#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 255 of 1
b = (6 6 0) and BT = (-3 -3 8)
(6 6 0) + 1/4 (-3 -3 8) = (5.25 5.25 2)
So P = (5.25; 5.25; 2) ?
sup guys
i have not done trig since my freshmen year of highschool, so this is easy sin cosine and tangnt stuff, can someone help me refresh my memory?
i need help wish basics basics.
but thanks. In triangle ABC, let AB = 34.1, LaTeX: m\angle A:=:62^\circm ∠ A = 62 ∘, and AC = 31.8. Find the area of the triangle. <-- thats a problem i need help with then ill remmeber everything
if someone could add me/ help me id be greatly appreciated!
Anyone?
find BC
then the area is easy
m²
if cm² there
so cm.cm
/2
because a triangle is a square
/2
@hexed kraken @hallow rose
Random pings?
you said "anyone"
Does an unchanging, infinite series like this converge and if so at what value?
No
N/𝔄:
If you have a sequence whose members are gonna be the summands of your infinite sum and this infinite sum converges, then this sequence must converge to 0
That means no constant sequence other than the sequence that is 0 everywhere is allowed there
Ahh right, it doesn't diverge either though right?
If it does not converge it diverges
Got it, ty
@hot pumice think about it
you're infinitely adding up 11/12
all converging series at some point you add up stuff that tends to zero
Now just cause your terms tend to zero it doesn't mean you converge
but if your terms don't tend you zero you definitely diverge
Have an upcoming test and me and my friend are working through revision books etc. we had this one question which we thought we had the answer and yet the answer in the booklet had something completely different hoping you guys could help?
A box in the shape of a square prism has a base 12 cm by 12 cm and is 40 cm tall. Find to the nearest whole number:
a) the length of the longest diagonal ( we got this right, and the booklet matched)
b) the angle the longest diagonal makes with the base (This we think we have right, didn't match the book)
what are your answers first?
I'd probably use atan2 on ba, then bd, then subtract one from the other.
@old ferry I highly suggest drawing it then placing in all the numbers you know, then working from there
you also know each of the three angles of ABC is 60 degrees (It's an equilateral triangle)
I find that finding all of the angles that I can at the time, even if they don't help me in the end, can be helpful.
Here's something to get you started:
BCD=6
CBD=12
BDC=180-BCD-CBD -> 162
Knowing CBD, we can also know ABD - it's just 60-CBD -> 48
i did all those, but didnt progress after that
@turbid garden you won't be able to solve something like this just using simple angle chasing
Oh 
I mean you'd use that to start out
@old ferry try trig
trigonometric form of ceva's theorem didnt get me anywhere
What happened when you tried atan2?
with ceva you'd have to extend those lines and that seems a bit unwieldy
I'm curious why it would've failed. It might help me to know.
this is wack
Is there a channel for tri dimensional geometry
dunno but it'd probably go here
i've just solved it
... what year of hs is this
3rd
Wait multiple years of geometry?
not the US
yay nice construction
most of these types of problems involve some type of construction then some cyclic quad / similarity: what not
or you can draw the diagram accurately, get the angle using a protractor and verify that it’s right (ceva would work)
I want a circle between 0,0 and 1,1. what is the equation

no im serious
I need this for something I'm working on
what equation or system of equations or whatever
what do you mean by "between (0,0) and (1,1)"
do you want the segment joining those points to be its diameter?
or do you want one to be the center? or just an arbitrary circle that passes through those points?
@upper karma
@split geyser @dark sparrow I mean that its centered between those points, and the edges go to the edges of the square between those points
yes
Hey, could someone help me with some problems?
