#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 136 of 1
glgl!
Why did bro gay react 😭
Please stop
what the fuck is this bro
a triangle, a „Trapez“ (german), a thing and a sextagon I think
well let's see, a triangle (3 sides) has no diagonal, a quadrilateral (4 sides) has 1 diagonal, a pentagon (5 sides) has 2 diagonals, and a hexagon (6 sides) has 3 diagonals
based on this pattern, how many diagonals do you think a heptagon (7 sides) has?
what about 8-gon, 100-gons, n-gons?
4
yeah
what about these?
make a structured table with the info mentioned above
sides diagonals
3 ?
4 ?
etc
should make it easier to see the pattern
I understand how to use trig functions like sine and stuff
But like what js that doing to the number
Like when I do sine of a degree angle what is happening to that number
I’m finally learning how to graph sine and cosine
You did it
You're officially the best
We’re u the one who needs help on that
I think of wrong person
bro i am so cooked
i have a math exam and the questions are only gonna be about geometry
i SUCK at geometry💔💔
5 + 6 = 11
area of a square is x²
Is it take sin x / cos x
note when u do this
what can the denominator not be equal to
0
Would that be VA
yes vertical asymptotes when cosx = 0
It goes vertically.
I wonder how can i graph quarter period
yes, every pi away from pi/2
When I checked with desmos
as such
I don’t get the “k”
k is an element of the integers
the asymptotes are periodic
every pi
basically k is just a letter, can be n or others too
the middle symbol is notation for "is an element of"
and the z looking letter represents the set of integers (eg: -1, 9, 0, 5, 13, and such)
Okay
What happens if i get sin(x-pi)
i dont understand what this means
I learned their general form of y=a*sin/cos x
u mean for like tangent?
tangent is sin/cosx i mean i guess u could include a though that would make it not the parent function
ur shifting the parent function
like
ssay you have at pi/2
2sin(pi/2)+3
sin(pi/2)=1
2(1)+3
you apply the vertical dilation before the verticcal shift
idk we never did it step by step in my class but i assume thats what this means
i mean i jus think the midline is at 3 and it goes 2 up and 2 below that number
and it should follow the same wave pattern as parent sine function because no period changes
How do people even calculate sin by hand that sounds super cool
usually it's memorization for specific angles or taylor approximations
memorising
There’s like a unit circle
Just go memorize it
It gives all trig functions and their inverses
Coordinate
(Cos x, sin x)
ye and uhh it applies for every fu nction if you know the correlation between them
wait thats a weird way to word it
mb
also addition, subtraction, and double angle formulas for the non calculus ways
interesting, I forgot about the double angle formulas
ye... i barely remember them but i gotta study them cs i got a final tmrw
ty
it shoulddd be light
mcq and then two frq's tues
then two frq on wednesday (short period), then more mcq on friday
Anyway where would frequency appear on sine function and cosine function
If you have an equation like $y=Asin(Bx-C)+D,$ then the period is $\frac{2\pi}{|B|}.$
It's the same for cosine as well
OGMath_789
yes
so what's the function
can you clarify what you mean by finding patterns? do you mean ordered points?
ok, so the period in this case would still be $2\pi.$
OGMath_789
It’s for the quadrantal angles
0, pi/2, pi, 3pi/2, and 2pi
Like this
Then I found this
Btw I forgot “n” in pattern
yep the table of values for cos x is right
Thanks
Anyways
Their midline is -4
Also for this one, you can simply draw the graph of y=sin(x) and shift it 4 units down
yea trig is not that hard
Btw last unit on bearings I got 102
I was shocked
nice
60
ye graphing trig is pretty straightfoward, find characteristics and such
Don’t laugh at my artwork
They also have bonus 2 points
it's okay, don't worry, good luck on your next tests!
I got 0.5 off out of 60
It’s out of 60 btw
sine should start at the midline
Yea
Like this
amplitude is 1, period is 2pi, and quarter point is pi/2
*amplitude is 1
Is that correct
amplitude cannot be 0
Or that’s a straight line
my teacher never made us find "quarter points" but period is right i assume quarter point is too
It’s something over 4
The period/4
i assume its meant to help u space out the points where sine hits midline, max, min
Like getting spaced outside or closed together
do you mean horizontally or vertically
Oh it’s a dilation
Yes
im asking a this or that question
Vertically
is it a horizontal or vertical dilation
right
It’s vertical dilation
Will the space and spaced out or will it spaced in
Now i see this
a=2
mmhm
Goes up 3 units
right
Midline is y=3
I mean y=3
right
mhm
My teacher said cosine graph is like a cup
uhh kinda igs
What’s igs
Okay
If i get this in one day
I would be good for the whole unit
Is that correct
It would be piece of cake
Is it SOHCAHTOA
no
But in a graph
no
What’s that about
u can search up
frq 3 ap precalc for examples
eg: a ferris wheel goes up and down
and moves closer and away rom a fixed point
or somethin
Omg that’s familiar
What I’m doing
Is it take the info that’s given and graph them
we did this one on a worksheet
Using sin and cos
Yea
That’s familiar
But in my case the equation is given and i just need to graph it
Question 1 of the FRQ is worth 2 points, provide the x and y values of F G H J K which make up one cycle of the graph
Question 2 of the FRQ is worth 2 points, provide the values of a b c and d in the form asin(b(x+c))+d or the same thing with cosine
Question 3 and 4 are one point each, where you analyze an interval between two of the points say G and H (positive/neg, inc/dec make four options) then analyze the same interval's rate of change (inc/dec using concavity)
So that's the trig modeling we learned
Okay
have been for a week
Okay
just got finals and ap exam left
Have u done bearings
Okay
Trig modeling in my works is
Take a Ferris wheel and make them into waves and explain them
mm
What do u think what would this look like
7?
