#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages Β· Page 197 of 1
1 and 3 is equal to?
Oh okay.
u know y?
y?
ok
so
lets say u have a line
like that i showed u
ok
like this
is 360 degree right
and lets say
there is a line
that travels through
so the lines
make a point in the middle
and that creat 4 angles
yessa
okayy
and 3+4 also = 180
yess
yess
so angle 1 = angle 3
becuz
1+3+2+4 = 360
ok wait
i need a better to explian
im bad at explain
wait wait wait
ok
okay
ok sorry
wait imma pic the actual lecture
i think its just one of those thing in math like 1+1=2 its just defined like that u cant change it
like natural
There are statements and reasons and i need to prove something
based on the given and illustration
Btw thank you it really helpedd me alott
oh ok
How do i solve this
You wanna find all the inside angles of the triangle, then you can find "?"
- Find e and d
- Find c
- Find b
- Find a
- Find (?)
Things to remember : supplementary angles, vertically opposite angles, and angles in a triangle.
d is 30
e is 25
c is 125
b is also 125
a is 30
so ? is 150
@rustic cairn
Thank you
No clue how to do today's math problem from my calendar. It goes:
The smallest n such that a regular n-gon cannot be constructed with a straightedge and compass.
I don't know how you'd find that with a pencil and paper, lol
Galois theory covers this idea, and shows which n-gons aren't constructible with algebra
How would I find D. My latest step was to find slope MB
It's (2,8)
π
there we go
Seems fine
well atleast it works now Thanks π
Cool, tag me if any issue comes up
Okidoki π
Also, you might get your question answered sooner in #βhow-to-get-help
rather than here
oO ook ill delete the question here and go over there
Good luck π»
π
<@&286206848099549185>
oh nice, this is fun
What's that lol
Sin[a]/A=sin[b]/B
yeah, was helping someone else
okay, so you see how AEB is a triangle, and angle E is bigger than angle A
Yea
that tells you that the segment AB is longer than the segment EB
you should have that as a theorem in your book
Whats a theorem again
I see
you only need that fact to prove this proposition -- you might want to look at the recent things you studied in the book to find that fact
The thing is i don't have a book
...
It's in my locker
I feel like you're messing with him
what no
He gave a pretty good answer
I mean the bigger the angle the bigger the line
This is something that makes intuitive sense if you have to prove it, you can look it up online
I'd just use law of sines if you've learned that
so I somehow got this right
but im not sure how to prove that (x+x)/2
would be the midpoint of h
i'm not sure what you mean by x or h, since h is the x-coordinate of the center of the circle
for this problem, you should draw the triangle
so the triangle is isosceles, right, since both the legs are the radius of the circle
an isosceles triangle is really just two right triangles put together which are congruent
there are two triangles
Yes
Well ok then
you may not be looking at the right triangles
i don't want to give you too many hints since this is a challenge problem
Ohh ok I get what your doing
I'll look at it again
Still no clue
Do I need a proportion
i'd just try to find as many lengths and angles as i could
and eventually find out the altitude of the triangle you outlined
Is this correct? Isn't the ratio tan(30)? How is he getting 1/sqrt(3)?
Oh I see... same ratio
My brain is permanently poisoned by the unit circle
Remember, to show that two polygons are similar, the angles need to be the same and the sides have to be proportional
Since you're working with rectangles, all the angles are guaranteed to be the same
So you'd just have to check the ratios to show that the triangles are similar
So say for the first one, you'd check which of the ratios 5:7, 8.5:11, and 10:14 equal each other
So uh im new to this type of high schools im from venezuela and uh i dont understand alot this
Its also my first day so yeah i would like some help I'll still grab a book from the library and take it home with me to study
An explanation works too
Im in gym rn so I'll be out around 2:30pm
Also i never learned this in my high school in venezuela, what im showing here its just something new ive seen in life.
I can see that sin is just getting shift up, but i don't know how explain it numerically
I have a more general question. I hope I am not violating any server rules due to its generality but I was wondering what you guys find the best way to create geometry intuition. I am having a hard time visualizing and remembering graphs in my head of simple equations which I think are key to having intuition on more complex equations. While I found algebra to be some sort of a logic puzzle, geometry has always been one of my problematic fields of maths.
