#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 221 of 1
This looks kinda arbitrary
Like is there some sort of set of rules?
Like the lines and corners you high lighted just now, why those and why not other ones
they cross the hypotnese
we start out with 4 poitns
2 points for each line
which we have the coordinates for
Why not the line I just highlighted in red
that line was just the other side of the rectangle
Hmmm ok
we use those points because they are horizantal and vertical to the hypoteneus
i wrote a program that does it and it works
I'm not sure how to extend this to planes though
Oh neat
That would have been probably better to show but I have no programming experience
It's a cool idea tho
if both slope are positive it is slighty different but same concept
yeah it totatly works im quite happy as i figured it out on my own
if i can extend it to line plane intersesction i can write my own raytracer
thanks anyways
what is giving you trouble here?
I found the x and y intercepts
so your points are (-2, 0), (3,0) and (0,18)
those are the three vertices of your triangle
Oh
if you draw it, it'll be obvious how to find its area
do 2 triangles with equal sides have the same angles?
do 2 triangels which each have 3 sides that are equal have the same angles?
another way to ask the question is, how many unique trianlges that have the same length of sides can you build
oh wait are you asking or trying to explain
im asking
first one: no;
second one: yes
its the same quession
wait. shit. i misread the first one lol
if two triangles all have sides of the same length between them, then they are considered equivalent
they have equal angles, yes
ok thanks
they are equivalent triangles
then how come i cant extract an angle from a point using 3 coordinates of 3 points
using coordinates of 3 points
You can’t, but I can 
ok ill try on my own
hey orange popsicle you can derive it on your own you know
just draw a triangle and a perpendicular to one of the bases and work it out
you can with right triangles but not just rrandom triangle
You can do it with any triangle
If I scale down a figure 5 times less in size what is the scale factor
1/5
wdym
"5 times less in size"
if its the length 5 times less
the scale factor is 1/5
if its the area
then the scale factor of length is 1/25
okay thanks
@echo trench
@queen python Yes hello
other two angles not confirmed to be 60
unless im missing something
yea no they arent
Let me explain
go for it Bongo, I believe in you
I know I was just conflicting with it as I thought it created a whole new triangle which had to equal 180 degrees.
Yeah
pentagons add to 540
Ik
What do all the sides of a polygon have to add up too
360 degrees
im aware
fine
I'll be smart about it
In the shape below your 60-60-60 triangle
All the sides must add up to 360
You see how there are the squares that mean 90 degrees
We can see that we already have 60 degrees
so the other side must be 30
Ohhhhh, ok ok.
wait but the triangle isnt 60-60-60
He wrote 60-60-60
@fossil ledge It is not?
no
Oh waiiit
So I assume he was right
lets look at the angle with theta
Is it because the 60 degree is with the bigger triangle
the other side is 90 degrees and we subtract at 16
74
So we now that that side
so now 180-60-74 will give you the other angle of your top triangle
that angle + phi (what you are solving for) should add up to 90
No, I really don't understand
Yes
we know that theta is 16
do you mind re sending the photo
we can see that the angle above theta + theta =90
Because if the square
So we have 16+x=90
We subtract 16 from both sides
And get x=74
Question
?
Where did you get the other theta, to make the equation theta + theta= 90
angle above theta*
^
The 90 degrees>
angle above theta + theta =90
the aren't greater than
They are 90
because we see the square that means they make a right angle
Oh sorry, the greater than was a typo
Oh
ok now we know we have 60 +74
What is that?
134
so now we do 180-134
Do you know why?
yes
Which is 74 degrees to the other side of the 16 right?
Yes
And we subtracted it bc?
we know that the side opposite of theta + 16=90
Ahhhhhh
And then from there
Subtract 16 from both side
cool cool
why did we add 60?
