#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 198 of 1
hmm
so you can't $\iff$ here
Tuong:
$(x-1/2+iy)^4=64$ translates into $x-1/2+iy\in{2\sqrt2,i2\sqrt2,-2\sqrt2,-i2\sqrt2}$
Tuong:
And then you can get 4 distinct solutions I guess
$1^{1/3}$
Autistic Hoodie:
Autistic Hoodie:
$(1(cos0 + isin(0)))^{1/3}$
Autistic Hoodie:
Autistic Hoodie:
That's good
What is the trick with
$\sqrt{-3(cos\frac{\pi}{4}+isin\frac{\pi}{4}})$
Autistic Hoodie:
Is it not
$\sqrt{-3}(cos\frac{\frac{\pi}{4}+2k\pi}{2} +isin\frac{\frac{\pi}{4}+2k\pi}{2})$
Autistic Hoodie:
i think you're confusing $x^{1/n}$ and the $n$th roots of $x$
Tuong:
I mean, the notations
How?
$x^{1/n}$ is the image of $x$ given by the function $t\longmapsto t^{1/n}$, it's ONE $n$th root of $x$, but there are other
Tuong:
when you're asked to find the $n$th roots of $x$, the question isn't about finding $x^{1/n}$
Tuong:
the notation in this is bad
What do I do now..
use the formula, but keep in mind you're allowed to judge the material you're given
$\sqrt[n]r\left(\cos\frac{\varphi+2k\pi}n+i\sin\frac{\varphi+2k\pi}n\right)$ for $k$ in ${0, ..., n-1}$ where $r=|x|$ and $\varphi$ is an argument of $x$ are indeed $n$ distinct $n$th roots of $x$
Tuong:
I have found a trick
I can convert the complex number into trigonometric form and back to normal form
and it will looks like
$3(cos\frac{3\pi}{4} +isin\frac{3\pi}{4})$
Autistic Hoodie:
And I can then find the root of it
use cyclic properties
find x
i cant do this for the life of me
even though i've done problems similar and been fine
15/9 = 1.667
so
1.667(2x - 1) = 3x?
that gives me x = 5
but how can the hypotenuse = one of the bases
does that not defy the pythagorean theorem

still stumped
@void osprey have you tried setting both sides to equal eachother?
i already figured it out @wind gale
wasn't confused at how to do the problem
i was confused since i assumed it was two right triangles
Ah I see
hello i need help
find the distance between A and B
ok then
then you gotta think about the ration
well you are summing up 2n arcsines, which all sum up to n*pi
and arcsin always outputs a value between -pi/2 and pi/2
so the only way of getting that is : all the arcsines output pi/2
ie all the x_r's equal 1
@old seal
If I have f(x)=2tan(x) since tan doesn’t have a amplitude how do you label the 2?
ok sorry about that
Y u ping b4

You know sine and cosines?
Draw a line from B to D
Fill in unknowns
yes
I was trying to do that
but the answer was incorrect
sorry if I am not as smart as you

Well

welll

this is what I wrote
I called the line that DB as y
and wrote that
y^2= AB^2+16^2 - 2 * 16 * ABcos120
y^2= (AB+5)^2+25^2-225(AB+5)cos60
then I solved it but I could not get the answer
help me you geniuses
In the function f(x)=3tan(x) what do you label the 3?
It’s trig
yeah
well, you're right, it's not the amplitude
it's just a scaling factor
or the coefficient of tanx
when do you use inverse sohcahtoa?
Thanks @drowsy spoke
oh ok thanks sorry lol
does anyone know why there are so many variatiosn of Menlaus thereom...
is there a general case or do I have to learn all the individual ones
@dry glen where'd you get stuck? upload your working
y^2= AB^2+16^2 - 2 * 16 * ABcos120
y^2= (AB+5)^2+25^2-225(AB+5)cos60
I can't solve this
for some reason
@drowsy spoke
y^2= AB^2+16^2 - 2 * 16 * ABcos120
y^2= (AB+5)^2+25^2-225(AB+5)cos60
the two bold things are equal to y², ie the bold things are equal to each other
AB^2+16^2 - 2 * 16 * ABcos120 = (AB+5)^2+25^2-2 * 25(AB+5) * cos60
then?
I did that
and then I can't solve it
cos 120 = -1/2
i substituted that value and I can't find it
is there a way to not put in -1/2
and solve it?
@hard gale

