#geometry-and-trigonometry
1 messages · Page 30 of 1
so i just take arccos of that?
yes
Aman
wait i get the same thing though
wdym
oops sorry i didnt read the question
yeah 1-sqrt3/2 is correct
it was asking for all values of cosx 😭
wait how do i get a correct answer for cos(theta)
i got cos(x)=0
double angle formula for sin
2sinxcosx=tanx
and then i put tangent in terms of sine and cosine
so 2sinxcosx=2sinx/cosx
then multiplied by cosx to get 2sinxcos^2x=2sinx
can divide 2sinx on both sides
yes thats g
i got cos^2x=1
sqrt
so cosx=1
then took arccos
but 1 is wrong it says (its asking for values of cosx)
or its not the only value
cos(x) could be -1 as well right?
cool
ty
E must be the midpoint of the chord FH because EO is perpendicular to FH
I'm trying to help my niece with Geometry but I'm not sure what these questions are asking us to do? Can somebody help clarify?
im pretty sure for the first one it means reflect pentagon QRSTU over line B to form pentagon Q'R'S'T'U'
and for the second one its reflect ABCD over line K to form A'B'C'D
that's what i thought too but i'm not sure how to do that accurately without a coordinate system
what's the problem?
hey man, is this supposed to be $\cot(\theta+1)\cdot\csc(\theta-\frac{1}{2}=0$
or $(\cot(\theta)+1)\cdot(\csc(\theta)-\frac{1}{2})=0$
TheLord26
seems like it
i hate LaTeX
im going under the assumption that it is the second one
$\cot(\theta+1)\cdot\csc(\theta-\frac{1}{2}=0$
TheLord26
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
WHY DOESNT THIS WORK
$\cot(\theta+1)\cdot\csc(\theta-\frac{1}{2})=0$
🐱!Yajat! 【Catfan1398】🐱
what are you trying to do
help this dude with a math problem, and then getting severly side tracked with LaTeX and then forgetting to help the dude. dammit
Okay, so I'm assuming that the question is asking for (cot(theta)+1)(csc(theta)-1/2)=0
i feel that this is the question
we cant't do anything about until the one who asked it comes online
immajust do both
what do you mean?
the csc of any real angle can't be less than 1 so we can just neglect it
So to start, what you want to do is see that either $(\cot(\theta+1))$ or $(\csc(\theta)-\frac{1}{2})$ must equal 0. From there, you can test to see whether $\cot(\theta)=1$ and $\csc(\theta)=\frac{1}{2}$ turn out to be.If you start with $\csc(\theta)=\frac{1}{2}$ you will find that it has no solutions $\in{\rm I!R}$.
TheLord26
i could see the LaTeX gods typing in the chat, oh god
This makes logical sense, if you see how $\csc$ is defined, that being $\csc(\theta)=\frac{1}{\sin(\theta)}$, and as there is no way $\frac{1}{n}$ can ever equal 0, it must mean that $\csc(\theta)$ can never equal $0$.
TheLord26
So, you should test $\cot(\theta)=-1$, using some simple algrebra, you can rearrange to make the equation $\arctan(-1)=\theta$, and if you know your exact value triangles, or you use a calculator, you will find $\theta=\frac{3\pi}{4}$.
TheLord26
You can double check the answer by plugging theta into the original equation if you want. But if that was the incorrect equation to being with, and you needed to the other equation, (cot(theta+1))*(csc(theta-1/2))=0, well, dam ig?. @autumn gorge
Thankyou guys @smoky jetty @heady scaffold @nocturne remnant
does that mean the intersection of any chord perpendicular to a radius is always the midpoint the chord?
Yes , a perpendicular through centre to chord bisect the chord hence the intersection point is the midpoint.
If you meant the radius is perpendicular to the chord (as i couldn't understand the sentence in the message) , it is not
Yes and can you not ping reply me for everything
ahh mb
i see, but if it were the radius that's perpendicular to the chord, would it also bisect it?
rusty on quadratics stuff, but I got 0 = (x+16)(x-4), how do u get the desired value of x for it?
