#đă»general-2
1 messages · Page 142 of 1
just another way to do it here.
I am quite sure I am doing the write thing but the calculation seems off
yeah that's the way i did it
it's fine, what you did there
@marsh linden by the way, i haven't lost your message yet.
cool. take ur time
I'm really rusty when it comes to binomial stuff and pascal but what's the method for getting from the second-to-last line to the last
oh shoot
haha thank you so much
I didn't check that
oh jeezus, binomials. probability wasn't my strongest suit. (got a 51/100)
basically he goes from N-3/1 * N-4/2 * ... * N-j-1/j-1
if there are n terms, then the second last coefficient would be (n choose n-1)
yeah hang on, trynna read the steps lmao
@viscid sable íìí©ëë€
No hables coreano acĂĄ por favor
eres brasileño?
Soy qué?
SĂ
aja, por un momento pensé que eras coreano
bueno, no entiendo lo que dijiste, solo aprendo coreano desde ayer jaja
Y yo pensé que eras español nativo
@marsh linden hopefully this makes it more clear for at least one part.
naa, ojalĂĄ lo fuera
Yo no hablo español muy bien, yo solo revolvo(?) las palavras en portugues y espanol
Sà lmao portuñol
Let me see
!> revuelvo
F14 saving everyone's grade
then the final line comes from here.
oh shit ye, the first photo makes complete sense
never would have occurred to me do it like that
legend
haha. yeah. the products confused me. i just made it easier for myself.
@junior citrus eres coreano?
like i prefer to have n terms rather than {j-2 terms}
so i just fudged it like so.
ye its bc theres other stuff going around it (this was just part of the question) but yeah i agree
what is that? calc?
No, pero estoy apriendendo con MemeMcQueen lol
This is binomial distr
entiendo
But the course itself is about evolution
puedo ayudarte si quieres
Nosotros estamos en un servidor llamado LLK
I probably coudl've been smarter and used (n-3)! straight away rather than n!, but again. my 4:49am brain wasn't smart enough to immediately get the answer in 1 or two lines.
Yo quiero, pero yo hago muchas preguntas ă ă ă
Puedes unirtes LLK, tenemos mucha gente dĂvertida allĂ
Y nosostros jugamos ëë§ìêž° there
puedes invitarme?
One day I want to major in pure mathematics 
it seems so interesting
but I'd do it just for fun
I'm pretty sure I will never have time to do it, though 
for us, pure maths is only offered at some unis at an honours level.
i guess it's "mainly pure maths"
but doing honours goes further into things like topology
I see
because i did some optimisation courses... which i would say aren't really pure maths
it seemed more applied to the real world.
but stuff like advanced calc and complex analysis and courses containing calc or linear algebra in general seemed more pure maths.
tbh, i dont really know what really consists of "applied maths" and "pure maths"
plus since it was Bsc, I had to do some compulsory science course more related to like biology, chemistry, and physics
anyways. creo que deberia dormir, asi que no puedo ayudar mas
could someone explain me what voltage is
like
I understand the example with pressure
but I don't understand what it really is
like why I can find what the current and voltage is using kirchoff methods?
why does that make any sense
Sorry. Dunno physics.
sorry, dropped physics in year 12
Iâm a chemist not a physicist đ€·ââïž
en mi opiniĂłn siempre es bueno aprender cĂłmo funcionan las cosas un nivel por debajo de lo que uno necesita
(me deprimirĂa estudiando en la escala sub-planck)
nah I'm solving that using an online calculator
I'm too lazy to solve that by hand 
it'd be like 9 operations
so

hand calculations are pretty pointless these days
yes
code it to work once and then automate it
well my electronics class teacher told us that these days no one solves matrices by hand, and he doesn't understand why in some classes that's a requisite
mathematical methods was my fav class 

wait I made a mistake
This ain't better 
This is easy but tedious 
at least there are like 3 resistors in short
(I have to find the total resistance when sw1, sw2,sw3 are in short and when sw4 is a zero
Me sigo preguntando como es que meringue puede resolver eso...
who is that
the autor of Python
Guys, I was looking for rigorous mathematics books about calculus, and I found this book called Spivalk's calculus, and it sooooo good. I haven't read it that much, but it seems pretty cool
it seems like the books explains everything you need to know
even the theorems and properties
Is it available online? like pdf file.
I have AP Calc exam coming soon (in May), if anyone knows resources for reviewing the materials, please let me know!
Spivak or baby Rudin
every book is available online
Not mine
@west thicket
psssst
hey pixie
@still radish! Oi! 
hope you haven't murdered your fiance yet 
Hola pix!
Nope!!! I almost did this morning
I'm surprised he hasn't taken me out yet though @still radish
Im just so completely BORED and he just wants to watch MOVIES
đ€
Im so bored I went out and drove around yesterday, shit I have the gas to waste
dont waste gas if you dont need to