unsure what they mean by graph in seconds because the period is not a integer
How would the b in y=a*sin(bx)
Okay
Does it shrink
ye
rough sketch
ye 2 is 'B"
Oh it gets wider
Okay
My idea was set the inside equals to the y value on the unit circle
Like i had the pattern 0,1,0,-1,0
Then is it
0, 1/2, 0, -1/2, 0
Do we just leave it alone
where you had (pi/2, 1) before, you now have (pi/4,1)
because when u plug in sin(pi/4*2) u get sin(pi/2)
Okay
Like i have 0, pi/2, pi, 3pi/2, and 2pi
Would it be 0, pi/4, 2pi, 3pi, and 4pi?
im not sure how you got the last values
Oh divide by 2
pi/4, pi/2, 3pi/4, pi are the x values
ye
I wonder what will happen if we get y= sin(-2x)
Would we move the - out making it y=-sin(2x)
reflect across y axis
absolutely not-
DONT overcomplicate trig functions
Ok
this would be exactly the same as y=f(-x)
Ohh
mmhm
thats what we call a period shift
Guys i need help for this question, tysm
tsuitachi (tuitati)
- mark G at BC so DG perpendicular with BC, or use the above formula
- find angle DCG such that ang. DCG=BCD=CBF
- find angle CBF from BCF triangle
- find angle EBF (that is just 90deg-CBF)
- find EF via cosine law (with length BE and length BF)
Hey for cosine graph where would the period be
Would it be the inside of y=a*cos(bx)
The period of $\cos(x)$ is $2\pi$, so the period of $\cos(bx)$ is $\frac{2\pi}{\left \lvert b \right \rvert}$. $a$ does not contribute to the period since it only dictates the vertical stretch/compression factor.
Civil Service Pigeon
or -4. Though it doesn't really matter since the cosine function is even.
I made this equation
y=3 cos (4x) -1
amplitude = 3
period = pi/2
midline: y=-1
Would that pass (0,2)
also the midline is a line, so saying "-1" in isolation does not make sense
So if the inside is 4
With the radians everything multiplies by 1/4
With whole it’s by 4
hi guys
im having some trouble with geometry
i have 4 shapes rectangle square rhombus and parallelogram
there are some theorems regarding provingthat diagonalys bisect each other, bisect each other at right angles
proving opposite sides and angles are equal/parallel
and im kinda having trouble understanding them
chatgpt doesnt rlly help
i js want some guidance 🙏
5x+10+10x+20+60=180
without neeing to do all of that
10?
mmhm
So it’s
120=(10x+20)+(5x+10)
Combined liked terms
120=15x+30
120=15(x+2)
8=x+2
6=x
The last one i did used traversal rule
is really most of the work
What was the one that looks like “F”
Like this ignore the watermark
um
Look upside down
It’s a “F” shape
But I forgot what’s the theorem called
What should i say next time
idk its not really a shape
Like transversal looks like a “z”
Yea yea yea
So it’s angle 1 = angle 2
6x+10=5x+20
x=10
Easy
10 degrees
That’s an acute i think
Or obtuse angle
Ik it’s something less than 90 degrees, 90 degrees, and more than 90 degrees
accute less than 90
90 is right
moer than 90 is obtuse
Okay
So that’s an acute angle
ye
Bc it’s 70 degrees
According that that theorem
I can plug x value to angle one or two
It will be the same
ye
Theory would it be possible to find every INTEGER sin value using only sin(1) , sin(89) , the double angle sin rule and this expansion
Oh that didn’t
use (1/2)xy=84
a. plug in the x and y as what you got asked for (remember sec=1/cos) and see if final result is 84. point a is independent from point b and c bcos it's just "what if".
b. substitute y as 31-x so you get smth like quadratic roots thing
c. find the 2 quantities in terms of x or y, ig?
can someone help 🥹 i can't distinguish the difference between the letters for sin cos tan regardless any triangless
im stuck
Were you taught SOH CAH TOA?
yea i got taught that
but like im not sure like whats the differnece between those letters and for SIN COS TAN
😭
R or T
Oh!