Radius goes through the chord so if radius is perpendicular to chord it also bisect the chord.
alrighty, thanks for the clarification!
X has to be 4 as it can't be -16 so .
so u just make the -4 positive?
Um its not negetive 4,
in the RHS?
Yes the expression contain -4 but for equation to become zero x has to be either -16 or 4. Since x can't be -16 so it has to be 4
but for equation to become zero x has to be either -16 or 4. Since x can't be -16 so it has to be 4
sorry but I didnt quite get that. Could u elaborate it further?
Could you once revise the ' zero product rule ' from the book.
On the rhs there are two expressions. One of them has to be zero so their product will become zero.
So if x is 4 there is only possible situation for the Rhs to become zero.
oh i see now
def didnt learn that in alg before, lol
So I looked up the rule u said. And wrote my understanding upon it
since the chord lengtb camnot be negative, we choose 4 right
so essentailly in the LHS, we must make either factors =0, and since the factors are in the form of (x+a), we get the inverse/negative of a to cancel it out and thus becomes (0) as a factor
then that inverse of a, will be a value of x, then same concept applies to the other factor, giving us the 2nd value of x
so yeah, thx for the help!
idk what i did but yw
oh ya this is that problem
welp I did a simple proof to see it better, and found out that if the radius is perpendicular to chord and we make two triangles out of the chord segments and the radii, then the two triangles are coungrent by SSA (for right triangle)
thats what I have trouble with
maybe send a photo of your diagram if possible?
it says that it's side AB that is bisected perpendicularly
yeah
ok
did u get the answer? just curious
Hoping this is correct (dont click if u havent solved it yet) ||By connecting A and D, we can infer that AD=BD (SAS congruence), making triangle ABD an isosceles. Hence, the Perimeter of triangle ADC = AC+CD+AD or AC+CD+BD = x. Now, since AD=BD, and BD is part of triangle ABC's perimeter, we can say that the Perimeter of ADC + AB = P_ABC = x + 12. Therefore, AB= 12.||
yea I was thinkin the same thing
i wanted to clairify
sure
lemme get this straight: when the pronumeral is the denominator, you just rearrange the equation to divide the numerator by the trig function, but when the pronumeral is the numerator you multiply it by the trig function?
What is a "pronumeral"??
an unknown such as a letter
you rearrange to make A the subject by multiplying or dividing
so i am correct right
If you are asking question c and want to know the length of A, then it is correct.
Me talking abt this
Everything else is correct except idk there is an ssa congruency
Didn’t you use SAS?
right ok
thx
why is this possible to do and why do you do this?
oh right, yeah it's SAS btw
afaik SSA isnt a congruency criterion for triangles except for right triangles
seems right. Just remind yourself that you'd have to transform that equation into smth that would isolate that unknown value either in RHS or LHS
ye ok
Lol
in the trapezoid ABCD, with the bases AB > CD, we note M,N the means of AD, respectively BC. The bisectors of angles A and B intersect MN in E and F, respectively. Prove that EF= AB+CD/2 - AD+BC/2
AB+CD/2 is equal to MN
and AD+BC/2 is equal to AM+BN
So we basically have to prove that AM = MF
and that BN=NE
what is a polynomial
an equation with multiple terms
wow
what?
That is a very bad answer if I’ve ever seen one
😭 im sorry
An equation in the form ax^n + bx^(n-1) + ... + k
Like for example quadratics like x^2 + 2x + 1 are polynomials but so are cubics (like x^3 + 6x^2+x-4) and you can really have any power of x in there
ya
and n is called the degree of the polynomial
ax + b is also a polynomial and so is just a constant "a" but I'm not sure if that's relevant to your specific needs or not
no 1+cos(x) can not be equal to cos(x/2)😭
EXACTLY, I have been solving an exercise in physics and when I looks at the solution if I find it...
@thick fable Look at that:
Yep.
what concept is this i dont get it, also what is $\vec{V}_{\theta}$?
