#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 251 of 1
yeah (1) gives you 25-odd million in^3
and you should only divide by 2150.42 once
does your textbook show the volume of the four cylinders in cubic inches being divided by a bushel thrice?
@dark sparrow do you remember all these identities btw or do you look them up
i happen to know them off the top of my head bc i've used them a lot
i mean apart from cos(a+-b), sin(a+-b), cos(2a), sin(2b)
so you know for example like
sin x - sin y?
do you mean sin(x)-sin(y) = 2sin((x-y)/2)cos((x+y)/2)
@dark sparrow yes it does
that's weird.
However, I think you should see the derivations to understand them better
uh
can you take a picture of what you're looking at @buoyant hinge
i'm just curious
@dark sparrow damn you are a nerd
i can't remember that stuff at all
even tho i've only been learning for a week
trig
if u know the derivation u can logically know why it's like that
a week ain't enough
why not
i've been doing shit with trig in one form or another for years
nothing wrong with not remembering stuff perfectly if you've only been at it for so little time
seriously don't worry about it
uh.
wow what
this is fucked up lmao
taken at face value, a bushel according to them is a unit of LENGTH, not volume!
Lmao
I'm good with math.. no wiz or anything. I took calculus in high school but promptly forgot all of that. But pretty much anything under I'm pretty good with.. and I tried to reconcile what they had and couldn't figure out what they were doing to get there
Because if you calculate what they have written.... it doesnt even equal what they show
So I didnt know if I'd fallen further than I thought and was missing something vital
yeah as i said
this is fucked up lmao
If you’re worried, you can always check the dimensions/write them
Like this
Vtotal = 4πr²h
Vtotal = 4π(6 ft)²(32 ft)
Vtotal = 4π(36 ft²)(32 ft)
Vtotal = 14469.12 ft³
1 ft = 12 in
Vtotal = 14469.12(12 in)³
Vtotal = 14469.12(1728 in³)
Vtotal = 25002639.36 in³
Vtotal/bushel
= 25002639.36in³/2150.42in³
= 11626.86
The final dimension should be as what you expect
which here is no unit, because you’re just counting how many bushels fit in 4 cylinders
That's what he had as his answer. When I checked it and saw how far it was off, I looked at the teachers key and that's when my world started not making sense
Because to get their answer you have to divide 11626.86 by 3. And i have no clue why they did that... and not even show that's what they did
Thank you all for confirming for me that i didnt miss anything and their answer key is just wrong. Makes me highly suspect of the rest of it
Just believe in yourself, books can be unreliable sometimes
their answer is majorly screwed and your answer of 11626.86 is correct
Thanks. I've been wrong before, atleast according to my wife.
Do you know what cos(α-β) equates to
yes
use it then
There is question like: find sin (x/2), cos(x/2), and tan(x/2) for each set of conditions:
sin x = -3/5 and pi < x < 3pi/2
Ik how to plug in to the half angle formula thing. but how would i would like know if sin (x/2), cos(x/2), and tan(x/2) should have negative signs?
use that they tell you about x to determine which quadrant x/2 is in
oh wait x/2 will always be in II quadrant?
yes
okay is it same to assume:
if x is in first then x/2 is always in first
if x is in second then x/2 is always in first
if x is in third then x/2 is always in second
if x is in fourth then x/2 is always in second?
why do you even need to assume anything
take pi < x < 3pi/2 and divide through by 2
or yknow any other quadrant info you may be given
why not do that instead of these weird heuristics
okay
think about it this way:
think of moving x around the circle and x/2 changing as x changes
when x gets to pi/2, x/2 is still trailing behind in the first quadrant
when x gets to pi, x/2 finally made it to pi/2, so any point less than pi results in x/2 in the first quadrant
as x continues to go around the circle, x/2 still remains in the second quadrant. when x gets to 2pi, x/2 finally made it to pi
okay
espo that is honestly overcomplicated
like seriously
pi/2 < x/2 < 3pi/4
so x/2 is in the second quadrant
i don't understand why that's insufficient as far as clarity goes
some people work better with numbers
others work better with a geometrical understanding
telling someone "look, the numbers work out this way" doesn't always help
sometimes it helps to get an intuitive understanding of what's happening
if i’m solving for cosine theta
and it gives me 2nd quadrant
is the answer going to be negative
cosine is (1,4) positive (2,3) negative
so cosine is forced to be negative
did i just answer my own question
can someone make sure im doing this right
didnt check the arithmetic but looks good
bet
how do i find angle theta from the given cosine value?
that’s question 2
cosine is = .1736
do i do inverse?
