#geometry-and-trigonometry

1 messages · Page 254 of 1

crisp grove
#

see at the top of the cylinder

#

I mean the measure for the thickness is on the bottom

glacial wharf
#

I need some help with this shit

#

I forgot what theorem i need to use for this type of problem

upper karma
#

is it necessary i learn the csc, cot, sec identities for an end of year trig test im taking soon?

languid ingot
#

i would just learn everything my teacher taught me

upper karma
#

What kind of parametric equation, in polar coordinate system, would describe the motion of - like, a motorcycle on a tiny planet that is racing forward with just a little turn?

#

does anyone know a good youtube video

#

that reviews the whole trignometry part

#

Whats "the whole trigonometry part" ?

summer spire
#

@upper karma wouldn't that just be a circle of a certain diameter on a sphere?

upper karma
#

If the velocity matched the angle so that its end position is its start, then yes.

#

lets just say its a constant 1 degree angle

#

@summer spire (someone else told me that this is a differential equation - I am hoping this isn't true 😬 )

summer spire
#

beyond plotting a circle, I'm not even entirely sure what you're asking for tbh

#

the effect of the angle of the wheels would depend on the wheelbase and the size of the planet, but so long as everything is constant (speed, angle, etc) it doesn't sound super complicated

#

actually I don't even think speed would make a difference

rich wolf
#

Bro go engineer elsewhere

#

This is math server real problems dont matter

opaque spade
#

Anyone available

#

For

#

A quick Geo help question. Thing

dire rampart
upper karma
#

Im confused on what two possibles angles for angle B

#

I thought sinB is basically the angle and to find the other angle you inverse sin .77148 but it says it's incorrect and i don't understand

#

someone pls help :9

#

😭 *

languid ingot
#

the inverse sin cannot find an obtuse angle, instead it'll always give the supplementary acute angle

#

So arcsin of .77148 is 50.48697821132838, then other one will be 180 - 50.48697821132838 i think

vale nimbus
#

isnt it cuz sin(A) = sin(180°-A)

#

so they're just asking for the supplementairy angle

#

@upper karma

upper karma
#

@languid ingot was right i got it right but i'm not sure how to find c2

#

i used law of sines ( Sin angle B / side b = Sin angle C / side c )and got sin129.51/241.5 = sin14/c

#

then i crossed multiplied and got 241.5sin(14/sin(129.51

#

and that gave me 75.7266 but it says its wrong

silent plank
#

probably rounding errors or something

upper karma
#

oh yeah it was i rounded up angle C 2

fringe cipher
#

Show that the distance of any point on the equilateral hyperbola x² - y² = a² to the center is the mean proportional between the focal radii.
can someone help me show that?
something that might help is that from geometry, m is the mean proportional of p and iff p/m = m/q

#

iff = if and only if btw

stark ferry
#

How do you do this?

weak shoal
#

Draw a picture first

stark ferry
#

Ok

#

What next

weak shoal
#

Show your diagram

stark ferry
#

I can’t send pictures on my phone :/

fringe cipher
#

pls someone help 😦

#

Show that the distance of any point on the equilateral hyperbola x² - y² = a² to the center is the mean proportional between the focal radii.
can someone help me show that?
something that might help is that from geometry, m is the mean proportional of p and iff p/m = m/q
iff = if and only if btw

meager spruce
#

Any help with this would be great

#

I need to get this one done so I can 😴

winged zinc
#

@meager spruce

#

I can help

peak hound
#

Teacher explains literally nothing and I'm left on the dark on how this works

brave zephyr
#

@stark ferry Lol are you using Canvas?

proper citrus
#

Is there a way to simplify $tan^{-1} (\frac {tan \theta }{e})$

somber coyoteBOT
proper citrus
#

e is an arbitrary constant

dark sparrow
#

no

#

there is not

stark ferry
#

@brave zephyr yes

brave zephyr
#

Do you live in Howard County?

#

That’s what we use for assessments

#

And Homework’s

stark ferry
#

Nope I’m down south in corpus

night hinge
#

Are we allowed to post textbooks questions?

twin prawn
#

yes

upper karma
#

Question: Lets say you're a bike rider, and you start out at 0,0 - and you pedel forward (y+), but keep a constant turn of 1 degree to the right (x+) ----- what is the radius of the circle you will eventually create?

tribal wind
#

@upper karma

upper karma
#

ok, what if its just a particle, and not a 2 wheeled object?

tribal wind
#

then it's ill-defined, you need a length to have something like a 1-degree turned steering wheel

summer spire
#

still trying to make sense of the bike turning radius, huh? megathink
the form of the question changed since I last saw it

#

curious what you're trying to work this out for

upper karma
#

Yeah, it was this: imagine that you're a motorcyle on a tiny planet. is there a parametric equation in spherical coordinates (I think that'd be the easiest) to describe the motion of the bike at a constant 1 degree turn?

#

depends on the size of the planet and the speed of the bike I know .... but

#

I was trying to generalize it into the flat plane, and I'm still confused

#

because if I keep a constant 1 degree turn ---- well, its going to get into calculus here

#

lets say for each step forward, I then turn 1 degree - so that my path looks like a giant 360 faced polygon

#

well, a step forward then turn isn't CONSTANT - so, I reduce the step size - which reduces the radius

#

until - the step size is zero, so that the turn is CONSTANT, but then the circle is zero

#

😖 😕

upper karma
karmic swallow
#

anyone on

rich wolf
#

Is there a number system where |z|<0 can be true

dark sparrow
#

no

rich wolf
#

@dark sparrow pls

dark sparrow
#

why are you so desperate tho

#

why do you NEED negative absolute values

rich wolf
#

I want to define negative lengths

dark sparrow
#

for what

#

are you allergic to the triangle inequality or sth

rich wolf
#

Just in general

#

Having negative (and nonreal) lengths

dark sparrow
#

why do you need that

rich wolf
#

To do this

#

Not trolling i swear

tribal wind
#

minkowski space is kindaaaa like that

fringe dirge
#

triangle inequality is just going to be ruined

#

if you allow |z| < 0

#

and triangle inequality is like the thing that makes metric spaces what they are

#

otherwise you'd get just crazy spaces

sly marlin
#

Hmm, but using complex numbers, letting the sides be complex and hypotenuse be real, |(a+bi)(a-bi)|=c^2, which if we generalise a, bi to complex numbers, we are using two complex numbers to represent the direction of the sides of the triangle, which hmm...

somber coyoteBOT
sly marlin
#

too bad complex conjugates just behave weirdly

floral harbor
#

Is it correct?

sly marlin
#

it's a circle with radius 2

#

do you know what tan means?

