#help-49
1 messages · Page 212 of 1
(\sum _n 5a(n)=5\sum_n a(n))
PajamaMamaLlama
Well write out the sum and see
Sum of xn + x^n
like that?
How would i write it on the right side
(\sum _n a(n) + b(n) =\sum_n a(n) + \sum_n b(n))
Like this ?
(\sum _n a(n) + b(n) =\sum_n a(n) + \sum_n b(n))
Fire
that is also a property of finite summation, yes but read more from Riemann's links
No like
\(a\)
PajamaMamaLlama
Is sum a(n) + b(n(
Aplying sum on b(n) aswell
Or i need to put parenthesis to show i wanna include b(n)
read
Thats basically what im asking
depends
I dont wanna know identities
for that I usually include parentheses
I wanna know what the notation means
to clear up any ambiguity
Like example
For sin operator
We use sin(something)
And sin is applied to everything in parenthesis
you're asking about:
(\sum_n(a(n)+b(n))) vs. (\sum_n a(n)+b(n))?
PajamaMamaLlama
explained at the top
this?
and below the identities
Yes they are the same
If n is coming from the sum and you don't have it anywhere else, it's pretty clear
but if you're writing it, I prefer to use the former to clear up any ambiguity
Whats that with parenthesis?
Like here are outside parenthesis needed to show that C isnt included in sum?
Or not
I put cause i thought sum doesn't end its just whatever is on the right of Σ
Yes, this is how I would write it, in the second picture you might leave off the inner () because you have a_k in the second summand and it's clear the k could only come from the sum
But it's still better like this
Ok thanks
Some people might write stuff like $\dst \sum_{k = 1}^\infty \arctan\l(\frac{1}{k^2}\r) + 5$ though, without worrying about this
Kepe
In this expression
(This would be written badly but from context it should become clear)
exactly the ambiguity good parentheses resolves
There is no yes/no here, it depends on context entirely, this is written badly
Oh ok
You look at the line above this
I don't see any reason to think the 5 is part of the summation?
been hearing about Γ and ζ function what are those in ? Like course
Idk if i should have learnt them already or they are later on
Yeah, surely it wouldn't be included there if we are reasonable
it could be, depends on the context, even if it is ridiculous it's a demonstration
analytic number theory
and other places
those are special functions but if you're only in Calc III from your previous questions you don't have to worry abt them rn
Gamma(x) is the generalization of the factorial
zeta usually the Riemann zeta function
(\Gamma (n)=\int_0^\infty t^{n-1}e^{-t}dt=(n-1)!) and (\zeta(s)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^s})
PajamaMamaLlama
I just finished calc 3 theory
(might've messed up the integral
but those are the defintiions)
Im solving challenging for me problems so i learn everything to the fullest
And ill then move on to a new
Idk which prob complex analysis
complex analyssi is usually a higher divison course
I might suggest LinAlg
and if you're big into theory then Axler
my university used Lay's Linear Algebra
I already did
Idk what level i have completed
But i did most matrix stuff and transformations etc
subspaces, vector spans, orthgonality, etc too?
I haven't seen linear algebra split into multiple classes?
Oh
so I am unfamiliar with the terms and wouldn't be able to comment
split in two for me too
In Aristotelian university here in Greeceit is
I mean those i think are same semester with complex analysis
For this university
la2 is multilinear algebra (properly defining the determinant, dual spaces, tensor stuff)
huh
Same with conplex analysis
Ahhh I see, alr yeah I haven't heard it called la2 before
The canonical forms, singular value decomposition
diagonlization as a special case was la1
Where would i study that
Here la1 is first semester, la2 second
You know any website first saying definitions and then theorems then afterwards giving problems to solve
la2 might be different here idk
Are you a math major?
idk of any websites, but you've kinda just described a textbook 
Im not in uni yet
Yes online ?