đ„
omg the number zero is so cool
let a â b such that a < b and c â b such that b < c
b-a > 0 and c - b > 0, therefore
(b-a)+(c-b) > 0 => c > a


hes drunk
Or a WC
let a < 0 and b < 0, then we have that
0 -a = -a > 0
0 - b = -b > 0
so (-a)(-b) > 0, therefore ab > 0

omg isn't it awesome
numbers that belong to the natural set of numbers
I omitted that part because I'm lazy UWU
even though it's really important 
qué es esto canal
este*
aĂșn no sĂ©
es como una cueva para discutir disciplinas cientĂficas y tecnolĂłgicas (?)
talk about things that don't quite fit in #âă»general while still following #đă»rules
like it's a bit weird if a maths convo were to go on in #âă»general for example
does anyone have any podcasts they would recommend?
about what?
in Spanish?
if it's in spanish it will be need to be basic with help
like the duolingo spanish podcast
hmm...
this appeals
oh
not listened yet
then I have one that you might like
ah those episodes are too short
https://www.youtube.com/user/lexfridman/videos this one is a podcast where this guy "lex" talks to people that do stuff related to comp sci, mathematics and physics
and each video is like fifty-minute-long(?
No



@abstract scaffold is a differential equation linear if all the coeficients have a power of 1?
is this a function where all the derivatives are natural numbers?
well no
I mean, is this a function made of derivatives?
and why is x there? like why not F(f(x), f'(x), ..., f^(n)(x)) = 0?
I am still wondering how are you able to solve that xd
@still radish maybe you will like last podcast on the left
@old shell 16GB edition? is that the storage?
Ah I see đ
enjoy it! Pixel has now a friend 
Haha
I'm just now opening the box
Do you use an ethernet with yours?
Ethernet cable
Yea
I want to make sure pixel doesn't get disconnected for no reason
even though my router assigns static IPs weirdly
but yes I do
I want to buy double-sided tape so that I can stick my rasppi to the wall
what does that do?
that's me
@median trail linear differential equation is where the derivative operators are of power 1.
i.e. just the derivatives themselves.... you're not squaring doing (dy/dx)^2 ... it's just dy/dx or d^y/dx^2, no fancy squares, cubes, square roots.
but the derivatives themselves should be equal to something that's linear?
oh okay
let's say you have d^ny/dx^n etc.....
if you have y^1 only afterwards as a variable, it's linear.
but as soon as you have y^2, or sqrt(y) etc... somewhere, then it's non-linear
@median trail 
regarding to this. this is just a nth order differential equation.
another way to write it would be
phi^(n)(x) + ... phi'(x) + phi(x) + x = 0
@median trail i can't exactly remember if this notation meant there are constants out the front, it probably implies that..... so like a_n in front of the nth derivative.... but i cant exactly remember.
"it's just a function containing all the possible derivatives, independent and dependent variables"
I guess it implies there's a constant... because you can morph functions together when it's arbitrary and just name it one function
yeah. i think it implies constants out the front (if necessary).
i've only really seen this notation when doing PDEs
basically that's saying. a differential equation with the solution for phi(x) is in that general form.
just stupid notation.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/383377678385938432/693999384131534868/unknown.png
i'll try to explain better. if you look at the image:
the first DE is linear because the function itself, not the derivative here is "cu", and "cu is linear". since it's du/dx, we are looking at to see if f(u) is linear basically.
second examply, again the f(u) = u, so linear
third example, f(u) = omega^2*u, again linear
fourth example, f(u) = u^2, not linear
fifth example, f(u) = gsin(u), not linear.
@median trail
this is what i meant by the y^1 thing
if we have dy/dx, or higher order derivatives, and f(y) is linear, then it's a linear DE
linear means straight line function
or y^1, or just y (can attach a constant to adjust steepness)
are you sure you took the derivatives correctly?
I will try them again haha
=wolf graph 1/x^2 -1/x^3
ok, lemme take a step back.
what's the DERIVATIVE of x^2
to check you have your derivative correct, try integrating back.
2x?
k, lemme take a step back. what's the derivative of x^n
nx^(n-1)
Hence, what is the derivative of 1/x^n
1/(nx^(n-1))
yes both
technically none are needed, but they can be used to solve 1/x^n derivative
ok. if 1/x^n = x^-n, what is the derivative of 1/x^n
wouldn't it be -nx^(-n-1)?
yes. (done the stupid quotient rule way, never do this, haha, it takes too long)
hence, what is the derivative of 1/x^2
then, what is the derivative of 1/x^3
-3x^(-4)
hence, y' =?
-2x^(-3)-(-3x^(-4)
Cliffhanger!
see you thank you!
is there anything I can help you with? @gusty ermine
Yes please!!
okay, please tell me đ I'm glad to help
Okay, let me solve it, and I'll show you
Great! Thank you so much.
Thank you i will try to understand that. I haven't learned hospital rule but F14 mentioned that before too
maybe i should take a look at it