Yes
do i use sinh or cosh
wouldn’t sin(theta) be -0.5?
other than that looks good to me
how do i calculate $\sin 6^\circ \sin 42^\circ \sin 66^\circ \sin 78^\circ.$
polynomial:
i’d just chuck em in a calculator
oh
i’d start with the sum and distance formulas, do you know those?
not distance, difference
sorry i’m very sleep deprived
is it ok just to write this as .5
i mean probably unless your teacher’s a prick
sorry i meant sum and difference
she does this stuff with margin of error
ok so
yes
okay
so first we have 6 degrees
can you think of standard angles that sum or subtract to 6?
no?
@limpid tide what are they
?
probably a dumb question but to find tangent from a reference angle
i divide sine/cosine
with keep change flip right
because they’re both fractions
@limpid tide ??
dude
calm
he’s probably not on right now
pinging someone won’t make people respond faster
just probably piss them off
people have lives my dude
lol easy for you to say asking easy questions that anyone can answer in 5 sec
yeah that’s probably why people answer them
yeah so go away asking your easy questions when anyone can answer them and telling others as if their situation is the same lol
🤔
hmm
how would i find sine, cosine, and tan of -5pi/6
when that’s not an actual radical
idk how to make it one
can u not
im gonna assume i have to convert that radical to a negative degree
then switch that negative degree to a positive one
actually i think im stupid
i don’t know how to convert radicals to degrees
@upper karma back to what Sam said, think of angles that can get you 6
You already know quite a few special angles already, think about how you can relate them
@upper karma are you meaning to say radians? Just remember that pi radians = 180 degrees
And you can convert with that
@marble topaz i mean, i know how to get 60, just not a "good" angle for both of the values
one of the values will be "bad"
need help in voice chat.
@upper karma i think you wrote the question wrong
the standard question has sums and differences not multiply
question
@fleet wolf no... i didn't...
It’s actually fucked
to calculate sin(6)
@upper karma then you're doing something wrong
well i am too so idk lol
@upper karma
This guy did it
Tedious as balls
the response below is like 4 lines
hmm it seems like it is just multiple applications of sun to product
how's that tedious lol
is there a way to split any triangle into two right trinagles computationally
i know all of the sides (a, b and c)
@upper karma
I would suggest cos law to find an angle, then sohcahtoa once you're dealing with right triangles
@upper karma search up how to find altitudes of triangles
Hey
I’m pretty sure I already asked this question and it was answered but honestly I forgot how to do it either way so here ;
How would I do #5?
What does it mean for two shapes to be similar?
i've got questions on how to do certain geoemtry problems wiith similar figures and dialations and i can send pics if i can be guided in the right direction on how to get the answer
@here
@verbal summit still need help?
@wind heart
to find the ratio, get the side of the first polygon, and then divide it by the second one with its corresponding side
so for your problem:
we know |AB| = 20. and |PQ| = 25 because |SR| and |PQ| are congruent
thus we need to just do: 20/25 or 20:25, which would simplify to 4:5
so now we have the ratio we can just multiply it by the original one to get the second one. for e.g.,
|AD| = 14, so |PS| = 14*(4/5) = 11.2
np
If they are right angles then B will lie on CD right?
nvm i got it
How to find tan and arctan using unit circle
draw the tangent line to the circle at the point (1,0), a.k.a. the line x=1. call it "the tangent axis"
for all θ that aren't π/2 or 3π/2, the line passing through θ's point on the unit circle (i.e. (cos(θ), sin(θ))) and the origin will intersect the tangent axis at one and only one point
the y coordinate of this point is tan(θ)
does that answer your question or would you like an illustration
@blazing panther
👻
👻
how do i calculate radius from degrees in my calculator
like
451°10'
Texas TI 84 plus ce-t
@upper karma recall that 180 degrees is equal to pi radians
That should enable you to convert pretty easily
in calculator?
