#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 202 of 1
This I think @dark sparrow https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/279435476757250049/556834281050210334/nratbig.png?
i'm familiar with the sine and cosine rules dw
it's just that this problem you posted is a bit tricky since it seems like there's plenty of data but it's hard to get a grasp on
alright
@dark sparrow someone atually came up with a solution but I do not understand it
2.sin(150-x).sin(65)=((2+2.cos(x))^.5).sin(85-(x/2))
that is all
either im hallucinating or you can do this with just the fact that sum of angles in triangle is 180
sorry, i got other things to worry about rn
it is alright, thanks for trying anyway!
Did I do this problem right?
oh hi @lone nova
whats the formula for the size of internal angles in regular shapes
_ look at this digon
180(n-2)/n
<@&286206848099549185>
@lament bay
in triangle ABC, let's say the angle at A is α
now what must the angle at B be?
suppose you have a right triangle, with a right angle at C, and from C a height dropping onto point D - and you're choosing which point to name A and which to name B
if you say that the left one is A, you get the situation on the drawing you sent
if you say that the right one is A, you STILL get basically the same situation
all the assumptions: right angle at C, at that D is the foot of the height, STILL WORK
so it makes sense that with your new assignment of letters, point a) would still work: so AD * AB = AC²
but if you look at the picture as if B is on the left and A is on the right, and find out what it means, it means the same as DB * AB = BC² in your old way of naming points
so, b) must be true!
look at the angles
they both share the angle at B
they both also have another right angle
so the third angle of each has to be equal, and so they are similar
to prove b) or c)?
take DB * AB = BC² which has to be proven
divide it by BC and by AB to get an equivalent equation
uh
if DB / BC = BC / AB is true, then b) must be true as well
i think so?
ree proof tables
what triangles i prove similar for c?
i think you'll agree that some triangle you choose has to have AD as one of its sides
ok
likewise some triangle has to have DB as one of its sides
the three triangles to choose from are ABC, ACD, and BCD
CAD=bac?
you won't get DB anywhere then
idk then
which triangle has AD as a side?
cad
and which has DB?
cdb
so you've got just one choice left after all
cad ~ cdb is the thing to prove
how to do it? angles
just name whichever non-right angle alpha, and from that calculate all the other angles
pick whichever you like from angles: dac, acd, bcd, cbd
idk 😦
it doesn't matter which one you choose
dac and acd
ok let's go with dac
now acd = 90 - dac
bcd = 90 - acd = 90 - (90 - dac) = dac
that should be enough to prove that the trianglec acd and bcd are similar
what is confusing
what theorems do i use?
??
you understand that the sum of the 'small' angles in a right triangle is 90 degrees?
and this statement is a theorem?
yes
so what's the problem
prove (AD)(DB)=(CD)^2
yes yes ok, but what's the problem with using "the sum of the 'small' angles in a right triangle is 90 degrees" as a theorem
guess i can't help you with that :/
hmm
what did you do for the 2nd step?
or are all the 2 steps the sum of the 'small' angles in a right triangle is 90 degrees
bcd and acd give 90 in total because picture
bcd = 90 - acd then
you can substitute for acd after that
that's because acd and dac must sum to 90 - look at triangle acd
well what about that :/
what theorem
i have no idea what theorem or what
<BCD+<ACD=90 yes?
yes i know that
so, <BCD=90-<ACD
there aren't that many equations to try to see which one will give you c
maybe, just maybe, homework isn't 100% asking math discord on what to do
make the proportion yourself
idk
if it will give you c), yes
i think it will give c
I apologize if this is too obvious, but why do the trig functions look like this?
think back to the unit circle
Cosinus and Sinus oscillate because if you look go around the unit circle, you come back at the beginning
<@&286206848099549185>
@lament bay, since angle C = 90 degrees, the two triangles created by CD are similar
Hmm
I’m not sure if we can assume that CD bisects angle C perfectly
Hence,
If you can solve that, you'll have your answer.
Those ratios must be the same...
@upper karma . The segment CD is a perpendicular projection.
It creates two similar triangles.
x =/= x + 7 though
If they were similar they would have the same ratio between side lengths
If CD is a length of 12 that implies that the side that both triangles share is the same, so the triangles are congruent, but that contradicts itself since they clearly aren’t
