#graduate-applications
1 messages · Page 14 of 1
I'm at OSU so can you elaborate lol
I heard somewhere that 10 years ago OSU had domestic mgre median of 67 percent vs international 95. could totally be making this up
Dang, I need to catch up to the international students
Doesn't it help a fair amount though?
you cant guarantee admission tho
Since the advisor could let the grad committee know in advance that they're interested in said student
Yeah true, but it can help by a strong degree presumably?
the aforementioned "spoken pact" would never happen unless the professor happened to have insane power
that being said my advisor did say that in case i didnt get into my safety, he had the ability to make some phone calls...
maybe it does happen lol
Great school. Grad students there can also take grad classes at Rutgers and do research at both universities. Good choice
Are 6 schools too little for PhD apps for an international applicant... I couldn't find a lot of ppl doing the specific thing I want to do. The schools are Northwestern, UIC, Madison-Wisc, Uni of Chicago, UT Austin, U Toronto...
Ig ppl can't say much without knowing my personal background but ig I wanna ask if these schools are super competitive enough that I should definitely apply to more
I'm interested in measured group theory if anybody has suggestions...
6 probably is less imo, PhD apps are quite competitive so I would recommend to add couple more atleast to be on the safer side especially as an international.
What sounds like a good number... 10.. or is it more like 15
I am applying to 10 as an international too.
8-12 should be ok if you got above average profile
Main thing is your research experience and sop, make sure to write a stellar sop, linking your past experiences to future of what you want to do.
Ah I see, thanks
This is about your school selection and profile strength. I think you need to be a bit more than above average to feel safe applying to the 6 schools @knotty marsh mentioned.
What in your opinion, would qualify as bit more than above average btw
there is no way to actually say this. The point is these are all top 20 schools except for UIC. They are very competitive programs.
OSU doesn't even accept the GRE or MGRE for math anymore
progress is made
Hoping that my GRE waiver gets accepted so that I can give the MGRE with a day's worth of prep
you have to be cracked just so you get the opportunity to pay a uni 200k 😭
are international students paying for PhDs in the US?
I was under the impression they're still being paid
o I thought it was referring to Masters
oh well 90% of US masters programs are scams
you should not pay for a masters in the US
in the UK or other countries where it's not ridiculously expensive then yes go for it
this is also why if you're a us student looking for a masters go somewhere where the unis are not for profit moneymaking scams (IE, another country)
yeah if it's worth anything, if i do masters at my current uni (EU), i can do my final year at a us college for free lol seems better than paying 200k, though i presume just being an intl student doesn't make it worth much
definitely better than paying 200k. Expensive US masters programs are often not that prestigious anyway despite their cost
the most prestigious math unis in the US have all closed their masters programs to outside applicants with the exception of allowing PhD students to get masters along the way
outside like out of the uni.. or the country
the uni
outside of the uni
most of the places in the US that still have masters open to other students are just running expensive programs to fund their phd programs. Which means 1] they dont really care about their students getting the best education 2] they just aren't really very much more prestigious than a bachelors from a good uni anyway (at least for the purpose of PhD apps)
If I do a year abroad, hopefully i get nominated, my uni has a very strong program with UCs, so I'd aim for UCLA/UC Berkely I wonder what their math reputation is
Hmm but would they not allow an exchange student
they take exchange students for undergrad
ah I see
o nice
how do us math students do a phd after 4 year bachelor with gen eds, and on avg starting courses later than european students, are we europeans just dumb
Plenty of students take 5 years
I mean 5 years for phd
ah
and they do that thingy where they take courses during their first 2 years of their phd
and that's supposedly their "masters"
Yes exactly - actually both things are true
plenty of bachelors take 5 years
and plenty of phds take 5 years
Also its not the case that everything you learned in your bs+ms is necessary for doing a good phd.
do they get paid while taking those courses as a phd student ?
So people with less preparation are able to catch up and do a food phd
Also, one type of "MS" that is increasingly common + less of a scam is undergrads who get to take a 5th year at their undergrad uni to do an internal masters program marketed as an extra year for undergrads
Yes but you typically have some amount of teaching youre required to do to earn your funding.
and this is basically just "take more grad classes and write a thesis"
but usually it doesn't cost extra beyond the cost of an extra year of undergrad tuition
I'm applying to some masters programs but only ones in Europe because those are legit (cambridge part 3, eth zurich, maybe ill apply to some others)
in the US I'm just applying to PhDs
from what I’ve seen, many American math students don’t take analysis until their third year. Then, going straight into a PhD after only a bachelor’s degree seems intense, when you consider that European students typically cover analysis in their first year and complete a full five-year program—both a bachelor’s and a master’s—before pursuing a PhD
good luck, i'm also aiming for eth zurich
though not in a while
thanks
there's a really wide variety in the us
It works out just fine for many people
here at berkeley it is relatively common for people to take algebra + analysis first or second year
I think it's common at most of the top math ug programs
Also most students at top phd programs took analysis and other foundational courses earlier
I took algebra + analysis sophomore year and I was quite delayed bc of some external factors
there are many students who take exclusively grad classes starting sophomore year
wow
but it really depends where you go for undergrad
yeah americans are crazy, some take analysis in their third year, others do multi variable, linear algebra all that in hs as dual enrollment
There is a freshman I'm friends with who is carrying me in 3 of the grad classes that I'm in and is in a 4th grad class I'm not in
first semester freshman
so like
wow
you get a very large variety of different students
Is it surprising that some people have very different background, interests and ability?
For sure
Here in europe
it's very rare even at a top uni
for students to have done mvc linear algebra in hs
I would say that the american system is on average slower but the peaks and prodigies are also very accelerated
it's a very fend for yourself system
and so the people who are already really smart can be like years and years ahead of average students
In what sense
Yeah I would've liked a dual enrollment equivalent here in Europe when i was in HS but definitely don't want US higher ed lol
in the sense that most high schools only offer like calc 1 at the most, and it's the people who's parents are putting them in russian school of math since grade 3 who are going to be ahead
in the sense that public math education is terrible but for people who know where to look there are many good expensive private resources
in the sense that every aspect of american society is like extremely advantageous to those with the money/time/effort to get their kids ahead and extremely disadvantageous to those relying on our shitty defunded public school systems
and ofc im not claiming that the prodigies aren't already super smart. But even they would probably agree most of the school resources alone are not enough to challenge them for math and they have to look externally for other challenges
so the people who are willing/able to do that get a lot ahead and others dont
I guess I can't fairly say that europe/other countries are any better since I've never lived there
Europe differs quite a bit from country to country but from what i've seen, in HS prodigies aren't given that much opportunity compared to many in the US to further pursue their ambitions, but there is a greater effort to bring up the "average"
yeah that's kinda what I thought
but one important thing to mention is that at least for a lot of european countries, it's disingenous to compare Highschool abilities (to US) because of different systems, in the sense that for example in my country, those who were significantly lacking in academics typically went another route than highschool after middle school, bringing up the average "high school" ability significantly since the sample is filtered
oh that's interesting
There is a full government system to offer students an alternative to high school after middle school which from what i've noticed isn't as prevalent in US
so the end result is the average "high schooler" is really smart compared to americans but that's because they've been filtered
yeah interesting
where do people go other than high school?