I'm sorry
why would you not ?
cause I can't find the answer when I did that
i'm sorry
you guys seem angry
can you please solve it for me onece
@hard gale
~~AB²+~~16² +16AB = ~~AB²+~~10AB+25+25² - 25(AB+5)
(expanding everything + replacing the cos)
31 AB = 25+25²-125-16²
AB = 269/31
ugliest shit ever
yea... IB math is rarted
What's the easiest way to find z^4
with z i mean (x+iy)^4
where I do not know x and y
can anyone help with this
With what @upper karma ?
It's easy
Do you know the formula for the distance between two points
That's the formula @upper karma
You following @upper karma ?
yes sorry i was eating
ALright
Do you know the coordinates of the ship?
You can get them form the graph
i cant do it dude ima drop out
It's super easy -_-
Look
It's (-3, 8) where x = -3 and y = 8
Do you understand how I got the coordinates?
bruh
@hard gale thanks
may someone please help me understand this
u know the double angle formula for tan?
How do you solve 1.25sin(x) = x , for other than x=0 ?
analytically ? dont think its possible
you can use numerical methods to get an approximation tho
,w solve 1.25sinx-x=0

Thanks
i need some help
if you know cos of theta is 9/41 how can you find the inverse sin and tan
pythagoras' theorem
@upper karma im just tripping on how to start it
the adjacent is 9 and the hyp is 41
so use pythag for the other side
== sqrt(41^2 - 81)
oh lol mathbot is gone
,calc sqrt(41^2 - 81)
Result:
40
@upper karma tyty
have a math test i need to clutch today
2 sqroot of 13 i
is it the same as 2i sqroot of 13
wot
Imaginary Roots of Negative Numbers Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/precalculus/imaginary_complex_precalc/i_precalc/v/i-as-the-princi...
you want the square roots of 13i?
at the end of the very vid he said thats the most simplified you can get to
i wrote 2i sqroot 13
@gritty siren ooh i meant 13
oof
@gritty siren basically im asking are these the same
2sqrt(13)i = 2i sqrt(13),
yea they're the same
On a coordinate plane A(0,0) and B(20,20) what is the distance of AB note each unit is 10 feet
Also round to nearest feet
I got 283 ft can someone check that for me?
Does anyone have a trick or mnemonic for remembering that
$\int \sin(x) = -\cos(x)$
cornelius:
Is there a specific way to calculate this graph on the calculator? I could get rid of everything except B and D
what he said
@timid saffron just know your trig derivatives tbh
is this right?
it was
@upper karma how many dimensions? and how many solutions can there be? cause even in two dimensions you ll have infinitely many if i m not mistaken cause rotating u and v simultaneously does not affect the three conditions
@upper karma the three vectors from a triangle with those side lengths. the angles they form can be calculated and that between u and v must be kept constant. since you know their lengths you can then get expressions for u and v dependent on some angle lets call it phi. just add them then and you ll have the geenral expression interms of phi
So i did all my calculations accurately
but when i put it in desmos i get this
i have been look for mistakes the past 30 mins. I am brain ded. Can someone tell me what i am doing wrong.
( question is calculate the circumcircle and the equation of the circle )
tag me when someone replies
@glad falcon That moment when you say 13/14 instead of 3/14.
@tropic shard 🤦 Thanks my man ! 😃
is there a website or youtube channel where I can learn some geometry?
@sacred cradle proffesor leonard
Professor Leonard does Geometry?
umm maybe. i just said his name cuz i have seen him cover nearly everything. 😅
@tropic shard btw u know when it says what is the closest horizontal distance between point a and b
i thought u would have to calculate the distance so that the slope is none
Hm.
but when i read the answers it said u would have to take the perpendicular line to that
and then see the distance
i know i didnt explain properly but heres the question
Question D
I'll graph it and see how that works, lol.
Yes. i think that is what the mean too
but i need an explanation on why that is the closest distance
Hm.
I'm not sure how to explain it besides imagining moving the point along the function and measuring the distance xD
There's a video of it using calculus, but you'll need to know derivitives for that video.
Since we have a line, you wouldn't need to use calculus, so lemme think of a way to translate from calculus to algebra.
nvm, you know what, just imagine a circle, I'll graph one.
Ok..
Did you post something?
Oh ok lol, I saw it for like a split second
Since that line is a tangent to the circle
Yup
That is the only point that would touch it . ( at one point )
so that is the place where the radius meets the line
You got it
so if it was some other point on the line. It wouldn't be the shortest !
Yea ! 😃 Thanks Man That is way more clear now
Oh yea and the rule.
when the tangent meets the rad. It is 90 degrees therefore it is perpendicular !
Aight So i have another question
So in this problem
Ab and OC clash
if i changed the route so that it went from A to C to B to O
would the distance remain the same
you can use point slope form to get the equations of the lines then find their intersecting coord, and use dist formula to compare dists
does any one have time to help a struggling boi
to solve this I would need to prove thatthe smaller triangle is similar
what would that be?
I would say 5/3. You see, if AD is half of DC, then AC=3*AD. So you use Thales theorem and you have 1/3=DE/5.
this is SAT stuff
I dont know thales theorem
is there a simpler method to find that solution?
But the thing is... that's the simplest method, according to me. Maybe ask the helpers ?
By the way, what is SAT ?
I understand
The Angle-Angle postulate will help you prove the two are similar. They share an angle, and each has a right angle. Therefore, they have two (ultimately meaning they have three) congruent angles and, thus, are similar.
what would be the shared angle?
Angle A
oh and the 90?
And the right angles.
Angle EAD equals Angle BAC
And they each have a right angle, so those are congruent as well
and so the big triangle has legs of 5 and 3x
how would we use that to solve the smaller one
with the ratios
By using the ratios, you would get 5/3. However, what is the length of AC in fact ?
So that was an x.
5/3x = ED/x
so 5/3
X cancels in each side, leaving ED = 5/3
Yes. I know that in my country, we're used to learn that theorem which tells that in fact.
can you prove a quadrilateral is a parallelogram but not a rectangle given two adjacent right angles?
Hello?
Someone mind helping me with this problem I’m struggling to solve it
<@&286206848099549185>
what shape is that Lol
serious question?
Is T on the circle of radius R + Rh?
looks like i made a mistake with the drawing