The triangles may share one side, but one triangle's length is the other triangle's width...
You'd have to imagine the angles... In this case the angle cab=bcd and the angle cbd=acd
And these triangles share a 90°
heyyo
so i'm having trouble understanding how to solve this problem
https://cdn.kastatic.org/ka-perseus-graphie/4fef060669261047d838b249057ad15f815e1c0d.png
maximum point is (-2pi, 3) and minimum point is (-pi/2, -4)
as an effect of horizontal streching the cos function of the form
$$h{(x)} = a * cos{(b*x + c)} + d$$
taven:
now the max point is at (0, 3.5)
however, the solution to convert the above graph into the previous one is saying
$$3.5 * \cos{(2/3 (x + 2\pi))} - 0.5$$
taven:
From Kisilev's Planimetry
okay, i have a question about this construction
- why point E is necessarily equidistant from A and B
- why DF = FC
to be honest, the entire thing makes next to no sense to me, since there are straight lines connecting the endpoints of the given segments
(1) E is the midpoint of AB by defn
(2) ditto for F and CD
my understanding is that the point is to construct a quadrilateral such that E and F are midpoints of the sides not given
we are given segments congruent to two of its sides (so we are given segments AD and BC) and the line EF which connects the midpoints of AB and DC. right? so, when we translate AD and BC, why is it already the case that E and F are midpoints?
oh, should this be in one of #❓how-to-get-help channels?
How do you find scale factors?
divide
Divide what lol
xItzDia:
How to squish a square into a circle using matrices
Does such a thing exist or are matrices only for linear things
Maintaining radial ratios
Ie eigenvectors are the infinite set of vectors origination at origin
matrices represent linear transformations only
so u just remember that?
memorise the unit circle tbh
oooo
basically for those angles
x D
so i just memorise that and im gucci
you have 1/2, 1/2 sqrt(2) and 1/2 sqrt(3)
so its basically like
cos(45) is in the middle -> 1/sqrt(2)
idk this picture is not the best but it does illustrate the idea
what about like tan and sin
well this is mostly for sin/cos
sin is next to cos
and tan is just sin/cos
mmk
mmk
i know you @sleek perch
lol
@last lichen sorry for the late reply but
If you're allowed to use the calculator in the exam
yeaaa
cuz if you could you could just square the ans
hence why im asking
reeeee
@lament bay there are three right triangles in the figure, and three unknowns
Ok
Right Triangle with altitude drawn to hyp creates similar triangles
guys, pi is half of a circle so 2pi is a whole circle
the circumference formula is 2pi * r
what does radius have to do with this?
ok nvm i figured it out
It's 2r
Since pi equals to the circumference/diameter
That is the relation you may be looking for
You're welcome
can someone help with this question
The distance from atlanta to savannah is 5 3/4 inches on the map. how long would it take to drive from atlanta to savannah if you drove at an average of 65 miles per hour?
Need a map → size function
How do I solve this
I've never learned the formula relating the sides of a quad before
It’s a ratio
I think you’d need to pair the similar sides and find the ratio.
Then extrapolate x using that ratio and the similar side
you only need 2 sides of each, no?
4/3 = x/27
Is my answer correct @dark sparrow
2.7*
yeah
kk
you only need 2 sides of each, no?
is that not exactly what i did lmao
anyway yes it's 3.6
sorry i didnt look
not possible to do uniquely unless you know the quadrant theta is in (though the two possible values of sin(θ) differ by sign only)
otherwise tho, draw a right triangle
Use $\cos(a+b)=\cos(a)\cos(b)-\sin(a)\sin(b)$
and $\sin(a+b)=\sin(a)\cos(a)+\sin(b)\cos(b)$
Itadakimasu!:
@sharp moon
here's a right triangle
Yea
can you label two of its sides in a way that makes tan(θ) = 2?
(don't overthink it)
2/1?
Sqr root 5?
2 over sqr root 5
and there you have it
∆ABC ~∆DAC (AA similarity postulate)
∆ABC~∆DBA (AA similarity postulate)
Therefore
∆DBA~∆ABC (AA postulate)
If you can't solve it from there, I can post another line of the solution
Let x equal DA
x\2 = 8\x
x^2 = 16
x=4
__
Let y = AB
y\2 = 10\y
y^2 = 20
y = √20
Let z = AC
8/4 = z/√20
z = 2√20
I'm not confident in my answers though.. I only covered it briefly on khan academy a week ago.
Might be wrong
The square roots can still be simplified
@lament bay okay I solved your question using a relatively simple method
You need to utilise Pythagorus (or however you spell his name) theorem whenever you can and form a set of equations, from there, perform substitution to find your desired lengths