yeah it's just a quick way to solve trig limits
but this way is more like using identities and algebra
Oh wow, I really actually understood that step by step at once.
I am like speechless. Thank you so much for your clear explanation.
I am stupefied that I actually understood that at once.
If you have time, can you help me with this one too? I don't know how to make sign chart for second derivative and how to get zeros in the first place.
okay, give me a few minutes, and I'll check that out
Great! Thank you so much!
points of inflection* sorry lol
if you have any other question please ping me
I'm heading off to bed
Thank you so much
so I'll check them out later
=wolf point of inflection of 1/x^2 - 1/x^3
another way to solve the limit is to "rationalise the numerator"
This way is using l'hospitals rule
@gusty ermine +C is reserved for indefinite integrals because differentiating any constant results to being 0.
thus, when differentiating, there should be no +C in your final answer.
Also, points of inflection "may happen at y'' = 0
you have to check both sides. in this case a potential case as x=2. thus checking x = 1 and x = 3 on y'' to see if there's any concavity changes. i.e. one results in <0 and the other results in >0
take note of your domain of your function though. using negative x values as your test is incorrect as you "jumped on the other side of the domain", you have to split it into their relative continuous parts "where it splits at x=0, since the function doesn't exist there"
(-infinity, 0) is one part of the graph
(0, infinity) is the other continuous portion.
@grim lava or @narrow phoenix banshee has apparently got banned. Can you unban him? He hasnt done anything he says.
Idk what happened but everyone always says "I didn't do anything"
There was probably a reason
Haha @rough lava agree. But he says he didnt do anything. I just promised him to ask. Don't know him alot, but yeah there is probably a reason.
It's worth asking
You're a good friend
"Don't know him a lot" I see you're practicing social distancing too
Jk lol
Haha xD Thanks. I just meant I haven't talked to him a lot. Only a few times.
Agree
como es ext-4 y forzaste el apagado estĂĄ tratando de ver si puede rescatar algo
despuĂ©s de eso deberĂa tratar de tirar el launcher
Entonces estĂĄ trancado, ya van 5 minutos...
Se habrĂĄ roto el disco duro?
Tiene sus años ya
sĂ, desde ahĂ creo y solo creo que se puede pedir una terminal de root
Hago double boot en un wd 500gb del año del pedo
Intenté altf2
No puedo
"Superblock mount time is in the future"
đ | ticko leveled up!
deberĂas tener una terminal en ctrl + alt + f2
y tratar de lanzar lo que uses para ver las figuras
xorg supongo que debe ser
deberĂas tener una terminal en ctrl + alt + f2
@mortal dagger no, no funciona
Supongo que porque no es grub esto
Es distinta la pantalla a la del grub
No sé, la reinicié
lo Ășltimo que se carga es WPA supplicant
Antes de que aparezca esto
que es para el wifi
pero carga el mĂłdulo igual
debe ser porque instalaste algo automĂĄgico
o sea, se prepara para que si instalas una antena wifi, llegue y funcione
No se, lo unico que recuerdo es haber instalado 2 drivers que no eran
Quise instalar los de amd e instalé uno de nvidia y otro de amd para una versión distinta
eso es otra cosa
Ahà la reinicié
A ver si explota todo
Otra vez la primer pantalla
Pero otro mensaje
Dios
un error nuevo es siempre un buen augurio
pero funcionĂł alguna vez?
estå recién instalado?
cĂłmo lo instalaste?
un error nuevo es siempre un buen augurio
@mortal dagger no cuando no hice nada para solucionarlo
pero funcionĂł alguna vez?
@mortal dagger sĂ, lo vengo usando hasta el viernes
Lleva meses instalado ya
cĂłmo lo instalaste?
@mortal dagger con un usb boot
Pero es que andar andaba genial
Incluso jugué a EVE Online mientras trabajaba en una vdi
Onda andaba de 10
Intenté arrancar desde un usb, también se cuelga
Se moviĂł
May be a hard drive issue.
It says sectors
Try booting from live media then going into some tools to check the disk for any bad decors
Sectors *
What are you using for the live media
And are you sure you are booting the media - not the drive
Oki thanks
They have Channles for Linux windows etc
Btw windows works like a charm
Its on another ssd tho
So im just suspecting its my hard drive that got all messed up
hola
Does anyone know The SCP Foundation?
I need information about useful for the humanity SCP objects 
t!daily
đ§ | F_u_k_u_y, you received your đŽ 200 daily credits!
@sacred estuary please refrain from using commands outside of #đ€ă»general-bot
My apologize
I was looking for a chat like that but I didn't see it
I wear glasses
Sorry
no worries
glasses club
broken eyes club
@abstract scaffold Thank you!! I keep confusing derivatives and integrals and hopefully I get that straightened out by may haha
derivatives and integrals are opposites
Question: Is #âă»general always like this?
Indeed it is mi amigo
Does anyone know The SCP Foundation?
@vital ginkgo i do
Question: Is #âă»general always like this?
The armpit of the server
hey general is the best channel
noted and muted, gracias
@gusty ermine don't worry, I do the same thing