Now we use that 74 and add it with the 60
To find the missing side, which is opposite of phi
74+60=134
Yes
x+134=180
yes
-134 on both sides
good
and with the knowledge that i learned with theta and the 90 degrees
*same concept
I basically would work backwards, so
in this case it is 90 degrees
in other cases it can be diffrent degrees
Thank you so much actually Bongo
good job both of you 
You too Goat
teaching is a great tool to make sure you understand the material
o
pretty much why im here, just to practice my foundations
:-), thats so great
well hopefully we se you around here
And you can help someone some day
do you have any other questions?
Nope but if you need help, I'll try my best. I'm more with english, and history so ask me there lol
O
If it's us history I can help
or world or euro
English depends
if you want help analyzing anything I can help
@queen python Are you in the AP discord server?
Wait do you take AP bongo?
I am gonna
what Aps are you taking?
Physics and World
ah
im taking world, euro, chem, and comp sci this year as a soph 
well i took ap world class as a freshman but it's a 2 year class
Where do you guys school at?
Nyc
Earth Quake state 😃
California is kinda harsh on AP and its kinda sad
i wont exspose u

expose
i've been considering adding macro on to the list
Like specific AP courses are only for one grade and its pretty sad
we can take any ap
cause i was prepping for euro this summer and immediately got a 90% and realized that i actually did not need to do as much prep as i thought i would
so i have more room now
ye
As long as we but the test
yes
buy
we can take any AP test here
we don't need the class
and any class if you ask and they decide you deserve it
probably
Sure
For example 5.6 to 5.2 is a change of 7.14%
What would be the scale factor if everything was reduced by 7.14%
,calc 5.2/5.6
Result:
0.92857142857143
that
so aprox 0.93:1 ratio?
of image:original, yes
isnt the first one the original
usually for ratios
so am i wrong
@spark stag
wait
if we have the original and then we have a new one which is 2 times smaller what would the ratio be
It will be 2:1 right?
Or 1:0.5?
those are equivalent
okay
But ratios are original:new?
if we have the original and then we have a new one which is 2 times smaller what would the ratio be
But this will be 2:1 right
Okay thanks
So it usually goes from original to new
Isn’t this wrong
If it goes from original to new shouldn’t the fraction be b/a
when we talk about scale factors
we use image/original
or image:original
or whatever
thats how a scale factor is calculated
since the scale factor is the value such that:
$\text{original} \cdot \text{scale factor} = \text{image}$ \ and therefore \ $\text{scale factor} = \frac{\text{image}}{\text{original}}$
Namington:
but you can make a ratio be whatever you want
so if I had an image and it reduced by size in 7% the radio will be 1:0.93
not quite
I don’t understand
when we're talking about a ratio
its always a ratio of something to something else
so you have to clarify what you're talking about
just saying "the ratio" is meaningless
"the ratio of original to image", however, is 1:0.93 as you said
yes
So if I had an old image and it was reduced by 7% in total size into a new image it will be 1:0.93?
@spark stag
the ratio of old to new is 1:0.93, yes
the scale factor of "size" is 0.93, as that's what you would multiply the "size" of the original by to get the image
for example, if the "size" of the old is 15 cm, then we'd multiply that by 0.93 to get the "size" of the new
(note that i'm assuming we're talking about a spot where units line up, here; if units are different, ie. scale factor is referring to length while "size" refers to area, then you need to convert appropriately)
so if I were to say I scaled down a figure by a ratio of 5:1 it would mean I’m making a new figure 5 times less in area?
that's how i'd interpret that, yes
well
if you said you scaled down a figure's area
"size" is ambiguous
Okay
does it mean area or length?
Like the whole figure
...
Including length and area
ok so
if we have a 5 * 5 square
if we scale down the length according to a 5:1 ratio
we get a 1*1 square
whereas if we scale down the area
we get a 2.236 * 2.236 square (since the area of 25 goes to 5, and the square root of 5 is about 2.236)
there's a difference
usually, when we say "scale factor"
we're referring to length
unless we say otherwise
Doesn’t length affect area though?
yes
Okay
If I were to say there was a figure and I were to make a new one from within in from the center and scale it down by a ratio of 1:0.93 the new figure will be 7% less in length?