Is it not just 360/14, or am i thinking about this wrong?
Like for a triangle it would be 120 degrees, and for a square it would be 90 degrees. So the formula is 360/n, where n is the number of sides of the regular polygon
👍🏼
Why is it that those two values are used?
Ah
?
is sin(x + y) the same as sin(x)sin(y)?
no
k
if it were the case then sin(anything) would be zero lmao
$\sin(x) = \sin(x+0) \overset{?!}= \sin(x)\sin(0) = \sin(x) \cdot 0 = 0$
Ann:
oh

what
imagine
i see who you are
you are that bangladeshi guy who was named Integration By Depression

lol
I need to prove this and I'm not sure where to start, any ideas?
oh sorry
it is the area of a triangle
not a specific type of triangle
well actually, I managed to do it
it always happens when I ask something on here
if i ask something i immediately get the answer myself lol
Can someone explain to me why the answer is A
I didn't know how to do it so i guessed A
and i got it right lol
<@&286206848099549185>

Its derived from this
mg is the magnitude (with a direction) of Fg
Since it's on a slope part of it acts down the slope due to gravity
Is this physics?
yeah
Oh this was on my geometry test so
How can I solve it without basic background knowledge of physics?
<@&286206848099549185> Could someone help me understand how to do this
Do I use a^2 + b^2 = hyp^2
for BC?
use that and then find the angles using basic trig
subtrat 100 from eacj side
then take sqaure root of each side
Wdym
allowed to use calculator?
Yeah
take the square root of 125
thats the lenght of the missing side
So I’m done correct?
depends do you still have to find the angles or no?
Just says find measure
have u learned trig?
Yes
ok then I would assume u gotta fine the angles
Yup
yea so use that on any angle and it should give you the correct angle
Ok also
For this question I would use the same thing a^2 + b^2 =c^2 correct? And after use the sohcahtoa
@raw prism
yea
Ok
since u need all sin cos and tan
Yeah
remember to take the inverse of whatever value u get to find angles
Aight
Now <@&286206848099549185> can someone help me with this
,rotate 270
woah thats convenient
Triangle with sides 10,10,12
yep
I tried using cosine rule but anwser didn't come out right
b^2= a^2+c^2 - 2ac * cos B
yea that
i got 53.1 degrees any chance u could do it and check?
,w Arccos((144-200)/(-20))
i got it right
That's radians
just need to times 2

,w 1.689 radiant to degrees
yea
checked anwers
its 106
i got 53 cause i found half
how about part b though dont know how to do that one
Got answers to check?
I DO LEMME GET THE ANWSER crap caps

anwser is 7.2 N
,Calc 12cos(53)
Result:
-11.019393434545
,Calc 12cos(53degrees)
Result:
7.2217802778246
I need to review resultant angles cuz I suspect is half, but mathematically I suspect its not always
well anyway thanks for guiding me
really appreciate it but since i pretty much suck at math i will prob be back here
WTF
humongous cheese
did he get banned too ?
dwai
yeah they did

