#help-49
1 messages · Page 246 of 1
never mind them
so in the 1 variable case, if we have the remainder for the degree two polynomial is $R_2(x)$, then $R_2$ should only have $x^3$ and higher order terms, so that
[ \lim_{x \to a} \frac{R_2(x)}{(x-a)^2} = \frac{f'''(Q)/3! \cdot (x-a)^3}{(x-a)^2} = 0 ]
this is basically saying that $R_2$ approaches $0$ ``faster'' than any quadratic
κλαουντ ☁ (cloud)
we're using essentially the same limit here except we replace [ (x-a)^2 \mapsto \norm{\vec x - \vec a}^2 = \norm{(x,y) - (a,b)}^2 ]
κλαουντ ☁ (cloud)
this is basically saying that $R_2$ approaches $0$ ``faster'' than any quadratic
care to elaborate on that?
and why does everyone say that R2 should only have x^3 and higher order terms?
wtf with that
well you can imagine that if the limit approaches 0, then at some point $R_2$ must be massively bigger than $(x-a)^2$ (hence their ratio approaches 0)
κλαουντ ☁ (cloud)
if the taylor series converges, then R_2 is just all the terms we chopped off of the taylor series (something x^3 + something x^4 + something x^5 + ...)
if the limit approaches 0, then should it be that the numerator is smaller and the denominator is getting larger . . . I dont think I follow AT ALL
oh sorry i got it backward
(x-a)^2 gets much bigger than R_2, because R_2 is getting smaller faster
yess, why is that
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????///////
well if we imagine a very simple 1D case, x^3 goes to 0 much faster than x^2 (thinking of x approaching 0) because it's multiplied by another factor of x
in this remainder, we basically have a bunch of cubic terms so they're going to act like x^3, and we're comparing it to something that acts like x^2
yes, cubic wins over quadratic all the time, so It doesnt make any sense to me how is this limit is approaching 0
you see what I mean? am I tripping hard? or WTF
in the limit as $x \to \infty$, $x^3$ gets much bigger than $x^2$
in the limit as $x \to 0$, $x^3$ gets much smaller than $x^2$
κλαουντ ☁ (cloud)
ohh right
that detailed I missed Lmfao
however, why does everyone say that R2 contains only sum of polynomials of deg 3
@sharp coral you mentioned something about "chopping off" care to elaborate?
well in the 1D taylor series you have
[ f(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + \frac{f''(a)}{2!}(x-a)^2 + \underbrace{\frac{f^{(3)}(a)}{2!}(x-a)^3 + \frac{f^{(4)}(a)}{4!}(x-a)^4 + \cdots}_{R_2(x)} ]
$R_2$ is literally all the other terms past the degree 2 terms
κλαουντ ☁ (cloud)
I see
what about the multivariable case
we dont have f^{(3)} anymore, is that like the hessian multiplied by a hessian multiplied by a hessian?
just saying, lagrange reminder in 1 variable is already hard, now in multivariable is even harder, at least for me
is good that we had a brief summary of how it is in the single variable scenario, but how does it generalize for multiple variables?
like, we now have gradients, hessians, and jacobians or what? instead of normal derivatives
since we have multiple directions now we have to work with partial derivatives and mixed partial derivatives
correct?
also this @sharp coral equality, is Theoretical
like we cant find the error with the taylor reminder precisely
is just theoretical, in practice if we would have an equality with the remainder, it would be because we used a calculator of some sort
like, this is why we usually find an upper bound for the lagrange remainder and not the actual reminder Himself
you know what I mean?
or am I tripping hard again? WTFFF
well if you remember in the 1D case you could get a conservative error estimate by finding the maximum value of the derivative on the interval you're interested in (since Q must be somewhere between x and a)
here you can do the same except it would be more annoying because you have to maximize four different derivatives
dont tell me that, the following exercises ask me to estime the error for some taylor polis (multivar)
hopefully is not too hard
you can't really find the exact error because if you knew the exact error that would be equivalent to knowing the exact value
you mean an upper bound for the error?
