#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 121 of 1
your fine I should be sorry 😭
How to do trig prove qs
Manipulate algebraically until the expression is simplified on both sides
And make sure the equality stands
convert ratios into sin and cos, it works 90% of the time
rate my geo notes (triangle parts)
there is a quite stupid mistake in the proof of the first area thingy but the diagram should make the plan clear enough
Bro that book looks cute
big fat notebook series
it contains pre-algebra and algebra, geometry, and algebra 2 along with books that explain and practice books
Hey everyone I have a acuplacer test for college so I can take my other classes but it’s the only thing holding me back from being able to take my other classes and I was wondering if anyone had any resources and etc on these topics
I have some pdfs on linear equations (affin geometry), linear aplications and geometry
however i dont have them in english, maybe you can translate them , idk how
Why language is it in ?
spanish
its nothing
so you want them?
nevermind
i just remembered a better source
you should be fine with that
Thank you sm 🙌
😂😂😂
Nerdyasianguy
Nvm got it
so basically idk
Just to be sure this is just inscribed angles right?
and then to finish, once you have angle ADC ||just use the alternate segment theorem||
in a level further maths vectors, is there a way to like understand it intuitively rather than memorising a method for the like 8 different types of questions they can ask?
from another server:
the point of practice is not to memorize solutions, but the understand them enough so you know when to use which approach/technique
after solving a problem:
check your work
make the most of every problem and really understand each problem
identify keywords or indications on which approaches to use
record patterns you observe repeatedly in a notebook, refer to it when stuck
if you were not able to get the answer in one go
-- identify where and why you went astray
-- ensure you understand why certain steps were taken (eg in probability, a multiplication could be independent events or conditional events. make sure you can identify it when unprompted by the question)
if you were able to get the answer in one go
-- redo problem but instead change what to solve for. eg you are given a, b, and you find c; try problem with b, c and solve for a
if the question appears frequently, each time you do it, aim for shorter time and higher accuracy
How can I look up a triangle's center name just from its construction?
Wdym
You can identify a triangle center by matching its construction to the known families of classical concurrence points.
Looks amazing!!
Did you scan the image? all looks like digital but also in paper way, i don't know how to explain it in a fluid way hehe
I say it looks great, everything, the order, info
can anybody help explain binomial expansion/theorem to me
Hi can someone help me with this please?
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
I think it’s 40 but the more I think about the more I think it’s wrong
Try to use the concept of cyclic quadrilaterals to solve for y (if the question supplies that the quadrilateral's points are all on the circle)
Okay I’ll try it thank you
I’m sorry I’m not getting it 🙁
If AD is a staright line, then CBD is 40 degrees
try to find other angles and then use the fact that opposite angles in cyclic quadrilaterals are supplementary to find y
Then y is 35 degrees.
yup
from my notebook
How? i didn't understand
idk i just scanned the pages out of my notebook with my phone lol
the last page got a lil tilted
I did reading wrong, my bad, i understand now hehe, very good job btw
Stills fine
fill in what you know whenever you get an angle inside one of the isosceles triangles, then use circle properties to set up an equation
after getting the angles that the arrows are coming from in this, you have enough info to solve
Thank you everyone:)
What's the easiest way to construct the Anti-Steiner point?
use the fact that the point at infinity perpendicular to the steiner line is the isogonal conjugate of the antisteiner point
which is easy to prove with angle chasing
basically this means you can draw the line perp to steiner through A, reflect it over the bisector of <A, and intersect the new line with (ABC) to find the antisteiner
Thank you
waiting for the person who actually studied Oly geo instead of half-assing their way through be like....
?
it's a compliment, take it
hi
Hmmm only 140° is known
Oh wait line A is straight until D
Ooh nvm i get it
Acute-angled scalene triangle ABC. Incenter I, circumcenter O, orthocenter H, Euler point E, Spieker point S, Nagel point N. Prove OI//ES//HN
A line is drawn in a trapezoid with bases 4 and 8, that is parallel to the bases of the trapezoid and divides the trapezoid into two congruent areas. What is the length of this line?
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
I'm looking for a study partner for probabilities any one in interested
Please don't spam this.
ok sorry
No worries.
60?
Arc ABC is 60 degrees. But x is half of that. [https://www.mathwarehouse.com/geometry/circle/angle-tangent-and-chord.php]
File not found. [404]
yes, but x = 30
TThe thing with scaling is that the triangles which you're scaling will always be similar So if you wanna find the factor by which it was shrunken. Then just divide all the sides by each other such as blue AB / orange AB = k
from the graph
does anyone have any suggestions as to how I should memorize all of the area formulas? I learned them a couple years back but should know them now that I am learning Geometry. (2d things like trapezoids, triangles, etc..)
blue AB = -6 -(-1) -> -6 + 1
do more questions on them?
well yeah, but how many types of formulas are there for area of 2d figures
-> -5. And similarly orange AB = -6-(-4) which is -2. So the answer is -2/-5 which is 2/5? Is that correct, do double check because I, not confident myself.
