#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 159 of 1
ok
so i'm going to draw a line and give some points names
mhmm
brb
@fleet rivet i'm back
so
QA = 1, since it's a radius of our circle
is that clear?
@fleet rivet
yep
thus, by the old definitions, we have cos(θ) = QB/QA = QB and sin(θ) = AB/QA = AB
Wait what, QB/QA = QB?
yeah ok
What about tan?
Ahhh ok!
there is a geometric representation of tan though!
yup sure does
if you make this blue line (the tangent axis, as my highschool math teacher called it) a number line, with its 0 aligned with that point where it meets the circle and its 1 the same size as the radius of the circle, then the point where your angle's side and this line intersect is precisely tan(θ)
Thanks!
how many sides does a sphere have
what shape is a human
depends on if it has spherical chicken pet.
ok
how many sides does a sphere have
define side?
A human can be said to be a composite shape.
made up of complexed shapes, and the human is formed from DNA, which we can mathematically analyze and look at how the human being will develope into (assuming no outside factors inhibit growth) and even still
We can use parametric equations and even zero-product property to make a sketch of a human being @i am cheese#5604
or we could assume our human is spherical and frictionless , less forces to compute
can someone help me for an exercise please
sure
in English it must be why the points "B,E,O and D are aligned"?
*"why the points B,E,O and D are aligned ?"
you understand?
why is it a straight line if you connect the 4 points I guess
yeah exactly
It wouldn't be a straight line
the exercise asks why would it be a straight line if you connect these 4 points
why wouldn't it though
you gotta prove why it does that
Because if you made a diagonal out of B O D it would contain all points except for E
do you say that from what you're seeing?
yeah found for B O D but but don't know for E
if we are assuming that the 4 points would make a straight line if connected
You are trying to prove that they ARE ?
But they aren't..
but they are
^
Ok I don't see the straight line
the page is bent
Yes I know that doesn't include E
it does?
E is between the circled points
E is on there mate 😄
circled points ??
Is E the circle ?
Oh shit lmao
no E is the small line
no e is just a point
yeah ok no it's not the circle sorry not being clear 😂
BI is half the length of AD, EI is half the length of AE
BEI is similar to AED
something something geometry
😛
didn't understand :///
sorry im not good at this stuff so im even worse at explaining :c
yeah know that
oh yeah i understood all that
but
why does it prove that E is aligned with B O And D
ok if you find please say it to me
ok
so nobody found?
Haha i'm afraid not
it's a difficult question
The only thing I can think of is that if you made a triangle out of ABC, the centroid would be E, because A goes to I (The midpoint of BC) and B goes to O (In this case is the midpoint of AC)
So with that, the intersection of those lines form the centroid, at E meaning why E is on that same line
@keen aspen what is centroid
The center of the medians
oh ok
medians of a triangle is the line from one point to the opposite side, half way
Bisecting the line
yeah i know but I'm french so not the same words
haha ok
No problem
i had a second exercise if you can help me that would be very kind but if you don't want to no problem
(MH)//(RE)
and there's LR which is i don't know how to say it English but the line from R which is perpendicular to (EC)
ok
and the triangle REC rectangle in R
?
ehmm it means REC is a triangle and the angle ERC is 90°
and that's all there is no more informations
MR and CH
Ahhh ok
A bit
It's difficult
What grade are you in?
Yeah I don't see it for this one, it's a bit too hard for me and I was never good with proving stuff 😦
I'm in France soo I don't exactly know for England but I'm 15
Wow that's pretty difficult
but yeah I don't see how you can prove that sadly, someone else might, i'm by no means the most intelligent lol
no that's very kind for your help thank you very much
it's 1 am i gotta sleep right now so good night
gn
That's the same as proving the existence of an orthocenter
Let P be the foot of perpendicular from M to BC, and let Q be the intersection of RM and CH
Then since C, P, H, L are concyclic LCH = LPH
And since R, M, L, P are concyclic LCM = LRM
This proves that LCQ = LRQ, proving that L, C, R, Q are concyclic
This is sufficient to determine that CQR = CLR = 90°.
concyclic!?
