#help-49

1 messages · Page 212 of 1

languid mica
#

Like

blissful pier
#

(\sum _n 5a(n)=5\sum_n a(n))

grand pondBOT
#

PajamaMamaLlama

humble torrent
#

Well write out the sum and see

languid mica
#

Sum of xn + x^n

blissful pier
#

like that?

languid mica
fallow scarab
languid mica
#

(\sum _n a(n) + b(n) =\sum_n a(n) + \sum_n b(n))

#

Like this ?

#

(\sum _n a(n) + b(n) =\sum_n a(n) + \sum_n b(n))

#

Fire

blissful pier
#

that is also a property of finite summation, yes but read more from Riemann's links

languid mica
#

No like

blissful pier
#

\(a\)

grand pondBOT
#

PajamaMamaLlama

languid mica
#

Is sum a(n) + b(n(

#

Aplying sum on b(n) aswell

#

Or i need to put parenthesis to show i wanna include b(n)

languid mica
#

Thats basically what im asking

languid mica
#

Read the question

languid mica
#

I dont wanna know identities

blissful pier
#

for that I usually include parentheses

languid mica
#

I wanna know what the notation means

blissful pier
#

to clear up any ambiguity

languid mica
#

Like example

#

For sin operator

#

We use sin(something)

#

And sin is applied to everything in parenthesis

blissful pier
#

you're asking about:
(\sum_n(a(n)+b(n))) vs. (\sum_n a(n)+b(n))?

grand pondBOT
#

PajamaMamaLlama

fallow scarab
languid mica
#

No bro

#

Like sin(something)

blissful pier
languid mica
#

What sin is applied on ends on the )

#

On sum where does it end?

fallow scarab
#

and below the identities

languid mica
#

Are they the same?

autumn canopy
#

Yes they are the same

blissful pier
#

it would depend on context

#

but most of the time yes

languid mica
#

Oh ok

#

So sum is just applied to anything thats on the right of the Σ

autumn canopy
#

If n is coming from the sum and you don't have it anywhere else, it's pretty clear

blissful pier
#

but if you're writing it, I prefer to use the former to clear up any ambiguity

languid mica
#

Like here are outside parenthesis needed to show that C isnt included in sum?

#

Or not

#

I put cause i thought sum doesn't end its just whatever is on the right of Σ

autumn canopy
#

But it's still better like this

languid mica
#

Ok thanks

autumn canopy
#

Some people might write stuff like $\dst \sum_{k = 1}^\infty \arctan\l(\frac{1}{k^2}\r) + 5$ though, without worrying about this

grand pondBOT
languid mica
#

In this expression

autumn canopy
#

(This would be written badly but from context it should become clear)

languid mica
#

Is 5 included to the sum

#

Or no

blissful pier
#

exactly the ambiguity good parentheses resolves

autumn canopy
languid mica
#

Oh ok

autumn canopy
#

You look at the line above this

languid mica
#

Yea got it thanks

#

Another thing

steel crest
languid mica
#

been hearing about Γ and ζ function what are those in ? Like course

#

Idk if i should have learnt them already or they are later on

autumn canopy
blissful pier
steel crest
#

and other places

blissful pier
autumn canopy
#

Gamma(x) is the generalization of the factorial

#

zeta usually the Riemann zeta function

blissful pier
#

(\Gamma (n)=\int_0^\infty t^{n-1}e^{-t}dt=(n-1)!) and (\zeta(s)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^s})

grand pondBOT
#

PajamaMamaLlama

blissful pier
#

(might've messed up the integral blobsweats but those are the defintiions)

languid mica
#

Im solving challenging for me problems so i learn everything to the fullest

#

And ill then move on to a new

#

Idk which prob complex analysis

blissful pier
#

I might suggest LinAlg

#

and if you're big into theory then Axler

#

my university used Lay's Linear Algebra

languid mica
#

Idk what level i have completed

#

But i did most matrix stuff and transformations etc

blissful pier
#

subspaces, vector spans, orthgonality, etc too?

languid mica
#

Are those linear algebra 1 or 2?

#

I probably only did 1

blissful pier
#

I haven't seen linear algebra split into multiple classes?

languid mica
#

Oh

blissful pier
#

so I am unfamiliar with the terms and wouldn't be able to comment

autumn canopy
#

For me it was split up into two (Germany)

#

Those would be middle-late la1

shadow schooner
#

split in two for me too

languid mica
#

In Aristotelian university here in Greeceit is

#

I mean those i think are same semester with complex analysis

#

For this university

autumn canopy
#

la2 is multilinear algebra (properly defining the determinant, dual spaces, tensor stuff)

languid mica
#

Like la1 is second semester

#

La2 is 6th-7th

autumn canopy
#

huh

languid mica
#

Same with conplex analysis

blissful pier
autumn canopy
#

diagonlization as a special case was la1

languid mica
autumn canopy
languid mica
#

You know any website first saying definitions and then theorems then afterwards giving problems to solve

languid mica
autumn canopy
#

Are you a math major?

blissful pier
languid mica
languid mica
#

Had most def/theorems

blissful pier
#

Here's Lay's Linear Algebra

autumn canopy
languid mica
#

Oh ok

autumn canopy
#

Though it's pretty big

languid mica
autumn canopy
#

Like 400 or so pages

languid mica
#

I thought la was small course

#

Like la1

autumn canopy
#

la1 is one semester, same as la2

#

My lecture notes were ~100 pages respectively

languid mica
autumn canopy
#

So a total of around 200 pages

languid mica
#

Damn

#

I only did a lot of transformations and matrix stuff equations etc

autumn canopy
#

Yeah that's good, sounds like the beginning of la1

languid mica
#

Yea i thought the rest is much more advanced since wasnt in the book i was using

#

So i just thought id wait for later on

autumn canopy
#

I heard for engineering students etc. they have a computational version

languid mica
#

But till them

#

I just wanna do pure maths

#

For fun

autumn canopy
#

cool!