I know like five formulas which are always on my fingertips (rectangle, circle, ||gm, rhombus ,triangle)
what is the rhombus and ||gm fomrulas?
||gm: area = base × perpendicular height. Perimeter = 2(l+b)
for rhombus
AArea = (1/2) × d1 × d2 where d1 and d2 are the lengths of the diagonals
perimeter = 4b
thank you! I'll learn those ASAP
np.
oh so you just did a calculation error. Nothing else
can someone help me on this i'm new to trig and all i really know is SOHCAHTOA
what can you not get?
a specific part or the entire incorrect proof?
Is it just me or this question is just not possible with the given context?
it is possible.
byt in the figure
they marked the wrong angles
it says angle ECD not angle ECB
also yeah this question is in my book. Just with different angles.
they didn't mark ECD and ECB is 31
No ECD is given 20 in question
read it
at the top
yes
ye it's possible.
The diagram makes it seem impossible but of you read the question then it's possible.
Look at angle C and theta carefully and find out what might be the relation between them and what Aubrey has wrote
I trusted both the diagram and the question and still think it's impossible
In the answersheet they assumed that angle CDE= angle BAC
We can easily get CDE
But not BAC unless that assumption is explicitly stated
This is where I'm standing at
alright so from here
do you know the theorem "angle in same segments" ?
Uhhh I don't remember the proper name but if you tell me what it does maybe I'll know it
By the name I think it's talking about segments of the same size which there are none here
you see how uh
BC is an arc?
it is not given the diameter.
there's no center given for the circle so we cannot determine if it's the diameter or not
Yeah but it is definitely not an arc
why not?
oh I know your thingy
you like
Alr I see where this is going
make a circle around this figure
Dude look at this
This is much neater
ye
so from here
do you see that B And C are point on the circumference?
Yes
so don't they enclose an arc?
If BC was an arc angles BCD and CBA wouldn't exist
ye so can you tell me which two angles share the same side?
God damn I'm so bad at expaexplaining
can you tell
which two angles
BCD and CBA
share the same segment (BC)
Share BC
As there "segment"
yep
Which is 51
no no
BCD+BCA=51
The figure isn't correct wait
also jesus I can't explain.
wait brb
I'll come back when you have a proper explanation or even an answer
Ima do other questions
this red part here stretching from B to C is called an arc. An arc is commonly denoted straight up by "arc BC". So by saying arc BC. We mean the part of the circle enclosed by those two points.
If we wanna say which angles have the common arc BC then we say that Angle BAC and angle BDC have same arc because they're both made by the same points (B and C) and two different points anywhere on the circumference of the circle.
What's the fastest way to show that the incenter of a triangle is the Nagel point of its medial triangle?
from this if you calculate angle BDC then you get angle BAC too. Do you know how to do that @vapid remnant ?
tell me if it's a bit unclear
I'll try to clear it ,ore
mire
MORE
in books it is denoted by a symbol which I can't type on a keyboard.
let me try to fund it.
find
The scaling factor?
The person states that “You’re on the right track…Keep in mind that if the image is larger than the pre-image, the scale factor must be greater than 1.”
What
It said that it was scaled up
So the okd triangle (supposedly the big one) is the smaller one
I’ll give you the formula
The thin still applies
Ye there
The old image was the smaller one
I thought it was the bigger one
Then “Not quite…Remember that triangle ABC is the pre-image 😊”
I did is I counted 3 grids from the ABC to the larger triangle
Sonething cinfusing is that both of them are called ABC
Can you atleast say orange or green
😭
To separate it they made the green one A’ B’ C’
Ye its from -6 - (-4) [side AB if i remember the figure correctky]
Hm
Ok so the image was made bigger?
Then when I searched these up it’s 2.5 as a scale factor
Or 5/2
Tbh the question didnt specify which one was the after image. Or im just dumb as sho
Oh my god
Idk
Yes
That doesnt matter
You just need to find the scale
Ok wait
I assume it’s the distance from that point to A (Orange) and from (-6.2) to A’(green)
It looks like this right now
Because the blue image is the after image. One way i could think of putting it like is this.
If we do it normally and find the ratio if one side between the similar trianggles with it being AB/ A'B'. Which is equal is equal to 2/5. But since 2/5 is smaller than 1. If we apply it to the orange one. It would become smaller instead of bigger. But if we apply it to the bigger triangle then it becomes the smaller triangle. So to make the smaller triangle the bigger one. You have to reciprocal the scaling factor. And hence. You get 5/2
Center of dialation diesnt matter tbh
Read this and uh tell me if theres something you canr understand
Ill try my best
Thanks
Its just a problem on similar triangles but because its being dialated instead of shrunken diwn. The scaling factor would be the reciprocal of the normal factor you would get
Oh
Oh and no offense but you shoukd try and practice on the better counting of unit boxes in a graph because you counted -6 to -4 as -3
That big paragraph i wrote should give a good reasoning in why thats the case
Anyways
Ima go to algebra little bit cuz im interested and mainly in Algebra
Fire
I found a place where they used the arc symbol. Yoy mightve seen it in NCERT too
I also have the NCERT but i feel too lazy to open it rn 👍
Can someone help me with this? I'm kinda not sure what to do here, honestly.