Ye, concyclic owo
Eh bored:
Theorem: The distance between (a, b) and y = x is |a - b|/(root(2)).
Likely pointlessly long but imho cool proof: (a, b) is the same distance away from y = x as (a + d, b + d) ... we are sliding along a line parallel to y = x.
Lemma: When y = -x, the coordinate (x, y) becomes (x, -x) and
the distance between (x, -x) and line y = x is the same as the distance between (x, -x) and (0, 0) or |x|(root(2)).
Let d = -(b + a)/2. (a + d, b + d) becomes ((a - b)/2,(b - a)/2). Distance = |x|(root(2) = |a - b|/(root(2))
Reason: Reddit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/calculus/comments/7jbuoq/help_attempting_to_find_the_volume_of_a_solid_of/
I have this two part question on a maths assignment that I need to get done by Monday else I will really badly affect my final grade for the course I’m on.
The functions for x1 and x2 are from the prior question, I wrote them in the space below to avoid needing to take more photos. If my writing is bad I can post better versions of said functions.
but yes
no
👀🔨
I’ll upload the digital version of the functions for you. I’m sorry I couldn’t photograph the question any larger
Oh dear
That should be better
um no
The ways to find R and alpha for the second part I have on a formula sheet so I should be ok for the second part
Only the first part if anything, and with formatting working out.
for the first part just expand it out
every pentagons sum of interior angles is the same which is 54
just woke up
ok
Ik this is dumb but how to find the slope of the tangent line formed by a point on a circles circumference
it's perpendicular to the corresponding radius
😐
the slope of the tangent line is opposite to the slope of the radius in the sense that it's -1/m if the slope of the radius is m
that's called perpendicular
lol
But like
That's not what I'm asking
Cuz if the point is 1/8 up the circle the slope is -x
But if it's 1/6 up it's not
No but I mean like 45°
of the problem, preferably?
it's not a problem I was just wondering cuz in a competition thing I didn't know what to do
Nvm
okay but do you have a picture of the setup you're trying to describe?
No it's fine
So do I use trig to get the slope of the radius?
NVM u get the coordinates of the point
Slope is rise over run right?
Ye my brain is ded rn
What is Circumference of the circle
C = PiD
How do you find the slope of a tangent line?
- Find the first derivative of f(x). 2) Plug x value of the indicated point into f '(x) to find the slope at x. 3) Plug x value into f(x) to find the y coordinate of the tangent point. 4) Combine the slope from step 2 and point from step 3 using the point-slope formula to find the equation for the tangent line.
tangent line to the graph of a function
fuck i'm not in a good state of mind right now
i've got two lines in R^3, L1 and L2, and i have their direction vectors
u and v respectively
u is for L1, v is for L2
me neither xd
i want to find the eq of the plane that passes through L1 and is perpendicular to L2
i've got n = u x v calculated from previous parts of this assignment
u mean L1 is on the plane? completely
they always are
they
aren't
No wait, maybe I was right
nx+uy for scalars x,y is every pt in the plane
hhh
okay wait
i think i figured it out
the vectors n and u have to be in the plane
yup
that spans the 2D space
so i can just compute n x u
and use that as my normal, and that point i had on L1
thanks y'all
i think i just needed a place to talk this out
find h in terms of x?
I had to convert it from English so if you need any other/better explaining I'm here
whats asked by the question
I need to find the diagonals
which one
i mean what is the question asking
I need to figure out the length of the diagonals
both AC and BD?
yeah, in an actual number
well |BE|×|EC|=|AE|×|ED|
the problem is I can't seem to produce any isolated equations
I can give the diagonals 4y+9y and 4k+9k values
but I have messed around with it and couldn't get anything from it
Cheeze ur disappointing me :/
sryyy, what am i doing
I've messed around trying to do similar things for quite a while
and couldn't find anything useful
Look at shared sides
Ec(Be) = 216 and ec(de) = 486 so we found a relationship for one diagonal
Alsoo
That is not rly useful
And I'm dumb
And I need to use my brain
243 triangle is 279 and 108 is 274
ikrrr
Times
Be is 4
Ed is 9
Bd is 13
Ec is 27
Wait lemme retry
Wait
That's wronf
BC^2 = 97x^2 - h2
How bout
Ok so top triangle is 2^5(3)
Bottom is 3^5(2)
Left and right are 3^3(2^3)
Right and bottom share one side.
