#ot1-perplexing-regexing
1 messages · Page 8 of 1
In 2022, 78.36% of Twitch users are male, and 19.64% are female
and of top 100 streamers?
The Twitch leak from 4chan confirmed what a lot of people already know: The majority of the platform’s most successful content creators are men
Out of the top 100 creators, only three of them are women
it's indicative that the biological drive is stronger than any cultural bias
how so?
i fail to see the correlation there
because of the way that it is
that explains absolutely nothing, i'm afraid
Women in Western nations have freedom. They overwhelmingly choose not to go into science. Women in oppressive nations do not have freedom. They often choose to go into science as a means of escaping poverty. This is indicative of the fact that women, as a group, are less interested in computer science and math than men are
I stand corrected
freedom has absolutely nothing to do with cultural biases
i don't think you're fully understanding what that term means
As someone in a non western, but historically oppressive nation, this is not true. The ratio for female:male students in my BSc was around 1:8
You can say what you want, but women overwhelmingly choose not to go into science when they have the freedom to do so
93% of Arabs choose to be Muslims. Is that because their Arab ethnicity has biologically predisposed them to believe in Allah?
Your anecdote doesn't disprove that women in Western nations statistically choose computer science less often than women from other "oppressive" nations
beliefs and interests are two different topics, in my opinion
you could argue they're interrelated, but I was raised christian, it didn't affect my interests outside of religion
Whether they are or not, "coding is a boys job" is a belief.
It's literally not the same. One group of women has a choice, the other has less of a choice. When given more freedom, women are less likely to choose computer science
cultural bias does not imply a hard barrier or a lack or freedom. all it means is that, generally, society tends to predispose someone to certain ideas by exposing them to certain trends or telling them that one thing is more "accepted."
which group has less of a choice?
I'm not sure I follow the argument you're making.
Women in Muslim nations ostensibly have less freedom than women in Western nations
yet they are more likely to become engineers, despite the misogyny and assumptions of stupidity in those countries
that is to say, when given more freedom, women are more likely not to become engineers
oh, that depends very much on the nation - that's absolutely not true across the board.
I'm going to dip out of this convo, because I don't think either side is going to make any progress here... but I will leave you with this thought... even with all the marketing, the STEM, the preferential treatment through the educational and interview/promotion processes, females account for a minority in CS. Even when the path has been made easier, they're encouraged and pushed towards CS, they still don't even equate to anywhere close to HALF of the students/developers... that'd suggest that naturally, girls have less of an interest in going into these fields
there are Muslim nations where women are oppressed - but that's not inherent to Islam, and it's not true of all Muslim nations. And it's not related to my point, which is simply that the beliefs and attitudes of the people we grew up around influence our behavior throughout our lives.
the fact that all the marketing and positive reassurance hasn't even begun to anywhere near level out the gender diversification of newly enrolling students, suggests that it is nature, not nurture.
in my opinion
that'd suggest that naturally, girls have less of an interest in going into these fields
That's one possible conclusion, but another is simply that changing the beliefs of a society is hard, and despite the very visible PR campaign in favor of women joining STEM, it still doesn't outweigh the long standing cultural biases.
but anyway, ima dip now. Was an interesting debate though, and thanks to everyone for being civil throughout! 🙂 hope you all have a great day
While they can choose to go into engineering easier, they can also choose most other fields and still be fine. As you say, oppressed women get fewer options, and so STEM is more appealing. But when you can go into fields with fewer such biases, a lot of people will choose that.
That's your assumption. The most probable answer is that the differences are biological
imo all of the marketing and money and positive press swings have done jack crap to fix the long standing systemic issues that cause a woman to not want anything to do with the field
what makes that more probable?
why is that the most probable? there are a number of conclusions to draw.
And that's your assumption
Every presentation of evidence to you guys is met with "there's just a magical force across all nations culturally that makes things this way"
the most likely answer is not that, it's human biology
It is working, just poorly.
It is working. Woman representation in tech has gone up in the past 10 years, just at a slow rate
I find that pretty improbable. It seems quite unlikely to me that there's some gene that codes for "interest in software development"
are there better solutions? as much as some wish you could, you can't just reach into the brains of an entire society and root out biases.
Your genes literally affect every single aspect of your body, mind, and personality
sure, but so does the environment you were raised in, and the food that you eat.
Yeah, I do wish there was a less intrusive way.
It doesn't matter how great a diet you give to a dog, they will never learn to read
it's the same for people
... no?
yes
if you give people a good enough diet, they can definitely learn to read.
i have no better solution no... i just see a common exasperation of voices decrying that women do not take advantage of all the paths paved for them when those paths lead to the same cesspool we would rather avoid. i respect those that walk the path as they make the largest change
If they were born biologically incapable of reading, they would not
well, sure - but, clearly women aren't biologically incapable of coding, so I don't see what point you're trying to make.
there are zero dogs who read, but a non-zero number of women who code.
i just see a common exasperation of voices decrying that women do not take advantage of all the paths paved for them
i didn't realize that was something people felt. that's bizarre to me, so i don't exactly have a comment on that.
that women are biologically inclined not to study computer science
you've offered no evidence to back up what is quite an extraordinary claim.
Again, before the 80s, CS interest by women was about even with most other fields. So unless you think every woman in the 80s decided that they in fact do not want to study CS but want to keep studying the other fields, I don't think your point lines up with reality
and once again, women have been the majority of college graduates for half a century
if they were going to study computer science as a group, they probably would have done so by now
where does this suggest a biological answer for the difference?
That is an interesting article though
Women with more freedom are less likely to study computer science, women with less freedom are more likely to do so. Give the chance, women do not study computer science, as a group
Because CS is more full of biases than other fields, while not providing sufficient advantages over those other fields
even if all those statements are true, it doesn't imply a biological cause.
it is a path to making change that is needed. it is also a very poor place to exist, a minority in technology. on one hand we should walk the path and push all those to do so lest the majority win with "see, u do not want this" and take it away. on the other hand the chances of avoiding harassment, prejudice, and assault seem so low that it makes one question their own sanity to go through with it
It does, unless you're saying the culture between all those Muslim nations and all Western nations is somehow magically the same
another possible cause is that women with less freedom lack the freedom to choose not to study computer science, for instance.
Yes, exactly. When given freedom, women do not study hard science
in some societies.
In the majority of Western nations
Because hard science is full of sexism, and other fields aren't.
and probably all other nations as well, cultures made equal
My impression is that Malaysia has pretty reasonable gender equity - is that impression wrong?
You'd expect them to be even more sexist in oppressive nations
you've still provided exactly 0 evidence to indicate that this is because of nature. none of us are arguing this in terms of people who have no choice, we're arguing for people who do have choices and don't do this for other reasons.
Relative to other fields, not really
that is, I don't believe women are being repressed in Malaysia, and the article says that they're still more likely to enter CS
did you even read the article lol,
Passion for the field is important, but assuming that passion flows from biology or that it’s somehow innate ignores the ways in which culture and policy can reinforce girls’ STEM capabilities early on and encourage passion to develop.
that's their opinion
they probably wouldn't be able to publish at all if they had suggested there is a biological basis
which is all too common
Let's say I asked 100 people to choose between a bicycle and a scooter while my friend held a gun to their heads and told them to pick scooters, and all of them chose scooters. When I repeated the study by myself (no friend, no gun), only 30 chose scooters. Does that imply that the 100 participants in the second study were biologically predisposed towards biking?