I remember in my intro german language class I heard abt smt similar in germany (where there are like 3 "types" of high schools based on proficiency and more focused towards what ppl do with their lives)
my friend for instance is doing a mechanic apprenticeship instead of HS
but I don't remember the details
Vocational training generally
that's interesting
my only thought is that like specializing in something like that without doing high school so early seems like it closes a lot of doors for people before they're really mature enough to know what they want to do with their lives
There's also different types of universities, there is university of applied sciences, and normal universities, it's not really comparable to community college vs public college, it's more so a more practical/hands on approach vs more theoretical/research oriented
there is some opportunity to change your mind, for instance in switzerland if you go to a university of applied sciences and get say a 5.0/6 GPA, then you can apply for masters at a normal uni, ethz etc.
So you go back into the more academic path, and the university will usually have you take a few extra courses to catch up
ah that's cool
I have to take 2 more general Eds to graduate and not be PhD rescinded
i don't know if it's the same in US but i'm going to do what i call the "foreign lang" trick
to get by my non math mandatory classes
what is the foreign language truck
Basically taking intro classes in foreign languages that i already know
so I just don't ever work or show up for the class
and then just show up for the exam and get the credit + perfect grade
we have a separate language requirement that you can test out of
doesnt count towards gen eds
i still havent taken a science class
I had no clue the mGRE asked about artinian rings
in case anyone compiles resources for this stuff, maybe add an aside on determining when a quotient of a polynomial ring is artinian by inspection
Lmfao that’s insanely cursed
Wtf 
Please contribute to the cause of abolishing gre by not taking it 😭
the gre is an equalizer for a lot of people from schools without strong math background
thats about the only thing its good for
The GRE admins are also insanely slow in processing fee waivers
I need this by next Wednesday☠️
Call me crazy but I think this is intentional
They’re trying hard to fuck over low income students so they just give in and buy it
Fundamentally evil company
obligatory "i dislike minnesota" because they wont give me a fee waiver for being poor
dislike meaning i just wont apply 😞
They don't give application waivers??
only if youre part of one of those programs
UC Davis application fee is 135 bucks☠️
none of which i knew existed until this month
hell i didnt even know the goldwater scholarship existed apparently thats a big one. didnt know i shouldve looked out for this
Typical UC application fee
I should luckily qualify for a waiver
Wish I could, but the advice I've received on good authority is that it can matter when applying as an international
it's not on most mGRE resources (e.g. Princeton Review, Coley's notes, MathSub's topic list)
although the mGRE does ask about ideals, getting into ascending and descending chain conditions seems more like commutative algebra, which I do not think is taught at the undergraduate usually
Some schools ask you not to send it, not required for most anyways... I don't think grad committees get any valuable information (on how likely you are to succeed at their program) from mGRE tho, I think most mathematicians realise that...
does that hold for international applicants as well?
I've heard from some that have and still do serve on admissions committees that in that case they do look at it if possible, and use it as a factor in the decision process
I am aware some schools outright don't ask for them, but it's hard to buy that where it's optional they don't bother much with it
Ig they do... but the time you put in to get a 90 percentile could be better used to do some good math
Offset the cost
makes sense
maybe noetherian rings is on the list? idk I only studied calculus
I haven't seen the chain condition anywhere, and in general the discussion of ideals in most materials related to the mGRE seems limited to the definition and basic consequences
i think it's safe to say that no material knows exactly what is on the exam, since they make it harder every year
indeed
the PR book doesn't discuss fluxes, for instance, but flux questions pop up often
What are some good PhD programs that offer Applied Math or CS+Math? I'm aware UChicago recently has made a CS+Math grad program
from what ik cornell, mit, harvard, princeton offer applied math programs where you can work with people in cs. Also, CMU and GaTech ACO program.
It may help if you can be more specific by what you mean by "CS +Math"
Like algorithms and complexity?
Optimization in the vein of analysis and pdes / odes?
Combinatorial optimization?
Programming languages / compilers?
I agree with symmetry enjoyer. mGRE is just a standardized test for undegraduate math curriculum which would be given a small weightage, if any. I think its more important to have research experience.
for swiss mainly grades
💀
Is it a well known university?
Ah ok
Its well known
I thought lund gave grades, one of my friend also studies math there
Idk for sure, will ask him
I do agree with you two in that research exp. should matter more - I took it primarily at the suggestion of my research supervisor
it boils down to how selective the system gets for international applicants, I guess
In this case mgre is pretty important for you
This is exactly the type of thing mgre is supposed to be about - telling apart ppl from unis with weird grading schemes or less reputable coursework
So it’s pretty important for u to get a decent one
Oh
Mb
Ignore
I mixed up the comments
I remember an earlier conversation was someone asking how important mgre is
And I thought it was you
For ETH at least, not only the grades and thesis topic are important, but LoRs are great boosts to your application as well. A strong LoR from an experienced prof or someone who collaborated with ETH profs is better for your application. They are very interested in whether your interests overlap with any specific research groups at ETH
gre is optional for ethz. you might wanna attempt it if you want to apply to other places that need it, but its fine if theres no gre score attached to the application
should i have as wide a variety of undergrad classes as possible or be somewhat specialized
like im not gonna end up taking any advanced odes/pdes at all with my current plan, or an advanced linear algebra course (although the upper level abstract algebra one just covers a lot of that in the end of the year im pretty sure)
i have an intro linear algebra and intro odes course but its like the ones most stem majors would take
Skipping ODEs/PDEs is pretty common but skipping advanced linear algebra is questionable
It’s extremely important for almost every field of math
yeah that was my worry, but the grad level algebra class said you can take 443 (the end of the advanced undergrad/early grad algebra sequence) or advanced linear algebra as a prereq, so i thought there might be some overlap
Although, if your abstract class is advanced enough you may do enough module theory to generalize the non calculation based part
yeah we're doing stuff with modules next term
But that module theory is gonna be a lot harder if you’ve never seen much proof based linear algebra
And if you don’t do that much of it
Then you prob are still missing stuff
ive done proof based linear algebra it was just on the intro topics though
wasnt much computational in the class
You may be fine then
it was a 1 quarter long thing not semester
my other intro algebra class did some stuff with vector spaces when we learned about field extensions as well but im not sure if thats super relevant
in this book https://math.umd.edu/~jcohen/402/Pinter Algebra.pdf
Some common and important things to remember are like vector spaces (things like rank nullity, proofs using dimension counting, change of basis, the isomorphism of any FDVS with R^n, other random stuff), dual spaces (dual basis, the canonical isomorphism of V with its double dual, duality proofs), inner product spaces (abstract inner products, angles in abstract vector spaces, the groups of orthogonal/unitary matrices)
Eventually knowing stuff about tensors is important too but that will prob be in the abstract algebra class rather than the linear class
this is the stuff we did, we didnt do every single exercise but these topics
in the algebra class
my intro linalg wasnt all of this, it was a bit of computational at the start for 3-4 weeks (for row reduction stuff) then mostly proofs
was probably like, A,B,C,D,E
just not with these examples
we didnt do like isomorphisms and stuff in the intro linalg
This is missing some stuff I would say is reasonably important
Like dual spaces, inner product spaces
Other than that it’s prob ok
ok, that sounds good
i think ill be able to prepare enough learning those during winter break before we do stuff with modules
and skipping odes should be fine?