So R and T are your angles. O means opposite, a means adjacent, h means hypotenuse (side across from the right angle)
Adjacent means the side that’s touching the angle that is NOT the hypotenuse, opposite is the only side that isn’t touching the angle
So for angle R, side length 15 is opposite
For angle T, however, opposite is side 36
Does allat make sense?
so based on the position ur standing on the angle it's different right?
liike LOL i can do for R but T wth
kind of
Yeah
So for T, the hypotenuse stays the same
What side is touching angle T that isn’t the hypotenuse?
HELP WHAT
im trying to roate the paper hella
is it even 15 or 36 im CRINE
Welllll it’s not 39
Two sides are next to T. One is the hypotenuse, the other is your “adjacent”
wait so like i have to imagine myself standing at that specific angle and mirror the adjacent/opposite/hyp based on the position
😭
Hyp js means the longest side
noted
Uhh can someone help me see if this proof is valid
This image as a whole is very hard to read, but this quadrilateral is definitely not a parallelogram.
I stopped reading here
Uh I can type it if you want
Uh yeah I meant to say a quadrilateral, a shape with 4 Sid's basically
Let angle ABC be x.
Let angle ADC be y.
Let a line be constructed from point d to b, forming a DB and creating 2 triangles from the quadrilateral.
In triangle ADB, DA isn't equal to AB, AD > AB, so angle ABD > ADB
In triangle CBD, DC isn't equal to BC, DC > BC so angle CBD > CDB
So, both CBD and ABD that make up angle x are greater than in measure angle CDB and ADB which make up y.
x > y #
looks good to me 
low cortisol hand writing 😭
First that isn’t geometry, second read the rules, third read the rules
Mb I’ll put it in alg, may I ask what I did wrong other than send a question in the wrong topic?
Yeah you’re not supposed to ping helpers unless you have a help channel open
Oh I’m sorry about that thank you for letting me know
Can someone help me with 14a?
1/sqrt2 = sqrt2/2... so its asking, what angle outputs a sine value of sqrt2/2?
it really comes down to just memorization and if u can associate the angle outputs with its respective part
welll
you could ah
draw a triangle
sine is opposite / hypotenuse
so 1 would be a leg
sqrt2 would be hypotenuse
thru pythag theorem, the other leg is also1
then u could recognize its a 45-45-90 triangle, so theta must be 45deg = pi/4 radians
its basically js solving sin(x) = 1/sqrt(2)
thats what an inverse function is
I really don't know how many times do I have to repeat this in EVERY channel, but do NOT ping helpers here.
It may be allowed but its not good practise.
ots just inverse functions, for example if sin 30 equals 1/2 then inverse sin of 1/2 is 30 degrees
Thank u guys
👍
well i wanna review geometry once again
is it really that bad😭 cause thats like one of my proofs with hte best handwriting how does my teacher read it😭
i mean itd not THAT bad compared to some of the ones ive seen but still, i dont get how teachers read those 😔
You are doing good. Just improve a bit more so the teacher does not reduce your marks like mine did
frrr
they reduce marks for handwriting??
mine did idk about yours
I mean, if you do give me time I can write very beutifully
thats crazy
But you really need to improve your handwriting
well i could try
Handwriting is fine tho. imo
(I have seen worse 💀)
doctor's handwriting?
No.
4 AM mathematician handwriting
Genuine flow state
How did my teacher get 4•4•4 can someone explain and where did the root go
whats the original problem
The height of a four sided pyramid is 3cm the sharp edges are 5cm find its area
I think I translated it right
If the interior angles of a triangle ABC satisfy the equality,
sin^2 A + sin^2 B + sin^2 C = 2(cos^2 A + cos^2 B + cos^2 C),
prove that the triangle must have a right angle.
Help pls
Reposted here: #help-12 message
Any tips on how to do this?
In the future, please show what you've done so far when asking for help along with any other relevant context — it gives us more to work with and saves time from explaining things unnecessarily. \
\begin{parts}
\part Note that $|z|$ represents the distance from a point to the origin in the complex plane. So, $1 \leq |z| \leq 2$ represents all points whose distance from the origin is between $1$ and $2$ (both inclusive). This means you should be shading two solid concentric circles (why?), I'll let you fill in the rest yourself.
\part I'd convert this to Cartesian first. Letting $z=x+iy$ (for $x$, $y \in \mathbb{R}$) yields
$$\sqrt{x^2+y^2}=2\sqrt{(x-3)^2+y^2}.$$
Some algebra bashing should again yield the equation of a circle.
\end{parts}

texit?