I used math.lamar.edu or wtv
Had most def/theorems
Here's Lay's Linear Algebra
Sheldon Axler's book is put up online
Oh ok
Though it's pretty big
Wdym pretty big
Like 400 or so pages
Just finished highschool so idk im kinda just hoping that the websites i use are valid
So a total of around 200 pages
Yeah that's good, sounds like the beginning of la1
Yea i thought the rest is much more advanced since wasnt in the book i was using
So i just thought id wait for later on
Also it depends on if you do actual abstract linear algebra like a math major or just the computational version of it
I heard for engineering students etc. they have a computational version
Nah i am going to be in engineering uni in octomber
But till them
I just wanna do pure maths
For fun
cool!
Im probably gonna keep doing math till i finish all courses in math uni even if its after engineering
By the way, this is a classic: Prof. Strang has video recordings of his MIT lectures https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/18-06-linear-algebra-spring-2010/video_galleries/video-lectures/
You might complement this with Axler's book
I think Strang doesn't do any dual spaces or tensors for example
Is this all la 1?
Like will i learn all of la1 if i follow all those vids
I'd say this covers la1 and a little bit of la2
Ok
Ill follow this course
But when i get home im away rn and its not good on phone prob
Atleast that's how it should be roughly at my uni
Rn i just do random stuff
imo parts of LA empowers a lot of math both more applied things like stats/optimization/differential equations and more pure stuff like functional analysis, differential geometry, even abstract algebra. The list goes on.
Im doing int a/x^n +b dx rn
Yeah functional analysis is basically just linear algebra and then trying to apply a bunch of analysis to it
Where n=2k kEN
Mk
Can you dm me this
Link
So i remember
.close
.close
Closed by @languid mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i know its not hard i js forgot how to do this
there is only a handful of circles related theorem in school maths. Which one do you think fits this situation?
You have two chords intersecting, and you know the lengths of three parts
hmmm
abbc = cddc
if you want me to validate your guess, then it would be better if you specify what ab, bc etc. are
Ok
soooo a is 2 and b is x and c is 3 and d is 4
umm, that seems so wrong
idk bro
can you answer this?
\😭
Do you know a theorem called power of a point?
no
umm, thats true for all triangles. Similarity is like when two triangles are same shape but different sizes, like one is a zoomed out/scaled version of the other
oh like kinda like tranformations
well duh
i think its geometry hnrs
let me redraw the diagram
alr
if you remove the third chord that has z, the remaining figure would look something like this
ohh so x=z
u dilated the circle
i did no such thing
i am only ignoring the third chord for the time being since it has no use in finding x
the length 6 comes from the fact that 6 = 4+2
these two combined are 6 units long
ye
then do i do b(a+b) = d(c+d)
can you tell me what the a,b,c,d you say are?
oh ok
yea exactlyl
thats the power of a point theorem
just curious, since you dont know the name, what do you call this result, if not power of a point?
the x value

like how did you know this is a thing?
what made you say ae times ed = be time ec
oh ok
yea
Closed by @analog carbon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ty, you too
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
All options are wrong
How come?
well, the last option looks closest to the answer 
Remember you can't just take the sqrt of 625 and 0.0025 to get the answer
Since they're combined into 1 number they'll interfere with one another
How can you say?
I don't think it is good
.close
Closed by @molten bay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
sorry to poke on a closed channel but the last one is the answer
,w √625.0025
you probably should have went one or two digits further
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Two congruent rectangles ABCD and CEFO are placed inside a circle with center O and radius 5. Find the CG/GO.
Is BCF = 90 degrees?
"BCF = 90°" and "B, C, F collinear" contradict each other
why
if three points are collinear they form a 180° angle not 90°...
oh mb its ABF = 90 degree and B-C-F collinear
anyway triangle ABF is right and angle ABC is also right so yes BCF are collinear
Closed by @neat silo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Option C can not be possible because they are asking of P(2)
And B,A are not linearly independence
Yeah
Yep
Closed by @molten bay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I feel pretty stupid asking for help for this ( lack of sleep ) but I completely forgot how to find the perimeter
- is this all that they give you
- are you currently in a test
Its the sum of all the sides so if you figure out the lengths youll get it
- the perimeter of any shape is the sum of all of its side lengths
as oakley just said
I know this but can’t find a way to get that last length
i think saying "completely forgot" is an unjustified exaggeration.