I think trig is the least enjoyable class I have ever taken
Is there anything to make learning trig identities easier, mnemonics etc?
hmm not sure about identities although you can use unit circles to solve for a few of them if that helps
If ur talking about the 3 main trig functions do:
SOHCAHTOA
Sine
Opposite (divided by)
Hypotenuse
Cosine
Adjacent (divided by)
Hypotenuse
Tangent
Opposite (divided by)
Adjacent
in which:
opposite is the side opposite to, let's say, angle x
adjacent is the non-hypotenuse side that touches angle x
Hypotenuse is the side opposite the right angle
@twin ingot ^
by divided by I mean the length of the numerator (side) over the length of the denominator (side)
@glad ocean those ones Ive got these other ones there are 25 of them
like (A+B) = cos(A)cos(B)-sin(A)sin(B)
oh
Yeah I guess it's just a matter of memorization often
honestly lots of students just get homework to memorize that ruins the point of learning
and it certainly doesn't make me enjoy math more
mood
this is also a half semester course so we just saw them today and I have to memorize them over the weekend
rip
just no life
start with memorizing one of them
And do two at a tine
time
Then three at a time
don't proceed until you've done it perfectly
well to make it worst we havent actually learned what we are even doing with them so I can't even apply them to anything
we get to use them monday and wednesday and test friday, I guess I will get to see what its like to try and eat an elephant
sin conserves the sign
cos conserves the grouping
sin(a + b) = sin(a)cos(b) + cos(a)sin(b)
its just a lot Im overrun
Needless to say sin doesn't conserve the grouping
cos doesn't conserve the sign
thanks that did help
Do you have to know tanΒ²(x) + 1 = secΒ²(x)
I have to learn pythagorean , negative angle, difference of sin,cos, tan, double angle, half angle, and tangent half angle identities
You can get the double angle equations easily with the sum/difference equations
cos(2x)
= cos(x + x)
conserve grouping, not sign
= cos(x)cos(x) - sin(x)sin(x)
= cosΒ²(x) - sinΒ²(x)
interesting I see
haha I wish the rest of trig was that easy
what is the proper notation for the domain of Tangent, CoSecant and Secant?
I know tangent of theta can take on any value except for multiples of pie/2
1^2 π
@twin ingot
do you legit have to memorize all that (not the image, go to the link)
hey guys i need help on my homework
how am i going to solve this without a graphing calculator
its cot
the domain of tangent is all real numbers except for odd increments of pie/2
but i think co tangent is all real numbers except for increments of pie
anyone confirm?
@glad ocean You only have to memorze 2 pie/4 (root 2 over 2, root 2 over 2) and pie/6 (root 3 over 2, 1 over 2)
@glad ocean The rest of the radians are all reflections of those or in the inverse (pie / 3 is the inverse of pie /6) so (1/2, root3/2)
i really hate to solve this one without a calculator.
i can't remember the steps, period, amp
i don't get one thing at all. same to cos and sin.
this is tan and cot
i fail precalc class, gg
do you know the formula and what the parts of the formula correspond to?
like do you know what B means and C and K etc.
yeah but i don't have the memory to remember all this
y=aSink(x-b) you know each part does to the graph?
you're using tan so swap out sin for tan
well yeah. i don't even get all this useless trig
and even i barely have a hard time doing the trash unit circle
tru that. i only want to be bridge designer
LOL
and the graph here is useless craps for me
POE is the only class i enjoy
before you kill us
maybe i won't tbh. i don't have any interests
maybe not bridge designing
but now im currently designing the game with my friend.
fuck school
i want to drop out
smh
im not an expert in trig im just barely taking it. 2 Weeks in
but chegg has helped a shit ton
chegg is god
you should use it
i don't have a debit/credit card
oh dam
not everything is free
well that sucks
but yeah bridge designing is not an interest for me anymore
idk man. im not that interest into school or choosing a career
I have solved the first bit.
I need help with the equation of the horizontal bisector
What does that mean
Since the bisector is horizontal it should not have any slope, so it should only intersect the point of intersection between the two lines.The bisector will then divide the two lines in two parts to give them the same length when dropping a pependicular to the bisector line. @glad falcon
^
i love how people are like "omg wikipedia isnt trustworthy assasfdaafsd!1!!1" when the actual concern is
how unnecessarily flawed their syntax is
is it about pi = e = 3
It will be very basic, but I need help to "prove" why this parallelogram is indeed right angles across the board
I've been out of geo-trig for a long time, but my friend, who is trying to pass an exam for work, struggled with this question for 2-3 hours.