@dark sparrow this is what it does. thank you.
hey guys, does a dice become less equal as if its not a cube?
usually yea
classifying the symmetry can someone explain what that means
is just the rotational and reflections
yea just those
im trying to express in words have a cube has 24 symmetrie
but I don't know how without just copying someone online
i can describe it with an actual cube though
im trying to express in words have a cube has 24 symmetrie
@quick otter i mean 48
uhh I'd just say it's fully decided by the orientation of the top face
so like you have 1-6, 4 rotations around the top, and a mirrored version, giving 6*4*2=48
so does a cube have 24 rotations, and 24 reflections?
Hello.
is
sin5*cos25+sin25*cos5
sin(5+25)=sin(30)=1/2?
Just wanted to check, not sure if it was correct or not
Yes, in angles
and that is multiplication
Sorry, that made no real sense
I know about the formula
sin(a+b) =sina*cosb+sinb*cosa
you are telling me you know the formula sin(a+b) = sin(a)cos(b) + sin(b)cos(a), and are asking if it remains correct if you insert a = 5 and b = 25
of course it does lmao
Okay, good, just wanted to be sure
The exercise itself is quite easy, just scared me because there are 10 of those xd
How would I work out for 0 <x < 360 degrees:
3sinx = 4cosx
what have you tried?
trial and error
thanks
can anyone help me complete this online test?
#❓how-to-get-help rule #6
no help on tests
what have you learned that'll help you solve this
go use that
you're going to have to set up equations properly
set up equations here and there
and then see if that get's you anywhere
👌
Is this so far looking right?
Oh shoot I forget 1/2
Oh wait
I set up a better equation
Not quite sure what to do next
Ohh
Turn sin2ø to 2sincos
you used the incorrect substitution
Oh
but yes, apply the double angle identity after fixing those
i'll bite
what's giving you trouble here
(but also don't multipost)
(i've deleted your post in #help-0)
define "these problems"?
do you know how to solve basic trigonometric equations, i.e. ones of the form sin(x) = a, cos(x) = a or tan(x) = a?
Yeah, but with the intervals, I do not.
where a is a constant
ok wait
if your problem didn't say "on the interval [0, 2π)", would you be able to do it
Nope, lol. The interval thing is complicating me.
no, that's not what i'm asking you
Would I have to crunch it down with identities?
if you were just asked to solve $\sin\paren{\frac{\pi}{6} + x} + \sin\paren{\frac{\pi}{6} - x} = \frac{1}{2}$ without any mention of an interval to solve on, would you be able to do it?
Uhw hat
Ann:
there we go
Like I mentioned above, I am not able to.
and yet you said immediately afterwards that "the interval thing was complicating you", making it seem as if the interval was the issue
I require step-to-step assistance on that matter.
Yeah, it's making me more confused.
and if there WASN'T an interval, you would still be unable to do the problem?
did i get that right?
is that a way for you to say "fuck off, i wanted a quick answer and you refused to provide and i don't want your help anymore you idiot"
it just makes your own life harder, later on
oof
if they were too easy then you should've been able to solve it without wasting much time anyways
the server isn't for asking aid for graded tests or papers anyways
i probs wouldn't enjoy it per se, but I did do those stuff
and maybe unbeknownst to me it helped me gain confidence in those basic stuff
Find the exact value of tan Θ , given that Sin Θ = 1/2, and Θ is in quadrant 2.
$$-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{3}$$
DeadEye:
yup
idk if this is the correct place to put it so if this is the wrong place please show me where to ask.
We got a task to create this graph which went fine
but then we were asked to read the crossing points of h with the x axis which i think was okay
however, the next task was to calculate the crossing points of h with the x axis
i dont know how to do that
i can send you the entire thing but its in norwegian and i tried to translate as well as i could
????
b) read the crossing points of h with the x axis
c) calculate the crossing points of h with the x axis
what is the difference between read and calculate here?
