#geometry-and-trigonometry

1 messages ยท Page 171 of 1

steady sky
#

right?

keen pilot
#

2*(r^2)*pi is wrong

#

You need to rotate it by r^2*pi

robust rampart
#

can anyone help me with geometry?

waxen gorge
#

HALLO

#

OKAI

robust rampart
#

hi

waxen gorge
#

WATCHU WANT

robust rampart
#

so here

#

If triangle MAP is congruent to triangle FUN and the measure of angle M is 90 degrees and the measure of angle P is 40 degrees what is the measure of angle U?

waxen gorge
#

Ok

#

one is 90

#

One is 40

#

What's 90+40

#

130

#

180-130 = 50ยฐ

robust rampart
#

a. 50 b. 90 c. 40 d. 140 e. cant tell

waxen gorge
#

U know two angle measurement s

#

So u do 180-them added to get hte third

robust rampart
#

so A right?

waxen gorge
#

Yes

robust rampart
#

next one

waxen gorge
#

Ask someone else brb

robust rampart
#

ok

wide path
#

Hello...

#

Anybody

#

Hello

chrome fiber
#

What is it?

analog dust
#

This is #germoertyr

#

Anyone has geomerty problems for me?

#

4 mee

#

Pleaz

mint sandal
#

@analog dust problem [045]

analog dust
#

Whats the deifference between R and R^2...

mint sandal
#

R is the real number line

#

R^2 is the euclidean plane

analog dust
#

Oh

#

Why not just say in a plane

mint sandal
#

same thing

wide path
#

This is sad

#

Rip geometry

#

I swear how is it that bad its the easiest one!

#

The formulas are easy

#

It may look hard with all the "PIr2+(b1,+b2)

wide path
#

Ps

#

They need a trigonometry section

knotty shell
#

Can someone explain to me why the distance from P to -q is r+d and the distance to +q = r-d

#

It seems so simple but can't figure it out.

shadow anvil
#

@knotty shell Still stuck?

knotty shell
#

Yeah kinda

shadow anvil
#

kinda

knotty shell
#

Can you help me out? thonker

shadow anvil
#

What does kinda mean

#

Does that mean you've part way got it

knotty shell
#

Not really

shadow anvil
#

ok

#

Well

#

I'm not sure if there's anymore complications to it

#

But it looks like r is being treated like a vector

#

So if you choose your positive direction

#

which is left

#

You've got r

#

Which is all positive in left direction

#

and then you're going d in the left direction

#

So there's no negatives

#

but the other direction

#

you're going forwards by negative d (backwards)

knotty shell
#

Yeah

shadow anvil
#

That's why it's negative

knotty shell
#

Yeah but I don't get why it's r+d and r-d

shadow anvil
#

because one is moving in positive d

#

the other is going backwards by d

knotty shell
#

I get the minus signs

shadow anvil
#

Oh

knotty shell
#

But why is the length -q -> P for example r+ d

shadow anvil
#

I assumed that -q and q were charges and to do with the other topics here which I'm not really familiar with

knotty shell
#

I don't see the actual geometry

#

Yeah that doesn't matter rn

shadow anvil
#

From p to -q

#

That should be -r I think

#

Because you want to go in the opposite direction

knotty shell
#

Wait what

shadow anvil
#

r

#

is labelled

#

to go the opposite direction

#

so from -q to p

knotty shell
#

But you have -q is further away from P than +q right?

shadow anvil
#

what

knotty shell
#

Isn't that right?

shadow anvil
#

Wait

#

I'm not sure what you're stating

#

-q looks closer to q than p

#

but idk if this is to scale

#

Like if it's not it depends

#

It can be, or it might not be

knotty shell
#

Yeah but t's about -q -> p and q -> p

#

not q-> -q

shadow anvil
#

Ok?

#

You're asking

#

=tex P\to -q

charred spearBOT
knotty shell
#

Yeah

#

I think it also assumes d<<r

shadow anvil
#

So from P to the point between q and -q

#

is -r

knotty shell
#

Yeah

shadow anvil
#

then +d

knotty shell
#

You can't just do that right?

shadow anvil
#

Why not

knotty shell
#

That's a vector that groes from P to the middle of -q and +q and then from there to -q

shadow anvil
#

yes

knotty shell
#

Which would be longer than the actual vector

shadow anvil
#

No

knotty shell
#

I want the distance between P and -q

shadow anvil
#

Then you find the magnitude of the resulting vector

#

I've no idea what these vectors actually are

#

But being vectors

#

You can use vector addition like that

#

Because they're not lengths

knotty shell
#

Wait really?

#

But you have to get d as a vector too right?

shadow anvil
#

Yes

#

Is d not a vector?

knotty shell
#

It is I guess

#

Okay this kinda makes sense now

#

Thanks ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

strange crow
#

um

knotty shell
#

@shadow anvil nvm I don't get it. Even if these 2 had a 90 degree angle the distance is always gonna scale with a square root since when you take the magnitude it gives you something like $$\sqrt{r^2 + d^2}$$

charred spearBOT
knotty shell
#

Which wouldn't be r+ d right?

shadow anvil
#

Well

#

It's not a distance

#

It's a vector

#

If they're distances

#

Then yes

#

You need to use some trig

knotty shell
#

Oh god

#

I see it

#

My bad haha

#

it says $$\theta =0 $$ on top

charred spearBOT
shadow anvil
#

Lmao

knotty shell
#

lol thanks anyway

#

for your time

shadow anvil
#

But it might be worthwhile trying to imagine it with another value for theta

#

Just to understand it

#

I just want to make a distinction too between vectors and vector quantities @knotty shell as I'm now realising that might have been what you meant

knotty shell
#

is a vector quantity just the magnitude?

shadow anvil
#

No

knotty shell
#

of a vector

shadow anvil
#

Newtons is a vector

#

but it's a vector quantity

#

like 5N

#

Isn't a true vector

#

It's linear a vector

#

but a true vector

knotty shell
#

I don't really kow what linear in the sense of vector means

shadow anvil
#

=tex \begin{pmatrix}a\cr b\cr c\end{pmatrix}

charred spearBOT
knotty shell
#

same for tru

#

true*

shadow anvil
#

Well

#

It's only working in one plane

#

Like 4n

#

can only go two directions

#

positive

#

and negative

#

there's no upwards

#

downwards

#

back or forwards

#

or anything like that

knotty shell
#

But when is something a true vector then?