Treat that segment like a triangle
i think its safe to assume that all angles except the two on the left are right angles
cuck question for not being explicit
Nah not really I usually don’t get questions like these anymore so I forget what to do
do you have any ideas to start?
6+2+2+3+a+8
a^2=(8-3-2)^2 + (6-2)^2
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
and also we dont know that the right-looking angles really are right
my bad.
oh god.
well in that case
this has too many variables
i think the current verdict is that this question is underspecified and cannot be solved yes
yes
if you arent told thise are 90°s, you basically have here a series of equations that give no solution
thats what i am saying.
and your teacher
if they didnt say "this is 90 degrees"
you have no answer to tell your teacher.
Ok thx for the help
np
but yeah man, your teacher gave you no info, and thats a teacher mistake.
@lapis pawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lapis pawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $G$ be an open subset of $\R$, then $G$ is the union of a collection of open interval such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item The pairwise intersection is empty
\item The collection is countable
\end{enumerate}
wai
I need help with part (1), rather writing a proper proof
wai
Let $x \in G$ be fixed , define $\Gamma = { V_{\varepsilon}(x) \mid V_{\varepsilon}(x) \subseteq G}$. Define $A = \bigcup {V{\varepsilon}(x) \in \Gamma}V_{\varepsilon}(x)$. Now consider $y \in G \land y \notin A$. We define $B$ similarly, if $A \subseteq B$, for some epsilon neighbourhood of $y$, we redefine $A$ to be the largest $\varepsilon-$neigbourhood containing both sests
wai
is this idea right y/n please
idea yes, execution not yet
tq
As in I have to describe why it terminates?
among other things, sure
What can you say about two open intervals in R that intersect
their intersection is open
A statement about their union would be nicer
Other than it being open as well, we which know
Their union is open, or something else?
Their union is another open interval
And do you know that every open set in R is a union of open intervals?
yes, prove that a while ago
Hmm, but I'm trying to prove we can construct a disjoint union
Ofcourse, that is what they want us to prove
I'd first like to proceed with my original idea if that's fine
Sure
you literally need that fact already to talk about the set A
what fact
Let $x \in G$ be fixed , define $\Gamma = { V_{\varepsilon}(x) \mid V_{\varepsilon}(x) \subseteq G}$. Define $A = \bigcup {V{\varepsilon}(x) \in \Gamma}V_{\varepsilon}(x)$. Now consider $y \in G \land y \notin A$. If there exists $\epsilon'$ such that $A \subseteq V_{\varepsilon'}(y)$, which is also an interval as the union of two open sets whose intesection is non-empty is an interval. Then redefine $A \text {to be } A \cup V_{\varepsilon'}(y)$ , else we define $B$ simialrly to the way we define $A$, but using $y$ in place of $x$.
the fact that the union of the intervals is again an interval
otherwise the set A would be useless to you
wai
@twilit field Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
yes please and (b), ist it right so far?
you do know that you have to satisfy both conditions at the same time, yes?
countability too?
yes
lemme think about that
Well i dont specifically know how to get from this to a solution, but id like to suggest start off by giving a proof sketch first, since this problem demands some formalism (atleast the way i did it)
Are you asking me for a proof skecth?
Yes
Okay, we start off by fixing an element, say,x, in G, and taking the union (A)of all its epsilon neighbourhoods of x. If there's no other elment in $G$, we're done, if not, we consider a point outside (A), which is in $G$. If any epsilon-neigbourhood contains $A$, we re-define $A$ to be the union of the original A and all epsilon neigbhourhoods of $y$, if no eps- neighbourhood contains $A$, we define the union of all epsilon neighbourhoods of $y$ to be a new set, and continue this process
wai
Okay, but you havent addressed the important problems that may arise with this
One of which you pointed out yourself
that it may not be countable ?