Iceland the most gender-equal country on Earth... 24% of CS students are female... There's significant evidence to suggest it is more nature than nurture
there is significant evidence there to suggest it is 24%
CS is an international field (well, more an American field). I don't think it makes sense to separate countries to this degree
25.8 on this one, pretty close: https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/women-earned-the-majority-of-doctoral-degrees-in-2020-for-the-12th-straight-year-and-outnumber-men-in-grad-school-148-to-100/
The Council of Graduate Schools (CGS) released its annual report today on US graduate school enrollment and degrees for 2020 and this is an update of my annual post are the striking gender differences in graduate school enrollment and degrees. 1. For the 12th year in a row, women earned a majority of doctoral degrees awarded […]
which further weakens the argument that it is cultural, as not all countries have similar cultural beliefs
It's cultural among CS professionals, not among countries
you see it even here - the moderation staff has to deal with "there are no girls on the internet" jokes constantly.
but there's evidence of these decisions being made in pre-schoolers, as per the study I circulated earlier... I'm not sure the CS culture would have had a chance to impact a pre-schooler?
This is exactly what I'm talking about, every presentation of evidence is again met with "there's some magic cultural force doing this"
and there are many women on our staff who prefer not to be "out" as women on a coding server.
ye, pretty not fun
Do you think that the CS cultures of Malaysia, the US, and Iceland are more similar than human biology across all those nations?
understandably so. but I'd argue the opinions of pre-pubescent teens on the internet shouldn't affect your career choices, and if it does, you likely don't belong in a highly competitive field anyway
you need to have a level of self-belief and determination
Those teens are your peers who you have to learn from and cooperate with
You can't lone wolf your way through CS
oh, u can not blame it on teens/youth alone
you're proposing a biological difference without any suggestion as to what the mechanism for that difference might be, or where it arises from. Those suggesting cultural differences can point to very concrete mechanisms by which young women are trained to believe in "boy" jobs versus "girl" jobs.
Paper you linked states the following factors for higher $ of woman in STEM fields:
girls-only-schooling, compulsory math/science in secondary school, family friendly societies
So just having the support system to not push you away from STEM fields increases the % of woman in those fields
Why are there more girls in "boy jobs" is very sexist Muslim countries then?
it seems much more like magical thinking to ignore the concrete mechanisms by which women are underrepresented in certain jobs in media and education and the like in favor of a conclusion that there must be some unknown biological cause.
are those countries "very sexist"?
I don't have to point to a specific fold in the brain or gene to make an educated guess that the matter is biological
sure, but you're ignoring cultural factors that are literally in your face.
Moreso than Iceland
Would you agree males and females have different chemical composition within their bodies that can affect their moods differently?
Biology has a greater effect, that was the discussion
but you're just guessing at that.
it's possible that you're right, but it seems quite unlikely to me.
No we’re not, there’s evidence testosterone makes males more aggressive, etc
Chemical differences in the brian are biological and affect our moods
Affect how we feel, what we enjoy
No, I'm not. Women are statistically less likely to study science when they aren't literally forced to. What other factor besides biology would be a common undercurrent in literally all nations around the globe
it actually doesn't. Higher testosterone doesn't coincide with greater aggression.
I assure you it does, i’ve taken many steroid cycles
they're likely to have few female role models who code, for instance.
transmen who begin testosterone use are open about how it made them more aggressive/sexual, so I think you are incorrect
Top link, study evidenced it does too
How do you explain the development in women in CS from 1966-1980, where it went up about equally with medicine, law, etc.
The brians chemical composition affects our moods and interests, that is well evidenced facts
As are the biological chemical composition differences between males and females
There is a significant amount of evidence to come to the conclusion that it is nature mroe than nurture
fun fact, so does estrogen
What is it that made specifically women stop studying CS as much during after 1984 in contrast to e.g
medicine and law
I don't know the study you are talking about, and I'd argue that this 50 year period of women not fervently pursuing computer science is pretty good evidence that they just naturally do not
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/strange-but-true-testosterone-alone-doesnt-cause-violence/ for instance:
"[Historically,] researchers expected an increase in testosterone levels to inevitably lead to more aggression, and this didn't reliably occur," says Frank McAndrew, a professor of psychology at Knox College in Galesburg, Ill. Indeed, the latest research about testosterone and aggression indicates that there's only a weak connection between the two.
i don't think it's being debated that hormones affect emotions in some way. the question is whether biology gives one an innate predisposition to study CS.
but is it not reasonable to assume that if chemical composition can effect our moods and physical abilities that drastically, it is also a more likely contributor to our interests than cultural influence, especially when almost every culture on earth is involved
If what we feel and enjoy is not computer science, then we would not pursue computer science
Because colleges simply didn't accept women to a meaningful degree. This is the graph I was talking about https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/10/17/356944145/episode-576-when-women-stopped-coding?
okay? so that's a possible correlation. but there's no proof that that correlation exists, nor that it's actually what causes people to choose computer science. nor that it is more significant than any of many other possible factors.
it seems reasonable enough to concede that there could be unknown biological factors at play that make women less likely to pursue CS, but it seems totally unreasonable to discount the very obvious cultural factors at play.
same thing i said above ^
It's the most probably reason. Human biology is more static across nations around the world than is culture
as is true for the cultural influence
so we're left to assess which is the most likely
and as there's strong evidence that biological composition has a vast impact on every other factor of our lives, it's reasonable safe to assume it would also affect our interests
hm - why?
even if they're equally likely, but only one is under our control - shouldn't we still try to address that, since it has a 50% chance of being beneficial?
Because cultures around the world are not the same, but we keep seeing the same results
it's not necessarily 50%, it could be far less than 50% and probably is
you've misunderstood my question, I think. My question was why we need to decide which of the two scenarios is more likely at all.
no, because you're encouraging people into fields that they are not passionate about just because they have a certain biological makeup. Without the passion and drive, they will not succeed.
I don't agree, but - fine, even if it was 10%, wouldn't it still be worth addressing?
If a woman wants to go into STEM, she should be encouraged to and should be given all the same opportunities as a man who wants to go into STEM
BUT
it's not about encouraging people into fields they're not interested in, it's about removing barriers for people that are potentially interested
we should not be marketing and trying to encourage people into STEM when they don't express a genuine interest
Because you can't feed a dog a special diet that will make it capable of reading. In the same way, there's not much you can do to get people excited about science if they are literally biologically incapable/unwanting to do science
or we'll end up with people in my position
10 years into a career they have no interest in, because they were pushed into it by others because it's a 'good career'
u know u can change career right?
As if CS isn't full of men who just want the paycheck and don't gaf about the science.
Women have been the majority of college graduates for half a century. There is a hiring bias against men in STEM. How much more needs to be done?