#

@floral harbor

floral harbor
#

Opp/adj

sly marlin
#

okay, where's your triangle?

floral harbor
#

Its an arch

#

Not a triangle

sly marlin
#

you need to use a right triangle to use trigonometric ratios

#

(the simple opp/adj ones)

#

you can't use a sector

floral harbor
#

Mhm.

#

I could join the point with the y axis

sly marlin
#

okay, so what does that triangle give you for the coordinates?

floral harbor
#

Not sure

#

I know the radius (hypotensue) is 2

#

The angle is 3pi/10

#

?

#

Is x = 2/sin(3pi/10)

sly marlin
#

sin(3pi/10) < 1

#

that means x>2

#

does that make sense?

#

@floral harbor

floral harbor
#

Yes.

#

But it's bigger than hypotensue

silent plank
#

those are contradictory

floral harbor
#

Ah yes.

#

So it doesn't make sense.

#

Oof I'm confused.

silent plank
#

consider that triangle,
how would you find the length of the blue line?

floral harbor
#

sine of pi/5 would give me (blue line)/2

silent plank
#

yes

#

contiune

floral harbor
#

Blue line/2sin(pi/5) = 1

silent plank
#

that's working against your goal, (also parentheses)

floral harbor
#

Ah it's true.

#

Blue line = 2sin(pi/5)

silent plank
#

yes.

#

and that will be the y-coordinate of that point

floral harbor
#

Mhm.

silent plank
#

(because the point is that many units above the x-axis)

floral harbor
#

Yes.

#

Tan pi/5 = (2sin(pi/5))/red line

silent plank
#

what ratio does tan give you?

floral harbor
#

Opp/adj

silent plank
#

oh wait

#

misread what you wrote

floral harbor
#

Ah OK.

silent plank
#

you could use that, or you could use a simpler trig ratio directly

floral harbor
#

Cos

#

cos(pi/5)= Red line/2

#

Red line = 2cos(pi/5)

silent plank
#

yeh

floral harbor
#

Ok.

whole zephyr
#

Hi! I have a question. For exercises that involves finding the others trigonometry functions having the value of one, if it's negative, do I have to include the negative in the identities? My teacher says no.

dark sparrow
#

what's "it"

whole zephyr
#

The result. For example Tanx = 1.

dark sparrow
#

oh like "here's the value of one trig function at x, find the values of the other five trig functions at the same x"?

#

to determine the signs of those, you need to know what quadrant x is in

#

for which extra information should be supplied

whole zephyr
#

Oh, so my teacher was write. Thank you!

dark sparrow
#

write 📝 is not the same as right ➡️

sacred lynx
#

Is heron formula is applicable to a point in space

tribal wind
#

n o

solid kiln
#

how do i do this?

tacit karma
#

@solid kiln You can start by realizing that the missing angles in that quadrilateral are congruent

solid kiln
#

@tacit karma i already solved it, thanks alot anyways:)

tacit karma
#

okay

rich wolf
#

@tacit karma cursed name

minor wren
#

How is number 8 solved? Maybe just a link to a video or something would help me

mystic dock
#

Not sure about what I am telling you since the number seem a bit weird but; whats the "primary" relation in a right triangle?
it starts with p ;p

minor wren
#

Uh, proportion?

#

: /

mystic dock
#

Well I would say Pythagorean theorem but as I said the numbers seem suspicious, let me see if thats actually the way to solve it

minor wren
#

ok

#

Thank you by the way

#

I'm dumb

mystic dock
#

yeah it is definitely solvable with Pythagorean but the number you find is weird, just that

minor wren
#

yeah

#

I got 7.549

rich wolf
#

What was the exact number

sleek tulip
#

Is this the right channel to ask about analytic geometry?

tribal wind
#

yea

sleek tulip
#

I have an assignment question that isn't quite in a form that I can related to my notes ect, I just want to make sure my approach isn't just completely flawed

#

more asking if the logic I used to find n is valid than anything else

tribal wind
#

yea the logic is good

sleek tulip
#

thanks

olive plover
#

would it be more efficient to solve that using 1+cot^2=csc^2 or unit circle

silent plank
#

about the same. try both
use w/e you're most comfortable with

rich wolf
#

what is cot theta by definition

olive plover
#

idk what side is what of the triangele

#

i know csc= 1/sin

rich wolf
#

,rotate

somber coyoteBOT
rich wolf
#

cos is horizontal

#

sin is vertical

olive plover
#

hm

#

where should i put the 3 and 2 in the triangle

rich wolf
#

think about it

#

what is csc

olive plover
#

i thought and it was wrong

#

1/sin

rich wolf
#

what is sin

olive plover
#

i know

#

wait

#

-3 in opposide and 2 hypothenus ? thats sin

#

but i eneed 1/sin

rich wolf
#

dude work with me

#

what is the definition of sin

olive plover
#

side opposite the angle that you are conducting the functions on over the hypotenus

rich wolf
#

so sine = opp/hyp

olive plover
#

yes

rich wolf
#

and csc = 1/sin

#

so what is 1/(opp/hyp)

olive plover
#

hyp/opp

rich wolf
#

do you get it now

olive plover
#

i think i do but the teacher key got a different answer

#

so im confused

rich wolf
#

well that's not the question you're trying to answer

#

it says to find cot

#

but you're given csc

olive plover
#

what i mean is i think the teacher marked the sides of the triangle wrong

#

1 sec

#

are the sides right

#

atleasxt the two

rich wolf
#

yeah that's right

olive plover
#

oh i knew it

#

tyhe teacher got it wrong

silent plank
#

what did the teacher do?