Not that, the first is the termination
Second, do you see a problem with "if any epsilon neighbourhood contains A, we re define it..."
redefining is a problem, I suppose?
No, it leads to "unexpected behaviuour" so to speak
Lets say your open set was (1,2) U (3,4)
oh, worded badly, if there exists an epsilon neigbourhood containing A
Lets say we picked x = 1.5
Then what is A?
Now pick 3.5=y
that's not in G
Typo
Now continue running your proof
There is an epsilon neighbourhood of 3.5 containing A
then(3,4)
right, but it also contains points not in G
Yes
So I have to construct it more carefully
Yes
Here is a sketch i have, which you can see if you want:
||You know the open set is a union of open intervals, call that set of intervals S.||
||Say two intervals A and B in S are related if they are "connected" i.e there are intervals J1,J2,J3,...,Jn in S such that J1=A and Jn=B, and Jk intersects J(k+1) for k in {1,2,..,n-1}||
||this relation is an equivalence relation, and the union of all sets in an equivalence class is in turn another intervals||
||Equivalence classes are disjoint, giving you disjointness.||
||Now prove that there are countable many classes:
Every class is an interval, so we can find a rational in it then...||
okay, thanks
Issue, haven't done connectedness yet
or even compactness
I meant connected in a non formal way
Hence the quotes
Think of the intervals in S as vertices in a graph. And draw an edge between two vertices if they intersect, then there being a path between two vertices (i.e the two vertices being "connected") is the same as the equivalence relation i have written
Could you explain this bit too please
I worded that badly. Strictly speaking the equivalence classes are not intervals: what i meant is ||the union of all intervals in a class is inturn an interval, and in each of these intervals you can find a rational. Since the intervals are disjoint, you have an injection into the rationals||
.close
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I solve this? I don't understand what's going on 😭 ts sat problems are so weird 😭
what can you notice about the 2 equations
second one is *3 of the first one
mhm
so that means...
how would a point on the first graph appear be related to the second graph
uhhh idk 😭
yea
so if one point is on one of the graphs
then its automatically on the other one
because both of them are the same
would you agree with that?
yea
so now you just need to find any one point from either graph in terms of r
do you think you can do that
5x + 8y = 9 --> y = -5/8x + 9/8 it kinda looks similar to the answer but idk how to relate with r
😭
do i just do x = r

Closed by @blazing moat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{H_{n+2}}{n(n+2)}$?
;(
who is H?
$H_n=\sum_{k=1}^n\frac1k$
;(
have you tried treating it like it's telescoping?
Yeah, but I don't know how exactly to go about that
maybe you can find some recursive relation on ({\left(\frac{H_{n+2}}{n(n+2)}\right)}_{n=1}^{\infty})
Flip
@dusty portal Has your question been resolved?
But I don't know what to do after that
what do you get for the pfd?
$\frac12\qty(\frac1n-\frac1{n+2})$
;(
1/2(H[n+2]/n-H[n+2]/(n+2))
looks promising
what happens if you write H[n+2]=H[n]+remainder
remainder=1/(n+1)+1/(n+2)
so we have
not writing 1/2 because im on my phone and parens are annoying
H[n]/n +(1/(n+1))/n + (1/(n+2))/n - H[n+2]/(n+2)

now do the same
$\qty(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{H_n}n-\frac{H_{n+2}}{n+2})+\frac52$
You're right lol
;(
yes flip was right
Thank you for cooking 🧑🍳

Idk how to do it though :((
that will be $4
Now I know
oh yes you do
Am just lazy sometimes ig 😔
don't forget to show your tablet showing 18%, 20%, and 22% tip
just write out the first few terms
you haven't done 100 partial fraction decompositions like the rest of us
So this'll be 1+(1+1/2)/2+5/2=1+3/4+5/2=7/4+10/4=17/4
But ->:((((((((((((((
Ok danke everyone
gl
hmmmmmmmmmmmm
Closed by @dusty portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

✅
wut?
i missed something obvious
sum H[n+2]/(n+2)
can be reindexed
instead of n+2 going from 1 to infinity
wait reindex the other one
No
if you dont want negative indices
I solved here, it telescopes
not 7/4?
oh bc from before
5/2
so its 17/4 and 1/2 from before so its 17/8
okay nm
ty
.close
Closed by @dusty portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
I have that $a_1 = \frac{1}{3}$ and $a_{n+1} = \frac{2a_n^2 + 1}{3}$. How do i show that this sequence approaches 1/2?