I mean, a bot told me something, but it doesn't give much help
You should make a diagram that would attract more helper
I ain't reading allat
ixl thinks their funny
we'll see who's laughing after well...
after wha
also vro this is just adding 😭
to get all three sides of the big triangles equal
you add the smaller equal sides
yea but who feels like reading all of that
its confusing enough when they don't let me work out the proof myself and its more confusing when they give me some confusing model too
I got it correct anyway its just so tedious it makes me wanna rip all of my blood vessels outta my body
or split an atom on my head so it goes kaboom
its lowkey not tedious
what type of music
im listening to hamilton and I break into dance every time I hear something favorable
its ok you'll have your chance one day
ehh something like
idk
field of memories?
k
theres a song called grieving and it might be the best thing ive heard in a while 😭 🙏
i like music thats very loud
like not loud because you can adjust the volume by loud I mean lots of energy
flamewall might be the best type of that music genere ive heard then
do
btw mods if you're reading this, this is totally related to geometry
uhm
$sqrt(67+67)$
we can dash too :)
varq
😭
thats not sqrt
wym by dash?
ohhh
so im just gonna upload a proof im doing to keep the channel on topic
how’s my work look
oh my god i got so confused because usually our book doesnt give soem angles equal by just drawing them onto the figure 😭
i just use my book tbh. It already has a gazillion questions
if you need to remember you can do SOH CAH TOA in the first quadrant
$2root(43-23)$
emiya
emiya
can someone help with this problem?
Similarity of triangles, let's say ADE and ABK
I have this but how do I get DE?
EF is given and AK is median so DE...
wait the median carries through all the triangles?? 😭
Yes
assuming DF GJ and BC are parrallel. Then try to use similarity of triangles between AD and AB for triangle ADF and ABC
I have an algebra quiz about trig tomorrow. And it's asking for me to find the trigonometric ratio. What is a trigonometric ratio????
Trigonometric ratios are the relationships established in the trigonometric functions
so in this case you've got tan A
remember tan(x) = opposite/adjacent
SOH CAH TOA
okay so you're on right-angled trig, and you have these new functions sin, cos, tan
you want to know how sin, cos, tan are even defined
you literally take the right two sides in the given right-angled triangle, and divide them for the ratio
so for example, if you wanted to know sin A
SOH CAH TOA
sin = opp/hyp
the side opposite to angle A is a
the side which is the hypotenuse (longest side) is c
so sin A = a/c
HOw can I easily find the opposite and adjacent in a triangle? I'm so confused with that
can you see that side a is opposite to angle A?
Yes
similarly, the hypotenuse is always opposite the right angle
Ohhhhh
Tangent is opp/adjacent right? So a is opposite and b is adjacent? Is tan A a/b?
and then there's only 3 sides in a triangle
the hypotenuse is c
the opposite side to angle A is a
the adjacent side to angle A is ....
yep!
I just need to remember this image then I'll think I'll be fine
Tysm for the help
Ok! I'll make sure to keep that in mind
hi
I suck at algebra
But somehow so far I’m understanding trig
🙏🏼
I hope I don’t encounter a lot of algebra topics that I don’t remember during trig
I still am trying to study algebra a
are you comfortable with expanding brackets (the distributive law) and solving equations in general?
you don't need to know much of the algebra 2 stuff to be understanding trig
I think so
Like 5 ( 3+2) =25? Is that what u mean by expanding the brackets
Good I took algebra 2 freshman year and even then I was a horrible student
I wish I would’ve never skipped a year in math but oh well
yes, so you should absolutely be able to expand polynomial brackets
like (x^2 - 2x + 4)(2x - 3)
it's the same principle as 5 * (3 + 2) = 5 * 3 + 5 * 2, just with more steps and the variable x
I’d probably get this wrong
the thing about maths is that it's like a brick wall
topics build on each other so you can't have shaky foundations to progress further
I need something to measure my progress so illl try to use khan academy
since there’s like a mastery check and stuff
yes
I also have this great self-help resource
I wanna take ap calc next year
bc I need to take calc in college and don’t want to
So I need to practice
then work hard so that you're at the right level for calc AB
yeah I wanna take ab but everybody’s telling me to take bc but I only need ab credit
calc AB is around half precalculus so you'll be fine
don't listen to those people
Dc pre calc was frying me
there's humility in knowing your own level and knowing what's realistic for you
yeah
I also don’t want to work harder for no reason
I understand I’d learn but I don’t want to be frustrated to take math
I’m currently taking dual credit pre calculus
And I feel I’m doing way better now that I have a teacher
With trigonometry
ah okay
I just think it's important not to rush through all this new material, cause maths isn't a race
Yeah I don’t really have time to rush anyways so that’s fine for me
I just wanna pass trig
And be ready for ap calc ab and ap stats by August 2026
I’m taking 5 college courses so I don’t usually have spare time
wait you're already taking 5 college courses?
