#vrchat-general-2
1 messages Β· Page 1362 of 1
we snappin in here
yesterday literally everyone said that they do the opposite lul
π€
"Seen: 1:14pm PST"
Listen-
Its like getting a new car each time it happens
Add a discord emote specifically so tupper can mark messages as read
Bans person who made the fix, Devs: βOh yeah we fixed it ! So stop bitching!β
They can't just always tell what they're working on. Sometimes a bug is hard to even see WHY it bugs, let alone to fix it. ;P
coco it's not worth it
I'm trying to keep hope..
you haven't been here yesterday
BRO
there is no hope at all
all hope is lost, panic
Dunno why this is a discussion when both sides always adamantly disagree no matter what xD
Now when will adavnced safety come? -u-
This energy could be spent eating cookies or something yet yall torture yourselves arguing in here xD
Well they banned that mod creator too didnt they? So probably in a week once we βforgetβ about it
Id like to NOT die even when I have a person hidden -u-
I'm eating a kebab while typing
ooo nice
ngl whenever this game bugs or stops working, everyone comes here to insult the mods 
i like kebab gimme
Bubble Tea is amazing btw
I have a question
Is it? What kind of flavors does bubble tea even have?
bubble tea is just tea with candies at the bottom lol
rocks & rocks + sprinkled with more rocks?
that sounds oddly nice
why was a 4 day long bug fix from 3 years ago fixed only now? 
..i figured out why.
i might try that next time i get a chance now lol, bubble tea sounds calming.
They let the community fix it for them-
In 4 days, no less!
vrchat devs sus
We are their slaves uwu
Nuuu its different depending on where you get it
i'd make bubble tea I have the stuff in shops near me, but... It honestly sounds like a hassle for just one drink
I always assumed it was just carbonated tea or something
I love how everyone is trying to change the subject when the devs literally just stole code, banned the creator of said code, and than claim that they fixed the issue without giving the creator of said code credit.
lol i just like tea man wym?
Was the community fix open source?
I know , i jus really like Boba Tea -u-
Just trying to figure this out
Stole code? Where did that come from? How do you even know that happened 
I'm pretty sure most community mods are open source
Yes it was! Open source licenses don't always allow implementation into commercial products, though.
bro, they made caffeinated sparkling water
i chose to talk about what i want to talk about, which right now i am oddly fascinated with bubble tea. π
Were opensource till VRC blackmailed them :)
Because the amount of time to fix a bug in this manor can be the difference between a work around or a rework of current systems to more appropriately fix it (causing a long fix time)
Its a little sus that the mod creator of the 20FPS thing gets banned, and than all the sudden the devs fixed the issue
I see
Also true, although Blackmail is the incorrect term. Extortion is more accurate.
Will you guys give it a damned break?
Nope.
I really don't care if they steal code or anything
no : )
I just want the game to run better
sips bubble tea
they're having a discussion, whats the issue?
a discussion that lasted for 30 hours last time it happened
Coercion is the correct term. And it's very useful in getting people to play by the rules. Totally legit and fair game.
and had multiple people banned because they were dumb
^
Just because you don't like the discussion points doesn't mean they're not valid?
This is a general chat
im just saying though, if vrchat can fix stuff in 4 days shouldnt they be better at doing that
I really honestly wish vrchat had a complaints channel so our bubble tea convo doesnt get derailed by people with an agenda π
this is vrchat-general though not boba-tea-convention
but bubble teaaaaaa ;n;
The discussion relates to the game so it makes sense, so itβs valid
lol im just messin around xD
The jus dont understand Red its okay x3
yay mods are being added into VRChat
@covert chasm Do you know if the devs are going to give proper credit where credit is due for the 20FPS bug? Because its a little sus that the mod creator that made the fix gets banned and than 4 days later the devs are like βThe issue is fixed!β
Yeah. Having a bug be in the game for 2 years, marking it as "Under Review" 1 year in, then going from "In Progress" to "complete" in less than four days, at the same time as a mod which fixes said bug is released? It just seems EXTREMELY fishy, and there is NO way you could spin this to not be suspicious.
Whoah, a booster agreeing with a non booster on this topic, that's a first lol
I don't want to hate on devs too. Just grasping what's happened because these messes are super interesting to me
this is why i didnt actually apply for vrchat
You guys always say Dev's which isn't the people making the decisions. they just implement the code. I really feel the need to make that distinction.
people boost for emote usage in this channel probably (I'd assume in @sharp saddle case at least)
I haven't been saying devs. I've been saying Team. Big distinction there.
interesting where a three year old bug was marked as working on when a mod that fixed it was released
I still haven't used my 2 free boosts anywhere lol
Eh, that and I like the green name. 
Nah man, green name.
Hello π
Yeah green name
This isn't what occurred, and we couldn't use that code if we wanted to. Those modifications are usually (maybe always?) GPLv3 licensed, which prevents us from using it.
I agree that the timing looks a bit odd, but no, it was one of our QA people saying "huh, I think I know how to fix this" a week or so ago, and implementing a fix, testing it, discovering it worked, and slipping it into the next patch. That's all.
Then you are not who i was talking to specifically and you are wording things correctly, so thank you for that. π
I'm positive you'll choose to disbelieve that, though. D:
It is sus though
do you sleep
Is your team willing to audit the fix to make sure code wasn't taken? Because it still definitely seems suspicious.
Uh huh ... aside from the first part, you werent told how to respond right? (Just curious)
How about a way to change into a default avi while in VR? Instead of having to use the website or using the keyboard
there were like 5 mods talking about 12 hours ago
i think i know how that guy figured out how to fix it πΎ
No? You do realize that I am the person that writes pretty much all of VRChat's communications, right? That's me. I'm the guy. π
guess so
I even had a nice conversation with Momo lol
Fair enough.
Also, minor nitpick - no one here is a Mod. Devs, sure. π
well, tupper isn't TECHNICALLY a dev anymore, innit?
Hypothetically could you use something if it was licensed in a way that was convenient, for example, wtfpl?
im sure authors would be more than happy to give special permission and edit the liscence
The idea that management makes most of the devs decisions isn't that true in most companies btw
yes but βΉοΈ
Uh, I was a dev the moment I got hired as a support person, and I'm still a dev now π€
very funny now give me the user tag that makes the funny jokes
Sure they have a lot of control over the project as a whole but for specifics it comes down to leads
didn't you say you stopped being part of the dev team π€
in 2018
no???
what did you stop doing in 2018 then for the vrc team
what do you develop, turmoil?
OOF.
