#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 254 of 1
I need some help with this shit
I forgot what theorem i need to use for this type of problem
is it necessary i learn the csc, cot, sec identities for an end of year trig test im taking soon?
i would just learn everything my teacher taught me
What kind of parametric equation, in polar coordinate system, would describe the motion of - like, a motorcycle on a tiny planet that is racing forward with just a little turn?
does anyone know a good youtube video
that reviews the whole trignometry part
Whats "the whole trigonometry part" ?
@upper karma wouldn't that just be a circle of a certain diameter on a sphere?
If the velocity matched the angle so that its end position is its start, then yes.
lets just say its a constant 1 degree angle
@summer spire (someone else told me that this is a differential equation - I am hoping this isn't true 😬 )
beyond plotting a circle, I'm not even entirely sure what you're asking for tbh
the effect of the angle of the wheels would depend on the wheelbase and the size of the planet, but so long as everything is constant (speed, angle, etc) it doesn't sound super complicated
actually I don't even think speed would make a difference

I need help 😭
Im confused on what two possibles angles for angle B
I thought sinB is basically the angle and to find the other angle you inverse sin .77148 but it says it's incorrect and i don't understand
someone pls help :9
😭 *
the inverse sin cannot find an obtuse angle, instead it'll always give the supplementary acute angle
So arcsin of .77148 is 50.48697821132838, then other one will be 180 - 50.48697821132838 i think
isnt it cuz sin(A) = sin(180°-A)
so they're just asking for the supplementairy angle
@upper karma
@languid ingot was right i got it right but i'm not sure how to find c2
i used law of sines ( Sin angle B / side b = Sin angle C / side c )and got sin129.51/241.5 = sin14/c
then i crossed multiplied and got 241.5sin(14/sin(129.51
and that gave me 75.7266 but it says its wrong
probably rounding errors or something
oh yeah it was i rounded up angle C 2
Show that the distance of any point on the equilateral hyperbola x² - y² = a² to the center is the mean proportional between the focal radii.
can someone help me show that?
something that might help is that from geometry, m is the mean proportional of p and iff p/m = m/q
iff = if and only if btw
Draw a picture first
Show your diagram
I can’t send pictures on my phone :/
pls someone help 😦
Show that the distance of any point on the equilateral hyperbola x² - y² = a² to the center is the mean proportional between the focal radii.
can someone help me show that?
something that might help is that from geometry, m is the mean proportional of p and iff p/m = m/q
iff = if and only if btw
@stark ferry Lol are you using Canvas?
Is there a way to simplify $tan^{-1} (\frac {tan \theta }{e})$
Tāhā:
e is an arbitrary constant
@brave zephyr yes
Nope I’m down south in corpus
Are we allowed to post textbooks questions?
yes
Question: Lets say you're a bike rider, and you start out at 0,0 - and you pedel forward (y+), but keep a constant turn of 1 degree to the right (x+) ----- what is the radius of the circle you will eventually create?
ok, what if its just a particle, and not a 2 wheeled object?
then it's ill-defined, you need a length to have something like a 1-degree turned steering wheel
still trying to make sense of the bike turning radius, huh? 
the form of the question changed since I last saw it
curious what you're trying to work this out for
Yeah, it was this: imagine that you're a motorcyle on a tiny planet. is there a parametric equation in spherical coordinates (I think that'd be the easiest) to describe the motion of the bike at a constant 1 degree turn?
depends on the size of the planet and the speed of the bike I know .... but
I was trying to generalize it into the flat plane, and I'm still confused
because if I keep a constant 1 degree turn ---- well, its going to get into calculus here
lets say for each step forward, I then turn 1 degree - so that my path looks like a giant 360 faced polygon
well, a step forward then turn isn't CONSTANT - so, I reduce the step size - which reduces the radius
until - the step size is zero, so that the turn is CONSTANT, but then the circle is zero
😖 😕
anyone on
Is there a number system where |z|<0 can be true
no
@dark sparrow pls
I want to define negative lengths
why do you need that
minkowski space is kindaaaa like that
triangle inequality is just going to be ruined
if you allow |z| < 0
and triangle inequality is like the thing that makes metric spaces what they are
otherwise you'd get just crazy spaces
Hmm, but using complex numbers, letting the sides be complex and hypotenuse be real, |(a+bi)(a-bi)|=c^2, which if we generalise a, bi to complex numbers, we are using two complex numbers to represent the direction of the sides of the triangle, which hmm...