yes "conservative estimate" = upper bound
yet, iirc, the taylor theorem says that f(x) = P2(x) + R2(x) how does he do it?
well yes
he is not using an approximation
because R_2 is the exact error
in theory, yeah
but in practice you can't actually find the exact value of R_2, you just find an upper bound for R_2 and call it a day
yeah, I think I get it now, but he says its the exact error because his series is infinite?
or why is the exact error R2(x)?
that's just the definition of R_2
care to elaborate?
like that's what R_2 is defined to be, is the exact error
this taylor reminder, how is it defined?
the formula you posted above is a consequence of this definition which lagrange derived
the definition is just $R_2(x) = f(x) - P_2(x)$
κλαουντ ☁ (cloud)
whats the definition of P2(x) ?
there are various formulas for R_2 which include the one you posted above, an integral remainder, etc
second order taylor polynomial
yes but around what point? X and is an infinite taylor series or what?
a taylor series up to 2?
any point really, just the R_2 and the P_2 are based on the same point
you can call the point a in 1D or (a,b) in 2D if you want
and P_2 is really just the taylor series formula written out to the first three terms (constant, linear, quadratic)
I am getting lost in between the actual taylor theorem and the approximation
another thing that is driving me crazy is this D^alpha. any idea what It means? the jacobian?
the thing is, for this R2(x) to continue like that, we should know f is of class C^infty, so like a polynomial function for example
usually we just know f is of class C^k or C^(k+1)
also, from the original image, we just know F is of class C^2, so how is that the remainder is using third order partial derivatives?
isnt this a typo and should have said F is of class C^3?
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
well yes this equation is only true if f is equal to its taylor series. it doesn't have to have a full taylor series to have a degree 2 taylor polynomial
f must be twice differentiable to have a second-order taylor polynomial approximation and three times differentiable for the lagrange formula for the remainder to be true
it explains what it means immediately above
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
seems kinda abstract
yeah so I pressume in the image I sent there must be a mistake or something, because otherwise we dont know if R2 is defined no?
is claiming f is C2
but using third order partials for R2
wdym?
the definition of R_2(x) is just R_2(x) = P_2(x) - f(x). so that only requires f be C2. Any formulas for R_2 other than that may require higher differentiability
so the formula of R_2 being the sum of all the other terms of the taylor series requires infinite differentiability, and the lagrange remainder formula requires the function be 3 times differentiable
.solved
Closed by @tidal turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Are you still stuck on that question?
And secondly, is the latter fixed or not?
?
Now we assume as normal, a <= b <= c where a, b, c are amount of money in each accounts
Now since c >= b then Peter can always transfer $b from account with $c to account with $b, as in doubled
And the remaining money can just be transfered to a
@rare maple Has your question been resolved?
you need c-b to be equal to a to be able to do this
you cant always follow that strategy
We can only consider odd numbers only
I conjectured earlier that GCD a,b can be achieved for 2 accounts which turned out to be false
Might be achievable
@rare maple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello can someone go through this with me step by step im really confused
@night gyro Has your question been resolved?
$\overrightarrow{OD} = \lambda \cdot \overrightarrow{OB}$
$\overrightarrow{OD}$ looks better
lamba times ob?