The distinction is important. "mod/moderator" implies a role we do not have. Developer is both more accurate, and true. π
Typically anyone that is on the team that develops a product like VRChat is referred to as a "dev"
that is a staff not a dev
also tupper has the chat mod role π€
Staff works too 
.. I mean, that's like how industry typically uses the nomenclature
you're free to make up how you wanna use it if you like i suppose
Not really true either. Where I work our community managers also get referred to as devs
You guys are being so pedantic. Devs are the staff of a videogame company.
It can be both
i choose to believe "dev" actually means "DEVO", the 80s synthwave band
whip it
look, just called them yellow named people lol
ehhh that implies something else
eh
if youre taking years old requests can you guys fix viewpoint drift when lying down please
meh
yeh
whip it good duhnuhnuhnuhnuh
Cheesybois.
simpsons or simps
π
cheese
well aware of it, its on my personal "i hate this bug and want it fixed" list, has been there a long time
minions!
the main issue with this is that this new update and the mod fix it the same way :/
Yeah cause their QA guy cheesed a bug that lasted for two plus years in only 4 days
grouups :P @covert chasm
that too 
heh
tuπ
±οΈπ
±οΈer is the entire team cats

Even though I do not believe the code was stolen, the method to fix it almost most certainly was. This is a really really bad look after you ban the person who discovered how to fix it.
Some day, ppl will realize Tupper and Pill are the only real ppl on the team, and the rest of us are their alts
sketchy
yes
no you're cats
π±
π
Hey VRChat peeps, ty for bringing such an great platform for us all to enjoy together! 
there's a difference between patching a bug and fixing it. Many user-submitted fixes in open source projects could be considered band-aids and not an actual clean fix that can/should be used
This is many peoples' exact view on the issue.
Well anyway, before we beat the horse dead again, @covert chasm You can say whatever you want, but its still RRRREEEEEEAAAAALLLLLLLYYYYYY sus that the team was able to fix something so quick, after a fix was made (regardless of it was used or not), you can say whoever from QA was like βoh !β But the fact the issue on canny was in there for 2 years, and than sooooooo quickly fixed 4 days after a user is banned for fixing it really makes you think.
is pill even active anymore lol
yea, i did hang with him last night
Very active! But busy with all the things.
pill is yes.
Hey Tupper, I was wondering if there are plans to give us a roadmap or something of things to come this year? It would be nice to see a bit more transparency on what you guys are working on.
You're all doing a great job though so keep it up! I look forward to whatever you all have cooking up
yes please roadmaps and deadlines
hey vrchat team i want to tell you that i know that you are cats
Roadmaps can be tough, as they put timers on things we're not comfortable putting timers on just yet-- but we do them when we can, which isn't super often 
All mute catgirls are secretly VRChat devs on alts, taking down names
roadmaps would be nice
what about mute femboys
shhh quit outing us 
damn
no
youre a cat
would give us hope that things might get better
That's fair enough, thanks for the reply ^^
We are always, always working on things to make VRChat better. Just assume that's always true of our roadmap. lol
Just woke up to see the patchlog. Real coincidence with the click bug mmmmmh
I like trains.
nonono ant
aaaa dies because of train
I got some great conspiracies. Like how they don't fix the UI because they don't want FBT people laying around and not beta testing.
π
is it 2006 again
Ooh spicy
i have a conspiracy
vrchat team is comprised of cats
gucci maine?
Don't want to see seem pushy but any info on the loading screen/avatar 100% loading softlock bug? (coming from someone who's seen it more often than they'd like)
Personally, I feel like if the developers, QA testers, or any part of the VRChat team takes any sort of inspiration from any community content, then that community content should be credited in some way. That's all. And because of the timing of this bug fix, I'm still inclined to believe inspiration was taken from the modder's work.
????
heres a conspiracy, VRC Team is just too good.
yall need to add a laying play to the standing and seated play options so i can look forward without breaking my neck in bed
bruh cant login...again :/
@covert chasm This may seem loaded, but like, no response to this?

you got a VRChat account, or a steam account?
When I open the Steam Overlay, I'm still seeing my resolution drop. Not by as much, maybe just like 2x2 pixels now. Is this normal?
You've stated the same point no less than 3 times just today, it's already been responded to.
Could be steam authentication server problems again.
I mean, I'd like to believe that the devs do sometimes tend to just have random EUREKA! moments to old, unsolved issues
for those getting mad about the click thingy, here's the response from the mod author: https://i.imgur.com/2HXoaN3.png
pretty sure steamvr does this to reduce perf usage in overlay
He literally said that they didn't use the mods code. They used their own code to solve the problem
you can believe what happened all you want though but it doesn't make it a reality nor a fact, none of you know if any of this stuff was stolen or they just decided to fix it 
that's how I had it with RPGs I play at least
I mean, what do you want me to say? I'll give you the truth, but you're going to choose to disbelieve it, which is why I wasn't responding.
No, "inspiration" from another source was not taken. Code was not taken. The fix was implemented because someone said "oh right, I hate this bug, I wonder if I can fix it", and they did. That's it. That's the story. D: Not exciting, I know, but that's how it goes.
It does, but as I understood it, VRChat removed it in an update
vrchat team
do you agree that cats can have a little salami
wtf
Hey guys, i need help with something. I got banned from a VRchat world for talking about another world that an admin didn't like, even though in their rules it never said that i couldn't talk about it. I believe i was wrongfully banned for having an opinion, can anyone help with this?
Yes, but I thought recent changelog said that was removed. It was modofied. it's not as blocky. but it's still dropping a little
do i have to force vrchat developers to suffer from their own bugs before they fix it then
I actually had no idea a mod existed that addressed it. If it came out recently, yeah, sure, I can see why that appears odd.
As I said, I don't believe it was stolen. However, I don't believe a QA guy simply had an epiphany either. I believe there's more to the story that Tupper and the team are either unwilling or unable to tell us.
well do you
?π
heres the response from the author: https://i.imgur.com/2HXoaN3.png
Cough ComfyVR
There isn't.
The real story honestly is that boring. Sorry it isn't action-movie crazy.
i just want this game to not force me to keep upgrading my pc 2018 on a low end pc i could be in a world with 20+ people no frame drop. today in the same situation with a way beefier pc i sit at 30 to 40 in vr.
honestly the game got more demanding for me the day they added the vr cameras update.
Again you can believe that all you want but this will not be a reality, between your belief and what the qualified team member has to say i think i would rather go with a qualified team member that knows how their team works 
Darn thing about conspiracies - proof of their nonexistence is usually just internalized as proof of their existence.
