#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 184 of 1
since they're congruent, x^2 - 10 = 5x + 4
solve for x
then use pythagoras theorem in any one of those to find the height
then area is 1/2 * 15 * height
times 2
thanks
np
If no one offers help in 5 minutes, feel free to PM me
@latent canopy still need help?
yhea
Looks like a problem that I solved from a math competition.
I will have the solution within 30 minutes if that not too late.
Oh wait, nvm. I can find the small circle radius if I were given the distance between the bottom centers of circle A and B.
Then I would be able to solve it using systems of equations when connecting the radii to the centers of B to smaller circle and centers of A to smaller circle.
@latent canopy You might want to give people that super helpful link you showed me yesterday
Label the points of tangency. Find the relation between each point of tangency (will involve each radius), and create the general formula.
@limpid basin ik it was a few days ago but what did u mean by law of cosines?
or about the question i asked in general
@gilded needle
Doesn't seem like enough info
You're still missing an important part. I see now that you are breaking a vector into its components, and whenever you do that, the angle opposite the original vector is 90°
As such
Gy = 9.81cos(55)
Gx = 9.81sin(55)
This is a general pattern. Whenever you break a vector into its components:
The opposite side is hsin(θ)
The adjacent is hcos(θ)
EDC is a right angle, so that should help you solve for x
DE bisects AC so AD = DC = AC/2
Guys, quick question. What regular prism has the best V:SA ratio?
icosahedron?
@surreal cipher
icosahedron has lowest SA : V ratio so therefore it must have highest V: SA ratio
What is the area of an iscosceles triangle with a hypotenus of 20cm?
Do you mean like this?
@rain tulip
This is my problem.
I need a regular polygon to use as a face for a prism that extends 22 feet. What regular polygon is the best face choice?
Yeah $$\sqrt{2x^{2}}=\sqrt{2}x$$ and not 2x
Yus
thanks
inverse tangent is defined as:
Kylixir:
is there a way to define a variation of arctan such that
Kylixir:
Or should I just define my own function as
Kylixir:
If you really need it I would say define your own function
It's somewhat unusual tho
$arctan(\frac{Qx}{P})$
Kylixir:
Looks like I don't need to make my own function after all
why is using arctan((-8) / 2) followed by adding 360 not the correct answer?
i'm confused over this
One significant digit after the decimal point
no, the problem is that the correct answer is 436.0
Like 284.1 (or whatever)
the german part at the bottom states: "the right answer is 436.0"
Well, that can never be right for degrees. And I don't know of another unit that goes that high. Even gradians only go to 400
Sure
Can someone help me with this? My teacher didn't explain it at all
Sorry about that white thing, it's my dogs tail
This is pretty much vertical and corresponding angles stuff. Unfortunately, the whole picture is a bit fuzzy. If no one else offers to help in 5 minutes, feel free to PM me
Better. Remember vertical angles or PM me if no one else helps
because 2sinx(1-sin^2x) expands to 2sinx - 2sin^3x
First let $$x = (1 + i \tan\theta)^n + (1- i\tan\theta)^n$$. Notice that multiplying x by $$\cos^n\theta$$ yields $$x(\cos^n\theta) = (\cos\theta + i\sin\theta)^n + (\cos\theta - i\sin\theta)^n$$
Plum:

I'm still a bit confused
About what
I've been stuck on this problem for the past hour, I feel like the solution is literally in my face but I can't see it.
Could someone give me a little help?
😃
Seems like it
Hey guys, I'm a little confused about trig on the Cartesian plane. When calculating theta, it's always between the x axis and the hypotenuse right? But in my book it says something about "180-theta" when it's in the second quadrant. What does that mean / when do you use it?
Could you take a picture @peak talon ?
Uhh my phones camera is broken but I'll try find an example online and screenshot
Alright
And by calculating theta, I presume it is to solve for the possible values of theta given that some trigonometric function, when applied to theta, equals <insert arbitrary ratio>.