Why can't we just admit that maybe there aren't as many women interested in computer science as men?
what we should do is: give every person on earth the same opportunities, the same education, and let them choose the path they wish to follow
not market certain courses
sure, but they're literally not. There are female coders. They like it. It's a totally reasonable conclusion that some number of females would enjoy coding if given the opportunity, but will be blocked from pursuing it by societal barriers. And if so, removing those societal barriers helps them.
national culture isn't being discussed. it's a question of the culture of computer science.
and it could also be argued that nationality is less signficant, to some extent, in the last (couple?) decade. we've (computer scientists) become increasingly more connected via the internet, which is distinctly a global network.
yes, I'm in the process of doing so, hence why I'm in this discord. but i'm having to work 60-80 hour weeks to upskill myself to swap careers
and I've wasted the last 10 years of my career
Some women like and enjoy computer science, apparently most do not, and no amount of encouragement will get them to enjoy it unless you are literally forcing them to do something they would not otherwise do
all because I was encouraged into a field I didn't have a genuine passion for
we could, but why would we? there is clearly a cultural force pushing girls away from programming
if u have nothing of value from 10 years of ur life, that is on u. i wish u the best in the career change and am happy u r finally doing it
there is a clearer biological force
because while you believe that to be true, we disagree.
but surely you agree that some percentage of women would enjoy it, and some percentage of those will be blocked from doing it because of societal pressures?
Damn. Tonight's a bad night to be a woman in this channel I guess.
is not every night?
The implication is that men are better suited to phoning it in, in that context than women are. That contradicts nothing said here
well, that depends - do you like arguing? 😄
oh I have plenty, I have money and I am in an elevated position in my field, in charge of multi million dollar jobs... but I don't have job satisfaction, no.
There usually isn't such overt sexism.
we're not arguing which is more clear. even if that was the case, we can't do anything about biological factors. why not focus on things we can change?
why? you've provided no evidence to suggest that, for some reason, biology plays more of a role than cultural influences.
I work for the money, not for the passion
we've provided plenty, it's just fallen on blind eyes
The number who enjoy it and are being barred from the field is probably much smaller than the number of men being barred from the field now by the absurd quotas that exist
To justify my existence in a male dominated field? lol no thanks
overt, sure, but usually all over this server as it is in the internet
i've seen the evidence you posted, and i see no correlation /shrug i guess that could be considered a "me thing"?
It's clearly not. As was pointed out earlier, Iceland is the world's most gender equal nation, and you have fewer women entering computer science than in "oppressive" Muslim nations
there's no sexism going on in this debate either
I've never heard of any company that has quotas. In fact, quotas on the basis of sex would generally be illegal in my country.
blind take
you're the only one who has said that those Muslim nations are oppressive, FWIW.
you're aware that different countries have different cultures?
okay, so why is iceland, the most gender-equal country on earth, not seeing equal intake of female and male students in CS studies, if the reason is nurture not nature?
Yes, and that across all those cultures we consistently see women choosing not to go into STEM
you just said there is a difference in the numbers between countries
they might not be very public about it but there sure are some sort of quotas
kinda seems like you're arguing both sides
The point is, no matter the cultural influences and gender equalities of the country, the CS intake for females remains around the 30% mark. Therefore, it is more reasonable to suggest it is a result of natural interests than cultural influence
because "most gender equal" means very little when you're talking about a global culture.
and "most" is exactly that, most. it's not entirely.
it's indirect. say a university wants to have 50% girls, 50% guys in CS. if twice as many guys apply compared to females, then more guys will be rejected
my understanding of US law is that hiring quotas based on gender are not legal.
Furthermore, the CS female intake has REDUCED during the same period the marketing/proaganda has INCREASED
if it were cultural, they should be correlated.
Woman in tech have increased in the past 10 years
Yes, men who want to go to these schools are being tossed out in favor of women who hypothetically might want to go. That's the issue
its illegal here in the UK as well but I can literally see it happen with my own two eyes, my girlfriend works for an org that does this
I've experienced this within a company in the civil engineering field too
Based on race is also illegal, yet here we are
negative. I posted the study earlier.
that's not at all what i said 🤔. an applicant wants to go to a school, that's why they applied
but they're not? The class size is fixed in advance, they choose the number of slots they'll have, and they accept that many people.
whether they accept 100 men or 50 men and 50 women, they have accepted 100 people who wanted to enroll.
@wraith flower
Yes... that shows an increase in the past 10 years?
but that does show an upward trend for the last 10 years?
it's also a weirdly cherry picked set of years, for some reason
a massive 2% wow
it seems like really misleading presentation of the data.
does that justify all the millions spent trying to goad a group of people with little interest in a subject, into that subject?
I assume you missed my earlier statement of my former employers promotion procedures?
it's every 5 years until 2018, which is when the data was collected i'm guessing. looks ok
a 3 percentage point increase, but a 17% increase.
yes, of 2%. Arguably static, as it was the exact same % in 2005-2006. So static enrollment, and a HUGE marketing/propaganda campaign
a HUGE swing in cultural attitudes
vastly more accepting of different genders, races, transexuals, skin colours, religions
yet minimal to no shift in CS uptake
and you still argue it's cultural?
when there's absolutely no correlation
I'm quite surprised at how many people are arguing that a campaign to say "you can be anything you want to be when you grow up" is bad.
that is a GREAT campaign
from 1970 at 14% to 2020 at 21%, that is to say a 7% increase over 50 years
literally why?
that's a 50% increase.
a campaign that says, however, 'IT DOESN"T MATTER WHAT YOU"RE INTERESTED IN, ENTER CS' is not a positive campaign, in my opinion
sure. But that campaign doesn't exist.
i don't think anyone was advocating for that
that's a strawman.
I haven't seen any campaigns like this anywhere
No, it's 14% of all degrees compared to 21% of all degrees
there's a vast difference between encouraging interests (aka "you can be anything you want when you grow up") and encouraging careers (aka 'we need more women in this industries to claim we're diverse, so you should be this.')
and a 50% increase isn't much if the number was small to begin with
yikes
i haven't seen any of the latter. most of what i see is like the former
right, so the proportion of CS degrees awarded to women increased by 50% over that time span.
I've never seen a campaign that didn't align with the latter personally
'women in construction' 'women in stem' etc
where's the women in hairdressing events?
the men in nursing events?
I have absolutely seen men in nursing events.
that's not "women must join stem", it's "women should try stem"
women in hairdressing are over-represented, so that one wouldn't make much sense.
we even had mandatory women in construction events at our college
that's a very small number for half a century, considering the number was small to begin with
they forced women to attend women in construction events
and that's not the latter campaign?
There are far more "women in this" events than there are "men in that"
i think its other men holding men back from entering the nursing industry more than women
whereas its men that are holding women back in most cases from entering STEM
I really don't think that is correct
if equity would be 51%, then an increase from 14% to 21% is a not-insubstantial increase. It closes the gap by around 20% (from women making up ~2/7ths to ~3/7ths of the split they'd equitably have). But yes, we should do better.
I don't believe so, I believe there is 'positive discrimination' towards women in STEM careers
they're generally given easier paths to progress, from what I've experienced
you've never seen people called gay or feminine for being nurses?
I have, yes.
oh?
ok, and who is more likely to use those insults? men or women?
Women, probably
what do you mean by "easier paths to progress"?
i would like to know as well
its men that perpetuate this false machismo BS
There is a hiring bias in STEM against men: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01532/full
Audits of tenure-track hiring reveal faculty prefer to hire female applicants over males. However, audit data do not control for applicant quality, allowing some to argue women are hired at higher rates because they are more qualified. To test this, Williams and Ceci (2015) conducted an experiment demonstrating a preference for hiring women over...