@spark stag am I Right or wrong?
"scale it down by a ratio of 1:0.93"
what are you scaling down
the length? the area?
How angle between two parallel vectors be 0 .
i mean they are parallel they wont even intersect ! then how the heck can one say the angle between them is 0.
The cross product of the two vectors are 0
Well think of it like this, you have two lines intersecting at 90 degrees, what would happen to those lines if you would shift that angle to 0
learn it in *
Or 180 degrees
u can say that the angle bw them is undefined
it can be 0 or 180 or multiples of 180
but in all cases sin180=0
sin0=0
sin(n*pi)=0
n={0,infinity}

sin(1)80=0
now that is just false
So the question is you have a 8 by 10 photo enlarged to an 18 by 22.5 inch phot what’s the scale factor
I said 10:22.5 but the sender is 9:4, how??
take the larger side and divide by the smaller side
doesn't that give you the scale factor?
What larger side
Oh I’m dumb the awnser is 9 fourths I thought it was a ratio of 9 to4
I can make sense of angle between vectors with parallel shift of vector
Anyone need help?
@queen python yes check #precalculus
oy I'm studying for the SAT math test, can you guys explain this problem to me?
try grabbing a piece of paper and plotting 3,4 and 5,7 on it
alright
when I look at this problem, I feel like 2 points can be on the border of an infinite amount of different circles
do you know the equation of an ellipse?
I'm a bit rusty, sorry
it's $(\frac{x - x_c}{a})^2 - + (\frac{y - y_c}{b})^2 = 1$
hegel:
where a and b* are the foci of the ellipse
ah you have a latex bot, beautiful
yes uwu
so in this case a = b = r because a circle is a ellipse with 1 foci
so we can say $(\frac{x - x_c}{r})^2 - + (\frac{y - y_c}{r})^2 = 1$
hegel:
we can use this to determine the equation of the circle, no?
as we have two points
o wait im super rusty, this might not be correct 
wouldnt you have multiple circle equations that are satisfied by those points?
you need 3 points
^ I agree with sigma
it does work
any 3 points that arent in a line form a unique circle
ye
this might be a super shitty question
so, find a point that makes a line with the 2 points you have
I got it from an unofficial test
clandestine testing
what the fok
maybe it's from a 1995 sat who knows
oh wait
question: does "lies on" mean contained in the circle or on the border of the circle?
border
Well you can't have a point on the line between the two points
border
ah shite
yeah
there it is
i was gonna say find the line between the two points
Without blowing up radius to infinite
I thought about sigma's solution but I misunderstood what lies on meant
@dawn bobcat try calculating the line between P_1 and P_2 (our given points) and seeing if any of those points lie on them
so what then, you find the equation of the line between those two points and then plug in all answers until one is on the line?
ye
I got line y = 1.5x - 0.5
See if the pairs lie on the line
E is the answer btw
Looks right to me
ye it is
ye E is on the line
you can just plot it and see
👍
I just joined this server btw, is it better to ask questions in math help or pre-university channels?
we don't care tbh
couldnt you still have a point that's not on the line but that's on the circle?
I'ma migrate to the math help channels for my next like 12 questions
All points that could lie on a circle are off that line
ah yeah right
Can anybody help me wit this geometry question
By this definition of cone how do I solve this?
@whole swift i think this is calc
draw it first
and see what you have so far
there is a very specific formula for finding the angle between two lines in cartesian plane, kinda forgot it
but see if there is something obvious, like maybe they're perpendicular or something
what formula did you use?
There's a specific formula relating to tan(theta) = something something
i forgot
ah fuck it lemme check using vectors
1.12 degrees sounds like way too little
$\cos(\theta) = \frac{8}{\sqrt{65}}$
MemesPlease:
is what i got
I did. Tan theta = (8-7)/(1+8*7)
,calc atan(1/8) * 180/pi
Result:
7.1250163489018
,w arccos(8/(65)^(1/2))
,calc 0.12345499 * 180/pi
Result:
7.0734498868298
close
wasnt sure how to type it, just wanted to make sure LOL
I used ad ifferent method this time.