c here is just $|b-a|$ which is $\sqrt{(b-a)(\overline{b-a})}$
Element118:
too bad complex conjugates just behave weirdly
Opp/adj
okay, where's your triangle?
you need to use a right triangle to use trigonometric ratios
(the simple opp/adj ones)
you can't use a sector
okay, so what does that triangle give you for the coordinates?
Not sure
I know the radius (hypotensue) is 2
The angle is 3pi/10
?
Is x = 2/sin(3pi/10)
consider that triangle,
how would you find the length of the blue line?
sine of pi/5 would give me (blue line)/2
Blue line/2sin(pi/5) = 1
that's working against your goal, (also parentheses)
Mhm.
(because the point is that many units above the x-axis)
what ratio does tan give you?
Opp/adj
Ah OK.
you could use that, or you could use a simpler trig ratio directly
yeh
Ok.
Hi! I have a question. For exercises that involves finding the others trigonometry functions having the value of one, if it's negative, do I have to include the negative in the identities? My teacher says no.
what's "it"
The result. For example Tanx = 1.
oh like "here's the value of one trig function at x, find the values of the other five trig functions at the same x"?
to determine the signs of those, you need to know what quadrant x is in
for which extra information should be supplied
Oh, so my teacher was write. Thank you!
write 📝 is not the same as right ➡️
Is heron formula is applicable to a point in space
n o
@solid kiln You can start by realizing that the missing angles in that quadrilateral are congruent
@tacit karma i already solved it, thanks alot anyways:)
okay
@tacit karma cursed name
How is number 8 solved? Maybe just a link to a video or something would help me
Not sure about what I am telling you since the number seem a bit weird but; whats the "primary" relation in a right triangle?
it starts with p ;p
Well I would say Pythagorean theorem but as I said the numbers seem suspicious, let me see if thats actually the way to solve it
yeah it is definitely solvable with Pythagorean but the number you find is weird, just that
What was the exact number
Is this the right channel to ask about analytic geometry?
yea
I have an assignment question that isn't quite in a form that I can related to my notes ect, I just want to make sure my approach isn't just completely flawed
more asking if the logic I used to find n is valid than anything else
yea the logic is good
thanks
about the same. try both
use w/e you're most comfortable with
what is cot theta by definition
,rotate
what is sin
side opposite the angle that you are conducting the functions on over the hypotenus
so sine = opp/hyp
yes
hyp/opp
do you get it now
well that's not the question you're trying to answer
it says to find cot
but you're given csc
what i mean is i think the teacher marked the sides of the triangle wrong
1 sec
are the sides right
atleasxt the two
yeah that's right
what did the teacher do?
yeah that's wrong
^
good job
ty
now you can tell your teacher she's dum
ye
she has a some sort of memory loss so maybe thats why
did i do this correctly or the squareroot of 91 should had a negative infront? teacher key looks weird again
-ve since its below the x-axis
does the question specifically mention quadrant 4?
what's the teacher saying?
yees
hi! can anyone help me figure this problem out? you were supposed to apparently find the length of x using only these two values.
ps im only in the 8th grade algebra 1 so I'm not very familiar with geometry or trig
consider similar triangles
i have no idea what that means?
oof
so you aren't aware of geometry, trig or similar triangles
let us begin with what you do know related to this question?
nothing at all, they just gave me this
okay, after looking it up I kinda get it, but I don't know how it would help me
I don't really know, this was during a test, so I couldn't take a pic of it, and the picture I provided is what the test showed me
as in what you looked up
not sure why'd they give you that without teaching that stuff yet
what parts of geo do you actually know?
