#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 222 of 1
im 13 freshmen year
overall curriculum can vary between schools birdie
Dec 31st
I would not feel worried about anything Bongo says
anyways lets go back to the topic of what is included in the subject of geometry, as a course
ok
I mean
it's alright
oh yea, send that syllabus
Areas and perimeters right
age never matters
Well want a basic run down
nothing happens in geo kek
That’s all I know
Hey Hegel
missed you 😉
Us
@trail minnow it's like. an intro do baby's first mathematical reasoning
me?
NY
Im in nyc
ye kinda
oh boy is that 8bit
nyc gang
I don’t live in nyc

I live sorta close to it tho
anyway geometry basically is just simple logical reasoning
Long Island
I was asking @upper karma
that's nyc
No
Nyc included Long Island
Only parts of it

Not my town

anyway im not sure but your class may open with a short unit on shit formal logic kek
if then statements, and/or, syllogisms, etc
I have some textbooks but they make everything seem so hard
Well
Like I still can’t do the algebra one and I’m supposedly good at it
the algebra textbook?
Send one
you can't do the problems?
Let's figure it out together
,rotate 90
haha
lmao
Is that a cat
yes doxx
^
pearson is standard
Ok
Got it?
"""logic and reasoning""" kek
anytime
Good
Does this server include physics
to skip it over the summer
nice
Yes
geometry is shit
you should delete that image, the non rotated one
Anything math
well actually
not really bongo
@olive solar both have been deleted
high school geo is shit
Where?
just ask it
Can’t find the chat
i still see it on my discord client
Right on, I bid you farewell
"just ask it" you make no sense
bye
Ye
i know
how do you get the helpers role
ask mod
physics 🤢
you bribe the mods
Help people
i paid woog 30$
@copper valve can I get helper
I'm willing to help other geometry students, as it's fresh in my mind
pinging woog 
also anything before algebra 2
I've pinged woog on her other servers
you dont need helper role to do that
I know
She's mod on a school server im in
but having a color is nice
hm. honestly i'm not sure how they should handle asking for helper role
maybe a channel for it so that mods don't all have to get pinged?
all of high school is meme
all of school is a meme
^ that's facts
just drop out now while you still can
lol
Hegel what do I need too know for Rome part of history
thanks hegel
nothing kek
I don't think i should drop out
oke
when I've been doing so well so far
its garbo
Ima try to finish world by Sunday
that's very motivated
more seriously you should know the founding of rome + the gracchi brothers
then comes micro and macro for a week
Also this has gone off topic
don't want the geometry chat clogged up
huh

chill mi g r a t i o n
Wait
no u
When does ap go back too?
Right, cheers
ask in chill smh
I've invited others in my summer course as well to join
lets go to chill
What did you do?
fookin stop talking here 
Can someone explain to me how u do dis
Which problem?
Triangle
Idk how u draw them
wait let me think about this one
I understand the concept
Just plotting
Ok
K is scale factor
No pls is there an algebraic way to this
Very nice online course knowledge you’ve got there
Thanks
Thank you owo
uwu
Anyone need help?
I need help
How do I differentiate f(g(h(x))) n times
oh
right
Anyone need help on geometry
What
@upper karma
everything about circles
There is this formula for the volume of nth ball
All you need too know
I don't have proofs memorized
I can do math though
send a problem
I'll be able to probably do it
Unless it's advanced geo
i can't do that stuff yet
oh volume of nth unit ball is fun
$x_1^2+x_2^2+\dots +x_{n-1}^2+x_n^2=1 \to x_1^2+x_2^2+\dots +x_{n-1}^2 = \sqrt{1-x_n^2}^2$
JohnDoeSmith:
a nth unit ball can be thought of the integral of many different (n-1) balls of radius sqrt(1-x_n^2)
Org-mode can do latex too
xD
which was pretty cool when I first looked at it
but in practice, markdown is much faster to write
whoops wrong channel
Also another interesting fact, the volume of an n balls with radius 1 actually vanishes when n approaches infinity
I think
Which is really weird to me
yeah that is wierd, the volume maxes out somewhere near n=7 i think, and it starts going down aftr that
yeah
What is the sum of all the even nth ball volume with radius 1
Think about it