Civil Service Pigeon
welp a bit delayed but we got there eventually 
in terms of math and trig in general does anyone have comprehensive tips or strategies to study math because the approach is different than how you would study for other classes. if so please help me because i’m struggling learning trig identities and also not reaching the mastery i want in my current trig class. thank you!
understand the concept
if in doubt, ask
do you have any worksheets with you at the moment?
I do yes
are geometry formulæ, especially for compound shapes, bound to look not so simple?
For the trig identities now, I memorized all the formulas and know I need more practice problem repping to build the pattern recognition. But in general trig like cos sin tan graphing, unit circle stuff, i want complete mastery but I’m still getting B+ on tests after studying 7 days before a test and it’s frustrating
like, look at circle sector's perimeter\
$P=(\theta+2)r$
tsuitachi (tuitati)
Reposted here: #help-7|zen1thxyz message
guys please help
im stuck on math rn
for some reason i cant figure out how to find the area of a pentagon
by making the small triangles
nvm
guys wish me luck
i give up on circles
ill figure it out tmr pre test
or cheat somehow
idk
i dont like to cheat but id rather cheat than get a bad grade
gn guys
im going to bed
@rancid flint , this is what i did
and obviously there are multiple ways to solve this
proof by contradiction can also be thought of here ig
Snke game
Ok, thanks for helping
Lmaooo
are numbers eligible in "classical" geometry just π, positive and negative sqrt(Q), and combination of these under +,-,×,÷?
In compass-and-straightedge compass geometry, the valid lengths are called constructible numbers. It can be shown that these are the numbers formed strting from integers using addition/subtraction/multiplication/division/extraction of nested square roots. So numbers like sqrt(3+sqrt(5)) are constructible. Also, pi is not constructible (note this relates to why squaring the circle is considered impossible).
I think it's a bit more subtle than that, because even if we cannot construct a length of pi, geometry is still supposed to work if we're given such a length by an oracle. So it's not really a strict dichotomy between "valid" and "invaid" numbers.
In particular, if we're given a length of 2pi, it ought to be geometrically true that the sum of sides in any incribed polygon in the circle is smaller than that, and the total length of any curcumscribed polygon is longer. So in that sense the property "this line segment has length 2pi" has geometric content -- even if the axioms don't allow us to prove that something with the property exists, it still might.
sin^2 is the derivative
phobos
there are no derivatives here
What about sin = cos
I hate to ask this but does anyone have a study guide or a website that has all the terms and stuff for high school geometry? I want to study for finals but I kind of goofed off for the first half of the year and my book is useless without a teacher in the room, anything is appreciated
Khan acedemy
What grade are you
10th
will do
interesting
I've been somewhat nerd-sniped by the following seemingly basic problem recently and I can't tell whether I'm just bad at geometry or if it's much harder than it looks:
Suppose you've got three interior-disjoint unit squares on the plane (not necessarily axis aligned). What is the minimum perimeter of the triangle formed by their enters?
If the squares are axis aligned (or just all share the same rotation) the answer is trivially 1 + sqrt(5). (Achieved by putting two squares touching eachother and stacking the third symmetrically between them on top).
The configuration where two squares have one corner touching and the the other is shoved in between them with a corner poking between is always strictly worse than this.
But I can't seem to figure out a good argument that the general case should always be >= 1 + sqrt(5). I assume there's some neat argument about how you can always replace a configuration with a better one if it doesn't look like this, but I'm not seeing it.
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/qvlt7xzjw7 what's up! I made geometric sin(sin(a)) in desmos.
I basically just took sin(a) from the unit circle then put that length as an arc on the circle so that I can turn it into an angle using radians because sin expects an angle.
It's a very simple idea but I can't find anything on it
find the parametrization of y=sin(sinx) frfr
wow sin(sinx) looks really close to sinx
also kinda the reason we do sintheta~=theta in calculations for the period
of a simpel pendulum
Can someone tell me what does sin= what does tan= and what does cos=
sin,cos,tan are functions
You mean sin equal perp over hyp?
Oh so these r jst different terms
The way i learnt what these equals is by memorizing" some people have curly brown hair that play basket ball"
Take the first letter of those words from this sentence
Sin equals Perp /hyp
Cos equals Base/Hyp
Tan equals perp /Base
Btw perpendicular(opp) and base (adj)
most places use
soh cah toa
Ye that works too
Ig most countries have their own ways
I heard sm indian guy had another acronym as well
I forgot that
acronyms are pure memorization
Thx
yes
Yes
More than enough
I haven't really looked into pendulums, I have done very little physics so far. I'm going to do physics for my leaving cert though.
Leaving cert is like the 10th-12th grade equivalent to other countries in Ireland
in australia we use SOH CAH TOA
where
sin = opp/hyp
cos = adj/hyp
tan = opp/adj
which makes sense cuz tan = sin/cos
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/mvzq9yzdmw you can repeat it too
I just had a thought, what would sin(sin(sin(sin...(1))) approach? Does it approach 0???
yep, it approaches 0 as sqrt(3/n), where n is a number of iterations
They look like they might converge asymptotically, though.