(De)Carbonized
you express $\overrightarrow{OB}$ in terms of $\overrightarrow{OA}$ and $\overrightarrow{AB}$ and you got your first equation
(De)Carbonized
ok how
also is this right
that's wrong
because the problem states the ratio $\frac{OD}{OB}$ = $\lambda$ and not $\frac{OD}{DB}$
(De)Carbonized
the problem wants us to express OD in 2 different ways with a, b, mu and lambda
yh
here's the first thing you get
but it lready states OD is lmbda
$\overrightarrow{OD} = \lambda \overrightarrow {OB} = \lambda (\overrightarrow {OA} + \overrightarrow {AB})$
(De)Carbonized
thats to find OB
then you substitute OA and AB in
why did it chnage it looked right before
got your first equation
wait
i dont get this part could u explain it
which is a+2b+2a-0.5b= 3a+1.5b
$\frac {OD}{OB} = \frac{\lambda}{1}$
$\rightarrow OD = \lambda \cdot OB$
$\rightarrow \overrightarrow{OD} = \lambda \overrightarrow{OB}$ (since those two vectors points to the same direction)
(De)Carbonized
i got the first equation here
you forgot to multiply lambda
yes
there's a lambda at the front here
it's a bit tricky
we just got our first expression for OD here
lemme type out the second one
$$\overrightarrow{OD}$$
$$= \overrightarrow{OA} + \overrightarrow{AD}$$
$$= \overrightarrow{OA} + \mu \overrightarrow{AC}$$
$$= \overrightarrow{OA} + \mu (\overrightarrow{OC} - \overrightarrow{OA})$$
(De)Carbonized
our second 1?
yea
but mew AC does not go to D it foes all the way upto AC
well vectors OA + AC = OC right?
yep
we are trying to get the second equation for OD
This is our first equation we've established before
yh
wht we do now
why we findin 4 equation my teacher just did OB and AB find 2 equations and solve
you replace OA = a + 2b and AC = -2b + 2a into this equation
what is the questiion even asking we already found OD
reread the problem again
we have to express OD in two different ways
AC= OC-OA?
yes
3a-a+b?
3a - (a+2b) you mean?
yes
wouldnt it jst give this
to get (1 + 2mu)a + (2 - 2mu)b
you'll see why we group it like this later on
and that's our second expression for OD
yes
now we have:
(3 lambda)a + (1.5 lambda)b = (1 + 2mu)a + (2 - 2mu)b
we're asked to find mu and lambda to satisfy this equation
what do you get from this
idk
remember that a and b are not algebraic numbers, they're vectors
exactly
yes
why is it 1.5k at the top and 3h at the bottom
Closed by @night gyro
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when doing dot product (for example: (ai+bj).(ci+dj)), is it = (ai)(ci) + (ai)(dj) + (bj)(ci) + (bj)(dj) = ac + 0 + 0 + bd = ac + bd due to i.i and j.j = 1 and i.j and j.i = 0 from the cos theta = a.b/|a||b|
yes
Closed by @ionic thicket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Determine if $(M+N)^0= M^0 \cap N^0$ is true when $M,N$ are not both finite dim
wai
what does ^0 mean, annihilator?
yea i think so, what's your reasoning?
One min
Let $f \in (M+N)^0$ then $f(v) \forall v \in M+ N$. $v \in M \implies v \in M+ N$. so $f(M)=0$ similaarly for F(N)
wai
yes, so that implies $(M + N)^0 \subseteq M^0 \cap N^0$, how about the converse
Bungo
follows from linarity of the functional
yea that one also seems easy if i'm doing it right in my head
if f kills M and g kills N, then f+g kills anything that's in both M and N
and conversely, if f kills M + N then in particular it kills M, so f = f + 0 is in M^0 + N^0
yup
I think follows simialrly for (M+N) perp
you mean if we assume we're in an inner product space?
yup
yea i would think so offhand, orthogonal complements act a lot like annihilators
I think by reisz they are the same ( practically)
yea in finite dimensions, i haven't had enough coffee to think about infinite dimensions haha
of course annihilators are more general since they exist even if there's no inner product
I just hope I'm not asked to prove |V^*>|V| in my exam 🙏 [ in inf dim]
oh yea the dual and double dual stuff gets fun in infinite dimensions
yea , it does
do you have an exam soon?
this sat
ah best of luck then!
It's quite extensive
tq
final exam?
ah yes, makes sense
like we'll start studying operators after midsem [ on fin dim spaces extensively and inf dim wherever possible]
i have probably asked before but i don't recall, is this a second course in LA or an honors course or smth?