olive plover
#

thisa

rich wolf
#

yeah that's wrong

silent plank
#

^

rich wolf
#

good job

olive plover
#

ty

rich wolf
#

now you can tell your teacher she's dum

olive plover
#

ye

#

she has a some sort of memory loss so maybe thats why

#

did i do this correctly or the squareroot of 91 should had a negative infront? teacher key looks weird again

silent plank
#

-ve since its below the x-axis

olive plover
#

yes i thought sdo

#

\

silent plank
#

does the question specifically mention quadrant 4?
what's the teacher saying?

olive plover
#

yees

merry scroll
#

hi! can anyone help me figure this problem out? you were supposed to apparently find the length of x using only these two values.

#

ps im only in the 8th grade algebra 1 so I'm not very familiar with geometry or trig

silent plank
#

consider similar triangles

merry scroll
#

i have no idea what that means?

white cradle
#

oof

#

so you aren't aware of geometry, trig or similar triangles

#

let us begin with what you do know related to this question?

merry scroll
#

nothing at all, they just gave me this

#

okay, after looking it up I kinda get it, but I don't know how it would help me

silent plank
#

which method does it show?
similar triangles or trig?

#

show a pic of it if you can

merry scroll
#

I don't really know, this was during a test, so I couldn't take a pic of it, and the picture I provided is what the test showed me

silent plank
#

as in what you looked up

merry scroll
#

oh

#

I just looked up what similar triangles meant

silent plank
#

not sure why'd they give you that without teaching that stuff yet

#

what parts of geo do you actually know?

merry scroll
#

i know stuff about angles, cogruency and translations and stuff

#

i think the test was just to see what we know

silent plank
#

congruency and similarity are relatively close

merry scroll
#

hm yeah I know that part, but how would I use that to solve for x?

silent plank
#

unlike congruent triangles, instead of corresponding sides being equal,
corresponding sides are in the same ratio

#

triangles ABC and DBA are similar
BD corresponds to AB
AB corresponds to BC
which gets you
BD/AB = AB/BC
32/x = x/52

merry scroll
#

oh!

silent plank
#

alternatively you can use trig

#

$\cos(B) = \frac{BD}{AB} = \frac{AB}{BC}$

somber coyoteBOT
silent plank
#

to reach the same result

merry scroll
#

oh that makes so much sense now!

#

thank you so much!

alpine wadi
#

If A B C D are 4 points on a plane, of which neither 3 are colinear
A) how many lines are defined with thise points
B) how many triangles are defined by those points

#

This is the solution for a

#

But I have no clue how to solve it

white cradle
#

alright, no three points are collinear

#

you know what that means?

alpine wadi
#

They arent in a straight line?

white cradle
#

yes indeed

#

now what gives you, is a leverage to do a neat and simple observation

#

in this case, that is, you can draw a unique line by choosing any 2 of the four points

#

emphasis on unique, specifically since no three are collinear

#

you get that?

dark sparrow
#

,rccw

somber coyoteBOT
#

Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages

dark sparrow
alpine wadi
#

Lol

#

,rccw

somber coyoteBOT
alpine wadi
#

and @white cradle while I can draw it and figure it out like that, I want to know how to use the approach shown in the solution

#

in the book

#

it is the problem number 170.

white cradle
#

i didnt say draw it lol

#

i only said, by choosing any 2 of the 4 points, you will be defining a unique line

#

in which case, the number of lines you can draw would be the number of ways of choosing 2 points from 4 points

#

aka 4 choose 2, aka 4C2

alpine wadi
#

oh, so that is what it means

#

thanks

#

and what about the next step

#

_

#

the 43 / 52

#

where do the 3 and 5 come from

white cradle
#

you dont know what 4C2 means?

alpine wadi
#

now I do

#

I think

white cradle
#

$^nC_r = \frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}$

somber coyoteBOT
alpine wadi
#

it means from 4 points we choose 2

white cradle
#

nCr is a general expression of choosing r objects from n objects

alpine wadi
#

now I have no clue, again

#

oh, ok

white cradle
#

you can figure out this expression if you think about it

alpine wadi
#

n is the number we choose from and r is the number of object we can chose

white cradle
#

$n! = n(n-1)(n-2)...(2)(1)$

somber coyoteBOT
white cradle
#

thats called a

#

factorial

alpine wadi
#

I have heard of those

white cradle
#

so they just plugged in r=2 and n=4

alpine wadi
#

but now I don't understand how we got 4-3 from that factorial

white cradle
#

its 4*3

alpine wadi
#

wont it be just 432*1

white cradle
#

yes, but see denominator

#

its 2*1*2*1

alpine wadi
#

so should I go 4*3 * 2 * 1

#

or just stop at 3

light socket
#

can someone help me with a problem. I know the answer, but I don't get why my method doesn't work for solving it

white cradle
#

(4x3x2x1)/(2x1)(2x1) = (4x3)/(2x1)

alpine wadi
#

oh

white cradle
#

must go till four, see i wrote all the expansions lol

#

just follow them

#

and simplify

alpine wadi
#

ok, I get it now

white cradle
#

kk

alpine wadi
#

thanks

#

I'll try it that way

white cradle
#

look up "n choose r" online

#

and see how that formula is derived

#

logically, its simple

alpine wadi
#

do I do the same for triangles but 4C3 ?

white cradle
#

ye

#

again only works cause no three points collinear

#

@light socket what is it

light socket
#

so angle T is 35 and angle A is 30 right?