I'd also like to know these easier paths. Would love to share it with more women
it is true that, given a choice between equally qualified candidates, employers will generally prefer the one that increases diversity of the team being hired into. But that's not really an "easier path", it's a tie breaker that benefits underrepresented groups.
my former employer (civil engineering) had a policy that of all promotions, atleast 25% had to be female. Whilst females simultaneously made up approximately 10% of the workforce. You had 90% of the workforce fighting for 75% of the promotions and 10% of the workforce fighting for 25% promotions. That's not an easier path to progress in your eyes?
would you rather be 10% fighting for 25% or 90% fighting for 75%?
this is one of the largest companies in our industry by the way
a multi-billion dollar multinational company
no, that is a situational anecdote in my eyes
Another employer I worked for advertised a role and refused to review male CVs
either that, or celebrating that "yes, this is possible," usually with a side of "but yes, we can do better."
because we 'needed more females in the office' and it was 'positive discrimination'
it's literally not, the easiest and fastest way to get called gay in a derogatory manner is to decline a woman's advances
bad solutions to a problem dont mean that the problem isnt real
that isn't an easier path?
that's bad. That's illegal in the US, FWIW.
Easier to get hired in academia: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01532/full
Audits of tenure-track hiring reveal faculty prefer to hire female applicants over males. However, audit data do not control for applicant quality, allowing some to argue women are hired at higher rates because they are more qualified. To test this, Williams and Ceci (2015) conducted an experiment demonstrating a preference for hiring women over...
correct. it was illegal where it took place too.
we have proven u have had a poor track of employers, that is true
well, that's what whistleblower laws are for...
anyone who's been to school can tell you that kids call you things like these before you even think of showing interest to the opposite sex
eh, the latter was one of the best employers I've worked for, regardless of their strange policies whereby they cared more about someone's gender than ability
but the former was a poor employer, I'll admit that
I don't think a 28 year old male nurse is worried about what a random middle schooler thinks
people arent born 28 year old nurses
but regardless, of the 3 employers I've worked for in this industry... two discriminated against males in favour of females
no, but a random middle schooler who might one day become or not become a 28 year old male nurse does.
and the current one I work for somehow has 70% of a female workforce in an industry that has 24.8% females
regardless of the blatant disregard for hiring practices they were pretty good. well, there u go.
Probably not
so I struggle to see how that would have occurred without similar policies
though I've not formally witnessed anything yet
You don't think peer pressure influences choices that lead to career paths?
yes, but less so than nature
the large majority of male nurses were once random middle schoolers. the same applies to the rest of professions.,
the biases you develop are often from a very young age
It's easier to get hired as a woman in academia, elsewhere too: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01532/full
Audits of tenure-track hiring reveal faculty prefer to hire female applicants over males. However, audit data do not control for applicant quality, allowing some to argue women are hired at higher rates because they are more qualified. To test this, Williams and Ceci (2015) conducted an experiment demonstrating a preference for hiring women over...
I disagree, but at least that's a defensible position.
I literally do not know any men who would say that being called gay in middle school is more of a reason to not be a nurse than is the constant social attacks be female nurses as the only male nurse in a hospital
i.e. if I sat in school and wanted to be a professional wrestler, I'd be ridiculed remorselessly, but if I truly wanted it, I'd still pursue that career path
that's wild. I feel like you and I live in radically different worlds.
allow me to read ur article for u hun
in review:
Basically, everyone preferred the more accomplished X and Z candidates over the less accomplished Y candidate, regardless of Y's gender.
whereas if I was born with chemical compositions that made me less interested in being in the spotlight and physical confrontation, I wouldn't have been
bullying as a kid absolutely shaped my interests, and those interests shaped my aptitudes, and those interests and aptitudes shaped my education and career choices.
You guys wanted to say that it's men "perpetuating machismo BS" I've never heard a grown man use "gay" as an actual insult, literally only adult women
I agree, likewise.
BUT
I also had pre-defined interests before I went to school
before I went to nursery
And when they were equal, they overwhelmingly chose the female applicants
before I watched tv
before I was subjected to cultural influence, I had my interests
Try being gay. You'll hear it more.
This channel is SPICY today.
those came from genuine natural instincts and interests
there was never a point in your life before you were subjected to cultural influences.
people are exposed to cultural influences from birth.
the gay men I know also say that women are the ones insulting them for being gay. In fact I knew a lesbian who immediately started called my gay friend a flamer when he wouldn't agree with her
I was in an all boy school growing up. Gay and other homophobic slurs were extremely common
yes, when both had to do the same amount of work to be of equal skill the choice was made on other factors
And as an adult in medical school, who is more likely to start ostracizing you and throwing homophobic slurs around? Because it definitely wasn't the men
yeah, "smear the queer" was a schoolyard tackle/tag game when I was a kid.
"Yes, all things equal, there was a massive privilege in being a woman"
there literally is no female version of the word "doctor" in my mother tongue
jesus christ, did you grow up in the hood or something lmao
because 'doctor' is unisex?
no, but rural area, and I'm probably older than many of the people here - this would have been in the early 90s.
there's literally no female version of the word 'doctor' in english languages either?
I can't speak for that as I don't have any experience in that regard. I could reach out to the one male nurse I know, but considering he was called slurs even before starting nursing, I doubt his experience will fall in line with what you're saying
doctor references an academic achievement, not a profession
privilege? so both were equally deserving, put equal work toward the goal, and it is privilege when one is chosen?
you become a doctor by completing a phd
in english maybe
it's a certification, not a gendered career
"We both worked equally hard, how is it privilege that I got the job because I was born a woman?"
yes that is what i am asking u
in actual languages lmao, the word doctor is male in greek for example
you literally just stated that of two equal candidates, equal qualifications, experience and abilities, the female would get chosen more frequently than the male
there is no female version of the word, but somehow this wouldnt affect women from becoming one?
no, because it is a qualification not a career.
you can have doctors of art
youre not following
I'm struggling to understand why you're applying gender to an academic qualification, yes.
You asked what easy paths women got, there you go
in languages that have a bit more depth than english, words have genders
if the language you speak isnt reflective to cultural thinking i dont know what is
well we will just need to look up the other factors used to judge the applicant. hmm, probably boring stuff like likability, first impression, tone, control, and professionalism. bet that is a neat study
how was that "easy", if the woman worked equally hard as the man and became equally qualified?
yes. and in french 'baguette' is gendered too... do you think that means females can't touch baguettes?
you are ignoring that all the work to get there was equal
there is no male or female version of the word "doctor" in English
I'm trying to find this in the paper, but I don't think this was even tested at all? So are you just making this claim out of thin air or have a credible source for this?
the world doesnt revolve around english
And?
but all being equal, that'd be equal too, no?