i know stuff about angles, cogruency and translations and stuff
i think the test was just to see what we know
hm yeah I know that part, but how would I use that to solve for x?
unlike congruent triangles, instead of corresponding sides being equal,
corresponding sides are in the same ratio
triangles ABC and DBA are similar
BD corresponds to AB
AB corresponds to BC
which gets you
BD/AB = AB/BC
32/x = x/52
oh!
ramonov:
to reach the same result
If A B C D are 4 points on a plane, of which neither 3 are colinear
A) how many lines are defined with thise points
B) how many triangles are defined by those points
This is the solution for a
But I have no clue how to solve it
They arent in a straight line?
yes indeed
now what gives you, is a leverage to do a neat and simple observation
in this case, that is, you can draw a unique line by choosing any 2 of the four points
emphasis on unique, specifically since no three are collinear
you get that?
,rccw
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages

and @white cradle while I can draw it and figure it out like that, I want to know how to use the approach shown in the solution
in the book
it is the problem number 170.
i didnt say draw it lol
i only said, by choosing any 2 of the 4 points, you will be defining a unique line
in which case, the number of lines you can draw would be the number of ways of choosing 2 points from 4 points
aka 4 choose 2, aka 4C2
oh, so that is what it means
thanks
and what about the next step
_
the 43 / 52
where do the 3 and 5 come from
you dont know what 4C2 means?
$^nC_r = \frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}$
FlynnXD:
it means from 4 points we choose 2
nCr is a general expression of choosing r objects from n objects
you can figure out this expression if you think about it
n is the number we choose from and r is the number of object we can chose
$n! = n(n-1)(n-2)...(2)(1)$
FlynnXD:
I have heard of those
so they just plugged in r=2 and n=4
but now I don't understand how we got 4-3 from that factorial
its 4*3
wont it be just 432*1
can someone help me with a problem. I know the answer, but I don't get why my method doesn't work for solving it
(4x3x2x1)/(2x1)(2x1) = (4x3)/(2x1)
oh
must go till four, see i wrote all the expansions lol
just follow them
and simplify
ok, I get it now
kk
look up "n choose r" online
and see how that formula is derived
logically, its simple
do I do the same for triangles but 4C3 ?
so angle T is 35 and angle A is 30 right?
so then if i draw a line connecting AT and another one connecting AB can I not use sin law to find AB, then use trig to find height of building
T and A are points, not angles
just for clarity, please mention the three vertices containing the angle,
as in angle ABC refering to the angle subtended at vertex B
wdym, wouldn't T and A be angles if I draw lines AT and AB, creating angle of elevation and depressin
its just a wrong way of writing, either draw the angles explicitly and label them as T and A
or mention all three vertices
ill do it for u, what you mean by T is angle ATC and A is angle BAC where C is the base of the building
how would you use sin law, the angles dont belong to the same triangle even
drop out the laws and shit for a moment, and think bout it logically
can't you do 1.6/sin 30 = x/sin 35
they dont belong to the same triangles
Oh right
see, from triangle ABC, you can get x in terms of AC
using a simple trig ratio
and in triangle ATC, you can get a relation between TC and AC again
eliminate AC and youll find x
try it
just to make sure, angle ABC is 60 then?
yes
yes
so then I would do x/tan 30 = tan 35 (x) + tan 35 (1.6)
i think ive made a mistake
hm?
cuz when i do that, i get 0.3x = 0.646
meaning the building is 2.15m tall, which is not the right answer
what is the ans
whats that
they flipped the angles
like instead of ATC being 35 they're taking TAC as 35
some error
it doesn't make sense for tan 35 = H+1.6/x
ye they used the wrong angle that's all
dw, your work is correct, given the question you showed me
guys I need a proofing problem
oop
have*
for this question, it is given that they have an identical side and angle
which leads me to believe I can say that CAE = CBD because Equilateral triangle
actually nvm
or could I say similar because of reflexive properties
how can I get good at geometry?