#

so then if i draw a line connecting AT and another one connecting AB can I not use sin law to find AB, then use trig to find height of building

white cradle
#

T and A are points, not angles

#

just for clarity, please mention the three vertices containing the angle,

#

as in angle ABC refering to the angle subtended at vertex B

light socket
#

wdym, wouldn't T and A be angles if I draw lines AT and AB, creating angle of elevation and depressin

white cradle
#

its just a wrong way of writing, either draw the angles explicitly and label them as T and A

#

or mention all three vertices

#

ill do it for u, what you mean by T is angle ATC and A is angle BAC where C is the base of the building

light socket
#

ye

#

my bad

white cradle
#

how would you use sin law, the angles dont belong to the same triangle even

#

drop out the laws and shit for a moment, and think bout it logically

light socket
#

can't you do 1.6/sin 30 = x/sin 35

white cradle
#

they dont belong to the same triangles

light socket
#

Oh right

white cradle
#

see, from triangle ABC, you can get x in terms of AC

#

using a simple trig ratio

#

and in triangle ATC, you can get a relation between TC and AC again

#

eliminate AC and youll find x

#

try it

light socket
#

just to make sure, angle ABC is 60 then?

white cradle
#

yes

light socket
#

wdym by X in terms of AC

#

is x BC?

white cradle
#

like x = (something) x AC

#

yes, x =BC, height of building which u want to find

light socket
#

so i get

#

x/tan 30 = tan 35 (x+1.6) ?

white cradle
#

yes

light socket
#

so then I would do x/tan 30 = tan 35 (x) + tan 35 (1.6)

white cradle
#

just plug in the values of the trig functions

#

and solve for x

#

not hard from here

light socket
#

i think ive made a mistake

white cradle
#

hm?

light socket
#

cuz when i do that, i get 0.3x = 0.646

#

meaning the building is 2.15m tall, which is not the right answer

white cradle
#

what is the ans

light socket
#

7.52

#

it says that the equation should be h/tan 30 = (h+1.6)/tan 35

white cradle
#

oh

#

that doesn't seem right

light socket
white cradle
#

well theyre using angle of declination as angle of elevation

#

for whatever reason

light socket
#

whats that

white cradle
#

they flipped the angles

#

like instead of ATC being 35 they're taking TAC as 35

#

some error

light socket
#

it doesn't make sense for tan 35 = H+1.6/x

white cradle
#

ye they used the wrong angle that's all

#

dw, your work is correct, given the question you showed me

upper karma
#

guys I need a proofing problem

#

oop

#

have*

#

which leads me to believe I can say that CAE = CBD because Equilateral triangle

#

actually nvm

#

or could I say similar because of reflexive properties

alpine wadi
#

how can I get good at geometry?

#

I hate it

#

especiallly the proofs

#

I am now stuck on this problem because I have no idea how to even approach it

#

Lines a and b are parallel and passing by line c. Point A belongs to a, B to b and C to c. How many planes is it possible to make from all the points and lines?

#

I have no idea how to even start doing this

upper karma
#

I need some worksheets
Its to calculate angles and lengths of triangles using sin and cos and tan
And using the law of sins and cos
Hope im not bothering you all

dark sparrow
#

i can attempt to throw one together

#

i need only one piece of information

#

how many problems?

#

@upper karma

#

if you don't answer, i'm gonna make you one with around 20

upper karma
#

Hello

#

Im back

#

@dark sparrow

#

Ppease help

dark sparrow
#

ok so wait

#

do you already have some problems and want me to help you with those

#

or do you want me to make you a worksheet with some problems

#

@upper karma

#

...

#

so.....

dire rampart
upper karma
#

i want you to give me a worksheet with the questions

meager spruce
#

I need help with this one, I don't know where to start lol

devout harbor
#

The sin graph will help if you know it's sketch at least?

meager spruce
#

I understand the restriction is from 0 - pi, and I need to find the theta that makes it equal .25?

devout harbor
#

You have to use the calculator, we can't do it by hand

meager spruce
#

What would I input

devout harbor
#

$\theta = \sin^{-1} (0.25)$

#

Use the sin inverse option

somber coyoteBOT
devout harbor
#

make sure the calc is in radian mode

meager spruce
#

with rad or degrees

#

ok

#

I got .2526

devout harbor
#

Okay, part a is easy, what do u think about part b

meager spruce
#

wait so is the answer .2526

#

I'm confused

devout harbor
#

Yes

#

Oh my bad

#

There is another answer

meager spruce
#

is it + or -

devout harbor
#

?

meager spruce
#

What would the other answer be

#

or how would i get it rather

devout harbor
#

Sorry

#

Yes the answer is +0.256 radians, for the second answer, it would be better if I show u the graph

#

so u know what's going on

meager spruce
#

ok sounds good

devout harbor
#

u know the graph right?

meager spruce
#

The graph of sin?

devout harbor
#

Yes

meager spruce
#

yes I know that one

devout harbor
#

Okay.

meager spruce
#

sin(x) right?

devout harbor
#

Yes.

meager spruce
#

ok I got that

devout harbor
#

We want to know where the value of sin(x) is 1/4

#

And it has two possible answers in the domain 0 < x < pi as you can see in the graph

meager spruce
#

gotcha

#

so we have to find the other x value

devout harbor
#

yes, can u think of how?

#

look at the x axis

#

You know the point of origin is (0,0) yes?

meager spruce
#

yes

devout harbor
#

Just think there's a 0 written there

#

so the gap b/w 0 and 0.2526 is..?

meager spruce
#

double .25226

devout harbor
#

?