51.6 degrees work?
What I did this time was just measure the distance between each point and apply Pythagorean to get the value for each line. Then I used the inverse of cos to get the degree. Too complicated?
someone teach me how to maths
Then cry

and libgen books
for solving sinusodidal model word problems:
why is it for sin, you do sin(theta)=sin(pi-theta) and then for cos, you do cos(theta)=cos(2pi-theta) to find the 2nd solution
like why do you different things depending on if its sin or cos.
p.s: just trying to understand the meaning behind this
because sin and cos are different functions and have different symmetries
Hey @upper karma, it all has to do with the unit circle. Remember that cosine and sine can be represented as the x and y values respectively as you travel along a unit circle's circumference with radius 1.
check out this graphic:
So, since sine is the y-value for a given angle along the unit circle, think about what angles produce the same exact height, or y-value, as each other
Say we have an angle x degrees along the unit circle. The terminal point of the angle has coordinates (cos x, sin x). So what if we started at the 180 degree mark, and traveled clockwise (negative angle) by x degrees? It's just a reflection of our original angle x across the y-axis. Therefore, the heights are the same. Another word for "start at 180 degrees and move backwards by the original angle) is (pi - theta), since pi radians = 180 degrees and (-theta) means move backwards/clockwise by theta
here's a better photo:
You can think about the same think for the cosine function. For the cosine, to get an equal x-value, you can go around 360 degrees (+2pi radians) and then subtract your angle (-theta), so you are basically just reflecting your original angle across the x-axis. This results in the terminal point of your new angle having the same cosine, or x-coordinate, as the terminal point of your original angle. Hope this helps 😃
thanks for the help 😁
No prob 😃
creeper aww masn
Anyone here ? I really need some urgent help.
@upper karma
what do you need
Hello there
Just a sec
Should nt sin square (A/2) be 2 sin square (A/2) ?
I think its a typo or something ?
Because the 2 reappears in the deriviation
yeah it should say 2sin^2(A/2)
thats from the 2(s - b) and 2(s - c)?
Oh yes !
are u asking about the so to therefor line
then its correct, 2 on the left and 4/2 on the right
Asking about the first one
ah okay
Thanks guys
I was assuming that i was seeing things because of being sleepy
And yes i have 1 more question
yes?
Why should Sin(a/2) be always positive ?
Oh i got it we are dealing with triangles
So a/2 should be less than 90 deg ? Right ?
Yes but i dont we have negative angles in triangles ?
and you should know that sin(x) for x < pi is positive
Oh sorry, I didn't realize we were just talking about triangles
it does, but think about it
you can always choose coordinate axes such that the angle lies between 0 and pi
you can always choose a coordinate axis such that the angle lies between 0 and pi , .jun can you elaborate this more .0?
like
put y = 0 on one arm
and sweep the angle from there
it will always be in the first and/or second quadrant
cant be more than that, since all angles in a triangle are less than pi
Oh yes !
Yes
Thanks a lot @chrome fiber for providing immediate help, wonder what time it is for you but for me its good night !
np
Hello @upper karma , look at angle BAC and x. When added together, they form a line, right? We call these supplementary angles, which means that the two angles add up to 180 degrees. So angle BAC + angle PAB = 180 degrees. Now, remember that the sum of the angles inside a triangle is also 180 degrees. See if you can use these facts to find out more about the relation between angle PAB and angle ACB, using supplementary angles and the fact that the interior angles of a triangle sum to 180.Let me know if that helps, or if you want me to go into more detail.