You are given a equilateral triangle inscribed in a circle with the center shown. Find the diameter
<@&286206848099549185> Sorry for ping but I need a solution asap
lol
find the circumradius of that triangle
and that's quite easy with the law of sines
@lime flame why do you need solution ASAP? 


also don't expect people to give you solution
I need 50$ ASAP 
If its graded then you're asking us to help you cheat fren
@lime flame
If you put off Hw and about to go to class rip u too

Either way you roasted

Lol :(
consider making a picture
Nope, when you plugged in 36, you forgot to add 48 to it to give you the side of ΔDFE. (DPQE is a trapezoid).
If I have a triangle with side lenghts 2Sqrt(2) 1 and 3
(right triangle)
and theta is opposed to the 1 and the hypotenuse is 3
2 theta*
@cloud meteor What about it?
Nevermind
Vertical angles*
these are vertical angles
no they're just called vertical iirc
Benjamaster7:
I have a question. I was able to prove it by labelling ABCD in a valid way, but the official solution labelled it in a different valid order and thus had a different solution
would it be necessary to prove both cases? the cases are almost the same but have different point names
what have you tried so far and where are you stuck?
do you have any work to show
it would greatly help me help you
as you say
...
hahahahahahahah
@dark sparrow you okay?
someone asked for help and then deleted their own messages
o lol
If <A = 30° and BC = 6, how can I determine AB?
Has to be something w/ the trigonometric functions right?
What do you know about sin cos and tan?
trig is cool
And how about this one?
AC = BC
AB = 4
Calculate the value of the missing sides
looks like one
howd you figure out the angle?
Yea it is
since its not that, then how would you fing the other angles?
well if its a right triangle then just use pythagorean theorem
but other 2 sides are unknown
soap:
ig u can solve it ?
so x^2 +x^2 = 4^2
yeah
im on phone, typing slow
dwai
yes but you still gotta know 2 numbers to solve for the third
??
yes
so is x^2 +x^2 = 16 the final answer then?
$2x^2 = 4$
soap:

lmao
oof now I get it
so what is the answer
sqrt 2
o
wait no, he didnt square the 4
so 2?
bRuH r u high
mAtH