languid mica
#

Im probably gonna keep doing math till i finish all courses in math uni even if its after engineering

autumn canopy
#

You might complement this with Axler's book

#

I think Strang doesn't do any dual spaces or tensors for example

languid mica
#

Like will i learn all of la1 if i follow all those vids

autumn canopy
languid mica
#

Ok

#

Ill follow this course

#

But when i get home im away rn and its not good on phone prob

autumn canopy
languid mica
#

Rn i just do random stuff

shadow schooner
languid mica
#

Im doing int a/x^n +b dx rn

autumn canopy
#

Yeah functional analysis is basically just linear algebra and then trying to apply a bunch of analysis to it

languid mica
#

Where n=2k kEN

languid mica
#

Link

#

So i remember

#

.close

#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @languid mica

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

analog carbon
midnight plankBOT
analog carbon
#

i know its not hard i js forgot how to do this

modern sapphire
#

there is only a handful of circles related theorem in school maths. Which one do you think fits this situation?

#

You have two chords intersecting, and you know the lengths of three parts

modern sapphire
#

pandahmm if you want me to validate your guess, then it would be better if you specify what ab, bc etc. are

analog carbon
#

soooo a is 2 and b is x and c is 3 and d is 4

modern sapphire
#

umm, that seems so wrong

analog carbon
#

idk bro

analog carbon
#

\😭

analog carbon
#

a^2 = dc

modern sapphire
#

Do you know a theorem called power of a point?

analog carbon
#

no

modern sapphire
#

oh okay, how about similar triangle?

#

do you know triangle similarity?

analog carbon
#

all angles of a triangle add up to 180

#

degrees

modern sapphire
#

umm, thats true for all triangles. Similarity is like when two triangles are same shape but different sizes, like one is a zoomed out/scaled version of the other

analog carbon
#

oh like kinda like tranformations

modern sapphire
#

you seem all over the place

#

can you tell me what grade this is?

analog carbon
#

geometry

#

circles

modern sapphire
#

well duh

analog carbon
#

i think its geometry hnrs

modern sapphire
#

let me redraw the diagram

analog carbon
#

alr

modern sapphire
#

if you remove the third chord that has z, the remaining figure would look something like this

analog carbon
#

ohh so x=z

modern sapphire
#

no

#

i didnt say that

analog carbon
#

u dilated the circle

modern sapphire
#

i did no such thing

#

i am only ignoring the third chord for the time being since it has no use in finding x

analog carbon
#

ohh ok

#

then how'd u get 6

modern sapphire
#

the length 6 comes from the fact that 6 = 4+2

analog carbon
#

ye

#

ok

#

i understnad

modern sapphire
#

these two combined are 6 units long

analog carbon
#

ye

modern sapphire
#

so uhh, yea

#

if you join these points

analog carbon
#

then do i do b(a+b) = d(c+d)

modern sapphire
analog carbon
#

ohh

#

ae times ed = be time ec

modern sapphire
#

can you tell me what the a,b,c,d you say are?

modern sapphire
modern sapphire
analog carbon
#

ty broo

#

saved my life

modern sapphire
#

thats the power of a point theorem

analog carbon
#

eliminate

#

and simplify

#

i got it

#

many thanks

modern sapphire
modern sapphire
analog carbon
#

DUDE

#

i dont knoiwww

modern sapphire
#

like how did you know this is a thing?

#

what made you say ae times ed = be time ec

analog carbon
#

i did these problems before so i remember

#

the equations

#

im js very washed

modern sapphire
#

oh ok

analog carbon
#

alr so x=4

#

ty

modern sapphire
#

yea

analog carbon
#

have a nice night or day

#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @analog carbon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

modern sapphire
midnight plankBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

molten bay
midnight plankBOT
molten bay
#

All options are wrong

rose trout
#

How come?

modern sapphire
#

well, the last option looks closest to the answer catshrug

hoary pulsar
#

Remember you can't just take the sqrt of 625 and 0.0025 to get the answer

#

Since they're combined into 1 number they'll interfere with one another

molten bay
#

I don't think it is good

#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @molten bay

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

hushed mauve
# molten bay

sorry to poke on a closed channel but the last one is the answer

molten bay
#

,w √625.0025

hushed mauve
#

ah

#

well i'm guessing they want it rounded

#

but aight

molten bay
hushed mauve
#

you probably should have went one or two digits further

midnight plankBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

neat silo
#

Two congruent rectangles ABCD and CEFO are placed inside a circle with center O and radius 5. Find the CG/GO.

neat silo
#

Is BCF = 90 degrees?

lyric charm
#

"BCF = 90°" and "B, C, F collinear" contradict each other

neat silo
#

why

lyric charm
#

if three points are collinear they form a 180° angle not 90°...

neat silo
#

oh mb its ABF = 90 degree and B-C-F collinear

lyric charm
#

anyway triangle ABF is right and angle ABC is also right so yes BCF are collinear

neat silo
#

alr mb for the typo

#

ty

#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @neat silo

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

molten bay
midnight plankBOT
molten bay
#

Option C can not be possible because they are asking of P(2)

#

And B,A are not linearly independence

sudden yacht
#

Exactly

#

So D is the correct answer

molten bay
#

If it was 4t^2 then option A could be correct too?

#

@sudden yacht

sudden yacht
#

Yes

#

Instead of 4y² you mean, right?

molten bay
#

Yeah

sudden yacht
#

Yep

molten bay
#

Thanks Alberto Z.