It's interesting
its gonna be something like e^(pi) right
Whoever:
hmm
hm?
this is probably one of those "14yr old asking graduate level question," but how does one go proving a number is normal or not?
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NormalNumber.html
apperantly this is a thing, seems interesting tho
Do you mean rational, irrational, and transcendental?
irrational number that contains all combination of sequence of numbers sort of
hmm actually they havent proven Pi is that yet
for example, 0.010010001000100001... is not normal but irrational
yeah
have they proven it for sqrt(2) or smth?
I'm pretty sure the only known normal numbers are one's constructed to be normal
I don't think there's much you can do to prove a number is normal
yeah, it seems hard, like where to even begin(atleast for now that is). irrationality for example can be done with continued fractions etc
infinite series of a number with a term of 1/10^k
then you can do something about it
I heard some like almost all numbers are normal
almost all real numbers are normal
hmm can that be proven
it's been proven
oh nice. although a bit over my head as i havent studied enough analysis yet
so basically we know almost none of the reals
well we know almost none of the naturals
oh right lol, i think "know" is kinda vague
Godel's incomplete theorem be like 
lol incompleteness not incomplete
Oh so when I don’t do homework I get in trouble but when Godel does he gets famous 
Lol
Inequality 

So i am confused whether a locus is A point or it defines OTHER GEOMETRICAL Figures that are a collection of points and they satisfy some condition ?
Like in wikipedia it says
In geometry, a locus (plural: loci) (Latin word for "place", "location") is a set of all points (commonly, a line, a line segment, a curve or a surface), whose location satisfies or is determined by one or more specified conditions.
While in a book which i am reading i am required to prove the locus of a point equidistant from two fixed points is the perpendicular bisector of the line segment joining the 2 points
Any hints guys ?
Colorodos stains ?
your question is, if im reading correctly
you want to prove that if a 3rd point is equidistant from 2 others, then drawing a pine from that third point perpendicular to the line formed by the first 2 will give a perpendicular bisector,correct?
@olive solar i actually want to know what a locus actually , the proof is quite basic its the use of locus , which is confusing me.
@upper karma So the perpendicular bisector is the locus
The locus is the set of points that are equidistants from the two points (that are connected by a line) i.e. the perpendicular bisector...
#SmokeWeedErryday
hint
So, I don’t really know a way for sure to prove these triangles congruent
label CD y
so I’m a bit lost
yeah alright
not similar either
rip
but they do share one side, so we can label that side CD y
was just about to check for that
now try relating the three sides of each triangle
and yes, I did
hint: triangle inequality
👍
how do i know what period these trigs are? sometimes its 180 and 360, then its just 180
have you learned unit circle trigonometry?
i think im gonna go sleep tho
k
@upper karma you only got x>1 tho
yea
uhhhhhhh what are you trying to do?
Done with that
here'e one solution for you
I am donw with it
connect points l and k, and then you can probably figure it out from there
well wtf do you want
you're telling me to find angle B, but you say you're done with it
Did you want to check the answer?
yes i checked on alcumus they had different solution but same conclusion
he posted a problem, i thought he wanted help
cuz if he didn't want help, what else did he want?
I mean i was confused first i am done with it now
so what you're saying is, you never attempted it and then posted it, only to then attempt it then realize you can solve it
yEa i did some constructions then it was easy
I mean i didnt use the book pen first
tried to solve it in my small mind
butthe question asks for some construction
I think its B but im not sure
It would be nice if you had l - h without needing to use h
Let l - h = x, then naturally h = l - x
@umbral snow
Ok starting with 17, explain
Can you find any other length in this picture?
Can you find any other length in this picture?
I dont understand
Sorry
You just repeated that question
I mean I look at it
And I see only 2 lengths but nothign else
1 height
the weird 0 with line dividing it
Can you figure out how long any other line is in this picture?
Why can't you
That doesn't mean you can't find how long other lines are in this picture
Think about what you know about trig
I dont know much about trig
Just functions
sohcahtoa i mean but that wouldnt help here
why not?
I dont see no use to it as this is a cone and like theres no triangles
Think about it - there's a right angled triangle
Unless theres that weird one at top with the dotted line but how the heck would that help
Like its just the 0 with the line as an angle and one l as a side
and i cant put that in a calculator to get an amount
What does soacohtoa let you do
That's theta not zero btw
zero with a line= theta
o yeah
cool
sohcahtoa lets me
find missing sides and angles
You got yourself the way to do it (:
what the hecky does that mean
but how does that help me find an expression for h in terms of l and theta
😦
I think it's best to learn a bit of trig before doing these sorts of questions
It's not. We're not here to teach you a whole subject
Yea...
great help guys
It might help you to do 18 first, before you do 17 honestly
yes, hypotenuse
Ah thakn
and what side (relative to theta) are we looking for?
yep
Hello there
Namington:
yos
Am I needed?
not yet
and in this case, the adjacent is x, the hypotenuse is l
Ping me if I am
Namington:
can you solve for x now?
ahh
ie, get it by itself