Copter
this is part of a bigger problem but this is all i need right now
first show it’s convergent then take the limit of both sides
once it is convergent then lim a_n = L
L = lim a_{n + 1} but also L = lim a_n
L = (2L^2 + 1) / 3
you have a quadratic
sadge
wait is my solution even correct
ill type the original problem one sec
Let $f: \mathbb{R}^+ \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+$ be a function such that $\ f(3x) \geq f(f(2x)) + x \forall x \in \mathbb{R}^+ \$ find the largest constant $c$ such that $f(x) \geq cx$ for all x
Copter
and then c = 1/2 yeah?
yep
i let $f(x) \geq a_n x$ and that implies $a_{n+1} = ...$
Copter
this should be right then
yeah
Closed by @chilly cobalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
absolute cinema
nice problem tho
imosl stuff
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do u do this
By recalling the definition of real and imaginary part...
There's not much to explain, honestly
ye..
If you write z = a + ib, this is the cartesian form.
a is the real part
b is the imaginary part
If you write $z = a + ib$, this is the cartesian form.\
\
${a}$ = ${\Re(z)}$ is the real part \
$b$ = $\Im(z)$ is the imaginary part
k
And if there is nothing its 0
Thanks 👍
Closed by @frozen arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's the intuition behind matrix multiplication?
I guess the most useful / intuitive way of thinking about them is as linear functions on vector spaces
If you know how that works
vectors
What exactly does that mean? Why and how did they come up with it? Any video suggestions?
I actually don't know how to type vectors in latex but I'll try without. In the two dimensional case, the matrix (a b) (c d) sends (1,0) to (a,c), and (0,1) to (b, d)
Basically each of the columns says where the basis vectors go
And then it turns out that matrix multiplication is equivalent to composition
Then from that you can work out the actual rules of matrix multiplication
If that makes sense
just this bit might answer you... maybe?
Ty gang
linear algebra stuff i think
Another way is to think of this as a way to compose functions
watch essence of linear algebra by 3b1b
unironically he does an excellent job explaining this intuition
Mat(u)*Mat(v)= Mat(u•v) with u and v two linear applications
man I fucking love math
@soft dagger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so it doesnt say that at either points P and Q that the tangents are the same right?
oh wait mb
one tangent
because (a^2)x is a straight line
actually wtf am i talking about
yeah wtf are you talking about indeed.
so like we know (a^2)x = x(b-x)^2
yes
(b-x)^2 = x^2 - 2bx + b^2.
yeah sorry idk why i forgot to type that
wait so does a equal b-x when x is not equal to 0?
because if it does i can substitute that
wait actually no i cant
or i could write it as x^3-2bx^2+(b^2-a^2)x = 0
i think you're kinda overthinking it
yeah probably
Ann
thus $x-b = \pm a$
Ann
oh
so x = a + b or x = b - a
but since we want P it'll be b-a
the tangent of the curve is 3x^2 - 4bx + b^2 so we can just substitute b-a this time now
2b^2 - 4ab + 3a^2
is the gradient
acc no i made some sort of mistake
clearly
a(3a-2b) means i should have got 3a^2 - 2ba not 3a^2 - 4ba + 2b^2
wait i know why
i put -2bx instead of -4bx
okay NOW i should get the right answer
okay yeah that fixes the issue
okay i get it now
idk why it took me this long
.closed
huh
.closed
.close
Closed by @jade magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'd like to prove if a set is compact, then it's is closed and bounded
mhm
remind us what defn you are using for compactness?