I asked him to link it to me and I was able to arrive at the answer for the last question, area CDE
with his help with formulas... of course...
Anyway, he said I "assumed" that corner D was a right angle... we had a giant debate and eventually it ended with "if you can prove why you KNOW all corners are right angles, I'll believe you"
I don't care about being right or wrong, I truly want to help him realize why and prove they are right angles, given the information on the screenshot. He is upset, I think, because he didn't arrive at this answer and I glanced at it. Lets ignore feelings and arguments and focus on "how can I truly help him pass this test" -- How do I, mathematically, prove these are right angles, without "assuming?"
I would really appreciate any help. I apologize for the wall of text, but I had to google math discords, wait 10 minutes to post and here I am... I just want to help my friend pass his test. Thank you π
its just a regular n-gon with n = 4
o
so what's the problem then ?
Is there anyway to prove this without looking at the world "rectangle" in the problem?
He is saying that I can't prove it without the word problem.
I disagree
u can try to show pythagorean theorem hold for the triangle
does it hold ?
Well sort of, right?
I was able to do p.theorm on the A to C triangle
BUT that doesn't subtract the E to A length
A to C triangle ?
Ok. I need some help understanding this @plucky marlin
I get everything and all.
but the thing that i dont understand is that why is it always TAN ?
remember sohcahtoa?
tan is opposite over adjacent
what the rise? thats the opposite side and whatβs the run? well thats the adjacent side
Oh. ya true. Never thought of that. Thanks !
@glad falcon my man Cymath π
@tranquil wigeon Ye bud ! I gotchya. π π
@wind trail There are pretty good ones here https://www.amazon.com/Trigonometry-Mathematics-Science-Books/b?ie=UTF8&node=13991
Online shopping for Trigonometry - Mathematics from a great selection at Books Store.
Books are not the only resources to learn trig. There are many great VIDS online that are very helpful.
Khan academy is all you need
lol ikr khan academy=god
I never learned anything out of khan academy
oK wEll i sTarT3d LeanrNIng ALgnegra 1 this summer and now i finished algebra 2 USING KHAN ACADMEY AFJ;ADSLFJDSKLFJ
gordon would be proud of u
could we not
how to you find an apothem?
Um Khan academy is useful excuse me?
It's just for review questions for, let's say, an exam
That you would want something else
Cause Khan academy doesn't give that many questions
Could anyone tell me the difference between cos and sin graph? Got this question wrong because of this π
A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs! Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!
@past siren
sin(x) or the red line is increasing at x = 0, and cos(x) of the blue line is decreasing at x = 0
Also @past siren did you have a graphing calculator?
that may have helped
@glad ocean I do
Not very familiar on plugging them in though. Trying to self learn trig
ah
ok I'll figure out how to do it later but remember
If you don't know how to do it, just use a calculator
a graphing calculator
@glad falcon
thank you.
wait. those are normal books
normal books π€’
π€’ π© π© π€’ π© normal books
for normies π«
Im a visual learner. I need all the flashy stuff 
Im gonna look at Khan ty
Hey folks...
so I'm a graphic designer...got me some equations I barely understand that deal with hypertrachoids...
I understand them..barely..but yeah...plug them in, I get the pretty circle pattern I want....
but then someone says, if you apply those same equations but in polar coordinates, you get them on a straight line...
now, I remember vaguely that polar coordinates is just plotting the cartesian coordinates that would give me teh circle, but instead of x,y, we're giving it in terms of radians & angles...
I think...
where am I best starting out trying to brush up on my maths here...
(probably not articuting this very well)
how you think I feel? I'm 35. Hacen't done any real maths since i was 16

Polar coordinates are (r,theta)
where r is the length of the line, and theta is the angle to the positive x-axis
polar coords are typically not taught alongside trig
Khan Academy probably has the basics you want @opaque folio but hypertrachoids are probably something you'll need to dig around for explicitly, I found a formula but its pretty darn ugly even in polar form
thanks...I've just about gotten to grips with the formula in cartesian form...