"radius" did you mean radians
are you trying to convert 451°10' to radians
bc that'll be (451 + 10/60) * pi/180
oh yeah I got that
i see what I was doing wrong
I got 7.87434 rad now
🙂
ty for help
This can only be done through calculator right?
wdym
Formula can be written, but the calculating, through calculator right?
unless you're allergic to calculations with four-digit numbers
You could absolutely do it w/pencil and paper
you can do the calculation by hand just fine
it's gonna be a bit painful but it's absolutely doable
let me try
okay i might not do it if it's painful
xd
I can use calculator on tests, so I guess i'll just stick with that
How do I deal with a question like this when there are no solutions?
Hope this is the right channel
why do you say there are no solutions
Sorry, meant infinitely many solutions
@hot pumice say what y has to be in terms of x
so in this case, y = x
but sometimes y might have to be 4x
or nx
so y=nx, where in this case n = 1
Ahh right I get it, ty
In sin(x), sinh(x), arcsin(x) and arcsinh(x).. Is the x in rad or in degree?
Mention me if someone answer
@upbeat trail it doesn't make sense to plug in angle measurements into the arc trig functions... as for the non arc functions, either are fine
Alright thanks
Can I math god help me complete the squares with circles
what issue are you having with completing the square?
if there is 5 green and 7 yellow pencils the chance of getting 2 yellow pencils is 16%?
Result:
0.31818181818182
anyone good with probability
hey so i have an easy question about circles and arcs but i forgot all the properties of arcs would this be the place to ask
presumably
cool
how would i find the measure of angle D and angle A
my old math binder fell apart so i lost all my notes on arcs, no other info given in the problem
Hey @lyric summit, so if you want to find the distance between M and N, you can try to visualize some squares in the diagram, like this:
Yea
oh
why r heRe
ok
Welll
Multiply by root 2
Do that for both
Then add
And
Booom
Big brain
Right there
and is it 12
I got 24*sqrt(2)
oh
thx both of yall
:)))))
yw 🙂
:)
Hi
How do I complete 6 7 and 8?
Let’s see
Does is 6. 15, is 7. 60, and is 8. 8?
7 isn't 60
Yes!
yes, 6 and 8 were correct
quick question
for arcsin x = theta, why is it restricted to the first and fourth quadrants of the unit circle
arcsin is defined as the inverse of sin where sin has been restricted to the interval [-pi/2,pi/2]
think about it this way:
URGENT
do you remember the definition of a function?
mhm
HOW WOULD I FIND THE RAIDUS OF THIS CIRCLE please
sin takes in any angle
mhm
do you know what the range of sin is?
like the function?
how do I graph
,graph sin(x)
-1 to 1 right
$,graph sin(x)$
analyst:
lol
yes thank you texit
it's always -1 to 1
mhm
however, if arcsin(x) is going to be a function, it can only give one output for every input
so if you want to know where sin(x) = 1
you do arcsin(1)
but it can only give one output
mhm
even though sin(x) = 1 at pi/2, 5pi/2, 9pi/2, etc.
so it only gives the answer that's in quadrants one and four
does that make sense?
mhm
@noble coral
I have an answer for you, but it's not rigorous
like it isn't a proof, but it gives you the answer
since the large box is 6x6, you can put 9 2x2 boxes in it
the middle box is going to have one corner touch the bottom left box and one corner touch the center of the circle
and the radius of that box is going to be
yes
but we aren’t given if the TOP square box is a square
The problem is the little segment
yea
But, maybe you can use pythagoras
Uhm I don’t get it
sqrt(2) × (4 - r) = r
The middle triangle is a 45 45 90 with hypothenuse R and sides 4 - R
So uh what’s the answer?
r = 4× sqrt2 / sqrt2 + 1
@deft ingot
ok
im really sorry
but can u explain it to me step by step
I beg you
Im soooo so sorry
hmm
like starting from the first picture
see that middle triangle i made?