yes
so multiply l on both sides
Namington:
but of course, this side "x" isnt actually what we're looking for
nope
we're looking for h
yesh
really?
not half
Oh
but x + h = l
1?
not quite
doarn
we have $x + h = l$
Namington:
$x = l - h
$x = l \cos \theta \ x = l - h$
Namington:
since those both equal x, we can just set them equal to each other, right?
$l \cos \theta = l - h$
Namington:
Namington:
can you solve for h?
$l \cos \theta - l = -h$
Namington:
divide?
by what?
-1
sure
oh
Namington:
and there's our equation
though i think it looks cleaner written as $h = l - l \cos \theta$
Namington:
then just write the $l - l \cos \theta$ part
Namington:
or yeah, that way
same thing
let's give a brief idea of what this "means"
l is the length of this side
yesh
l cos theta, we said, is the length of the adjacent side
the side x
so if we take the entire side
l
and subtract the x
we're left with just the h
which makes sense, looking at the diagram, right?
oui oui
and there's your expression for part 17
you can use it to do #18
(or you can go through the full process again, but thats not really necessary)
(we already did it once!)
(nooooopesies, you always make me understand concepts and you've been there most of the time actually maybe even all teh times i asked for help, your great dudee, thanks Helper Namington)
Hey I'm assuming you guys are done
Would you mind helping me a bit?
I'm not sure how to approach this question
I'm setting BC as chord and touches PQ at Z
And trying to prove BZC pi/2
But I'm not sure that's the correct line of reasoning
Please help
@queen python I think you're needed atm
Would you mind helping with this question?
I'm not sure what condition I need for the circle to touch at PQ
They're the same Q
Part a it's telling you to draw a diagram
But I fucked that up
Part b is a proof for the situation listed out in the top of a
We know that the center of both circles is B
That means the circles go around it
Wait
No
Nvm
Give me a minute to find the answer
Ok
Are you sure you are wrong?
It seems right too me
If you are ping the helpers
This might be above me
dont ping before 15 minutes please
ill look over it but it's been so many years since ive done any geometry
I still haven’t even taken geo
This looks a bit more advanced than the geo I’ve been doing
I leave it too you
your diagram is just about fine
for @
*a
your diagaram for b is incorrect though
it's asking for a circle with bc as diameter
meaning that the midpoint of bc is the center
also, since R and r are different lengths, the center of said circle wouldn't be point A
since A cannot be assumed to be the midpoint
In that second diagram I tried a different approach
I tried to make it touch
Have the centre to be O
A as point of common tangencency
And prove BZC is 90
Or O as midpoint BC
Yeah I think that ones a lost cause and too confusing over two pages
I have one with a similar concept would you mind helping with that?
can someone help me with this
2sinxcosx = cos2x 0<x<2pi
but the underscore thing under the <
which means 0 can equal x and x can equal 2pi
do you know any identities for sin 2x
ye uh the 2sinxcosx
yep
nice
wait no im still stuck go on if u can help me
do you know any expressions for tan 2x
like what's the simplest one you can think of
2tanx/1-tan^2x
yeah
np
@heady juniper hi
well i was gonna give a solution but i have to go soon
@heady juniper as a hint, you should be able to prove something is cyclic, concurrent, and then use power of a point
i need to know how to find the perimeter of an oblique triangle that has only 2 sides given and no angles
That's impossible
i know right but theres a problem of it then they just guess what the other side is and solved the perimeter lmao
Take a picture of it
Or show us the whole problem
@upper karma
You might just be missing something
@fringe dirge
Yep you are missing something
The first thing you should notice is that they're not exactly finding the perimeter
They're just choosing which one it could be from the options
The first you should ask yourself is if you understand why c<35
@upper karma
@fringe dirge ohhh it make sense!!! But why is c<35 is it theory?
Rule ormsomething
I must have missed some rules
It's called the triangle inequality
You understand that the bigger the angle C is, the larger side c will get right?
@upper karma
Yes but how can u know that c must be lesser than 35
Well think about what happens when the angle C gets really really big
Like closer and closer to 180 degrees
Both b and d gets smaller
Yes angles
But think about what the triangle looks like when the angle C is close to 180 degrees
Almost flat
Alright ahhaah thanks now i understand its the only problem that bothers me
Are u a math major?
Yeah no problem
can someone check if my answer is correct?
Just ask
ask you?
Ask here
snipping tool
alright thx
I can’t arrive at this answer
I'm so confused can someone explain? The answer is, X = 1/3
Well on the problem before I was able to set tan(-1) = 2x-5, and solve for x, but on this one having the x nested in two different places is just throwing me off and idk where to start
well generally in these kind of problems, it helps to draw out a diagram
draw a right triangle with an angle such that its sine is sqrt(2x) and its cosine is sqrt(x)
you could use sin(arccos(...))
When drawing the triangle, how would I write 2x? I'm used to the fractions where you know where to put the opp/hyp values but am a little thrown off by the single term
well let hyp be 1, then the rest of the triangle will follow
(notice this doesnt end up mattering as what matters is the angle not the side lenghts, i.e we could scale the triangle up or down and get the same result)
Thank you so much! Bells are going off in my head now
no problem
I need help with algebra 1/2 assignment, PM me if you can help.