(I have a script open in adobe illustrator that draws it for me)
but transposing it to a polar form eludes me presently...
x = r cos(theta), and y = r sin(theta)
then a lot of
fiddling
to see if it simplifies nicely
Some stuff gets really nice in polar form
Other stuff π€’
well this is for guilloches;
they look very pretty, hence my interest...I know that they turn from a rosette to, well, basically a sin wave when expressed in polar
I've literally just worked out how the script (written by someone else) us using the actual equation...
Don't most programmers just hijack other peoples code lmfao
i certainly do lol
I'm not really a programmer...I'm a designer, but there is literally nothing on the market that does what I'm wanting that costs less than $1000
@opaque folio I can code for ya. For free
yea software is pricey, esp specialist stuff
-2+cos(4pix) https://www.desmos.com/calculator/3mqdzddv6o
can someone explain how I interpret what is happening to the amplitude? I know cos should normally be at 1 and the way i want to read this is its 1 shifted up 2 and reflected down, but thats not whats happening
Amplitude is unchanged for this graph

in the Function F(x)= -4 Sin 2 ( X + Pi/2)
do i distribute the 2 into the X and Pi/2 ?
so it becomes 0 < 2X < 2(Pi/2)
wait nvm 0 < (2X+ Pi) < 2Pi
first one
its the last one i posted
cause look here https://www.desmos.com/calculator/dwu2i16kme
0 < (2x + Pi) < 2Pi you subtract pi from all 3 sides -Pi < 2X < Pi then divide everything by 2 and -Pi/2 < X < Pi/2
given -Pi/2 < X < Pi/2 the Period should be Pi and the spacing should be every Pie/4
@upper karma use the cosine rule after working out the angle A
or pythagoras twice
How would I work out |AC| though?
This problem is melting my brain lol, I suck at math
I guess these guys donβt answer very simple problems
,calc sqrt(63)/2
Result:
3.9686269665969
so you get 27-ish ?
Was that the correct answer?
i get sqrt(63)/2
I did not write that. My older cousin attempted it. Could you help me formulate solid proof of a correct answer?
so if you apply pythagoras in BCD you get BCΒ²+CDΒ² = 7Β²
in ACD you get ACΒ²+CDΒ² = 8Β², or (BC+3)Β²+CDΒ²=8Β²
two equations
two unknowns
Hmm
(and the area of BCD is just BC*CD/2)
@glad falcon very kind, and i'd take you up on that, but then I wouldn't have learned...
tho I may ping you for tips/advice
@opaque folio no worries
π
Aight socthis question is pretty easy but I don't know how to approach this
Like it could be ab the CD at the bottom
Or ac and the bd at the bottom
well, for a parallelogram, do diagonals bisect?
@glad falcon I've almost got the code doing what I want now...I have a hypertrachoid and a epitrochoid...
now it's just putting in repetition steps and working out whether I want to write a plugin for Adobe Illustrator in C++ which I don't know very well, or an extension in JavaScript...which I also don't know very well lol
@opaque folio sorry ma dude I can't help rn. I am on Android and my laptops gone to the manufacturer department
Beautiful
only help I need now is advice from seasoned Adobe plugin folks as to which route I should take
@opaque folio what are you trying to achieve?
I'm trying to build a guilloche generator inside Adobe Illustrator (I'm a graphic designer)
there's only one plugin suite to do them, and it's only sold ot governments/large design studios, for tens of thousands....there are 3 external programs that do it, but the cheapest is $500, and all 3 are shite and only run on windows, and 2 are now completely unsuported
guilloches are essentially repeated curve forms
eg the one on the left above there I just did...it's manually repeated cos I haven't coded repetition in yet...
Javascript running in Adobe Illustrator's script function
I have a JS script someone else wrote that did a simple guilloche, but only one, with limited paramters etc, and I'm slowly editing/building on it
but I am unsure if I should abandon JS and go for a full-on C++ plugin, for better IO
Idk my English not too good can someone vaguely explain what is going on in this question cause i find it wierd and something missing
Itβs the last slab on the page
the one about desert tank?