yeah
So when I graduate. High school I will have an associate degree
But I know I won’t use all the courses for my major but it’s wtv
why not drop a few courses at college then?
I can’t but I mean it’s fine
College is just stressful
you can't?
No other way around it
I made it easier for me this semester tho by ensuring I have instructors
no, there's academic advisors you can speak to and counsellors
At my High School
I'm just curious why you're taking a heavy workload despite the mental and physical costs
why do you want to graduate college sooner?
so I can get a job
I don't think that's necessarily an advantage
😭
you can still work when you're at high school
I also see it’s a good opportunity so I took advantage
It’s money saved
$6000
you scared of relying on your parents financially or something?
and at least 1 year saved from getting my bachelors degree
oh yeah most definitely
I have a job but it doesn’t pay much, so they would help me alot probably unless I get a scholarship
and I’m not rich so id qualify for full rides
not full rides free tuition
okay let me try and unpack all of that info
what sort of career are you trying to get into after uni?
accounting
I used to want to be a teacher but this year showed me to not choose that path
nice, well I don't know much about accounting though
I don’t know much either, I really just know that it’s a good degree and that they work with the expenditures a business makes
I'm not sure what the college requirements to graduate with an accounting degree are
And it’s able to have multiple career choices
most likely you'd just want to aim for AP calc BC credit and that's it for maths
A college im considering needs me to take CALC 1
Not calculus 2
So I can take ap calculus ab
cause a lot of STEM degrees don't exactly lead to a specific job either
I hope it’s much easier
if you take chem for example, you could find a connection somewhere and end up being a lab technician yes
equally likely however is that you'll end up in a job which doesn't use any of your chem knowledge
Yeah
Technically they need me to take business calculus
but yeah no matter what they tell you, you're better off having a college degree than going without
But I’d rather just try to satisfy the credit during my senior year since this year I will finish a lot of my credit
Yeah I really just want to get a degree cuz I feel like education is a privilege
even if I don’t get a job from a college degree I won’t be homeless or anything
from that perspective it'd be great if you could take AP calc this year, but it's no biggie if you end up taking it freshman year college either
I don’t wanna take it in college tho
exactly it insulates you from the worst shocks of the economy
professors are much more stricter then a high school teacher
of course to be 100% insulated you'll need to have been born in a rich family or something
$$ -4a^2k^2 - 8a^4 = k^4 - 2ahk^2 $$
fysch
do you mind if we continue our discussion here haha
I know this isn't the right place
is that so from your experience?
well, maybe not much more but
In my case
I mean, they certainly aren't going to be holding your hand, but from my experience if you just show up to office hours with some questions prepared, they're happy to help
high school side of my school can just turn in work whenever they feel like it
and it seems like they get babysat
oh okay so from that angle
As opposed to college
yeah absolutely it's sad to see HS turning into that
yeah I noticed this with my cc class, he had horrible RMP reviews but I think it was just student error
yeah it can be just salty students who haven't gotten out of that HS mindset
Yeah I didn’t even really know how different college was from hs
it’s like a light switch
And nobody really told me about it
mhm
Still scared for university 😭
yall know the cmd to complete the square ?
I think you're pretty prepared if you're already aiming for an associate's degree already
the other 2 years of uni aren't necessarily different
just major coursework I believe for me
just a bit more in depth into the degree content you're studying
yeah and maybe a bit more coursework
especially like a final year project or something
no I didn't, I'm not American
So you didn’t take ap calc ab either??
