First of all, it leaks more than the fact it's being luks
Secondly and as I apparently can't tell you often enough, I never said that they do anything wrong, both of them use either of the stand of the art approaches to it and yet both of those have trade offs which should ideally not be required
Upon the verification thing, if you actually were into cryptography you would probably understand what I mean with authenticated, think about this
If you have any cipher text and decrypt it with a key, is there any way for you to know wether that key was the right one or your result is just gibberish right now( remember it might just be a file from /dev/random so the thing might very well just be random gibberish) but you always have to wonder is it the right gibberish and the methods of encryption which allow this are called authenticated ones. If you aren't aware of that this discussion about cryptography on disks is pretty much useless because that's the thing XTS does not do and LUKS does perform but with a trade off




heck!