Which box?
but I asked some guy and he said that it was a square cuz of the point at the raidus
look
Yeah it is a box
Middle triangle i made there
Hypothenuse is R
their sides is 6 - 2 - R
Do pythagoras
ok
r = 4× sqrt2 / sqrt2 + 1
@deft ingot
where does the one come from
R + Rsqrt2 = 4sqrt2

How do we pronounce\
$\arcsin 0.5$
PristineWolf:
How would you pronounce it
Jk about that part
Lmao don't joke in trig pls
except kaynex isn't really jk'ing
I am in the sense that you wouldn't pronounce that like that
Rokabe I wanna ask you some stuff but awk
Imma finish reviewing for tomorrow's French test and I'll come back
'bad' questions get 'bad' answers
Me?
what else were you expecting other than
arc sine zero point five
I just wanted to know if the part "arc" in arcsine was pronounced the same or smth diff
just read it normally
Well you don't read "cos"
Lmao if you say cos in my country it is REALLY close to a swear word here
😂
cosine
I only ever read cos
when speaking fast i pronounce cos as cuss
But I also read sine
saying sin is a sin
Imma gtg n come back
shine for sinh is quite fun
you say shine instead of sinch?
yeh
what about cosh
cosh
just cosh for that
tanh?
(th)an or fan?
been a while
"tan AITCH"
don't think i've ever had to pronounce it
never heard of than or fan, interesting
"hyperbolic tangent"
i pretty much go with how khan would say it
thfan sounds like so much effort
geez that first vid when i searched it was horrid
guys this last question is one of those (whats 2+2 hense solve the surface area of the moon) type questions
um what?
expanding & using trig identities may get you somewhere
expanding
which trig identit(ies) do you know?
not tan(x)
ye that
sin^2x + cos^2x = 1
in addition to basic exponent/distribution laws
should be all that you need
no you confused D with sine(D)
(and d with D)
uh
im leaerning special angle
i dont think my teacher was asking for that
oh
thats radian
thats why
@upper karma special angle ez
yeah but then
this isn't a special angle
WHY WOULD MY TEACHER
put this in
a google docs
if it wasnt special angle
Can’t you find it with Inverse sine
**Special Angles and Unknown Angles **
Yea
the thing is we haven't learned how to use einverse sinee
Fr?
yep
Just use calculator it u can
then just write arcsin(that frac)
i have my casio in
then, i guess
wdym if you didn't know the ratio?
since you're given all 3 sides you can use whichever ratio you want
the ratio would only involve 2 sides
PristineWolf:
Can we call this $\arcsin$ sin inverse
Or is it just for sin^-1
arcsin & sin^-1 refer to the same function. Referring to either as inverse sin is misleading. Remember that talk I gave about making a certain restriction on the domain of sin in order for it to be invertible
rokabe..
Pls
Give me a moment then
Lemme finish math hw n come
Guess we're not ending
I won’t relent til you stop asking trig qs
So you mean you're not leaving me confused?

@weary drift
你要什么?

Hello. I have 2 questions. I want to ask my first question;
The number of pi can be 3.14 or 180. Is pi's 3.14 value in radians or degrees?
I have researched in many sources, many say different things
You can never truncate digits of pi and still have its exact value. Almost never do it. pi is approx 3.14 but not 3.14
pi is the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter. And pi radians = 180 degrees
The number of pi can be 3.14 or 180.
no
any resource that says "pi = 180" outright is not a resource ever worth reading
pi radians = 180 degrees. I don't understand this sentence. pi radian must be equal to a radian value, right?
rad & deg are units describing angle measurements. The above relation gives how to convert between the two units
In other words, does pi number have 2 values as degrees and radians?
Can we use the number pi in radians or degrees
I'm so confused 😄
no, you're overthinking it
pi is pi. it's a number. it's equal to the circumference of a circle whose diameter is 1.
it's approximately equal to 3.14159. and that doesn't depend on what units are attached to it.
radians and degrees are units of angle
it's not like "pi degrees" is not a valid angle for whatever reason
you can have a length of π meters, a timespan of π hours, a volume of π liters, whatever
sometimes we could write 180 instead of pi. I am trying to understand the logic of this
if you see it as "writing 180 instead of pi" then there is no logic to it
because pi and 180 are two very different numbers. they differ by about 176.86
I've never seen trigonometry before. I'm trying to understand some things myself😄
because i need this informations about trigonometry
can i post a photo here?