@mental wharf Is it Sigma from overwatch or no?
no
i can totally see the resemblance b/w sigma overwatch hero and sigma's pfp

Bruh its so similar how could u miss it
can someone help me
Hi everyone, I had a question: So, say we have a triangle and we draw out its angle bisectors. Then we connect the points where the angle bisectors meet the opposite sides (the endpoints of the angle bisectors). Connect those endpoints and you get the "incentral" triangle. My question is, are the sides of this incentral triangle perpendicular to the angle bisectors of the original triangle? In this link: http://www.ddekov.eu/e2/htm/01_definitions/02_triangles/02_01_Incentral_Triangle.htm
Is LcC perpendicular to LaLb?
Thanks so much 😃
no pair is perpendicular in a scalene triangle
So the incentral triangle is not always equilateral, right?
Just because I was playing around with the idea, and it seems like the incentral triangle must be equilateral if the angle bisectors are perpendicular to its sides
Ah thanks, I think I understand now actually
@fringe dirge I'd assume since sine is O/H, cosine is A/H, and tangent is O/A
If m∠ABC = 70°, what is m∠ABD? Justify your reasoning.
A) Using the addition property of equality, 40 + 70 = 110, so m∠ABD = 110°.
B) Using the subtraction property of equality, 70 − 30 = 40, so m∠ABD = 30°.
C) Using the Angle Addition Postulate, 40 + m∠ABD = 70. So, m∠ABD = 30° using the subtraction property of equality.
D) Using the Angle Addition Postulate, 40 + 70 = m∠ABD. So, m∠ABD = 110° using the addition property of equality.
Its either B or C but im a little confused on the wording
Its C, nvm
jesus christ what is it with this formality on such a simple problem
Why not just say angle ABD and angle BDC are adjacent angles because they share a common arm and their uncommon arm lies on the opposite side of common arm and say both angles add to 70 then use those shitty postulate . @rigid wharf
Boi you overthinking on such a basic problem
Hmm
@worthy root it’s cause the wording is there to throw you off, I know math but I always do bad on a test if it is worded like that shit above
It's not that badly worded tho
I don’t understand why it is 6cube/9cube
it's asking you to find the ratio in height from the smaller cube to the bigger cube
why is it h^3
because you are finding the ratio of a 3D object
but honestly i might be wrong because it is a 1D measurement
ratio of V of similar object = ratio of dimension cubed
@worthy root Whats easy for you is hard for others, I struggle in math but im great in history, science and decent in english
I joined the server to improve my math skills, it is my weakest point and I want to change that
what's your math level? @rigid wharf
what math are you taking
geometry
are you taking that in the fall?
Right now
Yea
damn thats tough
Its much harder online cause the tools are stoopid
geometry almost gave me ptsd
But hey ill be ahead for high school
algebra 2 was pretty easy for me
I hope I get it for freshman year
Review stuff?
yea
Ah
the new material isnt hard at all
and the precalculus for me was a joke
i took it at a college though
Algebra is really eh
Its can be hard if you dont get it right away
But I tend to get it right away
it was literally the 2nd half of algebra 2 and the professor crammed in trigonometry at the last minute but he was a nice guy and barely gave us any trig
and he gave us free pizza during the quizzes
i love history
do you watch oversimplified
Sometimes
i'm one of his server nitro boosters
Ah
back on topic
Lol
when you take calculus, you better be on this server every single day
calculus 1 was challenging for me
Looks hard
i hear rumors that calculus 2 is even worse
thats calculus 2
Idk what im looking at right there
Oh
Actually I think I get it a little
Wait nope
you're looking at finding the area of the funky shapes formed by 2 lines
Ah
the funky S is an integral sign
That makes a bit of sense
think of the S as a representation on a graph as vertical lines that are so close to each other that it fills up all of the space
okkkk
now what are you working on in geometry?
Just started proofs
did you prove the crap out of triangles yet?
Kinda
Well
I just started proofs, theres suppose to be a class discussion but its not for awhile and I finished everything up to it
what textbook
Its not a textbook its like online notes
Hang on lemme get it
It might be a textbook and im just stupid but oh well
oop hang on I got mail
Hello home
So I’m asking about number 8
I have no idea what kind of transformation “H” would ask me to do
the book has to have introduced the notation somewhere @upper karma
Turns out we just happened to know it was a half turn
so that’s cool
thanks for the help
I need an example of a quadrilateral that has one pair of opposite sides congruent, one pair of opposite angles congruent, and is NOT a parallelogram.
and is a simple quadrilateral