the intro diffeq class im doing feels like it's doing stuff with linear algebra and hiding it idk why
like my professor doesnt want to use the word vector or something
are there any big topics i should make sure not to miss? i dont think im going to really be doing any probability/stats or optimization
im worried not taking stats would be bad
i didnt take it in high school so i just dont really have any experience at all with it, not even an intro class
I dont think it will matter for grad school admissions if you're not doing anything applied or related to probability/optimization. But, I think its a good idea to take probability.
Yeah easily
Yeah it definitely is lol
Probably your prof doesn’t want to scare the engineering majors
How bad is the MGRE with zero practice?
Just got the fee waiver approved and I'm essentially going to run to the testing center right after a midterm if I do register
depends on how well you know the material...
ik some people that did well without studying. some people that didnt with plenty of studying. it depends on you.
For me personally pretty rough
But just take it do as well as you can
No use stressing now
I wasn't planning on giving it anyway given my lack of prep. My rationale being that if I do well then it helps me other I'm not going to send the score out
It sucks that they onlt offer exams for six weeks in total every year
Yeah
But overall just do your best
Most important thing is to be relaxed going into it
Turns out I can't even register so I guess I'm not going to take it
yeah you need to register like 3 weeks in advance minimum
Ah, onwards it is
Gatech international applicant. Do I need to do the credential evaluation thing?
To accelerate this required part of our process, we highly recommend that you order a credential evaluation from one of our service partners prior to submitting your application. Our partnership with these services offers our applicants a reduced price for an evaluation.
If you decide to submit your application without a credential evaluation, you may be selected to have your credentials evaluated by one of our service partners at a later time.
anyone here applying for ndseg
are you planning on doing omscs
What is a omscs
I checked, and no.
regular phd in math
I got a letter today "certificate of admission" how early do ppl get this? Is this something non official? I applied for spring 2025 ms program. Lastly, can't believe this yet, is this really saying that I'm accepted into the program?
well if it's for spring presumably you'd be expecting it around now I suppose
Read the letter and see if it means you’re accepted into the program
Congrats!
congrats king
is a W in a non-math class going to hurt graduate applications too much? or not really at all if i do well in all my math classes and have lots of other experience outside of classes
withdrawal
No it won’t matter
ok great ty
Ik people that have failed non math classes and got into top math phds
hi, not really looking for advice today but it's PhD app season and I am not happy 
My situation rn:
Applying for PhD's while juggling final year courses and thesis work 
Good luck everyone!
information theory
It’s brutal
I’m not doing a thesis but I am teaching
And I’m actually dying
Hey
im teaching and doing a thesis on top of 3 grad classes its so cooked
math applicants are built diff
echoing a convo in a grad chat:
is admissions somewhat stochastic, I feel like among my older friends some of them took a year or two before they got in somewhere and some of them got several acceptances out of undergrad and it often feels like there's no correlation between how "impressive" their position was vs how quickly they got accepted
there is some randomness to it, it's very hard to tell based on paper who would be a good fit and who isn't. I'm sure that committees are already trying to do the best they can, and even then, lots of students drop out
impressiveness has nothing to do with it
if you are like - on track to cure cancer
and your target program has a bunch of algebraic geometry profs - they dont care
if a professor can see themselves producing useful work with a student for 5-7 years and spending nearly 50-100k on you per year (of funny money), then they will say yes
the conditions for them to see that isn't necessarily what your impression of "a good application" is
I have neither a thesis nor grad classes nor teaching duties for my BS 
ok well I might have a thesis but it reads like a joke
I literally never submitted my undergrad thesis
Dw I have no thesis also
everyone ive spoken to has just told me, better hope the admissions committee has people that know your letter writers personally
yea that sounds right
I am cooked for this reason as an international applicant
thats probably one reason why you only ever see absolutely cracked international math grad students
This is just not true
this is an exagerration
well, its the difference between having a 1% chance and a 10% chance, its quite significant
Im not sure about that.
I think it helps if your letter writers are known but i dont think they have to know them personally.
obviously if people know your letter writer personally they may take the letter more seriously.
are you applying in usa
it is very unlikely
forget the word "very unlikey"
i just tried to search for something similar and i couldn't find any such thing
imo u should not worry about it
especially that ur applying in the usa
i think tho this may lead to some "administrative" problems with names and stuff that i do not know of
which should be fixed and should be fine
idk if u are an int student
there are some things that have to match when ur applying for a visa/study permit
etc
lots of things
but as far as "ur rejected cuz .." no
Nah I'm a US student my current university has a system for like preferred names
then ur golden! good luck with apps
Thank you!
the name a trans person used to go by
is caltech a good universitiy for grad school? I heard it is rlly cracked but small
I think it draws a certain type of student
But if the faculty are a match for your research interests, then yes it is highly regarded
it is really good if you know exactly what you want to research
so if someones unsure they should apply somewhere larger
Yes, if you're unsure of your mathematical interests it is generally recommended to apply to larger institutions
plenty of fantastic schools that are larger schools
UCLA, Berkeley, Minnesota, UMich, GTech, Washington, Wisconsin, Rutgers, I'll be biased and throw on OSU
100% go for a larger school if you aren't deadset on a particular area
One benefit of being here at OSU is that not only are there people doing algebraic combinatorics but there's actually 4 people and they all do different things
if you can find a school in a similar setup, with multiple people who do things you're interested in
that seems ideal
This will not cause an issue (speaking partially from experience). You can also specify your identity to the schools and just say your letters are under a different name because of this (your call)
However I would check in with people (perhaps former students) that the people you’re applying to be advised by aren’t horribly transphobic. Just make sure
Sorry if off-topic (nothing else seemed like a better fit) but any adjacent channels here for job posts? Hiring students/recent grads with math backgrounds
none specifically for that, feel free to discuss math career-related topics in e.g. #advanced-lounge or the graduate lounge channel if you gain access
Anyone here at eth zurich
I'm considering graduating a year early and getting a master's degree outside of the country before applying to a phd program because of the current politcal climate in the usa, would it be a big issue to lose complex analysis and differential geometry? Here are my 2 possible course plan projections. I'd also be dropping the CS minor if i want to graduate a year earlier
would i be unprepared for trying to start a phd with just the3-year plan (the one on the left?)