I did take calc BC though
yeah I mean people cover similar stuff around the world
oh that's good
And he teaches ap pre calculus and ap calc ab and calc bc
He said he wants me to take his class
I think it's good if you can take it in a high school environment
but it’s up to me which class he wanted me to start with ap pre calculus during my 2nd semester of junior year so right now but it would’ve been too much on my plate
yeah you're doing trig this semester so yeah
Yeah I really wanna take advantage of my college credit I can earn so hopefully I can not spend too much time at my college
He also said ap pre calculus is doing trig this part of the year so I’m not too worried about that for calculus ab
I think that's understandable, and yeah doing community college first then transferring in is a sound strategy
Yeah and it also helps my class rank
I’m 23 out of 1098 students in my grade level
oh your school still does class ranks in your entire grade
Since I think ap and college classes are weighed the same
No just my grade
that's a bit quaint, but I get the idea
I made an error
oh right okay
I feel though AP doesn't give many subjects justice
you're just trying to speedrun and cram the content
yeah I’ve taken two ap classes and only liked one
Because of the teacher
I don’t really like the structure and the way it works
conversely with college you're actually learning in that sort of more independent environment
and how u can pass the class with a 97 or something and not get college credit
many students don't either
and it’s still in the high school format, and at times it’s even more difficult then dual enrollment which does give college credit
that's insane that AP is harder than the actual dual enrollment course
I think this is just some courses
Like I think Ap calculus ab and Bc are easier then their college counterparts
but apush and ap physics would probably be more difficult then their college counterpart
Can anyone tell me if I'm right
sin A = a/c
cos A = b/c
tan A = a/b
good 
Yayyy thank youy

So is the cosecant c/a, the secant c/b and the cotangent b/a?
yep!
there you go, that's all 6 trig ratios
That means my notes are right? Yay
oh, a is opposite to angle A
opposite and adjacent only make sense relative to a specific angle
so sin A = ...
cos A = ....
and so on
Oh ok
But how about finding the sec, csc and cot in a graphing calculator?
oh there are buttons for those
if you don't see any buttons, remember the reciprocal rule
so csc(20) = 1/sin(20)
sec(50) = 1/cos(50)
they're hidden under some menu though, so not buttons exactly
sin, cos, tan are the buttons
Let me try finding
How do I change the graphic calculator from radian to degree?
Oh wait I did it I just pressed enter
is this correct for the quadrantal angle?
Quadrant I = 0-90 degree angles
Quadrant II = 91-180 degree angles
Quadrant III = 181- 270 degree angles
Quadrant IV = 271-360 degree angles
yes
lower bounds are not correct
90.001 lies in 2nd quadrant
What’s a?
The information given is insufficient
I thought we can make a slope intercept form
I can assume that it’s around 1 or 2
It doesn't even solve by the distance formula
are the squares equal to one unit
slope of the line is one than
Yes
Just need the y intercept
$3-a/3-0$
varq
varq
$/frac{3-a}{3-0}$
varq
The b on “y=mx+b” as to be negative
$3 - \frac{a}{3} = 0$
Altanis
So close 🥀 🥀
no
ok thats some new info that we didn't have access to
Yep
What’s that stated
?
That said “Unit five square slant …”
not sure what you're asking atm
Something
That’s what the chalk board said
Rest of them I don’t understand
I only read “unit five square slant ? the area of the square to half”
the image has 5 unit squares
the slanted line splits those into two parts
the unshaded part and the shaded yellow part
these areas are equal
do you see how
I thought of making it like a puzzle moving pieces around
gl diagram no to scale
ahh moment
anyways let's not assume shaded portions are x% shaded
right and base?
We don’t know cuz
you can write in terms of a
It’s (a) units
m.. no
2.5 u
2 and an half
a
uh red is 3
Oh so it’s 3-a*
yes
Distribute 3 to 3-a to get 9-3a/2
yes
It’s 7-3a/2
5/2
5/2=7-3a/2
I got a=2/3
anyone have tips to remember trig exact values
look up trig exact values hand
I am trying to find the volume enclosed by a moving boundary with velocity 'v', anyone can help me find some resources
Provide some more information lol
If you have to remember a lot you could watch
https://youtube.com/shorts/77vlRweCtGE?si=_D2LRnfZFwOIwmVt
after understanding how the six trig ratios worked together through triangle congruence, I was able to prove so many formulas in just a few minutes
In this video, we show a single diagram consisting of various triangles that connects the six primary trig functions (sine, cosine, tangent, secant, cosecant, and cotangent) to lengths of line segments created from the unit circle (circle of radius 1). We also briefly discuss the fact that the "co" on three of the functions refer to the "comple...
Ok.
Given a time-dependent region Omega(t) whose boundary moves with velocity v, how can the enclosed volume be computed, or how can its rate of change be expressed in terms of v?
I came across this equation. Does this work?
Shouldn't the integral be replaced with a surface integral
Try posting this in the calculus section not here
Okay
<@&268886789983436800>
Can someone please send me the inversion sol of IMO2011 P6?
why do you want to invert on that problem
there are a few inversion sols on aops but i dont think it makes the problem any easier than just doing the normal sol, which i think is also more instructive since a lot of problems of that kind are solved with that trick.
this one looks decent
Thank you
I saw the complex sols quite a few times but when looking at at some sol pages, it mentions there being an inversion sol but i couldn't find it
So curiosity got me
oh ok
I have this so far:
EF is A-antiparallel wrt ∆ABC (E ∈ AC, F ∈ AB) so the symmedian of ∆AEF is the median of ∆ABC. Similarly, it follows that AX, BY, CZ are concurrent at centroid G of ∆ABC
I need AG ⊥ YZ but I don't know how
angles give you ||Y, D, foot of C onto AM (lets call it U) are collinear|| and same on the other side (lets call the other point V).
now if you add ||CU int BG = I and BV int CG = J|| notice that ||CI//BJ perp AG||
try to prove YZ is also parallel to those 2 with proj
By "same on the other side" you mean Z,V,D?
aka ||try to show (GY,IB) = (GZ,CJ)||
yes
i hope i didnt mess up the letters cause i drew a lot of diagrams with other triangles as reference and i didnt name a single point lmao
What was your intuition on this problem btw? Why did you think about those intersections?