T is suppose to be alittle bit above the top of the circle
and R is the distance from the center of the circle to the top of the shape(not circle) and Rh is the radius
for sin and cos, there's a
$\frac{\sqrt 0}2,\ \frac{\sqrt 1}2,\ \frac{\sqrt 2}2,\ \frac{\sqrt 3}2,\ \frac{\sqrt 4}2$
Tuong:
the volume describes this what is enclosed by the edges
and area describes what the figures that are formed by the edges cover
if so why the volume of a right triangular prism is smaller than it's total area
i understand why is it so but i can't possibly imagine it
consider a cube of side length 1 meter
its volume is 1 m³, but it has 6 sides which are each 1 m², so its surface area is 6 m²
Well, you can't really compare cubic metres and square metres...
Could anyone help me memorize the trig identities like cos(a+b) and cos^2 something is one? Help me in like an hour please
$cos(a+b)=cos(a)cos(b)-sin(a)sin(b)$
TSM64CM:
I would rather say that cos changes the plus to a minus... and that it gathers cos and sin on the same side...
And about the other one... Which one ?
Because there are several formula for cos²(x)...
There's a good bit of formulas involving the cosine squared
$\cos^2(x) + \sin^2(x) = 1$
BuilderBudCarl:
I was thinking about that one too.
that's the Pythagorean identity
This one is just Pythagoras theorem on the trigonometrical circle.
there's another one that you can get from the identity TSM posted above - the case where a = b
$\cos(2x) = \cos^2(x) - \sin^2(x)$
BuilderBudCarl:
and if you use Pythagorean on that and substitute the sine squared, you get this
$\cos(2x) = 2\cos^2(x) - 1$
BuilderBudCarl:
No need to go on complex numbers, or should I still do that ?
wait, did he also want Euler's formula?
maybe we could tag him
@marsh spruce awaken from thy slumber and tell us what identities thou desire
Wherefore art thou, Rising_Lamp ?
Hello everyone, I have a question about maths
geometry*
This is an assigment that I have to do
And Im having problems with the object Nr. IV
I know that the side next to the right trapezoid is equal to 4
Anyone know the formula of slope?
Sorry @sudden lance @sweet hazel I was busy but I'm here now
Fine. So what was the formula you were talking about ?
The phythegorean identity, even-odd identities, the simplicity identity (the ones that factors stuff like (cos^2x + sins)(cos^2x + sins), the formulas to prove identities, the sum and difference identity, and the double angle formula
Hi what is a nice phrase to describe this
Equidistant? Contour lines? Loci? Polygons?
The idea is the linear interpolation of points that maintains constant ratio of distance AX/XP where A is an arbitrary point in the square, P is every point on the perimeter of the square and X is the locus/trajectory to describe
X happens to create those other
Squares
right nested?
If i want to find the distance of the altitude
how would i do that
I know how to find Point A
A = intersection point of B and y intercept & c and y intercept
wdym altitude? As in the yellow line? Like you said, it's when the line associated with point B (f₁)
and the line associated with point C (f₂) intersect (i.e. 0=f₁-f₂).
And to find what the f (function) of each line is, you'd need to use y=mx+b, where m is the rise over run.
f₁-f₂=0 will let you solve for x, but you want y, so you'd plug it (the x) back into either f₁ or f₂ (it'll give the same y value) and voila, you'll get the altitude.
can someone explain real quick whats arcsine arccos and arctan are
$sin(θ)=\frac{Opposite}{Hypotenuse}$, $arcsin(\frac{Opposite}{Hypotenuse})=θ$
MathLyfe:
So can nyone help me with my assigment?
@valid pike
Yes
First you have to solve for BC.
Then you have to solve for CD.
After which you do:
the law of sines
Ohhh
Set DBE = 90 - x
here let me type it out
sin (90 - x + 20) / (16 + CD) = sin (x) / (BC)
I did this after noting that BCE is a triangle
np
Have I done this right
I found this problem online where they ask you to find the volume of the glass using the measurements provided in cm. Just thought I'd leave this here in case someone would like to give it a try.
No habla
@valid pike I explained what the problem says. Find the volume using the numbers on the drawing.
@acoustic peak is this question possible without some form of calculus? geometry seems to be pushing it
though i', sure it can be done
using geometry alone
@faint orchid No idea, I don't know how to solve this and I don't know calculus, just thought some people here might enjoy giving it a try.
@acoustic peak is this a problem you need to solve for homework or just for fun?
I think I can solve it if given enough time
Just for fun, I found it online.
Rip. not really worth my time then
Without further instructions the problem is incredibly ill defined.
solving for the first bottom half of the glass seems really simple. You have a cone with a radius of 2.5cm and height of 2.5cm as well, using the formula for the volume of a cone leads to 16.36cm cubed
Ugh I'm getting tired of all these trivial questions @timber hinge
sry
Yeah pls go back to middle school
Like, start with the volume of the 32 dimensional genus cuboid and apply the isomorphism Louiville theorem to reduce the determinant of the regularized angle. In radians, of course
Don't forget to settle with an orthogonal ideal ofc
hi
anyone have a second for a person who is very mathematically challenged?
this is literally very basic i just can't seem to learn it. it's like geometric trigonometry if you can call it that
i have to find missing angle measurements and i'm like at a loss of what to do
Just post the problem my man
this is gonna sound strange but i just figured it out like 5 seconds after u posted this
yw
Ah here we go
How would I solve this? Literally looked everywhere and am at a brick wall
I solved thankfully the past 28 but this one just doesnt relent
I need to find X
Using tan, sin, cos
@upper karma You needed help with 29?
Most calculators are set on Radians, but to get 21.3 as the answer you'll need to set it to degrees.
Oh nice :)
but my question is how do i decide if it's tan/sin/cos in these situations
You know SOHCAHTOA?
i mean i get theres an opposite and an adjacent
yeee yeah it's just
how did you decide this
it's based on the angle?
Yup.
ahhhh so why does the 'y' side have to be involved in finding the 2nd part
?
Since we don't know what opp is.
So you have 2 variables, which is not possible to solve by itself.
okay, that makes sense
can i post a picture of the next and for me final problem, then solve it and check it with you real quick?
Sure
Nope,
rip lmao
Opposite is the side that the angle doesn't touch
oh adjacent and hypot
Yup
just use sine rule tbh
wat ?
there adjacent and hypot
*the
is the same wait 
okay now i'm tripping myself up
oh wait
??
nope im lost