#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @molten bay

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

midnight plankBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lapis pawn
#

I feel pretty stupid asking for help for this ( lack of sleep ) but I completely forgot how to find the perimeter

lyric charm
#
  1. is this all that they give you
  2. are you currently in a test
mystic condor
lyric charm
#
  1. the perimeter of any shape is the sum of all of its side lengths
#

as oakley just said

lapis pawn
lyric charm
#

i think saying "completely forgot" is an unjustified exaggeration.

mystic condor
#

Treat that segment like a triangle

pine thicket
#

i think its safe to assume that all angles except the two on the left are right angles

lyric charm
#

is it really safe

#

maybe it's given outright and we don't even need to assume

pine thicket
#

oh true

#

but i figured you would need to otherwise the problem isnt solvable

buoyant linden
#

cuck question for not being explicit

lapis pawn
pine thicket
#

do you have any ideas to start?

lapis pawn
#

Nope

#

I haven’t been given anything to work with so I’m stuck

lyric charm
#

is there anything in the question except the diagram

#

at all

frozen finch
#

a^2=(8-3-2)^2 + (6-2)^2

lyric charm
midnight plankBOT
# frozen finch a^2=(8-3-2)^2 + (6-2)^2

As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.

lyric charm
#

and also we dont know that the right-looking angles really are right

frozen finch
#

my bad.

frozen finch
#

well in that case

#

this has too many variables

lapis pawn
#

But you would have to presume it is one

#

To solve the question

lyric charm
#

i think the current verdict is that this question is underspecified and cannot be solved yes

frozen finch
lyric charm
#

you should tell your teacher

#

that this question is missing info

frozen finch
lyric charm
#

thats what i am saying.

frozen finch
#

and your teacher

#

if they didnt say "this is 90 degrees"

#

you have no answer to tell your teacher.

lapis pawn
#

Ok thx for the help

frozen finch
#

but yeah man, your teacher gave you no info, and thats a teacher mistake.

midnight plankBOT
#

@lapis pawn Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @lapis pawn

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

midnight plankBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

twilit field
#

Let $G$ be an open subset of $\R$, then $G$ is the union of a collection of open interval such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item The pairwise intersection is empty
\item The collection is countable
\end{enumerate}

grand pondBOT
twilit field
#

I need help with part (1), rather writing a proper proof

flat spire
#

wai

twilit field
#

Let $x \in G$ be fixed , define $\Gamma = { V_{\varepsilon}(x) \mid V_{\varepsilon}(x) \subseteq G}$. Define $A = \bigcup {V{\varepsilon}(x) \in \Gamma}V_{\varepsilon}(x)$. Now consider $y \in G \land y \notin A$. We define $B$ similarly, if $A \subseteq B$, for some epsilon neighbourhood of $y$, we redefine $A$ to be the largest $\varepsilon-$neigbourhood containing both sests

grand pondBOT
twilit field
#

is this idea right y/n please

runic hamlet
#

idea yes, execution not yet

twilit field
#

tq

twilit field
runic hamlet
#

among other things, sure

oak nymph
#

What can you say about two open intervals in R that intersect

twilit field
oak nymph
#

A statement about their union would be nicer

#

Other than it being open as well, we which know

twilit field
#

Their union is open, or something else?

oak nymph
#

Their union is another open interval

#

And do you know that every open set in R is a union of open intervals?

twilit field
#

yes, prove that a while ago

oak nymph
#

Well then a proof should strike you immediately

#

These facts are enough

twilit field
#

Hmm, but I'm trying to prove we can construct a disjoint union

oak nymph
#

Ofcourse, that is what they want us to prove

twilit field
#

I'd first like to proceed with my original idea if that's fine

oak nymph
#

Sure

runic hamlet
#

you literally need that fact already to talk about the set A

twilit field
#

Let $x \in G$ be fixed , define $\Gamma = { V_{\varepsilon}(x) \mid V_{\varepsilon}(x) \subseteq G}$. Define $A = \bigcup {V{\varepsilon}(x) \in \Gamma}V_{\varepsilon}(x)$. Now consider $y \in G \land y \notin A$. If there exists $\epsilon'$ such that $A \subseteq V_{\varepsilon'}(y)$, which is also an interval as the union of two open sets whose intesection is non-empty is an interval. Then redefine $A \text {to be } A \cup V_{\varepsilon'}(y)$ , else we define $B$ simialrly to the way we define $A$, but using $y$ in place of $x$.

runic hamlet
#

the fact that the union of the intervals is again an interval

#

otherwise the set A would be useless to you

grand pondBOT
midnight plankBOT
#

@twilit field Has your question been resolved?

twilit field
#

<@&286206848099549185>

oak nymph
#

@twilit field

twilit field
runic hamlet
#

you do know that you have to satisfy both conditions at the same time, yes?

runic hamlet
#

yes

twilit field
#

lemme think about that

oak nymph
#

Well i dont specifically know how to get from this to a solution, but id like to suggest start off by giving a proof sketch first, since this problem demands some formalism (atleast the way i did it)

twilit field
#

Are you asking me for a proof skecth?

oak nymph
#

Yes

twilit field
# oak nymph Yes

Okay, we start off by fixing an element, say,x, in G, and taking the union (A)of all its epsilon neighbourhoods of x. If there's no other elment in $G$, we're done, if not, we consider a point outside (A), which is in $G$. If any epsilon-neigbourhood contains $A$, we re-define $A$ to be the union of the original A and all epsilon neigbhourhoods of $y$, if no eps- neighbourhood contains $A$, we define the union of all epsilon neighbourhoods of $y$ to be a new set, and continue this process

grand pondBOT
oak nymph
#

Okay, but you havent addressed the important problems that may arise with this

#

One of which you pointed out yourself

twilit field
#

that it may not be countable ?