My first thoughts on this were antiparallels through X,Y,Z or the Lemoine L of ∆ABC and its pedal triangle
But those didn't get me very far
first i tried to see what was the best way to define Y and Z, and what seemed good enough to me was defining Y as ||the point on BG such that <YDB = <GAC||
this makes you try to use the equal angles to find a cyclic quad, which you do by introducing the point U
then i took DUV as reference triangle and tried defining the whole problem in terms of that because it looked a bit simpler, idk if this actually helps, you dont really need it
Oh this is because ∆ABC ∪ G ~ ∆ DBF ∪ {G_DBF}
Didn't pop out to me
Yeah but I really enjoy seeing different people's approaches, it's fascinating to see how you do it
I don't think I know how, do you proj through D and then V?
Wait Idk what i'm talking about 
look at each one individually, for example if you look at (GY, IB) then what are the best points to project this from
like, ideally you'd want a point K such that most of KG, KY, KI, KB are already in your diagram
if not all
here ||you have a point for which all those lines are already there for you|| and that point is ||suspence....||||U||
||if you keep in mind you want to project this one from U and similarly the other one from V, its not hard to see where you want to project them exactly||
There isn't UB in the diagram though, right?
Wait did i follow your points correctly
ok mb then just stick to the "almost all of them"
No worries
I'll put this here to make it easier
Do you keep B as it is and denote M as the midpoint of BC
U(GYIB)= U(MDBC)
And Maclaurin?
I just got enlightened
anyway since you technically also had other good enough points to project through, ill tell you why i think U is the better one: if youre trying to solve this and you got to this point, you realise that points Y and Z kinda suck because Y = BG int DU is not so easy to control, so what you want to do with proj is projecting through points that allow you to undo the constructions: projecting from D or U would allow you to delete Y and line UD, so that you delete the bad points. So U and D should be your first tries, and here U seems a lot better
usually this is a very useful idea in proj, you're always trying to undo the constructions and deleting the bad points
and proj is one of the best tools to do this
Thanks again, you've helped me a lot, both with the ideas and even more so with the explanations 
WoW there are Olympians here 🥹
Olympians are so oppressed lmao
Whenever I mention math olympiads some dude says « Olympiad math is not real math, it’s memorisation »
It's both memorization and solving skill
It has a lot of memorization
you never actively try to memorize stuff
you actually dont even need to know that much stuff
Eh but we do that by solving problems, it's a fun way tho
compared to uni math etc
Hmmm true
Tho if you memorize a whole bunch of small and unique problems that would be an advantage
Well not if the problem is entirely new
Is it ok to assume lengths like the green color even when it's not given? And if so, then can you assume that for more lengths like in the blue or do you have to prove that? Maybe you can only assume for one segment's length and make it something neat like 1 for example and work around that?
shouldnt AE = AD mean that angle AED = angle ADE
I suppose, but that's not my question, I'm just giving an example of a random triangle, I don't mean this triangle but just any shape in geometry or math at all.
I hope that clarifies my question
hm
the thing with assuming one thing is that if youre going to use it then your entire thing would be based on it
I'm just assuming lengths, not proving anything, so AE being 3 is no problem here. Except for the fact that it might not match reality, so I'm wondering what are the limits on saying what has what quantity?
True, however can you also like scale things by a k factor to match the original maybe?
And so whatever shape you are trying to interpret is similar to the real one if that makes sense?
ye then it would be the same as the original. We are basically asumming that a length x = 2k and not just 2
Can I say this is 10 and this is 3 without being given that? I know it's a really dumb question, but I'm not sure.
no but you could say that they are 10k where k is any variable
10k is a variable Whereas 10 is a constant
I think the reason I can't do that is because it's not necessarily similar, because if we only choose one side then we can calculate the other sides and stuff with proportions to the real triangle.
one reason is that you are fixing the value of a variable where it isnt even given
Can you say this?
i think so
Tysm for the help!
np
yep heres an example.
no wait
shi lemme make the figure first
fuck
i wanna sleep
night
Sorry I didn't catch your messages, goodnight!!! ❤️ and thanks again!!