If a set is compact every open cover of it has a finite subcover.
So you've got a subset $X \subset \mathbb{R}^n$
Pseudo (Cat theory #1 Fan)
which is compact in the subspace topology
hold on
this is not phrased correctly
and you want to show that, as a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$, it is closed and bounded
Let's say I'm working with R
Pseudo (Cat theory #1 Fan)
A set F is compact if and only if every open cover of F has a finite
subcover
and F \substeq R
this is my defn
i could have sworn i saw ppl imply you're not using this as defn back in hlounge
Well, this is my defn
i see
oh no i was wrong
so which of compact => closed, compact => bounded do you want to start with
contraposition can get at least half of the job done
hm true
comapct -> bounded
i see
- unbounded => not compact
- not closed => not compact
#1 is easy if you understand what a set not being compact means
yes i would second Ann's suggestion
first what letter do you want to use for your set
pick one and stick with that choice throughout
F
A set F is not compact if there exists an open cover of F without a finite subcover
ok
so let's suppose now F is unbounded
construct an open cover of F which does not admit a finite subcover
(n-1,n+1), n\in Z
well the union of these guys is R so it covering F is obvious
-# strictly should you not intersect these with F?
can you prove that no finite subcollection of these intervals can possibly cover F
mehhhhhhh
we're not considering F as a topological space in and of itself here
yes, one minute
Let there be a finite subcover covering $F$. Then its union is bounded
what's G
wai
typo
why is the union of that finite subcover bounded
As there are finitely many intervals, we can take min of all the n-1 elements, and max of all the n+1 elements, and these will exist
as in not by contrapositive?
if you take this as an open cover of F, and assume F is compact
then it has a finite subcover
which, by your argument above, is bounded
so F is also bounded, since it’s contained in a bounded set
mhm
it doesn’t really matter though, both arguments are good
now to prove if F is not compact it need not be closed
wait hm
you want to prove compact => closed
contrapositive is not closed => not compact
I can’t quite parse what this is
also remember that not closed isn’t the same as open!!
We first prove if F is not closed or not bounded, then it's not compact. If $F$ is not bounded, consider the open cover $(n-1,n+1)$. No finite collection of this contains $F$, thus $F$ is not compact. Let $F$ not be closed, there then exists a limit point of $F$ not in it. Let this limit point be $q$. Then let an open cover of $F$ be the interval of the smallest eps neigbourhood containing all of $F \cup ( \frac{1}{n}, \frac{n \cdot t}{n+1})$
wai
We first prove if F is not closed or not bounded, then it's not compact. If $F$ is not bounded, consider the open cover $(n-1,n+1)$. No finite collection of this contains $F$, thus $F$ is not compact. Let $F$ not be closed, there then exists a limit point of $F$ not in it. Let this limit point be $q$. Then let an open cover of $F$ be the interval of the smallest eps neigbourhood containing all of $F$ \cup ( \frac{1}{n}, \frac{n \cdot t}{n+1})$
```Compilation error:```! Missing $ inserted.
<inserted text>
$
l.1422 ...neigbourhood containing all of $F$ \cup
( \frac{1}{n}, \frac{n \c...
I've inserted a begin-math/end-math symbol since I think
you left one out. Proceed, with fingers crossed.
Preview: Tightpage -1310720 -1310720 1310720 1310720
[1{/usr/local/texlive/2023/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}]
(./796939110815629322.aux)```
The second part is very badly worded
yeah I can’t quite tell what you’re trying to say
We define $F$ to be the smallest $\varepsilon-$ neigbourhood containing all of $F$.Let this be $F'$. We then define an open subcover $G$ to be ${S \mid S = F'\cup ( \frac{1}{n}, \frac{n \cdot t}{n+1} )}$
wai
where n \in \Z \setminus {0}
Is this better?