I hate it
especiallly the proofs
I am now stuck on this problem because I have no idea how to even approach it
Lines a and b are parallel and passing by line c. Point A belongs to a, B to b and C to c. How many planes is it possible to make from all the points and lines?
I have no idea how to even start doing this
I need some worksheets
Its to calculate angles and lengths of triangles using sin and cos and tan
And using the law of sins and cos
Hope im not bothering you all
i can attempt to throw one together
i need only one piece of information
how many problems?
@upper karma
if you don't answer, i'm gonna make you one with around 20
ok so wait
do you already have some problems and want me to help you with those
or do you want me to make you a worksheet with some problems
@upper karma
...
so.....

i want you to give me a worksheet with the questions
The sin graph will help if you know it's sketch at least?
I understand the restriction is from 0 - pi, and I need to find the theta that makes it equal .25?
You have to use the calculator, we can't do it by hand
What would I input
Sup?:
make sure the calc is in radian mode
Okay, part a is easy, what do u think about part b
is it + or -
?
Sorry
Yes the answer is +0.256 radians, for the second answer, it would be better if I show u the graph
so u know what's going on
ok sounds good
u know the graph right?
The graph of sin?
Yes
yes I know that one
Okay.
sin(x) right?
Yes.
ok I got that
We want to know where the value of sin(x) is 1/4
And it has two possible answers in the domain 0 < x < pi as you can see in the graph
yes, can u think of how?
look at the x axis
You know the point of origin is (0,0) yes?
yes
double .25226
would that be the answer
No
the distance from 0 to .25 is .25
I'm talking about the gap, ie the difference b/w 0 and 0.2526
Yes.
Do you see where I have the "?" on the x axis?
Well the gap from the "?" to pi is the same as the gap from 0 to 0.2526
No, it's not 180 - 0.25
It's pi - 0.2526
ok
did u understand?
Yes that makes sense
Okay then
Would I write pi - .2526
Yes.
And you can see both answers are in the range of 0 < x < pi from the graph or by calculation
yes
okay
so what about the all real numbers
which is how often it completes a full rotation
Yes.
So I need to know the period of sin(.25)?
Just the period of $\sin(\theta)$
Sup?:
LOok at your question, it's written sin(theta) = 0.25
2pi right
So I know the period of sin(x) is 2pi, and we need to find all the points that y = .25 within that?
No.
For part (a), our restriction was that theta or x had to be between 0 and pi when sin(theta) or sin(x) = 0.25. For part b, there is no restriction.
That's all it's saying
Wouldn't there be infinite answers then
Yes and we need to write a formula for it
that's all
Btw do you have the numeric value for the 2nd answer?
it was pi - 0.2526, can u calculate that
?
Yeah it's right
Simplify what?
Okay, now for part b, let's get down to business.
I'm confused as to what to write for the formula
I'll write it down and also explain
ok thanks
Or maybe you could write it after I'm done explaining
The period is 2pi, so we know for sure that the sin function will repeat it's value after 2pi radians. It could also repeat earlier, like sin(theta) is 1/4 at 0.2526 and also at 2.88. The difference is not 2pi. But these are the only two answers.
So we separate them both. For 0.2526, if we keep adding 2pi to it, then the sin function will have a value of 1/4
makes sense
And now you also keep addin 2pi to 2.88
You have to keep adding 2pi, that's the hint for the equation
We could add 2pi one time
Or 2 times
3 times, etc
Forget the =0.25
so just .2526 + pi(x)
x is the number of times we add 2pi?
Yes, and that's an integral value. We could add 0 times, 1 times, 2 times, etc..
Thing is, we could also subtract 2pi
Because we can go backwards
I suggest replacing x with n.
Where n is any integer.
So that's your solution
$0.2526 + n(2\pi) : n \in \mathbb {Z}$
.2526 + 2pi(n) and 2.88 + 2pi(n)
Sup?:
Do the same for the other answer
Yes
So there you go.
