Just as the title says, I believe the new titles should be re-done, perhaps with community suggestion. The reason being that they haven't been implemented fully yet so it's not too laborious, and that they simply don't feel right.
To explain what I mean by they don't feel right or fit I will reference the first place rewards (There are plenty more, but this post need not be that long):
• 1st in Glory will have "Avatar of Joy." This one feels like a very strange choice. I understand that Avatar and God can be synonymous with one another, but where does War translate into Joy? This title is earned through constant fighting. Yet it doesn't feel like it actually reflects the deeds done to procure it.
• 1st in Arena will be getting "Fencing Master." My main gripe with this one comes from the lack of neutrality in the term. What I mean by that is this is earned by dueling, not with any specific weapon. Yet the title references proficiency in one handed swordplay. Which is not a commonly used weapon in the game, people main anything from spears to hammers and it would be nicer to have a title that reflects the person's experience.
• 1st place guild leaders will have "Grand Guild Marshall," to me that sounds like a complete downgrade from the original "Grand Guild Master." It also doesn't feel like a title belonging to the leader of a Guild, but of a high ranking officer within an army. Although it's at least in the realm of familiarity.
It just feels like the titles were generated by AI rather than someone putting real thought into them, which to me isn't a good look.