@dark sparrow
sure
Ok so
ignore the stuff in the middle
do you understand what's going on on the circumference of the circle?
No 😄
ok
So it's a new way of defining angles
we're used to degrees
360 degrees in a circle correct?
Yes
but it's kind of arbitary, 360 just happens to divide into alot of nice factors so it's useful in that way
but it's still arbitrary
this other system uses a unit called a radien
which you'll notice is really really close to the word radius
the definition of a radien is that if you take the radius of a circle and lay it out on the circumference of the circle
it'll sweep out some angle
and that angle is 1 radien
there are 2pi radiens in a circle
so if I take the length of a radius
r
and multiply that by 2 pi
i'll have swept out a full circle
which makes sense, because the circumference of a circle is 2pi*r
take some time to read out what I wrote and if you're still confused lemme know
well more exactly
the angle swept out by laying 1 radius on the circumference is 1 radien
pi radiens is half a circle yes
Pi radiens
man thank you very much
both of them are angle measurements
And you too @dark sparrow
Can someone help on how’d I go about doing this
I want to say so far this is right
b,c are wrong
Is b 35 and c 145
same methods as what you were doing before
the horizontal bars are extra thick but just treat like every other line
° yes
And than 70 for o
yeh
Is it n 60 k 70
yeah
B and C are incorrect
Than how would I get it if I don’t do 180-39
So 94
yeh
Vertical angles
why did you erase those 48°s
actually y is supp to 132
same idea as the other parts you've just completed
48 didn’t seem right
why not?
^
Y isn't 132
Yes
And 180-85=a?
where did you get 85
180-47-48
also, if you know that alternate interior angles are congruent and corresponding angles are congruent, you’re pretty much done
Is it 132?
is 'what' 132?
yep
Well there’s a d and it’s out of place I think it’s 21
where?
c is still wrong
How
b and d are wrong as well
b and d are right
Is it 86
yea
be careful with which lines are actually parallel when applying the alt angles theorem
So what about d
D = 94° is fine
D not b
B = 94° is also fine
So is d 94
How’s it 94
all angles in a triangle add to 180
alternate angles on parallel lines.
also ^
if you calculated E first
and all those should be consistent
the ones in the centre area?
Ya
well firstly r is wrong
be careful with which lines are actually parallel when applying the alt angles theorem
68 r
yes
So what about p it’s on a line with 5 which don’t make sense
The p is on a line with 5
5 other angles?
thats an s
O...
you need to find that angle too
yeh
$sphere: (x-1)^2+(y-2)^2+(z+1)^2=9 \ curve: l(t)=(1+t,2+t^2,3+3t^2), \quad t\inℝ$
how do I find the shortest distance from the sphere surface to the curve?
Squik:
Does anyone know shortcuts for the problem
Cos(x+pi/4)-Cos(x-pi/4)
I’m looking for things that I can cancel instead of having to do two product to sum formulas
did you mean sum to product?
you should only need to do it once
(also quite simple to apply angle sum identities, which is where those formulae are derived from)
What are angle sum identities? Like double angle and half angle identities?
Isn’t that Sin(a+b) = Sin(a)Cos(b)+Cos(a)Sin(b)?
lower case, but yes
that is an angle sum identity, or similar name (compound angles)
Yea, are there any shortcuts for those, so I don’t have to do the whole formula?
I would imagine that there is a shortened version of those
the 'shortcut' for that specific question would be applying the
sum to product identity directly
How exactly is that done?
Whoah, that’s wack
ramonov:
Ah, I gotcha. I solved it but it took a lot of legwork
just send your problem
@drowsy walrus ya able to help me out?
How would I find 2-6, 10, and 12-14 ( I don’t understand the work)
Like, how am I supposed to know which side to set the side equal to?