Operator theory
oh nice
but with no analysis so really a ton of LA
Another question
If $y,z \in V^*$ , and $[x,y]=0 $ whenever $[x,z]=0$ . Then $\exists a: y=az$
is the whenevr here a iff
nvm
wait, x is in V?
it's <-
do you mean y = az at the end then?
ah ok
wai
oops bad wording
This tells us ker(z) \subseteq ker(y)
Well, it has to be iff.y=az would mean they both have the same kernel
yea why would that imply y = az for some a
which isn't necessarily true
right (unless a = 0)
so that's it?
what's the problem statement, prove or give a counterexample?
prove
but we just established it's not true, no?
unless you assume they really meant "iff" instead of "whenever"
hmm lemme take a peek at halmos, what section/page is this?
ah i think it works without assuming iff
these are linear functionals, so their kernels must have dimension n-1 or n
rank-nullity theorem strikes again
should be just n - 1 then?
from the context i'm assuming that V is finite dimensional here (since that is after all the title of halmos's book)
I'm assuming infinite here
Should have mentioned
well we have ker(z) contained in ker(y)
so nullity(z) <= nullity(y)
if nullity(y) is n, then y is the zero functional, so we can take a = 0
otherwise we have the nullities equal, so the kernels are equal
hmm, might actually need "iff" for the infinite case, lemme see if i can think of an example
@twilit field Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i expand this?
i get something like this
but idk how to proceed
not very familiar with distributing derivative operators
@ionic thicket Has your question been resolved?
is this from physics
nope
is this backwards notation
what is that
nvm i think i get the notation
I think this is off what you got
How are r and θ defined?
You should first treat this as a dot product
Derivative operators act from the right so dr dr -> dr^2
yea that too, you can derive that also easily
ohh thanks its just some really really annoying algebra but in the end i got it
also really useful to know rhat.rhat and thetahat.thetahat = 1
and rhat.thetahat = 0
yep definitely need those
(i.e. rhat, thetahat are orthonormal)
the thing that makes them tricky is that they both depend on theta
what theorem/identity states that dxdy = |det J| ds dt, where J is the jacobian matrix?
yeah
afaik it's just called the (multivariable) change of variables theorem
hxx
thxx
@ionic thicket Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,, \sin(x) \leq \frac{1}{2}
how to solve
,, x = \frac{\pi}{6} + 2k \pi
so the solution should be an interval
i draw some lines in the circle , but idk how to group the solution into one line
This notation is a bit unusual
dont mind lol
, k \in \mathbb{Z}
Yes, but theres another value of x, then you need to figure out, then think about where sinx will be less
it should be all the way down from pi/6 to 5pi/6
<@&268886789983436800>
@rancid vigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can the first derivative test be used to find a change in sign and therefore whether a point is a POI or POU
the criterion for a point to be an inflection point is whether the second derivative changes signs
you can't see that just by looking at the first derivative
point of undulation
so for this question would i find the domain
and stationary points
@leaden seal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I do this 💀
Please no really confusing terms
sorry i didnt know u replied
I forgot to say to pign me
but
i think it means inverse
Ye so just find the inverses and see what satisfies both conditions
also for this wuestion answer is a) right
Yeah I don’t see what’s wrong with A
ure saying its a right
yes
.close
Closed by @native wharf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ive only spoiled myself this far, how did they get -1 is in the range of f?
ok... i may have misread the subtitution as (1000,1000)
.solved
Closed by @viral dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the context in the question: we have defined the function as a relation of the Cartesian product of two sets, and two sets are equal when they are the subset of each other
though its pretty clear to me that if two sets are equal, then the first element of the ordered pairs are all equal, and as all elements of a set is captured by the first element of the the odered pairs then the domain(f) = domain(g), but can someone help me write this clearly and formally?