CS does, technically
why would it, it is no longer in their control. it is the choice of the employer which, as you have very helpfully pointed out, is biased as heck
occupations are gendered because of cultural norms at the time, its one example of how culture affects this "conscious decision" of joining a given profession
I'm confused what you're asserting? you admit a gender bias in hiring etiquette but are simultaneously arguing that isn't a privilege?
okay, but food products were also gendered. does that stop certain genders interacting with that food?
the real answer is that they don't care
the original claim was that women had an easier path to employment. from the sounds of it, after all the hard work is equal between, we just present ourselves better
yes, the willingness to find an excuse for any evidence presented made that apparent 😛
the study did not involve any actual candidates. it was just picking based on resumes, essentially
I guess the fact that the majority of CS employees are men is that most men just present themselves better
there's a number of conclusions that can be drawn. But it'd be fair to assume that people in the same position will have presented themselves similarly, given equal level of ability, experience etc... over a large dataset, you'd have a pretty even split between presentation of self
here's another way you could interpret it: when an employer has a policy to always break ties between equally qualified candidates in favor of the one that is a member of a historically underrepresented group, they're likely choosing the one that is a harder worker, since it takes more effort to gain the same credentials as a member of an underrepresented group.
interesting take
I do agree that'd impact it somewhat
and again i ask where is privilege in a choice that is out of your control? that is not privilege of a woman, that is sexism in the system. the very thing i wish would burn in the sun
Interesting debate, but it's extremely late for me. Gonna read up on this tomorrow
I do definitely agree that our attempts at equity shouldn't be getting us to take less qualified candidates, and we should always be looking at things through the lens of how we choose between candidates of comparable "quality"
.bm 1034969624078450820
so you're arguing anything outside of your control is not a bias? so as women have full control to go into stem if they so choose, there's no bias?
you've just contradicted your entire argument
You're arguing in favor of sexism, nobody has to support that
am I?
and once again, the majority of college graduates have been women for half a century now, that doesn't sound marginalized to me
yes
and that's where we agree... hiring should be solely on ability to perform in the role
it's literally systemic privilege
i never claimed woman could not. i celebrated those that do. they are strong than i. i get enough harassment for my lifetime just being online
and if they're entirely equal, why not increase diversity?
no that is systemic sexism there is a difference
Yes, you're privileged by that systemic sexism, congratulations on pretending not to be though
as they should be. Those who CHOOSE OF THEIR OWN ACCORD to go into STEM fields should be given full support and utilities to do so. I'm not arguing against that
I'm arguing against just pushing anyone we can into STEM fields because we need to get the numbers up
did not say u were
if it's their passion, give them everything they need to thrive
if not, don't encourage them into something they might not enjoy and regret in 10 years, like I do
thank u hun, i think
You asked how women have an easier path, there it is, honey
and it sucks that you are subjected to online harassment. I have to admit the internet as a whole is very biased towards men. Can't say I'd want to be a female on a chat server.
all the work, and 'privilege' in the end
Yes, you're privileged because a man who did all the work didn't get chosen while you did, explicitly because you're a woman
I'd say that makes life easier
sounds about right for the source
it takes quite some mental gymnastics to argue that men are the underprivileged ones.
This brings us back to the original statement
There is a hiring bias against men in STEM
"When you're accustomed to privilege equality feels like oppression."
Is that why it's so hard for you guys to admit that being hired over an equally qualified man is privilege on your part?
systemic I might add
I want to reiterate my point... hiring should not even consider gender, professional statistics should not even consider gender, we should not be segregating developers, nor aspiring developers, by their gender. The ONLY thing that should matter is the applicant's ability to perform in the role. Does anyone disagree with that?
also, men and boys are discriminated against at all levels of education, I'd say you're pretty privileged not having to deal with that
oh here we go
When you're accustomed to privilege equality feels like oppression.
All I did was state a fact
I think I agree with all of that. I see attempts at equity through the lens of attempting to break echo chambers and find new sources of candidates for jobs, encouraging people from non-traditional backgrounds to apply, pushing for greater access for underrepresented groups to the educational prerequisites for a particular career, etc. At the point where we're considering candidates for a job, the most qualified candidate should get it.
equity in companies' hiring should come from finding ways to broaden the hiring funnel and find new sources of prospective candidates. It should never come from choosing less qualified candidates at the expensive of better ones.
and this is true regardless of what type of equity we're talking about - gender, race, class, etc.
Just so you know, your privilege isn't just in academia or STEM, it's everywhere: https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-acquisition/how-women-find-jobs-gender-report
make sure to be mindful of it going forward, you need to do better
i need to do better? says Tyler?
That's right hun
I see nothing I disagree with there. I suppose the only difference between our viewpoints is how we interpret the marketing campaigns, and our personal experiences of them. Having been pushed into a career I don't particularly enjoy, I feel pretty strongly against advocating for a certain career path for people... where as you see it as broadening the funnel to provide more opportunities, which I also somewhat appreciate...
Perhaps women are more likely to be hired because they cost 30% less to employ.
the wage gap is unironically a myth
has the rest of your position been ironic?
oh u r just funny now
that would explain a lot
I do have to say that the pay gap is a myth. I've seen studies that negated it, plus it makes absolutely no commercial sense
If you, as an employer, could cut your operating costs by 30% and get the same output, you'd do so without blinking
it's not a myth, but it's true that it does disappear when you slice the data certain ways
you also have to factor in things like maternity leave
one way to slice the data to make the gender wage gap disappear is to discount CEOs and senior executives.
since the positions with golden parachutes tend to be overwhelmingly filled with men.
"If we just base our worldview off the Apex Fallacy..."
Maternity leave likely impacts that somewhat. Can't say most businesses would operate smoothly without their senior staff for 9 months
there was a recent headline about how 75% of the time that you spend with your child in their lifetime will be spent by the time they're 12. It's actually quite tragic that lots of companies give men far less paternity leave than they give women maternity leave. It robs men of a huge amount of time with their children
parental leave policies are another place where I'd like to see far more equity.
I think there should be more maternity/paternity leave, from what I understand the US has basically zero compared to other countries
I forget where it is, but the government sends couples basically a gift basket of baby stuff once they are expecting, it's really cute lol
Sweden
yeah, that's quite nice.
the US has essentially no social safety net in lots of dimensions, but yeah, parental leave is one of them.
i got an email to schedule an interview, right. but the only available times were like within 30 hours of the email being sent
that's a little bit weird, but not totally unreasonable
usually I'd expect them to offer times over at least 2 days, but depending on their resources, and the availability of whoever is conducting the interview, that might not be possible.
if one of the times works for you, select it. If not, reach out and let them know that none of those times work for you, and you'd like to reschedule.
yeah, i had it this morning. all the times were like, 8-8:45, 8:45-9:30, 9:30-10:15
hm, we have interviews scheduled today for next week, sounds more reasonable tbh
last time i got an interview it was a phone review with about five minutes notice... one would like more warning
hah, wow. I've never had one on that short of notice, though I have had one or two days notice before...
that sounds so bad
i got the feeling mine was just a 'do we like the way you interact' for the call. got scheduled for a followup a few days later
honestly interviews are a scam. just hire me 😭. i swear i'm qualified
that is the right attitude!
lemme fix you up with this quality discord referral
also i got asked the "how do you make 4 gallons with 3 and 5 gallon bucket" question as a technical question, which is like, possibly the most known "brain teaser" ever
Ohno, did you apply to jane street or something
my flatmates will tell me stories of interview questions like that. so weird
u hiring for a game show or a developer?
my friend got an internship there, but she's goated
How you gonna get them VCs swooning if you dont have pizazz
I swear im gonna get in some day, jane street or citadel
The dream is real and ongoing
cope lmao
😔
Citadel people apparently highest paid finance techbros
Something like 650k GBP a year
the other technical questions were really dumb 😔. one just asked you to read java code and say where the error was. the code was like
class Main{
psvm(String[] args) {
Person p = null;
p.setName("e");
}
}
``` and they asked what the error was 😔
They gave you java?
yeah. oh another was
String a = "test";
String b = new String("test");
if (a == b)
Sop("true")
else
Sop("false")
``` what's the output
Is this a graduate role? I would think junior roles let you pick the language for problems
internship. i think the role asked for java. and also the problems weren't about solving problems, just testing how well you knew java
I guess
do you have chipotle ~across the pond~
Part time or even full time role out of reach?