Thats what i dont understand
Is this something special in norwegian polynomials?
well read is just to look at it and see where it is
calculate is to calculate the point
that does make sense
i mean in a) they ask you to graph the function i guess
yes
maybe first it wants you to find crossong points by drawing
well yeah just look at the graph
and in the next one they want you to calculate it
Okay well i already drew it
and made a value sheet
but i dont know what the meaning of calculating the crossing point is
equate it to 0 and solve
can you give me an example?
do you know how to solve a quadratic equation of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0
do this here by equating h(x) = 0
at crossing point with x axis, the y values will be 0
uhh i dont think i understand
h(x) = 0
left hand side of equation becomes 0 at crossing point
put a 0 on LHS and solve it
would be much easier and faster if you factorize it
quadratic formula looks overkill here
-x^2 -4x + 5 = 0
I hope you understand why I did that
the points at which any graph crosses the x axis are the points whose y value will be 0. Here y value for any point is h(x). Any point A on this graph has coordinates (x,h(x)). Any point B that is a crossing point on the x axis has coordinates (x,0)
Just imagine h(x) as y
are you asking me how to solve this?
i guess so?
hmm, I must ask you what grade are you in
upper secondary school first grade in norway
did your teacher show you how to solve equations of this type?
if you are uncomfortable with factorizing, you can use the quadratic formula. However, I would highly advise you learn how to factorize since that is a useful trick in maths in general
Yeah he did a week ago but we were supposed to go more in depth this week however due to the corona virus, there was no more school except for this homeschool type
well first thing you should do is multiply both sides with -1 to make the coefficient of the 2nd degree variable positive
yes
now
you need to break down 4x into a sum of two numbers
but the two numbers must be factors of 5
do you know what a factor is?
We have different terms in norwegian but would it be 4= 2^2?
i dont know
what two numbers can you multiply to get 5
1 and 5?
yes, there you go, those are called factors of 5
okay
now
4x = -x + 5x
replace 4x with that
hopefully you are able to proceed from that point
4x is not a factor of 5
we are breaking down 4x into a sum of numbers
4x can be written as a sum of any two numbers
but 4x = 1000x - 996x doesn't really make sense here now does it
However 4x = -x + 5x does make sense here because you have two numbers who share something common with the left and right hand side numbers
I think you should wait for your teacher to explain this to you in more detail
No point in rushing like this without proper explanation
okay well i think you helped me atleast a little bit
Would the quardratic formula work here aswell?
even if it is overkill
of course but how do you know the quadratic formula but not factorizing?
no i know factorizing
but we have different terms in norwegian
so i was confused
thats all
I see
try to do by factorizing. Always look for the easy way out
that is literally how maths developed
people got tired of using lengthy formulas
so they looked for shortcuts and better ways
Cool. I liked your way by factorizing but i couldnt really wrap my head around it i think
@deft sleet quadratic formula works everywhere
I remember my teacher told us a step by step procedure for factorizing when I was your age
obviously I don't remeber it now
if u can factorize factorize it
It's now muscle memory
imo quadratic formula is last resort
Well thanks for the help and showing me other ways :D. I'll try to do my task now
good luck
Can you explain with the equation that was given? @ionic bluff
what eq?
@deft sleet multiply the coefficient of x^2 with the last number in your equation
this one?
x^2+4x-5=0
factors of 1*5
which is plus or minus 1, 5
add to equal 4
so plus 5, minus 1
(x+5)(x-1)
I think some exercises in factorization would clarify this to you
The graph gave -5 and +1
yes
yes that is correct
no harm in practice
true
build up that muscle memory in your hand and your confidence
okay but shouldnt it be (x-5)(x+1) to fit the graph?
I suggest you ask your teacher
(x+a) is a negative root
(x-a) is a positive root
has your teacher explained all of this before?