Bottom and left do too
man this is like unsolvable
Pretty sure there's a way to do in like 10 seconds
ahahaha
its so bizarre
Like all problems smh
can u like
I don't really remember math
translate the entire question
but it seemed easy
there must be something that we missed
Wait I'ma write it on a piece of paper so I can think
sure 1 sec
In a trapezoid ABCD the diagonals AC and BD meet at point E (see picture).
- It is given that the bases of the trapezoid are ratio'd 4:9 and the surface of BEC is 108. What is the surface of the trapezoid?
oh the area
X*H/2
for a triangle
😄
- It is given that the tapezoid is a right trapezoid (90 degrees) and the diagonals are perpendicular. What are the diagonals length?
and the given drawing is http://prntscr.com/hod6cp
AE^2 + BE^2 = 16x^2
DE^2 + CE^2 = 81x^2
AE^2 + BE^2 + CE^2 + DE^2 = 97x^2
AE^2 + DE^2 = h^2
BE^2 + CE^2 = 97x^2 - h^2
BC^2 = 97x^2 - h^2
BC^2 = (DC - AB)^2 + AD^2
BC^2 = 25x^2 + h^2
97x^2 - h^2 = 25x^2 + h^2
72x^2 = 2h^2
h = 6x
area of ABD = 0.5(4x)(h) = 0.5(4x)(6x) = 12x^2 = 156
x = sqrt(13)
i finally solved it
is that guess and check?
oh
Found shared stuff
thats a simpler way i guess
damn nice
but that is insane
It has nothing to do with the given new information
Maybe there is something wrong with this question
anyhow thanks a lot guys @b l e h.#5296 @upper karma
@b l e h.#5296
@waxen gorge
theres nothing wrong with the question
Wait cheeze
sqrt(13) doesn't really work
you then have BD^2=4sqrt(13)+6^2sqrt(13)^2
Lol
what did you do @waxen gorge?
what doesnt work there
I found the prime factorizations of the areas
And then linked them
To ones that share sides in the triangles
It's pretty slow and there must be a faster way to do it in like a minute
it gives BD^2 = 16x^2 + 36x^2 = 52x^2
BD = sqrt(52)x = 26
what do u mean sqrt(13) doesnt work?
idk how to mention u cos its difficult to mention but what
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
youre probably gonna need to prove that angle bfe is congruent to angle bef
Notice it's a bisector
angle AFD = 90 - o = angle BFE
angle AEB = 90 - o = angle BEF
so angle BEF = angle BFE
so triangle BFE is isosceles
and BF = BE
seems legit enough to me
Ya
👍🏼
Lol
looks like we're gonna use isosceles triangles again
gotta prove that angle dah = angel dha
mmhm
i extended BM until it cut AD extended at P and got BCM congruent to PDM
mhmm!
no idea how to continue
You're almost there though x'D
let angle DAH = x, angle DPM = CBM = 90 - x
if i assume DA = DH id be able to do it lol
So close qwq
yeah u know what i mean
lol
how do u do it help
Where did u get P
i extended BM until it cut AD extended at P and got BCM congruent to PDM
Ah
yeah that
analytic geom will always get this kind of stuff right 😃
D is the midpoint of AP
"And therefore D is the circumcenter of APH, proving that DA = DH"
OH MY GOD
that's all you needed xd
AAAAAAAAAAAA
ikr x'D
a
im super close
my god i knew it it has sth to do with a circle
man these geom problems are always fun
really?
nah >)
if only i knew enough geometry to make decent problems on them xd
Like Erdos says problems are fun only if you know how to do them or if the Devil isn't asking you for the answer 😃

Here, a famous problem
find the red angle without using trigonometric ratios and pythagorean theorem
Define trigometric ratio
oof. Couldn't find the Erdos quote.
sin, cos, tan, and their inverses?
It is in N is a Number though
kinda reminds me of this problem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5evLoL0xwg
Three Square Geometry Problem More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓ Featuring Professor Zvezdelina Stankova. Extra footage1: http://youtu.be/TIwSs...