@rich leaf Has your question been resolved?
two sets A and B are equal if there is a bijection f between A and B; if you define a functions as sets (i would have to see exactly how your text does this), then two functions f and g would be equal if there is an invertible map between them; you would then be able to show that dom f = dom g , and f(x) = g(x) forall x implies f=g
they define it like this
Well start writing out what you have
We can help you make stuff more precise, but the overall answer should still be yours
@rich leaf Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rich leaf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this channel closed?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Well we know he bought it for 30/kg
And sold it at a profit of 66.67%
So what's his actual selling price
@near geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need some help with exercise 9
Describe the values of gcd(7a+8, 7a + 3) as a function of the values of a in Z
@tidal turret Has your question been resolved?
What?
Which language?
5a not 7a
Describe the values of gcd(5a+8, 7a + 3) as a function of the values of a in Z
Language name?
Europe?
a belongs to z
Put a=0
Gcd(8,3)=1
a=1--(13,10)=1
a=2---(
18,17=1
use gcd(n, m) = gcd(n, m-n)
-2a+5 if we do n-m
spanish
yea
gcd(5a+8,2a-5) = gcd(a +18, 2a -5)
= gcd(a+18,-41)
yea and 41 is prime
that considerably narrows down the possibilities for the gcd, yes?
either 41 | a + 18
so the gcd will be 1 unless (a+18) is multiple of 41 yea
right
took me a bit to think it through
so either a + 18 is coprime with 41
or 41 | a + 18
you here?
yup, for any given prime p and other integer x they are either coprime or x = kp
now what? what should i do now
HELP
nothing, that's the function
it's 1 for all integers except multiplies of 41
where it's 41
what now?
so for a+18 = k*41 you have 41
a = k*41 - 18 => f(a) = 41
and f(a) = 1 for other integers
what?
okay, the question asks you to provide the value of gcd as a function of a, right?
yes
so the answer you need is some function f: Z -> Z
that takes an integer, plugs it into a and returns the value of gcd(5a+8, 7a+3)
is just that if the input of this function is divisible by 41
not the input, the input + 18
then A is of the form a = -18 + 41k
what
ahh the function is tje GCD
i see
yes
yup
so if 41 | a + 18 then GCD = 41
yes
otherwise GCD = 1
yup
simple as dat
ok, so a quick recap of the procedure done @supple pilot @nova yoke
how would it be?
- do X
- do Y
- do Z
- cleanup and celebration
math in a nutshell
- take the gcd(5a+8, 7a+3)
- subtract one of the expressions from the other until a is only in one of the expressions
- look at the expression that doesn't contain a anymore (so it's a number, in this case -41)
- determine the divisors of that number (let's call it x), if it's prime then gcd = x when the other expression is a multiple of x, 1 otherwise
if it's not prime then it's a bit more complicated
the 2. point is basically what is called the euclid's algorithm
i just like doing it so it sticks the algorithms easier is a learning hack
wdym?
in this case 41 is prime
we were lucky, you are saying?
if we had something like 4 instead of 41 then we would have to consider multiples of 2 too
so we would have gcd = 4 for multiples of 4, gcd = 2 for multiples of 2 that are not multiples of 4, 1 otherwise
what if we have a gazillion divisors, like 400
we just use prime factorization and consider those
then it starts to become faster to write a computer program that writes the answer for you
then we would have to consider them all
but also considering that divisors can divide other divisors so it becomes a mess
what about finding lots of solutions for x^n + y^n = z^n for n > 2 can computer find those?
