Louis (corrigez-moi svp)

[lethal imp]

Please be patient

Our volunteers look into many questions every day; sometimes it takes them a little while to answer.

Pro tip: you can rename the thread title with `.tr <thread name>`

Make it descriptive, including relevant context, but also to the point. This way you improve your chances of getting a more relevant and specific answer.

[zenith cosmos]

i believe this works, but i would ultimately formulate it differently

"attends de voir le subjonctif"

lighter, and avoids the question altogether

[turbid ore]

Yeah thats how i ended uo saying it but i thought it was fun to say it using the subjonctif xD but was usure if it was valid or not

[zenith cosmos]

if you switch subject you would have to use the subjunctive, but here including the subject just feels clunky

[turbid ore]

A ce que tu le voies?

[zenith cosmos]

yeah

[turbid ore]

Yeah sounds better tbh hahaha thanks mon pote

[tacit pike]

je pense pas que cette phrase soit correcte, "attendre à + nom" ne fait pas sens

[zenith cosmos]

ah yeah

"s'attendre à" but "attendre que"

[turbid ore]

wait I got confused now, so attendre à qqch is wrong?

like wait for something

[zenith cosmos]

Waiting for someone to do something is attendre que.

J'attends que tu arrives

[turbid ore]

so if I really wated to use the subjonctif I would have had to say "attend que tu le voies"?

[zenith cosmos]

Yeah, still feels unnatural to me though. But Flynn might feel differently when he sees this

[turbid ore]

well yeah I mean is not the best way to say it for sure, but just as a troll/forced way to use the subjonctive xD

whats important to me right now is that is gramatically correct even if nobody says it (I dont wanna confuse people or beginers)