8
yeah we had all this (a+b)^2 stuff but i dont understand what you guys are getting at
x^2+x-5x-5
x^2-4x-5?
no that's fine actually
(x-5)(x+1) = 0
what are the values of x in the above?
how will you find the value of x then?
uhm
how did your teacher solve it in class?
makes no sense for you to do these exercises if your teacher didn't show you how to do it
i remember that he did
but i guess i forgotr
if i have two numbers, a and b
I think you should review your lecture notes
and i say that a * b = 0
yes
what does that imply
they can be whatever as long as one is 0?
yeah. it says that either a or b MUST be 0
thats what i said
-5
think of the expressions inside brackets as numbers
and manipulate them as you would with numbers
do you have a maths textbook?
we dont
that cannot be possible
?
when I was your age, we had a thick textbook and we would go home and do 100s of sums
no handouts or anything
opened a big ass textbook and did sums back home. Call me old fashioned but that stuff built a lot of muscle memory that I don't think I would ever forget
your professor should give you dozens of trivial sums and exercises to help you build your muscle memory with basic tasks like factorization
can you show me an example handout from your professor?
sure
you should be able to do this stuff if you did lots of exercises
tasks?
why so few?
ask my teacher
norway is supposed to have the best education system, either I am missing something or norwegians are natural born mathematicians who don't need to do as many sums as we do
I agree
also try to understand the theory too
hey rainlinkz wanna see something cool
sure
yup
ahhhhhh
we had that
that's what (a+b)^2 is
this and the Pythagoras proof made me fall in love with maths as a child
i had to figure that out on my own because my teachers would just say yeah it's a^2+2ab+b^2
idk if it's just my school but it feels like there's too much random info without any reason why
he wants us to understand the concepts and proves everything he shows us
like memorize this and that
theory is as important as doing sums
he goes deep into it
do you know the proof of the quadratic formula?
wait is there a geometric proof
yes
I used to complain about completing the squares
he showed us that aswell
found it
he is a great teacher tbh but sometimes hes not
thanks for the help @round isle and @ionic bluff
can someone summarize special right triangles in an understandable way? we are doing them in class this week and i have no clue whats going on except something about 30, 60, 90 and 45, 45, 90
30-60-90 triangles and 45-45-90 triangles
those refer to the angle measures @drowsy pond
okay
it’s basically Pythagorean theorem
okay
How do I explain the relationships here with words/formulas?
<@&286206848099549185>
Did I do the right ping? :3
,rotate
The second one(if you know the first one... Let me know)
I need Halp

Usually you should follow that with your question
its my first day here
what is your question
sin2x/2sinx=cos^2x/2-sin^2x/2 after a couple steps i get to this cosx=cos^2x/2-sin^2x/2 what do i do now
why is secant negative in third quadrant if tangent is positive there and tangent is sin/cos
I cant because im on a laptop
then you need to find a way to write it down properly
wth
maybe use paint
please write down the equation in a proper way so it makes sense. At the moment, it is very hard to understand what your equation is exactly
@olive plover well secant is geometric inverse of cos
ok
im at this part : cosx=cos^2x/2-sin^2x/2
are you trying to make x the subject of the above equation?
what is your end goal with this equation?
I see
right
RHS is a trignometric identity
(cosx)^2 - (sinx)^2 = cos(2x)
please solve now and the equation is proved
how the heck did you get that
are you using half angle identity formula
you can verify this by expanding cos2x
now please use the trignometric identity on RHS to verify the equation
There is no cos2x
(cosx)^2 - (sinx)^2
that is equal to cos2x
here it is x/2 and not x
so make the appropriate substitution
im at this part : cosx=cos^2x/2-sin^2x/2
parentheses
how do you know whether cosx/2 refers to cos(x/2) or cos(x)/2 and how do you know you won't forget what you actually mean
the answer is you don't so you gotta put those parentheses there
and ideally you should just always put parentheses around the inputs of trig fictions
wth. My Apologies
obviously it should be clear to you now
No
what is not clear?
cos(x/2 + x/2) can be expanded using the cosine formula and you would get the original RHS
best you review trignometric identities again
cos(2t) = cos^2(t) - sin^2(t)
now replace t with x/2
uh yeah that just gives you the thing you were stuck at
thanks ..i guess
so my mcq exams are giving me problems such as if 3 i + 2 j + a k and 4i -3j + k are perpendicular to each other, what is the value of a?