ah damn it, i see
yea try writing that and get back to me when it finishes haha
yes it's quite easy, but the program won't fit on the page so it's left as an exercise for the reader
i'll get you started, x = y = z = 0
.solved
Closed by @tidal turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
have a calc 1 exam tmrw and related rates is on it. this is from prac exam but also how would i solve this but also go abt solving other related rates problems
sketch and label variables, write one equation linking them (geometry/volumes), take d(...)/dt on both sides plug the snapshot numbers, solve for the unknown rate, and report sign + units
for this case im thinking pyth theorm. so a^2 + b sqr = c srq. so then im thinking 34 sqr plus 3 sqr = unkown. but lets say we find that answer we differentiate that or ewhat
use variables first then differentiate
can u show how
sure
let x(t) = boat–dock distance
s(t) = rope length
geometry gives s^2 = x^2 + 3^2 (the 3 ft is constant)
differentiate both sides 2s * ds/dt = 2x * dx/dt so dx/dt = (s/x) * ds/dt
at x = 24 s = sqrt(24^2 + 3^2) = sqrt(585)
given ds/dt = -3 ft/s then dx/dt = (sqrt(585)/24) * (-3) = -sqrt(585)/8 which is abt -3.02 ft/s
so the negative means the boat is moving toward the dock at 3.02 ft/s
np
.close
Closed by @indigo fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
still dont get
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @dusty oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If determinant of augmented matrix is 2021, then the system of linear equations is regular.
Determinant of augmented matrix ? How does it exist
I don't yet know
Oh!
"if the determinant of a system of linear equations is 2021, then it is regular"
Si le déterminant d'un système d'équations linéaires est égal à 2021, alors ce système est régulier. maybe in francaise
Le déterminant fonctionne que sur des matrices carrées et la matrice augmentée n'est pas souvent carrée
Si tu as AX = B avec detA != 0 alors oui il y a des solutions, même une unique solution. Parcontre si A n'est pas carrée et donc que le det n'est pas définie, ça ne veut PAS DIRE qu'il n'y a pas de solution, il y en a soit une infinité, soit aucune
∀ sys règulier ∃! solution
Si système régulier signifie det != 0 alors oui
système linéaire régulier = matrice carrée avec det ≠ 0
Par contre, le screenshot que tu as posté ne porte pas sur ça
Je suis très reconnaissant·e pour votre aide.
@shut canyon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @shut canyon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
First isomorphism theorem!
Without that :(
As far as I can recall we haven't done this in class
( first iso theorm)
what is V‘
Dual
dual of $V$
wai
Anyway, try to get a linear map
V' --> M' with kernel M0
This same maps gives an isomorphism
Just instead of
f --> g
f + M0 --> g
Let ${f_i + M^0 \mid i \in \Omega}$ be a basis of $V'/M^0$. let ${f_i \mid i \in \Lambda}$ be basis of $M'$
wait what
wai
F, no wonder I didnt get this in my assignment
So what exactly is M0 btw
annhilator
I don't get this
Can you give such a map?
Yeah
If you get this map you can use the induced map
$M \subseteq V \implies M' \subseteq V'$. So $|V'|≥|M'|$. Further $M^0 \subseteq M'$. So $|V'|≥|M'|≥|M^0|$
forget cardinalities
wai
M' is also not a subset or V'
M‘ is not a subset of V‘ too
but M is a subset of V
Dual are functionals on whole space
what are the elements of V' ?
And the whole space is different
and what does that mean?
these functionals aren't defined on V\M
yes
Define $T(f)= \begin{cases} 0 & f \in M^0 \ f \vert_{M} & \text{ otherwise } \end{cases}$\
wai
why piecewise
Your first case is the same in The second
what is f|M if f is in M0
so just $T(f)= f \vert_{M}$
wai
0
ngl in hindsight this shouldn't have taken me so long to come up with
So what can you say about the induced map
Injective?
U just showed its injective
Well
oops
Not showed
one-one
But u constructed it so its injective
Its not injective
then how is it an isomorphism
The induced map is
Right induced map
what
I'm so confused
so I've constructed a map that takes any element in V' to M', fine. with kernel M^0
now what
This isn't injective is it
No
do you know what the induced map is tho
no
Well the induced map is now a map V‘/M0->M‘
Show that the kernel is 0
yeah M0 is 0 in the quotient
Just wanted to know, is this supposed to be easy?