I don't know whether it's actually true, but plotting just the five first points won't be able to show that is isn't.
Oh I guess I misunderstood something.
I thought he meant f(x)=sin(f(x-1)) f(x)=√(3/x)
It's asymptotics, namely, if a(n+1)=sin(a(n)), then a(n)/sqrt(3/n) -> 1
But I guess that doesn't make sense because that would mean you could express sin using simple operations
you can find proof here https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4129806/limit-of-infinite-composition-of-sinx
I tried it out numerically (up to 20,000 iterations) and it does seem to approach sqrt(3/n) asymptotically ... no matter where between 0 and pi I start the iteration.
you probably did something wrong.
What is asymptotically? Is it like they never cross as it goes down the asymptote?
it's this #geometry-and-trigonometry message
it approaches 0 regardless of input
because fixed points
Where did you get √(3/n) ?
Um, why? Starting the iteration at a different place would just shift the iterated sequence a constant amount to the left or right, so it's not unreasonable that this would not change the asymptotics, especially since the logarithmic derivative of sqrt(3/x) goes to 0.
I've given the link to the proof
say
the equation is
sin(sin(sin....()))))))...)))
now
as
sin(sin(sin....()))))))...)))=sin(sin(sin....()))))))...)))
and since we repeat it infinitely let y=sin(sin(sin....()))))))...)))
so
we see
sin(y)=y
solving this we get y=0
so th einfinite sines go to 0
oh is it solved
im stupid
no, this doesn't prrove that it is exactly zero
true yeas
I'm not really educated enough to even really follow the proof
(I see the same asymptotics numerically by iterating x-x³/6 instead of sine, so it's not really a trigonometric property).
So I guess I'll have to leave this be
Experimentally it looks like iterating x-ax³+o(x³) always ends up going like sqrt(1/(2an)) -- for starting points that end up converging to 0 from above at all.
This is a correct argument that if the iteration converges to anything, the limit must be 0. It doesn't in and of itself show that it does converge.
yes , my apologies
im js leaning ts stuff
Not something you need to apologize for.
No.
Ever close to being one?
No, didn't do competitive math when I was of HS age.
Why is this?
because
this
id say
Oohh
because the substitution assumes the limit convergess to somme y
what if its infinity thats the problem
I've seen those cool substitutions like the x=√(2√(2√...)) x=√(2x) but didn't know there was a catch
That makes sense
yep theres always a catch
Depending on which function you're iterating, it's also possible that it neither converges nor escapes to infinity. A famous example is iterating 4x(1-x) from a point between 0 and 1. Most starting points in that interval lead to a sequence that keeps jumping around chaotically in the unit interval.
oh yeah true
but say x=0
right
most
not al
Wait what??? Could you expand on that expression a bit
There are infinitely many starting points where the sequence ends up at either 0 or 3/4 exactly (and then stays there for ever), but there are even more infinitely many starting points that don't.
also there are unstable fixed points right like x=1
for x^2?
What is an unstable fixed point?
Ye same thing tho
I use these terms when necessary otherwise we jst use perp base hyp
start from x=0.999
we repeatedly apply x^2 to it we get
that 0.999^k
which decays to 0
if we say x=1.001
we get 1.001^n
which goes to infinity
so anything not like +1 of -1 blows up to infinity or goes to 0
thats unstable
ig
mr trop might have a real explanation
Wouldn't that just mean it's a fixed point?
its fixed but like anything even close to it goes away
It's one of the standard examples in chaos theory. The function 4x(1-x) itself is a parabola with x-intercepts at (0,0) and (1,0) and vertex at (½,1), so it maps [0,1] surjectively to itself.
@hollow hound
Wouldn't this be true for most fixed points?
(sorry if its a stupid question)
well i never said anything about number of fixed points that do this and no of em that do that
also i dont think so
For smooth functions is depends on the absolute value of the derivative at the fixed point. If it's less than 1 it is stable; if it's more than 1 it is unstable.
(And if the derivative is ±1 a more careful analysis is needed. It might be stable but the convergence will be slow, as in the case of the sine).
dont we check the modulus of the derivative
also im sorry but arent f'=1 like neutral points?
For example for sin(x) like we started with, the fixed point has f'(x)=1 -- it still attacts, but slowly.
oh
On the other hand tan(x) has the same fixed point with the same derivative, but it is unstable.
i see
2d shape nomenclature discussions go here also?
or is it actually a kinda useless topic for #geometry-and-trigonometry
and 3d also btw
I meant that you first have to prove that the limit exist. But in this case it is easy. Since iterated sines make a decreasing sequence sin(a)<a and the sequence is bounded by 0 from below (in case you start from some a0, for which sin(a0)>=0), then it has a limit. And for that limit a, you should have sin(a)=a, which means a=0.