It is a documentary from 1993 and I think I got the video and the clip on youtube. Ramsey numbers.
@tropic stirrup is it 45
Ye
let the squares (from left to right) be ABCD BEHC and EFGH
i extend the line FH until it meets point J when FJ = 2√2
the red angle is angle CDF + angle HAF = arctan(1/2) + arctan(1/3)
from triangle DFJ: DJ = √2 and FJ = 2√2, so angle DFJ = arctan(1/2)
from triangle DFJ, angle JDH + angle HDF + angle DFJ + angle FJD = 180°
45° + arctan(1/3) + arctan(1/2) + 90°
arctan(1/3) + arctan(1/2) = 45°
Fokkin hell
what the fork
i was drawing lines after lines and kinda found a way to do it
i guess gurls geom problems always need auxiliary segments to solve
how do you show that's 45 without pythagoras?
its isosceles
congruent to what?
Gah
Tiredness doesn't justify your oblivion of basic congruence
those two blue triangles are congruent
(SAS congruence, if you ask)
o ok
uwu
I thought you were saying the 45-90-45 triangle was congruent to something
lol
so I was very confused :^)
Shush you got the point across
Just
shhhhush
Lol
Do you know what is the sum of the interior angle of a triangle?
180?
Ok
wait wait
Now divide that polygon to 2 triangles
I hope you know how to divide it (there's 2 ways, either way is fine)
👌
@fierce tide the sum of the interior angles of a polygon with n sides is (n-2)(180)
why is that true?
got it
exercise
Because
(n-2)(180) is the sum of the interior angles
Where n is the number of sides
by above formula given by bleh
angles of a 6 sided figure will add up to (6-2)(180) = 4*180 = 720
we have two right angles, so thats 90+90=180 degrees
180 + 4x = 720
4x = 720-180 = 540
x = 135
6 sides
x + 3x + 45 + 45 + 135 + 135 = 720
4x + (45 + 135) + (45 + 135) = 720
4x + 180 + 180 = 720
4x = 720 - 360
4x = 360
you can do the rest 😛
x times 3
that looks like some
nonagon
sum of interior angles = 180(n-2)
since nonagon is 9 sided, 180(9-2) = 1260
1260/9 = 140
what 3+?
3 or more
2160?
ok
so 12-2*180?
(12-2)*180 yes
that is the sum of the interior angles of a 12 sided polygon
so whats the measure of each interior angle?
150
yep
thx
no problem
Hey there!
I got the next problem
ABCD is a Trepeze
A + C = 180
I need to prove that the Trepeze's DA = CB```
Yea
I don't know that D + B = 180
i said beta + delta = 180°
it follows trivially that α = β and γ = δ
I need to prove it tho
alpha + gamma = 180
alpha + delta = 180
alpha + gamma = alpha + delta
gamma = delta
How do you know that alpha + delta = 180?
you're given that, no?
I said A + C is 180, that's it
yes
and on your picture, you marked A and C with the letters alpha and delta respectively
ohhh I got you now ok
alpha + gamma = 180 (cause trepeze)
alpha + delta = 180 (given)
alpha + gamma = alpha + delta / alpha goes away cause algebra and
gamma = delta
Thanks!
does anyone know how to do proofs
Ya
just post your problem
hey anyone here, if anyone can help me dm me please?
we cant help you on a test though =p
as part one of my finals is tomorrow
and
i need help with my review packet
as i dont know half the shit im doing
Post it here
well
i dont know where to start
okay heres one - point q is the interior of <ROS. S is in the interior of <QOP. P is in the interior of < SOT. m<ROT = 127, m<SOT = 71, and m<ROQ = m<QOS = m<POT
and i have to find ROS and QOT
did you get a diagram with this?
nope, i can draw one
yes that might be useful
cuz im still confused on this same question, i got m<ros, im stuck on how to get qot
ping @help and if someone can help you, they will
I hope I did good on my geometry exam
i hope so too!