Yeah
Iβm finding it hard to follow what they are saying...due north due east? Idk
Donβt need it solved just need vague guide on what they are directing me to draw
hold on im trying to draw it!
im not that good at math but ill try and see if i can help
here you go! @zealous kiln
so basically, it says "13.5km from A to B"
so i first started with a point A
then a point B
I drew a line, 13.5km
Oh my god I need sleep
you know what true bearing is right?
i pretty much jsut googled all this and drew it
Ok thnx for making me remember directions of a compass lol
okay no problem
and because it asks for "due east"
im assuming directly east of where it was originall on A
is what you have to calculate for from Point B!
I made a huge mistake omg yeah thnx u actually cleared a lot of space in my head now
Ok so due east ok I get it
no problem!
There was but now I guess there is βno problem β
@opaque folio what parameters do you have on your epitrochoid?
erm...
hypertrachoid at the moment
tho I think I drew an epitrochoid by accident by making the radius of the secondary circle negative
it's in the javascript...
but essentially i'm drawing by using a for loop to iterate theta by a small amount
changing all the parameters manually, but I want to integrate a control to allow for discrete changing...
the equation is the hypertrachoid one
i'm trying to achieve the same design as the one you have, but it would be impossible to guess
damn looking good
I have the r set to be R/3
so it will always be one third the radius of the major
d (distance from centre of the smaller circle to the point being drawn...I'm sure there's a term for this) is set to 60
and then to make that pattern I just replicated the script 9 times, varying the major radius (R) from 60-140
Umm...please tell me I can still solve this regardless of the fact tht distance of B from the rock is missing?...
Yes.
Hmmm
Use tan function to get the height and use tan again to get the distance
But what distance do I have to work with here
I need one of B distance right?
But I only given A
Coz the perpendicular distance will be the same for both the tan functions and that gonna fetch you the distance of B
Iβm sorry I donβt know what you meant by perpendicular tan function
I visualised the two triangles but I donβt find any equal depistances betweeen them on any side of triangle
Well both the triangles gonna share a common side ? And you can use the tangent/tan of the different angles to get that value of the base of the largest triangle and then for the smaller triangle ?
But they dont have a common side
Isnβt tht a rule when I increase angle the H increase, O increase and A decrease
What's O , A or H tho ?
Hyp adjecent, opposite
We r using standard right angles that meet at the origin or in this case Group a and b
Oh umm there's a variation in the angle coz of the distance tho
Yes yes which is why the question has something missing which is distance of group b from rock
So still leaves my question if Itβs still possible to solve the uestion
Idk imma skip it
Ping me if someone knows a way to get around not having a single side of b triangle given
@zealous kiln I'm not english, what is a bearing
I only know what a Bearing 9 is
shrugs
Well just apply the similar triangle concept in triangle AFB and triangle EDM where M is the point where line AE intersects line CD.
will try, thanks!
π
Sigh...dead nvm man the questions isnβt solveable
The rock one ?
I'm with dead. It's supposed to, nothing missing. Line OP in dead's diagram is the common side you're looking for, @zealous kiln
*It's solvable, nothing missing
π·
@glad falcon hey man you around?
It's not
This identity works fine when the tangens is defined and nonzero
,wolf sin(900)/tan(900)
yeah
you get 0/0
that's because $\tan(900^\circ) = 0$
Xaositect:
:S not good enough
I'm surprised worfram does not count in radians by default
== sind(180)/tand(180)
oof right
no MathBot
but sin(180) and tan(180) are equal to 0
sorry i have a quck question
cos^2(2x)
if you expand, you get (1+cos(4x))/2
but my question:
cos(4x) = cos(2x +2x)
and so that becomes cos^2(2x) -sin^2(2x)
what am i doing wrong here?
,wolf cos^2(2x)
,wolf (1-cos(2x +2x))/2
how do you calculate the length of $\vec{AB} = 3\vec{p} - 4 \vec{q}$ where $|\vec{p}| = |\vec{q}| = 2$ ?
Autistic Hoodie:
Usually if it were $\vec{i}$ and $\vec{j}$ you would just do
Autistic Hoodie:
$|\vec{AB}| = \sqrt{3^2 + 4^2}$
Autistic Hoodie:
But I believe this doesn't apply here...
$|\vec v| = \sqrt{\vec v\cdot\vec v}$
Tuong:
Autistic Hoodie:
Autistic Hoodie:
Autistic Hoodie:
Autistic Hoodie:
I've been taught this for the length of a (x,y,z) vector...