oak nymph
#

Not that, the first is the termination

#

Second, do you see a problem with "if any epsilon neighbourhood contains A, we re define it..."

twilit field
oak nymph
#

No, it leads to "unexpected behaviuour" so to speak

#

Lets say your open set was (1,2) U (3,4)

twilit field
oak nymph
#

Still

#

Its a problem

oak nymph
#

Then what is A?

twilit field
#

(1,2)

#

oh

oak nymph
#

Now pick 3.5=y

twilit field
#

that's not in G

oak nymph
#

Typo

oak nymph
#

There is an epsilon neighbourhood of 3.5 containing A

twilit field
#

then(3,4)

twilit field
twilit field
#

So I have to construct it more carefully

oak nymph
#

Here is a sketch i have, which you can see if you want:

||You know the open set is a union of open intervals, call that set of intervals S.||

||Say two intervals A and B in S are related if they are "connected" i.e there are intervals J1,J2,J3,...,Jn in S such that J1=A and Jn=B, and Jk intersects J(k+1) for k in {1,2,..,n-1}||

||this relation is an equivalence relation, and the union of all sets in an equivalence class is in turn another intervals||

||Equivalence classes are disjoint, giving you disjointness.||

||Now prove that there are countable many classes:
Every class is an interval, so we can find a rational in it then...||

twilit field
#

okay, thanks

twilit field
#

or even compactness

oak nymph
#

I meant connected in a non formal way

#

Hence the quotes

#

Think of the intervals in S as vertices in a graph. And draw an edge between two vertices if they intersect, then there being a path between two vertices (i.e the two vertices being "connected") is the same as the equivalence relation i have written

twilit field
#

Could you explain this bit too please

oak nymph
# twilit field Could you explain this bit too please

I worded that badly. Strictly speaking the equivalence classes are not intervals: what i meant is ||the union of all intervals in a class is inturn an interval, and in each of these intervals you can find a rational. Since the intervals are disjoint, you have an injection into the rationals||

twilit field
#

ah

#

that's smart

#

thanks

twilit field
#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @twilit field

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

midnight plankBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

blazing moat
#

how do I solve this? I don't understand what's going on 😭 ts sat problems are so weird 😭

ebon mica
#

what can you notice about the 2 equations

blazing moat
#

second one is *3 of the first one

ebon mica
#

mhm

#

so that means...

#

how would a point on the first graph appear be related to the second graph

blazing moat
#

uhhh idk 😭

ebon mica
#

well

#

the 2 graphs are the same, right?

#

because one is just the other times 3

blazing moat
#

yea

ebon mica
#

so if one point is on one of the graphs

#

then its automatically on the other one

#

because both of them are the same

#

would you agree with that?

blazing moat
#

yea

ebon mica
#

so now you just need to find any one point from either graph in terms of r

#

do you think you can do that

blazing moat
#

5x + 8y = 9 --> y = -5/8x + 9/8 it kinda looks similar to the answer but idk how to relate with r

#

😭

#

do i just do x = r

ebon mica
blazing moat
#

oh ok

#

thanks for helping :)

#

i get it

#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @blazing moat

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

ebon mica
#

it doesnt necessarily have to be x = r though

#

it could maybe be y = r too

blazing moat
#

yea

#

like any number

#

r

ebon mica
#

try it out and ping me if you run into any problems

midnight plankBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dusty portal
#

What is $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{H_{n+2}}{n(n+2)}$?

grand pondBOT
frozen talon
#

who is H?

dusty portal
grand pondBOT
frozen talon
#

have you tried treating it like it's telescoping?

dusty portal
frozen talon
#

maybe you can find some recursive relation on ({\left(\frac{H_{n+2}}{n(n+2)}\right)}_{n=1}^{\infty})

grand pondBOT
midnight plankBOT
#

@dusty portal Has your question been resolved?

dusty portal
#

Ugh

#

My internet went out, sorry

#

I’ll be back in a few

steel crest
#

my intuition says

#

to.split 1/(n(n+2)) first

#

partial fractions

dusty portal
steel crest
#

what do you get for the pfd?

dusty portal
grand pondBOT
steel crest
#

hm, okay

#

and you have, lets see

#

idk.the answer btw

dusty portal
#

Me neither

#

Actually wait it's 1/2 apparently but no verification

steel crest
#

1/2(H[n+2]/n-H[n+2]/(n+2))

#

looks promising

#

what happens if you write H[n+2]=H[n]+remainder

dusty portal
#

remainder=1/(n+1)+1/(n+2)

steel crest
#

so we have

#

not writing 1/2 because im on my phone and parens are annoying

#

H[n]/n +(1/(n+1))/n + (1/(n+2))/n - H[n+2]/(n+2)

dusty portal
steel crest
#

now do the same

dusty portal
#

Ookie

#

So uh

steel crest
#

for H[n+2] on the right most term

#

maybe cancelations happen

dusty portal
#

$\qty(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{H_n}n-\frac{H_{n+2}}{n+2})+\frac52$

dusty portal
grand pondBOT
fallow scarab
dusty portal
#

Thank you for cooking 🧑‍🍳

steel crest
dusty portal
steel crest
#

that will be $4

dusty portal
#

Now I know

steel crest
dusty portal
#

Am just lazy sometimes ig 😔

fallow scarab
steel crest
#

just write out the first few terms

fallow scarab
#

you haven't done 100 partial fraction decompositions like the rest of us

dusty portal
dusty portal
#

Ok danke everyone

steel crest
#

wait

#

the answer is 1/2 how

dusty portal
#

Idk

#

I never verified

steel crest
#

gl

dusty portal
#

💀

#

I'm satisfied for now

fallow scarab
dusty portal
#

,close

#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dusty portal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

dusty portal
steel crest
#

id expect a pi term

#

because zeta(2)=pi²/6

#

.reopen

midnight plankBOT
#

steel crest
#

oh wait

#

WAIT

dusty portal
#

wut?

steel crest
#

i missed something obvious

#

sum H[n+2]/(n+2)

#

can be reindexed

#

instead of n+2 going from 1 to infinity

#

wait reindex the other one

dusty portal
steel crest
#

if you dont want negative indices

steel crest
#

sum H[n]/n for n>=1

#

is the same as

dusty portal
steel crest
#

not 7/4?