(it's a vector problem so i,j,k are vector co-ords)
if they are A and B respectively, then the formula is A × B = 0
i,j,k are not vector coordinates, they're unit vectors.
yeah, sorry, that
There's a simpler way to approach this with the scalar product.
standard inner product on R^3
how should i go about it?
In particular:
$\overrightarrow{A} \cdot \overrightarrow{B} = 0$
Abhijeet Vats:
my dumbass forgot about dot product
abhi, don't swear at god or He will smite you
don't swear at god because the dude don't exist
find $a$ that maximizes $\norm{A\cross B}$. this is painful
RokettoJanpu:
Yes.
$||A \cross B|| = ||A||\cdot ||B||$
Abhijeet Vats:
is that the latex programming language?
how does so many people know all the syntax to use this bot
experience
hey guys can anyone help me pls?
it should be
I mean technically you can keep decreasing the base and keep increasing the height
While maintaining the same volume
So height can potentially be infinite with the base area close to zero
after a certain point the total SA would start increasing
How so?
If I keep increasing the height and decrease the surface area, the volume would remain the same
So ideally I could bring the surface area down to a very small value and the height to a very large value
you're making a very bad assumption
what evidence do you have to backup
"increasing height decreases the SA (at large values of h)"
Take a very large height and divide the volume with that
You will get the surface area
And that surface area would be really small
uh what?
yes
We want to find the smallest surface area for this volume
Pi * radius * radius = cylinder volume / height
Keep increasing height
Increase height to infinity
The base area becomes 0
gets close to 0 but ok
Exactly
how does that decrease the total SA of the cylinder?
I think he is asking for the base area
SA of a cylinder is not the same as the base area
The total surface area
Hahah
Right, you could take the derivative of the total surface area and find the value of h that gives you a minima for that
is this true for all cases?
Could someone tell me how I should calculate this one?
http://prntscr.com/ri9n7p
The line AC is just as long as the cirkels radius. The Angel BAC = 40 degrees.
what angle is v?
consider constructing AM and CM
@silent plank Thank! I got the answer 😉
I suck at math, I was hoping I could get some help on a simple problem
I want to calculate a slope of a series of pipes. Let's say X1 is (34.05) and I know that I want to have a Y% slope to X2 which is 56 meters away, how would I calcuate thaT?
Can you formulate this problem in a more formal way.
Slope is between two points.
@outer ravine yes it is right
can you explain how she did it because I screwed it up
I pretty much screwed up all of my notes 🙃
Well your teacher has written the Formula for area of a sector
Then she just substituted the right values into it
You do know what the Formula of a sector is right?
yeah I do
but this part
I don't get that part
like the way I solved it was you take the 4.5 and multiply 40 by 4.5 then divide by 360... which is wrong
Sorry I didn't understand your procedure. Best you show your calculation
,rotate
that looks fine. simplify your fraction
multiplication commutes so yeh.
oh
also idk why the last 2 problems on my homework just got a lot easier, we just haven't done any algebra for a couple months or so. I kinda forgot a bit of it
Where are you stuck?
Alright, do you have any ideas for an approach?
That would be much appreciated
So, consider the identity:
$\tan^2(k) + 1 = \sec^2(k)$
Abhijeet Vats:
You're welcome. I do hope you're able to solve it now.
That should help slot cheers @weak shoal
Hey could someone tell me
how can i find AB from ABC with (<ACB = 90) when i only have P=60cm and S=120cm?