#

No.

#

Just 0.2526

meager spruce
#

would that be the answer

devout harbor
#

No

meager spruce
#

the distance from 0 to .25 is .25

devout harbor
#

I'm talking about the gap, ie the difference b/w 0 and 0.2526

#

Yes.

#

Do you see where I have the "?" on the x axis?

meager spruce
#

yes

#

190 - .25

#

*180 - .25

devout harbor
#

Well the gap from the "?" to pi is the same as the gap from 0 to 0.2526

#

No, it's not 180 - 0.25

#

It's pi - 0.2526

meager spruce
#

ok

devout harbor
#

did u understand?

meager spruce
#

Yes that makes sense

devout harbor
#

Okay then

meager spruce
#

Would I write pi - .2526

devout harbor
#

Yes.

#

And you can see both answers are in the range of 0 < x < pi from the graph or by calculation

meager spruce
#

yes

devout harbor
#

okay

meager spruce
#

so what about the all real numbers

devout harbor
#

For that you need to know about the period of the sin function

#

@meager spruce

meager spruce
#

which is how often it completes a full rotation

devout harbor
#

Yes.

meager spruce
#

So I need to know the period of sin(.25)?

devout harbor
#

Just the period of $\sin(\theta)$

somber coyoteBOT
devout harbor
#

LOok at your question, it's written sin(theta) = 0.25

meager spruce
#

2pi right

devout harbor
#

So it's talking about y= sin(theta).

#

Yes.

meager spruce
#

So I know the period of sin(x) is 2pi, and we need to find all the points that y = .25 within that?

devout harbor
#

No.

#

For part (a), our restriction was that theta or x had to be between 0 and pi when sin(theta) or sin(x) = 0.25. For part b, there is no restriction.

#

That's all it's saying

meager spruce
#

Wouldn't there be infinite answers then

devout harbor
#

Yes and we need to write a formula for it

#

that's all

#

Btw do you have the numeric value for the 2nd answer?

#

it was pi - 0.2526, can u calculate that

meager spruce
#

how do I simplify that

#

2.88

#

does that sound right?

devout harbor
#

?

#

Yeah it's right

#

Simplify what?

#

Okay, now for part b, let's get down to business.

meager spruce
#

I'm confused as to what to write for the formula

devout harbor
#

I'll write it down and also explain

meager spruce
#

ok thanks

devout harbor
#

Or maybe you could write it after I'm done explaining

#

The period is 2pi, so we know for sure that the sin function will repeat it's value after 2pi radians. It could also repeat earlier, like sin(theta) is 1/4 at 0.2526 and also at 2.88. The difference is not 2pi. But these are the only two answers.

#

So we separate them both. For 0.2526, if we keep adding 2pi to it, then the sin function will have a value of 1/4

meager spruce
#

makes sense

devout harbor
#

And now you also keep addin 2pi to 2.88

meager spruce
#

That makes sense

#

but what would the equation be

devout harbor
#

You have to keep adding 2pi, that's the hint for the equation

#

We could add 2pi one time

#

Or 2 times

#

3 times, etc

meager spruce
#

.2526 + 2pi(x) = .25

#

something like that?

devout harbor
#

Forget the =0.25

meager spruce
#

so just .2526 + pi(x)

devout harbor
#

what's x?

#

🙂

meager spruce
#

x is the number of times we add 2pi?

devout harbor
#

Yes, and that's an integral value. We could add 0 times, 1 times, 2 times, etc..

#

Thing is, we could also subtract 2pi

#

Because we can go backwards

#

I suggest replacing x with n.

#

Where n is any integer.

#

So that's your solution

#

$0.2526 + n(2\pi) : n \in \mathbb {Z}$

meager spruce
#

.2526 + 2pi(n) and 2.88 + 2pi(n)

somber coyoteBOT
devout harbor
#

Do the same for the other answer

#

Yes

#

So there you go.

#

$2.88 + n(2\pi) : n \in \mathbb {Z}$

somber coyoteBOT
meager spruce
#

what does Z stand for

devout harbor
#

Integer.\

#

So I hope you understood.

#

Good bye

meager spruce
#

Thanks for the help!

#

I understand now

devout harbor
#

np

meager spruce
#

good bye

digital gulch
#

What’s a locus?

silent plank
#

,w locus

somber coyoteBOT
digital gulch
#

Oh thanks

whole panther
#

how do i find the volume of that?

dark sparrow
#

,rccw

somber coyoteBOT
dark sparrow
#

what is this shape

eternal crag
#

physics textbook swim pool

whole panther
#

both sides are rectangles

rotund galleon
#

So it's just an oblong?

#

(idk the proper name.)

#

rectangular prism, thats the one

whole panther
#

i think its a frustum but not sure

#

maybe

#

so what's the volume?

rotund galleon
#

Well are the parrellel sides different length?

whole panther
#

no

#

both 3.3 meters

rotund galleon
#

Vol = b*w*h

whole panther
#

what does that mean

#

w

rotund galleon
#

width

#

It'll be easier if you google this yourself man

#

Just google: volume of a rectangular prism

whole panther
#

im getting 10 different answers in google

#

idk why

#

and what's b?

rotund galleon
#

base length

#

Trust me google it

silent plank
#

its not a rectangular prism

rotund galleon
#

he said that the parellel sides were same length

whole panther
#

yes

#

its not rectangular

rotund galleon
#

what, you said they were the same -_-

#

Okay. Well in that case take the average.