#

oh bc from before

#

5/2

#

so its 17/4 and 1/2 from before so its 17/8

#

okay nm

#

ty

dusty portal
#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dusty portal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

midnight plankBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

earnest mica
#

.close

chilly cobalt
#

I have that $a_1 = \frac{1}{3}$ and $a_{n+1} = \frac{2a_n^2 + 1}{3}$. How do i show that this sequence approaches 1/2?

grand pondBOT
#

Copter

chilly cobalt
#

this is part of a bigger problem but this is all i need right now

lavish venture
chilly cobalt
#

induction?

#

how do i show the limit part ;-;

white gate
#

once it is convergent then lim a_n = L

lavish venture
white gate
#

L = (2L^2 + 1) / 3

lavish venture
#

you have a quadratic

chilly cobalt
#

ohhh okay

#

this showed up in an olym and usually stuff like this is never used so😭

white gate
#

believe me, this will show up a lot

#

and could be even more

chilly cobalt
#

sadge

#

wait is my solution even correct

#

ill type the original problem one sec

#

Let $f: \mathbb{R}^+ \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+$ be a function such that $\ f(3x) \geq f(f(2x)) + x \forall x \in \mathbb{R}^+ \$ find the largest constant $c$ such that $f(x) \geq cx$ for all x

grand pondBOT
#

Copter

chilly cobalt
#

and then c = 1/2 yeah?

white gate
#

wait

#

so the initial problem you gave is related to this problem?

chilly cobalt
#

yep

white gate
#

oh i see

#

i see how it relates now

chilly cobalt
#

i let $f(x) \geq a_n x$ and that implies $a_{n+1} = ...$

grand pondBOT
#

Copter

chilly cobalt
#

this should be right then

white gate
#

yeah

chilly cobalt
#

LETS GOOO

#

tysm man!!

#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @chilly cobalt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

chilly cobalt
#

absolute cinema

white gate
#

nice problem tho

chilly cobalt
#

imosl stuff

midnight plankBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

frozen arch
#

how do u do this

midnight plankBOT
sudden yacht
#

By recalling the definition of real and imaginary part...

#

There's not much to explain, honestly

gaunt nimbus
#

ye..

sudden yacht
#

If you write z = a + ib, this is the cartesian form.

a is the real part
b is the imaginary part

gaunt nimbus
grand pondBOT
grim vector
#

And if there is nothing its 0

gaunt nimbus
#

von Neumann..

#

the ordinals 😭

frozen arch
#

oh thanks lol

#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @frozen arch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

midnight plankBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

soft dagger
#

What's the intuition behind matrix multiplication?

gaunt plume
#

I guess the most useful / intuitive way of thinking about them is as linear functions on vector spaces

#

If you know how that works

chilly cobalt
soft dagger
gaunt plume
#

I actually don't know how to type vectors in latex but I'll try without. In the two dimensional case, the matrix (a b) (c d) sends (1,0) to (a,c), and (0,1) to (b, d)

#

Basically each of the columns says where the basis vectors go

#

And then it turns out that matrix multiplication is equivalent to composition

#

Then from that you can work out the actual rules of matrix multiplication

#

If that makes sense

unique juniper
#

just this bit might answer you... maybe?

soft dagger
#

Ty gang

unique juniper
#

linear algebra stuff i think

twilit field
#

Another way is to think of this as a way to compose functions

lyric charm
#

unironically he does an excellent job explaining this intuition

little anvil
royal glen
#

man I fucking love math

midnight plankBOT
#

@soft dagger Has your question been resolved?

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

midnight plankBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jade magnet
midnight plankBOT
jade magnet
#

so it doesnt say that at either points P and Q that the tangents are the same right?

lyric charm
#

tangents?

#

to whom

jade magnet
#

oh wait mb

#

one tangent

#

because (a^2)x is a straight line

#

actually wtf am i talking about

lyric charm
#

yeah wtf are you talking about indeed.

jade magnet
#

so like we know (a^2)x = x(b-x)^2

lyric charm
#

yes

jade magnet
#

so a^2(x) = x(x^2-bx+b^2)

#

so (x^2-2bx+b^2) = a^2?

#

assuming x isnt 0

#

ofc

lyric charm
#

(b-x)^2 = x^2 - 2bx + b^2.

jade magnet
#

yeah sorry idk why i forgot to type that

#

wait so does a equal b-x when x is not equal to 0?