Does @real imp have any memes
@unreal pagoda
@real imp do you know some beneficial SCP objects? Like SCP-999
No not really
Oh, thanks anyway
Can we play a game?
Me? ok
Sure.
dog
good
Dinosaur
room
Mithochondria
Searching
grooming
Gear (what is ananas)
dinner
YOu don't know?
No
In Spanish?
Yea?
Oh, I thought it was only in English. Ok
Uhm
Rugido*
Do you want it only english then?
No, both are nice
Number
Rare
Excéntrico*
Orbit (should be a word in english, right?)
Triangle (I guess, although it's the same in Spanish)
Element
Table
Energy
Year
Ring
Ground
Dick
Kangaroo (Can we use names of people?)
Reality
Yellow
Wind
Dry
Youth
hook
Kaleidoscope
Escape
Ernesto*
Orange
Elementary
Young
Grill
Lemon
Near
roof
Floor
round
Disastre Disaster
Disaster*

Run
Next
text
Tendency
Yield
Diamond
Drown
Naroa
Art
Trouble
Epilepsy
Yang
great
Thickness
stick
Knowledge
Edge
Elephant
Trunk
Kind
drink
Kimono
Onion
Nature
Example
Entarimado*
Opinion
Nugget
Trick
Kilt
Take
Elena
what the fuck
Animated
lmao
Drain
theyre playing a game edsel
(I hate N's)
Haha
New
Wrong
Green
Ent
torn
Wanna join?
i guess
Ring
god
Hm, did I lose?
Nah, just say something else
Rules
shark
Nitrogen
?
are we taking turns
I guess
Yes
One
Explendit
try
yearn
Nunca*
arrepentido
oh
Entidad*
dagger
Round
Said already
Rodar
Is it a word?
It's a Spanish verb
Ah, alright.
oh
redo
Office
umm
Guys, I have to leave. It's late here
ok
Oh, okay.
Good night
Night!
I am learning Por and Para I need help
... por/para
#741548 đŁ https://www.spanishdict.com/guide/por-vs-para
... para/por
#741547 đŁ https://www.spanishdict.com/guide/por-vs-para
... por-para
Thanks
both please haha
kk, give me a few minutes, I'm going to wash some dishes đ
Thanks!!
ok
does anyone like code golf 
this is the first one @gusty ermine
Thank you so much. I can't appreciate you enough.
Wow I have one question and I am like hmm and I look at the board and the explanation's just like bam! there. I was like did he read my mind or something xd thank you so much
glad you like it
Thank you so much. Your detailed explanation really help me to get why things turn out one way or another. I admire your handwriting and math skills.
I guess I did the ladder one a similar way, but not quite.
I love that exercise because it's soooooooooo common when studying related rates of change
it's almost like a cliché haha
I bet it's been the first exercise quite a few people have been introduced to when studying this for the first time
I found it quite confusing to know what is meant by "distance between ladder and wall" but I guess they mean the bottom of the ladder.
a cheeky answer would be to say 0
but we'd need to add an extra option
@median trail i didn't introduce a dy/dt really.
:0
Omg I love the notation for the derivative of the X hahaha I saw it on my diff eq textbook uwu
x with a dot above is more like "physics notation"
yea
yeah I never understood why there were so many notations in calculus-related concepts
well I'm sure I was told but Ive since forgotten the reasons
Wow I feel like i've learned that but I don't understand
sometimes they were developed independently and now they are interchangeable conventions.
I don't quite understand the history behind calculus, like there were two people developing its foundations, and that's why there are different notations? But don't quote me on this, I'm not quite sure haha
when working with infinitesimals sometimes Leibniz notation s more intuitive.
Yes, Leibniz and Newton independently discovered calculus.
yeah. x dot is newtons notation iirc
yep
Newton was a bit of an ass, and when he was head of the royal society he declared himself the inventor of calculus.
lol
you put a number on top apparantly
In differential calculus, there is no single uniform notation for differentiation. Instead, several different notations for the derivative of a function or variable have been proposed by different mathematicians. The usefulness of each notation varies with the context, and it ...
leibniz notation is much more common, except in physics.
look at this bad boy
Oh I've used the one that contains the D when solving differential equations
this one is incredibly confusing haha
what have you tried?
do you know the vertical and horizontal asyptotes of simply y = 1/x?
For the top one, I tried drawing graph and I know that the graph will not touch (-3,0) and (0,2), but because there is b, I think the values can differ a lot
do you know the vertical and horizontal asyptotes of simply y = 1/x?
@abstract scaffold no i will check right now