#

When it's defined in multiple dimensions?

shadow anvil
#

Yes

#

Those vectors we need to split up into components

#

So

#

=tex \overrightarrow{Pq}=\sqrt{\left(d+r\cos\left(\theta\right)\right)^2+\left(r\sin\left(\theta\right)\right)^2}

#

fuck

knotty shell
#

This doesn't feel right

#

where's the r

shadow anvil
#

forgot it

#

whoops

#

should be one infront of sin too

charred spearBOT
shadow anvil
#

and the first pq should be |pq|

#

but w/e

#

that's the length

#

now theta equals 0

#

which works in this case

#

All I've done

#

Should be -d too

#

fml

#

=tex |\overrightarrow{Pq}|=\sqrt{\left(r\cos\left(\theta\right)-d\right)^2+\left(r\sin\left(\theta\right)\right)^2}

charred spearBOT
shadow anvil
#

Ok there we go

#

So all I've done

#

Is taken the sum of horizontal components

#

for the first part

#

the horizontal component of r is r*cos(theta)

#

Because of trig

#

soh-cah-toa

#

Then r is only existant in the horizontal plane

#

so there's no trig just minus r

#

So that's our horizontal movement from p to q

#

now the veritcal is the same principle

#

just the vertical component of r

#

using trig

#

now we just use pythagoras

knotty shell
#

And this is the distnace to +q?

#

right?

shadow anvil
#

Yes

#

-q is the same idea

#

just you will get +d instead of -d

#

because you're not going back on yourself

#

and then that will work with any value of theta

knotty shell
#

Okay thanks

upper karma
#

have fun with these guys

#

last two ones at leasat

#

I ahd fun doing them

chrome fiber
#

So easy though

upper karma
#

yeah

#

i was doing it really early

#

and got dumb

nocturne cave
#

hello, I have a question about finding the value of a trig function (sin, cos, etc.) for a given angle. I understand that a triangle is made with the given angle, but I'm not sure how to find the two other acute angles of the triangle in order to find side lengths: take the example of 330 degrees, how would I find the two other angles of the triangle from that?

mint sandal
#

look up unit circle

#

no triangle has an angle of 330 degrees

nocturne cave
#

I know that, 330 degrees is not an angle of a triangle

#

I have to find the two other acute angles of the right triangle formed from 330 degrees

mint sandal
#

how do you form a triangle from 330 degrees?

nocturne cave
#

like this

#

but this page doesn't explain it clearly

#

which is why I'm asking here

mint sandal
#

well the axes are at angles 0, 90, 180 and 270

#

330 passes the bottom axis, so one of the angles is 330-270 = 60

#

another angle is 90-60 = 30

nocturne cave
#

ahh ok so the axis in counter clock wise is what's referenced

#

thank you

fair spade
#

I got a terrifying problem. Any triangle ABC. BD bisects AC, CE bisects AB, AP is perp to BD, AQ is perp to CE. Prove PQ || BC

white harness
#

Image ?

fair spade
#

I don't have it digital

analog dust
fair spade
#

Yep, pretty much

analog dust
#

We didnt kbow where P and Q was..

#

Were

fair spade
#

not fully accurate as AQ and AP are segments

#

but close enough

analog dust
#

?

fair spade
#

AQ/AP don't intersect BC

analog dust
#

Yea its just libes

#

Lines

#

That i drew

#

Cuz why not

fair spade
#

There is also a point F where BD crosses CE

analog dust
#

Ok

fair spade
#

The only things I can easily prove is the opposing angles around F are equal and that in APFQ, angles Q and P are both 90. One needs to somehow prove angle BCQ = CQP

wide path
#

Beatifully Barely Readable

sterile stag
#

could someone pls help me w a trig problem

#

?

#

why is no one helping me? ๐Ÿ˜ข

hazy delta
#

@sterile stag where is the problem?

sterile stag
#

@hazy delta

hazy delta
#

it will help to draw a picture

sterile stag
#

It's really unclear

#

idek how to draw this

#

@hazy delta do u think u can solve this ?

hazy delta
#

i am not sure how to help, sorry

#

you must be able to draw a picture

#

if you cannot do this, it suggests a severe lack of understanding

sterile stag
#

ok thanks anyways ๐Ÿ™

keen aspen
#

Okay ill try

#

The triangle will look like that I believe

#

So I would find the law of sines to find the distance from the observer to the peg

#

and then make a triangle with that to find the horizontal distance

#

@sterile stag

sterile stag
#

Ok I'll try that

#

@keen aspen

keen aspen
#

No that is wrong

#

You did the second part right

#

but you didn't use the law of sines correct

#

$$\frac{\sin(51)}{20}=\frac{\sin(57)}{x}$$

#

?

charred spearBOT
sterile stag
#

where did u get 51 and 57 from

keen aspen
#

add 41+10

#

to get that whole angle

#

and then 180-51-72

#

to get the 3rd angle

sterile stag
#

ohhhh i see

#

I GOT IT

#

THANK YOU SO MUCHHHH @keen aspen

keen aspen
#

No problem

#

I am doing the same stuff in my trig class :v

#

Applications using oblique triangles

past mantle
#

I'm about to get into probability

#

In geometry

keen aspen
#

probability in geometry thonker

upper karma
#

^

upper karma
#

could I theoretically learn geometry using Euclid's Elements

upper karma
#

That would be pointlessly difficult

upper karma
#

@upper karma pointlessly difficult is my middle name

#

Its not productive either

#

Its a slow way of learning

#

yeah I have all summer

#

You wont get a better understanding if geometry by reading frok euclid

#

Dont get that impression

#

Its way faster and easier to learn from other sources

#

And

#

Other texts will give a perspective euclid didnt have

#

@upper karma I also am gonna get another book just a bit after

#

Fine

#

but Euclids elements used to be the number 2 most printed book ever next to the bible