AH yes
It's just confusing when to use theta and when to use 180-theta or whatever
Alright
The 180 - theta stuff
is to calculate for something known as the "basic angle"
do you know what the basic angle is?
Nope
Yea
Try putting in tan(135 degrees)
-1
Yeah
Now try tan(45)
1
What is common between the 2 values?
In other words, the have the same magnitude
The basic angle is the acute angle that when put through the same trigonometric function, will spit out a value of the same magnitude as the theta.
So it's like the interior angle?
Not quite
Cause what confuses me is that like in my book there's an example thats a triangle in the second quadrant and theta goes from the x axis to the hypotenuse and it says theta is between 90 and 180 but then when you work out theta with shift sin or whatever it returns something like 22 degrees
It basically means the value of your inverse sin (arcsine) will only give you an angle between 90 degrees and -90 degrees.
pi/2 to -pi/2 in radians
?
Okay I don't wanna get too ahead 😂 I just wanna know, why does it say theta is between 90 and 180 but then when you work out theta it's 22 in my example? When you work out that are you working out the interior angle so to get the whole angle it's 180 - 22?
Why is this so confusing to me ffs
Okay so the question sentence is: if 13sinTheta - 5 = 0, and then some questions
And in the beginning it says "Theta E[90, 180]"
The sever owner has disabled that command in this location.
Yeah I know it's in the second quadrant. But what confuses me is that in the drawing it says theta goes from x axis to hypotenuse. But then if you work it out its 22👀
Yea it is
Shift sin
I sin^-1 both sides
Which gave 22 or something degrees
How does that work?
You've just hit the nail, that's what confuses me
Why does the exterior angle (theta) have the same ratios as the interior one?
So when you're working with sides you use theta but if they ask you for the size of theta then you work out the angle using shift whatever and then - 180 or however much you need to get it?
Yeah that's what I meant
But for the second quadrant it's 180 -
In the example theta goes from the x axis to the hypotenuse
I wish my phones camera worked so I could show
It just confuses me how theta is clearly more than 90 degrees in the drawing but when you work it out its "Theta = 22"
'
basic angle also known as reference angle
since the triangles are just reflections, the basic angles are equal
In this case, the arcsine will give you alpha (basic angle), so you have to use that to find theta
since theta was specified in the question to be in the second quadrant.
If the question gave another range
😃
for example
0 <= theta <= 360
then you would have to give both arcsine(theta) and 180 - arcsine(theta) as answers. Since both are possible values
So I can't go from "sinTheta = 5/13" to "Theta = sin^-1 * 5/13" cause that doesn't give theta it gives the basic angle?
kek
if a question asked that
I would give the general forms for theta
(arcsine(theta) + 360n) and (180 - arcsine(theta) + 360)
n E z
yea
you're right
we have to use Tau Radians
hueheuheuhue
omar23:
which problem?
i have a few way to simplify but i dont know what i should do next
sin^4x-cos^4x+cos^2x
1-cos^2x+1-cos^2x-cos^4x+cos^2x is this how you simplify or do you make everything to sin?
I guess thats fine for simplifying
sin(x)^4 + sin(x)^2
2sin(x)^4 - cos(x)^4 + cos(x)^2 = 2sin(x)^4 - cos(x)^2 * (cos(x)^2 - 1)
cos(x)^2 = 1 - sin(x)^2
cos(x)^2 - 1 = -sin(x)^2
sub it in
no, the sin^4(x) cancels out
you forgot the 2
problem 2 then
bit confused
anyway
sin^4(x) - cos^4(x) + cos^2(x) = sin^4(x) - (1 - 2sin^2(x) + sin^4(x)) + cos^2(x)
when you bring a binomial to a power
you cant distribute the power
have you learned foil?
sin(x)^2 + cos(x)^2 = 1, not subtract
it wouldnt be 1 either way
Oo trig identities
no, make everything to sin
whats the identies for cos to sin
Wats the prolem
cos(x)^2 = 1 - sin(x)^2
=tex cos^2 x = 1 - sin^2 x
The sever owner has disabled that command in this location.