That hashtag on Twitter is so dumb rn though, why cant people just stay Vanilla?
ok time to use jank content as demonstration after events
Is there any possibility of VAC being added to VRC?
I have always felt that account bans don't do much in free to play games.
i have a conspiracy
you and all other members of the team are cats
wouldn't doubt it at this point
Again, like I said-- I can deliver the truth, but you'll choose to disbelieve. I can't help you. 
that isn't what you said last night
@sharp saddle the bonfires have been lit again
what if
There's not really more than one way to fix a bug
Finding out how to fix something, right after someone else does, truely pure actionmovie fantasy.
for some reason i think your caps lock is very worn out and the writing is faded
helm's deep needs our help
coincidence is a bitch
Galaxy brain
essentially you gave us a legal way of saying, that they did use the mods
I'm being only slightly hyperbolic , you know what I mean π
rak im murdering you
question
what was the inspiration of giving vrchat+ a mascot thats a cat wearing a cardboard box
they're goin to space
go ahead
Uh
they looked at the mods and figured out how to fix the issue and boom, they fix it with no acknowledgement of the mod that lead to the fix in the first place
this guy is obsessed with cats
are you sure the cardboard box will protect them
That isn't essentially, nonessentially, or even implied as true in his statement.
There would be no issue with seeing the mod, and implementing the fix. The issue is this is right after disrespecting the people who did figure it out, and banning them. (I know you are not mods, but you are in the org)
IT is though
it will protect them from cardboard space, yes
Well, the thing is, modding is clearly against TOS.
Can you confirm or deny the VRChat cat is a VRCat
What if the space was the cardboard, what will you do then
cardboard is only the strongest material known to man
You aren't likely to thank/acknowledge someone for breaking your rules.
Oh I actually have a question for the VRC team about account merging (Steam to VRC account). Documentation on what is and isn't kept from the Steam account over to the VRC account is conflicting. idk if this is the right place to ask and I don't wanna post a paragraph but is there someone who could clarify what is/isn't saved in the merge?
@covert chasm Any plan about official hooks for client-side only mods?
well, they actually do want that from what I'm getting out of this convo :^)
just as much as you can have a confirmation bias take on something that didn't happen.
but at least in his case he is a qualified team member 
Then they shouldnt be looking at the mods themselves lul
well yes, but VRC doesn't want modders
it's their game, they do with it as they please
Tl;dr everything gets moved if the account is fresh, if you used a part of the system it wont transfer that part.
And no one is allowed to protest?
Everything possible is transferred. The transfer doesn't occur if there's anything on the VRC account-- so if you have an avatar saved on the VRC account, avatars aren't transferred. This isn't true for friends-- the friend lists are merged.
This is why you should use a brand new, blank VRC account for merging.
lol you guys have been "protesting" for mods for 3 years and nothing has changed
just me remembering to come back here and enjoy the show every few months
But that's simply how business works, you always follow what the contenders and "people against you" are doing
basically, its against ToS since it can and is sometimes used maliciously
that is not how things change
Yes, modders who fix game issues are clearly the adversaries.
Not all mods can be used maliciously, but it does create a bad scenario when it does
I didn't say modders couldn't protest.
I just said they can't really get mad and expect acknowledgement from a platform that is actively trying to get rid of them.
well, with the current ToS, they are, yes
i think people should be allowed to provide working code examples the devs can study to test fixes and push them to open beta
part of me wishes we could revert versions and start over cause there was a time where this game ran flawlessly for the most part
For the most part, i agree, but its one of those unfortunate scenarios where i thing its hurting the people who love the game and do support it, rather than the people who are using it in an evil capacity
And the root of the issue at hand is that this banwave only affected modders creating explicitly non-malicious mods.
Yup
Using unoffiical mods in any application that has a username/password login is foolish tbh
they probably are via canny, I'd assume so? need to hear from Tupper on that one
yeah
hmm okay. So if there is an avatar and/or world playlist saved on the VRC account, can I just delete those from the account and it gets considered a blank account again, or is the "damage already done" so to speak?
That is not true, at all.
vrchat threatened the creator of melon/loader btw
Melon loader could be used to inject all sorts of harmful stuff into the game.
meon loader isn't only used for vrc
problem, that i've seen in my few years of being on VRChat, the canny seems to have plenty of good ideas, but it usually sits on the canny for what seems like months if not years
It breaks VRC's terms of service.
because devs are either busy with other stuff or simply have no clue how to implement it at the moment
No one is really mad. Maybe at first it was a bit frustrating, understandably, but we all knew this would happen. There's a reason pretty much everyone complied. Though one person did get the short end of the stick without a chance to remove their content as far as I'm aware.
That loader is simply a generalized tool, used for many Unity games. However, the MOdding Group discord whose mods were wiped was explicitly against any and all malicious modding of the game, and banned any mentions.
helloooo
I symapthize with the guy, but ultimately, TOS is TOS whether you like it or not.
for the most part it's just a very risky thing and very unstable.
modding implementation is not always having well done code and always running a risk of having infected code or it breaking in the future updates which would require for it to be updated.
I don't think you'd want people putting bad name on your game because of dangerous files being spread around by client modification.
VRC literally had records of accounts being stolen in some cases because some client were actually infected
It's just too much risk and company wouldn't want to deal with stuff like that
and its not just about the canny. like if people could collaborate on fixes and literally spoonfeed working solutions to the developer they can just push to open beta, experiment, and have a lot less to deal with
because most of the games that accept mods are not ONLINE-ONLY games
I sent this to someone last night-- its my personal viewpoint, doesn't represent VRChat, but still wanna post it because I think it'll both answer questions and get people to misquote it and pull it out of context dozens of times over the next 12 hours. π
I can't really provide justification for any particular part of our ToS other than "thems the rules".
However, I can probably assume that we don't want people making modifications to our code because they have to run through our servers, interact with our community, and we don't want people doing things to our services or our community members that we don't control.
On top of that, modding code isn't vetted, so who knows what its doing to your PC. We've seen tons (TONS) of "nonmalicious" mods steal account info (or worse).
Finally, VRChat isn't exactly Skyrim, Minecraft, or etc. We run the services, and its all one big universe. A better analogy than those games would be like... hacking FF14's UI to get a better inventory page. Sure, you can do it, but rest assured that Squeenix would swing that hammer, fast and hard.
As an aside, assuming we had some kind of "mod vetting" program, that'd mean we'd have to pay engineers (expensive, skilled people!) to analyze code of new modifications and any updates, have a way to distribute them, and have an API that would allow them access-- all things we don't have, and don't really think is in the best interest to do.