<@&286206848099549185>
Perimeter and Area
Set up some systems of equations
You have 3 unknown variables and 3 equations you can make
aight
Draw a picture
a^2+b^2 != (a+b)^2
a²+b²=(a+b)²-2ab
np
Ye looks right
i need help 😫
anime cooch :|
lets start from the center's height
the center of the ferris wheel is 55ft above the ground
so whatever your sine function spits, you'll have to add 55to it
so d=55
now... the radius is 50ft
so the amplitude gonna be 50
so a=50
finally, since f(t) is a function of time, the b is gonna be it's period
which is the total time needed to complete the cycle multiplied with 2π
so b=2π/4min
well
do you have values for any of those letters
well there's many ways we can calculate y
it might just be confused, but i dont know what you're asking
you asked for the value of y
but you have no values for the others
so we can write expressions for y
e.g. sinA = y/v
sqrt(wz) or sqrt(w) * z
i feel like i've learned this before and my mind is just blanking
for part b would it be (-3, 7pi/4) ???
like im confused how to find another pair that represents (3,pi/4)
make it easy for yourself. keep the same radius and just find an angle coterminal with pi/4
isn't 7pi/4 a coterminal angle with pi/4
guys I dont understand how to find lengh of an arc of a cicle
@olive plover do you know any formulas that may help?
2pi r times x/360?
pi describes the length of half a unit circle you should able to deduce more things from there
@upper karma close. and i suggested you keep the same radius. same radius+coterminal angle describes the same point
they give me central angle of 80 and diameter of 20
i put 80 in x
but then i dont know about 20
i put 80 in x
@olive plover what does that mean
@weary drift so would it be (3, -7pi/4)
@upper karma that's one good answer. ANY angle coterminal w/ pi/4 is ok
4pi/9
Right so can you find what the length is in the circle you described?
It scales linearly
no
@weary drift ok and then converting it into a rectangular equation what would that be ?
@weary drift is it just sqrt2 / 2 , -sqrt2 / 2 ???
4pi/9 is the arc length with the angle you want on the circle of radius 1. The length scales with the radius of the circle. Do you know how to scale this arc length up to your circle?
@weary drift not a rectangular equation i mean to rectangular coordinates***
@upper karma
By what?
4pi/9 times 20?
No
That is double the size
You have 1*4pi/9 because the circle we calculate radians in is the unit circle
Which means we want to look at the radius
The unit circle has a diameter of 2
oh its 40pi/9
given diameter is 20
i got it correct
If you say so
@upper karma always remember the conversion between polar and rectangular. if you have (r,t) in polar then (x,y) in rectangular is given by (x,y)=(rcos(t),rsin(t))
ok
right triangle
How
well since its a right triangle the angle opposite of 450 is 90
and i subtracted 180- 90 - 38 an got 52 for the last angle
then i used law of sines
You dont need law of sines lmao, and you got the wrong answer anyway
oh lmao
i completely forgot about that
did you get 277.047
for the side opposite of angle 38 degrees
@rich wolf
,calc 450sin(38 deg)
Result:
277.04766389655
,calc 450cos(38 deg)
Result:
354.60483912302
@upper karma
Those
Wat u mean? That's the answer
oh that's it ?
Well, they want it in a <x,y> format
@umbral snow so < 354.604, 277.047> ???
Ya
yeah people just call it volume
@ashen mica what
4D volume
What
Yeah i get that dude
But what the fuck
Why
OMG ITS GRANT SANDERSON
From 3brown1blue
heil
He needs to do a bsauce collab
st. 3blue1brown
It is called volume.
"Area" and "length" are the exceptions
you still see area and length called volume sometimes
0 dimensional space is a point
-1d isnt a thing
oops i literally repeated you
One way to answer it is with linear algebra. How many vector spaces are zero dimensional? That is, has a basis of zero vectors?
The question doesn't make any sense, there's no 0D vector spaces
is {()} a vector space?
Nvm I just looked it up
() is additive identity and multiplicative identity
The zero vector space is defined to have dimension 0
yea
Hey Vsauce!
Michael Here!
Where are your fingers?
D-Don't touch your face!
Go wash your hands for 20 seconds.