fishcat:
Lol
well, you know that $cos^2 x + sin^2 x = 1$
fishcat:
yes
subtract sin^2 on both sides
so its same thing than
yep
correct
The answer is sinx^2
that opens the door to next equation
yes that whats the practice exam answer says
thank you everyone!
let me get this straight
sin^4x-cos^4x+cos^2
sin^4x-cos^4x+1-sin^2?
yes
hm....
you can just use difference of squares for the first two terms
$\sin^4x - \cos^4x = (\sin^2x)^2 - (\cos^2x)^2\(\sin^2x + \cos^2x)(\sin^2x - \cos^2x)$
$$\sin^4x - \cos^4x = (\sin^2x)^2 - (\cos^2x)^2$$$$(\sin^2x + \cos^2x)(\sin^2x - \cos^2x)$$
june:
which part doesnt make sense to you?
bc i think its right
let me get mic
lol its ok
so do i foil that [1-sin^2x]^2
Yes.
if you foil than is it going to be
[1-sin^2x] x [1-sin^2x]?
or [1-sin^2x] x [1+sin^2x]
The same sign,
The second line you wrote was the conjugate of [1-sin²(x)] which is something else entirely
So you'd have to do [1-sin²(x)]·[1-sin²(x)] to get,
I'll let you do the honors
1-2sinx^2+sinx^4?
(a+b)²=a²+2ab+b²
Yes,
So I'd reorder it to sin⁴(x)-2·sin²(x)+1, then plug that in to the original problem for cos⁴(x)
let me re-order or write it one moment
tell me if i wrote this wrong
sin^4x-sin^2x+sin^4x
Shouldn't be two sin⁴(x)'s
Oh I see
But you plugged in the thing we did for cos⁴(x),
You also need to distribute the negative to all those terms
So you'd have one positive sin⁴(x), and one negative sin⁴(x), and so on.
frustrated right now
i understand till
sin^4x-[cos^2x]^2+1-sin^2x
after we foil
Sin^4x-2sin^2x+sin^4x
what am i misssing?
Okay, write for me what we had for cos⁴(x)=?
We got it so that cos⁴(x)=sin⁴(x)-2sin²(x)+1, or no?
i got it @tropic shard
Nice
I got lost on the second line of #2, but I agree with your final answer, good job!
@meager acorn its 1-(cos(x))^2 = sin(x)^2, not 1-cosx = sinx
i wanna say square both sides but then you'd get extraneous solutions
i dont think im comfortable enough with my trig identities to help you solve it, i can only point out the mistakes i see
sinx/cosx=1-1/cosx
sinx/cosx+1/cosx=1
secx(sinx+1)=1
sinx+1=cosx
Uhh lemme refine that
sinx+1 is not equal to cos x
whats it solving for
When tan(x)=1-sec(x)
xD
i thought it was just stating the identity tan(x)=sec(x)-1
It threw me off too, until I realized halfway.
i always get the order mixed lol
Could you translate what I said to Tex? My Unicode way makes it look too messy with Paratheses and Brackets.
fishcat:
$\frac{\sin x}{\cos x}+\frac{1}{\cos x}=1$
fishcat:
$\sec x (\sin x + 1)=1$
fishcat:
fishcat:
Alrighty thanks!
Y'know if there's a way to make it more obvious the answer would be 0∧π?
fishcat:
$(\sin x + 1)^2 = 1-\sin^2 x$
fishcat:
$\sin^2 x + 2 \sin x + 1 = 1 - \sin^2 x$
fishcat:
one sec
i deleted it for nothing
Yup we're doing that xD
😮
professional $
$\tan^2 x = (1-\sec x)^2$
fishcat:
fishcat:
subtract sec^2 on both sides
Lost me there
$-2 = - 2 \sec x$
fishcat:
Nope
its true at 0 and pi
It's right
oh that's odd...