🐱!Yajat! 【Catfan1398】🐱
isnt angluar velocity $\omega$
🐱!Yajat! 【Catfan1398】🐱
and also how can the time derivative of the velocity vector be equal to the velocity vector
its just too confusing
he made a writing mistake then fam.
it should be acceleration tangential
$\ aren't Vc and omega difference?$ Because: $ Vc = frac{ds}/{dt}$ while $omega = frac{dteta}/{dt}$ ?
yea they are different
$\ aren't Vc and \omega different?$ Because: $ Vc = frac{ds}/{dt}$ while $\omega = frac{dteta}/{dt}$ ?
one is angular velocity and another is linear velocity
Анатолив.
Oh my lord.
also what is $\vec{e}_{\rho}$ doing there in the equation and wtf is even this
🐱!Yajat! 【Catfan1398】🐱
$\vec{e}{\rho} $ = $\vec{u}{\rho}$ it is just a notation.
Анатолив.
yeah because u studied english math and I studied french.
Same but different notaions.
it is just like i and j in carteesian coordinates.
ngl you are giving me heart attack, I feel like all my notes are wrong...
like is $\vec{a}_{\t}$ = R . TETA ?
Анатолив.
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
like is $\vec{a}_{t}$ = R \cdot \theta$ ?
🐱!Yajat! 【Catfan1398】🐱
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
you mean this?
yes.
Help me out with proofs please I almost finished it im just stuck
🐱!Yajat! 【Catfan1398】🐱
its better if u just post 2 pics of it
helpppp
wait 15 min of my lecture is left
then if I'm not wrong, then $\vec{a}_{t}$ = R \cdot the derivative of \omega$ ?
Анатолив.
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
the derivative of omega.
🐱!Yajat! 【Catfan1398】🐱
as $\frac{d \omega}{dt}=\alpha$
what is the notation of the derivative of omega?
🐱!Yajat! 【Catfan1398】🐱
u mean formulaes?
y
oh
i dont know about that sorry
i means its simple, the derivations to these formulaes are hard but if u just want the formulaes u can just search them on google, ur sstudying undergraduate circular motion so i dont have much idea about what topics r in ur syllabus
I tried everything that makes sense
You can look at my steps
i really dont wanna look at all those im lazy what what u can do is, u can prove the triangles BAC and DCE congruent, with the help of RHS congruence rule, from that u can conclude that angle BCA and DCE are equal
from this can u tell me the relation between
angle BCF and DCF?
I appreciate your efforts, and I indeed already downloaded a pdf and I'm learning currentyl.
I don't know if this is the right place to ask this, but I don't know if {4, 4/2} is a regular polyhedron or not.
Like, it's face-, edge- and vertex-transitive, but according to wikipedia, the vertex figure also has to be a regular polygon (which it is not)
So it meets one definition, but not the (supposedly equvalent) other definition. So either it isn't f,e,v-transitive (and thus not a regular polygon), or the definitions aren't equivalent, and it is a regular polyhedra, but I cannot find it on any list.
@thick fable still have no clue
16?! Most of my proofs were only 2-6 long
Yes lol I managed to figure it out
Yo can someone help me figure out how too use the distance formula on this I forgot how too on this equation 😭
Would be appreciated
u would just plug the coords for the endpoints of each segment
for example for BD it would be sqrt((-5-(-2))^2 + (-2-1)^2)
lol no worries
i hate distance formula so much lol
so many bad geometry memories
Can anyone figure out (xiv)??
anyone know how to help me with this? im an advanced 7th grader doing year 8-9 work
i nearly cried doing this today
You can use the pythagoras theorem
The part of the straw inside the glass, the height of the cylinder and the base diameter of the cylinder form a right angled triangle
$c=\sqrt{a^{2}+b^{2}}\newline c=\sqrt{2.5^{2}+(4\cdot\sqrt{6})^{2}}\newline c\approx10.11\newline10.11+5=15.11$
TheLord26
okay do u know how do we prove any 2 triangles congruent
u mean like the SAS ASA AAS stuff?
yes
yea
what can u say about thier lenthgs then
yes
so you know that VZ is congruent to WY and UV to WX and UZ to YX
then can u prove this triangle congruent?
SSS
ooh
okay
tysm
can u help me w another problem?
i know ur supposed to solve the big trangles first
i think
oh wait
all the given stuff
one angle in common if u see carefully
and angle w is congruent to angle w because of reflexive
so how do i go from there?
well u see angle W is common in both the triangles
yes
then what the part troubling you
you have 2 information given in the question itself
hmm
well we have one angle of the triangles given already
and theres vertical angles
then what
oh
well you see youve given a side congruent
did that
sorry waht?
no and why would u need that
well u dont need that
u have to prove these 2 triangles equal
congruent*
ASA?
what do u think about it
oh wait
i thought we were trying to prove the 2 tiny triangles congruent
oops
nvm
tyy
yeah i read it wrong
what is part troubling you
help again pls-
doesnt matter now i figured it out
im doing a different one now
you are writing the angles wrong
,rccw
yes
okk tysm
wait i dont know what reflexive are but they common angles
my teacher said its just used to prove something is equal to itself
he didn't really explain much other then that
you need to write angle 1 congruent to angle 2 thru CPCT
then what is it cos i dont understand it
why are u doing that question then
dont you still have to prove that the small triangles are congruent? or no
if your school havent taught u yet
no
oh
omg r u doing proofs too
so how would i continue
i only proved the big ones
now u know what is meant by CPCT?
yes
yea that what is needed
then u can just use that to prove the angles equal
so i would just say theyre equal due to cpctc
ye
its an entrance ticket, meanign taht it gives u a preview of what ur gonna learn
Use Pythagorean thereom, and then add 5 to it to account for the additional length of the straw.
.
shouldnt this equal 81 degrees?
finding the sum of the interior angles?
nvm i did smth wrong
i did that
Not a triangle
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
nice pfp
okay so you need need to write all those steps u wrote after the step 1
they r of no use actually
well
u know what vertically opposite angles are?
no
something like this
not sure if that's visible
better one
can u do ur question now
ohh ok
yo that happens to be what im doing in geometry atm
im very bad at it though
i see a lot of ppl here facing problems in these provings, i means its so simple if you have the knowledge about the relations between the angles on a transversal
and the rules ofc
Can anyone help me with this(explain it like a baby please)
not the best place to ask such physics question but okay what have you tried so far
idk
i dont know how to solve it
also how do I apply for another channel like physics or engineering
I was thinking cos30-10 for the left one
you wont be able to solve this if u dont know about vector projections
so what do I do
hold on brb
you can check #old-network and find the physics server there
is there an engineering server
there are specified engineering servers
@solemn hollow what have u tried so far
i tried drawing a triangle and labeling the sides and the angle measure
ok do u know that the angle oppsite to the longest side is the largest?
yes, i know that
so you that angle ACB should be greater than greater than 70 degrees
so
it can just be a lil bit greater than 70 too
so for angles A only 40 degrees are left
less than 40 precisely
is it bc 70+70=140 and 180-140= 40?
yes
so the highest it can be is 40?
and that angle C can just be lil greater than 70 degrees too
less than 40 actually
A being 40 means
C and B ar both 70 degrees
wait i have a question.. how do i figure out the lowest it can be
oh that makes sense
so it has to be less than 40
yea
then what does it have to be greater than?
sorry i dont get what u r asking
like a range you know "< angle < " in that form it would be <A<40 but what would be on. the other side
well u know it can obviously cannot be 0
np!
well its the same concept
u know that Z has to be the smallest
that is less than 30 degrees
so u know that sum of the angle Z and Y is less than 60
so similarly u can say that
X can be greater than 120
oh damn-

my baddddd
change it to ronaldo🔫
noooooo
,tex .recip trig
Akira E-Girl
this is trig i managed to figure it out ! im first year in college
all good
anyone know how to do this?