$2.88 + n(2\pi) : n \in \mathbb {Z}$
Sup?:
what does Z stand for
np
good bye
What’s a locus?
,w locus
Oh thanks
,rccw
what is this shape
physics textbook swim pool
both sides are rectangles
So it's just an oblong?
(idk the proper name.)
rectangular prism, thats the one
Well are the parrellel sides different length?
Vol = b*w*h
width
It'll be easier if you google this yourself man
Just google: volume of a rectangular prism
its not a rectangular prism
he said that the parellel sides were same length
what, you said they were the same -_-
Okay. Well in that case take the average.
(of the two sides that are of different length)
and you can apply the rectangle formula. It is often best to get a geometric visualization for this, so a youtube video would really really help
2167.28?
maybe? i can't read your handwriting
wait you just said they were both squares?
ahk that makes more sense
just a trapezoidal prism then
2167.275 sounds about right
Uh math noob here might be a dumb question but is
Csc = -2 is in Quadrant 4 equivalent to Cot = -√3
or is it just √3?
@valid dagger just looking at x in [0,2pi), csc(x)=-2 with x being in quad 4 does imply x=11pi/6, making cot(x)=-sqrt(3)
Oki thank youu
hi can someone explain small angle approximation to me
like i know sin x is approximately equal to x but how does sin 1rad=1rad???
So I have these 2 circles with radiuses 2 and 3. Now I need to create formule for the line which passes through A and B where P is at (0, 0)
I have done it so many times and I still don’t get it right
Hello I need help finding h2
ok
y 12
20*
ye
Rounded is 11.47
Hey hey
I've got a pyramid I know that's it's squared, <SAC is 45° and AD=DC=BC=BA=20
How do I get SO
I've encountered a different problem now
How do I get anything from this rectangle?
I need to get the volume
Excuse me for my bad english
@coral sapphire Sorry for tagging, can you help?
What do you know about 30 60 90 triangles
?
What about AC
it's xroot of 3
Correct
use the pythagorean theorem
not necessarily
So I have these 2 circles which touch each other with radiuses 2 and 3. Then there is a line which touches both of the circles in points A and B. Now, I want to create the line in form y = ax for the touching (tangent?) line through A and B. Point P is (0, 0)
Type 3: You know the long leg (the side across from the 60-degree angle). Divide this side by the square root of 3 to find the short side. Double that figure to find the hypotenuse.
got it
so now what
How do I get AB or BC are the corners 90 degrees?
Sorry to resend this again because it gives me 11.47 and that was marked wrong. (I’m trying to find h2)
See?
@mortal heart 20sin35
@rich wolf Do you know the formula how to calculate the volume of CAMB?
AB = 2 , M is a mid-point
What shape is that
a cube
triangular prism I guess
No
Didn’t work again
11.47
Imma try again with that
I said 11.47 the first time you asked 😄
Yeah I know I had 11.46 so I guess I confuse it lol
Sorry for that
Anyways it doesn’t matter because they changed problems
Ohw
I need help on numbers 11 and 14 please.
mAngles:
JKM + MKL = JKL
Hmm...
Mhm
Why is arccos(-root2/2) not -45? It says the answer is 135.
what is cos(-45°)
Wouldn’t it be -1/root2?
why?
Cuz cos of 45 is 1/root2 so if it’s negative 45 than just put a negative sign right?
Not really
Try drawing the graph is cos(x)
See where the value is negative
(goes below X axis)
Yes
Because cosine is positive in the 4th quadrant
cos(-x) = cos(x)
So where will the graph first be negative?
After the -90 and 90
alright so now try to figure out what value of cos we should put so that it comes as negative 1/√2
135 and -135
and why
You tell me
-1?