Yeah.. That's wrong somewhere..
Are we sure tan²(x)=sec²(x)-1?
I believe that is..
Yeah, everything checks out..
theres no intersection between the two initial equations at pi
Take sin²(x) + cos²(x) = 1
Divide both sides by cos²(x)
tan²(x) + 1 = sec²(x)
So that's the right identity
Now I have to see my earlier one as to why I was wrong, smh.
So the answer would be x=arccos(1)?
yup
So I was right??
well you were right about 0
i dont know how you got pi in there
it seemed right to me
Oh, cause I'm dumb for thinking cos(π)=1?
When is sec(x) = 1?
0, 2π, 4π...
So that's a yes.
And negative
the interval was [0,2pi)
So 0 is the only answer they want
0 and 2π
i m so screwed next week test;;;
But did they take 2π for you Yup?
i dont think so
Idk why I saw that paratheses as a bracket, sorry..
sum to product
only i see is
sin a+sinb
sin a - sin b
cos a + cos b
cos a - cos b
which one do i need to use
i want to punch a wall beacuse frustration
Well sin(x+π/2)=cos(x)
12·sin(x)+16·sin(x+½·π)
Hm.. Now how to deal with the coefficients.
12·sin(x)+12·sin(x+½·π)+4·sin(x+½·π)
24·sin(2x+½·π)·cos(2x+½·π)+4·sin(x+½·π)
Ahh I thought I was unto something, sorry man.
<@&286206848099549185>
@umbral snow
i understand i have to use sum to product
but which formulas i have to use
there's some different formula's
do you want to like derive them or just get hit with them
this is pre-calc
Start with the form you want:
Asin(x + θ)
= Asin(x)cos(θ) + Acos(x)sin(θ)
This shows you that
Acosθ = 12
Asinθ = 16
i dont know derive
derive != derivative
it means to show where they originate from
so take something you know, and turn it into the formula
im guessing that's what kaynex is gonna do so
ill step out
So you want to solve for both of those. Any guesses?
If you only want θ, then just divide bottom by top:
tanθ = 16/12
A divides out, and θ is findable
how did you or where did tan theta = 16/12 come from
Start with the form you want:
Asin(x + θ)
= Asin(x)cos(θ) + Acos(x)sin(θ)
This shows you that
Acosθ = 12
Asinθ = 16
Dividing one line by the other:
(Asinθ) / (Acosθ) = 16/12
tanθ = 16/12
where did = Asin(x)cos(θ) + Acos(x)sin(θ)
come from
I expanded Asin(x + θ)
Using a sum identity
I've never used a product identity for anything before, lel. Sums are worth remembering though
I could have divided the other way I guess? Got cotθ = 12/16
Do you understand how we got to
Acosθ = 12
Asinθ = 16
Compare the form we WANT, vs the form we HAVE
WANT: Acosθsin(x) + Asinθcos(x)
HAVE: 12sin(x) + 16cos(x)
12sin x = A
16sin x = theta?
We can make those two things the same, if
Acosθ = 12
Asinθ = 16
So let them be the same thing
Note we have no control over x, and can't freely set that.
atan(4/3) = 0.927295218001612
In radians. Maybe you want degrees?
== atand(16/12)
180×atan(4/3)/π = 53.130102354156
tanθ = 16/12
θ = tan¯¹(16/12)
Or θ = arctan(16/12), since you are comfortable with the notation
Np. Feel free to ask if you have anything else!
🆙 | Yupki has given @umbral snow a reputation point!
Yay.
?
where do i start
So this is without a calculator?
yep
Okay well we know 165° is 15° from 180
i would go for 210 - 45
can we use 165 is 15
So sin(165°)/cos(165°)=sin(15°)/-cos(15°)
why -cos 15
Imagine the unit circle, if it passed the 90° point, the x-value is negative
But the y-value is still positive, because the angle is less than 180°
heya
Ive got a homework sheet i dont fully understand
Would anyone help me complete it?
yep
Here would be nice, so I can help too >:)
Wait, so you don't know about translation via vectors?