We define $F$ to be the smallest $\varepsilon-$ neigbourhood containing all of $F$.Let this be $F'$. We then define an open subcover $G$ to be ${S \mid S = F'\cup ( \frac{1}{n}, \frac{n \cdot t}{n+1} )}$
wai
I don’t understand how you’re defining F again
Isn’t F a subset of R
$F'$ is the smallest neigbourhood containing all of $F$
wai
and $t$ is a limit point of $F$ not in it
wai
so we define an open subcover of $F$, to be $G = {S \mid S = F' \cup (\frac{1}{n},\frac{n \cdot t}{n+1}); n \in \Z \setminus{0}$
wai
read this as smallest open set containing all of F
Does it make more sense now?
does that exist
btw your proof is suffering from a lack of paragraphs and textual structure
writing everything in a single paragraph is a good way to lose your reader
I'll re-write it properly
have some mercy on them
anyway
right now you're trying to prove that a non-closed F has an open cover w/o a finite subcover, yes?
yes
ok
so you say that F has a limit point outside itself
and you named it... t, by the looks of it
do you want nudges towards the right construction or would you like me to just give it to you
nudges please
you dont know how F is shaped around t or for that matter anywhere else. so the opens in your construction would want to be "big" somehow in order to be sure to cover F
i say big in a decidedly informal sense
So I need to construct an open set containing ideally all but an epsilon neigbourhood of t
you're thinking in the right direction here yes
i will also advise against trying to write it in interval notation
I was thinking of writing it as a set difference of R and a closed set
easiest to write it in setbuilder notation
also has the bonus that itll generalize to R^d
cause the cover that you gave for unbounded => not compact is also generalizable
${x \mid \exists \varepsilon : V_{\varepsilon}(x) \var \cap {t} = \varnothing}$
wai
Ann
Ann
I meant to type varepslion earlier on, must have not removed that
${x \mid \exists \varepsilon : V_{\varepsilon}(x) \cap {t} = \varnothing}$
wai
taken at face value, the set you've just described is R \ {t}.
which does not do us much good.
lemme try a bit harder
remember you want to describe a COLLECTION OF SETS, not merely one set.
perhaps parameterized by something.
Parameterised by t
npoe
nope*
t is fixed
it's a point that is a limit pt of F but doesn't lie in F
i say "trying hard" may lead you to breaking your own back
so think simple
yes think simple
A part of the open cover can be the sets of the form (t-n-1, t-n) and (t+n,t+n+1) , where n in in N
Then we have to find another open cover in [t-1,t+1]
hmm?
here is something to help you remove one of the layers of it
(a, +∞) is an open set
so is (-∞, a)
for any real a
yes
think about your "all but an epsilon nbhd of t" again
as t is a limit point, every eps neighbourhood intersects F at some point
every epsilon nbhd of t intersects F at some point, yes
that's gonna be important later
in that case we can't construct an eps neigbourhood around t, can we?
when you say "can't" do you mean "unable" or "unhelpful"
unable
well, especially if it's sandwiched b/w two parts of F
Could I have the construction please, or should I think about this a while longer?
eh let me spare you the misery
the collection of opens that i was specifically thinking of is something like: $$E_{\ep}(t) := { x \in \bR : |x-t| > \ep}$$ with $\ep > 0$
Ann
E stands for exterior
but don't think too hard about that
if you want your collection to be countable you can take only E_{1/n}(t) into your cover
Eh, that's fine
$\bigcup_{\ep>0} E_{\ep}(t) = \bR \setminus {t}$
Ann
and try to think about what happens if you take the intersection of some finite subcollection of these "exterior-ball" sets
We get a subset of the exterior of t
this is so simple . 😔 Should have been able to think of this
RA is not a good place to learn to cook up such simple constructions
wait, why is this false
tbh I've never had to do this before
atleast not that I can recall
you're taking the word "exterior" too seriously
We get a subset of R\ {t}
i mean, no shit.
im gonna say you need to actually sit down and write out what happens if we take a finite subcover of my cover.
okay, I'm lost
ok so consider the subcover consisting of $E_{\ep_1}, E_{\ep_2}, \dots, E_{\ep_n}$ (dropping the $(t)$ from each one cause i cbf to write it), and let's also say $\ep_1 > \ep_2 > \dots > \ep_n$ for convenience.