We realize why people do these things-- there's features and fixes they want, and they want NOW. However, this is kinda my personal perspective on why this kind of thing isn't permitted.
they banned creators of qol mods though
someone tried to use terraria as an example lol
12 hours is a bold claim, 20 hours give or take
Modding code is vetted, that's the entire purpose of one community. Outside of stuff published there, can't say.
github is a whole different platform
"On top of that, modding code isn't vetted, so who knows what its doing to your PC. We've seen tons (TONS) of "nonmalicious" mods steal account info (or worse)." yeah but you banned creators of open source mods
And for the last time... it breaks their TOS... and allows loading of malicious code into their game...
I understand it also does other things...
Still against TOS
They have only stopped the good side of modding lul.
its universal.. you cant enforce your power on github
Hi! Also, vetted by people we haven't vetted, therefore has inherited not-being-vetted-ness.
everyone in one of the modding communities was banned for distributing malicious mods although none of their mods were malicious specifically because malicious mods werent allowed to begin with
btw @covert chasm as a FFXIV player myself, The FFXIV part is actually a bit incorrect
Untrue, they have banned/detected plenty of malicious mods.
in FFXIV you don't get caught for mods at all if you don't expose yourself about it
Your team banned the people who were vetting the mods, too, Tupper.
melonloader is not malicious nor a mod?
the current thing being discussed rn is a banwave of a bunch of creators of qol mods
The amount of disinformation floating around about VRC and the impact of modding is staggering.
cause they simply don't hunt people for mods
Well yeah, if a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it...
melonloader can be malicious, it just isnt always
yes it can
Hay guys I just wanted to know I made a mod for Left 4 Dead 2 back in 2010 that replaces Ellis with Krystal Fox am I still gonna get banned
its the people using melonloader...
melonloader isnt even like... just for vrchat
why not reach out to them to like.. allow some option for melon to be usedd in a safe manner
so it seems ridiculous that vrchat went after it
Same voice?
It is for all Unity games
Just as a point of contention, the "ripper mod" that's popular at the moment utilizes MelonLoader to hook into VRC.
So..
It's more that, perfect example that had big drama with it was the ACT (Advanced Combat Tracker), literally everyone who raids uses it, OPENLY, but they only ban people if they bring it up in the chat
you need 0 mods to rip things from vrchat tho
Hello! Fair enough, that's completely understandable. Thanks for clarifying that. π
until one day YoshiP finally said "ok ACT is allowed"
maybe hire said community, have them vet and you get everything vetted.
Documenting and providing official hooks for clientside modifications doesn't sound too outlandish tho
Yes but that doesn't mean that they had to target the good creators
You do realize you do not need to mod your game to grab avatars. You can literally do it through the website itself
Want to not be banned?
Just don't break TOS.
A mod like that basically does the same thing
you don't even need to hire us, we will volunteer it.
This is true
^
XD
Hiring someone is how we vet them. 
well ez fix then
There is no good and bad, it's a simple as "you broke the TOS"
It's like saying "I shouldn't go to jail because i stole something from someone for helping out others" you stole something that's it - end of story 
Assuming I know what you're referring to, it uses a modified version of MelonLoader that will not be effected by the current takedown.
This is also true. If there's people willing to do it for free already, it's not gonna cost VRChat that much money
they made me sing in my interview π¦
So from what im reading and from what im understanding you all should be pissed off that you cant walk into a business without a shirt. the business said "hey, its our rule you cant be in here with a shirt off, you're no longer allowed into the store" that would make sense right? then why is vrchat banning modders, something that is against their rules, so polarizing? its the same concept
They are saying they don't require payment.
You do, and that's correct
the fuck why?
pay them in donuts
What song did you pick?
half the devs are "picked" from the community, only real example I know is Euan, but he explained it perfectly how he got in
the only mods being taken down rn are like qol stuff
the one true song - Wrecking Ball
Had another lovely experience of two kids exclaiming that I was a furry and to βkill itβ. What a way to live.
Clearly they have the voice of an angel, since they got hired. x3
@covert chasm Dont think anyone here is asking for offical recognition but what was the rational with purposly going after the ones who were vetting and creating ethical guidelines for mods?
oh no
staff was like... uh global dynamic bones? fuck you
You are breaking TOS yourself.
lmao I like your style.
you're missing the fucking point bro. the keyword is M O D. MODS are banned, regardeless of their objective
there are ways to vet without hiring
If you've ever heard me, you might actually believe that. π
"We have vetted ourselves and found that we have done no wrong"
Yeah but stealing affects somebody regardless: loss of money.
Good modding doesn't.
it doesnt matter what it does, its a mod, and its against their rules, cry about it
Those are actioned, removed, taken down, etc as often as possible.
you can rip avatars without a mod, it's in the very files of the game
If we run into each other in VRC I expect an instant solo concert π
oh shit here we go again
it's against tos regardless, that's the rule
fact
Youll be disappointed, I promise
So.... it took them 2 years to finally say βyeah I hate this nowβ and than magically have an idea to fix it? Idk dude.
@sharp saddle just making sure you're not missing out
yes sir
i remember people told me they used to rip stuff out of the unencrypted cache they store, didnt require mods
can you calm down about that please. the author dun give a shit.
i wanna hear them vocals
That's my line
i can understand banning mods made for vrchat, but threatening melon loader's creator
is funny
And it shouldn't. We're just asking them to change the ToS to say "Don't create malicious mods". All it takes is adding one word.
I mean I did say that you were going to choose to disbelieve, and... well
Wasn't really a threat, but a request.
then it gets hard to define the word βmaliciousβ
the funny thing is the author doesnt really care at this point. its the users that are getting mad on his behalf
(maybe if you unban him (loukylor#0001) he can help quell this a bit ;))
his account was held at ransom
imagine being angry because you did something that was a clear violation of terms of service
This would mean they endorse using good mods, which would expose users to risk running them in general like catching a virus or whatever other stuff that can happen
i mean the creator doesnt have to be pissed, the users would be since they use said mods XD
Crashing, stealing, credential hacking. A simple "bug fix" and "IK fixer" is NOT malicious at all, even for a reasonable n00b to figure out
instead of putting your energy into the chat can you guys fix the audio bug i hate having to restart my game all the time
Club Mika breaks tos too
It was, at the very least, coersion, and at the worst, extortion.
Everyone's was, not really the correct term though. Violation of the VRChat ToS warrants this kind of action. Is what it is.
Completely incorrect
yeah why not crack down on the other things breaking tos as well
sure but VRChat itself also has the risk of viruses
You can't enforce that on another platform... Let alone for an universal tool
Same shit different day
They don't have to "endorse" anything. They can just leave the non-malicious ones alone.