Not really
I just find it so hard to make it accurate
And so I end up getting it wrong
I'm rusty, but I believe the -7 on top means move a point to the left by 7, and the -2 means move that same point down 2
Do that for all 4 points, then connect the dots and label 'B'
Right
Have you done that already?
Alright, now focusing back on image 'A'
Rotate your shape A 180 degrees about (1,0) and label the image C
Is that the one on the bottom or left?
Very bottom.
yup
So that means that will be stationary throughout the rotation.
The other points will move the 180°, but in this case that simply means their y-value changes sign.
So for ex. move a point from (2,2) to (2,-2) in this case.
So where do i move the bottom one to?
The one at (1,0) stays in place.
The point at (2,2) goes to (0,-2)
i think ive got it
Just imagine rotating that shape to the other side, while holding the (0,1) point down with your thumb.
lemme check with you in a sec ill snap a pic when finished
Ye
That looks right.
great
Yea, you're good.
Reflect A in line M label the image D
So since it's like a secondary y-axis
since it goes up and down
The Y values will stay the same
So it stays as -2 for the Y?
Well I believe they want you to focus back on image 'A,' where none of the points are -2
so (1,0) will still be ( ,0) in the end
Dont forget line M
wait um
If you look up theres that bold line
So pick a point, any point
Bottom one
So technically the boxes are ½, so it'd be -3 but you get it
The teacher says either or
Now, continue going that same direction the same amount of boxes you counted
You can use 1/2 or 1
Im using halfs because its easier to count, for me anyways
so another -6?
-12?
That's okay for these purposes, just make sure to stay consistent
Yea
So it'd be -12 away from it's original position
Place the dot
done
Yes
Then another -4?
Yeap
done
finished it
yeah
ty
ok
next is enlargement
Enlarge by sf 2 at point X
Centred at the point x*
Reflect in line M and Rotate 90* clockwise at the point x
Oh so for enlargement,
So basically count the dots x and y values from the X and double it
It's scaled in reference to reference point X, yes.
So like that for each point
(the lines are to be erased, leaving behind only the dot.
shouldn't it be more like
yes, yes it should
I was still scaling it by 2, mb
But same concept
Well
You see how horizontally you go to the right 2 squares?
Then go down by that amount.
^
For each point it'd be different. Hopefully this picture could be worth a thousand words
the blue line is the horizontal distance
but what do i do to work it out
then the red line is that same distance downwarss
How do i know where to move it
Either way works
You can do all of them Horizontal to Vertical, or Vertical to Horizontal, you'll get the same result
That's Vertical to Horizontal, but again, no need to do both Vert. to Hori. and Hori. to Vert. for the same point.
(but it's a good technique to check your work)
Ok im going to restart it and draw in the lines
brb
failed miserably
wait
got it
I dont think it is meant to go over the line tho?
lol
What do you mean?
The top left of my shape goes over the line
Let's see
Almost,
That one I use imagination, lol.
X is your center of rotation.
So i rotate off that and not around the shape?
Yep
Could someone draw how that would look? I just want to make sure im right
so would i draw the bottom 4 squares onto the x position?
The point right below x would be just to the left of it after the rotation
left of what?
Of x
I drew mine, show me how yours looks 
im still working it out
hold up
I’d rule over it but it’s gonna get rubbed out Ik it xd
The distance from x to the closest point on the triangle should not change, as it's rotation.
ohhh
Clockwise, not counterclockwise castle
Oh
I didn't read that part, I just read 90°, so I was thinking like the unit circle xD
It happens to the best of us 👍
I thought the same thing at first as well lol
Check all vertices of the triangle.
wait
Make sure the angle subtended by the arc from initial to final is 90 degrees.
did i do it backwards?
Not quite there yet, you seem to have 2 points correct.
Is it backwards?