Right
So try doing this:
from 180°, move the point x degrees on the x-axis and see where it ends up
Ok nevermind with graphs then, think back to the unit circle
Wait 180 degrees is (-1,0) so cos would be -1
Cuz it’s (cos,sin)
And -45 degrees would be 315 and that’s 7pi/4 and it’s positive root2/2
And 135 is negative root2/2 or 3pi/4 because the cosine value for the second quadrant is negative
Oh okay sorry I got confused with the 180-x stuff
sorry I confused you with it lol
I literally had no clue what to do I was just staring at my graph lol
It's just the intuition behind where the +ve/-ve thing in the quadrants comes from
Oh okay
If you want to try to check out the parts where it's positive and where it's negative
Wait why do we do cos of 45 when doing cos of 135
It’s cos of 135 so when we try to figure it out we can look at the 45-45-90 triangle and use cos45 which is root2/2 and that 135 is in second quadrant which means x is negative which means it’s -root2/2
But what’s the reason we use cos(45)?
Not sure what you mean lol
Wait
Let me see how I can word this
Wait what does this mean cos(135°) = cos(180° - 45°) = -cos(45°)
Let me draw a diagram
Okay
Yes
now if we do cos(180° - 45°) think that we're starting from the negative x-axis and drawing the 45°
It would end up in the 2nd quadrant, where cosine is negative
Right
And we also formed a triangle with angle 45° here so we get the cosine from it
Yes
I guess what's what you were asking on how cos(45°) shows up here?
Yes
And again the negative sign is there because the triangle is in the 2nd quadrant
Yea
Is your doubt cleared?
Yea I think I understand for the most part imma finish off my homework and I’ll be back if I got any more questions
Alright I’ll see u later
Thx u too
oh sorry my bad
can someone help me with this ? I am not sure if i am doing it right.
$(a-b)^2 \neq a^2 - b^2$
ramonov:
ooohh thanks
I just had a quick question about Trig
So I’m on a scientific calculator and I want to do SinX = 7/25
Do I have to do SinX/1 equals 7/25 and then cross multiply to get X?
Wait no that wouldn’t work
@limber anchor you have to use inverse sine
@limber anchor lmao
Wait so would it be .28?
Degrees or rad?
Degrees
What calculator?
TI-84 Plus
That’s what I did
I don’t think mine says that when I do something like that
Okay so it’s 16.26 but I round down to 16?
I think I do because it says I need to go round to the nearest whole number
I really hope I don’t fail this test
So the ratios for a reference angle would just be like 7/25 right do I even have to solve anything?
@junior hazel do you still need help with this
@dark sparrow yes
okay what's giving you trouble
what do you mean
do you not know how to tell which of these angles are bigger and which ones are smaller?
ANGLES are not SIDES
@junior hazel you still need help?
@junior hazel i think i can help you out
let me know if this helps
i tried to make it intuitive for you
by drawing it out
@junior hazel does my video make intuitive sense to you
so how come you keep confusing angles with sides
Hey I have a math question, its from a quiz I took yesterday
Okay so for this question, Can I just subtract the area of the hallway+kitchen and bathroom from the total area?
also, for the hallway and kitchen could I just do 8x18 to find the area of the two?
for your first question, im confused as to what area you need to solve for
but for the second one yes, if the diagram is drawn correctly
May I ask for advice/suggestion on solving this problem: https://math.stackexchange.com/q/3578871/721644 ?
Basically I had to find the area of the two bedrooms and the living room to find the cost of something which is a diff problem
!15m
what would be the easiest way of $finding M \epsilon AB so that AM=2MB, A(-1,1) and B(5,7)$
Vulpea:
have you heard of the section formula
you have AM:MB=2:1
now use the section formula
never heard of it, thanks
@quiet mason i've found the formula but if the ratio is 2:1 ==> m=2 and n equals 1?
for $M=(\frac{(mx_2+nx_1)}{(m+n)}, \frac{(my_2+ny_1)}{(m+n)})$
Vulpea:
thanks
Ann:
Hi, how do I do question 1? I don’t understand how you use the original equation of f(x) to solve
f(x) is only drawn on the graph. technically there is no "original equation of f(x)"
So then how do I use it?
What's the transformations on f?
The domain of f(x) is the interval on the x axis containing it. You can see the graph goes from x=-6 to x=2, so the domain is [-6, 2].