Sorry, but it's way deeper than this.
Not really
yes it is
That's power abuse guys. I support vrc through plus.. This bahaviour is not acceptable
Their initial response should have pointed to the exact files they wanted changed/removed, certainly. Not just the entire repo. But I believe they corrected themselves on that.
The issue still stands, this is a big fuck you to the modders with no acknowledgement of the work they have done to improve your game no credit given, instead of working with modders in a sanctioned manner, for example... employing them, that way they aren't breaking tos, instead you blackmail them into deleting their git hubs so they can be unbanned. And when patchnotes come out with a fix that heavily resembles what a mod provided, you can't help but see some kind of connection there that the work modders are doing is being stolen, either copy and pasted, or being looked at, examined, and reverse engineered to fix the main issue in the client. Because here is the problem, our only source of knowledge is the dev team, and when there has already been a lack of transparency, it makes it hard to believe anything being said in the first place, so going on about how we disbelief the truth, it was brought on by your own faults. Not just tupper, but several chat moderation and devs adding fuel to the fires, whilst mostly unintentional, it doesn't help. This could have been handled better in every way, yet devs and moderation are digging in their heels and dying on their hill.
actually you guys i'm fine with the banning of mods if you get rid of kids
they have, they said they wanted all references of vrchat gone from it
This is a dumb argument, they are a company. They have a job, they literally will lose income and trust by doing this. They risk not getting the job in the future for a stupid action like this...
What's on there that belongs to vrc?
Thats being a bit extreme, we are just talking about an account here. VRChat is well within their right to ban accounts for any reason including no reason as per their TOS.
"blackmail: the action, treated as a criminal offense, of demanding payment or another benefit from someone in return for not revealing compromising or damaging information about them."
that's out of the question, especially with quest being a playable platform
I'm surprised how nice the Dev team is being actually, they have the ability to ban everyone who even uses a client and they would be in the right because you literally broke the ToS you agreed to.
yall are dumb as hell lol
Just to single out a point here: do you know how blackmail is legally defined?
but their tos says you gotta be older than 13
except no its literally not, everyoens throwing a shitfit because people got banned for doing something they shouldnt have. sure the melonloader thing is a crock of shit but they reserve the right to ban anyone off their platform for breaking terms of service, its not my fault people are too sped to comprehend that
Mhm, so pointless to discuss any "threats". Mistakes were made, people made up for it, only thing is to roll with it and move on.
and allowed more customization and the features that mods provide, then phasing them out.
all i want is the audio glitch to be fixed
I mean, idk how difficult it is to see what im seeing from all this, do you not agree that it is really sus?
and? facebook ToS says you have to be 13+, I have a facebook account since 10 years old
Frog
please let me change my ui color tupper
so i can feel ok with resubbing to VRC+
its dum cuz im on the modding side but we dont get anywhere because people keep kicking the point into the floor
Yeah honestly seems like a spit in the face to their community
Is vrc rolling back their statement to that dev?
being slightly hyperbolic with that wording
In that case.. Cool
oh there has been several companies that have pushed viruses, Sony anyone?
that would mean that it is fine to use them if they are not restricted therefore more users will recommend them with an argument that "it's allowed" and at some point things like that are just bound to happen. hell it's already a thing,
my friend was banned and all he made was a mod that allowed eye tracking to be read as animator params
tupper i'll buy you red lobster if you can let me make my ui pink
Maybe don't. It doesn't support your point to be hyperbolic.
Rip eyetracking :(
Sure, I can definitely see how it might appear suspicious, but I'm telling you that isn't what happened. I'm not sure what you think me lying about it would gain me. 
The conversation continued, but that remains private.
More headaches, I guess
neither does it when the chat mods and dev team are aswell
tupper. red lobster biscuits. all for you. pink ui please
There was a creator banned that made the Index thumb position a parameter as well, a mod specifically designed for Sign Language
Before, you had said that someone in QA figured it out, meaning you do not know how they figured it out.
Hordini sounds like an important time to be a bit transparent about itm people.. Are rightfully a little upset at this
the same one actually @vale pecan
why am i surprised to see that this dumb mod discussion is still going from last night
Yes they can but if they do than at least the correct way. The malicious ones will still roam around after they banned the harmless ones. That's partly even worse since there is no protection now against the malicious ones.
Oh right vrchat hates sign language n the deaf.
And VRChat can just ignore it and focus on the bigger problems at hand that they actually have to focus on. As of right now, they don't have their priorities straight
take a painkiller, and a nap, you deserve it
no headache
Behind close doors is a lil sus
Actually quick question, am I able to use outside emojis if I boost? I use 'em so much for expression it's hard not to.
@ivory thunder can you please drop the clickfix thing. the author doesnt care and has directly said to not get mad for his behalf

it's not continuing, there was like 10 hours of peace
This stuff goes on for a few days to a week every banwave, then people stop bitching and realize they dont need mods to play a game about talking lol
me, personally? no, I can see the source and it was a pretty simple fix. just hadn't gotten looked at in a long time because there's always something else bigger up on the list
well love the fact that malicious mod users are going to be having a field day :v
it started like an hour ago again
then anothe crops up a few months, maybe half a year later. rinse. repeat.
but yeah, someone said "ok, i hate this" and took it upon themselves to fix it, out of the normal production order
sigh Here we go again - chat is again on the rampage...
sometimes happens
the facebook group has become a cancer cell too
I only did the same thing tupper has been doing #vrchat-general-2 message
so they fixed it, tested it, passed it into the queue
Well, not you personally Tupper
its a hive mind of idiots
it got pushed into this patch, so now its out and you can benefit from it
Ignore the most possibly dangerous source where the virus can come from? At any point the mod dev can just decide to put something bad in the code when they feel like it no matter for how long the mod was "good"
It was a simple fix, but sometimes things like that are hard to track down, which the mod creator had. The issue is the timing, right after banning.
The timing was unfortunate, but a fix is a fix.
yeah
why there no community suggested patches then with working solutions that the devs can read and try to understand, like vrchat canny but with code demonstrations
tupper, gib hug β€οΈ
hordi can u say that i dc about the clickfix thing cuz ppl dont seem to listen to me
out of curiosity, have you gotten any death threats in ur dms yet since the banwave or do you keep your dms closed nowadays lul
Nothing wrong with the fix, or that it was from a mod.
yep, it can be. I'm telling you that I understand that the timing was oddly coincidental, but that's it-- coincidence. Like.. I'm just gonna repeat it over and over.