#

like

#

it was what people learned from for over two thousand years

dreamy meteor
#

people two thousand years ago bled themselves to death to cure disease

bronze harbor
shadow anvil
#

@bronze harbor still stuck?

bronze harbor
#

nah i got it lol

waxen gorge
#

I mean u can obviously make a bunch of triangles and stuff but I need a fast way :(

#

Jk that's the wrong question

#

Here

blissful temple
#

Okay Iโ€™m gonna try this at home after dinner XD

sturdy bolt
#

@waxen gorge I'm not really familiar with these types of problems, so maybe there is another way, but I drew these lines:

#

The first step is to calculate that $$CF = \sqrt{r^2-1} + \sqrt{3}$$

charred spearBOT
sturdy bolt
#

Then, using the fact that $$GE = DE/2$$, calculate that $$CF = DE \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} + \sqrt{r^2 - DE^2/4}$$

charred spearBOT
sturdy bolt
#

Then set those two expressions equal to each other and solve for DE

#

This gives a formula that matches one of the multiple choice options you showed earlier

#

Sorry my labels don't match yours

sturdy bolt
cyan saffron
#

Out of curiosity, when is a class of this type of geometry taught? Highschool? I'm doing calc 3 and I still haven't seen geometry of this complexity.

white swift
#

depends on the classes you take

#

you can have geometry anywhere from grade 5 to 12 to uni etc

sturdy bolt
#

None of my gradeschool geometry or trigonometry classes had problems as complex as the one above. I didn't learn that kind of geometry in a class, really. Usually people learn it separately, by studying the problems from mathematics contests and their solutions. @cyan saffron

#

Some universities have problem solving clubs which do exactly that.

analog dust
#

I think there must be an elegant solution to the problem..

sturdy bolt
#

The one on AoPS is pretty elegant @analog dust

analog dust
#

I wanna solve it myself so plz no spoil

#

Ill check it out after

sturdy bolt
#

cool

waxen gorge
#

@analog dust check it out already >_>

#

I tried the formula for the solution and plugged it in with the given values in the question and it said the answer was wrong

sturdy bolt
#

iirc the answer I got was sqrt(7)/2, is that what you got?

#

@waxen gorge

waxen gorge
#

Yes

#

Sometimes he messes up the answers

#

He'll probably notice and fix it during the class

sturdy bolt
#

Where are you stuck and what have you tried so far?

upper karma
#

could someone please help in #help-3

waxen gorge
#

@upper karma did u get it already

#

I'm assuming it was already due uwu

#

BTW U SHOWED UR TEACHER AGAIN UGH HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO TELL U

#

@ebon vapor can u delete the plebs image

upper karma
#

yo

#

i took the test

#

i think i did well

#

so im g

#

thanks tho

waxen gorge
#

Lol

#

Ur pfp is just slightly making me cringe

upper karma
#

Heyyo.

upper sedge
#

Question?

upper karma
#

Not really.

#

I just have a geometry class in high school.

brittle kraken
#

Can someone help me with #89?

#

B is the correct answer, but I need to learn how to solve it because my teacher expects me to show her solutions. I got that question wrong and I had to re-do it.

lavish haven
#

@brittle kraken

prisma gorge
#

Another useful identity is the law of sines: for any triangle with angle measures a, b, and c, with sides of length A, B, and C, where side A is opposite vertex a, side B is opposite vertex B, and side C is opposite vertex c, it can be said that:

#

$$\frac{sin(a)}{A} = \frac{sin(b)}{B} = \frac{sin(c)}{C}$$

charred spearBOT
prisma gorge
#

So $$\frac{sin(52)}{(the length not in the picture that i'm not gonna figure out)} = \frac{sin(x)}{6.6cm}$$

charred spearBOT
lavish haven
#

Is that some rule

#

Sine*

placid sandal
#

Do you mean the law of sines?

prisma gorge
#

Yuh it holds for all triangles in euclidean space

storm compass
#

Yes just beware. Of the AMBIGUOUS CASE!!!! Ambiguity may be among the midst of the illuminati.

dusk granite
#

yo

#

does anyone know how todo this

#

im stumped

thorn talon
#

sine rule maybe?

zenith ember
#

Law of Cosines

brittle kraken
#

5.2 was the missing side measurement of the opposite side. My bad, @lavish haven

keen aspen
#

Yep Law of Cosines

#

SAS case

brittle kraken
#

Was the method used by sweetcheaks on my question above the Law of Cosines method? I wasn't sure because idk the formula

#

Okay so I made the triangle like what sweetcheaks did. But I don't know what to do next using the law of sines. Ik that I have to input, but I'm confused because idk the other two angles for either A, B, or C.

#

I know that I need to solve to find the other angle, but idk how to do that.

keen aspen
#

No for that you would use law of sines

#

Which you have indicated on your paper

#

When you have an angle with a corresponding side and another piece of given information you use law of sines

#

If not, then you would most likely resort to the law of cosines

#

There are multiple cases when using the law of cosines tho

vast pasture
#

uh

zenith ember
#

The support post is 12 ft tall. The length of the house is 25 ft. The diagram is a right triangle, with another right triangle dropped from the right angle to the hypoteneuse

keen aspen
#

^

zenith ember
#

If you consider the angle at the left side of that triangle...