I think this code in Python shows fairly well that iterated sines are asymptotically equivalent to sqrt(3/n), as it gives 0.999233170242103
from math import sqrt, sin x = 3 N = 100_000 for n in range(1,N+1): x = sin(x) print(x/sqrt(3/N))
So we're in agreement?
oh, yes. I first read your message as '...it doesn't seem to approach' :)) Sorry.
<@&268886789983436800>
<@&268886789983436800>
I was playing around with kth iteration of f(x) and changing around the values when I found this interesting thing that converges pretty quick to some value https://www.desmos.com/calculator/p7qk0udoqf
Another number pops up if you reverse the order of cos and sin
Can these numbers be expressed using some constants like pi I wonder
I think that's unlikely.
Though for real fast convergence, try iterating x -> x + cos(x)
I'm trying to find trig identities on my own, can someone help me understand if these are correct? I was looking at a unit circle that I made to try and see the relations between these two basic trigonometric functions.
Next to last seems to be a typo; the others check out as far as I can se.
Congrats on developing some intuition instead of just taking the identities on faith!
Whops also the No, that was just Discord cropping it badly.cos(t) = -cos(-t) must be a typo.
Thank you
sin(45)=sin(135) though, no?
And sin(-45)=sin(-135)
Yeah, but that's a pretty special case.
You don't have sin(0°) = sin(90°), for example.
Ohhhh, thanks!
Yeah my mistake, any one counterexample means that it's not an identity
I guess I got lucky for the other ones then because I was only using 45 for reference?
Tysm
These relations are so beautiful to me 
yeah, 45° is an unlucky choice of main example because sin(45°)=cos(45°).
Yep
Are there plenty more btw if you don't mind me asking
I tried to look at the pinned images for identities similar to the ones I've been finding but there are only a few in the image that look similar to this and some of the ones I found aren't in the images
Also I think that the ones I found can also be true for different multiplicities of for example pi right?
like cos(theta)=-cos(theta+pi*n)?
That was indeed the goal of the instructor on Khan Academy that led me to attempting this to begin with! I'm really glad I learned a lot and that I didn't rush moving onto the next lessons without having the intuition that I have now.
That is only true when n is odd.
Right!!
I didn't realize that
so maybe 3n?
or a sidenote saying only when n is odd when writing the equation?
What what one usually does is write an arbitrary odd number as something like "2n+1", so we can say
$$\cos(\theta) = -\cos(\theta+(2n+1)\pi)$$
Troposphere
Oh, ok! that makes sense
Typically one wouldn't bother with writing down all of those variants, since they can be derived as needed by combining one of your base identities with cos(x) = cos(x+k·2pi) and/or sin(x) = sin(x+k·2pi).
But it's definitely good for learning to have thought of them explicitly.
Thanks!
One can also be super-fancy and write $$\cos(\theta+n\pi) = (-1)^n \cos(\theta).$$
(But that's more of a party trick, though one can probably think up some cases where it would be useful).
Troposphere
Ooo interesting!
So the reason I don't see some of the ones I discovered in the pinned images in this channel is because you can derive them when needed and the main ones are more important?
like this
ah in the image it says "relatively small list of trigonometric identities," I don't assume that a student would be looking for the ones I discovered as opposed to these ones which are in normal curriculum
Yeah, there's an almost infinite supply of variants, and it only makes sense to remember so many of them.
That doesn't mean your time coming up with the variants is lost; that's exactly the kind of practice that will enable you to think them up again later.
Omg there are so many here, and I think I saw some of the ones that I found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identities
In trigonometry, trigonometric identities are equalities that involve trigonometric functions and are true for every value of the occurring variables for which both sides of the equality are defined. Geometrically, these are identities involving certain functions of one or more angles. They are distinct from triangle identities, which are identi...
Tysm! I see
that's wonderful

hi
hi
What is sin and cos
Math vocabulary hurts my brain sometimes
And right now this is one of those times
If it hurts your brain to see people talking about concepts you haven't yet been introduced to, math might not be an ideal hobby for you.
(its a joke)
so sine and cosine are just functions
specifically, periodic ones, which means their values repeat
this can be used, most typically in triangles, to look at ratios
(as opposed to capricious and arbitrary functions)
w-what are those e.e
the ones that aren't just.
all ik are transcedental functions, algebraic functions, and periodic..
so, say you have a triangle. specifically, a right triangle.
Alr
I know about hypotenuse
now, say you have the measurement of angle D
the side a is "adjacent" to it, side b is "opposite" to it, and the hypotenuse is just... the hypotenuse
so, the sine ratio tells us that sine(D) will be the opposite side over the hypotenuse side
or, essentially, b/c
and lets say we know the hypotenuse is 2
so sin(D)=b/2
now, we can rearrange this to 2sin(D)=b
we could then plug this in to a calculator to find the side length b
for cosine, you have the similar ratio adjacent/hypotenuse
By 2sin you mean as 2 x sin correct?