Oh no. Not this again.
Imagine thinking game devs dont get death threats daily as part of normal operations.
Website friendslist still broken π Lemme spy on my friends π
didnt they.. literally just push an update that fixed bugs?
well, I just assume Tupper gets like 10x the normal amount
like I said, whether it is unintentional, but most of us find it hard to believe how these fixes are only now being implemented when modders have fixed them for a while now and they are only now being added after modders are being banned, look at the 20 fps fix, that was mod in which the modder recently also got banned and boom fixed in the client, it is fucking sus.
At least it's fixed now, whatever if a mod did fix it too recently
I feel so very sorry for you.
tupper can i borrow your minifridge
Then VRChat would take down the creator.
Not to mention there is a group dedicated to verifying each mod update and the integrity of them. They should be allowed to work with VRChat.
But you do not know it is coincidence, because you do not know how the QA person figured it out.
How do I add a custom character without playing for an hour
dont stress tupper, it aint werf
its his job
and you dont know the reverse, sooo...
hwaht so people complain when they dont fix things. then complain when they fix things?
he gets paid
did i ask you
Please drop the ClickFix argument. The creator has made a statement.
i told him not to stress

Initially done by a mod first, but if it inspired them to tackle the issue on their own, then all the better.
That or just some crazy timing for a 3 year old issue to be addressed by both sides at the same time. Either way, this discussion has happened so many times in the past few days, no need to continue it.
you're in a public server lol
At this point I want to imagine that he's having fun partly because he can make fun of people professionally lul
can't
buy vrc+
but this is not much of ignoring then is it? You are basically saying act upon things once the damage is done instead of preventing the damage from happening in the first place
That's dumb...
Ok
it's to stop people immediately uploading malicious avatars
Yeah, I wasn't being sarcastic in that message.
his job isnt to stress over idiots spamming his chat over someone breaking the rules and being dealt with
it takes more like 10 hours tho to get to new user
even if the code isn't ripped line for line, the chance that it is a coincidence is unlikely
Just spend time on the game, no need to rush avatar creation.
Sarcasm doesn't translate through text, apologies. π
yes it's dumb not to have every jackass who gets on right away to be able to upload whatever they want from the getgo
yall know how bug bounties work, i know its usually for more severe concerns like security breaches in google, but if there was a bug bounty thing for vrchat that wasnt paid, and explains bugs and how the devs can fix that it can help a lot
he's responding to criticism. He literally doesn't have to talk if he doesn't want to.
But also for the people arguing for ClickFix, the mod creator doesn't want that to continue.
ok
He's community manager though. His job is literally communicating with the community. He's getting paid for that.
Even a simple tag on the profile that's something like $isHelper = true as a reward for bug bounties
Well like I said, there's a group dedicated to making and publishing safe mods and verifying them before published. They verify before updates are published too. I'm just saying that the one central "safe mods" location doesn't need to be shot down.
that's sort of what canny is for, but i believe they just need time to get to fixing certain things
community manger doesn't necessarily have to interact with the community 24/7
yes but he doesnt need to be stressed over it you sped
Ruby client is much more invasive
blogposting is more what a community manager does, keeping the community up-to-date with stuff
can we ban kids yet
honestly though mods are also a way to support hardware vrc is unlikely or slow to support
Reverse engineering makes sense, especially if the fix couldn't be figured out and you hear a mod creator did, you would want to look at that open source mod to see how they did it. It makes your job easier and lets you learn, but when this is done after these mod creators are banned and essentially spat on, it just doesn't look good.
ehhhhhhhhhhhhh
like vive eye or face tracking.
community manager's job is to manage a community, not to bend to their whim
or at the very least people shouldnt be banned from the canny for providing code samples
Sped? If that's some weird insult than pls stop talking. I'm not insulting you either
Or bHaptics.
I mean, google for "what does a community manager do" and you'll find dozens of articles all of which are slightly wrong in various ways
i have my right to speak thank you π
Having been a community manager for 6 years - no, it's more like 5 jobs in one: content creation, authoring, PR, and (company depending) video production/distribution.
CMs do different things depending on the communities they manage
I could go on the reasons for it to be very unsafe as well but i would prefer to stop it here tbh.
i do not envy tupper
This
Not if you insult people
A Community Manager's role can vary depending on the community
You LITERALLY told someone to stop talking to you because you didn't speak to them directly lmao
and who are you to take my rights, lmao
CM is a title that will be completely different between communities
don't use sped like that, that is not ok
CMs are hydras that fill a lot of roles all at once. Takes finesse and patience. π
Code samples should never be posted to the Canny, they should be sent directly to the moderation team, labeled as an exploit report.
stop being rude
no i didnt? I said i didnt ask, read much?
And unfortunetly they often are the ones at the butt-end of most of the community's jokes or frustruation, seeing as they often become a public face.
if you want to scream at each other like monkeys go into DMs
you actually don't lol, this is a service owned by a private business
monke
Well yeah, I've never been a community manager myself so I don't know the exact details, but it's just more or less what I imagined it to be, blogposting and content creation are the same imo
but it still doesn't mean community managers should be interacting with their communities 24/7 with individuals who are thicker than a castle wall unlike certain ppl want them to (which is what I wanted to point out to ppl saying "OMG tupper community manager! he responsible!!!!!")
It's against the server rules. The same as you say modding is against tos soo
Makes sense for security issues. But regular bugs probably doesn't matter
what about for bug reports that have been community fixed? same?
but isnt most of the taxing on the player itself ?
and i dont see any moderators or admins telling me to stop talking π
for once we got the devs to talk in a group like that
we don't need angry kids just yelling
maybe put a toggle on it just like dynamic bones?
It's Spring Break
It's quiet at work lmao
The problem I see with doing that is they can attach an account to that if itβs an exploit and just permanently remove them from the community for wanting an issue fixed
ban the kids and you solve two problems at once
Mhm you see that happening way too much unfortunately π
Gotta love when people get made a Tupper for an update, makes no sense. Can't tell people people are joking or serious anymore lol.