#

Then you can use trig identities, and the fact that the two triangles are similar to figure out all the distances.

vast pasture
#

but i have no idea where to start

#

all i have is

#

x * 12 = 12 * 25

#

i dont think that's correct ;/

zenith ember
#

You are right. That is not correct.

#

You know the trig identities, right? SOHCAHTOA?

vast pasture
#

no...

zenith ember
#

Hm.

#

Ok.

#

I think we're going to need labels to talk about this meaningfully.

vast pasture
#

it sayts

#

geometry

zenith ember
#

Ok, so you know AB = 25, and CD = 12.

#

You are looking for AD.

#

Following me?

waxen gorge
#

I'm not really

storm compass
#

No

#

Who stole my eyes ๐Ÿ˜ต

urban dawn
#

question, suppose we have a quadrilateral ABCD, DAB & CBA are complementary angles, AD = BC, AB = 50 CM, CD = 20CM, how can I get the area of ABCD

upper karma
#

Any diagram...

keen aspen
#

It'll look like a trapezoid I believe

#

Yeah, a regular trapezoid with bases 50 and 20

#

And the bottom two angles are 45ยฐ

#

Just find the vertical height of the trapezoid to find the area

#

Just do the tan of it or use your 45 45 90 triangle knowledge to find the height

robust rampart
#

Bob is standing under the edge of a circular dome. He walks 10 feet from the edge towards the center, looks up and sees the bottom of the dome 50 feet above him. Looking from the edge of the dome heโ€™d been standing under to the opposite end of the dome, his gaze sweeps out a 90โˆ˜ angle. How far across is the dome?

#

: a. 260 b. 100 c. 60 d. 250 (all in feet)

keen aspen
#

Not sure, I'm having troubles understanding the word problem

zenith ember
#

I think it describes this, but I haven't tried to work through the problem.

#

Close.

#

But that doesn't give an answer that is one of the options.

#

If you assume the vertical only goes to the diameter, and is 50, you -do- get one of the options for an answer.

#

So, that's probably the right way to look at it. Poorly worded, though.

robust rampart
#

so what would i end up with?

dusky yarrow
#

Find the measure of the angle between the two straight lines whose equations are: 2x=6-3y and x-5=0

#

<@&286206848099549185>

dusky yarrow
#

lets see what'll happen

upper karma
#

Hey guys can someone help me?

copper valve
#

that looks spectacularly spooky

upper karma
#

It's simpler once I explain it

#

so we have this cyclic quadrilateral, and the centers of the inner circles of the diagonals of the quadrilateral form a shape

#

I've already realized that it is a rectangle

#

but I can't prove it

#

can someone give me any tips?

#

nd the centers of the inner circles of the diagonals of the quadrilateral form a shape - what does this mean?

#

if you connect the dots

#

you get a shape

#

Ahhh

#

Ooh yeah - that's spooky

#

yeah I gotta do it tho

#

I thought I was close to the answer

#

so I begged my math teacher to give me 3 extra days

#

and now I'll bring shame to my family if I fail

#

I mean all I can think of is to abstract the centers of those circles to some trig relationship and the showing that they must lie on parallel chords.

#

Bring shame to your family?

#

Doing hard drugs brings shame to your family, not not being able to do tough geometry questions. That's how you give yourself a complex.

#

I said it jokingly but I have a feeling my math teacher thinks I'm not smart at all I only work hard for the gains

#

so I want to prove it with doing the super hard exercises he gives us for A-s that nobody can do

#

I don't care about A-s I care about my imag

#

e

#

Mmm, try to see this is an emotionally exhausting approach. But it's a good problem

#

guess I'll just stare at it

#

my theory involves manipulating the central and perimeteral(is that a word?) angles to and see where that takes me

wintry hatch
#

Owo

#

That problem though Owo

upper karma
#

I get too many lines tho

#

You need to derive the coordinates of those centers or atleast the chords that they lie on.

#

After that, it's like a couple steps to showing they form a rectangle.

#

we haven't learned coordinatal geomtry yet

#

Wat

#

they teach that in 11th grade here

#

So you're doing that all with trig?

#

yes

#

trying to*

#

Dayum.

wintry hatch
upper karma
#

well if anyone has an idea don't be shy ๐Ÿ˜„

#

wait

#

if I have two lines that cross each other, the opposite angles they form are going to be equal right?

#

Mhmm

#

I'm doing sth wrong

#

lemme check in geogebra

#

it's such a hassle to draw shapes in that thing

wintry hatch
#

Try to get some ratios with thales and thz tangents maybe?

upper karma
#

we haven't learned tangents yet so I'm not allowed to use that ๐Ÿ˜ฆ

#

we've only learned that for physics competitions and that's unofficial

#

So what all can you actually use?

wintry hatch
#

I mean, the tangents to the circle

#

Which are the diagonals

upper karma
#

Simson lines

wintry hatch
#

(well the diagonals and the sides too)

upper karma
#

angel of view

#

angle*

#

umm central and the other angles

#

you know where AOB <) = 1/2 APB <)

#

if that makes sense

#

idk the English word for it unfortunately

#

cyclic quadrilaterals

#

mostly that

#

but those exercises are usually logic based

wintry hatch
#

You know much more geometry than I do ๐Ÿ‘€

upper karma
#

oh I highly doubt that

#

I'm just making it look much

wintry hatch
#

I just know thales and Pythagore ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐Ÿ‘€

upper karma
#

those are very useful tools

#

I have a theory now

#

but it doesn't feel right

#

Run us through it

#

let me draw it in paint because my English mathematical dictionary is too lacking to describe it

#

so I can prove that

#

the angles described by the same color are equal

#

if two angles of a rectangle are equal that means they are similar

#

and that proves something because the center of the inner circle of a triangle always stays in the same place no matter how you change it's sides as long as the two triangles are similar

#

it is as if I mirrored the similar triangles and then changed their sides

#

aand

#

that proves nothing

#

damn

#

It's a start.