Not really
Whats to correct? I dont get where i went wrong
That top-most point needs to be below the horizontal line
Think of the rotation in your head
Directly below the leftmost vertex
To better visualize it, take your paper, hold your finger on x, and spin the paper 90 degrees
Such that the top of the paper is facing to the right
Yea, just don't lose your original position lol.
(have it visualized the whole time)
@serene field Sorry about that random FR, I won't feel bad if you declined that xD
A hint: Check the right-most vertex of the original.
Let's see
I dont think thats right tho
rip
You see Jythro's rotation?
You did, but it was misplaced.
Try imagining the triangle were a flag of sorts attached to X
And you were moving the flag around X
Literally take your paper, hold the tip of your pencil on X, and rotate your paper such that the top of the paper faces 3 o'clock
See where the original triangle moves to relative to it's original position
Stop and do exactly what I said, then take a picture of what you see
Rotation should not change the distance between points to the axis of rotation.
i feel so incredibly dumb rn
For example, if you were to paint a dot on a car tire
And you were to spin the tire 90 degrees
The distance to that dot from the axis of rotation, the center, is still the same.
In rotations, the points must reserve the same distance away from the point of rotation.
What you need to do is stop and take a step back
Literally take the time to rotate something irl
Get a piece of cheese from your fridge, cut it into a triangle shape
And spin it around
*a triangle piece of paper works too.
or just cut out something the same shape
and put it on the figire
add a circle to it
Lol
radius is 1 gridline
Yes
👍
That's it
Finallyyyy
Do you see why?
take the point closest to X
Gotcha
uhh ok
now, move the point 90° while still keeping the distance of 1 gridline
How’s this so far?
Yeah i get what you mean big
Thanks for the help on a quick note
Means so much
A is transformed to B by a [ ] through [ ]
Yeah, that'd be right. It's one in both the x and y directions.
A to C looks right as well.
Is it a vector I’m looking for on the 2nd part of B?
Not the grammar of the prompting sentence tho lol (ignore this, side comment)
That first sentence threw me way off lmao
Doesn't sound right, but it works
What do you need to do to A to get it to B?
Try looking at one vertex of A and its corresponding vertex in B.
D is a reflection of A draw the mirror line to reflect the diagram
Think of it as a mirror line.
👍
its dilation
or scaling
whatever you want to call it
ok to find it
take any line in the smaller figure
and take the corresponding line in the larger figure
For B?
yeah
Is it by sf 2?
yeah
C now
so keep the basic figure of c in your head
now rotate figure a
actually nevermind
it's reflection
yeah
What way does it face?
Could be answered as reflection or rotation + reflection 🤔
Try imagining a mirror between A and C
the closest point to each other is the right angle
It's diagonal, yeah, but that does look slightly off
yep
Your professor might dock points if they're stingy
it should be directly in between the 2 right angle points
Reflection (Mirrored line drawn above)?
Ill redraw
done
I’ve done the next part, and semi completed the part after
Then just geometric reasoning after
Ok
x = -2 for all y
on the opposite axis
Likewise, y = 1 for all x
take point -2 on the x axis
yeah
now draw a line perpendicular to the black line
connecting x -2 and the dges
yea
The horizontal line is y = 0.
wait
Once you redraw it, you may want to extend it to the right.
yeah that should be
extend what to the right?
The line supposedly extends infinitely in both directions
You'll be reflecting the image, which will likely end up on the right
Reflect the triangle across the axes
Remember that the distance from the original's vertices and the mirror is the same as the distance from the mirror to the image's vertices.
so to the right of the line?
yes
ok
you just have to reflect all 3 points
then you can construct the triangle from there
Slightly off the bottom, but my teacher isn’t picky
I’ll redraw the bottom anyways
Ok so now do the same thing underneath the X axis?
perfect except you have to reflect the image
actually
the mirror is not placed correctly
The second mirror is still along y = 0
^
So I’m just redrawing it again?
Extend it to the right
extend the mirror
yeah
reflect the image
was i doing it right before?
yeah


