious

dark sparrow
#

that's no excuse

#

it's not obvious to anyone here whether you really meant y - and where you meant y and not x - or you actually didn't know until it was pointed out to you

#

and in any case, the numbers you blurted out (9/25 and 3/5) are not even the correct values for sin(s) or sin(t).

eager kraken
#

im glad we got that out of the way

dark sparrow
#

so it would REALLY HELP if you showed your work

#

so that i could tell you exactly where you messed up

#

(of course, that's only possible if your work is clear and comprehensible)

eager kraken
#

I will ask someone else for the time being

tiny halo
#

How do you this I’m confused

ashen karma
#

Neartest 10 means 9 becomes 10

#

8 goes to 10 ..is it??

dark sparrow
#

@ashen karma nearest tenth != nearest ten

tiny halo
#

Can you explain to me what I have to do

eager kraken
wind heart
#

Ummmm I’m kind of confused with this project I was assigned

#

It’s so weird

#

So, we’re supposed to use our prior knowledge of ratios, proportions and similar triangles to solve these problems. We’re supposed to use real world objects and not measure them and some how put them into a proportion to figure out the length. I’m really confused. How and the world could I get the height of a tree that I didn’t measure using my shadow and the trees shadow?

tiny halo
#

Can someone help me with a question

upper karma
#

Someone

#

Help

#

Help

#

Help

#

Plz

#

Plz

#

Plz

#

Plz

#

Help

fierce pebble
#

@upper karma

#

what question?

smoky lark
#

@upper karma u gonna answer back

#

smh

upper karma
#

Sorry

fierce pebble
#

lol

upper karma
#

I was watching hype house drama hahaha

fierce pebble
#

bruh

upper karma
fierce pebble
#

use cosine

#

3sqrt3cos60 = x

#

wait no im stupid

#

cos 60 = 3sqrt3 / x

#

cause cos(angle) = adjacent / hypotenuse

smoky lark
#

OR U CAN USE THE 30-60-90 thing

upper karma
#

Ok ill try that

smoky lark
#

3 √3 times 2

#

👀

fierce pebble
#

I completely forgot about that stuff lol

#

I always just use a calculator 😛

ocean light
#

Omg I’m not on the timer no more

#

Was sup guys I know I’m late

wind heart
#

<@&286206848099549185>

rich wolf
#

What do you want

tiny halo
rich wolf
#

The geometric mean of $n$ numbers is calculated by the $n$th root of their product

somber coyoteBOT
upper karma
#

I need some assistance

rich wolf
#

@upper karma draw a horizontal line that goes through B

#

And call the point where the line intersects line DA point P

upper karma
#

Yeah figured it out

#

Thanks computer processor company

rich wolf
#

Nice

novel yacht
#

Hi, I have a few questions can someone help me

onyx cloud
#

just ask

novel yacht
#

How do i solve 64^5x+2=8 with no calculator

#

using logorithms i believe

onyx cloud
#

first things first simplify it one step further

#

its a very simple thing

novel yacht
#

how do I do that?

onyx cloud
#

can you subtract something from both sides?

rich wolf
#

Wait what do you mean by that

novel yacht
#

oh subtract 8

#

right?

rich wolf
#

$64^{5x+2}=8$

somber coyoteBOT
onyx cloud
#

oh

#

i see

rich wolf
#

Or $64^{5x}+2=8$

somber coyoteBOT
novel yacht
#

wait huh

rich wolf
#

Very different problems

#

Which one do you mean

novel yacht
#

the top one is correct

#

so 64^(5x+2)=8

rich wolf
#

Take log base 64 of both sides

novel yacht
#

what does that look like

#

idk how to do that

unborn jacinth
#

wait why is that given 3 sides of a triangle, the law of cosines gives you an answer in terms of degrees

#

is it possible to manipulate the law a little bit so it gives it in radians

#

(I know you can covert but I'm trying to understand it better)

novel yacht
#

You would need to change your calculator

onyx cloud
#

the answer can be in radians or degrees

#

it doesn't matter, like you said you can convert

unborn jacinth
#

so I would just change my calculator mode to radians?

novel yacht
#

@onyx cloud can you help with my problem the other dude dipped

onyx cloud
#

yep

#

oh sure

novel yacht
#

it was the top one he posted by the way

onyx cloud
#

so

#

start with this

#

2^x = 4

#

can you do log base 2 of both sides?

#

would you know what that looks like?

novel yacht
#

Idk what that would look like

unborn jacinth
#

(x = logbase2(4))

onyx cloud
#

yup

novel yacht
#

so what is my while first equation then?

onyx cloud
#

?

novel yacht
#

oh whoops

#

so what am I left with after doing logbase2 of both sides

#

is it what @unborn jacinth said?

unborn jacinth
#

yeah wait which question are you working on?