#

I have an idea

#

turns out

#

all four triangles are similar

#

and from here if I use the green and the purple angles

#

that could lead to somewhere

#

I can appreciate that the opposite triangles are similar.

#

it's as if I rotated the central points by the green and the purple angles

#

But I am skeptical that all four triangles are similar.

#

they always have a red-black angle and a red and a black angle

#

if I'm correct

#

Yeah

#

I was going to point out one diagrammatic inconsistency.

#

But you were getting somewhere with opposite triangles being similr.

#

could you explain what diagrammatic inconsistency is? ๐Ÿ˜„

#

please

#

Sure, the two red angles inside one of the triangles are not equal unless the chord in the triangle is parallel to the bisection of the green angle.

#

Or if the where the two diagonal lines happen to cross is the origin of the larger inscribing circle.

#

they should be tho should they not

#

since green=2black

#

I mean

#

purple=2black

#

green=2red

#

if we only look at two angles

#

and from there you can go around with that and name every angle red or black or green or purple

#

can you not?

#

I'm just intuiting from the diagram.

#

You have two diagonals that meet right? That gives you a green angle.

#

Now only if you draw a line that intersects the two diagonals at points the same distance from where they diagonals meet, will you get two equal angles.

#

This is not necessarily the case with these triangles.

#

oh of course I'm so stupid

#

The opposites triangles are similar but the two angles aren't.

#

indeed

#

And of that, I am also dubious.

#

the black and red angles are not at all equal

#

like nowhere

#

I messed it up

#

okay I have no idea ๐Ÿ˜„

#

It's a good place to start.

#

I'd start by proving that the opposite triangles are similar though.

#

I can't prove it because I made a wrong assumption in the beginning so it's uncertain the two opposite triangles are similar

#

tho

#

I could use the fact that the shape is a cyclic quadrilateral

#

unfortunately I have no idea how to take that notion further

#

hmmm unless

#

nope

#

I mean this is one hell of a problem to tackle with the cyclical geometry.

#

with only cyclical geometry.

#

I can use angles of view

#

and simson lines

#

but that's pretty much it

#

we've only started learning about angles and stuff

#

hmm

#

I'll think about it until tomorrow, I usually manage to figure out though problems right before I fall asleep

#

thanks for the help though @upper karma ^^

#

I still adore your name

wintry hatch
#

You should really look up the tangents to the circles

#

I've tried drawing your figure with Geogebra and it's very hard to keep up with the tangents things, so it means there are some precise conditions to them

dusk quartz
#

yo, is there a way to calculate the area of a shape that has 4 sides, but neither one is the same?

patent lion
#

What measurements about the shape are you given?

#

Like side lengths and angle measures I mean

dusk quartz
#

well, the angle measures i don't think so, but i have all of the side lenghts, the left side, the right side, the top, and the bottom

patent lion
#

I think you need at least one angle measure

dusk quartz
#

actually, i think that all of the angle measures are 90 degrees

patent lion
#

Well, if they are all 90 then the shape is a rectangle

dusk quartz
#

well, maybe, but the shape's height isn't the same, for example, on the left side, it is 5, but on the right, its 7

patent lion
#

Do you have a picture?

dusk quartz
#

alright, just a sec, here i will make one. Also thanks for taking your time to help me :D

patent lion
#

Oh

#

It's a trapezoid

#

So

#

The area

#

Where the side on the right is b_1

#

The side on the left is b_2

#

And the one on the bottom (the same as the distance between b_1 and b_2) is h

#

The area can be written as

#

$$A = \frac{b_1 + b_2}{2} \cdot h$$

charred spearBOT
dusk quartz
#

thanks so much :D

patent lion
#

This is only the case when b_1 and b_2 are parallel

#

And if the bottom side is slanted, then you need the distance between b_1 and b_2 for h

dusk quartz
#

ah, i understand, thanks so much again ^^

dusk quartz
#

sorry to plop in so quickly again, but how do i calculate a triangle's height given that i know it's 3 sides?

#

sorry this is probably a noob question :P

patent lion
#

That's actually something I don't know offhand

dusk quartz
#

:(

#

well, if anyone knows, please tell me

dusk quartz
dusk quartz
#

alright, sorry to blop in again, but how would i calculate the distance between b_1 and b_2?

#

this has really been bothering me

#

i can't figure it out at all :(

charred spearBOT
upper urchin
#

For any two points fo the form (x1,x2,x3,...,xn)

brittle kraken
#

Every time I keep trying to find sinB, I always get an error

#

Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?

#

The answer is supposed to be 95%

covert orchid
#

@brittle kraken i dont know a lot of english but the number that is inside the sen-1 must be in a range between -1 and 1

#

If you try to calc the sen-1 of 1.00000001 you're gonna get an error

brittle kraken
#

Well damn

#

I'm trying to get an angle that is 95 degrees, but I don't know what to do

#

I've used the law of sines

covert orchid
#

Let me check...

thorn talon
#

is this the start of the question?

#

or follow on from previously found values?

brittle kraken
#

Follow on, hold on, I'll take a picture of the question itself

#

I drew that so I could see what law would work

#

It is supposed to be 95 degrees, but I'm trying to show work

full mortar
brittle kraken
#

I tried using the law of sines but idk if I did it correctly, since what I've done cannot be converted into an angle

shadow anvil
#

=tex \frac{\sin\left(52\right)}{5.2}=\frac{\sin\left(\theta\right)}{6.6}\\sin\left(\theta\right)=\frac{6.6\sin\left(52\right)}{5.2}\\theta=\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{6.6\sin\left(52\right)}{5.2}\right)

charred spearBOT
shadow anvil
#

=pup calc \frac{6.6\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{180}*52\right)}{5.2}

charred spearBOT
shadow anvil
#

oh

#

Ok

#

That's interesting

brittle kraken
#

Yeah.... I need to get 95 degrees as my angle, but I can't seem to since my calculator always says I got an error.

brittle kraken
#

Got up to that but I end up getting the same exact thing, not getting the answer that I'm supposed to have

covert orchid
#

Wait

#

The result says 83.16 degrees

brittle kraken
#

Damn... Sorry to say, but the answer HAS to be 95ยฐ as it was the correct answer when I scanned it.

covert orchid
#

I mean i think that you cannot do it with las of sines because i'm pretty sure that the sen-1 will never be more than 90 degrees

brittle kraken
#

I see

#

Does law of cosines work?