We do have chipotle, wtf
Its not even the best one
Smh
The Person class has not been imported, so this code will not compile.
oh i didn't put the other part. it was an impl of Person something like
public class Person {
// stuff
}
``` the assumption was it's in the same package i guess, so it would be fine
having eaten Mexican food in the UK, I assure you: the UK does not have Mexican food.
psvm isn't public static voic main, rejected
i was supposed to point out that the implementation didn't have comments 😔
wait wtf
Mayhap not anything authentic but have you tried Wahaca
is that oaxaca but butchered is that a proper noun lol
actually, yeah - it was fine.
Fuckin love me some wahaca
have you had Mexican food in the US?
No, but soon
oh??
it's only a slight exaggeration to say that the worst Mexican I've had in the US is better than the best Mexican I've had in the UK.
GF is gonna drag me there for a trip so I assume i'll have some good food
hm?
though Wahaca was the best Mexican I've had in the UK (out of a not huge sample size)
yeah, the context of the question was like, "what would you suggest your coworker change if they wrote this code" and i didn't see anything actually wrong, but missed "comments" when they prompted for "style" 😔
where 👀
Its the best of the chains, surely there must be some family owned small business mexican place that is better
hmm, i wonder what Person.setName does :ferrisClueless:
Colorado and a bunch of other states probably
the US is real, real big
be sure to plan out which states, and how you're getting between them, in advance 🙂
Literal square state
the first impression that people from Europe tend to have when they visit the midwest is shock about how absolutely empty it is
no coast?
california is silly big for that statement... i did some work for the... um... something emergency agency after the fires there a few years ago. i remember being shocked at how big the area codes in it were. u could be in a code affected by fire but still hundred miles away easy
also i need a security clearance for this job, so i need to remember everywhere i've been for the last 7 years 😔
yeah - huge state, with huge deserted areas.
a ton of California is just basically uninhabitable.
Probably more east coast, NY definitely and maybe MA for lovecraft reasons
darn meds 
😤 good choice 😤 NY kinda 👎, PA >
did you misread MA as PA?
Going off more on a foodmap
I want lobster bisque
Southern bbq
Tex mex
no
Boston's nice. NYC is pretty nice, too, as long as you stay the hell away from Times Square
why does the triumph emoji looks like someone sneezing
Im sure Massachusetts was the inspiration for Arkham and related towns
the most touristy part of NYC is by far the worst part of NYC.
zip codes the size of my state, just silly!
Philadelphia is the US's only World Heritage CIty, though.
Though, what are you going to do with that much land really.
meth?
That's my home city...
what's a world heritage city
basically.
ooh, be sure to try root beer while you're here
it's a common soft drink that Americans like and Europeans seem to hate, and I find that hilarious 😄
I've tried some already and its disgusting
Mmm, I miss me some Sarsaparilla.
why would anyone ever
not old enough
lol, I have no idea why y'all dislike it so much 😄
why is root beer called root beer again?
i think the only reason my gf likes it is because she dumps tubs of icecream in it
you can still get sarsaparilla, and it's quite good
the root beer float is a time honored tradition
Frosty mug, vanilla ice cream, and root beer.
why would you ruin ice cream like that
a coworker from Spain said that, to him, root beer tasted like he had brushed his teeth, and then spat the toothpaste foam out into a coke.
hilarious 😄
he just avoids root beer now
(he also didn't like birch beer, but it was less visceral)
Understandable. I hope he avoids toothpaste foam and coke as well.
How is charge (Q) split when a 2nd identical capacitor is introduced into a circuit?
In series
Is it just a 50/50 split?
Or is it like how parallel components have the same potential difference (V)?
all capacitors in series will have the same charge
regardless of their capacitance
the voltage across each capacitor will be different
Will the voltage be split 50/50?
For 2 identical capacitors
yeah
ooh ty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAew-_3XMDU i choked on the first one
Just block it and move on
2002 FIFA World Cup
The 2002 FIFA World Cup was the 17th FIFA World Cup, the quadrennial world championship for men's national football teams organized by FIFA. It was held
Brazil at the 2002 FIFA World Cup
At the 2002 FIFA World Cup, Brazil participated for the 17th time in the event. The country remained as the only national team to have participated in
Already do
Really preaching to the choir here
oh no
lmfao
promote to mod now!
what are some good android phones but with small display
i mean its performance is good, everything is good but it just has a small display
punishable act
moderator intervention is required
Rust is a language
good observation
I got the problem fixed! Had to modify the endpoint a bit but it seemed to be a simple fix after all
Bruh r/shitposting had instructions on how to refine uranium
Yeah they have instructions on all sorts of crazy stuff
If they were removed I have them downloaded
A secret tool that will help us later
already do
whip my what now
The whop
You got it downloaded 👀?
why are you all making things sounds cursed-er than they have to be
'tis the month for cursed things
whips your Whopper
what the fuck
*whop the fuck
Why it has to be way too often something weird as soon as I open these channels
A special tool that will help us later
There's three parts to it
Well I didn't actually download it
I just saved it
Didn't watch any of it either
No time
It's probably a troll
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enriched_uranium#Enrichment_methods the process is described on wikipedia
Enriched uranium is a type of uranium in which the percent composition of uranium-235 (written 235U) has been increased through the process of isotope separation. Naturally occurring uranium is composed of three major isotopes: uranium-238 (238U with 99.2739–99.2752% natural abundance), uranium-235 (235U, 0.7198–0.7202%), and uranium-234 (234U,...
afaik the hard part of processing uranium isn't the technology, but the sheer scale needed to get useful yields
I dunno if he's joking but be says he's got 1 pound of thorium
yeah, I know nothing about thorium
if i know anything from factorio, you need like 360 raw uranium for 1 u-235
Depends on the methods too, if you are using gas diffusion or centrifuges
Allegedly
Or a breeder reactor, theoretically
Reminds me of the time in high school our teacher googled prices of uranium because our class decided we would love some
and was it affordable?
@thick ore its a debian based distro that was made by a student
Its speciality is its gui which was made in node.js
It was the only distro that had most unique gui but it was discontinued before getting out of beta
i actually have no idea how it works
Ok
Not really, so we didn't make our small enrichment plant in class :c
Sounds like Chrome OS
The whole "Linux distro uses a web based UI"
aw pity
@violet root https://www.instagram.com/berlin.1969/?hl=en
let me see
his beard make his chin look more big
😅
saitama bod > gigachad bod
Ohno, I put a handmade plush i once got from a friend in a washing machine and it lost an eye...