Ann
what's the union of just these guys
E_{\eps_n}
ok and what can you say about E_{ε_n}
keeping in mind your goal of showing that my open cover does not admit a finite subcover
it consists of all numbers more than eps_n+t and less than -eps+t
technically correct but misses the point
it doesn't cover all of the subcover?
words ouch
every finite subcover misses out some point of the open cover
simpler tbh
$F$ has nonempty intersection with the $\ep_n$-neighborhood of $t$, so it has at least one point lying in $V_{\ep_n}(t)$ and thus outside $E_{\ep_n}(t)$. thus $F \nsubseteq E_{\ep_n}(t)$.
Ann
Closed by @twilit field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got halfway through and got undefined so imma restart getting help 😓
$F\left(x,y,z\right)=xz \vec i+x \vec j+y \vec k$
smeagol
$S \to y=\sqrt{9-x^{2}-z^{2}}$
smeagol
$a(r,\theta) = r \cos(\theta) \hat i + \sqrt{9-r^2} \hat j + r \sin(\theta) \hat k$
smeagol
smeagol
$a_r = \cos {\theta} \hat i - \frac{r}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} \hat j + \sin{\theta} \hat k$
$a_\theta = -rsin(\theta) \hat i + 0 \hat j + r \cos{\theta} \hat k$
smeagol
You forgot the square root
smeagol
thank you!
so the cross product is
$n = \frac{r^2 cos \theta}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} \hat i - ( - r \sin^2 \theta - r cos^2 \theta) \hat j + \frac{r^2 \sin \theta}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} \hat k$
smeagol
$n = \frac{r^2 cos \theta}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} \hat i + r \hat j + \frac{r^2 \sin \theta}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} \hat k$
smeagol
does this look ok so far?
,w (cos(theta), -r/sqrt(9-r^2), sin(theta)) x (-rsin(theta),0,rcos(theta))
Should be right so far.
Yes, that's why I said it's right so far.
yeah
next I need to make n a unit vector and divide it by it's magnitude?
$|n| = \sqrt{ \frac{r^4 \cos^2 \theta}{9-r^2} + r^2 + \frac{r^4 \sin^2 \theta}{9-r^2}}$
If I recall correctly we didn't have to...
smeagol
Yeah exactly
What are the bounds btw?
r goes from 0 to 3
theta goes from 0 to 2pi
Ok nice!
$F(a(r,\theta)) = r^2 \cos(\theta) \sin(\theta) \hat i + r \cos\theta \hat j + \sqrt{9-r^2} \hat k$
smeagol
Looks good.
that dotted with n is
,w (r^2cos(theta)sin(theta), rcos(theta), sqrt(9-r^2)) . (r^2cos(theta)/sqrt(9-r^2),r,r^2sin(theta)/sqrt(9-r^2))
wth
$\frac{ r^4 cos^2 \theta \sin \theta}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} + r^2 \cos \theta + r^2 \sin \theta$
smeagol
looks the same
yea
in fact the bulky had nothing to do with the request 
computer brain fat
The left term integral seems painful.
$\int^{2\pi}_0 \int^3_0 ( \frac{r^5 \cos^2 \theta \sin \theta}{\sqrt{9-r^2}} + r^3 \cos\theta + r^3 \sin \theta ) drd\theta$
\int_{0}^{2\pi}
smeagol
I think for the left term integral wrt r I would do || u = 9-r² ||
The other terms r^3(cos(theta)+sin(theta)) should be 0
because you integrate them over [0,2\pi)
gotcha
Probably because of r=3 division by 3, I suppose
ok now it's not so angry
I took care of the r^3costheta and r^3 sin theta
why solve the r side when all the cos sin are 0 heh