Lol
the only thing i was confused on was when i use CPCTC
Anyone able to help me find a way to use CPCTC
@drifting wigeon
Ehhhh
......wait a min
Well if ya don't want the answer, fine shrugs
I just want to know when to use CPCTC in a proof @tropic stirrup
The hell even is a cpctc
i think it is short for "Congruent Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent" @tropic stirrup
:disgust:
Basically, you use it after you prove the required, then you get the rest
"congruent things are congruent"
what kind of tautological formalized statement is that
.-.
Idk, we learned it during congruent triangle proofs
It's not used alot, that's the problem
the other 2 what
if you don't do a resolution proof with constructive tarskian geometry can it be called real geometry 🤔
Someone please help me
ok
Okay
So I rotated a triangle clockwise 90 degrees
Do I need to add more marks to it?
Compass marks or something?
I don't know what you're trying to do
if you have grid paper then you don't need to use a compass to rotate 90 degrees
if you used the compass to do the rotation by 90 degrees, then you'd just end up with some compass marks
you don't just add them in after the fact or something
that's why your question is nonsense
Thanks a lot.
lol you're very welcome
Here's another way of saying it
Is there anything I'm missing from this?
Or is it correct with all of its markings and whatnot
There're proof other than paragraphs and 2-column?
2 col needs to die
same lol
when i really dont feel like deriving something, I'll just be like
i claim this:
here's the proof that it works:
gg
Come to think of it, how is 2 col surviving anyways?
Like, aside from school, is there any use for it?
"A particular way of organising a proof using two parallel columns is often used in elementary geometry classes in the United States." Welp
there's not really any use to it
although I suppose it could be useful for those who don't know how to read paragraphs
I recently saw a 2 column proof for solving some topology thing, was funny.
Shoe me
Is this style bad? It has advantages but it seems rowned upon
What does the big U mean?
So like...?
"combination" is a bad way of putting it
but basically the union of two sets A and B is the set of all things that are either in A or in B (or perhaps both)
Aye, many combinations out there. Hard to tell which would be the right one based on just that knowledge.
Like. How would you define union categorically 😈
halp
I don't know anything about geometry
but the last topics of a platform i use to learn math are about geometry
is there any resource you can recommend to learn about geometry?
@green marsh Art Of Problem Solving - Introduction to Geometry
mitch is doing that already :P
has anyone here used the book "plane euclidean geometry" by gardner and bradley?
(sec(a) - tan(a))(sec(a) + tan(a)) = 1, so sec(a) - tan(a) = e^{-x}
thus 2sec(a) = e^x + e^{-x}
=tex \cos(a) = \frac{2}{e^x + e^{-x}}
@rugged moat
try expanding out sin(x+y) and sin(x-y), then dividing the numerator and denominator by cos(x)cos(y)
We haven't learned expanding the ratios yet
ahem?
sin(x+y) = sin(x)cos(y) + cos(x)sin(y)? you can't not have learned that
you... kind of need it here lol
Is there any other method?
don't think so
would it be sin(x)cos(-y)+cos(x)sin(-y) for sin(x-y)?
sure, or you could rewrite that as sin(x)cos(y) - cos(x)sin(y) 😛
since cos is even and sin is odd
Last question: sin^6(A) - cos^6(A)/ sin^2(A) - cos^2(A)
=tex \frac{\sin^6(a) - \cos^6(a)}{\sin^2(a) - \cos^2(a)}
this?
yup
x^3 - y^3 = (x-y)(x^2 + xy + y^2)
but that would result in sin^8 no?
yeah ok soz mb
I get it now
also what's the point of writing \sin if the difference is pretty much nothing?
it looks better
$$\sin=sin$$
=tex a\sin(x) \text{ vs. } a sin(x)
typing sin for me is just faster since negative slash is all the way to the right
I thought it would make sense like
it's usually called a backslash 😛
If the slash is a linear function having a negative slope
I'll call it backslash then
the other slash is accordingly called forward slash when it needs to be distinguished
not just slash?