2 times sin(D)
so, sine and cosine basically allow us to work with ratios of sides and angles of right triangles (and non right, but i don't think its appropriate to explain the unit circle to you at your level of geometry that i've gleaned)
Oh I think I get it now.
If a triangle has 3 sides, 4cm 3cm and 5cm. Like in your example, let’s say there is also an angle D and E.
Let’s say this:
3cm is the opposite
4cm is the adjacent
5cm is the hypotenuse
Sin is going to be 0.6 correct?
right!
Cos is 0.8 as well im pretty sure
yup
Do keep in mind that with a different angle, the sides would switch relationships (with angle E, the opposite side becomes adjacent and vice versa)
Yeah I now that
Lowk never been this invested in math
I’ve always been more a history person
But no need for Americas got talent sad backstorys
mm ic... not for everyone
I discovered something while drawing a sphere.
You can represent a sinusoidal wave as the x-axis. Cosinusoidal wave as the y-axis and Tangential wave as the z-axis.
This can be used to split the EM wave into two waves and show the EM wave as an x-axis wave and a y-axis wave.
E(t) becomes a y-axis wave. M(t) becomes an x-axis wave.
would steradian number stuffs also a topic here?
I guess so, yeah
fellas do you have any practice problems for trig equations? and like geometry proofs in 2d and 3d
🎁
Civil Service Pigeon
aight gimme like 2 hours
||wait, CD is not a diameter...||
also idk if this counts but there's this "heptagon miracle" that says
for a regular heptagon ABCDEFG, 1/s = 1/t + 1/u (or so the saying goes), i forgot which line segments corresponds to s, t, and u (iirc these are AB, AC, and AD)
perhaps if this isn't familiar to you yet, you might be interested to prove or disprove this thing
anyways i think uh
first draw a line parallel to af on e labeled g
below e
so ae = fg and eg = af
oh wait cd is a chord not a diameter
it follows from the similarity of ADF and CAF and from the fact that the ratio of areas of ACB and ABD (which are right triangles) equals EC/ED.
Hey does anyone remember the construction for the geometric mean of two segments?
you can use this
Well I mean only using a compass and a ruler, construct a segment equal to the geometric mean of two segments
that's exactly this
. Just draw a circle with the diameter a+b. Then draw a hight till it intersect the circle
I thought the height had to be the P.bs of the two segments tho
As you can see from the diagram, the hight should be perpendicular at the point where two segments meet.
Ohh yeah I think i was confused bc you have to get perpendicular bisector so you can find the center of the circle
yes, to find the center you need Pbs
i overlooked the fact that ABD is a right triangle, damn
🤦♂️
via "double angle theorem" and the fact that AB line segment is a secret angle AOB that is 180°
Hii I need help
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
Well you can measure the distance between two points you can search for the formula online
That way you got triangle CAB
Can someone make a graph that has A to B, B to C, and C to A also to the primes
i dont think my math english is good enough to comprehend what your asking for
I mean to say I want 3 equations
Like what’s the equation from (1,-1) and (3,2)
Yea
No I’m just want to know
So you dont know how to find that linear equation that represents the line connecting the two points?
Ik it but I wonder if u can
Yeah I know how
Sure
I already learned analytic geometry
I get A to B; y=3/2 x - 5/2,B to C; y=6x+20, and A to C; y=-x
Im too lazy to find it
Understandable
Good news is from C’ to C is y=x
what would the transformation rule be for reflecting over a line like y=(1/3)x - 4
The slope would be the same
Hmm
All points are same distance to the line of reflection
for example im trying to prove triangles congruent with transformation
points are:
T(-2, 6)
S(-1, 2)
R(2, 3)
L(7, -5)
M(6, -2)
N(9, -1)
so im trying to get TSR to LMN so i first did a translation <7, -4>
and im pretty sure reflecting over y = 1/3x - 4 gets T'(5, 1) to L(7, -5) but i dont know how to check
S' and R' already ended up in the spots I wanted them to
If you want to reflect $P$ over $\ell$ to obtain $P’$, then draw the perpendicular to $\ell$ through $P$. Suppose this line meets $\ell$ at $Q$. Then, $Q$ is the midpoint of $\overline{PP’}$.