The solution we got to is pretty simple
in infinite dim, I'd replace dim with cardinality, right
yea true, I should have been able to come up with this myself 😭
What is Ran
range
Oh
Don’t think it is
then what would dim become
idk if there’s a replacement
yea, same
Let $T: \mathcal{P}(\R) \to \mathcal{P}(\R)$ be the differentiation map . $Ran(T) = \mathcal{P}(\R); Ker(T) = k; k\in \R$
wai
@twilit field Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
<@&268886789983436800>
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @violet pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

thua
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i was doing percentile and i need to find P10 but it came out at 0.6th item and now idk what to do
that doesn't look right
should be 5 - 1 = 4 instead
considering 100/4 = 25:
8 is the 0th percentile
30 is the 25th percentile
32 is the 50th percentile = median
67 is the 75th percentile
72 is the 100th percentile
Math
@sharp dust Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I have two sets
A=m, B=2 then how many number of into functions?
2^m would be total number of functions
what is an into function?
subtract the number of onto functions from the total
is that surjective or injective?
that should be easier i think
Injective
btw here the answer would be just 2 as there are only two possible values the function could take

assuming B is the range set ofc
@near geyser Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @near geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me make sense of this? thxx
basically it has simplified u.dS to u.n(dS)
where n is the direcn of the area vector
and dS is the magnitude
@ionic thicket Has your question been resolved?
hmmm
lemme thnk
you can maybe see it as calculating the electric/magnetic flux for the surface
since we only want the field lines escaping the surface we use a dot product to remove any parralel ones
so in summary you can say the dot product is used to find or isolate the vector lines escaping the surface
The dot product is to only take the part of u that aligns to the normal vector of the surface
aka perpendicular to the surface
as only that part of u matters for the surface integral

ye that is better....
@ionic thicket Has your question been resolved?
how is this done? i am not very very familiar with how dot product works
i only know the basics of it
A feature of the dot product is that if one of the vectors is a unit vector it turns into a projection operator
that means
if i multiply a vector by the unit vector in the x direction
i am projecting that vector onto the x direction
taking the x component so to speak
in this case instead of the x direction you take the direction perpendicular to the surface
meaning you project u to the normal vector
taking only the parts of u that are along the normal vector
to do it in detail requires details of the normal vector n and also the vector field u
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
alright so.. say that I have 13 people on a room handshaking eacch other, without repeat the handshake, how many handshakes will occur, how do I do that?
if this is a homework question, can you send a picture?
(of the homework problem)
there is no picture
I just translated it
do you mean like
you want to see it
untranslated?
this is better than nothing
[hint 1: can you count the number of ordered pairs of people?]
erm... okay guess i have to explain what "ordered pairs" are
okay simpler hint
[hint 0: try it for a smaller number of people, and count by hand]
I did tho
what did you get
I though like
12+11+10+9+...
I did it on a whiteboard and counted the nodes
not right tho
what did you get
90?
strange, 78 seems right
oh
no wait
it's one of the options
still, I solved that with sigma notation
I was supposed to solve it
with combinatorics
so I though I did something wrong
have you heard of binomial coefficients
You still did solve it with combinatorics. Just in a different way than the “simplest” way
maybe the name is diferent, is it something like, (x+3)(x+2)(x+1) and the coefficient is -3, -2, -1 (that also reminds me of roots, but is it something like that?)
No mean
Í know that's the roots
when you talk with coefficients
that's closer to stirling numbers of the first kind iirc
but what you want to consider are the coefficients of $(1+x)^n$
Element118
yeah no it's not here
maybe I learned it last year and forgot about it
plus, what does "iirc" mean
ok yea sorry, makes sense now, 13 people, subgroups of 2, how many subgroups can you make
let me see if that matches
yeah, that's it, I swear if it wasn't for the tip on that I wouldn't figure that out
.close
Closed by @sour hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I am stuck on the assembly drawing
As you can see I've drawn the 3d projections for each part but I am unsure as to what it means by 2 view assembly drawing
@leaden seal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
No, it isnt
Try to explain your logic about these tho
Closed by @crude zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-49 message
hi
<@&268886789983436800>
<@&286206848099549185>
hi is anyone here?
please
been waiting for around 40 mins
.close
Closed by @crude zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
More scams here as well
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me w questions 1 and 2
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
.solved #help-35 message
Closed by @pearl hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yall know about quadratic equations like finding roots and vertex??
i need help to understand the steps
please show an example of a question you're stuck with.