@abstract scaffold no i will check right now
x axis and y axis?
ok.
I didn't even think about y=1/x graph. I think I should be able to figure that out. Thank you!!
left rectangles are rectangles where the top LEFT corner of the approximated rectangle touches the curve
I think the equation is y=-(1/(x+3))+2
hence find a + b
@gusty ermine I'll try to explain what I did for the ladder question.
ladder slides down wall 3 feet every minute. The ladder is constantly going to be 25 feet long. Thus, the hypotenuse is 25.
Thus, "falling down a constant rate of 3 feet per minute" means intuitively we can see the tip of the ladder is 25 - 3t feet high where t is in minutes.
we now have the hypotenuse 25 and one side 25-3t, so we can figure out the other side with pythagoras.
this ends up being x(t) = sqrt(150t - 9t^2)
differentiating both sides with respect to t, since we want the rate of change for this side.
dx/dt = (150-18t)/(2sqrt(150t-9t^2))
remember the side we came up with earlier (25 -3t)
we want this to be 7 at that exact moment.
25 - 3t = 7 implies t = 6
thus, dx/dt at t = 6 results in 7/8
@gusty ermine try manipulating your equation you just found in the desired form given in the question, then find a+c
I wrote a+b earlier. I meant to say a+c
did you solve the first problem F14?
the ax+b/x-c one?
||b ain't needed, yeah||
or I think I solved it*
how did you get 'dx/dt = (150-18t)/(2sqrt(150t-9t^2))' for the ladder question?
oh i see
from there it's just differentiate with respect to t
yup makes sense
know how to differentiate a sqrt of a power to the half.
then use chain rule to differentiate the inside function
if you couldn't find 25-3t intuitively, then refer to edsel's method partly.
dy/dt = -3 {from question, falling down at 3 feet constantly. falling tends to be defined as negative velocity}
dy = -3dt
y = -3t + C {integrating both sides}
at t = 0, y = 25 {from question, ladder is 25m and hasn't fallen down at t=0 intuitively}
25 = C
thus, y = 25 -3t
then you could continue on my path if you wish after that.
Yeah I see. I really need to be able to do those haha
I think I got the equation for #35
y=2x/(x+3)
so a+c=5
does b matter at all?
I don't think it matters because the question doesn't specify it and I've put many numbers in that place but it didn't do much
yeah
yup. thank you so much
one method.
that is what I did
another method is to intuitively find an equation that satisfies horizontal asymptote y = 2 and vertival x = -3
I feel like that method isn't as convincing, You would at least need to make sure that the equation has the same form.
are you studying calculus ticko?
I see
Why is oblique asymptote c asymptote?
c asymptote?
oh.
it says "which is a horizontal asymptote since a is a real number"
hard to write with mouse
How do you edit the profiles on #đ€ă»general-bot ? tengo curiosidad 
hm
gracias kiko (estĂĄ bien q te llamo asĂ?)
Of course
so at the end i went living in spain and i lived there for almost a year, now im back in italy, new achievement SPANISH LEARNT, well now im missing euskera lol. when all this quarentine shit ends ill go back there
Tenemos a algunos vascos aquĂ, Ranger
ah sĂ? yo estuve trabajando en donostia
usé este discord por 1-2 semanas antes de irme (:
a ver si estuve en tu pueblo.. pasajes, zarautz, zumaia?
!
pero es como parte de mi vivienda
tenemos un barco ahĂ y solemos pasarnos mucho tiempo durmiendo en el puerto en verano
zumaia fue el mas bonito, zarautz solo tenĂa la playa enorme grandĂsima pero nada mĂĄs...
zumaia es hermossso
es lo mejor
el flysch, el mar..
y el pueblo es bonito por dentro
por algo grabaron juego de tronos ahĂ đ
fuimos a ver los flysch sĂ, esas rocas.. bastante hermoso todo, sĂ.
pasajes pero también casi os gana eh
Is derivative of natural log always in absolute value sign?
?
derivative of ln(x) = 1/x
Integral of 1/x = ln(x) + C for x > 0
integral of 1/x = ln(-x) + C for x < 0
derivative of ln(-x) = -1/(-x) = 1/x
thus combining the two cases for the integral gives
integral of 1/x = ln|x| +C for x not equal to 0
the absolute value is to take care of the domain issues
https://tatsu.gg/dashboard @gusty ermine Para editar tu perfil
EstĂĄ bien que te llame asĂ *
@gusty ermine if u didn't see my message. scroll up a bit.
what's the domain of ln(x)?
All real numbers greater than 0?
ok.
whaaaaat why youâre talking about maths xd
so you know that derivative of ln(x) is 1/x right?
yes
try differentiate ln(-x) using chain rule
it's 1/x!
all real numbers except 0?