#

I tried it earlier but I get different results.

covert orchid
#

Let me see what you did

#

What

brittle kraken
#

Dw I threw my work away using law of cosines as a form of frustration lol

#

<@&286206848099549185> care to help with that please? I'm definitely confused.

#

@celest obsidian it has to be possible because the answer was generated to be 95ยฐ>

#

I have

#

No

#

What I've done

#

It does?

#

I could but my teacher wants specific details in order for myself to move on

#

:/

charred spearBOT
brittle kraken
#

Right, thank you

covert orchid
#

Yay

#

At least i did know what to do jajaja

upper karma
#

good for u

brittle kraken
#

Can it be CosB btw?

#

Considering the angle for A is given already

#

Unless I'm doing this incorrectly

#

I'm getting .99994 and .620

covert orchid
#

wat

brittle kraken
#

I'm trying to use the law of cosines, all I'm getting now is weird answers

#

They don't show errors, but I always get .99999 or .6203

covert orchid
#

let me 5 min to recall the lay of cosines i'll help

brittle kraken
#

Unless I'm doing this cosine thing wrong

#

Alright

covert orchid
#

okay

sturdy bolt
#

is your calculator set to degrees or radians @brittle kraken

brittle kraken
#

Degrees

#

Is it supposed to be radians?

covert orchid
#

It's okay in degrees

brittle kraken
#

Is that 0109 or 0.09?

covert orchid
#

0.09

brittle kraken
#

Oh okay thank you

covert orchid
#

Hahahah you're welcome, i'm sorry in latin America we use the comma instead of dot

brittle kraken
#

It's fine

#

Also why does the negative symbol move up (it was at the denominator but now it's at the numerator)?

covert orchid
#

You can move up the negative if it's in the denominator

#

If you want you can leave the negative symbol in the denominator

#

You're gonna get the same result

#

Try using the negative symbol in the denominator

upper karma
#

help

#

needed

#

asap

upper karma
#

google cosine rule and apply it

full mortar
dusk quartz
#

hello everybody, i need some help, i have no idea how to calculate the distance between the blue line, and the red line. Please help! [also, the lines are not parrellel]

dusk quartz
#

anybody? please?

copper valve
#

the blue and red are not parallel?

#

what information are you given

opal blaze
#

yes becase they are 90 degrees that means part of the circle the angles are spanning over is equal to 180 degrees or pi. Therefore it is the diameter of the circle. @full mortar

dusk quartz
#

@copper valve well im given the size of all of the lines, is that enough?

#

@opal blaze what do you mean?

dusk quartz
#

?

opal blaze
#

Sorry wrong person @dusk quartz

dusk quartz
#

ah, okay

opal blaze
#

Well if the black lines are paralell and of the same length. That means the blue line and the red line have the same length.

dusk quartz
#

well, maybe, but how would i calculate the distance between them?

opal blaze
#

I am unsure if that is possible only given the length of 2 parlell lines.

dusk quartz
#

:(

opal blaze
#

Are there more information and does it have an awnser?

#

Brb

dusk quartz
#

well, it sadly doesn't have a answer. Since this isn't a quiz, im using this for programming purposes. Also, it depends, since it's for programming purposes, maybe i can try and get the angels of the corners. But would that help?

#

alright, tell me when you're back

dusk quartz
#

hello?

#

well, i guess you're not coming back :(

opal blaze
#

I am in school atm. But if you think of this as vectors you need 2 to creat a new one. @dusk quartz

dusk quartz
#

?

#

im not really sure what you mean?

dusk quartz
#

alrgiht, ping me when u get back

opal blaze
#

@dusk quartz you need a relation between the two lines.

dusk quartz
#

sorry for being a noob, but can you explain a bit further? sorry again. EDIT: Actually, i got another idea that i can try to solve my problem, thanks larzanda

wheat bramble
#

does the alternate segment theoreum work on all triangles inscribed in a circle?

waxen gorge
#

@wheat bramble ya

wheat bramble
#

how can I proof that two different angles in a circle subtended from the same arc has the same value?

raven robin
#

Could I have a few example problems on the formula rhombus, trapezoid, and triangle?

#

I'm reviewing for a quiz

upper karma
#

Hi, do somebody know how to prove this property:

Let be 4 points A, B, C, D, if and only if [AC] and [BD] intersect in their middle then the quadrilateral ABCD is a parallelogram.

upper sedge
#

Since the question concerns how to prove it, I'll take that to mean "What would the structure of such a proof look like?" as I proceed.

It's an if and only if statement, so first break it into two parts.

a) if [AC] and [BD] intersect in the middle, then the quadrilateral ABCD is a parallelogram.

b) if the quadrilateral ABCD is a parallelogram, then [AC] and [BD] must intersect in the middle.

Very loosely: (Read: There is more rigor to apply here that I'm glossing over.)

a) Suppose I have lines [AC] and [BD], and suppose that they intersect at the midpoint, m, between all points. Now, take the line from m to the line [AB] such that it intersects [AB] at a right angle. If we continue the line in the other direction, note that [CD] is also intersected at a right angle. This shows that [AB] and [CD] are parallel. Do the same for [AD] and [BC] to complete this sub-proof.

b) This is essentially a) in reverse. Start by noting that the parallel lines in the parallelogram are parallel, and find the midpoints for the lines that form the edges of the parallelogram, and then show from those the midpoint of the parallelogram. Finally, show that it's the same as the point where the diagonals intersect.