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
alright my brain is working somewhat now so here's one question I could think of wich uses this idea. "Prove that the ratio of the perimeter of similar triangles is the same as the ratio of their sides" Hint: ||take p/q = some factor k. Where p and q are sides of the similar triangles||
if you want me to then I can also provide the solution
What program is this
What program is this
Anyways
I have a argument with someone that we don't need to add 90 to the angle arccos(7/9). First Image part d is the question, height is 7. The second image is what he made and the third image is for the purple angle arccos(7/9)
How is it 7/9
7 = adjacent
9 = hypotenuse
properties of isocelese triangle!
Sure! This is interesting
Khan Academy
Solution?
Yea
Wait
Thankd
Ofc
Np
I think ive also eaten a part of one page 😭🙏
Like its just missing
Really small part but yes
XD
Where did you prove what was asked ?
I guess the proof is not complete if i am correct
Gdo damnit i forgot to write what was to be proved
xd
😭
Np
Tis
No wait i did write it
Cool proof, tysm!
Np
@shut thorn i guess you should show k equal to p/q in the end
Cause that expression is the ratio of perimeters
Its from similarity of triangles
Idk why i wrote AB/PQ as p/q in the first lune
Then just refused to use it
And we should explicitly state the equality we were asked
Yeah, there was even no need for the variable k
You couldve used p/q in place of that every time
The k was somewhat needed to show that AB is just PQ but scaled down by a factor of k
The question was ti show that the perimeter is in the same ratio as the sides of two similar triangles
And you can only do that if you show that the sudes of the similar triangles are equal IF muktipkied by some factor k
Multipkied
MULTIPLIED
No we could have also wrote that the AB is the scaled vsrsion of PQ where the scaling factor is p/q
Took it as k for simplicity
Ye that works too
P/q
Being the scaling factor
Ye thats fine
Yeah if the side(s) are equal, the triangles are congruent
if the sides are equal then the k factor making the sides of the similar triangles is equal to 1
Can anyone check my attempt on this question ?
looks good
Ok thanks
@sly urchin why did you delete it :(
Oh i didn't think there was anyone interested
And thought to open a help channel
Sorry
I'll resend it then
∆ABC, incircle (I), orthocenter H. Tangent of (I) parallel to AB cuts BC, CA at L, K. Tangent of (I) parallel to AC cuts BC, AB at G, J. KJ cuts HB, HC at M, N. (I) is tangent to BC at D.
Prove that HD, LM, GN are concurrent
i solved it
its actually really easy to get rid of H, M, N with proj
So you try to prove the cross ratio is the same when projected through T?
I need to get better at proj, it's my weakest part of geo
my idea was to show that GN int HD is the same point as LM int HD, so you can try to show (H, JK int HD; NG int HD, D) = (H, JK int HD; ML int HD, D)
Yeah, seems fine to me
projecting the first one from N and the second one from M, you get rid of H, M, N and you're left with normal incenter config points
you still need a bit of work but you took away the annoying points so now its doable
I'm guessing you're projecting the points onto BC, thus i should name JK ∩ BC?
yes
It can be proven using Desargues' Theorem
I try to prove M(HSTD)=N(HST'D) or equivalently M(BRLD)=N(CRGD)
Please elaborate
We can consider the triangle HMN and GDL (although GDL is a degenerate triangle) but the theorem still works. So if we let the correspondence of vertices like this:
H-D , N-G, M-L
Then we want to prove that the corresponding vertices of the two triangles of interest are concurrent
Acc to Desargues' Theorem, if their the intersection points of the corresponding sides of those two triangles are collinear, it just be true that the lines mentioned are concurrent
Oh I didn't know Desargues applied to lines (degenerate triangles)
Can you fact check that?
desargues doesnt work with degenerate triangles
Sure ?
yes
If it worked like that, i could prove every 2 triangles are similar lol
yeah
So back to this
I tried simply using the definition of cross ratios
And the fact that DB/DC=AB/AC
i thought i knew the question too well
anyways im gone
because this will go out of the topic
this is not true
Oh shoot
it would be if D was AI int BC
AD is not the bisector
yeah
My bad
Oh yes sorry, double checked it. Big palmface
So what I need is (BRLD)=(CRGD)
I notice that these 2 have 2 points in common
So my thought is just to apply the definition
Oh wait
Menelaus?
Wait no
Those points are collinear
What am I talking about lol
This is equivalent to BL/BD . CD/CG . RG/RL = 1
Or I guess a better way to write it would be LB/LR . DC/DB . GR/GC = 1
@upper karma am i on the correct track?
Or should I have continued projecting
you can reduce the calculations a little bit if you project once more, but you can also continue on that path
Hm... "calculations"
lol i mean its still just ratios
not heavy calculations
btw idk if you noticed already but you know <GIC and <BIL
No I didn't notice that, in fact i'm trying to prove it
IG and IL don't seem very nice
theyre actually not bad at all once you notice it
Wait is I the midpoint of JK?
yes
I sense a mixtilinear incircle lurking around
There might be more right angles at play than i thought
I "see" that BIL=CIG=90° but haven't proven it
This should be obvious though
I need ∠GIL=90° - ∠A/2
GDI and GIC are similar...