The dashed line is the same side for both triangles, which side is it (opposite, adj, hypontenuse?)
Oh its adj
Thus cos(42) = 30/19 ?
No
I mean
Lmao, I said i was bad at this
Didnt think this bad
Welp, lost again
oooh okay
that actually makes sense tho
just a hidden y
thank you guys, i'll use such methods to work out some more and check them now i have a basic grasp
i just used that logic and got the right answer
wow thanks so much ❤
@plucky marlin uhhhh
okay so turns out one is still plaguing me
30.)
i'm doing O/H
but the answer isnt coming to be what is expetced
expected
ikr
i tried and it's like
nope, sorry sacro, you're dumb
i did
sin(67) = y/44
which gave me 40.502
so i thus applied the same over there
sin(46) = x/40.502
and i'm pretty sure this is where i went wrong
can somone help me with trig
- altitudes are perpendicular and medians bisect, so yes
- uh what
- isosceles triangle I THINK?
10 may be that the intersections form a line known as Eulers line
That is, the circumcenter, orthocenter, and the centroid
Those three points are all colinear, and it is known as eulers line.
I would say 11 is equilateral
@glad falcon
10 would be more like the fact that median, perp bisector and altitude of the base are actually the same line
We're not even talking about intersections of all of those lines, since we're focusing only on those of the base
and iirc Euler's line isn't even specific of an isosceles triangle
I didn’t even read the isosceles bit lol, my bad
Idk where to put this
a) 29 right?
for b you go to 20 and across then down?
so 91?
and c) 20?
I think this website is broken
@mighty sand
This is trigonometry. Have you not been taught any? And you're still expected to know it?

