If I understand everything correctly, currently the website's "flip" section doesn't account for the 1%/2%/2.5% auction creation fee (when you sell the item back) and you can't change that in options.
So, when you see some expensive item, you are trying to calculate the fee manually and figure out what actual profit you'll receive (and check that it's at least not negative). The profit percent feature doesn't help either, because it's related to profit and original price, not the target price.
So, it would be great if such option is available, because it seems easy to implement (just checking 3 condition statements and substracting the result, not related to any item's stats or prices on the AH) and it would be very useful
#An option to exclude auction creation fee from profit
33 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
It's just target price - cost rm
🤔
<@&869943787277926470> do you override the estimated profit the backend sends?
he does
By the way, is that an intended behavior that "Lovest BIN:" (the one enabled in Settings -> Lowest BIN) ALWAYS shows the same value as the target price, even if that is not actually the lowest price? And if you enable "Second lowest BIN", the second lowest BIN will always be zero coins.
Idk if that's a known bug, but I've seen it since I started using the website about a month ago
(attached an example)
the second lowest bin is not supported anymore since its the lowest bin displayed (gets pushed up by the new lowest bin displayed as flip)
The displayed lowest bin for flips marked as SNIPE should be the lowest bin with the same valuable modifiers, in that case at least that its recombobulated, maybe more
Oh, wow, seems like you've fixed it 🎉
Checked that with auction creation and claiming percents for a few items, the results are almost (idk why not fully) identical
Thanks
Can't even express how useful that is
Do you have an example of when it doesn't match?
How long is your listing time?
Sometimes it's just something like 2 coins
Sometimes almost 1k
Sometimes it's exact
maybe my formula is just wrong
But it's very close anyway
I just don't know why it's sometimes just a bit off
In general it seems to do it's job
So that's not really a problem
I guess listing time isn't in your formula and shouldn't be
I haven't checked this stuff on practice though, but I don't think that's important
it's almost the same formula as you use
I'm just concerned why it's not exactly the one
(maybe it's just different languages handling floating point precicion differently, but this is not some extreme numbers)
I assume a listing time of 48 hours and add the time fee for that, can't easily determine after it sold how long the original listing time was
But if you add listing time fee, the result would be more than that one
Okay
I guess
this is not important