@gritty siren Does $|\vec v| = \sqrt{\vec v\cdot\vec v}$ always apply?
Autistic Hoodie:
it's kind of a definition
the definition of the euclidean norm
(with the usual dot product)
you could work with a fancier dot product, and it would still be a norm
Autistic Hoodie:
I assume it's not but I've seen it being done like this...
yes it is
yes, and opp angs are just part of it
@astral hornet
so just for clarification
since we know the lines are all parallel
we know the angle on the other side is gonna be the same?>
bcd is composed of bce and ecd
abc and bce are linear pairs, so bce can be found
and b is opposite aec, so aec is found
using aec, ced is linear pair so that is also found
ced is isosceles so cde is found
through angle sum ecd can be found
and angle addition of bce and dec gives bcd
Que pasa
Um.
Hm.
:/
Man, that's a tough one to word out.
oof
Okay so imma guess on this explaination..
Ok so we know that For the left vertice it starts at (0,0)
yes
The top left vertice is at (a,b)
how do u know that
A and B are dummy variables
ok
Meaning we just define them as so.
kk
So we know that midline means in between (0,0) and (a,b),
yes
So it'd be ([a+0]/2,[b+0]/2)
(let me check to see if that's right, I'm a little tired)
Oh okay, so we go by the same thinking for the right side
Just instead of starting at (0,0) for the bottom, it'd be (c,d)
i know what this person did
like they did 2a, 2b on the top
that was not me @tropic shard
i dont get it but i know they put it as 2b
2a
I know how I'd explain it, but I'm not sure if they'd let you put it my way lol
19 xD
Handwriting really doesn't get better with practice xD
They're asking you for some deep stuff
Good job making it this far
hahah
What is the trick when finding the line where two planes intersect?
I know how to find the vector of the line but how do I find a point where they intersect?
$2x-y+5z-5=0 \ 7x+14y-24=0$
Autistic Hoodie:
Okay I realized it
how would i do this problem?
i'm really confused
i know how to get the center, just not the radius
xΒ²-2x+yΒ²+4y=20
(xΒ²-2x+1)+(yΒ²+4y+4)=20+1+4
(x-1)Β²+(y+2)Β²=25
5 would be the radius.
@upper karma
no
mathlyfe
u keep doing that lmao
its
(x-1)^2+(y+2)^2=25
so 5 is radius
@tropic shard
@upper karma
cuz u complete the square there but u forgot to square the term
the constant
u did +2 its +4
?
u completed the square wrong
You sure?
yes
xD
Autistic Hoodie:
prove what exactly
That if Re(w) is 0 |z| will always be 1
express z in term of w
do you have to?
should be able to reach that by setting the real part of the fraction to 0
sec^2 = 1+tan^2
is that each side simplified?
Plug it into sec
and you have tan everywhere
then u get = tan^4 - 2 - tan^2 - 1 -tan ^2
tan^4 - 2*tan^2 -3 = x
tan^2(x) = t
t^2 - 2t - 3 = 0
4 - 4 * -3 * 1 = 16
2+-4 / 2*1
t = 3 or t = -1
tan^2(x) = 3 or tan^2(x) = -1
tan^(x) = +-sqrt(3)
alright thank you so much
np
i am incredibly lost.
so all im given is acb = 40 deg, and the theorem that "two triangles drawn on the same side of a chord will have the same angles where they touch the circle"
and i'm trying to find the measure of BDC. i got 50 degrees on my first attempt, but it feels wrong. if someone could break this down, i would greatly appreciate it
50 is right 
since bca and bda intercept the same arc, the angle measures are equal
and sicne adb is inscribed in a semicircle, adc is 90
and do some angle addition and you'll find bdc to be 50 π±
if there was a triangle inside of a circle
and the points were given for the triangle in coordinates
I would have to look for the centroid right ? to get the coordinates of the midpoint ? of the circle
@astral hornet π ^ ??
I am pretty sure I am correct
the circumcenter is equidistant to the vertices of a triangle
But this is what confuses me
being equidistant, circumcenter is the center of the circle that includes the vertices of the triangle
the special property of a centroid is the 1:2 ratio
Hmm. So the I can say that the center of the circle = centroid of the Triangle ?
no. did you even read what i wrote?