Civil Service Pigeon
,w reflect (5,1) over y=(1/3)x-4

yo what
,w ((4x+3(y+4))/5, (3x-4(y+9))/5), x=5, y=1
Checks out
bet thanks

how do I solve these two?
ok i was able to solve the pyramid one but not the other one
what have you tried
Note that all the sides are all rectangles.
hello can i have some help with trigonometry like i understand sin cos and tan but idk where to use for example sin-() idk
oh i meant like the two sin i dont know where to use them
but i do understand the basic of it
Yk what sin an angle means so
So sin unknown angle = 6/7
To find the angle
Sin -1 6/7 = unknown angle
tyy
use the fact that the angles A and C are equal
Ik segment AE Is 6 according to 6-8-10 triples
you don't need that
Meant to do 25-6=19
Segment AB is also 25
x=20
Can we make segment BC 10
Since we can bring down that triangle and forms a rectangle
it's a parallelogramm. So, its opposite sides are always equal
This can also be solved using the concept of vector product
how can i determine if the vector/point thing is going in a cw/ccw direction relative to the red center
i think its really simple but i'm not getting it
cross product 
though if you treat the red dot as the centre of a clock, then the purple is pointing in the direction that the hands would move
meaning that it's going clockwise
@vestal basin
sweeping?
edited (kind of, the meaning is the same)
6
Let A denote the swipe vector, and B the vector from the start of the swipe to the center of the screen. You can then calculate the determinant of the components of A and B:
| A.x A.y |
| B.x B.y |= A.x * B.y - B.x * A.y
The sign of the determinant will tell you whether B points to the right side or to the left side of A.
i saw this on stack overflow but i dont quite get why it works (?) or what it means
yeah this is basically what I said earlier about the cross product
take the 2D screen as a flat plane in 3D space by setting z=0
why does cross product work 😭
then taking the cross product of the purple vector and the vector to the centre creates a theoretical 3D vector that points either into or out of the screen (along the z-axis)
this is just the magnitude of that vector
and you can use the sign of that z value to determine whether the motion is clockwise or counterclockwise around the centre point
because of the right hand rule
i cccc thanks

ok i lied
theres actually a surface normal that must be taken into account
its like kinda weird because its 3d in a 2d projection
so basically the orange normal is pointing left
when i move the orange face using the white/blue sides, the direction is OPPOSITE to what would be intuitive
but the face opposite to orange works correctly
so i suspect its because the surface normal is the opposite direction
but how would i account for this
its not like i can hard code it
what is it
Got a question from my sister, suppose triangle ABC right at A, with AB > AC. Let AH cut BC, such that AH perpendicular to BC. From AC, let I be the midpoint, and let IN perpendicular to BC. We want to show AB^2 = NB^2 - NC^2.
I solved it using Pythagorean, but is there a more efficient way to solve?
Sounds a tad silly, innit?
I believe that you should be able to multiply the result of your 2D cross-product by the sign of the $z$-component of the face's 3D surface normal in the camera space. The faces on opposite sides of the cube point in opposite directions relative to the camera, so the $z$-values of their normals will have opposing signs. Multiplying by this sign flips the counterclockwise/counter-clockwise result for those "mirrored" faces:
$$\operatorname{sgn} \left(\begin{vmatrix} A_x & A_y \ B_x & B_y \end{vmatrix} \right) \cdot \operatorname{sgn}(n_z)$$
Civil Service Pigeon
I never thought about it but how do we know that side a will increase in length as theta approaches 90?
just think of it like a ladder on a wall and push the end toward the wall
Well yeah I can imagine that but
Thats not math
ok how
i cant think of how like trigonometricaly angle theta increasing would make side a increase
like ok tan = opp/hyp
so hyp * tan = opp
you are decreasing one side and increasing the other side
no we arent
just think of it like a ladder on a wall and push the end toward the wall
does the ladder change length
ok ok ok hold on i think you misunderstood
imagine that point a going upward indefinitely
that'd make theta approach 90
but then why would theta approaching 90 make the point go upward
like why is the converse true
do you not see how that is equivalent to just pushing the ladder toward the wall
it's a similar triangle
it's a similar triangle
is there some relationship or
similar to what other triangle?
the triangle you described by pulling A up and the triangle i described by pushing theta towards the wall a
yeah that latter example was never what i was talking about
but its the same thing
how?
Oh yeah i can imagine that
but how
sorry if im being too euclidean
Actually ok wait
speaking of triangle stuff
ok let's say you pull A up until theta = x
i push theta toward the wall until theta = x
by ASA they are similar triangles
the opposite side to the smallest angle in a triangle is always the smallest side
ok
if I increase theta then the other complimentary acute angle will decrease
Thus the side adjacent to theta will graudally be the smallest in the triangle relative to the other sides
and so the side opposite to theta a increases as theta increases
is that math enough?
Intuitively that theta angle is connected to 2 points, if one point stays unchanged, the other going upward, then the angle theta must approach 90.
I wish I cared about maths during my teens
I've been thinking of something related to this and this actually helped me get something down I was thinking about for over a year
Reposted here: #help-7|zen1thxyz message
Can anyone teach me some topics? Vectors matrices, construction, circle theorem, got a test tomorrow