when u take online school and ur teacher keeps trying to call u about plagarism
yeet

sssssssss
wait im a day late

In a rectangle ABCD points E and F are on the sides BC and CD respectively in such a way that the triangle AEF is equilateral. The point M is the middle of AF. Prove that the triangle BCM is equilateral.
Try getting the entire equation in terms of just sine or cosine.
anyone up for this one?
idk if this is the right channel, nobody could figure it out in the other one
The line $y = 2x+7$ is dilated through the center $(-2,-1)$ with a factor scale of $b$ giving $y=2x-13$. Find $b$!
Rumoden:
Can anybody give me any clues regarding this?
Does the graph of cotangent have a hole in the x intercept?
Everywhere I want to plot the x intercept of cotangent there is a hole. How do you properly graph cotangent on paper?
<@&286206848099549185>
Lmao, is that b factorial or is your teacher enthusiastic
Try to imagine unwrapping the unit circle onto the x-axis
Me?
Yeah
I'm not too experienced in graphs of trig functions but I think that that would be valid
It's defined within integral multiples of pi<x<2pi if I understand correctly
on those two bounds it goes undefined
0<x<Pi
Same as you but starting at origin
Ah yesyes
So try to trace out the asymptotes, and then fill in the rest of the function between them
But when I look for the x intercept I got a hole in the calculator
There is no asymptote of pi/2 in the functions f(x)=cot(x)
But there is a hole there
Tangent within 0<x<pi looks the same within -pi<x<0
It shoots up at the end and starts the interval shooting up from the bottom
I thiiiiink
Lemme check and make sure I'm not feeding you false information
Oh shit nvm ignore everything I said lmao I'm retarded
On the graph there appears to be a point along the y-axis
so Idk why you keep getting holes
sorry m8 ):
Oh the x-intercept
Hmm
I don't even know how to help you even though I'm looking directly at the graph
Do you know what the general image of f(x)=tan(x) looks like?
Ya but I need 1/tan(x)
OOOOH
Tan x does not have holes in it
It is asymptotic though
So you can consider those holes
Because it's undefined at 2pi, it should be undefined within 2kpi where k is an integer
Ok well I’m trying to graph this accurately
You don’t include a point for a limit do you
?
Never. Only the points infinitely close to it.
Ok here’s the scratch of my graph.. you are saying just make a random mark and say that’s where it crosses?
Uhhh... honestly man
I'm not too sure, so if nobody else answers you, I'd find a video
Sorry my dood
Looks pretty accurate to me
You can check with Desmos graphing calculator if you like
and if it's wrong, you can still ask why it's wrong
Ok @upper karma haha asked my prof
There is no hole. Calculator does not have cotangent only 1/tangent
1/undefined = undefined, but if you set cos/sine = 0
You get 0/1 so there is no hole/asymptote
A plane can be defined by three points, a point and a line and two lines
I understand how to find the plane formula with three points
But how do I find it with two lines?
They'll need to intersect somewhere. Let that intersection be the point
Now it's a point and a line again.
I was just thinking about that, if they don't intersect it doesn't define a plane, does it? That statement is not entirely correct then?
That statement - a plane can be....
If you take 3 collinear points you're pretty screwed that's for sure
Oh that too
Found it
The normal of the plane is the cross product of the two lines
Then I just pick a point of the lines and that's it
I believe this works each time?
I think you mean vectors and not lines
Well yeah, the vectors of the lines
Yeah that works
How about if a line and a point is defined
I guess I could make a new line with the first line and the point and use the same method afterwards
since the first line has a point starting point
Yeah
Awesome, I like how one method mixes with the other one ^^
Well, that's chapter 1 of vector calculus
Yeah, I am repeating everything for the semester, linear algebra, vectors, analytical geometry, derivatives, sequences and series
I have my last test in Monday for this semester, I failed the last one :/
Based on parallelogram props
Does anyone know how to prove that alpha + beta + gamma = 90 degrees?
maybe use arcsin and smth like arcsin(AE/AF)+arcsin(AE/AG)+arcsin(AE/AH) = 90
sin B = 1/sqrt5
sin Y = 1/sqrt10
sin(B+Y) = (1/sqrt5)(3/sqrt10) + (1/sqrt 10)(2/sqrt5) = 3/sqrt50 + 2/sqrt50 = 5/sqrt50 = 5/(5sqrt2) = 1/sqrt 2. Since B+Y < 90, B + Y = 45 and a + B + Y = 90
(Y = gamma :p)
Thank you
how great is numberphile tho
numberphile is very good at explaining things three to six times as slowly as they could be explained
@swift thorn exactly like most professors in my univ
edit: i'll not be lazy and will return when i need help for things i cant do
Can you help me with Geometry?