that's why i was considering trying to get a master's after that if i go for that
Hmmmm
It seems like you'll have hit most of the expected undergrad topics expect for complex analysis
But
A lot of people doing phds are entering the phd with grad courses already taken
depends on the quality of your undergrad institution and how admissions will view it
Also depends on what sort of research you want to do
that's why i was considering going for a master's first
it's really hard with only 3 years worth of classes, and a european masters will really help
i was thinking of a european masters then applying to a phd program at university of tokyo, since i'd be able to get a recommendation from somebody who knows the professor i'd want to work with there
and i feel like that would probably help my chances quite a bit
does Tokyo do advisor based admission
im not sure, i was planning on looking into it more
grad courses as in the ones you take to prepare for quals?
or the ones after quals
Both
courses at the level of graduate study as per the US system
all the 400 level ones on that list cover the topics that are on quals. they're mixed grad/undergrad classes at my school and typically undergrads only take one of them
does your school do undergrad based quals
When people mention European masters, do they include the UK usually or no?
Yes
i don't think so, since undergrads would only be taking one of those sequences typically and the grad students usually take a few to prepare for quals
some schools do quals based on undergrad material, mine does it solely on material not expected to be covered in an undergrad curriculum
it's confusing since both undergrads and grads take those classes
so im not really sure
Asking since I was initially planning on masters programs in the US but given that funding is bad I'm applying straight to PhD
it's just typically meant as like the "final" undergrad class you would take in 4th year or something
but im not sure
one way to determine this is like, do you guys start with measure theory in analysis, etc
then your schedule looks fine
well now I'm slightly confused
what is the 400 vs 600 level algebra
oh, measure theory isn't done until the 2nd quarter of the analysis sequence i just realized, does that change things?
it's probably school dependent
maybe your first quarter is a review of undergrad analysis like baby rudin
yeah it seems like it
at my institution it's straight into measure theory then functional then complex
a little bit of other stuff ig?
that seems like a standard undergrad analyis course
this is the first quarter so that makes sense
2nd/3rd is this less than what a grad analysis would typically be though i'm guessing?
just the lebesgue measure seems like a soft introduction
these are the different grad analysis classes
i guess your school has plenty of courses
i was considering doing one of these in my 4th year if i have time
but i think id probably wanna do the algebra one instead
https://web.pdx.edu/~veerman/0_mainfile.pdf this is what the number theory would cover, is this more like undergrad or graduate (if it covers the entire book, i think maybe skipping first couple chapters)
idk I don't know any number theory 
then it's grad level proba
would i be alright with the real analysis class not going super in-depth in measure theory then if my number theory class covers it more?
it seems like this is covered
that's msr theory that can be applied to dynamics
thats unfortunate
and only that
so definitely less than what i should know im guessing
Do you know what area of math you want to do for phd?
i'm not entirely sure, it's still my 2nd year
i did an reu in origami math which was a lot of combinatorics/graph theory and it was fun
i was trying to have as much variety as possible during undergrad
Unfortunately origami math does not have that much to do
And would not be a viable phd
why not? i havent done a lot but it seems like theres a lot of open problems in it
is it just because of it being uncommon?
since then professors wouldnt really want to advise that
if i know of a professor who would want to does that solve the issue, or would it still be a bad idea? i'm not really decided on it anyways, since i'd like to learn more about other topics first
Generally you want multiple potential advisors at an institution
that makes sense
i'm not sure exactly what topic i'd want to do still, i've been enjoying algebra so far but havent really done anything specialized enough do know if i'd wanna do research with that
as a second year you're not expected to know more than the most general sense of roughly what you want to do
if i'd be planning to graduate after my 3rd year though, i feel like i should probably know more what i want to do
but if i do a masters first maybe not
a masters is usually recommended for us students if you're unable to take sufficient grad classes
So it's still good to have a general idea of the direction you want to go in
i think i'll see how this year goes then decide if i want to do the 4th year or not
i'd also be losing the cs minor if i do only 3 years
tbf the cs minor is only useful outside of academia
that's fair, would it be better to just learn programming on my own?
CS minor is not useful at all
just take what looks interesting
If you need to program just learn how to code on your own
i only happen to have a cs minor because I took enough cs classes on accident
is an mGRE of 650 too low to report?
What percentile?
44th
nope
nope
yeah
I'd say so?
been working on a complex analysis paper with a prof and some colleagues since the last year
Ok that sounds good
recently have been assisting on a paper in particle physics as the math guy of the group
Ummm if you're applying to schools that don't require the mgre, I would not submit it to them
If there are schools that require it, of course you need to submit it
four years of research experience, two years of TA experience
all of them just say optional
Ok don't submit then
I see
Do you have anything already published or is everything in various stages of draft
mostly drafts at the moment
the complex analysis work is the consequence of an REU
ah, alright
i couldnt find a career channel? maybe this is the right place to ask? i want to pursue higher studies and go for a masters in maths, im currently in an undergrad engineering degree. What are some good programs /unis in europe that i should be looking into and prepare myself for their application process. If you have suggestions outside europe that's welcome too.
A good place to start could be the ranking websites like THE, QS
Europe predominantly looks at grades I believe and to a good extent course requirements. So engg -> math may be hard in europe unless the programs explicitly allows engineers too. US should be better for something like applied math track.
But again, I am over generalizing a bunch of things. In the end, requirements vary from program to program so you gotta do the research specific to you.
you are definitely right
europe is much harder to get into if you are not a math major
(speaking from experience)
they basically just look at the courses you hvae taken and do a calcuation of credit hours
European science degree are much more math rigorous than usa
for one of the worst offenders see economics
in USA you cant even assume an econ major can take a derivative

Econ majors not knowing math go brrr
lowkey, quantitative economics should be the only valid econ major
followed by a rigorous year of game theory
I just took a look at the Oxford econ major and you can get by with only doing calculus in your first year
avg PPE grad not knowing math
this is the same for the US math degree tho
maybe so, but I'm more referring to the actual mathematical content in economics courses
Such as
oxford doesn't have an 'econ' major
yeah that is one of my concern, going from engg-> math. i dont wanna just take another bachelor's degree first 😭 and im more leaned towards pure maths than appl.
which makes things harder cuz applied would be prefered for an engg.
i've had a few semesters with maths, altho i dont know if pure math would be allowed but i think theyd allow a basic maths master not too specialised? i do see people switching to maths after engineering
but ig people easily get into applied maths programs since that is much needed for engineers
that's just my opinion idk what the scenario is
like which ones
had discrete maths, engineering maths, calc, differential equations
nah,that im studying on my own
How many grad courses should I realistically have taken by the end of my bachelor's to have a chance of getting into grad school at one of the top US university?
I realize it takes more than that, but I presume some amount of courses are almost necessary to even have a chance too
And another question, if I really want to do grad school at a really good US university and I don't get in this winter, would it be a stupid idea to do a year as a self-paying student at my university (outside of a degree, so after my bachelor but not in a master's program) so that I get a stronger application for the subsequent year's application where I would then hope to get in?
What do you mean by a top university
They vary a bit, top 20-ish in terms of all around math. The one I'm most interested in has probably the strongest department in the field that I'm interested in
I know someone at a nearby school who got into Boston University for math and I’m pretty sure she never did any grad courses
she did read a research paper for her senior thesis however
we took functional analysis and measure theory together but that was undergrad level
I know grad students at Berkeley who never took grad classes. I even talked to a grad student here who was an art major in undergrad
Yo, maybe I can get into Berkeley? There's still a chance
Welp. I mean, I've talked to quite a few undergrads at Berkeley - they all seem to be speedrunning the grad curriculum starting their 2nd year as an undergrad lmao
Berkeley is quite difficult to get in to
Berkeley math phd only very rarely accepts undergrads from Berkeley
Damn, didn't know that
Taking grad courses as a Berkeley undergrad is relatively easy
Do they favour anything in particular when choosing who to admit then?
True... sometimes
Agol's algtop fucked me up lol
"relatively easy" as in the department does not put up too many barriers
I’m in Givental’s right now lol
It’s kicking my ass
Yeah. The undergrads are insanely cracked honestly. the grad students are also cracked, but Berkeley PhD has a reputation for taking some math students with non traditional paths to math if they have shown a lot of recent growth
I’ve heard from an admissions panel that they care significantly more about trajectory than raw amt you’ve studied
The art student for example didn’t do any math first two years, but began learning it very fast their junior year
Another important thing I was wondering about: one of my quarter semesters end in january, will my grades for that quarter also be taken into consideration in the applications somehow?
You can submit your grades if desired
Ok, awesome
Do you think there'd be time to change judgement based on it though? I think the exams are like around the 20th of january
And I suppose emails for admissions are sent out around start february or smth, right?
Yes, most decisions are made between mid feb and mid march
Most acceptances are march onwards
Every school is a bit different about how organized the process is
It varies quite a bit, depending on how organized the professors on the grad admissions committee are
But is there always an option to sumbit the grades later on?
Well you usually directly email them I think
is it possible to indicate by any means that a class you took was actually graduate level (i.e. same examination, sat with grad students, etc.) if the university itself has marked it "Undergrad" due to state policy? (foreign applicant)
Usually in a graduate application, when you list your classes, there will be a place to list the textbook used so that can give an indication
There is also usually a section where you can apply oddities
If all else fails, then you can put it in your personal statement
thank you
90% of my reading is outside of any assigned book 
That's something to mention in your personal statement
we can mention additional readings there?
that's good to hear
You can talk about whatever you want in your personal statement
Ideally you talk about things that explain why you are well suited to math grad school
I would personally not do this
To me it would come off as at best desperate and at worst dishonest
But up to you
I see
the issue is that it's actually a graduate class in every aspect
right down to who we sat with in the lectures
The thing is let the admissions committee make that judgement
so in that case, is the primary means of judging courses just mentioning the textbooks and / or course contents if it's asked on the application?
Yes, but imo don’t spend too much time talking about your courses in your personal statement unless you really need to fill space
They have your course list and they have your resume, taking classes doesn’t tell them how you will do as a researcher
I see
Out of curiosity, how important is it to have some breadth in terms of the types of math one has taken courses on? Like, if I'm mainly interested in alg/top/geo and my courses reflect that heavily, is it important for me to make sure to get something like functional analysis on there too so that they can see that I am also still capable of the analytic side of things?...
I know someone who didn't take algebra and got into michigan
they were really heavy into diffgeo though
I see. So it really is much more depth than breadth
I'm just asking cause I'm currently having to choose between diffgeo and functional analysis
And the last analytic thing I did was in my second year, over 1.5 years ago now lol
there's no need to cover everything just because it seems like everyone else is doing it
except for, like, you better take the core undergrad classes
Yeah, ofc, done with those
Breadth is important as well
Ah fuck
you have to remember that functional is intended to be learned in a first year phd anyways
functional is not an undergrad course?
not usually
Not here either, but neither is diffgeo to be fair
unless your class uses something like kreyszig
real analysis and abstract algebra
that's it?
yeah that's the core of it. obviously you should be taking more
Hm... maybe I should do the functional analysis one then after all?? I do also know around half of the diffgeo material already, but idk if that's moreso a reason to take it or not so that I can get it on the transcript
functional is just good to know anyways
Also complex and linear. And then yeah you’re expected to take electives but it’s not rlly as important which ones
(Obviously the point of electives is they give you a chance to specialize more)
So I wouldn’t rlly say it’s like a bad system
yeah this is also true. the thing is my school doesn't offer a good complex undergrad class
it's a service class so I just took the grad one
Ah
Wait really? That sounds kind of fricked
this is true everywhere
at least in the US
it is very common for places to accept their undergrads at quite lower rates than other schools
the reasoning is that they want to promote people going elsewhere to get different experiences
(tho note: as someone going to berkeley for undergrad, I also am malding at this statistic so I'm not exactly defending it)
Yeah fair enough. I'm applying to my undergrad institution's MS program as a safety similarly
Though I think they're pretty lenient in accepting students to the program
Sadly Berkeley has no masters
I’m applying to some places in Europe but none I would really call safeties
Europe would be interesting to apply to but I feel like it's too big of a move right after undergrad
Also don't know if there MS programs are fully funded. I was looking at Utrecht and couldn't fin anything about MS funding
I believe Utrecht has some scholarships for the MS, but not a lot and even less for non-european students
I got admitted last year but they were unwilling/unable to make the funding situation work for me :/
They’re not. But it’s still reasonable from what I understand: eg it’s significantly less expensive than US undergrad
At least you are in a very beautiful city, all the photos of Utrecht I've seen look amazing.
well I ended up not going because I couldn't get funding
well I ended up not going because I couldn't get funding
What's an SOP really supposed to be... what does it tell about you... I've been thinking it's about my mathematical journey, and I've been talking about all the research and mathematical activities I've done over the past years
I wanna edit it a bit, but I need to understand what parameters to optimize for, if that makes sense
Stop using so many alarm words. And change your name to something other than just 'math'.
what even is bro writing
Got letters from one of my recommenders in
my first deadline is on 15th Nov so I gotta ask the other two profs to kindly work on it asap lol
Bump^
That sounds fine
Have you tried finding resources for writing a SOP online?
Ive looked at samples
I have one ready, but Im not sure how to optimize it, whats the commitee even looking for
Have the people writing your letters of rec read it
It should convey that you’ll succeed in graduate school and why you want to pursue a phd.
One of them, but he did not really give me any criticism, he just wanted it for context
How you do that is up to you and depends on your journey.
Hmm I see
there are 2 schools of thought for writing an sop
some professors dont care one bit about any sort of exposition, they just want to see you can write about and talk about math
My profile isn't that strong to write this thoroughly😭
It’s funny bc every good sample personal statement has literally 3 REUs
It’s such a bruh moment
yea it sucks ass for those of us who didn't get accepted into a single REU
I didn't even apply to any
I just ended up doing summer readings and research. Time to clutch up and finish my SOP today
this just means you can spend more time talking about the rsearch you are currently interested in
1000 words isnt a lot
Time to talk about game theory and AI😁
no literally
Do I need to spend $25 per school to send my mgre scores even though I used my free score sending options but I did it in spring so it doesn't show in the application portals?
no
what do I need to do then?
because they don't show up in the application portals as received
Lots of people (including me) got into good programs without REUs so don't let that discourage you
You dont need to have done REUs. You can replace the REU part with an opportunity you found very beneficial.
I just like the structure of the statement.
Well I’ve done an REU. Just not 3 like it seems everyone who gets in has done lol
Very few people have done 3 reus
Yet it seems that everyone with a sample statement of purpose online has lol
At that point why even post the statement of purpose if you’re already cracked it probably made no difference to your acceptance chances

Ignore me I’m just venting
As soon as you can lol
hi guys i am rohith from india
i am currently doing masters in usf and i want to transfer my college
would you recommend best one?
Typically summer before 3rd or 4th year.
Most programs wont except a first year
Some do. There are also specific programs geared towards first years.
You should apply despite the fact that you likely won’t get in
Worst case you get a little headstart on your essays for the year after
REUs don’t have hard and fast reqs usually
It’s mostly case by case
Np. Gl
Are you at a US university?
Yea thats very rare i think.
And i intl students may refer to non US citizens at US universities
This page contains a listing of the Research Experience for Undergraduates (REUs) aimed at mathematics students that will plan to run in the summer of 2025. We are compiling this list in spreadsheet format to make it easier for people to copy and sort through what they need to find.
Much of this
US REUs are largely funded by the NSF which has citizenship/residency requirements for participants
true. Though you should apply anyway. There were a number of UK students at my REU
reus will accept international students under the caveat that you wont get funding
true. The students at the REU I went to got funding from their home institution
so what does this have to do with #graduate-applications ?
I think it's a reasonable concern for students applying in america in the next 4 years
I mean honestly if you're in a blue state you're probably fine
but I would (and am) seriously reconsidering any applications in red states
I am already in grad school in a red state 💀
rip. I do think you'll probably be fine but I also think the people who were dismissing @ math as if it was a ridiculous concern were a bit unfair
after all, trump is a fascist who has repeatedly stressed his desire to put eg immigrants in camps
and to do vengeance on his political opponents (which is probably not random math students, but if he has that attitude it's likely there are many trump supporters who do too)
realistically I don’t think it’s something this channel can do anything about
sure. but discussing like "how should politics change where I decide to grad school" is a reasonable thing to put in this channel imo
are you guys fr lol? this aint the channel to be discussing the world politics
my point is that if politics impacts your grad school applications, its reasonable to discuss that impact in the grad school applications channel
grad school admissions will probably be funny this time around
I wrote a paper for my English class about how certain unfriendly legislation in red states has been causing a full-scale exodus of intelligence from red to blue
granted this is math and not humanities as in the subject of my paper
but it does affect a lot of faculty either way
so I imagine some states are going to get a lot more applicants than others
ultimately just guessing tho
fuck english classes btw, completely tanked my performance in all my classes and not just gpa
I took every single non math class I had to take at my school pass/fail
literally every single one
it was very nice bc I could put in 0 effort
and just coast
wow
so the strat is to apply to red school states?
That may be the move💀
Could you expand a bit on this? Interested in knowing what this entails
I mean I don’t really know I’ve only heard like rumors + a couple non traditional grad students I’ve talked to
All I know is like we have a bit of a reputation for taking risks on/admitting more non traditional PhD students than other unis
Such as for example motivated students from other majors
Or smaller schools
Ah makes sense. I fit none of those moulds so I hope I get lucky with the grad committee
I mean berkeley is a crazy competitive school and those people do probably have straight up worse chances than most math majors
it's just like
they have better chances relative to other crazy competitive schools
University of Utah has good reputation, and I really like the state.
what field do they specialize in?
they have a research grant in algebra/geoemtry/topology so a combination of those
maybe other fields, but those are the ones i'm interested in
They have very strong geometric group theorist(s)
(asking again) then what do I need to do?
anyone went from BS Computer Science -> MS Applied Mathematics (or even Pure)?
Should be possible assuming you have strong math background (bunch of courses) and the programs you apply for are holistic (like in the US)
iirc they're strong in Commutative Algebra
I took Calc I-III, Discrete, Intro to Linear Algebra, Linear Algebra, Abstract Algebra, and an Introductory Stats class.
Couldn’t take differential equations because of schedule conflict sadly.
And yeah lacking all other important math classes like real analysis.
I think pure math might be tough, but applied math might work depending upon area of research interest, past experience, etc
Lmao, that’s why im wondering whether I have the chance of getting TA/RA position if i do applied math
typically yes
TA and RA positions are stipend + tuition waiver
lol more like 5
So I am currently on a 30k / year stipend (before taxes) and I don't have to pay tuition
1 sec I actually have the data for this
wait when you say work
do you mean TAing or also coursework?
Ok I'll just answers both
I am lucky enough to be on fellowship so I don't have to be a TA
I spend ~36-37 hours a week on coursework + research (which currently only consists of reading while me and the advisor try to figure out a direction to pursue)
but yes I am very lucky to be in this position
My roommates have to be a TA and they spend around 10-20 hours a week on it
depending on if they have to grade exams and what not
lol no I'm just lucky
I don't think I'm particularly smarter or anything than the rest of my cohort
idk why I got a fellowship but I'm going to take advantage of it if at all possible
Some universities have fellowships
some advisors have grants to pay for students so they don't have to TA
you can get external NSF fellowships (very competititive)
you need a postbacc
Well I'm sure equivalent things exist in Europe lol
I am in the US and so that is what I know
nothing
which in particular means I know basically nothing
you need to fill out the self reported test score section
you should actually check the sites of the universities you're applying to to be sure
but most (again, not necessarily all) places have the policy of "self report your score, we'll ask for an official copy if we give you an offer and you accept it"
In a few universities in the US, you can land a TA or RA role (20 hrs/week, I believe) as a MS student; you qualify for a tuition waiver, and you also make a few $ that should help you cover room and other basic expenses.
budgeting is a good habit to get into
not just for grad school but for life
I've started using one in grad school and I wish I used one earlier in UG
being forced to track every dollar you spend makes you more at ease IMO
I'm being more mindful with how I spend my money and making sure it goes to things I actually enjoy (and conversely I have found that I actually have money to spend on the little things that make me happy)
finances are a very important aspect of grad school and a budget helps you manage that aspect
so how much do you spend on room, food, transport, idk health
many schools in the US do this
most give you a stipend and you have to TA. It is reasonably common for schools to give fellowships to first years.
You may benefit from a budget in the opposite way: you may find that you have some extra money to make your life a little cozier
I use a spreadsheet
Apps exist
Many things out there
some schools explicitly ask for officially send your scores
Yes my second sentence says that this is reasonably common.
i actually dont know how common it is. It probably isn't as common as I originally thought, but some of my friends went to schools where they give fellowships to first years so they dont have to teach.
As an undergrad, I'm spending about 200 on food, room is about 550-600 (at max) and health + transport covered by tuition on a per month basis
this depends on location moreso than you being an ug
I'm hoping it'll be the same in grad school assuming the school's in a similarly priced region (college town)
Yeah fair
dumb question, but are applied math courses seen as a negative when applying for a pure program?
I've got the usual pure courses done (real, func, comp, topo, groups, measure), but here undergrads aren't allowed to take more advanced pure courses
so my remaining slots are dominated by stuff like fluid mechanics or game theory or numerical methods
i dont think so as long as you have a solid pure math background.
they may not necessarily help compared to taking more advanced pure courses
I see
Also, are you expected to calculate major GPAs on your own when supplying it on an application?
I don't have those on any transcripts
you need to fill it out in case they dont know you even have a score
That's a very very rough estimate but it's probably a bit more ngl
I try to minimize eating out
A lb of chicken breast is 3-4 dollars so a kilo would be 6-7 at max
ah i see, seems like they are strong in algebra overall
i dont rly think so, i might go for pure math for grad school but im not even in any sort of a mathematics major
like as long as you do things on ur own, such as doing directed reading, it should be fine
No
i feel like it rly depends on state
oh absolutely
U live in an exceptionally cheap area of the US
True at least in terms of rent💀
Rent is a big part of it lol
yeah 600 a month is very cheap especially if ur in a single room
Of course I fill it out. But should I not also arrange ets to send the scores "officially"?
i thought you already sent them
Did you apply for one, or it was just granted to you?
I did, but I did it in spring and they don't show up.
It was just given by the university
random question: for those who have already been through this process--when in the year would yall say fly-ins start post-acceptances and what days of the week do they tend to fall on? are most of them over the weekend/monday/friday?
Would it still be worth applying to PhD programs even if I'm not finishing my master's next semester? The original plan was to finish my MA in Spring '25 but now that I'm dropping a course I won't be graduating till fall '25. I'm just not sure if I'm still a good candidate for a PhD program without a masters.
do you think its worth trying and spending the time and money?
if so, then try it. if not, then wait.
I think joining a masters program and leaving without a masters will hurt your application, but you may have a chance at some places.
In the most ideal world, I would stay at my current institution for the PhD, which means my credits would end up transferring into the PhD program anyway. Had I not missed the deadline for this year's application I might have been in the PhD program without having finished my master's.
the phd admission might be contingent on you finishing your masters
Hm
definitely aim to graduate with a masters, you can also use the additional time to e.g. meet potential advisors or try to do research
Personally, I feel like it would be a waste to come one semester from finishing the masters and just drop out, even if it would be dropping out for the purpose of getting a PhD
You’re close enough that you might as well finish it
If I stay at my current school I would get the master's degree while taking credits toward the PhD anyway, so that's why I am on the fence. But I see everyone's point. Perhaps taking a gap semester isn't the worst idea.
for me they were after I got accepted into places
and they were mostly over the weekend
maybe sometimes starting on a Friday or sometimes ending on a Monday
(so that you can sit in on a class or two)
make friends with profs for your courses your last semester
so that if needed you can move an exam or whatever
I had one class my last spring semester which had required attendance and I had to keep telling the prof "yea I'm visiting XYZ grad school I need to be excused this Friday"
thankfully they were understanding
also had to move an oral exam
again thankfully that other prof was understanding
I bet most of your classes your last semester will be math courses
and so you have the advantage that those profs also did grad school visits so hopefully they'll be understanding
Apparently UCSB requires the GRE General
How hard is the general GRE
can I just wing it without studying at all
I studied for the subject test a little already so I'm not too worried abt the math section
General GRE is easy
Well
I shouldn't say easy
But generally you don't need to study for it
Maybe study a bit for it so that you know what to expect, but it shouldn't be a problem really
ok sounds good
GRE General is like the SAT but easier
I'd say just skim the english section of Princeton Review because the MCQs tend to follow a set pattern
Trying to work on a research proposal for a scholarship application (NSERC-CGSM), and I'm kinda stuck on the "approach I'll take" part
Any recommendations for how I can make "First, figure out what most of this even means" sound professional?
you won't get near a perfect which is what most people in other disciplines aim for, but for just math admissions I highly doubt it matters that much
also a lot of vocab that you might not be familiar with
Alright bet. I mean the literal only school I’m applying to that needs it is UCSB
honestly I just said not applying to any such school
I love Santa Barbara though
It’s such a pretty campus
And a really pretty town
Decent topology faculty too
When I checked
So imma just wing it this weekend
And see how it goes
Anyone know of some solid funded MS programs?
Most of what I search are all gambles in terms of funding
Wake Forest has a funded MS program but only half of each cohort is funded
Thanks! I'll definitely consider applying there
its not common in math, you might also consider some postbacc programs
Fair but I'm not sure if I'd want to 'lose' a year by doing a postbacc
this isnt really losing a year, especially if you dont get into any programs you want
my uni's postbacc had someone from mit. apparently they were rejected from every program they applied to, reppalied the next year and got in almost everywhere
Do you mind if I DM about the postbacc program?
well, you can, but im not a participant myself nor do i know much other than it seems to be helpful
What’s your uni, if you don’t mind?
For those who need to hear this: do not hyperfixate on the worst possible outcomes, a lot of it is in your head and it's also completely unproductive... it's a stressful time for all of us, you're not alone💖.
yeah its just unnecessary stress
i mean a math phd is competitive but just work hard, do ur own research etc and thats enough to get into any phd program imo
Could someone help me figure out a list of universities with a good grad/phd research program for algebraic topology and low-dimensional topology?
UGA
it has david gay
also most canadian unis
are very strong in AT
uwo has rick jardine
ubc
Stony Brook has a good geometry department
yeah the simons center is prob one of the top in the world, a good place for theoretical physicists as well
Is the stipend sufficient to cover living there? I've heard that area is quite expensive
UM has a funded masters that transitions into the PhD program
Awesome, thanks for all of these!
Idk I only did ug there. But it's in Long Island, so not anywhere near the prices of Manhattan
ah, alright
Thanks!
Hi guys, I’m a physics student in Latin America but I’d like to pursue a career in mathematics; maybe specifically in mathematical physics or geometry but maybe not, idk
So now I’m thinking about where I should apply to for grad school. I also assume that a masters in math is best suited for me. Well, with this context I have two questions
It turns out that IMPA (Brazil) and italian universities could be an option for me, which one would be better in “mathematics in general”/mathematical physics/geometry?