#

because if it does i can substitute that

#

wait actually no i cant

jade magnet
lyric charm
#

i think you're kinda overthinking it

jade magnet
#

yeah probably

lyric charm
#

massively at that

#

you've got it down to $(x-b)^2 = a^2$

grand pondBOT
lyric charm
#

thus $x-b = \pm a$

grand pondBOT
jade magnet
#

oh

#

so x = a + b or x = b - a

#

but since we want P it'll be b-a

#

the tangent of the curve is 3x^2 - 4bx + b^2 so we can just substitute b-a this time now

#

2b^2 - 4ab + 3a^2

#

is the gradient

#

acc no i made some sort of mistake

#

clearly

#

a(3a-2b) means i should have got 3a^2 - 2ba not 3a^2 - 4ba + 2b^2

#

wait i know why

jade magnet
#

okay NOW i should get the right answer

#

okay yeah that fixes the issue

#

okay i get it now

#

idk why it took me this long

#

.closed

#

huh

#

.closed

#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @jade magnet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

twilit field
#

I'd like to prove if a set is compact, then it's is closed and bounded

frank wolf
#

mhm

lyric charm
#

remind us what defn you are using for compactness?

twilit field
#

If a set is compact every open cover of it has a finite subcover.

frank wolf
#

So you've got a subset $X \subset \mathbb{R}^n$

grand pondBOT
#

Pseudo (Cat theory #1 Fan)

frank wolf
#

which is compact in the subspace topology

lyric charm
#

this is not phrased correctly

frank wolf
#

and you want to show that, as a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$, it is closed and bounded

twilit field
#

Let's say I'm working with R

grand pondBOT
#

Pseudo (Cat theory #1 Fan)

lyric charm
#

do you mean "we call a set compact if ..."

#

is that your definition yes or no

twilit field
#

and F \substeq R

lyric charm
#

is that your DEFINITION yes or no?

#

or is your definition something else?

lyric charm
#

i could have sworn i saw ppl imply you're not using this as defn back in hlounge

twilit field
#

Well, this is my defn

frank wolf
#

i see

lyric charm
#

oh no i was wrong

frank wolf
#

so which of compact => closed, compact => bounded do you want to start with

lyric charm
#

contraposition can get at least half of the job done

frank wolf
#

hm true

frank wolf
#

i see

lyric charm
#
  1. unbounded => not compact
  2. not closed => not compact
#

#1 is easy if you understand what a set not being compact means

frank wolf
#

yes i would second Ann's suggestion

twilit field
#

yea thought of that too, was going to do that

#

just want it verified

lyric charm
#

first what letter do you want to use for your set

#

pick one and stick with that choice throughout

twilit field
#

F

lyric charm
#

ok

#

can you formulate what it means for F to not be compact

twilit field
#

A set F is not compact if there exists an open cover of F without a finite subcover

lyric charm
#

ok

#

so let's suppose now F is unbounded

#

construct an open cover of F which does not admit a finite subcover

twilit field
#

(n-1,n+1), n\in Z

lyric charm
#

well the union of these guys is R so it covering F is obvious

frank wolf
#

-# strictly should you not intersect these with F?

lyric charm
#

can you prove that no finite subcollection of these intervals can possibly cover F

lyric charm
#

we're not considering F as a topological space in and of itself here

frank wolf
#

i guess it depends how you define open cover

#

i see

twilit field
#

Let there be a finite subcover covering $F$. Then its union is bounded

lyric charm
#

what's G

grand pondBOT
twilit field
#

typo

lyric charm
#

why is the union of that finite subcover bounded

twilit field
frank wolf
#

that sounds reasonable

#

I think you can also do this in a more direct way

twilit field
frank wolf
#

then it has a finite subcover

#

which, by your argument above, is bounded

#

so F is also bounded, since it’s contained in a bounded set

frank wolf
#

it doesn’t really matter though, both arguments are good

twilit field
#

now to prove if F is not compact it need not be closed

frank wolf
#

wait hm

#

you want to prove compact => closed

#

contrapositive is not closed => not compact

frank wolf
twilit field
#

oops

#

right

frank wolf
#

also remember that not closed isn’t the same as open!!

twilit field
#

We first prove if F is not closed or not bounded, then it's not compact. If $F$ is not bounded, consider the open cover $(n-1,n+1)$. No finite collection of this contains $F$, thus $F$ is not compact. Let $F$ not be closed, there then exists a limit point of $F$ not in it. Let this limit point be $q$. Then let an open cover of $F$ be the interval of the smallest eps neigbourhood containing all of $F \cup ( \frac{1}{n}, \frac{n \cdot t}{n+1})$