Yes.
but i dont understand it
If u could make it a bit simpler it would be great thanks
Woah.
equidistant
Is the drawing of scale due to mouse drawing Or is that other line meant to be out side of the triangle
That means If I calculate the centroid of the triangle. That is not equal to the center of the circle
Ok. I think I understand
in the drawing assume the circle is a true circle, triangle vertices on circle and tick marks mean congruent
the only time centroid would be useful is for 1:2 ratios, not circumscribing
Oh.
Ok. So one more thing
Subscribe Now: http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=ehoweducation Watch More: http://www.youtube.com/ehoweducation Finding the circumcenter of...
Why does she call the Medians, " perpendicular bisector "
A perpendicular bisector is whole differnet level isnt it ?
Nice basketball.
What.
for the circle parts just find circumference of circle, then circumference if radius is decreased by 8
the rectangle its subtracting diameter from length of field
2 semi circles (or just one circle) + rectangle
@astral hornet sorry for pinging but the circle circumference would be 76pi
but how would u find the other side lengths for the rectangle
The length of the field is 60ft, the track is 8 ft, so the total height is 76 ft.
ye
r=38
ye
Diameter = 76, 136-76
Yup.
It'd be the distance between the two dots
wait
so all the sides
are the same
then?
for the smaller
the circle inside
i mean
Yeah, seems so
how much farther would someone running a lap on the outside lane travel than someone running a lap on the inside lane
Hmm.
this question is weird af
I gotta work it out, so it may take me a minute lol.
how do u get that? wait wut
wait
did u do
76pi - 60pi
don't u need the perimeter of the rectangles
@tropic shard
Nah, the horizontal distance of the rectangles are the same regardless if you're close or far from the center
It's when you're doing those curves that distance piles up.
so all u need to do is subtract the diameters
No, you'd only subtract the circumferences.
So the large circumference is 76Ο, the small one is 60Ο, 76Ο-60Ο=16Ο
drop an altitude from E on BC
y not ?
use pythagorean theorem on both triangles
wdym
Oh yea Thanks Man π
Love ya ( no homo ) π Thanks for the help @plucky marlin
np
@plucky marlin Ok what did u get for the final value
i didnt do it
oh. π¦ Ok π
,w solve (10 - x)^2 + h^2 = 64 and x^2 + h^2 = 36 and h > 0
so the area is 24/5 * 10 = 48
How would one prove that $\overline{(\frac{z_1}{z_2})} = \frac{\overline{z_1}}{\overline{z_2}}$
Autistic Hoodie:
wtf is this
@glad ocean What?
algebra 
Ok so the proof
conjugated complex number
No
Just since both at positive
Wait
I'm an idiot so forgot what the overbar means
its conjugate
maybe work with the re^(iΞΈ) form to make things easier
You mean like
Prove that
$\line{(\frac{x+iy}{a+ib})} = \frac{\line{x+iy}}{\line{a+ib}}$
Autistic Hoodie:
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for details. (You may edit your message)
Extend it'
Sot aht it looks the same
I think that would work yeah
Cool
$(z-\frac{1}{2})^4 = (1+i\sqrt{3})^6$
Autistic Hoodie:
What is the simplest way to solve this?
Hmm
Yes.
Autistic Hoodie:
Since the right side does not have an imaginary unit
The equation is actually
$(x-1/2)^4 = 64$
Autistic Hoodie:
If we get the 4th root of every side
Hmm
We get
$(x-1/2) = 2\sqrt{2} \ (x-1/2) = -2\sqrt{2} \ -(x-1/2) = 2\sqrt{2} \ -(x-1/2) = -2\sqrt{2}$
Autistic Hoodie:
Autistic Hoodie:
$64^{1/4}=2\sqrt 2$
Tuong:
Hmm
How do I solve it then
I believe I am correct till the part
$(x-\frac{1}{2})^4 = 64$
Autistic Hoodie:
but the set of fourth roots of 64 is\
${2\sqrt2, i2\sqrt 2,-2\sqrt 2,-i2\sqrt2} $
Tuong:
I don't understand that
If we are talking about complex numbers than that applies?
$_(x-1/2+iy)^{4} = 2^6 \ (x-1/2+iy) = 2^{3/2} / <=> x-1/2 = 2^{3/2}$
DEAD.:



