#help-49
1 messages · Page 284 of 1
any idea why my final expression is incorrect?
i have a minterm 00x, so ~x1~x2, as well as minterm xx1, so x3
but the expression doesn't match the truth table
x3 would give you 1 on input of 101
yeah, not supposed to happen
so you have an extra 1 in the bottom right of your kmap
that horizontal group of 3 doesn't give one minterm
what do you mean?
why isn't the group on the second row maximized to 1x3?
i think you meant bottom left, which was why i got confused
what do you mean maximized
0 0 0 0
1 1 1 0
tell me what minterm gives this map
no, bottom right.
huh
x3
since the first two terms are changing, and the third term is stable
and since it's stable as 1, so it's x3
actually what
if x3 is 1 then the rectangle should be 1x3, not 1x4
so i need to break it down into two rectangles...?
oh
Minterm groups must be rectangular and must have an area that is a power of two (i.e., 1, 2, 4, 8...)
yes
if the area of one minterm should be a power of two, that means each side dimension should also be power of twos
and clearly 3x1 doesn't fit the bill
anyway thanks
.close
Closed by @rain wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Consider the Prokhorov metric: $$\tilde{\rho}(\mathbb{P},\mathbb{Q}) = \inf\bigl{ \delta>0 : \mathbb{P}(A) \le \mathbb{Q}(A^\delta) + \delta ;\text{and}; \mathbb{Q}(A) \le \mathbb{P}(A^\delta) + \delta ;\text{for all Borel } A \bigr}.$$ In the above theorem, what do they mean by a diagonal argument?
psie
$\tilde{\rho}(\mathbb{P}_n,\mathbb{P})\to0$ is saying that $\mathbb{P}_n(A) \le \mathbb{P}(A^{\epsilon}) + \epsilon$ for all $\epsilon>0$ and $n$ sufficiently large (and all Borel $A$). The fact that we have an $n$ dependence here drives me a little nutty.
psie
Basically you have a kind of "double limit"
You have, in parallel to this, that $\mu(A^\epsilon)\to \mu(A)$ as $\epsilon \to 0$
Rafilouyear2026
Indeed, continuity from above.
From this, you can already write $\limsup_n \mu_n(A) \leq \mu(A^\epsilon) +\epsilon$ for all $\epsilon > 0$
Rafilouyear2026
So you can take the limit of the right hand side as epsilon -> 0
Hmm, ok. I thought n has an epsilon dependence, but maybe the order in which you take the operations makes this dependence irrelevant.
The inequality I posted only holds for $n>N_\epsilon$.
psie
Yeah, but once you take the limsup, there is no dependence on epsilon anymore
If you start behaving like [good property] after some rank
Nevermind that the rank depends on epsilon
The limsup is the biggest behavior at "infinity"
So it also takes the good property
And removes the dependence in epsilon
Ah, ok. Makes sense.
Thank you.
As for the original argument, I can only think it's lacking some subsequence on the index of mu
Hmm, yeah.
$\mu_{\phi(n)}(A) \leq \mu(A^{\epsilon_n}) + \epsilon_n$
Rafilouyear2026
That's easier, take any sequence epsilon_n that decreases to 0, like 1/n
Then phi(n) is gonna be your "N(epsilon_n)", so your N(n)
Ok.
Well you need to failproof it a little bit by adding that phi(n+1) can't be smaller than phi(n)
So phi(n+1) = max(phi(n)+1, N(n+1))
And we're done
Since there's a subsequence of mu_n that follows that pattern
Mmmh, wait
Ok no I've been taking it the wrong way around
You might be able to find some epsilon_n that works
If you take $\epsilon_n = \inf{\epsilon > 0: :\forall k\geq n, \mu_k(A) \leq \mu(A^\epsilon) + \epsilon}$
Rafilouyear2026
The set is not empty because epsilon = 1 is in it
It is non-increasing
So converges, and if it converges to epsilon > 0
Then applying the property to epsilon/2 yields a contradiction
So it converges to 0
But your argument works as well, right? I.e. taking limsup first and then epsilon to 0.
Yes
Funnily enough, I'm in a "limit theorems" class right now
.close
Closed by @inland patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
reupload cuz my wifi was gone
whats ur current progress?
2-2cos^2 is sin^2
that'd remove the +2
then I'd try to expand sin(2x) and cos(4x)
and then it'll hopefully be factorable
hmm
just tried putting it to wolfram alpha
you'd need to solve a 7th degree polynomial
seems like it doesnt have nice sols
my math teacher said we can factorize it
if i was mistaken one of the sol is cosx= -1/2 or 1/2
but still
idk how
maybe i miscopied sth
my input seems correct
unless these are multiplications
which they shouldnt be but idk
well no multiplication
then the question is wrong ig
no general solutions
hm..
doesnt look like it
the sqrt3 says transform to sin(x+pi/6)
already tried
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
oh
yh
most simplified
$2\sin(\frac{\pi}{6}+x)+2\sin(2x-\frac{\pi}{6})-4\cos(4x)\cos(x)+1=0$
scoob
ask
he is sleeping bruh
leave it
my class gonna start tmr i will ask him
@median holly Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What algebraic manipulations have you done?
Doesn't partial fraction only work for rational functions
I mean the idea works for anything
Separate the denominator and see where that gets you
huhh
i didnt think of that
alr then ty
.close
Closed by @woeful turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
haha this one was funny
what is funny about it sir
i didnt expect the partial fractions when i started
bro but it was kinda funny cause i got the answer without integrating
yeahhh
yea lmao
bruh
anymore proofs to show us lol
their cooking 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I show equivalence between (0,1) and [0,1]
Are you trying to show they have the same cardinality
Do you need to construct an explicit bijection or can u use e.g. cantor schroder berstein and only construct an injection both ways
Yes I think, I just need to show the existence of one and not explicitly construct one
and do you know cantor schroder berstein theorem? It allows you to prove that 2 sets A,B are of the same cardinality just by constructing 2 injections A->B and B->A
yes I know that
I need the injective map [0,1] \to (0,1) because the other direction i can very well use the identity map
try making the map to first shrink the interval to some smaller one
and then shift that interval so that it fits inside (0,1)
would u know how to make an injective map to sth like [0, 1/2]?
that'd be to [1/2, 1]
but yeah, why not
now just shift it to fit inside (0,1) and youre done
yeah, or 1/4 + x/2
hmm
there is also a way to make an explicit bijection (there is an analogy with hilberts hotel), but this double injection is simpler
tell me the analogy as well
we first start by sending everyone from (0, 1) to their room number
but since we want [0,1] -> (0,1), there are 2 "guests" left
0 and 1
so we can send 0 e.g. to room 1/2
but then we need to send guest 1/2 elsewhere
so we send him to 1/4
then we need to send 1/4 elsewhere
so we send him to 1/8
...
and every guest finds their room, and 0 now has a room
you can similarly send 1 to 3/4, 3/4 to 7/8, ...
and therefore accomodate the second guest as well
makes sense
you can basically pick a countable sub-hotel of the uncountable (0,1) hotel and that countable sub-hotel behaves exactly like hilberts hotel
np
.close
Closed by @obsidian glen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to solve a problem that's either optimization or curve fitting.
A user comes to me with a list of ratings (from 0 to 100%) they've given to a bunch of books. Each book has several themes, each with a percentage (e.g. Sci-fi 22%, Drama 20%, Mystery 19%, Comedy 16%, Romance 15%, Crime 8%). These themes are not chosen by the user.
My goal is to return to them a list of their preferences for each theme from -10 to 10.
The way the preferences work is that each book has a base rating (from 0 to 100%, not given by the user) and this is multiplied by 1.02^total preference, where total preference for a book is the sum of each theme's preference multiplied by how much that theme applies to the book.
One problem is that the rating resulting from this is not similar to the rating given by a user, and so the resulting batch would need to go through normalization before being compared to the user ratings.
At the end of that, I'm trying to find a way to minimize the (square) differences between the ratings given by the calculated preferences and the ratings given by the user.
Is there any sort of algorithm that works for that?
@ruby latch Has your question been resolved?
For curve fitting problems, the best lead I could find was the Gauss-Newton method, but that seems to be for finding a function f for y=f(x), where x and y are real numbers.
But for me, only y is a real number, and x is a vector, I guess? I'm not sure if x has to be a real number.
But what seems like a larger problem is that I don't think my function is differentiable, so the method doesn't work?
Since, sure, for simplicity let's say there's 3 themes.
The function would be y = r * 1.02^(P_1 * T_1 + P_2 * T_2 + P_3 * T_3), and like maybe finding P_1, P_2, and P_3 would be similar to finding a, b, and c in y = ax^2 + bx + c.
But then the normalization step, which is very necessary, is no longer a function of a single book and preferences.
I guess I could always brute force it by looping through each preference and calculating the MSE for each of the 21 values it could be in until no more improvements can be made.
That would make the (probably false) assumption that each preference has an independent effect on the result, but I imagine it wouldn't be too far off the mark.
I could even optimize in groups of 4 or 5, which would probably finish in time.
@ruby latch Has your question been resolved?
@ruby latch Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @ruby latch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I need help on this
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A silly question, how would you find the 40th decimal place of 11/57
W/o a calculator
Find the period in the decimal composition by making the euclidean division of 11 * 10^n by 57 repeatedly, and then apply for the right number of periods
hmm
Probably first find the period where it repeats, then repeat that period as many times as fits into 40 (GCD) and then count in the remaining period? 
Not the most effecient.
Yeah I see, I just have no idea how to find the period 
I rely too much on calculator I have no idea how to do division now
Idk the carracterisation of it
It just is <57
so I just take a random n then do division until it repeat?
You start for n=0,1,... util it repeat itself
if you do the division by hand like you did in fourth grade then you will realize that it is the same as computing 11*10^n mod 57
- you want the quotient not the rest
hence this is essentially the order of 10 mod 57
which you can compute in various way
This
all somewhat painful
This
phi(57)=36 so you would only need to test n that are divisors of 36
but there are so many of those
hang on hang on gimme a min, I have never taken a proper number theory class these euclidean division and phi terms are kinda confusing to me
Gimme a min
do this
like actually do it
at least three steps
of each
OHHHH
I see
I just remembered how to do division with decimal
wait how would I know when it repeat
when 11*10^n = 11 mod 57 again
do it yourself 🫠 🫠
ws joking
Okay okay
oh wait
Does the phi thing
It means the period of smth when doing mod right?
OHHHH
I seee
I see how that works
Tyyy
well more or less
its guaranteed to be a multiple of the period
due to general group theory
Okay I have no idea what that is
I might have to work on my number theory skill
But ty
.close
Closed by @vivid yoke
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
When does $\frac{3^{11n}-17}{2^{11n}-17} \in \mathbb{N}$ for $n \in \mathbb{N}$.
CherryMan
we found that n is even and were trying some size arguments
$S = \frac{3^{11n}-17}{2^{11n}-17}$ then $S - \left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^{11n}$ converges to 0. So for large enough n it is never an integer
CherryMan
maybe
i already said this
n evne
what im trying to do is find a number that is a factor of the denominator but not the numerator
i tried that for 3,5,7,11
only found conditions on n
like n is not congruent to 2 mod 3 or not congruent to 9 mod 10
there has to be a better way
theres gotta be a trick
n even because otherwise the denominator is div by 3 but the numerator is never divisible by 3
let's just write down that n = 0 is a solution
just have that there
<@&268886789983436800>
my god this is annoying
right this shouldnt be so difficult
im going to try mod 10
yh graph says
mod 7 does something
GODDAMNIT
numerator also divisible by 7
oh my god
lel
tried mod 14, also did nothing
@signal ibex does this work or is it faulty
i dont think that works
n can't be 3 or 9 mod 9
mod 18, that leaves us with candidates
2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 16
the move might be to test out the powers of 3
there's gotta be a better way
since 11 is in the exponent, did you try mod 11
can't be 9 mod 11
how does that make sense
$3^{11} \equiv ? \mod{11}$
riemann
3^n is surely easier to deal with than 3^(11n)
2^11 is 2 mod 11
and 17 is 6...
yeah this does the job
the denominator is always 0 mod 2 but the numerator never is
mod 22 i think is the test we need for the original problem
why is the denminator always 0
2^n - 6
then?
thats always even
bruh that means its 11k + (2^n -6)
right
we cant say for sure that its even or not right?
that is true
@graceful drum Has your question been resolved?
@graceful drum Has your question been resolved?
Isn't this good?
no cus the fractional part of (3/2)^n may be very small always
always smaller than how close the difference is
right
ofc that it's when $2^{11n} - 17 \mid 3^{11n} - 17$
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
just need to grind some info on this
kek
got this so far
i think literally all of that screenshot is wrong
maybe we can let this be an integer
rearrange to get
then do modulo some number to find a contradiction
most likely 17
double check that picture
if this is correct, there are at most 289 combinations to check
@graceful drum Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can we show that set of all rational numbers can be written as like rigorous proof
,rccw
one direction of the inclusion should be trivial
What that means?
a common way to show two sets A and B are equal is to show A ⊆ B and A ⊇ B
plante is saying that one of these is trivial
OK then why we need to prove two set equal right here
actually I don't understand question right here also can you explain that
hm well what's confusing you the most
Hmm all of that means what we're trying do right here
We've gotta have some idea what you know / don't know
We know that the set of all rational numbers can be written like this but how we can prove like rigorously and someone has told me that one of that is trivial (equality of sets) but how?
take arbitrary elements from each and show that they are necessarily in the other set
do this both ways and you establish equality
@untold dirge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @untold dirge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Am I tripping or it this just $\int_{0}^{1} \frac{(1-x)^{10}}{\sqrt{x}}dx$
wai
Believe so yeah
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
braids have analogies with basic algebra ?
for example, 1+1, or a(b+c), multiplication, addition, axioms, small lemmas have analogues?
distributivity, and so on
for example have two parallel strings = is 0? and +1 is ⤬ ?
═ • ⤬ = ═ ?
⤬ + ⤬ = ⤬⤬ ?
What is ⤬•⤬
@shut canyon Has your question been resolved?

how are you defining multiplication and addition
braids have a natural composition by drawing them left to right and then "straightening" the strings
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,tex
Hi there. is the negation of the first statement correct?
\vspace{0.15cm}
$\lim_{x\to \infty} f(x) = l \implies \forall \epsilon >0 ,\exists M>0 : x>M \implies \lvert f(x) -l\rvert <\epsilon $
\vspace{0.24cm}
$\lim_{x\to\infty } f(x) \neq l \implies \exists \epsilon >0 \ \text{s.t.} \ \forall M>0 : x>M \ \text{and} \ \lvert f(x) -l\rvert >\epsilon $
fijokazż
Missing a ∃ before x>M
Closed by @coral belfry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I differentiated the equation and got f'(x)<0 , so 1 root but the answer given is 2 roots
와
?
Can you show your work?
f'(x) = -3/(1+x)⁴-3-cosx <0
Hm
well
f(x) is not continuous on R
If you compute lim f(x) when x approaches -1 from the right and from the left you will understand why
Also, make a rough sketch
@tardy bloom Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the number of permutations of n different things taken r at a time such that 3 specific things occur together.
i took out the combination to be (n-3) C (r-3) and then the ways these 3 objects can be arranged is 3!
im still missing a part
do you mean:
find the number of permutations of 52 different cards taken 5 at a time such that you have the ace, king, and queen of hearts?
no the question is find the number of permutations of n distinct things taken r together in which that 3 particular things must occur together.
For now you only have the number of combinations of r objects
We need number of permutations right?
yes
Wait
"Occur together" like they're next to each other ?
Is this what you meant?
Or those 3 objects just have to be in r objects we have chosen
yeah this one
is there any other context? perhaps showing the original question would be better.
Are you sure "permutation" is the exact wording, and not something like "find the number of ways to put n different things in groups of r such that 3 specific things are in the same group"?
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
ok, weird wording coming from the book but ok
and no idea if the order of the groups of r matters or not
When in doubt, do both 
the solution i can send asw
if it helps
3! * (n-3) C (r-3) * (r-2)!
I did not understand how the (r-2)! came
Oh they meant this
Those 3 objects have to go together, like O1-O2-O3
No? they multiply by (r-2)!
And also 3!
Ig 3! Is for the permutations of those 3 objects
And (r-2)! Is for the permutations of (r-2) objects ( treat those 3 specific objects as one )
So the wording is completely wrong
It should be "how many ways to arrange r elements picked from a set of n elements, such that 3 specific elements are together"
@thorny pelican do you understand the question better once written that way
oh
alright
thanks
wait
so why are we treating the 3 objects as one
is it because it is compulsory to take those 3
Those 3 are determined to be together
so once you've chosen the other r-3 objects to arrange
The arrangement has to be like [random object] [random object] .... [random object] [ordered group of 3 objects together] [random object] ...
so if you treat the ordered group of those 3 as a single thing
ohh yeah
you have r-2 things to order
Closed by @thorny pelican
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Any ideas on how to do this?
also if I do (b) do I even need to bother doing (a)
you could start with an example
@hybrid crow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800> spam
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is my proof correct?
Maybe I should've added "through transversals" for the first reason, and I think that saying the measure of angle A was equal to itself was redundant because the last line right after it didn't need it to complete the proof, if my proof even answers the original question (which I'm not 100% sure if that's what it's asking for).
I feel like you stopped short of proving what rhe question is asking you for
Like tou are meant to show AD/DB = AE/EC right
Also yes it is redundant bcuz u only need two pairs
Yep I unpaused the video and that's what was being asked apparently, unfortunately I misinterpreted the question.
Right
Tyvm!
.close
Closed by @small warren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800> unsolicited philanthropy
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
break into cases: when both are positive, what is ab? when both are negative, what is ab? when one is pos and one is neg, what is ab?
?
for the first case, if a and b are positive, meaning $a>0$ and $b>0$, then $ab>0$ (this property might be in your notes or something like it), meaning $ab\neq0$
JamR_71111
ah should have asked, let me see
Okay, I think I remember how to deal with this in a general field
ty mods
split into cases 1) $a=0$ and 2) $a\neq0$
JamR_71111
the $a=0$ case is simple but $a\neq0$ requires using the axiom about multiplicative inverses
JamR_71111
i dont think i can split into cases tho
bcz that's my implication
it would work if it said "if a = 0 or b = 0, then ab = 0"
no matter which way youre doing this, you need to consider the nonzero stuff
going this way would consider zeros only, you gotta think of positive/negative to go the other way
the set-up here is that for any given field, an element a in that field must be either 0 or not 0
if we split it into the two cases, what we want to show is that if a isn't 0, then b must be
thats why this will work
they aren't working with an ordered field so the standard pos/neg thing doesnt work
do i have to show that they are both 0?
all you have to show is that at least one of them has to be
that if one of them isn't, then the other is
do you want me to get you going a bit further than the vague set-up
assume $a \neq 0$, then we can do $\frac{1}{a} \cdot (ab) \implies (\frac{1}{a} \cdot a) \cdot b \implies 1 \cdot b \implies b$.
from the question, we have $ab = 0$, so $\frac{1}{a} \cdot (ab) \implies \frac{1}{a} \cdot 0 \implies 0 = b$
joseph
is this ok?
a bit messy with the $\Rightarrow$'s, but yes that's exactly the standard way to show it
JamR_71111
okay, so do i have to show when a = 0?
or can i just leave it at that and say something like
WLOG lol
WLOG, assume $a \neq 0$
joseph
you've already shown $a\neq0\Rightarrow b=0$ and certainly $a=0\Rightarrow a=0,$ so you've already done the only two possible cases $a=0$ or $a\neq0$
JamR_71111
ahh
dont even need a WLOG since it's all on that $a\neq0\Rightarrow b=0$
okok
JamR_71111
thank you
Np
.close
Closed by @outer copper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is essentiallly a definition
what im guessing is to find the instantaneous rate of change at -1.999... and at -2.001
is my guess
Althought it requires some testing
yea
theres also the possibility of checking using the 2nd derivative
given this is a polynomial
this is advanced functions so we havent done derivatives yet 
im taking calc next semester tho
yuh i know like the basic stuff for derivatives but my teacher wants us to do it some other wack
way
its so annoying
@storm sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @storm sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is the first option to a question. it has 4 options and asks which of the following is true, only one option is correct. all of them felt seemingly correct, it gave result to this question as well in the option. the option felt correct but its not correct, looking at the solutions gives me some hints to how limits questions are supposed to be proceeded.
i would like to see how limits work
provide with a soln as in how you would proceed to solve this question
what's the original question?
the questions asks which of the following options are correct.
gimme a min
ill send
alright, why do you think option A is correct?
oh that's so tricky, I see
i think because the argument will tend to 1
consider the domain of that function
domain of cosec inverse
the important thing is that as $x \to \infty$, $\frac{3x^2 - 4x + 2}{3x^2 + x + 7}$ approaches $1$ from below
yes
south
therefore cosec inverse of this does not exist
cosec inverse of 1 exists, but 1 is never attained
so from which side is the argument tending towards 1
from below, so 0.9, 0.99, 0.999...
exactly
yes, so the right-hand side of x = 1 does not exist
it's not in the domain
but the left-hand side exists (and it's continuous)
so yes, the limit exists as a one-sided limit
@tawny tiger Has your question been resolved?
Third option I think I am missing something not sure how to proceed
For the fourth option I am stuck here
[
\lim_{x \to inf}
\left[
x\left{
\left(1+\frac{2}{x}\right)^{\frac{1}{5}}
\left(1+\frac{1}{x}\right)^{\frac{1}{4}}
\right}
\right]
\left[
\frac{20 + \frac{1}{\pi x^5}}{3 + \frac{1}{x^5}}
\right]
]
CriTiCABLE
$(1 + h)^n \approx 1 + nh$ for $h \to 0$
south
for the third option, you'll need $\frac{\sin x}{x} \approx 1 - \frac{x^2}{6}$
now how about with $x \mapsto 1/x$?
south
it's easy after you apply it
what do we do with the last term
you can just take it as 20/3
no
sorry 1
yeah 1, now that's correct
i took 2/3 by mistake
Closed by @tawny tiger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
third one is tricky, so okay use this fact
then what I mean is $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1}{x^2} - \frac{1}{\sin^2 x}$
south
no worries!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why does center of mass / centroid exist? (im okay with assuming uniform distribution). Center of mass apparently has this property that we can balance stuff on it, mathematically, that'd mean that if we draw any line through the COM, the torques (sums of distances to the line * mass) on both sides are equal.
Now why should a point which satisfies this property exist? If we took torque to be only dependent on mass, then the corresponding balancing statement would be that areas on both sides of any line passing through the COM are equal, and such a COM wouldnt exist for most shapes. So why does the normal COM exist? And why even is torque = distance * weight?
torque is not distance*mass
Oh, right, I should probably call it distance * weight then
my point is mainly why it should be proportional to distance
and not distance^2, or even no distance
i suppose that we could say that torque = distance * force by definition, but in that case, why should 0 total torque mean that the object wont rotate / tilt
it is like pushing this door. the door rotates about the left vertical axis (the hinge axis). if u take the moment about that axis and push the door on that same axis u get that the force vector is parallel to the displacement vector (we define the displacement vector as starting at any point on the hinge axis to ending at any point on the line of action by the force)
torque is the cross product r cross F
Hmm, i dont really see how this would imply that the torque is proportional to distance from axis of rotation. Why should the door accelerate (rotationally) twice as fast when i apply the force twice as far? Why not e.g. four times as fast?
i have a feeling that this comes down to experimental results and not a mathematical one
cause its directly proportional to r vector
yeah
hmm, that's possible
but i think
isnt torque defined as -F cross r vecor
this may have context
yes, from what i understand that definition is motivated by experimental results
makes sense
yeah, i get that, but why? Why should this definition correspond to how the object rotates? Why should 0 net torque imply it? Ig its gonna be just experimental
Alright, thanks, ill read it..
cause only perpendicular forces to the r vector can produce any rot. effects
Oh, it can also follow from newton's second law
o net torque implies-;
0 force
0 r vector
angle b/w the two vectors = 0
either of these 3
Alright, thanks everyone, this solves my second question
Why does center of mass / centroid exist? (im okay with assuming uniform distribution). Center of mass apparently has this property that we can balance stuff on it, mathematically, that'd mean that if we draw any line through the COM, the torques (sums of distances to the line * mass) on both sides are equal.
Now why should a point which satisfies this property exist? If we took "torque" to be only dependent on mass, then the corresponding balancing statement would be that areas on both sides of any line passing through the COM are equal, and such a COM wouldnt exist for most shapes. So why does the normal COM exist?
just reposting the first part of the question
@dreamy lichen Has your question been resolved?
i don't see why torque being only dependent on mass means the corresponding balancing statement might not have a solution
ah, you mean for all plumb lines
ok so this has to do with the fact that torque is linear
Oh, that actually kinda makes sense
is there any way to prove it using the fact that torque is linear?
i dont need a rigorous proof, im okay with some handwaving
Let $\mathbf{p}$ be a point. Let $\fn{\rho}{\bb{R}^3}{\bb{R}}$ be the density distribution of your object. Then net torque with respect to $\mathbf{p}$ is
\[ \tau_{\mathrm{net}} = \int \rho(\mathbf{q})(\mathbf{q}-\mathbf{p})\times\mathbf{g}\,d\mathbf{q} \]
and by linearity if you want $\tau_{\mathrm{net}} = 0$ you can distribute to get an equation for $\mathbf{p}$ which you can solve for:
\[ \int\rho(\mathbf{q})\mathbf{p}\,d\mathbf{q} = \int\rho(\mathbf{q})\mathbf{q}\,d\mathbf{q}. \]
g is gravity vector
What's p?
oh a point
im blind
Oh damn, i get it
i was focusing too much on balancing over a single line, but when we instead look at the torque as a vector and do all directions simultaneously, it becomes obvious by linearity
Closed by @dreamy lichen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i guess you have to show that vector valued integrals are independent of choice of basis
I'm probably going to accept that as intuitive enough for now
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I figure out f(x) ?
f(x) is y/x^2 right?
Closed by @floral ruin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
in terms of only x he was asking
not really u can reopen
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-49 message
yea I was confused in that way
i would break it as
f(x)+f(1/x) = (x^2-2)+ (1/x^2 -2)
do u see what im getting at
no sir bruh im younger than u lmao but nw
ayo cmon are you really younger than me? what is your age?
17
same 😭
o then mb
Closed by @floral ruin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why |P(A)|=2^{n}?
the quick and easy explanation is because to form a subset of A, for each element in A, you choose whether to include it or not in the subset - 2 choices.
since A has n elements (presumably), that's 2^n different combinations of inclusion/exclusion to make, which is exactly the cardinality of the power set of A
what's n
you mean the number of elements in A?
^
Yes
to make a subset of A you need to go through each element of A and answer the question "will it belong to my subset or not"
yes/no question => 2 options
2 * 2 * 2 * ... * 2 (n copies of 2)
which leads back to this
Ok but for example I could have {a} and {a,b}, aren't there 2 choices for a here?
these are two different sets
what's the point going on here
note that you have not specified what A is
you misunderstand
If A for example has 3 elements
Yes
Yes
then {a} and {a, b} correspond to {include, exclude, exclude} and {include, include, exclude} respectively
ok, then the subset {a} is represented by
Take a? YES
Take b? NO
Take c? NO
and {a,b} is represented by
Take a? YES
Take b? YES
Take c? NO
Yes
Ok
And on what basis does 2* 2*...*2 n times give me all the possible combinations?
do you know the multiplication rule in combinatorics
binomial is going too far
Combinations?
closer, but can you state the rule?
Since I can choose each element 2 times all combinations are given by 2^n I think
Oh yes
you are not choosing each element up to 2 times. you are given 2 choices for each element
correct, that is a better phrasing.
And then n times to have all those of A
Closed by @balmy cypress
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if the coil is perpendicular to the magnetic field it's emf is 0 right?
because on the answer key it says maximum but what I learned it's 0
yes
You're talking about flemings right hand rule and laws on electromagnetic induction right?
idk I dont memorise the name but it's like change in flux and emf
Yeah that is electromagnetic induction definition
so is it 0 when perpendicular the emf or maximum
no, rather maximum
You want a visual representation?
The visual representation will be on A.C generator sin wave
No no it's not like that, it is rate of change of magnetic flux
what
wait lemme show you the textbook version
Ys that exactly, look at the A.C graph when the coil rotates.
When the coil is perpendicular to the magnetic field , it is maximum and is the amplitude.
This wave occurs due to the slip rings of an A.C generator which reverse the current in armature coil
Thereby making this sine curve
Yes
I found a video it also says emf is zero but I'm confused cuz 3 people said its max and my answer key
No EMF is not zero, it is the highest peak of the curve
If EMF was zero, how can the coil turn.
There's a misunderstanding
Do you want me to guide through the working of the AC generator
look
Yep so emf according to that graph is 10 millivolts
it saisays time equals to 0 parallel and it's the max point on the graph
and it's 0 when perpendicular in the graph
The first option is wrong because at t = 0, coil must be perpendicular
chat gpt says its 0
my tea her said its 0
my quiz said its 0
but my course revision said its maximum
3 other people said maximum
Don't follow people, follow the concept what it says
donot follow gpt, it can make mistakes
Can you visualize the coil rotating?
I'll just try to look in my textbook to check thanks for helping
yes
I mean did you get the point?
no but I'll like try to understand
do you use the angle theta for the flux equation as the surface to the field or the normal of coil to the field
You can use this formula wait
it might be useful later
which
yeah wait a min
e=e_0 sin2πnt
This is the standard formula
e0 is the max emf induced, sin 2 x pi x n x t is complex but just remember sin theta
I said it is complex, did you learn this equation before
the one I did is I=Imaxsin(s pi frequency time)
that is maximum current induced
yes I did learn that
Oh great then you might be knowing it
but what does that have to do with the flux
this equation is in my textbook and I haven't learned it since it is complex and out of syllabi
Well that is the Law of electromagnetic induction by Faraday
Whenever there is a change in magnetic flux linked with a coil. an e.m.f is induced
Now I cannot explain why that happens, because it is a natural phenomena
sin 90 is 1, how can emf be 0
Do not follow those
I use the rule flux is equals to magnetic field times area time cosin theta
where theta is the angle between the normal to the surface and the field
Look I think we are not coming to a conclusion as you're having misunderstandings here
You can check the textbook definition and check back later
Yeah that might help
Do you want a AC generator visualize video?
no its ok I'll find it
. close
.close
Closed by @final girder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Alright have a nice day man
you too
that is right
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,tex
Hi there. For a sequence $b_n $ that converges to a non-zero real number b, i wanna prove that $\frac{1}{b_n} $ converges to $\frac{1}{b} $. Is this proof gud?
\vspace{0.15cm}
$\forall \epsilon >0 , \exists n_0 \in\mathbb{N} : n>n_0 \implies \lvert b_n -b\rvert <\epsilon $
\vspace{0.2cm}
We have that: $\lvert b_n\rvert > \frac{\lvert b\rvert }{2} , \forall n>n_0$
\vspace{0.12cm}
$\lvert \frac{1}{b_n} -\frac{1}{b} \rvert = \lvert \frac{b -b_n}{bb_n} \rvert \leq \frac{\lvert b_n-b \rvert }{\lvert b\rvert } \frac{2}{\lvert b\rvert } <\frac{2\epsilon }{b^2} $
\vspace{0.2cm}
So for $\epsilon ' = \frac{2\epsilon }{b^2} >0 : \ n>n_0 \implies \lim_{n\to\infty } \frac{1}{b_n} = \frac{1}{b} $
fijokazż
$\lvert b_n\rvert > \frac{\lvert b\rvert }{2} , \forall n>n_0$
What's your exact justification for that?
Rafilouyear2026
we can prove it using a different n_k but i just took the max of the two to skip the step
Also you seem to be using a lot of n_0's interchangeably even though they can differ from one property to another
ok but for which epsilon?
ok, so that's a bit that's missing
we alr had it proven in the notes so i didnt write it
i just took the maximum n_k such that both inequalities are true and called it n_0
my main problem is with whether i can just name a new epsilon to equal 2ε/b² and still say that we prove convergence
in the notes they do smth different i dont rember well
,tex
What they did in the notes was take an $n_1 $ such that $$n>n_1 \implies \ \lvert b_n -b \rvert < \frac{b^2 \epsilon }{2} $$ and then they started doing what i did. so in the end they just have $\lvert \frac{1}{b_n} -b^{-1} \rvert < \epsilon $ for a convenient choice of $n_k $
fijokazż
but i wonder if what i did is also fine
well anyway ill js do it the normal way if its in the exams
.close
Closed by @coral belfry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when dealing with this kind of problem, do i need to rearrange for the "there exists" variable? or is it the other way around
I don't understand what you mean; you can't really rearrange any of them.
@hoary hamlet Has your question been resolved?
pretty sure he means to convert a universal statement into existential one or the other way around
i dont think there is really any shortcut to thinking long and hard about these sorts of statements
so for example, for statement 3 they advised to rearrange in terms of y
the model answers
i meant the algebra sorry
bad wording from me
oh like solving the expression / equation given for one of the variables
sure, that could help
is there also methods or anything that could make my life easier
@hoary hamlet Has your question been resolved?
not directly related to problem solving per se, but having a solid foundation in logic wouldnt hurt
these typa problems are mathematical logic
https://richardhammack.github.io/BookOfProof/Main.pdf#page=46
chapter 2 of hammack's book of proof is good for this (i read the entire book before uni, its good for learning how to prove stuff)
beware that lots of things are in symbols tho
Closed by @hoary hamlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi. i need help with understanding something important. so, i was told that for any sequence a_n, f(a_n) is also a sequence, and not a function. that does make sense, but just now, i found on some notes, that a_n are functions N->R, and so that would make f(a_n) a function, too. My question is: when taking the limit of f(a_n), do we interpret it as a function, or as a sequence? im asking bc the epsilon definition of the limit may vary
you are correct, sequences are functions (with domain equal to the natural numbers)
alright. so lim_{n->infty} (f(a_n)) = l, how would we write that in a formal definition?
There is a different notion of limit for functions R -> R, which you might be getting confused with. Note functions R->R are different from functions that might give a sequence
i see
but it wouldn't make much sense to use epsilon/delta for them, because the "delta" is used when you make the "input" to the function approach some fixed number, which is not possible when the input values are constrained to be integers
so like $\lim_{n \to 1} a_n$ wouldn't make sense
Bungo
Closed by @coral belfry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I didn't understand, can someone explain it clearly?
I need an explanation like a explained to a donkey
@gray wave Has your question been resolved?
Is there a specific part you want to have explained or do you want a walkthrough of everything
@gray wave Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
everything
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
it's not divergent. what's wrong with my logic?
you are misusing the 1/x^p criterion
the criterion ``$p \le 1$ means divergent'' is for integrals of the form $$\int_1^\infty \frac{dx}{x^p}$$
cloud ☁
integrals from 0 to 1 have essentially the opposite convergence criterion: p >= 1 means divergent, p < 1 means convergent (you can prove this)
Closed by @tall lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
which do you think it is
hm
lowk no idea
Can you identify the equation that divides the two regions?
yeah no
do i gotta find rise/run
Not really.
Tbh you should probably go over basic functions / equations if you cant recognize this one
but its y = -x
any yt vid u recommne
no idea tbh
place three dots in the blue area in different quadrants
and see all of the 3 satisfies the inequality
what
so for example pick a dot in the blue area
i understand that y≥x means shade up and y≤x shade down
but here x is the first varaible
so is it the opposite
<@&268886789983436800> scam
but x is the first variable
understand that y≥x means shade up and y≤x shade down
but here x is the first varaible
so so its basically the opposite