ok
solve for the letters
@upper karma construct a cyclic quadrilateral
then use inscribed angle theorem
for the second ine
nope it wouldn't be that js is that not a math sin?
because that expanded would not be the original expression
need help solving this identity
f(x)=3tan(x). the 3 there is not an amplitude is it? Im asking for the label of the 3 not what it's doing to the graph of the function. Just what we call the 3. Is there a proper label?
@hallow smelt I don't think it has a label, not sure tho
@tranquil wigeon its not an amplitude though?
@hallow smelt not an amplitude, it doesn't have any
@tranquil wigeon would you call that 3 the amplitude if we swap tan for sec and csc?
i know thats why were we start the graphs for both of those, but unsure what to call the |A| of those functions either
thats where we start the graphs**
@tranquil wigeon the guy on khan academy called it a scalar
@hallow smelt for csc and sec are considered not having amplitudes either. A scalar works, but they really don't say alot
@dense tundra use the angle sum formula for cos
,rotate
well, look at where x+2 and 3x-14 are in the diagram
they're part of the same diagonal
if x+2 equals 3x-14, then they're both the same size
they're both half of the diagonal
So C
yeah
👍

I don't think a and b are reasonable
answer C I did consider
but D sounds better to the ear
D is a line? option a and c make D sound like a point
no, i think this is just a very awful diagram
i would not be able to solve this question!
and it's not just any trapezoid, it's a symmetric one
yeah, because it's a symmetric trapezoid, angle W is the same as angle X
and likewise angles Y and Z are the same
yeah
i think we both know you know how to get the answer
trapezoid formula?
I'm not sure how to solve this
triangles are 180
360
= 68
yes
@foggy zealot can you also say since Sec = 1/Cos and Cos = 1/Sec
that Cos(x) * Sec(x) = 1?
yes
thats cool we went over all the identities and i don't think our prof mentioned that cos(x)*sec(x)=1
must also mean sin(x)*csc(x)=1
wait
so do cos(x)*sec(x)=Sin(x)*csc(x) @foggy zealot
that means sin(x) = cos(x)*sec(x)/csc(x)? hahaaa
sin(x) = x tbh
,w pi/2
do not do that

