When doing the command twice and answering one of the questions, it sends the msg twice

[oak steppe]

lemme see ur code rq

[quaint cradle]

u don't using a filter

[lyric rover]

im tryna make it be like this

[lyric rover]

its not coz of that, and i have a filter

[vast ridge]

it's because you are using the collector in the channel, not the channel. try the check the message.id in the filter?

[lyric rover]

its to do with the collectors

[lyric rover]

how i do that?

[vast ridge]

give me a second to think about it

[lyric rover]

it already is filtering the msg isnt it?

[vast ridge]

let filter = m => m.id === message.id```message being the message your bot is sending

[vast ridge]

what i mean is that your collector is collecting messages in the channel, so by asking two questions you are waiting for two answers, right?

[lyric rover]

yh

[vast ridge]

so what you can do is only check what quesiton is this message answering

wait i'm confuse now

[lyric rover]

same

[vast ridge]

okay i have an idea

[lyric rover]

this problem is so confusing

[vast ridge]

yeah the problem is that questions are overlapping each other in the channel...

so i mean an easy way to fix this is to only allow 1 question per channel

[lyric rover]

yh someone in a dif server said something ab the collectors, lemme check

[lyric rover]

hmm

[vast ridge]

or you can make that if there is multiple questions in a channel, you have to answer using the reply thing

[vast ridge]

(like this)

[lyric rover]

hmm

[lyric rover]

how did this server do it?

[vast ridge]

so that your bot knows which question the user is answering

i guess they ignore the answer if it's not the correct one

[lyric rover]

coz of this

[lyric rover]

yeah thats wut i did except it does the double msg thing if i say the correct answer for either question

[vast ridge]

oh i know why

because you are checking if it's the correct answer in the filter

i think you should check if the message content is the answer or not in the collector, so you should use the collector.on thing instead of awaitMessage I guess?

I don't know if it's the best way to do what you want to do, but if i was my code i would do that 🤔

[lyric rover]

how bout u right 7 and the answer is 7 10 or somethin, and wouldnt it still send it twice

[vast ridge]

idk test it

[lyric rover]

i also realised i can only answer the newer question not the first question

so the new collector overwrites the old one

i think

[spiral garden]

show your code

[lyric rover]

https://sourceb.in/D3gm4UrigF

[smoky salmon]

Hi, not sure if I'm just blind or if you don't initiate quiz (at least not inside the function)

quiz = questions[Math.floor(Math.random() * questions.length)]

It might overwrite quiz everytime you call the function

[lyric rover]

hmm

[smoky salmon]

A simple const quiz = ... should work

[lyric rover]

oh how did i forget to add that lol

i did too much python

[lyric rover]

omg no way

THANK YOU SO MUCH

[smoky salmon]

Lol you're welcome

[lyric rover]

the most smallest mistake was the reason of this whole thing