how come i could figure out the angle for A using the SSA formula, but then get the wrong answer for C, which I also used the SSA formula
(5.69sin27.9)/2.7195 = 7225
idk what the Mx + N means
See what happens when you subtract 90 from both sides
x = 90 + ACB, so ACB = x - 90
the question is asking for Mx + N
calm down euler
I'm sorry if I haven't been clear, we can take it to dms if you want
Since we can represent the measure of ACB as x - 90, and we are given that the measure of ACB can be represented by some equation Mx + N, where m is set to 1 and N is some other number, that other number must be -90, since the measure of ACB is proven to be x -90. So M + N = 1 + (-90) = -89. Hope that helps
ok thx i got a little confused because i learned about probability in my geomtry class
damn that math teacher
lol
Hey @lusty quest , it's possible to get the wrong answer for C if you are using the Law of Sines to figure out C. For example, say you used the law of sines to find that Side B = 2.7915 meters. You could now set up the proportion Sine 27.9 / 2.7915 = Sine C / 5.69. Cross-multiplication gets you to Sine C = 0.954. To find out what the measure of C is, you probably used the inverse sine function on your calculator, and it gave you C = 72.5 degrees. However, the inverse sine function is only defined for values from -90 degrees to +90 degrees, so no matter what it will always return an acute angle. In cases like these, you just have to remember that there are acute and obtuse angles with the same sine value, and it's up to you to find out which one to use based on the side lengths and the fact that the angles in a triangle must add up to 180. It's all in the rule sin (180 - x) = sin (x). In addition, the angle that creates the biggest side in a triangle must also be the biggest angle. Since c is the biggest side, C must also be the biggest angle. If C = 72.5 and B = 27.9, then A would have to be 79.6, and A would be the biggest angle. But a is not the biggest side, so A can't be the biggest angle. That means that instead of using the acute C given to you by the inverse sine function, you have to use the obtuse C with the same sine as the acute angle given you by the inverse sine function. So that would be 180 - 72.5, or 107.5 degrees for C. And 107.5 + 27.9 + 44.6 = 180, so it all checks out. C is the biggest angle and c is the biggest side, A is the second biggest angle and a is the second biggest side, and B is the smallest angle and b is the smallest side, so that checks out as well. Hope this helps 😃
holy crap, thanks for the answer
You're welcome 😃
Any help with this?
(Also by help I mean, learn how to solve it too)
I strive for the intelligence 
so uh can you figure out the angle thats between D and the right angle?
No
(i initially meant the one without a label)
right, and you can see how this applies to your diagram
since the dotted line is at 90 degrees from the slanted one
next, do you know how many degrees are in a triangle?
the holy 180
if we look at this triangle
we know two of its angles:
angle theta (37 degrees)
and the right angle (90 degrees)
we can use this to find the missing angle
ah
thank
so that means
that last angle is 53
and then if I remember, the 53 and its opposite need to equal 90
which is 37
what is "its opposite"?
Angle D
ah, yes
Now question
this might help
yeah, essentially
since it still adds up to 90 degrees
and the angle between the lines is preserved
(the lines dont bend or curve or anything)
aside: if you take high school physics, this exact diagram comes up when modelling the forces on an object on an inclined plane
and the fact that angle theta = angle D (as labelled here) is important
Oh wow, dude that is exactly why im doing this
AP Physics 1 time
Oh wtf
theta is equal to angle d and a
oh wow
yep, and that holds no matter what theta is
cool
(as long as its less than 90 degrees)
Hey namington how solid are u with with the trig unit circle
namington is a grad student in math 
i would be somewhat worried if he couldn't handle the unit circle
in fairness, i havent used the unit circle in, like, a decade (outside of tutoring)
but yes, I am familiar with it.
I dont get it and what the hecky its asking
essentially, the unit circle is used to visually find trigonometric values of a certain angle
the key insight is that
the sine of an angle represents its "y" value
and the cosine represents its "x" value
moreover, the radius of the circle is 1
thats why we call it the "unit" circle - "unit" meaning 1 (think "uno")
or uni
sure
m
let's start with the 0 degrees, for example
ok
whats the x value of that point?
not quite
darn
remember that the radius is 1
so 1?
mm
now, the x value represents the cosine of that angle
I'll give you a quick justification of why that's true in a minute
whats the y value of this point of 0 degrees?