Ok what do you need help with?
Finding roots of quadratic:
$$x = \frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}$$
Sometimes, the roots of the quadratic will be complex.
or, (sometimes not possible) factor directly from quadratic.
Vertex:
$$x = -\frac{b}{2a}$$
Sub. this in to find the y-coordinate.
lets say: f(x)= 10x^2-11x-6
find root and vertex
are you allowed to use the quadratic formula?
yess
then toss it straight in there.
yeah but wht abt the ones with factoring?
What method did your teacher teach you?
factoring and plugging into the formula
I don’t think that’s a factoring method lol
what formula? after factoring you no longer need the quadratic formula, no?
she means two methods probably
Ohhh
oh, factoring, and formula.
no you dont. i meant the other method
yeah
Wait I’m confused :/
mb guys
in complicated cases like this, you can try to factor by splitting the middle term.
maybe you have heard of this being referred to as the "ac method", but I personally call it splitting the middle term.
both methods of solving are acceptable.
if your calculator has an automatic quadratic solving function, use it: if the roots are fractions are integers, then you can solve by factoring
otherwise, just use quadratic formula
alr lemme find a good example
we call it the criss-cross method in my country lmao
this example actually has rational roots, so it's actually not too bad of an example to see the middle term split method.
wdym by if roots are fractions are integers??
if your calculator cant automatically solve quadratics, dont need to worry about that
- 10*6
- factor :x^2-11x-60 right?
first two steps
alr my teacher doesnt allow us to use graphing calculators so i dont think it will automatically solve
that's a new idea I have not seen before. my way involves finding two numbers that multiply to ac and add to b.
you don't need a graphing calculator to solve quadratics.
you can use it to check if the roots are rational. if so, try the factorisation method. otherwise, it is a surefire sign for you to use the quadratic formula
plugging in is a different case
like your teacher disallows it but it's not like he or she is gonna somehow telepathically know you used it to determine which method is easier to use
all the teacher sees is the working step
i mean im good with the ones where we just plug in
problem is where you gotta find by factoring method i cant simplify it with the calculator we use
and also where this "i" stuff comes in
when theres a negative square root
if the roots are complex, abandon factoring entirely.
okay okay first of all does your calculator have a function that takes in a, b, and c of the quadratic and output its roots?
in fact, perhaps do a quick check with the discriminant before even trying to factor. if it's negative, just don't bother factoring at this level and throw it into the quadratic formula.
this is also a good tip
to add, if it's irrational, just use quadratic formula
no it cant solve for roots.. i can use it as a help with calculating stuff
and that. the way you'd know there would be trouble is to see if the discriminant is a perfect square.
if it is not, again just throw away factoring.
well honestly
given everything
i think your best bet is to always stick to quadratic formula in exams
unless the factor is like really really obvious
calculating the discriminant is already like 3/4-th of the way to solving by quadratic formula
so like i can use the formula for any type? cuz our teacher was like use factoring in these problems and use the formula for the others..
it applies to any quadratic, yes
do you have an example problem?
also, for the other part to your problem on finding the vertex, you can either use x = average of the roots you got in part 1, or use x = -b/2a. Then substitute this value of x into the original equation to find the y-coordinate.
finding AOS?
finding the vertex of the quadratic equation
yeah like we use tht formula to find axis of symmetry and then use it for vertex
its the same way
yeah
no need. I did nothing.
you did help me understand! thanks
@sonic mesa Has your question been resolved?