Second question, can you guys make me aware of some funded masters in unis where mathematical physics is big (or geometry)? Because I’m totally lost, of course I know MIT, oxbridge, etc are very good but I’m not getting into those 
You can look towards Wake Forest which has a funded MS program
I looked at UFlorida and it also seems to have a funded MS program
Thank you 👍 Are those better than IMPA?
If anyone could answer my IMPA vs. italian unis, I’d be thankful
Hey, I'm a US student at a pretty well-ranked liberal arts school and I'm looking at masters programs in Canada, hopefully in differential geometry/ Lie Theory. I got into math pretty late in college - was doing forestry before - but did a summer of research, a thesis, and most of the offered higher level math classes. I haven't been able to figure out how competitive admissions are for international students to many of the top schools there (UBC, UofT, McGill, Calgary,etc) and was wondering if anyone had insight. Thanks!
They generally don't care about the general gre
Some care about the math gre
Some don't
they expect you to do well if you take the gen gre tho
ive heard some say they care ab verbal reasoning more than quantitative too
The verbal section is not hard though
I'm pretty sure it tests at a lower level than SAT english?
I'd look at a list of schools you're interested in applying to
and seeing what their requirements are
and make your decision based off that
Finalised the schools I'm applying and two thirds are reach schools💀
The only 'matches' are my current institution, NC State, Penn State, Wake Forest and UFlorida
All my schools are reach lol.
Well mainly because the area I want to work on is somewhat niche, so few people work on it or have dedicated track for it.
every school is a reach school 
I'm sure plenty of schools outside the top 100 will be ecstatic to take us all
Are Canadian masters programs more forgiving in terms of lower transcript grades?
yeah but things can get rough based on what you want to do later
holds true for PhD, even schools in 100-300 I have seen have only like 20-30% acceptance rates (well statistically ofc)
#advanced-lounge message @tulip rune as I was saying, they have two step selection. First they shortlist, I would get result by December 3rd week. If selected, there are on-site interviews. So it's actually quite a long process.
Their SOP length is bizarre, only 2500 characters
Did you accelarate your 4 year program and completed it in 3 years? Or did you gain additional credits which makes it equivalent to a 4 year program? For the former, it would be equivalent to a 4y bachelor, for the latter, it is not.
that's what i meant by acceleration, some do that, then its four year equivalent
but if you take additional courses for a 3 year degree such that you have more credits than needed (equivalent to a 4 year program), then its equivalent to only 3 years
its a subtle difference
well that's how uni would award things
if someone takes extra courses (more than 180 ECTS for a 3 year course) that's on them
if its a 4 year 240 ECTS degree that someone completes in 3 years (I am not sure if its even allowed, but let's just assume it is), then its still a 4 year degree equivalent
I keep hearing how important statements of purpose are when applying, Ive only heard from students though, does anyone with closer connections to the application process know how much they actually impacted the outcome for certain people?
I am having a PhD student help me out, he said CV and SOP are the most important.
Same from professors I met in a conference 3 weeks ago.
Conversely, I’ve heard from some professors that they don’t read the SOP
I think it depends on who precisely is on the committee
Everyone has different opinions on what’s important
That's... odd? How are they gonna know about what student wants to do if they don't read the SOP?
I have heard that they aren’t gonna read it f the first paragraph isn’t good, it will just get pushed to the side.
that may be true
There are many who believe your ability to write an essay isn’t reflective of how you’ll do as a math graduate student
I've heard some just delegate it to their grad students?
SOP contains your experience and future goals. So if they don't read it, how are they even gonna know what the student wants to do?
CV, past courses
letters of recommendation, probably
That too
I’ve heard this from not only some of my own professors but also a friend at MIT
because a recommender usually comments on research plans on their letter anyway
Has told me his professors said this
What if I have stellar CV but I write that I want to research goldfish in my SOP?
I've heard the same from a prof who taught there for a while
so it holds some ground
Again, the cv is more reflective of your ability as a grad student than what you put in your sop
there's a nonzero probability someone will check it - if the statistics are anything to go by, don't multiply
From what I understand, the reason so much focus is placed on the SOP during app season isn’t because it’s important, but because it’s basically the only thing you can control at the time of writing the apps
While most profs read it, it’s very common to place very little weight in it
From what I’ve heard
Yes, but its also where you can explain your future goals
SOP must be made credible by backing it up with CV, transcripts and LORs
that's the basic idea I have
I'm going to play devil's advocate and argue the goal on an SOP is seldom met
people switch domains a ton after entering grad school
you might say you're interested in diff geo for instance
Plus - it’s not too common to even have a super specific goal
but it's likely you'd switch to alg geo or something else
Like most people just mention a field
And pretty much every grad app has an option for that on the form
pre-qualifier stuff is wildly subject to change
They don’t need to read the SOP for that lol
besides switching, it's also unlikely you have a thesis in mind unless you've studied at a place that covers a lot more content than the US would during an undergrad
that or you're coming in with a masters
As for what I’ve heard is actually most important, it’s LORs
that's what I've heard as well
Like by orders of magnitude
A good LOR from professors the committee knows means they’ll probably just admit you
my advisor said he doesn't bother reading any sop unless he's really interested by someones letter or it's the final final round
Straight up
same with other profs I've talked to
the SOP matters when it's a matter of splitting hairs as far as I've heard
that and LORs are expected to provide a thorough breakdown of the candidate's practices from an outside POV
which makes it easier to assess how they'd do on a grad program
solid LORs, as far as I'm aware, offer a concrete comparison with other people from comparable places
IMO write the best SOP you can
put time into it
just for the psychological reasons
cause like what else is in your application?
LORs? You can't read those, you have no control over what's in them
Transcript? Can't fix the past 3 or so years, no point worrying about "what if"
but the SOP you have full control
so writing what you believe to be the best SOP you can is good psychologically for feeling confident in your application (at least this is how I felt)
Yeah I agree
SOP is the only thing you control
But the question was how important is it
I mean
And I was just saying from what I’ve heard: not very
what else are you gonna spend your time working on for your app lol
some schools find it to be important
some not
seems to be dependant on whoever reads your app
you lose nothing by improving your SOP
agreed
SOP “not being important” doesn’t mean a shit SOP doesn’t hurt your app. It just means that for the most part a good one doesnt help much.
But there is still some minimum bar you should attain. And that bar is reader dependent and you dont know what it is so do your best.
Btw I wonder if LORs are also more important than SOPs in the UK
(i totally understand one should write a good SOP, but just curious from a theoretical perspective whether LORs are more important)
That’s kinda what this whole conversation has been about
While I agree with others that you should write a good SOP, from what I’ve heard most professors would agree letters are more important
Letters are generally more important, but there's a nonzero factor that SOPs count for
I've officially accepted that grad apps are completely RNG