Can someone tell me how parametric points on parabola come from?
like what's (at^2, 2at)
don’t ask to ask just ask
remember that the sum of all angles in a triagle equals 180
for this we construct a formula
solving for the first triangle as an example
$x=180+(8y-7)+(\frac{6y}{5})$
Mr. Macro
can someone explain to me both the geometric mean theorem for altitudes and the geometric mean theorem for legs?
didnt get it while i was in class and the theorem sheet confuses me
<@&268886789983436800> a question from the current AMC (which is happening until the end of today)
Wait, how do you know?
The testing portal has a very distinct format
And this question doesn’t show up on any of the practice tests on said portal
Btw they also posted this in a help channel
does that mean it was confirmed question?
Hello! So we had a test today, but i cant seem to move after it. So basically, there was a problem where you need to calculate the area of the triangle. V and B were unknown at the start of it. Then, i found out if you make it into 2 smaller triangles, you get the area of 84cm2. But if you calculate it as a whole triangle it is 85cm2. All my classmates are saying it's 84, who's in the right?
Apologizing for bad image
Since b is 10 and a is 17, so the area should be (10x17) : 2
Which is 85. But if you put it into two triangles
so it would be 8x15 : 2 + 6x8:2
Which would be 60 + 24
Which is 84cm2
how??
Yes
Then we calculate b and that is 8x8 + 6x6
Which is 36cm + 64
so 100
And then we calculate the area of the triangle
Which is ab : 2
So 10 x 17 : 2
which is 170 : 2
So 85cm
Right?
Is AB =21?
Yes
But if we take it as 2 triangles
which are
So 8 x 15 is 120 : 2 is 60 right?
- 48:2
which is 24
is 84cm2?
It does it was like that
it split the side to 6cm on the left
and 15cm on the right
How could it be wrong
its just calculating an area
My bad, I copied the values incorrectly
its nothingg
Everyone got 84cm2 but i was the only one to go calculate it without splitting it into 2 triangles
i have no idea what is happening
even google
what.?
17,10 and 21 can't be the sides of a right angled triangle
17^2+10^2≠21^2
That was what i was saying
Ohhhhh i didnt understand you
The perpendicular doesn't split the side as 6:15
so 10 must be incorrect?
The question is wrong
i swear it was like that
thank you for explaining
i swear it is something wrong with it
Ironic
because they all got 84cm2
So it must be like that
should*
Yeah, but if two sides of your right angle triangle is 17 and 21, the third side is √152 not 10
Exactly
There is no right angled triangle with one side being 17, hypotenuse being 21 AND the perpendicular splits the hypotenuse as 6:15
If you copied the question correctly your teacher should give you free marks
Niceee
Im 10000%
lol
Lmao
How can i prove it to the teacher if he says im speaking nonsense?
like can i draw it somehow or something?
show him that b=10 by your method, then apply Pythagoras on the whole triangle ABC and show him that b=√152.
So either √152=10 or the perpendicular doesn't divide the hypotenuse as 6:15
Ask him to choose
is CA and the perpendicular line to AB the unknowns?
yeah the given values arent accurate
u can argue that the ratios of the given side lengths of the triangles arent in proportion, when they must be since the 3 right triangles must be similar
I could use some help with this here. This is calculating light ray reflections using vector fields to simulate light rays. The issue I am having is solving for the function regarding reflection angle. However I have such defined though inside it, is another function that measures the angle from the reflection vector to 2pi. I have drawn out a table and a graph of what the graph looks like according to the table. As to how I got these values, I just used my intuition as to what the reflection angle would actually be when the surface is angled at certain angles. The function is taking in a input of a angle, which goes from the normal vector to the X-axis. I need help finding this function F.