What is the orientation of a plane in space when two of the three variables x,y, and z are missing from its scalar equation
like z = k ?
that's what i was thinking but im not really sure
thats gonna be a plane parallel to both x and y axis and intersects the z axis at k
ohhh i get it, thanks!
how is this correspondence of angles called ? i was doing a trigonometry exercise and i just saw that i needed to know this to solve it
i want to know more about it but i dont know its name haha
there
<@&286206848099549185> i'm stuck on the problem above could someone guide me
@raw prism
Q2 There?
yes
ok
A little messy, but that's splitting everything up
Let's start with the blue. See how I got those angles?
The 60°, 60°, 30° there
yea I understaand that
Perfect, let's move onto the red. Do those components make sense?
I was taught to draw them this way sticking out from each line is that fine too?
Yeah! Whichever is fine for you. I like my method as it shows the right triangles, and makes the trig clear. Either way, know why the red values work
ok
Anyway, we want to add all of the components in the x-direction, to find the net force in the x-direction.
Likewise, we want to add all of the components in the y-direction, to find the net force in the y-direction
Net force in x = 10cos(60) - 10cos(60) + 6cos(30)
ok i got that
14.32
Yus.
Therefore, the net force on the origin is (5.196, 14.32)
Now, what force should we place on the origin to cancel that out?
the same ones in the opposte direction?
The net force, in the opposite direction. Throw (-5.196, -14.32) on there, and the forces will balance out
i can just throw it in?
That will be the resultant, as it is the force that keeps anything from moving
so the y resultant should be my answer for "in direction of PQ"
and for maginitude I just take square of both x and y results, add them and then take square root right?
Yus yus
thanks alot
It will be longer than 14.32
ye got 15.23
@umbral snow one last question for now. how would I know which angle to use the 30 degrees between the line and the y axis or the 60 degrees between the line and the x axis
If it ain't Supernatural Season 16, Idk why anyone would be that excited.
@tired current plz dont multi post
<@&286206848099549185>
@unique patio
Not enough info there. I'm thinking α is set for you in the question
That's different. Now I know the body is static
So, the sum of the forces on the seat is 0
Sum of X:
40 = P1sinα + P2sinα
Sum of Y:
50 + 75 = P1cosα + P2cosα
It's easiest to take the moment about the top left.
M = 0 = 0.4P2cos(α)
So there, that's three equations with three unknowns:
sinα(P1 + P2) = 40
cosα(P1 + P2) = 125
0.4P2cosα = 0
@unique patio
Okay, if that's enough! Feel free to ask if you have anything else
I’m given cos(x) = 0.788 how do I find x?
Also in another question I’m given sin(x) = 0.6 how do I find cos(x)
cos(x) = 0.788
x = cos¯¹(0.788)
You can move the cos to the other side, but it's cos¯¹ if you do
The other one is a bit harder. If you think you got it, good luck!
does anything weird/special/interesting happen when you do arctan2(x,y) instead of arctan2(y,x)?
somehow my functions are working with the former syntax
i know that's technically not correct though
That's weird
Hello. A Question to curve Discussion: Is the average of the two extreme points in a x³ function always the turning point?
Yes, because the average of the roots of a quadratic is always its vertex
@torpid perch
Itadakimasu!:
I think you’re asking for the average of two roots of the cubic function instead of the two extreme points
Then the answer is clearly no
I don’t understand where the 16x comes from
[highlighted]
The answer is correct I just don’t understand where it came from
is that $16 \times 192 \tan 22.5 ^\circ$ ?
Dragon:
You divided the polygon into 16 equal parts then computed the area of one part, so in order to calculate the total area, you need to multiply 16 to it
Ah I see now tnx so much man 👍🏼
Also
If your not given an apothem and base what would I do
Isn’t it like base times number of sides
Actually nvm i figures it out
That’s great 
<B = 60°
AC = 9√3
Find AB
What have you tried so far?
The answer to this is correct but I was wondering why the polygon was divided into 16 different parts
Feel free to @me
because this
Oh ok so “make it simpler” basically
Yeahh
Is the 2 in square root because of the square being split in two?
Wait is why is there a square root of 3 in this problem
There's a formula for the 30°, 60°, 90° triangles but you could still use the Pythagorean theorem to find 4√[3]
8²+4²+A²
64=16+A²
48=A²
A=√[48]=√[4²·3]
A=4√[3]
I get the reasoning but I don’t understand how would I distinguish special rights triangles
Just gotta memorize that 45°-45°-90°, and 30°-60°-90° are special right* triangles. When memorizing the unit circle, that's where you'd derive those formulas.
Ok but like how am I supposed to know if it’s 45-45 or 30-60 if I’m only given a 90 degree angle
Well I'm assuming it's for the normal polygons, in which case you could use the formula:
,, \frac{(n-2)*180}{n}
𝓗𝑒𝓃𝓇𝓎 𝓒𝒶𝓈𝓉𝓁𝑒:
To find the angle of each corner.
👍🏼 Tnx
hi guys, I just joined this server and have some issues with my hw
I think i'm supposed to put it in uh
I dont know the name but it's in the form of x=(2pi/3)+2(pi)k, k is equal to all integers
And that's where my issue arises, I have no clue how to find the rest of the angles
oh shit didn't read the rules
Maybr
Triangles UVT and RSV are exactly the same?
Obviously cuz same center
RT = RS?
I’m lost what?
So you have 2 triangles correct?
Yea
Is there any more information?
No just that
17
17?
Idk how to get it
Looking for a physicist
Degrees?
Alright then
Np
The line y=(x/4)-9 is moved two units to the left and five units upwards in the coordination system. Calculate the moved line's equation
I'm really struggling with the Analytical Geometry that we were given today
take two points of the line
then calculate where they will move
actually now that i think about it
you only need one point
since the slope of the line won't change
Idk why I'm finding this so difficult
well some point (x,y) becomes (x-2, y+5) right
Yeah
so take any point that lies on the line
Should I rewrite the equation as y-5 = (x+2)/4 - 9?
(y+5) = (x-2)/5 - 9 you mean
I don't know why, our books show us that instead of writing +5 if it goes upwards, we're supposed to write -5 to get it back to its original position
y = (x+2)/4 -9 - 5
That works too, right?
yes
Here's where I'm a little confused
X/4 has a denominator of 4
And everything else has a denominator of 1
Should I multiply everything by 4?
you could do that
But then I'd get 4y
then divide by 4 after simplifying the right side
Idk, that's just how I'm used to writing it.
I mean, that many parenthesis are not necessary

