i Really like the idea and the settings for the season but i think 4 or 5 man would fit more to open world base spots so juzst boost it up it would make more sense. less offline timer more ppl that being part of a defence or in a offence its very hard wipinga openworld base with 3 ppl
#new conq season
dapper dirge
rugged agate
it will remain 3man for this first season
quartz coral
@rugged agate will it be a slow leveling process like regular conquest or will it be everyone can get lv 100 day 1.
halcyon leaf
<@183409122933211136> will it be a slow leveling process like regular conquest o...
I mentioned that on the original. https://discord.com/channels/235406555934228480/1302048195337130004
Thr problem is the linear graph for level. The rate doesn't matter if experience requirement is low asf
radiant crater
<@183409122933211136> will it be a slow leveling process like regular conquest o...
Don’t ping Ronnie please. #old-elite-ark-rules
dapper dirge
it will remain 3man for this first season
1 ally allowed in conq season it would fit with conquest
wispy bolt
Allies ruined conquest for me personally.
dapper dirge
Allies ruined conquest for me personally.
mega allys okay fien but one 1
wispy bolt
Got raided by tribe of max and their blue tag
dapper dirge
if you are solo its pretty hard
wispy bolt
We were a full-ish tribe had about 8-10 defending. We just had no chance
Imagine a 3 v 6
rugged agate
No allies for our first season
radiant crater
Allies ruined conquest for me personally.
Same. No allies way better
late harness
Whats the point of 3 man with 1 ally lmao. Might aswell do a 6 man at that point no ally
halcyon leaf
Whats the point of 3 man with 1 ally lmao. Might aswell do a 6 man at that point...
Not sure why the view of allies got so skewed but theyre a separate entity most of the time. Most people dont have 6 people and split to 2 teams. Its usually you find them on the server and ally up. Or even you pay someone to ally with you 
mercenary style lol
late harness
it wouldnt be the worst thing ever i guess, could just be to raid someone on a server transfer but still
wispy bolt
Not sure why the view of allies got so skewed but theyre a separate entity most ...
allies almost always raid together. Have you played official conquest?
halcyon leaf
allies almost always raid together. Have you played official conquest?
No. But Ive played ASE lol so iknow how it is. But it seems the reason its disabled is from "insiding" problems not raiding together.
Although, I have never experienced that side of alliance in all almost 6000 hours on ASE.
sturdy beacon
Not sure why the view of allies got so skewed but theyre a separate entity most ...
yeh exept you not including the scenerio of going to raid someone w you ally and suddenly you 6v3 that just how it works. it essentially is having 3 more ppl in your tribe minus sharing a base in most cases. though tbh if they allowed allies on this, TF imma just build a joint base w my allys
ppl that r used to playing servers with a higher tribe cap will just use it as a way to increase tribe limit is my point
halcyon leaf
yeh exept you not including the scenerio of going to raid someone w you ally and...
Same can happen in reverse though... you raiding and defenders allys pull and fob your fob and blow u away.
Thats the thing about alliances lol
sturdy beacon
yeh... all of which essentially boils down to it being 6 man
sturdy beacon
if i am a random guy playing ark that doesnt join every discord, plays casual and just joins servers that are near top pop and seem to have good stats. I see 3man. I expect 3 man. not 3 man but 3 more ppl as allies rocking up on you
sturdy beacon
Again.. never had any issue on ASE with alliances. <:ShrugFT:984390339278307358>
yeh there werent issues with alliances on norm official cause there was no tribe cap. it worked differently
with any server that has a tribe cap such as official 6 man, official alliances werent allowed cause everyone would have just played in the grayarea buy having joint bases and raiding together.
stop comparing things that arent very closely related sutiations. u do the same shit in other suggestions too lol.
its called a strawman agruement, just annoying
halcyon leaf
yeh there werent issues with alliances on norm official cause there was no tribe...
I didnt play official. Only unofficial servers where it was 8-10 player caps and still didnt have much issue.
Some people dont do things the same either or want to build their own way or spot. Thats why alliances are good too. Gives people oppurtunity to leave and do their own thing but be able to still help out.
Again... never seen any issue and I have been on BOTH sides of the raid argument. And honestly in ASA pulling up 6v3 may be the way to balance cave raiding 
sturdy beacon
actually it mightve been another guy than u i was thinking of tbh
for the last bit
thick perch
4 people would be great, 3 is very little, and it would make sense to come with friends
halcyon leaf
but yeah i mean everyone complains about online raiding being too difficult so alliances might be the play to making it easier
halcyon leaf
4 people would be great, 3 is very little, and it would make sense to come with ...
Yeah.. for me.. 3 - minimum, 4 is better and 5 is great but they say they cant have 2 5man even tho they had 2 3man and solo/sd are basically the same thing lol
sturdy beacon
any servers with player cap 6 or less has a huge effect compared to anything over 6. numbers are in most cases the most influential part of pvp. the side w more ppl usually wins. i mean comparing 2 man to 3 man server on elite. the online raiding is sooo different. same goes for comparing 3 man to 4 man. it matters most for servers with low player caps. after lets say 8 or so as a player cap the numbers difference doesnt have as much effect so no wonder it was fine on whatever 8-10 man server u used to play on ase
sturdy beacon
Yeah.. for me.. 3 - minimum, 4 is better and 5 is great <:ShrugFT:9843903392783...
solo and SD r not the same lol
hugeeee difference in pvp
halcyon leaf
lol idk i see a lot of solos on SD