is euclidean geometry really much harder than the geometry for A level maths
i took that topic over the summer
is basically honors geometry i'm not sure if is hard but it was kinda confusing
is there an efficient method to memorize the xy coordinates of a unit circle? especially regarding the irrational values
well for 1 u only gotta memorize one corner
easiest is top right
because then u can just do some flipping to get other corners
and for the angles just know that 2pi is a circle so therefore pi is a circle and all that
and for the 30 degree and the 60 degree angles
what i do to remember them is only remember the 30 degree one
because i can just flip the x and y coords to get the 60 degree one
I was confused on how the measurements become square roots
i cant explain why its exactly sqrt3 and sqrt2
but you know that
the points represent the x line of the triangle and y line of the triangle
where the hypotenuse is 1 (length of unit circle)
and pythag theorem is a^2+b^2=c^2
so if u do some shifting and stuff u end up with square roots
got it, thank you!
np
Has anyone read Elementary Geometry from an Advanced standpoint by Edwin Moise. I was wondering if this book would give me a good grasp on Geometry and Trigonometry or if I should buy a sepereate Trignoemetry book
Google exact value triangles. Then to find any point just do (cos(x),sin(x)) using those triangles.
Also if you are new to trig (which I get the feeling you are), learning exact value triangles is more important than knowing each point on the unit circle.
Im struggling to understand why I cant give answers to trigonometry questions in decimal form.
Example.
Calculate the area of a triangle where each sides length is sqr(3) and the angles are all 60.
My answer ends up at 1.2990381
Which is correct
BUT
They want me to basically answer
(3*sqr(3)) / 4
Why is this? I don't know how to convert the decimal 1.2990381 to 3 times square root of 3 divided by 4
you are probably supposed to get the exact answer by not using a calculator and just manipulating the surds
the answer is 1/2 sqrt(3) * sqrt(3) sin 60
and sin 60 = sqrt(3) / 2
so you can simplify
Can we define a 3d vector with just the direction cosines?
Update: Yup, the teacher accidentally put the square on the top, so it should not be a right triangle. He said he will take 84 and 85 as a correct answer. No bonus for figuring it out though. Im very happy anyways!
How do u do tolerance
say you had a diagram like below. How would you take moments from bottom to top and vice versa for the wall one. Is there like a formula.
so solve the theta?
can a kite have parallel sides
kite does have parallel sides i believe
would you say that’s a always sometimes or never statement
ok because I put never on my quiz lol
I've posted and discussed it here before, but now I did get a response from the teacher. So, you're supposed to compare the volume of the box (assuming width=height) and the volume of ellipsoid... Now, I've learned that the statement by my teacher, "if volume of shape_A < shape_B, then shape_A fits" is not valid for all problem, now we've got an ellipsoid. How do u even make an ellipsoid hole on the ground
a kite never has parallel opposite sides
not this question again gawd😭😭😭
fr
whag math class are u talking
yea they dont
taking
ok good thanks
I either completely misunderstood this or the process we were instructed to see if box fits is just utterly ridiculous
what math class is that problem from
conic sections
ummm what’s that
A conic section, conic or a quadratic curve is a curve obtained from a cone's surface intersecting a plane. The three types of conic section are the hyperbola, the parabola, and the ellipse; the circle is a special case of the ellipse, though it was sometimes called as a fourth type.
Wiki
oh gotcha
does anyone wanna take a stab at this proof??? my teacher said that the point of doing it was to do it without using isosceles trapezoid conjectures for example the isosceles trapezoid diagonals conjecture
it’s for extra credit and I need the answer
also another way to help is through using this combo move where you relate the points on the unit circle to 45 45 90 triangles and 30 60 90 triangles
F but next time instead of memorizing (cos, sin) try thinking of it like making a right triangle with the hypotenuse being your radius, and theta being the angle closest to the center of the circle and the right angle being at the bottom right, and finding the side lengths of each of the legs will give you cos for the x leg, and sin for the y leg
like instead of straight up memorizing everything try to find where they come from first
Hey can anyone help me with proofs?
just ask it
What do you ean by that?
ask ur question
i mean
never
ask if i cant get help
jusr directly ask ur question
and if u dont do that ur banned🔫
I finally get troposphere's solution to it weeks ago
the dimensions can be strecthed to transform the shapes to circle and a square
@grave pond thanks for the solution a few weeks ago (sorry for the ping, just a relief from the problem)
but if a rectangle or a square is placed at the origin, would the origin always be the midpoint of the diagonal?