Modifications are not made to original source, and usually aren't useful to post the decompiled/hooked-in fix for, but I don't see any issue in sending that as a report as well?? I guess? Just, again, don't post on the Canny
No one is ever going to be banned for making a good-faith report. Ever.
its like that one meme where the guy puts a piece of wood in his bike and he falls over and hes like "damn obama did this"
wAIT THEY FIXED THE LOW FPS CAPSULE SELECTING BUG really?? That was one of the most annoying issues in my experience
anyone having problems playing videos in worlds since new update? "Invalid url" for everyone tried
I think they were more talking about code samples for fixing issues or new additions, do you not want them posted to the canny aswell? Should they also be sent to the moderation team?
loll obama memes are the best. specially the one where its literally obama saying godamnit obama
yeah well I have that one friend that got banned once so it's true
i have no proof to back it up but dozens of people reported it ||/s you never know.||
well sure but the thing is it makes it very easy to implement especially in cases where its a simple problem as a result of doing something improperly or mis managing a resource or whatever. this can also involve content integration such as in the case of eye tracking
I'm surprised nobody's asked about mods that translates the UI in their native language
@vocal shard if you gonna say to everyone that they should stop breaking tos than begin to follow server rules by stopping to insult others
doesnt vrc already have localization?
yeah imagine them fixing the click bug right after a clickfix mod came out. speedrun
youre gonna give me an ulcer, svel.
Nope, absolutely not. As long as an exploit is reported responsibly and is not used maliciously by the person reporting it, then I'll personally fight for people to not get actioned for reporting.
Let me reiterate: we want exploit reports. However, as soon as that reporter uses that exploit for their own gain or to act maliciously, that little bit of immunity disappears.
#vrchat-general-2 message shus about that
Because you're being a hypocrite right now
no not really
make sense
Nope. English only. There's guides in different languages that the community has made however
so if i were to write a fix for something or add support for something i wouldnβt be banned for sending that email..? 
saying that people are idiots, because they refuse to accept that people got banned for breaking tos of vrchat, doesnt relate to calling you an idiot for having an assbackwards opinion
I'm half Japanese and wanted to try out the Japanese version of VRChat... Only to realize there's no option to switch languages
would need translators there since vrc wonβt community source localization
I said "exploit report", specifically.
You said i am a sped. Don't know what that is but i guessed some insult. I already asked but you didn't answer to that.
it just sounds like you're butthurt because you cant use your unfriendly mods π€·ββοΈ
I don't care if people got banned for TOS breaking, but tbh that strongholding mod tool developers for the unity mod tool itself, and the treatment towards the more passive side of modders is def a slap in the face to a huge amount of people, while malicious clients run free and now the passive ones may use the more aggressive ones since their current is being attacked.
Sped = Special Education so yeahhhh
I already said i didnt agree with them pissing on melonloader
Not replying to you.
Melonloader is not a vrchat exclusive loader.
ui translations into different languages when
how come it seems like everyones argument here is that removing the safe mods is suddenly gonna bring more people to bad mods and have those overtake the game. does anyone have like.. a single bit of evidence or data to make that claim?
This is why most of us are upset too, @covert chasm I know you cant say much about it, but like dont you agree its a little immoral
If you don't care then don't add to your side of the "Argument"
just helping for some that might get confused
Youβre good π
if you actually require people to provide evidence the entire convo would be much quieter π
yeah pretty much
We action malicious modifications as often as we possibly can. They're just far less visible when we do so.
Not what im asking
i can do as i please thank you
until i see moderator on your name, you hold no authority over me
im just glad theyre not literally banning everyone on modding servers for now
Then your argument has no valid point for my side if you wanna ignore everyone who doesn't agree with you.
So "do what you see fit" and I will as well.
He's just being toxic
wasnt ignoring you, you're the one that said you werent resonding to me
so looking back, blackmail wasn't the right word, extortion is.
Nep's back.
The passive ones won't be getting more aggressive. Most, if not all, mod creators complied and removed their repositories. We do what we can, but aggression isn't the answer.
Not saying you guys
B
Yes there is evidence for it but i dont have it at hand, however lets assume some 20% of the playerbase has always used mods, ive personally seen way less ppl in public be malicious now in 2020/2021 then in 2018 when i started playing, That would be an indication more ppl have switched to friendly mods, if they get rid of those then logic goes ppl would go back to using not so friendly mods.
I mean the people who use them, might because without a direct source now, they may turn to more malicious mods that haven't been taken down.
I trust you guys not to hurt anyone.
So would that be "Support Request" for contact type then "Technical/Application Support" from support category and "Exploit Report" as the subject? Not really seeing any other choices?
also not true - extortion is explicitly implied to imply obtaining something, especially money, through force or threats.
but do you actually have evidence for how many people use mods? π otherwise your view is always going to be biased

im not saying it to be mean, but to be clear
I'd probably submit it to the Moderation team, tbh, just choose the standard "report" reason.
aight
hurt anyone doing what? its a game
well the largest modding discord has 42k members, the other 35k
thats still not what im asking but sure
for example, i can say that discord servers are notorious for having a lot of inactive members
Yes I do, it is about 20-23% of the userbase and has been fairly constant at that for a while now
I'd honestly prefer someone changing their UI passively, than have them turn to a mod that gives them UI changes and now gives them the tools to mess with other peoples UI.
We can roughly estimate, at least.
Remove one another one will pop up and not all of them are friendly.

source?
for me logic would seem to indicate that when the easiest and most safe mods are off the market then most of the people who are only into entry level mods would get discouraged and just quit all together. once its made harder to obtain them most of them wont put in the effort to go out and find something else. alot of the client users ive encountered in worlds seem to be pretty basic, even pretty noob-y users who just wanted to pick one up for a few reasons. i highly doubt they will care to actually put in effort to search for others.
Discord servers really aren't a good way to measure something
@twin river Dw I trust you guys tho <3
even analytics from a single mod would work, otherwise you're just pulling the number out of nowhere
people start using mods. since the wholesome groups are the largest they use wholesome mods. if you cripple the wholesome groups, people wont have anywhere to go for mods, and some people are really desperate. so theyll have to go to malicious communities. they get a feeling for the malicious features and suddenly theyre stuck with a mod that lets you reupload an avatar with a single button press
Too many already do it, and most of them go into it "I'll mod either way" so its gonna lead to more malicious mods being used since they aren't banned.
most of the safe mods come from public discord servers, vs the secluded servers u cant just google and might need money or referral to enter
the amount of people that will go for the malicious mods is extremely tiny, in reality most people will just stop bothering with mods
Some just grab whatever, not caring to checking it's contents first. Which is why we verify. User safety is extremely important.