grand pondBOT
#

wai

We first prove if F is not closed or not  bounded, then it's not compact.  If $F$ is not bounded, consider the open cover $(n-1,n+1)$. No finite collection of this contains $F$, thus $F$ is not compact. Let $F$ not be closed, there then exists a limit point of $F$ not in it. Let this limit point be $q$. Then  let an open cover of $F$ be  the interval of the smallest eps neigbourhood  containing all of $F$ \cup ( \frac{1}{n}, \frac{n \cdot t}{n+1})$
```Compilation error:```! Missing $ inserted.
<inserted text> 
                $
l.1422 ...neigbourhood  containing all of $F$ \cup
                                                   ( \frac{1}{n}, \frac{n \c...
I've inserted a begin-math/end-math symbol since I think
you left one out. Proceed, with fingers crossed.

Preview: Tightpage -1310720 -1310720 1310720 1310720
[1{/usr/local/texlive/2023/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}]
(./796939110815629322.aux)```
twilit field
#

The second part is very badly worded

frank wolf
#

yeah I can’t quite tell what you’re trying to say

twilit field
#

We define $F$ to be the smallest $\varepsilon-$ neigbourhood containing all of $F$.Let this be $F'$. We then define an open subcover $G$ to be ${S \mid S = F'\cup ( \frac{1}{n}, \frac{n \cdot t}{n+1} )}$

grand pondBOT
twilit field
#

where n \in \Z \setminus {0}

twilit field
#

We define $F$ to be the smallest $\varepsilon-$ neigbourhood containing all of $F$.Let this be $F'$. We then define an open subcover $G$ to be ${S \mid S = F'\cup ( \frac{1}{n}, \frac{n \cdot t}{n+1} )}$

grand pondBOT
frank wolf
#

Isn’t F a subset of R

twilit field
#

I messed up big time

#

sorry

twilit field
grand pondBOT
twilit field
#

and $t$ is a limit point of $F$ not in it

grand pondBOT
twilit field
#

so we define an open subcover of $F$, to be $G = {S \mid S = F' \cup (\frac{1}{n},\frac{n \cdot t}{n+1}); n \in \Z \setminus{0}$

grand pondBOT
twilit field
twilit field
lyric charm
twilit field
#

I was doing some research into that, apparently not?

#

just did that

lyric charm
#

btw your proof is suffering from a lack of paragraphs and textual structure

#

writing everything in a single paragraph is a good way to lose your reader

twilit field
#

I'll re-write it properly

lyric charm
#

have some mercy on them

#

anyway

#

right now you're trying to prove that a non-closed F has an open cover w/o a finite subcover, yes?

twilit field
#

yes

lyric charm
#

ok

#

so you say that F has a limit point outside itself

#

and you named it... t, by the looks of it

#

do you want nudges towards the right construction or would you like me to just give it to you

twilit field
#

nudges please

lyric charm
#

you dont know how F is shaped around t or for that matter anywhere else. so the opens in your construction would want to be "big" somehow in order to be sure to cover F

#

i say big in a decidedly informal sense

twilit field
#

So I need to construct an open set containing ideally all but an epsilon neigbourhood of t

lyric charm
#

you're thinking in the right direction here yes

#

i will also advise against trying to write it in interval notation

twilit field
#

I was thinking of writing it as a set difference of R and a closed set

lyric charm
#

easiest to write it in setbuilder notation

#

also has the bonus that itll generalize to R^d

#

cause the cover that you gave for unbounded => not compact is also generalizable

twilit field
#

${x \mid \exists \varepsilon : V_{\varepsilon}(x) \var \cap {t} = \varnothing}$

grand pondBOT
lyric charm
#

uhhh

#

what is $V_{\ep}(x) \delta$?

grand pondBOT
lyric charm
#

also what is that set...

#

like what's it meant to be

twilit field
#

wait, where did the delta come from

#

ooh

lyric charm
#

presumably when you typed \var.

#

$\var$

grand pondBOT
lyric charm
#

hm.

#

idk what that is doing there though

twilit field
#

I meant to type varepslion earlier on, must have not removed that

#

${x \mid \exists \varepsilon : V_{\varepsilon}(x) \cap {t} = \varnothing}$

grand pondBOT
lyric charm
#

taken at face value, the set you've just described is R \ {t}.

#

which does not do us much good.

twilit field
#

lemme try a bit harder

lyric charm
#

remember you want to describe a COLLECTION OF SETS, not merely one set.

#

perhaps parameterized by something.

twilit field
#

Parameterised by t

lyric charm
#

npoe

#

nope*

#

t is fixed

#

it's a point that is a limit pt of F but doesn't lie in F

#

i say "trying hard" may lead you to breaking your own back

twilit field
#

so think simple

lyric charm
#

yes think simple

twilit field
#

A part of the open cover can be the sets of the form (t-n-1, t-n) and (t+n,t+n+1) , where n in in N

#

Then we have to find another open cover in [t-1,t+1]

lyric charm
#

mmmm

#

you're kinda introducing unnecessary complexity here

twilit field
#

hmm?

lyric charm
#

here is something to help you remove one of the layers of it

#

(a, +∞) is an open set

#

so is (-∞, a)

#

for any real a

twilit field
#

yes

lyric charm
#

think about your "all but an epsilon nbhd of t" again

twilit field
#

as t is a limit point, every eps neighbourhood intersects F at some point

lyric charm
#

every epsilon nbhd of t intersects F at some point, yes

#

that's gonna be important later

twilit field
#

in that case we can't construct an eps neigbourhood around t, can we?

lyric charm
#

when you say "can't" do you mean "unable" or "unhelpful"

twilit field
#

unable

#

well, especially if it's sandwiched b/w two parts of F

#

Could I have the construction please, or should I think about this a while longer?

lyric charm
#

eh let me spare you the misery

#

the collection of opens that i was specifically thinking of is something like: $$E_{\ep}(t) := { x \in \bR : |x-t| > \ep}$$ with $\ep > 0$

grand pondBOT
lyric charm
#

E stands for exterior