I guess so, if we use the midpoint formula for coordinates
wtf
Not necessarily, but if the midpoint of the rectangle is not at the center of the ellipse, you can slide the rectangle closer to the center without hitting the opposite side of the ellipse.
So the rectangle fits at all if and only it fits in the middle.
I need a refresher in the basics of geometry, does anyone know any good books or sites?
any idea how i'd go about solving this
is that sinC + cosC =1 or sinC + CcosC = 1
evan chen's Euclidean Geometry
@quaint sinew Hint: ||divide whole equation by sqrt(2)||
Anyone know if there's anywhere to get Algebra and Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry 13th addition free?
we dont help ppl with pirating things
oh mb
I need help with my geometry
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
i dont think this is geometry
How do I do that?
Nvm I found out
What's the best way to learn the entire geometry unit? Tutor, online (youtube/khan academy/online textbook), or zmth else
Cause I'm skipping from alg to alg 2 and need to self teach myself geo
get a textbook if u can and use youtube and khan academy if u stuck on something and if u really dont get something then you might needa tutor
Ah, I see. But, will the condition, "if the diagonal of a rectangle or square is less than the diameter of the circle, then it fits," be valid?
so, like regardless of how it would be placed in the circle, whether centered or not so centered
Yes, that's exactly it.
ohh omg, thx so much!!
Thanks
how do i calculate h in the pyramid on the left?
if a line, A(x1,y1)B(x2,y2) is divided in a proportion of m1:m2 at the point P
Coordinate of P
= [ {(x1m2 + x2m1) / (m1+m2)},
{(y1m2 + y2m1) / (m1+m2)} ]
would i be right here
yea
so this was my full solution regarding it
However, when I compare the ratio of the scaled shapes' volume (assuming that before scaling, width = height) to the ratio of scaled shapes' area, I couldnt get the same answer
So idk if this one is correct
what is my teacher saying
the thing she wants us to do for SSA is check how many cases there are (0,1,2) BEFORE we actually solve
fine
but the handout she gave us says
that the only two solution case is a<b and a>h
aka h<a<b
(we are given A,b,a and h=bsinA)
???
b is less than a here
yeah then there is no ambiguous case for this triangle
yeah
ok the conditions she gave for A is right or obtuse are:
a leq b -> no solution
a > b -> one solution
are these correct
ok
this is correct
the other solutions for this will give A is acute
also you can never have more than two possible triangles for SSA if you've noticed
it has to do with the fact that sin(x) = c only has two or fewer solutions (if 0 <= x <= 180 deg)
yes a circle and a line can't have more than two intersections
interesting
?
yeah I presume your geometry class doesn't think of this using trig
as in sine rule, cosine rule
ok thanks
no worries
Greetings. I'm 13 years old, I'm in 7th grade and I started studying geometry, but I don't really understand what should I do?
study
khan acadmey
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Triangle ABC has AB = 15, BC = 13, and AC = 14. Let O be the orthocenter of this triangle, and let the reflections from the orthocenter across sides AB, BC, and AC be points D, E, and F, respectively. Find the area of ADBECF.
have you made a diagram?
with geogebra
i mean it’s labeled wrong but sure we can use it
yeah
the labeling was annoying
i didnt want to construct all of this with a compass
in the car rn so a bit hard to think about it
let’s see
if you can find the diameter, you should be able to do anything you want
can somebody explain to me why exactly it holds for all numbers of the form n = 3 x 2^m? i tried it for example with 3 x 2^2 = 12, which gives pi/6
and can't really see the connection
oh it should just be 2(84) = 168
if AB = 1/3BC then AB = 1/4AC
Now we just solve like normal
6-2 = 4
4/4 = 1
1 + 2 = 3
x is 3
1-(-7) = 8
8/4 = 2
y is -5
if im not wrong
I’m really confuse
use similarity on the last one
how would i solve #2
have u tried drawing any diagram
wdym
a diagram?