how does sinxcosx+sinx = sinx(cosx+1)
Please
ive been trying for two hours please
distributive property / factorisation
the lack of parentheses is a little disturbing
dude i did that
$\sin(x)\cos(x) + \sin(x) = \sin(x) (\cos(x) + 1)$
ramonov:
ab + a = a(b+1)
is that correct
is what correct?
do you agree that:
ab + a = a(b+1)
i guess I thought i woud be using a trig IDentity
don't overthink it
no trig identites needed at all
recognise when they are/aren't needed
@golden panther it can be helpful
To introduce new variables
Like a or b
And set them equal to parts of the equation
if I want to find s when v = 21 mi/hr and t = 20 min
I do 20/60 * 21 mi/hr to get 7 mi
how does the /hr get canceled out?
(20/60hr) doesn't make sense
Convert t to hrs
I can say 1/3 of an hour
Yes
1/3hr?
Yes
seems so wrong, because I'm kinda saying 3 hours
????
it would look right if it was hr/3
1hr/3
20 mins is 1/3 of 1 hour
so it makes sense logically
Yes
1 min = 1 hr / 60
So 20 min = 20 hr / 60
Just multiply both sides by 20
All of this becomes second nature soon with practice
well I'm calculating to find the distance traveled
if it's 20hr/60 then isn't that 7mi/hr²
please help;
is this a Yes or No?
yes
i dont know if this belongs here since its a physics problem but i have cos(a) = (x)/(y*z) (x,y,z are actual numbers in the problem)
i have to find what angle a is
i think i have to use Arccos or something for it but we havent covered that in math class yet
So what you can do is use arccos at both sides
a = arccos((x)/(y*z))
Is the angle 0deg<a<360deg or are you looking for multiple answers?
because if you're just looking for one answer then hitting cos^-1(x/(y*z)) should be enough
@vale nimbus
@vale nimbus
np mate
5r + 5
no i meant what else do you know about DM
It’s 60
so what can you do
Is the value of r 30
guys
i don't know, is it?
why do you think it is 30?
Because dm is 60 and it is split in 2 and if u divide it it’s 30
what does that have to do with r, though
Wait is it 11
i don't know, is it?
Because 4 times 11 equals 44 and 11 plus 5 is 16 and 44 plus 16 is 60
@static kiln are you guessing the answer?
No
I looked at the choices
And I saw 11 and did the math
At first I didn’t even look at the choices so that’s why I said 30
Is 11 wrong?

Okay thanks for answering me
I’m leaving this discord y’all can’t help
lmfao okay cya
Lol

what
i went to eat
and i asked him if he was guessing the answer
so i suppose the answer is yes
i dont think he guessed
he did
he said "i saw 11 and did the math"
so he thought that looked like the one that is the most right lol
ok let's think about it
you know the base
you know the area
A = base * height / 2
for now, we're solving for height
h = 2 * A/b
now we know the height, and we know the base
if we drew in the height, we'd find that the isosceles triangle splits into two equal right triangles
divide the base by two to find the base for one right triangle
use pythagorean theorem to solve for length of the hypotenuse
and that's your leg
if we have omega = 4 radian / second, r = 2 in and t = 5 sec
doesn't the second become sec²
which is (1/60)²
we get 4 rad/second = s / 10 inches / second
so 4 / sec * (10 in. / sec)
40 in. / second²
nvm I found my answer. 60 ^2 seconds/ 60^2
How would I do question 6 or 7? I could not solve it at all 😂
@brazen depot do you still need help with this?
No i have solved it after asking my classmate! Thank you though :)
ok np
This is just a review but I've honestly completely forgotten how to do segment proofs
What I'm having trouble with is at #5 because I cant tell whether I should use definition of midpoint or angle bisecter
An explanation is also much appreciated 😁
Transitive Property @quick mesa
because 4 is PQ = NM and 3 is PN=NM so when you combine them you get PN=NM=PQ or PN=PQ
hey
yes
guys whats the best way to find the exact answer to y=tan^1(1) without using a calculator
@golden panther
was it really that simple