(i'm saying "the point at 0 degrees", but i really mean the point where that arm intersects the circle - you get the idea, though)
am lost
whats the y value of the pink point here?
1
"y" means vertical, right?
up and down
so the y value of the pink point should be 0
o
so the pink point, 0 degrees, has an x value of 1, and a y value of 0
ie, its the point (1,0)
So (1,0)
and thats cos
whats the coordinate of the point at 90 degrees?
right
so we have two points
0 degrees is (1,0)
90 degrees is (0,1)
now, the cosine of an angle is its x value
and the sine is its y value
so whats the cosine of 0 degrees?
1
right, and its sine?
thats correct
i just filled out for cos for 0 degrees
the cosine of 0 degrees is 1
and the sine of 0 degrees is 0
in other words, if we have an angle theta, its ordered pair (x, y) represents (cosine(theta), sine(theta))
fill out the values of cosine/sine of 90 degrees in the same way that you did 0
(0,1)
right
for these, its probably best to draw them as a right triangle
I'm gonna start iwth 30 degrees
wtf
something like this
(ignore the top-left bit, screenshotting is hard)
or, drawn on your diagram
let me fill in the angles we know
where do i go from here?
and we know our last angle will be 60 degrees, but that doesnt really matter
now, we need to make an insight here
remember that the radius of the circle is 1
now notice that the diagonal slant of the triangle connects from the center to the edge of the circle
a line from the center to the edge... is a radius
so that diagonal line is 1
this should make it clear why cosine corresponds to x and sine corresponds to y, by the way
the x side is the adjacent (cosine is adjacent/hypotenuse, which will be x/1 = x)
and the y side is opposite (sine = opposite/hypotenuse = y/1 = y)
now, we just need to find the values for x and y
and those'll give us our sine/cosine
do you know how to construct a 30-60-90 degree triangle?
oh yeah
we take a 60-60-60 triangle, where all the sides are 1
ok
and cut it in half
this cuts one of the 60 degree angles into 30 degrees, and makes a 90 degree angle
and it also cuts one of the sides into 1/2
ok
and with pythagoreans theorem, we can find the third side
quick derivation:
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
b^2 = c^2 - a^2
b^2 = (1)^2 - (1/2)^2
b^2 = 1 - 1/4
b ^2 = 3/4
b = sqrt(3)/2
oops, i typod in my image; thats supposed to be sqrt(3)/2
not sqrt(2)/2
regardless
we can apply this to the triangle we drew on our unit circle
"rotate" it so the 30 degrees lines up, and we can see:
x = sqrt(3)/2
y = 1/2
so now we know
the point of 30 degrees
is $\left(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} , \frac12\right)$
Namington:
and again, the cosine is the x value, and the sine is the y value
so you should be able to fill out those values for 30 degrees now
this might seem like a lot of work - and it is. that's why we have the unit circle as a memorization tool
rather than having to go through the triangle proof each time
that said, now that we've done 30 degrees, we can do 60 degrees really quickly
easier way 😄
since the same triangle applies
oh
so its coordinate is (1/2, sqrt(3)/2)
you'll note that its the same as 30 degrees, just "flipped around"
the gist is this:
we construct a 30-60-90 degree triangle
and can see that it looks like this
by putting this triangle into the unit circle so that it matches up with our angles
we can find that angle's x and y value
[nitpick: the x and y value where that angle's arc intersects the unit circle]
if we flip and rotate this triangle to fit it into 30 degrees
it fits in like this
oh, by the way, i meant sqrt(3)/2, not sqrt(2)/2
typod in the yellow image
anyway
from this drawing, we can see that side x = sqrt(3)/2
and side y = 1/2
so the coordinate that corresponds to 30 degrees
is $\left(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} , \frac12\right)$
Namington:
we can also fit in the 30-60-90 triangle into our 60 degree angle, with another rotation. doing that gets us this
note that the x side is 1/2 now
and the y side is sqrt(3)/2
this is "backwards" from 30 degrees
like how 0 and 90 were "backwards" from each other
so the coordinate that corresponds to $60^{\circ}$ is $\left(\frac12, \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\right)$
Namington:
Ok where did 1/2 and square roo 3/2 come from
the construction of the 30-60-90 degree triangle
lets say we started with an equilateral triangle. in an equilateral triangle, all sides and angles are the same. this means the angles must be 60 (since 60 * 3 = 180). let's let the sides be 1.