What about the others
Bro tbh I really don’t understand what that even means
Like I have 0 knowledge on this topic
@thick fable
u should watch any tutorial on it then
lmao chill im here only
My fault
u can just watch any on yt sorry im not on my laptop rn, so im not gonna do it, its very hectic yk
but there r
a lot of them on yt
just search similarity in triangles
nice
?
it should be 9+ alpha
okay did u watch any video?
well okay
so
yk that triangle HDM is similar to triangle HTN
right?
@upper karma
Mhm
Alr
what is that
yea
This math video tutorial discusses similar triangles and how to use proportions to find the missing side and solve for x. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems.
Polygons: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_-3ulbtcLk
Quadrilaterals: ...
watch this man
thats the one i watch
lmao
well only the frst clip
first*
bruh i hve no time to watch that long video
lterally do in 30 min
oh nah my grade bout to drop
damn
if it is so, then just plug ur values in here and get the answer
wtf is this man
YOU TOLD ME TO DO THAT
WHY CANT U JUST SAY IT
SAY WHAT
like bro im obviously sturggling
NAH
THE DAMN ANSWER
IVE BEEN SITTING HERE FOR 1 HOUR
ON ONE QUESTION
I AINT TELLING NO ANSWER
LMAOOOOOO
ALRIGHT what
look bro like u gotta understand my sitation
i have 0 tme
time
to watch a video
im trying to do my best
alr dawg
just for you
im here on my pc now
okay wait
i wanna know how did u got that
oh thank you bro i apperiacte it
the one with the racket in his hand right
yea
,, \frac{6}{9+6}=\frac{0.9}{x}
यजतलमाओ
now u just simplify for x
do i add 9+6
so i add it?
i did 6 * x. which equals 6x
then i did 9+6
which is 15
then i did 15*0.9
which is 13.5
then
,w 15*0.9/6
im going to attempt the 2nd problem i'll tell u if i need help
use help channels for it
Wait bro
Ah damn
Anytime I post on the bell channels no one even says anything
Help*
Hmm Alr
umm guys I need help right now
Diameter of cylinder A is 7 cm and the height is 14 cm. Diameter of cylinder B is 14 cm and height is 7 cm. Without doing any calculations can you suggest whose volume is greater? Verify it by finding the volume of both the cylinders. Check whether the cylinder with greater volume also has greater surface area
What’s the formula for volume? Given this, which would affect the volume more
pi(r)^2 *h
@wintry aurora Greater the Volume also has greater Surface area
I guess cylinder B will have a greater volume because in the formula for finding the volume of a cylinder the radius is squared and thus the increase in radius would be more effective than the increase or decrease in height
@upper karma which grade r u in
Guys! I always wonder how the angle between the line of vision of the viewer and the top of a tall object is measured is there a technique or a particular device for it? anybody has any idea about it?
that is just trigonometry
Ik but how can you measure the angle between a tall building and your eye without knowing the height of that building.
Can you pls explain it to me?
protractor
I'd recommend a sextant rather than a protractor.
(in)clinometer
this might be better suited for #linear-algebra but how would I go about finding the difference in coordinates of the two ends of an arc of a circle, assuming I have the length and the radius of the circle, and the coordinates of the first point
I mention linear algebra because technically I'm using vectors for all this - I'm writing a program where I have an object at a coordinate (which c# stores coordinates through x and y components of vectors), and need the object to move around a circle at a given speed.
What is it
literally my geometry teacher doesnt even teach so idk how to help
Use inverse trig
what's inverse trig
It's how you solve for angles instead of side lengths
huh
My geometry teacher is getting to the point that she can't even teach properly anymore. She's allegedly retiring at the end of this year. The entire class is stuck on translating shapes even though we're in quarter two.
i mean i've learnt it it just idk what to use
i've used both and didn't get the answer
Try this video
Learn how to solve for the lengths of the sides and the measures of the angles of a triangle using the law of cosines. The law of cosines is used in determining the lengths of the sides or the measures of the angles of a triangle when no angle measure and the length of the side opposite the angle are both known.
The law of cosines can be used ...