ohhhhh
This is magical
so integral of 1/x = ln(x) for a certain part of the domain of 1/x and ln(-x) for the other part
they can be combined to ln|x|, which coincidentally make calculations easier when doing definite integrals. Else, you would have to spilt it to two different integrals and evaluate separately.
I see. Thank you so much!!
nw
Thanks "Evil" đ
Does anyone know how to find a movie online
I need to watch 'Hamlet' 1991 version starring Mel Gibson
for my english class
it's not available on netflix nor amazon prime
Did you try you tube
Vudu
Redbox
(Idk if you have access to any of these btw)
Plex
Google play
Apple tv
Popcornflix
Flixster
Try you tube, apple tv, google play, and vudu first @gusty ermine
Then try the others I mentioned
@unreal pagoda Thanks!! Appreciate it. I found it 
so in a you're trying to make R1 the subject?
and b) R2 the subject?
if so a) is correct on the final line
checking b) now
Bueno, primero tenĂa que despejar R1 y despuĂ©s R2.
the lone term on the LHS, yes
interesting, I've never heard that nomenclature
rearrange this equation such that x is the subject
I normally see "solve for x"
that works. but normally I'd expect a real number or something if it said "solve for x"
Rayos, me tocarå aprender lenguaje matemåtico en inglés.
F = ma
a = F/m {equation rearranged such that a is now the subject}
sure, makes total sense. I've just never heard it phrased that way
maybe it's regional
But then it's correct what I just did?
yes
both are fine
"right" might be preferable because it can serve as an adverb and modifies "to do"
Ok, I'll get used to using "right".
"good" is an adjective so in that sentence it would modify "something"
"something good" = a good deed, maybe
una obra de bien
You really help me :D
happy to đ
@bold gull Finally I did something right/correctly. I prefer to use correctly.
Can't I say do?
I wanted to say: "finalmente hago algo bien".
Or does it have to be "did" anyway?

It doesnât sound incorrect to me to say âdoâ, but maybe âdidâ is more natural
Okey dokey.
@bold gull it should be "Finally I did something right"
"I did something good" would sound more like "hice algo educado"
NO
oki tia
yes and no

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
can someone explain to me
where did the x go in the final step
also the 4
like
i dont get that last part
it's like magic
poof
gone
OHHHHHHHH NVM I GET IT I GET IT
nice
that's smart wow
common factor 2x-1
xD
I don't use this method.
or is it dancer?
it's called the "cross method"
it's basically a trial and error method
for the coefficient of x^2, list the combination of factors on the left hand side.
for the constant, list the factors of the constant on the right hand side.
cross multiply and see if they sum to the middle term, in this case 7x
2x crossed with 4 2x*4 = 8x
yeah, i wrote that on the top