(For some of them)
Can any of ya'll help me on how to do this?
if another question has been posted, please use one of the channels under math help
@wind heart just across the two transversals. the other lines are parallel, so use the line-splitter theorem
Like
For 10
I’m kinda confused why it’s not
5/6 = 9/7.5
Like why are the 5 and six flopped
It’s weird
Be careful
Keep in mind that if you set the proportion up from bottom line to top line, you set that other proportion the same way; bottom to top
10 on the screenshot is correct
the other doesn’t matter, just as long as the corresponding parts are the same
So like
For 2-6
Each side is congruent right
Like
How does number 3 make any sense
2-6 is correct, yes
well, you can look at it from different ways by moving the proportion around
$\frac{CD}{FB}=\frac{GD}{GB}$ can be rearranged to become $\frac{CD}{GD}=\frac{FB}{GB}$ or any way that helps you see it
xItzDia:
That’s really weird
if you cross multiply, the products should all match the original
but look at it from across, not up and down
Notice that CD and GD line up and FB and GB line up
Look at everything from across?
yes
Kk
You set them up right
Just cross-multiply
and solve like you would for any other variable
Hmmmm
@wind heart
if u get confused about tf does parallel lines mean
Think back to slope
y = mx
Oh I see
If u have 2 slopes
m1
m2
Theyre parallel if theyre equal
That’s a different way of putting it
Jst make sure u consistent with how u comparing proportions
Or u gon goof and get wrong answer
Thanks
Question guys
This is a physics problem but uses trig
It’s a calculation for acceleration down a slope so a=(5/7)(g)(sin(theta))
So why the 5/7 part?
F = ma 
we cant say shit unless we see free body diagram
or know more about problem
Like forces in every dir
starting from rest or wat
Ah. I guess that’s why we were spoon fed that equation lol
We were doing an experiment on acceleration of a marble down a slope. It’s just the 2nd lab so far
I’m guessing the 5/7 has to do with friction and mass maybe? Like a friction coefficient?
The park has the shape of a quadrilateral. Three sides measure 50, 60, and 70. The angle between two sides of 50 and 60 is 127 degrees. The angle between 60 and 70 is 132 degrees. How can I find the fourth side's side and the size of the quadrilateral?
I found it nvm
Hey
Can someone see if I'm right?
$\frac{1}{\cos\alpha}$ is reciprocal of the cosine\
$\cos^{-1}$ OR $\arccos$ is inverse of the cosine
arccos and 1/cos are not the same thing
No
WTF
Oh no I see
How
Mathematical inverse and notational here are two different things
Cos to the negative 1 (1/cos) is actually the function secant
arccos and secant are not the same thing
The normal notation of cos^-1 is just a conventional quirk
Rokabe told me when we say cos-1 we never mean secant
Yes he's not wrong
But if you have: $\cos^n(x)$, that's the same thing as $(\cos(x))^n$
Abhijeet Vats:
but the second one isn't the correct notation right?
And 'reciprocal of the cosine'
Second one is totally valid
Second one is correct.
really, I got marked off for doing it
Anyways, people tend to use arccos
guess its just a teacher quirk
Cos it's less confusing
Cos
Tell your teacher to suck a dick
Hehe
PristineWolf:
Yes that works
Keep in mind that restrictions need to be made such that the inverse actually exists
Yep, 1/cos spits out a ratio
cos^-1 spits out an angle
And the 2nd is when we will use inverse of cosine to get the angle
Exactly
I think I got it
in precalc I had to graph arccos, sad times 😦
Keep in mind that the angle interpretation is limiting
These are just functions with specific definitions
Maybe I should stop talking
For this year teacher said only actute angles no 0° no 90°
Nah bandana lol, i'll let you take this one
So don't sweat on me
i think thats because you get to those in algebra 2
Ah, so you won't even be worrying about the domains of the inverse trig functions
i still get confused on that
@weary drift why did you overcomplicate it to me 1st year trig and I still have no clue what domains / images are. Will probs study 'em later the summer
Thank their periodicity for that one
Thanks rokabe tho <3
Don't worry, perspiring on you is the last thing I'd want to do 😄
Pff
Like intervals?
kinda
Nvm
He didn't overcomplicate anything. He just said the truth as it is.
But 9th grader brain
They're exactly like intervals
Too tiny
I had to graph arccos and I got marked off for "wrong work"
A function is defined on the interval x=whatever
Forget it. Understanding domains and codomains requires a bit of work with sets.
she literally taught us to use a midline but we get marked off for it
So forget about it for now. Once you reach the topic of functions, then worry about it.
Oh wait vats is this pre-precalc stuff?
?
Shoot sorry, okay I'll drop the functiony talk
oh, that's more algebra 2