#

I see the one with 5x+2

#

as the exponent

novel yacht
#

$64^{5x+2}=8$

somber coyoteBOT
unborn jacinth
#

ok

novel yacht
#

yes

rich wolf
#

Ok

#

Take log base 64 of both sides

unborn jacinth
#

then 5x + 2 = logbase64(8)

acoustic jungle
#

log 8 would work too right

unborn jacinth
#

yes

acoustic jungle
#

k

unborn jacinth
#

but

rich wolf
#

Its easier to do this way

#

Less steps

unborn jacinth
#

yeah bc otherwise you'll have log on both sides still

novel yacht
#

Ok so after taking log64 from both sides what do i do

#

well whats my equation

unborn jacinth
#

actually

#

logbase 64 (8) means something to the power of 64 = 8

rich wolf
#

$5x+2=\log_{64}(8)$

somber coyoteBOT
unborn jacinth
#

so thats 1/2 correct?

acoustic jungle
#

yes

unborn jacinth
#

now you have a regular equation

#

5x+2 = 1/2

rich wolf
#

Dude dont do the problem for him

unborn jacinth
#

oops

novel yacht
#

lol its fine

rich wolf
#

How's he supposed to learn how to do it himself if you just solve it for him

novel yacht
#

can u just expain how u simplified the logbase64(8)

rich wolf
#

Of course

unborn jacinth
#

yes

acoustic jungle
#

64^what=8

#

64^1/x = xth root64

novel yacht
#

ohhh i see

weary drift
#

you can alternatively do a change of base

unborn jacinth
#

(srry for bad image quality)

#

but I think that should help you understand the different ways of writing a log function

weary drift
#

$\log_{64}(8)=\frac{\log_8(8)}{\log_8(64)}=\frac12$

somber coyoteBOT
acoustic jungle
#

That is smart

unborn jacinth
#

that is another way to do it that uses change of base

novel yacht
#

Oh wth

unborn jacinth
#

@novel yacht does that help?

weary drift
#

you can alternatively do a change of base

novel yacht
#

Yee i got it now

weary drift
#

i did just say it so

#

you never know when change of base can be useful

unborn jacinth
#

ok sorry for accidently solving it

#

😬

novel yacht
#

4^-6=x^3

acoustic jungle
#

also if you logged 8 instead of 64 on both sides it's good to know log k^x = x log k

novel yacht
#

how do i do this one without a calc

#

4^-6=x^3

weary drift
#

for future reference
$$\log_b(a)\equiv\tfrac{\log_c(a)}{\log_c(b)}$$
for any values of $a,b,c$ that make sense to plug in

somber coyoteBOT
unborn jacinth
#

@novel yacht what does a negative exponent mean

#

1/x

#

what is x in your case

acoustic jungle
#

yes I know how

#

Try logging both sides by a number

novel yacht
#

1/6

unborn jacinth
#

is it?

acoustic jungle
#

no -6 is 1/x^6

#

that is 6th root

novel yacht
#

wait huh

acoustic jungle
#

x^-n = 1/x^n

unborn jacinth
#

a^-b

acoustic jungle
#

x^1/n = nth root x

unborn jacinth
#

is 1/(a^b)

acoustic jungle
#

I think you learn this in grade 10

#

I learned it in grade 10

novel yacht
#

I am in grade 10

acoustic jungle
#

yes did you learn it?

novel yacht
#

Not whatever u guys just said

acoustic jungle
#

I had it last semester I'm sure it's in the Canadian curriculum

novel yacht
#

Im not canadian idk

acoustic jungle
#

o

novel yacht
#

ok restart

acoustic jungle
#

it's exponent rules

novel yacht
#

isnt a -6 exponent 1/6?

acoustic jungle
#

nono

novel yacht
#

what is it

acoustic jungle
#

search up exponent rules that will help you and I also told you above

#

FishraiderToday at 8:08 PM
x^-n = 1/x^n
MeHereToday at 8:08 PM
a^-b
FishraiderToday at 8:08 PM
x^1/n = nth root x

novel yacht
#

would it be 1/x^6?

acoustic jungle
#

that's right

novel yacht
#

oh okay

#

so then what

acoustic jungle
#

oh you're trying to solve the problem?

#

Try logging both sides by a number

novel yacht
#

trying to solve for x yeah

acoustic jungle
#

and use the rule log k^n = nlogk

novel yacht
#

ur gonna have to show me that idk what that is

#

i missed over a week of school before coronacation so thats probably why I didnt learn this

acoustic jungle
#

You should try some easier problems first or look over the log rules

#

and you don't learn logarithmetics in grade 10

#

we were learnig parabolas and completing the square

novel yacht
#

Oh we did that a while ago

acoustic jungle
#

Unless you are from china or india or something

novel yacht
#

lol nah america

upper karma
rich wolf
#

@upper karma angle addition formula?

upper karma
#

@rich wolf that's the first step yeah..

#

Cos(2alpha)=sin(theta)+cos(2theta)

#

This is what that leads to