difference of squares
cos 2x
ya I gotta verify that its cos2c
whoops shouldnt probably give answer
funeris, try plotting
y = x/4 - 1/4
kek
Remember that (a-b)*(a+b) = a^2 - b^2
See where I am going?
if that is true, then also, (a^2-b^2)*(a^2+b^2) = a^4-b^4
now think what a and b is in your case...
now what
Don't you remember? sin^2 x + cos^2 x = 1
😃
So that term is eliminated.... you are left with cos^2 x - sin^2 x
Hmm sin 4x is not 4sin x cos x
2 sin 2x cos 2x
not sure about the first line...
if the line sin 4x - sin 2x is correct, next line could be 2 sin 2x cos 2x - sin 2x, which you could simplify to sin 2x(2 cos 2x - 1) if i didnt make an error 😃
or to 2 sin 2x(cos 2x - 0.5)
yup so I do I get the right side from that bulllllshit
second last line is not =sin2x its -sin2x
Like I said I'm not sure about the first line, I didn't check that
and not sure if you need to prove in the first assignment that cos^2x - sin^2 x is cos 2x, or is that known. it's not hard to prove though, but anyway
yes first problem is done.
this one is same idea. I have to prove that the left side of first line equals the right side of the 1st line
But I think that is correct
ya the cos2x first problem was known
I dont get where this ^3 comes from on the right side
Wait, hmm
Okay I think that is correct
It's just way to substitute trigonometric functions with another
The ^3 thing I mean. Sometimes you want equations with ^3 or something, sometimes with sin 2x, sin 3x, but no exponent... depends on the situation
I just get stuck like I am now. tf do I do after this last line to expand it into the right side so I can say it checks out
I swear you posted this before
thx
The length is one inch more than the width, which is one inch more than the height. The volume is 160.875 cubic inches.
i need to find the length, width and height
so would that mean
L+1=W
L+2=H
no
oh
ok, so we're
160.875 = L x H x W
plug that stuff in
160.875 = L(L+2)(L+1)
is that the right way?
ye
ok, heres the part that confuses me, that ends up to be
160.875 = L^3 + 3L^2 + L
can i use the quadratic formal on that or does it have to be done as
160.875 = L(L^2+ 3L+ 1)
@empty trout did u figure it out
wait 15 minutes before pinging helpers
Oh okay
do you know half angle formula
yes pls
Ok
is it possible for u to pm me?
Yep
thx
@oblique bough
Oof thanks
Lol
?
ASS
nOni
K
U didnt arcsin it
Here is a hint
If u ever get domain error or error of some sort
Then it doesnt exist
In this case
If u ever get sin of an angle equals a value more than one, then there are no triangles, but check your math just in case
omg im dumb lmao, i should use arcsin
Yes
U forgot to have sin still there
Sin C equals 1.4
But of you know the unit circle, Sin of any angle will never be greater than 1
oof, ok thanks
Any more help?
lemme try this out first
K
ok, so i tried it and i still got 1.4
Tell me what you did to get 1.4
62/44(sin88)
1.4
sinC=1.4
then i cant solve the triangle?
It means