The range is the interval on the y-axis containing f(x), so from y = -2 to y = 2, or [-2, 2].
Then you have to look at the transformations in (a), (b), and (c) and see how they affect the domain and range
Alright
But I don’t know how to use the original
I know the domain and range of the original but I don’t know how that helps me
Do I use the values from the graph of the original?
Think about what 2f(x) looks like compared to f(x). 2f(x) is just two times f(x) at every point on the graph. So if you go look at the graph at x = 2, you can see that the y value, also known as f(2), is y = 2.
So then if you were to look at 2f(x) at x = 2, you would see 2 times what you saw before. 2*2 = 4.
So 2f(x) is the whole graph scaled by two on the y-axis
Could I get help with this? I'm in an introductory university geometry course and we have just covered Menaleus and Cevas Theorem
Similarly, f(x-5) is the whole graph shifted to the right by five units.
yes correct
Oh thank you
np
^^?
@dark sparrow i tagged you (explaining just so hopefully you aren't annoyed) because i wanted to ask you in specific if you remember things like the proofs for obtuse angles for law of cosines/law of sines?
uh
does... there even need to be a special case for obtuse angles?
wait yeah for law of sines
idk, i didn't remember it off the top of my head but i just handwaved a diagram in my head so 
but could you prove it if you needed to?
okay
i'm in the metro rn so that's. not exactly feasible atm
Is the proof not done geometrically in the complex plane?
@upper karma no
or at least we're not talking about the same proof then
Huh how would you define those functions then 
@upper karma define which functions?
sin cos etc
using the unit circle and similar triangles
?
How do you define that algebraicly?
i am not sure what you mean
you use similar triangles
Nvm it
okay
@upper karma btw i think law of sines/cosines has been around way longer than the complex plane
but i might be wrong
Yes probably
@upper karma by like 8 centuries lol
Ok
Though how is that relevant 
because the law of sines/cosines didn't come from thin air
they proved it using similar triangles and unit circle
same with other trig
trig was a thing way before complex numbers
Does that mean you can't prove it using complex numbers?
is that what i said?
No I am asking why it is relevant that these were discovered before complex numbers
In modern literatur nobody uses triangles
i was responding to
N/𝔄 : Huh how would you define those functions then
they've been defined for a very long time
without using complex numbers
Yeah but geometrically with drawing pictures which I find is not a good proof
no not geometrically
you just draw a picture to illustrate it
the actual proof is algebraic
it is just way easier to follow with a picture
Okay so how do you define it algebraicly then without a picture
@upper karma https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_sines#Proof
the wikipedia has the proof
Okay so how do you define it algebraicly then without a picture
there is no picture in those lines of text..?
They refer to the picture with that text
what picture
there is no picture mate
The thing you're telling me right now is that a and b and c in the equations are undefined if there is no picture they are referring to
look man i'm not looking to argue with you
if you don't understand that abc are the sides
then idk what to tell you
They are the sides they refer to in the picture
Is this that hard?
you could describe the sides with this sentence
A triangle labelled with the components of the law of sines. Capital A, B and C are the angles, and lower-case a, b, c are the sides opposite them. (a opposite A, etc.)
no picture needed
are you happy now or do you still want to keep being mad for some reason
Interesting that you think I'm mad. Anyways. That is still in reference to a picture. It does not mention how the circle is constructed or what exactly the sin and cos are in which context. No notion of a coordinate system. I'm just telling you that I find the proof using complex numbers more rigorous because there those things are all defined properly
what circle
Where you define sin and cos in..?
To make the triangle..?
can you link me the proof that you are talking about
with complex numbers
I don't have a link though it is quite easy to construct it using the construction of sin and cos with complex numbers
i mean can you find one online
it doesn't have to be yours
just the one that you're talking about so i know which one you are referring to
I can't seem to find it
unlucky i suppose
A = (6, 0, 0), C = (0, 6, 0), TS = 8 and BP = (1/4)BT. How do I find the coordinates of point P? This is probably really easy but I’m just not seeing it.