Well apparently it's not.
It's my prof and a homework question that I can't wrap my head around

thats because the question is wrong
in euclidean geometry that is by definition a parallelogram
like
having those properties is sufficient to prove a quadrilateral a parallelogram
wait
hmm

ohhh
i see
???
👀
@tidal rune do you have to prove that the shape is not a parallelogram, or demonstrate that a shape exists which is not necessarily a parallelogram
I need to show an example of a quad with those properties to prove that those properties are not sufficient to show that the quad is a parallelogram
I think just proving its existence isn't enough. Need an example
Isn't a counterexample a good enough proof? I'm essentially disproving a universal statement alike "For all X, if X is a quadrilateral that has a pair of opposite sides congruent and a pair of opposite angles congruent, then X is a parallelogram."
hmmmst
a counterexample is a good enough disproof, yes
i think for this it'd be best to construct a counterexample with a compass
you just need to show that it's a counterexample
Can I be of help?
i mean, it's sometimes easy!
consider the statement "all prime numbers are greater than 4", then 3 is fairly easy to verify as a counterexample!
I'm so hecking done I just need a break
Yea I'm pretty sure I need to draw the example to scale with the right lengths and angles for this.
...by trying to help others with geometry
@tidal rune construct it with a compass and straightedge
Compass?
I could just as well say I have constructed a quadrilateral in which the interior angles don't add up to 2pi
Or protractor
Why that tho? I'm not drawing circles
um
you can use a compass to construct any shape

well any shape that can feasibly be drawn anyway
its very easy to create congruent lines and angles with a compass
I'm not smart enough for that
🙄
In this video I demonstrate how to construct congruent segments using a compass and straight-edge.


I try to draw the counterexample and I keep drawing a parallelogram instead
what are you trying to get a counterexample for again
A simple quadrilateral with a pair of opposite sides congruent, a pair of opposite angles congruent, and is not a parallelogram.
how do I solve a special right triangle when there is only 1 side and its on the hypotenuse part of the triangle with all three angles already showing
|
|
| 60° \14
|
|■____\30°
use microsoft paint seriously
im on phone
is this what you mean
yeah
so what's giving you trouble here
the other length of the other sides
i'm not asking you what you're trying to find
i'm asking you what's giving you trouble when it comes to doing that
I forgot what formula it is sin cos or tan
sin, cos and tan aren't "formulas"
they're trig functions. or trig ratios.
anyway
which function to use depends on three things:
- what angle you're using
- what side you know
- what side you're trying to find
as long as you always choose the trig function correctly, different choices for angle and known side will always yield the same value for the unknown side
but like
ok
let's say you want to find the vertical leg of that triangle, as depicted in my photo
you'll need both anyway but we gotta start somewhere
ok?
@vale bobcat
im new to this triangle with only 1 side showing
i'm asking you if you're following and want me to walk you through this y/n