now lets say we cut it in half, like this. Cutting a 60 degree angle in half gives us a 30 degree angle, and cutting a side of length 1 in half gives us a side of length 1/2
the reason we do this cut is to get a 30-60-90 triangle
now the last step is to find the missing side, the dotted line
and we do this via pythagorean theorem
if we call that side "b"
then 1/2 is "a" and 1 is "c"
so $a^2 + b^2 = c^2 \ b^2 = c^2 - a^2 \ b^2 = (1)^2 - (1/2)^2 \ b^2 = 1 - \frac14 \ b^2 = \frac34 \ b = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{\sqrt{4}} = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$
Namington:
hence, the third side is sqrt(3)/2
so our 30-60-90 unit triangle looks like this.
we can actually use this to find the sine, cosine, and tangent of 30 degrees and 60 degrees
or we can use it to make the unit circle, as i showed above
which helps us memorize these values
instead of using the triangle itself to derive them
@spark stag Sorry for late response, power went out but hmmmm
pOwEr wEnT oUt
if i have the hypot of a triangle, is there a way to get the other 2 sides ?
yes...but pretend those are not there.. lol
well, if you know the two sides are equal
then you can use pythagorean theorem
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
a = b, so
2a^2 = c^2
solve for a
c/sqrt(2) = a
trying this with the diagram, we get
,calc 70.71/sqrt(2)
Result:
49.999520497701
which checks out
"the two sides are equal" is part of that "other information" I was talking about earlier, btw
nice!
i'm trying to think if I will always have 2 equal sides of a triangle
yea.. I will... Thank you very much!!
A segment is created from points A and B. To copy segment AB, which of the following needs to be identified for the construction?
a) The distance between point A and a point not on the segment
b) The midpoint of points A and B
c) The midpoint between point B and a point not on the segment
d) The distance between points A and B
I think its D but I am not sure
when we copy a segment
we need to make a new segment with the same length, right?
the only one of those that lets us find length is D
so yeah, D is correct.
Thank you
is PX 15cm or PQ?
Anyone need help?
Yes, check above
@fossil ledge px is 15
I know the theorem that two tangents off the same end point of the same circle are congruent
but I’m lost on finding the other two segments
Isint qx 17
This is somewhere in my head, but I havent done this in a long time
Wait no
qx can’t be 17
It's wrong
I know the concept
Ok
my point still stands, work it through with them
Lemme explain
What is yr
17
Good

Can you tell me why?
lol that’s the easy theorem
I just said
I know the theorem that two tangents off the same end point of the same circle are congruent
I’m no idiot dude
Good for you
indeed that is The whole problem
When did I make fun of him
oh wait
well I cant get offended on your behalf, but like bruh
I may be an idiot
what's the perimeter
I can find it from there, thanks for the help

np?
lol, it happens, just remember to read question carefully
Yeah
most courses wont give misleading info until like senior year HS or uni really
I don't think it's possible with that info
it is
Since I’m taking geo soon, can someone tell me what I learn there
@tired laurel a whole lot
geometry
you said with that info
shall I take a pic of a syllabus
oh send syllabus
wOw
i haven't taken geo
I love learning syllabuses
It's just logic
helps me help others
🙃
syllabuses?
dude if you don't know geo don't offer help
jfc you are one pretentious 13 yr old
By I don't know it it means I didint take the course at school
I mean
I took it online
13 year olds don’t take it yet
yes they do
Im gonna take it in school this year
14-15