But damn, it needs to be in the washing machine. Because moisture got in where it was and mold grew on it T.T
I put lots of borax and laundry disinfectant in there, I hope it all goes well
Hm, the buttob I saw near the door doesn't look like the one that the plush had as an eye... Maybe it was stuck to something else i threw in there 
Plush asking for help :c

It's all for its own good! I don't want to throw it out, so it has to go through tough de-mold-ing
(with hyphens because it's about mold, not molding)
c r u e l
EVERYONE
We made a skribbl.io game in which all words are related to programming, if anyone wants to join use https://skribbl.io/?tzF6lkTwgRPc
You gave me a scare there for a second. Thought it was a kid in a washing machine “asking for help”
It's one of the foxes (or at least what my friend meant to be a fox, but made by someone who didn't really know what fox looks like)... So kinda like a child to me
My partner says it's an anteater
The face looks like that
uh, if i wanna ask an algos question in #algos-and-data-structs do i gotta spoiler things
idts, why do you think it should be
cause i wanna ask about a solution to a leetcode question
i would imagine some people would rather not see a solution out in the open
doesn't really matter tbh ¯_(ツ)_/¯
ok well anyway
today's leet https://leetcode.com/problems/group-anagrams/
top python solution claims
class Solution:
def groupAnagrams(self, strs: list[str]) -> list[list[str]]:
groups = defaultdict(list)
for s in strs:
groups[frozenset(Counter(s).items())].append(s)
return groups.values()
``` is linear, but isnt this O(n*m) where n is number of words and m is length of word
also somehow sorting the words and making tuples got me 99% speed even tho its slower technically
leetcode really do be trippin
the constraints are comically low
1 <= strs.length <= 10^4 0 <= strs[i].length <= 100
yea some how this is a medium, but i dont think it should be
/shrug sorting is speedy and compact
same code, 2x speed difference
hella yikes
yeah, leetcode timings are useless
ig a bunch of people submitted code at the same time i did for the first one lul
memory variance can be explained with random python hash seeds causing less or more efficient hash distributions
hmm. that wouldn't affect memory usage, just lookup time, right?
well, you can get a more unfavourable bucket distribution, forcing you to make more buckets sooner
it doesn't use buckets though, it uses open addressing. afaik it only resizes based on the number of elements
I have a question, I was helping a friend take an old school Chromebook to take it off of school mode but when it reset it went straight back to school mode. How did this happen and is there a way to fix this and reset the Chromebook fully?
anyone wanna play mc with me and friends? if so dm me ur username and i'll whitelist u and send you the ip !
sounds very sus
?
cracked?
at pvp? no im not
I saw this thing a while ago where you can plug it into a socket and get a ethernet connection to your PC and stuff however I can't seem to find anything like it on Google. Anyone know what this is?
Dial-up?
Uses phone lines which are usually near sockets
I think I found what i was looking for
I googled wireless ethernet adapter but still not sure
Gotta find a cheap one now....
39 😭😭
they are called powerline adapters if I understood your requirements right
i found probably the oldest mention of thumbnails
what's the importance of taking in a length parameter when taking in an array in C?
without a length a C array is just a pointer, so how can you know where it ends?
(there are some ways if the data is non-arbitrary, e.g. null-terminated strings)
how about the sizeof length trick?
wdym?
sizeof arr / sizeof arr[0] i think
oh, you mean, like, void f(int arr[])? hmm, lemme check how these arrays work
well, gcc warns me it won't work:
<source>: In function 'int f(int*)':
<source>:2:19: warning: 'sizeof' on array function parameter 'arr' will return size of 'int*' [-Wsizeof-array-argument]
2 | return sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0]);
| ~^~~~
int arr[] means exactly the same as int *arr; it's just a pointer
you are trying to get the length of the array in a sep func?
ah nvm
Hi guys.
Consider this example:
What are you doing?
There is an asking word ("what", idk how its called), then verb "are", then object "you", and then all other words. Everything is ok.
Lets change it:
What you are doing?
There order of object and verb is different.
I was taught that it's wrong, but i dont think this sentence has no meaning.
My questions to native speakers: has the meaning of the sentence changed, if so, what does it mean? Are there any new shades of meaning? Do you use similar sentences (sentences with the wrong word order) in colloquial speech, if so, why?
I think it means the same thing just with weird (to me) grammar. makes me assume english is their second or third language
you might end a sentence like "do what you are doing" but the topic of that sentence is "do x" and not a question
the second one
What you are doing?
doesn't feel right when used in a question
it's also the same in german
doing are what you
Most native English speakers would probably assume the words are now in the wrong order in the second phrase. Otherwise they are very much the same sentence depending on which word is stressed. "What are you doing?" is very different than "What are you doing?". The first asking about the action, the second asking why you are doing the action.
In my office the non-native speakers very frequently place "you" in what sounds to be the incorrect place. I hear "What you are doing?" frequently enough.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subject–auxiliary_inversion has more on this. Note that "are" is an auxiliary ("helping") verb and the sentence would usually be parsed as having a verb phrase, "are doing".
The subject-auxiliary inversion rule in (most standard forms of) English is so strong that we even invent auxiliary verbs in order to invert them, e.g. "What do you know?" instead of (non-standard) *"What know you?" which is how you would ask that question in most Indo-European languages
thanks you all!
What are some good android phones but with small display?
Hello, anybody knows a good badminton tutorial for self learning?
Best you can do is check your community for any racket sports clubs
And then show up, become member, buy the gear
And find people to play with socially
That's the problem there aren't any clubs nearby here
What is a reasonable amount of time for corporate IT to provision a cloud compute (Azure) server + NAS and configure them behind the company VPN?
the servers are to be in a different country than the IT department and the VPN so there might be some complications there
gonna be taking linear algebra 1 for summer 2023 session. What would you guys prefer? A monday and wednesday class but from 1PM-3:50PM or a Mon/Tue/Wed/Thurs class but from 9AM-11:15AM?
the latter
yes the latter
the latter also seems to be just more minutes?
but imo the higher frequency and shorter periods sound nicer
yeah, i was thinking that too. only 2 days of torture instead of 4
i also hate sitting for long periods of time. so i will most likely go for the 4 days a week schedule 
also not a morning person.. but oh well.
for sure the first one
wild
I prefer the 4 days, 2 hours a day for linear algebra is enough. If more than that, maybe I will eat in the middle of class or I will eat a lot of food before the class, studying algebra needs energy 😅
Whichever one works with the rest of your timetable better really
I'd probably choose the first option if I could
well
well
what method?
ok, whats the code?
code?
a,b,c = int(input("A :")),int(input("B :")),int(input("What :1.Add / 2.Sub / 3.Mul /4.Div"))
print([a+b,a-b,a*b,a/b][c])
a,b,c = int(input("A :")),int(input("B :")),int(input("What :1.Add / 2.Sub / 3.Mul /4.Div"));print([a+b,a-b,a*b,a/b][c])
ONE LINE IF ;
oh hello viv
one line sense tingling?