I can't believe i still can't prove GIC=90°
<@&268886789983436800>
Funny that they post that the same second I show up 
Oh yeah
That's exactly what this is
oh btw i found a way to do another projection that makes this a lot faster, if you want it its ||project from I to (BIC)||
Uhmm... Project which cross ratio?
i mean the ones at the start
those
Also why (BIC)? The only nice property about that circle which I know is OB=OI=OC (O being the center of (BIC))
IR is a tangent of (O) but what to do with the points G,D,L?
They don't seem to project nicely onto (O)
There might be properties of cross ratios that I am unaware of
so like ||G will go to a point G' such that G'B perp BC||
nah i mean you have <GIC = 90
Yes
then you can just do the same thing you were doing before
like, use the definition of cross ratio
you know that the same definition with the ratios of segments also works on circles
and everythings so much better from here
as youll see
I don't get this part
Do you project through ∞_AH
G'C is the diameter of (O)
So G'BC=90°
Okay i see it
And i guess i call ID ∩ (O) = D'
I'll show you my idea after this I guess
I(BRLD)=I(BRL'D')
I(CRGD)=I(CRG'D')
Doesn't seem very nice
Sorry carbonara, I just don't understand
Btw in while trying, I noticed a few things
The A-mixtilinear incircle wrt ∆ABC is tangent to AB, AC at J,K
Similarly to the B and C -Mixtilinear incircle and BC
Damn noticed ur good in geo
This observation makes R a point with many propterties
Try AGO 3rd edition P6 
Hell nah i'm not
I'm sucking at this
P3
Nuh uh, i'm struggling with this easy problem even after many many hints
So we try to prove (BLRD)=(CGRD) instead to make use of R and D more
Which is equiv to:
RB/RL : DB/DL = RC/RG : DC/DG
<=> RB/RC . RD/RL = DB/BL . DG/DC
If I let XI ∩ BC = P then (BCRP)=-1
Or RB/RC=PB/PC=XB/XC=JB/KC
I feel like a sol should "click" anytime soon
We need L'B/L'R : D'B/D'R = G'C/G'R : D'C/D'R
But L'B=G'C so we only need RG'/RL'=D'B/D'C
I need sleep, it's about 2AM here
Maybe i'll wake up with a simple sol
This Mixtilinear approach seems promising btw
why are you using R here
once you project (BRLD) through I onto (BIC), R goes to I so youre looking at (BIL'D')
i see why you were struggling lmao, idk if you got confused but the cross ratio is that one
with this fix you only need IG'/IL' = D'B/D'C and you should be able to see why this is true
anyway i'll also say how i would have proceeded from here since you should still be able to know how to continue even when your path is suboptimal (edit: it turns out its not that bad).
||using ratio lemma,
LB/LR = sinLIB/sinLIR * IB/IR = IB/IRsin(90+ICB) = IB/IRsinDIC
similarly GR/GC = IRsinDIB/IC||
so ||LB/LR * GR/GC = IBsinDIB / ICsinDIC = DB/DC||
which is not that bad.
Actually, if youre ok with seeing a bit of trig like that then heres how you can do it by just using the definition of cross ratio with sines:
||(BR,LD) = (sinBIL/sinLIR) / (sinDIB/sinRID) = (1/sinDIC) / (sinDIB/sinRID) = sinRID/(sinDIC*sinDIB)
this is symmetric so its equal to (CR,GD)||
(so ig sorry for making it seem harder than what it was)
tbh at first i didnt see this so maybe youll think this is even better than what i suggested, but hopefully youll agree projecting onto (BIC) also makes the final equality of ratio much easier to see, maybe if you want to avoid trig at all costs (although its not like i bashed with trig or anything, those sols are still elegant imo)
the way i initially did it was ||rotate (IB,IR;IL,ID) by 90 degrees to get (IL,IA;IB,I(inf_BC)) and project this onto BC so that if Z = AI int BC the cross ratio is equal to LB/BZ, so you want to prove LB/BZ = GC/CZ||. Then you can ||rewrite as LB/GC = BZ/CZ, but BL = BI^2/BD and CG = CI^2/CD, so you only need (BI/CI)^2 = BD/DC * BZ/CZ, but this is known to hold whenever ID and IZ are isogonal in <BIC, which they are so were done.||
What in the world is that
Uh oh, yeah I'll blame my lack of sleep 
Oh nice, last part is Steiner's theorem or sth right?
oh yes i didnt know the name but yes its that
I got a nice question - If a circle is inside or outside another circle, prove that the points on them with least distance between, and the centres of both circles lie on same line.(Easy but classic)
any type that is pre university