lmao thats not how it works at all
wdym
that IS how it works man
im a physicist
thats how we do it in my town
also cos(x) = 1
stop that
soap:
i dont know what that is
okay lemme write that in sum notation
restrict sin to 0-2pi
$\sin(x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^nx^{2n + 1}}{(2n + 1)!}$
soap:
oh right
infinity is not something we deal with regularly
i dont even know how to read what you wrong as a whole
i can kinda real each symbol piece by piece
yes im aware, but you don't really look at the entire domain just a period

when you are trying to figure out what the graph is doing i mean
Well it's 1 only close to zero
if sin(x)*csc(x) = 1 and sec(x)*cos(x) =1 then sin(x)*csc(x)=sec(x)*cos(x)?
that was my question
yeah
and then sin(x)*csc(x)/sec(x)=Cos(x)?
,w sin(x)csc(x)=sec(x)cos(x) true or false ?

keep replacing them with eachother
sure
thats really cool hahaa
@plucky marlin yo can you explain big o notation, I really don't understand the meaning of in, in Taylor series.
i dont either
Uhg
lel
is that trig?
Whoops
big o notation? that sounds made up
No
it's literally called big O notation
ya lol
i'm the president of mit
i mainly answer the stats questions, but im trying to really understand trig

i rejected your app personally b/c i'm evil
president of mit? o_O
is there a name for the fact you can algebra the trig functions into infinity
them hiring me? lol
what do you mean by 'algebra them to infinity'?
biggest bruh moment rn. Discord: https://discord.gg/hwcVZQw
if sin(x)csc(x) = 1 and sec(x)cos(x) =1 then sin(x)csc(x)=sec(x)cos(x) and then sin(x)*csc(x)/sec(x)=Cos(x) i can keep doing that
im assuming i can do that to infinity
I love how mysterious you are @plucky marlin
Just shooting these questions
replace the cos in sin(x)*csc(x)=sec(x)*cos(x) with sin(x)*csc(x)/sec(x) and then solve for sin(x)
One after another
m8
plug in the solution then refill the cos you get from that
you're just squaring everything
the third step is the equation in the first step squared
[sin(x)*csc(x)]^2=[sec(x)cos(x)]^2 = sin(x)*csc(x)=sec(x)*sin(x)*csc(x)/sec(x)
is that what you are saying?
sin(x)csc(x) = 1
sec(x)cos(x) =1
sin(x)csc(x)=sec(x)cos(x)
sin^2(x)csc^2(x) = 1
i dont understand how you get sin^2(x)*csc^2(x)=1
sin(x)csc(x)=sec(x)cos(x)
multiplied both sides by sin(x)csc(x), or if it makes sense I took the denominator of the fraction on the RHS to the left
you can do that because we established it equals 1 and multiplying by 1 is ok
right?
,$ \sin x \csc x = \sec x \cos x\
\sin x \csc x = \frac{1}{\sin x \csc x}\
\sin x \csc x (\sin x \csc x )= \sin x \csc x (\frac{1}{\sin x \csc x})\
(\sin x \csc x )^2 = 1\
\sin^2 x \csc^2 x = 1\
Kelsier:
oh wait
i think i made a mistake
i actually started writing it out on paper
turns out im just dividing by one over and over hahaa
do you see what i meant though?
Ok so i have practised alot for my Maths Coordinate Geometry Internal
and have nearly finished all the resources i had
i found out that the hardest question on the test is a word problem related to perpendicular stuff.
what should i do
S
So I calculate d all the distances
But it says each square is 10k so do I multiple by 10k? @twin prawn
No, each unit square area is 10k, so each unit length is only the square root of that, so 100
You need to multiply by 100
Ohhhh yes .
I need to keep that in mind during the exams thanks ma dude
@twin prawn
Np 🍮
Problem:
A and B are antipodal points on a circle.
C and D are two other points on the circle.
Prove that the projections of AC and BD on CD are equal.
Is it possible to find/estimate the angles of each vectors, where two rotating vectors will intersect each other, given the vectors and rotation axis?
I'm currently using the rotation formula, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodrigues'_rotation_formula
@slate phoenix What have you tried?