Yes
here is my best try without ;
¯_(ツ)_/¯
two lines
😦
(pg:=__import__("pygame"),__import__("pygame.locals"),ri:=__import__("random").randint,sc:=pg.display.set_mode((600, 600)),cl:=pg.time.Clock(),sp:=pg.Vector2(10,10),sb:=[],di:=pg.Vector2(10,0),nf:=lambda:globals().update(fo=pg.Vector2(ri(0,59)*10,ri(0,59)*10)),nf(),[(sb.append(pg.Vector2(sp)),sb.pop(0),sp.__iadd__(di),(sb.clear(),sp.update(10,10))if(sp in sb or not(0<=sp.x<=600and 0<=sp.y<=600))else None,(sb.insert(0,pg.Vector2(-10,-10)),nf())if sp==fo else None,sc.fill((0,0,0)),pg.draw.rect(sc,(255,0,0),(fo.x,fo.y,10,10)),pg.draw.rect(sc,(255,255,255),(sp.x,sp.y,10,10)),[pg.draw.rect(sc,(255,255,255),(p.x,p.y,10,10))for p in sb],[((1/0)if ev.type==pg.locals.QUIT else di.update({pg.locals.K_w:(0,-10),pg.locals.K_s:(0,10),pg.locals.K_a:(-10,0),pg.locals.K_d:(10,0)}.get(ev.key,di))if ev.type==pg.locals.KEYDOWN else None)for ev in pg.event.get()],pg.display.update(),cl.tick(10),)for _ in iter(int,1)])```
snake, 1 line
one line wiht ;
viv likes 1 liners
ayo what
A snake game (with pygame) on one line
no semicolons either?
None!
jesus
wow
My secret: tuples!
i cant undrstand tuples
with some help from him
how did you actually know tho?
lurking
oh
I was reading #python-discussion
myb do that
oh
see
you are my favourite vivax
Well I could, but not without breaking discord tos, this servers rules, and risking getting banned xD
and risk getting killed
you cant do that?
Well I could make a bot and somehow convince admins to invite it, but botting my own account? No you aren't allowed to
do you know how to code in python?
no like just to skim through it and ping you if the term is allowerd or not
Still self botting
Yes?
its the python server....
oh that sucks
in that case what does this do? ```py
print((:=(:=builtins.getattribute((:=name.len().class.doc.getitem((:=(:=(:=(:=name.getitem(name.ne(name))).add().len()).mul().add((:=(:=name.getitem(name.ne(name))).add().add().len()))).mul((:=.mul((:=.mul(_).add(name.eq(name)))))).add((:=(:=.mul()).mul((:=.mul().add())))))).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem()).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem(name.ne(name))).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem((:=(:=_____.mul()).mul((______________:=.mul()))))).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem((:=(:=.mul()).mul()))).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem((:=.mul()))).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem((:=.mul()))).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem()).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem()).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem()))))((:=name.len().class.doc.getitem().add(name.len().class.doc.getitem())))).doc.getitem(:=(:=.lshift()).mul((:=(:=.mul()).mul().add((:=.mul((:=.mul(____)))))))))
you ran the code didnt you?
you were supposed to work it out in your head
but why Z?
i have no idea
i hate you
aww thank you
maybe
AHHH SHI
😄
😄
I hungry now
oh hey it's my obfuscator output
who doesnt have an alt? xD
print Z
like I have 3 twitch accounts 🙃
NO SHI SHERLOCK I TRIED IT
why is it so obfuscated?
BUT WHY
here's one to import re and assign to a name (assuming python 3.11.0) ```py
(:=(:=builtins.getattribute((:=name.len().class.doc.getitem((:=(:=(:=(:=name.getitem(name.ne(name))).add().len()).mul().add((:=(:=name.getitem(name.ne(name))).add().add(__).len()))).mul((:=.mul((:=.mul().invert().neg())))).add((:=(:=.mul()).mul((:=.mul().add())))))).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem()).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem(name.ne(name))).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem((:=(:=.mul()).mul((:=.mul()))))).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem((:=(:=.mul()).mul()))).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem((:=.mul()))).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem((:=.mul()))).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem()).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem()).add(name.len().class.doc.getitem()))))((:=name.len().class.doc.getitem().add(name.len().class.doc.getitem(_______)))))
you see that's the point
they look exactly the same
....
how the fuck does it work then?
WE NEED cereal to explain what is the point
double this
so people cant read your code
ohh
if you stab the person who made this, you are a cereal killer
it's supposed to convert code into a no constant, underscore only, dunder attributes only, parentheses only, no tuple mess
its what you do when you are paid for the lines of code(not technically but you get the joke)
😕
this wayy high level for me
(inspired by the stuff i manually did on the 3rd of august 2022)
wait, you are paid per line? I have been doing it all wrong!
ye
not me tho
well time to create a tool to spread python code to as many lines as possible (without just adding blank / dummy lines)
peeps said they were paid by lines
i like this vivax more
i could lighten the restrictions by allowing tuples which would make a ton of obfuscating easier
😦
man i dont understand anythin
sorry not sorry the goffy ass pfp was better
if you insist
yes
but i think we need a red inspired vivax
dont you agree?
how about you add blue as well
🤔
my profile icon is literally a rainbow, what more colors do you want xD
so to minimize code?
or somethin else?
when you are paid per line: py print\ (\ "\ h\ e\ l\ l\ o\ \ w\ o\ r\ l\ d\ "\ .replace\ (\ ' '\ ,''\ )\ )
Gtg
pinging you on reply
bye
it may or may not do that
actually it shouldn't do that
my legs hurt from doing squats
oh you have those minigame on your profile too
ninja have to do their training no complaining
im complaining
failing as a ninja
🥷
pathetic
you lack the discipline
you got a problem with that?
ninja dance
this is off topic we are allowed to do that
huh??? why say that when did we talk on topic to begin with
this is an off topic channel
we can talk about whatever we want
as long as it is in the server rules
uploading the newest update to my game now
can you try gem miner?
can you explaom wjay oy os?
can you speak english?
nes
you can find the game in #ot0-psvm’s-eternal-disapproval
Dreams can be weird but not really random. Dreampt last night about building a PC with dual EPYC 7343. One could say it's a dream PC.
I could just be a massive nerd too
In the dream, I was literally in a Discord call with it. Since the H12DSi does not have on-board audio, I had to use USB. I remember saying "If you can hear me, the audio works on this thing".
that's gotta be the most hilarious dream i've ever heard
especially the "If you can hear me, the audio works on this thing" 😂
Heya, is there a way to convert data fetched from the database to it's actual type defined from the database itself?
I have a database with all it's data type configured, I'm using Codeigniter just to make a simple API, but all the data that's fetched is in the form of string even though I defined some of them as integer in the database.
If I'm just getting a single row then I guess I can typecast it from the Codeigniter itself, but what about multiple row? Looping through each one of them doesn't sound efficient
It was
sounds fun
David S Pumpkins.
@analog shale, re: #python-discussion message
what langs do you mean?
hm, I guess like rust/dart?
compared to something like java/C++
hmm, I'd count Go as a recent language and it has the notion of public/private, albeit in a weird way
access modifiers definitely help with static code analysis though
quite easy to tell some variable is never used for example
which is almost impossible to do in python, because one must assume that a public api might call it
yeah 🗿
also we have the __all__ = ["..."] hack instead of just pub def func():
hey now, it's not a hack, it's a feature™️
realistically though I wonder why we still have protection levels in C# as we do
besides better static code analysis
there is so much System.Reflection usage in production code bases, on top of testing and mocks
I'd hope there's not a lot of reflection in production code
they should be reflecting on their choices otherwise
sometimes you just have to make patches to some nuget library
since their not really as well maintained as the python stuff
pun overlooked 😔
btw, fun fact, the way you use to get information out of struct tags (best practice for adding metadata like how a field should be serialized in JSON/YAML, etc.) in Go is by reflection
poor man's System.Reflection 😔