From here, since will have shown both the if case and the only if case, the theorem will have been proven.

I'll reiterate, this is very loose, and I'm skipping over the algebraic part of it because the question seems directed at the structure of the proof.

#

Does this help @upper karma ?

zenith ember
#

I did it by alternate interior angles and similar triangles. ๐Ÿ˜›

upper sedge
#

That works too!

upper karma
upper karma
#

Which question?

remote kiln
#

hey all - i have a set of four points (some sort of quadrilateral) on a 3D plane...is there a way to find a clockwise ordering of these points, about the plane's normal?

zenith ember
#

I can think of a way to do it, but it's pretty tedious.

#

Basically pick any three of the four points, and use them to generate an orthogonal basis for the plane. Then transform ABCD into that basis and convert to polar.

#

Thinking a little more about it, if you pick one point, and take the three difference vectors to the remaining three points...

#

The magnitude of the cross product divided by the magnitude of the vectors gives you the sin of the angle between them.

#

I think you could use that to generate an ordering.

supple lotus
#

Hello, I have following function for shader to draw a cone:
p is Vector3 of xyz of starting point, not sure what c stands for exactly.
Could someone enlighten me of how to properly edit c?
If I change c[0] it changes the narrowness of cone, but c[1] affect it also

zenith ember
#

I don't have enough information to guess what this is doing. Sorry

upper karma
#

help

#

nvm I got it

remote kiln
#

@zenith ember yep, the signed angle method is what i ended up doing..a bit tedious, as you said, but works!

#

thank you!

zenith ember
#

yw

upper karma
#

Hey Iโ€™m not in geometry is the answer 54?

#

I think it is because 26+82=108

#

and 180-108 = 172

#

I mean 72*

#

So angle b is 72

#

And then

#

180-72=108

#

108/2=54

#

=pup solve 54*2

charred spearBOT
upper karma
#

Ok I think I got it

charred spearBOT
#

Rendering failed. Check your code. You can edit your existing message if needed.

brittle kraken
#

What do I have to do to solve this?

#

Do I need to follow a theorem or something?

#

Is the answer C?

brittle kraken
#

Yeah I doubt it has a theorem, thanks btw.

brittle kraken
#

I keep getting -22.3 as my x but it ends up being wrong.

upper urchin
#

what equation are you starting with?

brittle kraken
#

I started with 84.5 - 5x = 642 + 20x, then turned it into 84.5 - 25x = 642

#

I tried going the other side to make it 84.5 = 642 + 25x, but I get the same result

upper urchin
#

are you multiplying the sides on the same triangle?

brittle kraken
#

No

#

Am I supposed to?

upper urchin
#

no

#

I'm just trying to work out how you got that equation

brittle kraken
#

Oh

upper urchin
#

oh I see

brittle kraken
#

But to no avail with a valid answer lol

upper urchin
#

you're not combining the fraction correctly

brittle kraken
#

Ah

charred spearBOT
brittle kraken
#

Ye I cross multiplied

#

Then I got that equation

upper urchin
#

you cross multiplied wrong

brittle kraken
#

Oh

upper urchin
#

if what I'm saying

brittle kraken
#

Fuck

#

YEAH

#

I see it now lmfao

#

My bad, thank you very much

upper urchin
#

np

brittle kraken
#

Okay now I don't know how to do this one

upper urchin
#

well what do you need to be able to uniquely define a triangle?

brittle kraken
#

Theorems/postulates?

zenith ember
#

Think SSS

#

Or SAS

stuck jewel
#

what do i do next?

#

i cant isolate "a" with the inverse cosh

zenith ember
#

I would sub in the 1/2(e^x + e^-x) formula for cosh

stuck jewel
#

how would i log a sum of (e^x + e^-x)?

#

actually, how do you log something simpler like this?

#

=tex 2^3 + 2^4

charred spearBOT
zenith ember
#

You don't.

stoic adder
#

can someone prove to me why this is true?

zenith ember
#

@stoic adder I assume the inscribed triangle is equilateral?

stoic adder
#

yes

zenith ember
#

Ok. Lemme work on it a bit.

#

@stoic adder So, fundamentally, this problem comes down to one of similar triangles.

stoic adder
#

ok

zenith ember
#

What you're trying to show is that the radius of the larger circle is twice the radius of the smaller circle.

#

The radius of the larger circle is DC

#

And the radius of the smaller circle is DA_1

#

Following me so far?

stoic adder
#

yeah

zenith ember
#

Ok.

#

So the most interesting triangle is DCA_1

#

And you can show, pretty easily, that DCA_1 is a 30-60-90 right triangle.

#

Which means that DC is twice DA_1.

#

And you're done. ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

mortal briar
#

This is my problem

upper karma
#

?

mortal briar
#

I have a fan that is 4.7 x 4.7. Height is no issue. These fans need to be equally spaced across a block of aluminum with the remader of free space in-between each fan. Meaning the 2 most outer fans would be parallel vertically with the ends of the block.

#

The block is 24 inches long

#

does that make since?

upper karma
#

@rugged moat yay can help (let's bring question here as the other channel is busy)

#

Mad scientist is here to help ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

mortal briar
#

ok

#

I was confused because the rooms just disappeared

upper karma
#

naag sry @mortal briar that's another question

rugged moat
#

I am here

upper karma
#

but you can ping Helpers so that helpers will notice your question @mortal briar

#

well $$\dfrac{|b|}{|c|}$$ is what you want right?

charred spearBOT
upper karma
#

but what is $$|c|$$

charred spearBOT
rugged moat
#

Yup

upper karma
#

or actually $$|c|^2$$

charred spearBOT
upper karma
#

it's $$c\cdot c$$

charred spearBOT
upper karma
#

but $$c=a+b$$

charred spearBOT
upper karma
#

so this becomes $$(a+b)\cdot(a+b)$$

charred spearBOT
upper karma
#

expand & Eurรชka

mortal briar
#

Ummm what just happend?

rugged moat
#

What do you mean by expand?