#

but don't think too hard about that

#

if you want your collection to be countable you can take only E_{1/n}(t) into your cover

twilit field
#

Eh, that's fine

lyric charm
#

$\bigcup_{\ep>0} E_{\ep}(t) = \bR \setminus {t}$

grand pondBOT
lyric charm
#

and try to think about what happens if you take the intersection of some finite subcollection of these "exterior-ball" sets

twilit field
#

We get a subset of the exterior of t

twilit field
lyric charm
twilit field
#

wdym

#

Ok, yeah, this is really simple, I get that

twilit field
twilit field
#

atleast not that I can recall

lyric charm
twilit field
#

We get a subset of R\ {t}

lyric charm
#

i mean, no shit.

#

im gonna say you need to actually sit down and write out what happens if we take a finite subcover of my cover.

lyric charm
#

ok so consider the subcover consisting of $E_{\ep_1}, E_{\ep_2}, \dots, E_{\ep_n}$ (dropping the $(t)$ from each one cause i cbf to write it), and let's also say $\ep_1 > \ep_2 > \dots > \ep_n$ for convenience.

grand pondBOT
lyric charm
#

what's the union of just these guys

twilit field
#

E_{\eps_n}

lyric charm
#

ok and what can you say about E_{ε_n}

#

keeping in mind your goal of showing that my open cover does not admit a finite subcover

twilit field
lyric charm
#

technically correct but misses the point

twilit field
#

it doesn't cover all of the subcover?

lyric charm
#

words ouch

twilit field
#

every finite subcover misses out some point of the open cover

lyric charm
#

simpler tbh

#

$F$ has nonempty intersection with the $\ep_n$-neighborhood of $t$, so it has at least one point lying in $V_{\ep_n}(t)$ and thus outside $E_{\ep_n}(t)$. thus $F \nsubseteq E_{\ep_n}(t)$.

grand pondBOT
twilit field
#

ah right

#

thanks

#

I'll close this now, thanks so mcuh!

#

*much

#

.close

midnight plankBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @twilit field

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

midnight plankBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

safe onyx
midnight plankBOT
safe onyx
#

I got halfway through and got undefined so imma restart getting help 😓

#

$F\left(x,y,z\right)=xz \vec i+x \vec j+y \vec k$

grand pondBOT
#

smeagol

safe onyx
#

$S \to y=\sqrt{9-x^{2}-z^{2}}$

grand pondBOT
#

smeagol

safe onyx
#

$a(r,\theta) = r \cos(\theta) \hat i + \sqrt{9-r^2} \hat j + r \sin(\theta) \hat k$

grand pondBOT
#

smeagol

safe onyx
#

S parameterized

#

Then the normal would be

#

$a_r \cross a_{\theta}$

grand pondBOT
#

smeagol

safe onyx
#

$a_r = \cos {\theta} \hat i - \frac{r}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} \hat j + \sin{\theta} \hat k$

#

$a_\theta = -rsin(\theta) \hat i + 0 \hat j + r \cos{\theta} \hat k$

grand pondBOT
#

smeagol

dawn dagger
#

You forgot the square root

grand pondBOT
#

smeagol

safe onyx
#

so the cross product is

#

$n = \frac{r^2 cos \theta}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} \hat i - ( - r \sin^2 \theta - r cos^2 \theta) \hat j + \frac{r^2 \sin \theta}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} \hat k$

grand pondBOT
#

smeagol

safe onyx
#

$n = \frac{r^2 cos \theta}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} \hat i + r \hat j + \frac{r^2 \sin \theta}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} \hat k$

grand pondBOT
#

smeagol

safe onyx
#

does this look ok so far?

dawn dagger
#

,w (cos(theta), -r/sqrt(9-r^2), sin(theta)) x (-rsin(theta),0,rcos(theta))

dawn dagger
#

Should be right so far.

safe onyx
#

j should be positive here

#

since it says y is positive

dawn dagger
#

Yes, that's why I said it's right so far.

safe onyx
#

yeah

dawn dagger
#

The cross product a x b = - b x a is not commutative

#

What were your next steps?

safe onyx
#

next I need to make n a unit vector and divide it by it's magnitude?

#

$|n| = \sqrt{ \frac{r^4 \cos^2 \theta}{9-r^2} + r^2 + \frac{r^4 \sin^2 \theta}{9-r^2}}$

dawn dagger
#

If I recall correctly we didn't have to...

grand pondBOT
#

smeagol

safe onyx
#

oh right

#

cause the magnitudes cancel out

#

so I just need n dot F

dawn dagger
#

Yeah exactly

safe onyx
dawn dagger
#

What are the bounds btw?

safe onyx
#

r goes from 0 to 3
theta goes from 0 to 2pi

dawn dagger
#

Ok nice!

safe onyx
#

$F(a(r,\theta)) = r^2 \cos(\theta) \sin(\theta) \hat i + r \cos\theta \hat j + \sqrt{9-r^2} \hat k$

grand pondBOT
#

smeagol

dawn dagger
#

Looks good.

safe onyx
#

that dotted with n is

dawn dagger
#

,w (r^2cos(theta)sin(theta), rcos(theta), sqrt(9-r^2)) . (r^2cos(theta)/sqrt(9-r^2),r,r^2sin(theta)/sqrt(9-r^2))

#

wth

safe onyx
#

$\frac{ r^4 cos^2 \theta \sin \theta}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} + r^2 \cos \theta + r^2 \sin \theta$

grand pondBOT
#

smeagol

safe onyx
#

looks the same

dawn dagger
#

yea

safe onyx
#

it just is bulky underneath

#

then I can integrate than rdrdtheta?

dawn dagger
#

in fact the bulky had nothing to do with the request KEK

safe onyx
#

computer brain fat

dawn dagger
safe onyx
#

$\int^{2\pi}_0 \int^3_0 ( \frac{r^5 \cos^2 \theta \sin \theta}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} + r^3 \cos\theta + r^3 \sin \theta ) drd\theta$

dawn dagger
#

\int_{0}^{2\pi}

grand pondBOT
#

smeagol

dawn dagger
#

I think for the left term integral wrt r I would do || u = 9-r² ||

safe onyx
#

desmos says it's undefined

dawn dagger
#

The other terms r^3(cos(theta)+sin(theta)) should be 0

#

because you integrate them over [0,2\pi)

safe onyx
#

gotcha

dawn dagger
safe onyx
#

ok now it's not so angry

#

I took care of the r^3costheta and r^3 sin theta

#

why solve the r side when all the cos sin are 0 heh

dawn dagger
# safe onyx

Hmm yeah, given that r^5/sqrt(9-r^2) will return some constant, again the integral over [0,2pi) of cosine and sine will be 0.

safe onyx
#

yep

#

love all this work to get just 0