"slash" is fine but when you need to clarify you can say forward slash
ah
I think i start to realize my mom is waking up soon and I haven't slept that drinking coffee at 20:00 wasn't the greatest idea
and that my grammar is bad
"negative slash" is so genuine
Help plox im stuxk
Stuck*
ABCD has equal sides
We need to calculate AE CE
Pls pls hel0
how can ABCD have equal sides
Wait wut
trapezoid with equal sides= square
at 53 a they want me to explain why the area of the ring net is s/h bigger than the area of the net of the cilinder with h as hight
the two templates are right next the question
<@&286206848099549185>
hello
for the first one
the area of the ring net is like finding the area of rectangle
the width is s
the length is curved but the length is given which is 2 * pi * a
so the area of that net is width * length = 2 * pi * a * s
the area of the cylinder net is simply width * height which is 2 * pi * a * h
the ratio of those areas is simply s/h
alright thanks
no problem uwu
is the area of a sphere with radius r the same as the area of a cylinder with radius r and hight 2r?
<@&286206848099549185>
ah do u know how to find the area of a sphere?
with 4* pi *r^2right?
2 * pi * r * 2r
are they the same?
yes
yay u did it
it felt like a cylinder in this case would have a bigger area than the sphere
true
@upper karma Their asking to prove that the area of a cylinder is equel to the area of the sphere at 58 haha
I guess I now know the answer
halp
nvm
i just learned about hyperbolic trig functions, which is just x^2-y^2=1 , is it possible to get trig function values as they are in hyperbolic functions but for any function?
yeah
but instead of hyperbola, what if i replaced it with any other graph
how to determine the trig functions then?
but arent hyperbolic trig functions related to a hyperbola?
yeah
the unit hyperbola, x^2 - y^2 = 1 can be parametrised by x = cosh(t), y = sinh(t)
wow sneaky, asking in more than one channel at once
lol i am just curious
multitask isnt really good for the brain i heard
humans do better when their focus is on one thing
the same way that the unit circle x^2 + y^2 = 1 can be parametrised by x = cos(t), y = sin(t)
aye
so is there something like a unit triangle
🤔
or unit hexagon
ya just take a regular polygon :P
but they'd probably have to be defined by a limit or by piecewise functions
like if there is a line with angle theta shooting out to infiny right
and where the line touches the triangle, is there any possible way to determine the point of intersection of the line and the shape?
wouldn't that be given from the equation of the shape ;o
same way as the circle and hyperbola
i made something really quick to demonstrate what i mean https://www.desmos.com/calculator/gwojtynqna
the easiest way would just to be to convert the shape to polar coordinates
AOB is isosceles
ya
ye so
i see the 2 theta but hows that the same shape ;o
well i'm about to show you how to reduce the general case to this one
^
OK
the red line here is a diameter
this is what you can do if your 1θ angle contains the center
are u drawing this now?
😮 !!
and this is what you can do if your thing doesn't contain the center
BAC = BAD - CAD
BOC = BOD - COD = 2(BAD - CAD) = 2BAC
makes is sense
That's called 중심각과 원주각의 관계 here :p
how is BOC = 2(BAD-CAD)
BOC = BOD - COD
BOD = BAO + ABO = 2BAD, COD = CAO + ACO = 2CAD
BOC = BOC - COD = 2BAD - 2CAD = 2(BAD - CAD) = 2BAC
1π
in rad?
ofc
AOB=π-2(θ+φ)
squints
then BOD = π-(π-2(θ+φ))=2(θ+φ)
then u can do the same thing for just theta
wait then how do we go back
define "go back"?
you've got the 2(φ+θ) and 2θ angles
now it's obvious that BOC = 2φ
which is what we were trying to prove in the first place
maybe im a little lost on how this picture was drawn in the first place 😮
how does this theorem work
we have the quadrilateral to start?
or do we pick 3 points and the center
what quadrilateral
OABC
ya
we know that ABC doesn't contain O
because we already covered the cases when it does
and we want to show BOC = 2BAC
ohh okay
Hey woog
hello!
hi!
thank you @dark sparrow !!
@tropic stirrup lol those are good names
x'D
so jeongri is the word for theorem
mhm
Triangles in butterfly theorem must be proportional right?
no
just has to be a butterfly
so it can be completely different triangle?
mhm
oy
im slow ok T.T
Because a+b+c
Try and prove the star theorem
ideally in