#

@upper karma

mortal briar
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

I have a fan that is 4.7 x 4.7. Height is no issue. These fans need to be equally spaced across a block of aluminum with the remader of free space in-between each fan. Meaning the 2 most outer fans would be parallel vertically with the ends of the block.
The block is 24 inches long

upper karma
#

@rugged moat things like $$(x+y)z=xz+yz$$

charred spearBOT
rugged moat
#

a2 +b2+2ab?

upper karma
#

yep

#

but

#

$$a\cdot a=|a|^2$$

charred spearBOT
upper karma
#

same for b

wary steeple
#

how do you calculate the 'minimum' tangent for a given point?

#

from a line that extends from the middle of a circle

upper karma
#

What is that 40 degrees measuring?

#

Like what angle?

wary steeple
#

the point on the circlke

#

if 0 is top

upper karma
#

Confused

wary steeple
#

how high does the line that goes straight up need to be to have diect line of sight with a point at 40 degrees

upper karma
#

What is your answer in terms of? Radians?

#

Doesn't look like you were given any units

wary steeple
#

the radius is 2000

#

40 / 90 is .44....

#

so i took

#

44 percent of 2000

#

is 880

#

so the slope is the ratio of 880 over 2000

sudden stream
#

I need help with both cause I donโ€™t understand either

keen aspen
#

Do you know the relations of side lengths with secant lines?

sudden stream
#

@keen aspen Nope.

keen aspen
#

(A+B)*B=(C+D)*D

sudden stream
#

Cool. Now how is that applyable to Question 5?

keen aspen
#

(5+4)*4=(ZC+2)*2

sudden stream
#

I see.

#

Could I have help with

#

6?

#

@keen aspen

keen aspen
#

Angle BMN=1/2(AP-BN)

sudden stream
#

We have to find AP

#

We have BMN

#

it's 12(degrees)

keen aspen
#

12=1/2(AP-33)?

sudden stream
#

yes

#

Ohh

#

I see.

#

Thanks!

#

@keen aspen so the final answer would be 57

keen aspen
#

yes

sudden stream
#

cool

#

thanks.

upper karma
#

I miss geometry lol

#

When math was so simple

upper karma
#

@ocean quartz Back to your problem

#

so I edited the question where I explained furthur things I understood

#

no one answered me, but someone commented but couldnt' find his ideas helpful

#

never mind

#

so at the end

#

for your algorithm

#

given any $$\alpha$$ and $$\beta$$

charred spearBOT
upper karma
#

you can determine $$r$$ as follows

charred spearBOT
upper karma
#

firstly

#

check that $$\beta\in\left(0,\dfrac{\alpha\pi}{2}\right)$$

charred spearBOT
upper karma
#

because with this construction

#

$$\beta$$ can't exceed $$\dfrac{\alpha\pi}{2}$$

charred spearBOT
upper karma
#

secondly

#

once this condition is satified

#

you consider the function

#

$$f(x)=\beta-x\pi+x\arctan\left(\dfrac{\sqrt{(\alpha-x)^2-x^2}}{x}\right)$$

charred spearBOT
upper karma
#

this function will have exactly one solution

#

that you can approximate using numerical methods

#

the easisest method is this:

ocean quartz
#

@upper karma thank you very much! I actually just finished. I'll make a demo in a moment.

upper karma
#

You're welcome ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

#

that's cool!

#

Would like to see the results!

#

๐Ÿ˜‰

ocean quartz
#

@upper karma also I used yesterday's formula. Maybe will redo with later one.

brittle kraken
eager pendant
#

do you know what similar means?

brittle kraken
#

Not in mathematical terms lol

fallow quail
#

For similar triangles ABC~DEF, with sides a,b,c and d,e,f respectively, they usually use stuff like:
a/d=b/e comparing the ratio of 2-2 sides of the different triangles, but can you use a/b=d/e for e.g? Checking the ratio of 2 sides in each triangle?

eager pendant
#

@brittle kraken look up what a similar triangle is in geomtry

#

and make sure you can make the distinction

#

between a similar triangles and congruent triangles

#

@fallow quail yes. in fact, given you know you can use a/d=b/e, you can get to ae=bd, which means a/b=d/e

fallow quail
#

Ah, right, thank you. Just the fact that my math book always used only one of those, kinda confused me

brittle kraken
#
Jazza - Today at 10:09 PM
@Kyle look up what a similar triangle is in geomtry(edited)
and make sure you can make the distinction
between a similar triangles and congruent triangles(edited)```

Okay, so in using the information I got from similar triangles here: 
https://www.varsitytutors.com/hotmath/hotmath_help/topics/similar-triangles
My answer is A, right? since the shape is scaled down from its actual size
#

Or is it B?

fallow quail
#

You need to either have all 3 sides of the triangle be proportional to each other, or 2 sides and an angle between them being the same

#

Neither A or B has that

#

27/8 does not equal 45/19 and 15/6 does not equal 30/19

#

@brittle kraken

brittle kraken
#

I see

fallow quail
#

But if you check C, 24/36 will be equal to 30/45

#

So you can say C is similar

brittle kraken
#

45/36 = 50/40 = 40/32 all scaled up to 5/4

upper sedge
#

Yep

upper karma
#

@ocean quartz Oh nice animations!

upper sedge
#

Animations?

#

Did I miss something interesting?

upper karma
#

Shenzao RIP you were pinged xD

#

look ahead

#

oh notice that when alpha groes, sure r groes as well

upper sedge
#

Ah, I see the tag.

upper karma
#

but seems that r doesn't grow too much!

#

in fact from the formula

#

$$\beta=r\pi-r\arctan\left(\dfrac{\sqrt{(\alpha-r)^2-r^2}}{r}\right).$$