#

(of the two sides that are of different length)

#

and you can apply the rectangle formula. It is often best to get a geometric visualization for this, so a youtube video would really really help

whole panther
#

2167.28?

silent plank
#

maybe? i can't read your handwriting

whole panther
#

base 1: 3.3 and 2.4

#

base 2: 3.3 and 4.7

#

length 185

silent plank
#

wait you just said they were both squares?

whole panther
#

rectangles

#

sorry

silent plank
#

ahk that makes more sense

#

just a trapezoidal prism then

#

2167.275 sounds about right

valid dagger
#

Uh math noob here might be a dumb question but is
Csc = -2 is in Quadrant 4 equivalent to Cot = -√3

#

or is it just √3?

weary drift
#

@valid dagger just looking at x in [0,2pi), csc(x)=-2 with x being in quad 4 does imply x=11pi/6, making cot(x)=-sqrt(3)

valid dagger
#

Oki thank youu

upper karma
#

hi can someone explain small angle approximation to me

#

like i know sin x is approximately equal to x but how does sin 1rad=1rad???

hidden scaffold
#

So I have these 2 circles with radiuses 2 and 3. Now I need to create formule for the line which passes through A and B where P is at (0, 0)

mortal heart
#

I have done it so many times and I still don’t get it right

white cradle
#

ok

hidden scaffold
#

H2 = sin(35) * 20 I think

#

Degrees

white cradle
#

y 12

hidden scaffold
#

20*

white cradle
#

ye

hidden scaffold
#

Rounded is 11.47

sleek sequoia
#

whats the point of sin cos tan

#

??

#

ping me

ebon minnow
#

Hey hey

#

I've got a pyramid I know that's it's squared, <SAC is 45° and AD=DC=BC=BA=20

#

How do I get SO

ebon minnow
#

nvm, I worked it out, but don't really understand why

#

nvm I'm just dumb

ebon minnow
#

I've encountered a different problem now

#

How do I get anything from this rectangle?

languid ingot
#

Get anything?

#

It's 30 60 90

ebon minnow
#

I need to get the volume

#

Excuse me for my bad english

#

@coral sapphire Sorry for tagging, can you help?

coral sapphire
#

What do you know about 30 60 90 triangles

ebon minnow
#

?

coral sapphire
#

What about AC

ebon minnow
#

it's xroot of 3

coral sapphire
#

Correct

ebon minnow
#

use the pythagorean theorem

coral sapphire
#

not necessarily

ebon minnow
#

I'm lost

#

it's ~1.73 to 2

hidden scaffold
#

So I have these 2 circles which touch each other with radiuses 2 and 3. Then there is a line which touches both of the circles in points A and B. Now, I want to create the line in form y = ax for the touching (tangent?) line through A and B. Point P is (0, 0)

ebon minnow
#

Type 3: You know the long leg (the side across from the 60-degree angle). Divide this side by the square root of 3 to find the short side. Double that figure to find the hypotenuse.

#

got it

#

so now what

#

How do I get AB or BC are the corners 90 degrees?

coral sapphire
#

Yes the corners are 90 degrees

#

Angle ABC is 90

mortal heart
#

Sorry to resend this again because it gives me 11.47 and that was marked wrong. (I’m trying to find h2)

rich wolf
#

@mortal heart 20sin35

ebon minnow
#

@rich wolf Do you know the formula how to calculate the volume of CAMB?

#

AB = 2 , M is a mid-point

rich wolf
#

What shape is that

ebon minnow
#

a cube

rich wolf
#

K

#

But what shape is CAMB

ebon minnow
#

triangular prism I guess

rich wolf
#

No

mortal heart
hidden scaffold
#

11.47

mortal heart
#

Imma try again with that

hidden scaffold
#

I said 11.47 the first time you asked 😄

mortal heart
#

Yeah I know I had 11.46 so I guess I confuse it lol

#

Sorry for that

#

Anyways it doesn’t matter because they changed problems

hidden scaffold
#

Ohw

upper karma
silent plank
#

mAngles:
JKM + MKL = JKL

upper karma
#

Hmm...

silent plank
#

wait whoops typpo

#

fixed

#

and you already know:
MKL and JKL

upper karma
#

Mhm

upper karma
#

Why is arccos(-root2/2) not -45? It says the answer is 135.

silk crown
#

what is cos(-45°)

upper karma
#

Wouldn’t it be -1/root2?

silk crown
#

why?

upper karma
#

Cuz cos of 45 is 1/root2 so if it’s negative 45 than just put a negative sign right?

silk crown
#

Not really

#

Try drawing the graph is cos(x)

#

See where the value is negative

#

(goes below X axis)

upper karma
#

For the cos graph both 45 are .7

#

Negative 45 and positive 45 are .4

#

No .7

silk crown
#

Yes

#

Because cosine is positive in the 4th quadrant

#

cos(-x) = cos(x)

#

So where will the graph first be negative?

upper karma
#

After the -90 and 90

silk crown
#

alright so now try to figure out what value of cos we should put so that it comes as negative 1/√2

upper karma
#

135 and -135

silk crown
#

and why

upper karma
#

You tell me

silk crown
#

ok so try to think about what cos(180°-x) would become

#

go back to the graph

upper karma
#

-1?

silk crown
#

why?

#

It can't be a constant value

#

X is a variable

upper karma
#

Right

silk crown
#

So try doing this:

#

from 180°, move the point x degrees on the x-axis and see where it ends up

upper karma
#

Wait what?

#

I don’t understand

#

Damn

silk crown
#

Ok nevermind with graphs then, think back to the unit circle

upper karma
#

Wait 180 degrees is (-1,0) so cos would be -1

#

Cuz it’s (cos,sin)

#

And -45 degrees would be 315 and that’s 7pi/4 and it’s positive root2/2

#

And 135 is negative root2/2 or 3pi/4 because the cosine value for the second quadrant is negative

silk crown
#

thats what I was getting to but yeah

#

CAST -> cosine, all, sine, tangent

upper karma
#

Oh okay sorry I got confused with the 180-x stuff

silk crown
#

sorry I confused you with it lol

upper karma
#

I literally had no clue what to do I was just staring at my graph lol

silk crown
#

It's just the intuition behind where the +ve/-ve thing in the quadrants comes from

upper karma
#

Oh okay

silk crown
#

If you want to try to check out the parts where it's positive and where it's negative

upper karma
#

Wait why do we do cos of 45 when doing cos of 135

silk crown
#

wdym?

#

cos(135°) = cos(180° - 45°) = -cos(45°) is what you'll see

upper karma
#

It’s cos of 135 so when we try to figure it out we can look at the 45-45-90 triangle and use cos45 which is root2/2 and that 135 is in second quadrant which means x is negative which means it’s -root2/2

#

But what’s the reason we use cos(45)?

silk crown
#

Not sure what you mean lol

upper karma
#

Wait

#

Let me see how I can word this

#

Wait what does this mean cos(135°) = cos(180° - 45°) = -cos(45°)

silk crown
#

Let me draw a diagram

upper karma
#

Okay

silk crown
#

So you can see that 135° + 45° = 180° right?

upper karma
#

Yes

silk crown
#

now if we do cos(180° - 45°) think that we're starting from the negative x-axis and drawing the 45°

#

It would end up in the 2nd quadrant, where cosine is negative

upper karma
#

Right

silk crown
#

And we also formed a triangle with angle 45° here so we get the cosine from it

upper karma
#

Yes

silk crown
#

I guess what's what you were asking on how cos(45°) shows up here?

upper karma
#

Yes

silk crown
#

And again the negative sign is there because the triangle is in the 2nd quadrant

upper karma
#

Yea

silk crown
#

Is your doubt cleared?

upper karma
#

Yea I think I understand for the most part imma finish off my homework and I’ll be back if I got any more questions

#

Alright I’ll see u later

silk crown
#

Aight

#

glhf

upper karma
#

Thx u too

cursive folio
#

oh sorry my bad

silent vigil
#

can someone help me with this ? I am not sure if i am doing it right.

silent plank
#

$(a-b)^2 \neq a^2 - b^2$

somber coyoteBOT
silent vigil
#

ooohh thanks

limber anchor
#

I just had a quick question about Trig

#

So I’m on a scientific calculator and I want to do SinX = 7/25

#

Do I have to do SinX/1 equals 7/25 and then cross multiply to get X?

#

Wait no that wouldn’t work

rich wolf
#

@limber anchor you have to use inverse sine

limber anchor
#

So Sin^-1(7/25)?

#

Wait I think I got it hold on

#

Yeah I got it now thank you

rich wolf
#

@limber anchor lmao

limber anchor
#

Wait so would it be .28?

rich wolf
#

Degrees or rad?

limber anchor
#

Degrees

rich wolf
#

@limber anchor make sure you're in the right mode

#

It is .28 Radians

#

But 16 deg

limber anchor
#

I swear I hit Degrees

#

It’s even highlighted Im so confused

rich wolf
#

What calculator?

limber anchor
#

TI-84 Plus

rich wolf
#

Press mode

#

Then select degree

limber anchor
#

That’s what I did

rich wolf
#

Uh huh

#

Now does it say degree on the screen

limber anchor
#

I don’t think mine says that when I do something like that

#

Okay so it’s 16.26 but I round down to 16?

rich wolf
#

Look at the top of the screen lol

#

Idk what you need to round to

#

That's up to you

limber anchor
#

I think I do because it says I need to go round to the nearest whole number

#

I really hope I don’t fail this test

#

So the ratios for a reference angle would just be like 7/25 right do I even have to solve anything?

junior hazel
#

Whaaaa

dark sparrow
#

@junior hazel do you still need help with this

junior hazel
#

@dark sparrow yes

dark sparrow
#

okay what's giving you trouble

junior hazel
#

How do I order these angles @dark sparrow

#

Sorry I was reading something

dark sparrow
#

what do you mean

#

do you not know how to tell which of these angles are bigger and which ones are smaller?

junior hazel
#

Well A could be 50 or 29

#

Or c could be 44 or 29

#

Same with B

dark sparrow
#

ANGLES are not SIDES

junior hazel
#

So b is 44?

#

Or is it 29

upper karma
#

@junior hazel you still need help?

dark sparrow
#

@junior hazel angle B is neither of these

#

do you even know what an angle is

upper karma
#

@junior hazel i think i can help you out

#

let me know if this helps

#

i tried to make it intuitive for you

#

by drawing it out

junior hazel
#

@upper karma @dark sparrow back

#

Thanks poly

#

Yes I know what an angle is

upper karma
#

@junior hazel does my video make intuitive sense to you

dark sparrow
#

so how come you keep confusing angles with sides

junior hazel
#

Yes

#

Ehhh

daring solstice
#

Hey I have a math question, its from a quiz I took yesterday

#

Okay so for this question, Can I just subtract the area of the hallway+kitchen and bathroom from the total area?

#

also, for the hallway and kitchen could I just do 8x18 to find the area of the two?

drowsy walrus
#

for your first question, im confused as to what area you need to solve for

#

but for the second one yes, if the diagram is drawn correctly

gaunt falcon
daring solstice
#

Basically I had to find the area of the two bedrooms and the living room to find the cost of something which is a diff problem

fringe dirge
#

!15m

south prism
#

what would be the easiest way of $finding M \epsilon AB so that AM=2MB, A(-1,1) and B(5,7)$

somber coyoteBOT
quiet mason
#

have you heard of the section formula

#

you have AM:MB=2:1

#

now use the section formula

south prism
#

never heard of it, thanks

#

@quiet mason i've found the formula but if the ratio is 2:1 ==> m=2 and n equals 1?

#

for $M=(\frac{(mx_2+nx_1)}{(m+n)}, \frac{(my_2+ny_1)}{(m+n)})$

somber coyoteBOT
quiet mason
#

yes

#

@south prism

#

you have all the information you need now

south prism
#

thanks

dark sparrow
#

\in, btw

#

finding $M \in AB$ such that $AM = 2MB$

somber coyoteBOT
violet dagger
#

Easy grometry but hard for mee

south pewter
#

Hi, how do I do question 1? I don’t understand how you use the original equation of f(x) to solve

jade valley
#

f(x) is only drawn on the graph. technically there is no "original equation of f(x)"

south pewter
#

So then how do I use it?

umbral snow
#

What's the transformations on f?

jade valley
#

The domain of f(x) is the interval on the x axis containing it. You can see the graph goes from x=-6 to x=2, so the domain is [-6, 2].

south pewter
#

Well for the first one it is five units right

#

Okay

jade valley
#

The range is the interval on the y-axis containing f(x), so from y = -2 to y = 2, or [-2, 2].

#

Then you have to look at the transformations in (a), (b), and (c) and see how they affect the domain and range

south pewter
#

Alright

#

But I don’t know how to use the original

#

I know the domain and range of the original but I don’t know how that helps me

#

Do I use the values from the graph of the original?

jade valley
#

Think about what 2f(x) looks like compared to f(x). 2f(x) is just two times f(x) at every point on the graph. So if you go look at the graph at x = 2, you can see that the y value, also known as f(2), is y = 2.

#

So then if you were to look at 2f(x) at x = 2, you would see 2 times what you saw before. 2*2 = 4.

#

So 2f(x) is the whole graph scaled by two on the y-axis

wintry elm
#

Could I get help with this? I'm in an introductory university geometry course and we have just covered Menaleus and Cevas Theorem

jade valley
#

Similarly, f(x-5) is the whole graph shifted to the right by five units.

south pewter
#

Ohh

#

So the domain in the first one is -1, 7

jade valley
#

yes correct

south pewter
#

Oh thank you

jade valley
#

np

wintry elm
#

^^?

upper karma
#

@dark sparrow i tagged you (explaining just so hopefully you aren't annoyed) because i wanted to ask you in specific if you remember things like the proofs for obtuse angles for law of cosines/law of sines?

dark sparrow
#

uh

#

does... there even need to be a special case for obtuse angles?

#

wait yeah for law of sines

#

idk, i didn't remember it off the top of my head but i just handwaved a diagram in my head so catshrug

upper karma
#

but could you prove it if you needed to?

dark sparrow
#

yes

#

i could put the diagram on paper

upper karma
#

okay

dark sparrow
#

i'm in the metro rn so that's. not exactly feasible atm

upper karma
#

oh ok

#

i can wait?

#

if you can do it later i mean

dark sparrow
#

oh you're expecting me to actually do it?

#

h

upper karma
#

sorry

#

never mind then

upper karma
#

Is the proof not done geometrically in the complex plane?

#

@upper karma no

#

or at least we're not talking about the same proof then

upper karma
#

Huh how would you define those functions then thonk

upper karma
#

@upper karma define which functions?

#

sin cos etc

#

using the unit circle and similar triangles

#

?

#

How do you define that algebraicly?

#

i am not sure what you mean

#

you use similar triangles

#

Nvm it

#

okay

#

@upper karma btw i think law of sines/cosines has been around way longer than the complex plane

#

but i might be wrong

#

Yes probably

#

@upper karma by like 8 centuries lol

#

Ok

#

Though how is that relevant sully

#

because the law of sines/cosines didn't come from thin air

#

they proved it using similar triangles and unit circle

#

same with other trig

#

trig was a thing way before complex numbers

#

Does that mean you can't prove it using complex numbers?

#

is that what i said?

#

No I am asking why it is relevant that these were discovered before complex numbers

#

In modern literatur nobody uses triangles

#

i was responding to

N/𝔄 : Huh how would you define those functions then thonk

#

they've been defined for a very long time

#

without using complex numbers

#

Yeah but geometrically with drawing pictures which I find is not a good proof

#

no not geometrically

#

you just draw a picture to illustrate it

#

the actual proof is algebraic

#

it is just way easier to follow with a picture

#

Okay so how do you define it algebraicly then without a picture

#

the wikipedia has the proof

#

Okay so how do you define it algebraicly then without a picture

#

there is no picture in those lines of text..?

#

They refer to the picture with that text

#

what picture

#

there is no picture mate

#

The thing you're telling me right now is that a and b and c in the equations are undefined if there is no picture they are referring to

#

look man i'm not looking to argue with you

#

if you don't understand that abc are the sides

#

then idk what to tell you

#

They are the sides they refer to in the picture

#

Is this that hard?

#

you could describe the sides with this sentence

#

A triangle labelled with the components of the law of sines. Capital A, B and C are the angles, and lower-case a, b, c are the sides opposite them. (a opposite A, etc.)

#

no picture needed

#

are you happy now or do you still want to keep being mad for some reason

#

Interesting that you think I'm mad. Anyways. That is still in reference to a picture. It does not mention how the circle is constructed or what exactly the sin and cos are in which context. No notion of a coordinate system. I'm just telling you that I find the proof using complex numbers more rigorous because there those things are all defined properly

#

what circle

#

Where you define sin and cos in..?

#

To make the triangle..?

#

can you link me the proof that you are talking about

#

with complex numbers

#

I don't have a link though it is quite easy to construct it using the construction of sin and cos with complex numbers

#

i mean can you find one online

#

it doesn't have to be yours

#

just the one that you're talking about so i know which one you are referring to

#

I can't seem to find it

#

unlucky i suppose

iron rain
#

A = (6, 0, 0), C = (0, 6, 0), TS = 8 and BP = (1/4)BT. How do I find the coordinates of point P? This is probably really easy but I’m just not seeing it.