^
Or stop playing at all which results in the same
how so? the largest vrchat modding server has 42k members. that means you can assume atleast 50% of thos epeople use mods. add on the other group 35k, and youve got a substantial number
I'll ask for permission to publicize the numbers and will dm you if its granted.
because discord members != actual mod users
I'd rather someone use atleast a safer mod that gets verified, instead of people usings mods that actually have intent of snagging them or doing malicious actions in game.
you know what the discord member count means? how many people are in the server :v thats all i can glean from it
still, by crippling wholesome groups some people will go to smaller malicious comunities. even if its a tiny percentage its still making them grow
Word of mouth as well ^^
developing a "safe" mod list would still be an incredible amount of work
honestly the only reason why there is modding in the first place is because of the lack of feature inclusion and weekly updates or something to keep things going at a steady pace to ensure proper engagement with users who use different currently incompatible devices as well as simple stuff as telling you when people join or leave the instance which should take a minute to implement and would be beneficial for everyone
We're not showing the Discord Membership as proof, it's mostly irrelevant. There's other data to go off.
The community affected by this already does this.
i would assume like at least 30% of users online at any given time have mods on tbh. most longtime players have them, the discords have more members than are ever online on vrchat on an average day. but i do believe that percentage is higher
if discord was somehow a requirement for mod usage (somewhat like poiyomi, which distributes through discord) sure, but most of the mods are hosted on github afaik
thats why i said 50%, not 100 or anything. we can also go off of the download counts from the github. personally people close to me had 2-4k downloads on their mods and this is in the smaller server
I mean every other guy I met is capable of just taking models. Shrug.
i'm sure vrchat's lawyers would be fine with that
thats the actual numbers i wanted, thank you π github downloads actually mean something
most mods are hosted on github yes, but most people find these githubs through the discord
Hosted on GitHub, and distributed through a Discord community that acts as a hub.
I'm sure their lawyers will also be a bit interested in the strongholding campaign against the mod tool itself that isn't even vrchat based.
^^^
I'd just like to add my thought if nobody has specifically put it out there first, not many here is really mad that the vrc dev removed mods, they're more upset that they no longer have the fixes that afflicted many users, enough to create a mod for it, or new features they wish to see in the base game, if I were a dev team member would definitely start looking at the mods, and start working on some of the more popular things that were downloaded first, and decide what else to do later
LOL
"Lol Indeed"
adding onto this, just adding the features and working more closely with the community for very basic feature implementation would probably make people not even need to make mods anymore
loll
THIS
Imagine having modders put simple fixes 4 years in. Pathetic. People will hate this post cause it's the truth sadly.
This is why I did suggest a way to get these features added in so the modders wont be inclined to switch over to malicious mods.
THIS
Phew this chat is spicy
vrchat has the right to ban any mod user and developer for life, they're asking them nicely to stop, that's not "Strong arming"
like eye tracking and join messages for example, those are very simple things, should take only a little more time than solving the 20fps problem
Actually on fire
yes cause im sure the devs will have a great time with modders to implement their awful bandaid fixes.
The person they strong armed is not vrchat based, nor was the tool directly made for it, it is out of their moderation, and they were threatening them directly.
Runescape has an issue like this in the past that is a very good case to look at and understand why VRC is being all-or-nothing with Mods.
People in Runescape used to make clients to use plugins that made the game better (and still do), but malicious people would use the old clients and add their own code to them letting them bypass some of the hack checks in Runescape. Oversimplified.
People can use these 'friendly modding tools' to patch their own shit in which would make it impossible for any code checking systems VRC uses to distinguish and would 'hide' their malicious activities until they are manually reported.
We're not disagreeing with this. Their platform, their rules.
^^
oh yea, the mod loader used has an endpoint which tracks statistics which is called every time someone opens the game with the loader and apparently weekly it gets hit 250k ish times for vrchat (dont quote me on this my memory's a bit fuzzy)
"A piece of tape on the side of a ship's hull to temporarily stop a hull doesn't mean that the person who applied it is fit to design boats." a moderator posted this last night and i think it perfectly sums up why having the devs work with modders is a bad idea
It's day 1 since good mods got banned, it's gonna blow out soon.
Would recommend to coma back tomorrow. That discussion might go another 24 hours
Oh shit that's smart Conf
This discussion wont end tbh even if one of us stops, theres alot of people who feel strongly about it.
Thanks for the idea since I now know how thsi can work for other games now
I don't expect it to end, but as long as it stays civil I'm fine.
im not saying they need to use the mod source code directly. but literally just binding to join and leave events shouldnt be something complicated
I'm siding with you guys
thank you good sir
or just adding eye tracking floats to the list of several stuff thats already synced with IK over the network
I'm still skeptical of decagear
It's trivially easy to hide malicious stuff inside supported systems, thats why it took so long to crack down on malicious avatar features. So allowing even more shit that is outside VRCs control like modloaders etc just makes the issue infinitely harder to fix. Even if the mod makers arent malicious, malicious people will abuse their tools to hide their hacks.
Althought I have to be realistic since this is spicy. Just cause you have a fix for the problem, implementing it into the giant network of actual code so it works may make errors that break something else or etc they are unaware of.
Welp, i'm gonna chill and have some fun on VRChat. Hopefully this all blows over soon
I'd rather it stay civil, no need for people to get all up in arms about it. π
Discussions is how you progress, not fighting.
it sadly wont i feel. too many people feel too strongly about this topic for it to ever really die.
have fun !
if im buying decagear it will be only the headset
frankly im not sure why im even still looking at this chat since it seems like a lost cause to try and convince these people
It isn't in their right to remove a platform for modding that isn't even vrchat based alone, regardless, remove one another one will come, its not the answer and its def not gonna stop it.
@loud gale That's also a bad idea and there's another example for this: There was a HUGE leak in Minecraft a while back because of a Mod someone made that had malicious code hidden in it that let them backdoor everyone's accounts.
yeah some people tried spamming and I don't like that.
Implimenting code from random people is a BAD idea.
Simple research shows most of the code they have has been verified and open sourced and has been improving the game for their users, now code OUTSIDE that discord is a different story.
I wouldn't trust anyone else or pay for them
bc nothing is going to change for either side so just start bitchin and call it a day
Really? Might need to keep an eye on things a bit more then.
Sit back and eat some popcorn.
May be able to get more accurate numbers at a later date
Moreover the people protesting that VRChat isn't adding new QoL features by DDoSing VRChat and tying up developer resources are literally making the problem that they are bitching about. If people stopped 'protesting' and let the Devs actually just develop the damn game the features they want would come out much faster lmao.
Another idea to help dial down users could be to create a chat so that people know what problems are being worked on, when the dev team gets enough complaints about something not functioning properly, or a new feature people want to see, it should get a bit more viewing than other things.
im pretty sure clients and mods are just technically the same concept, no? they just go hand in hand
This is typical VRC stuff lol people like to scream
Since when has that been happening?
It'll blow over in like a week max like every other outrage.
who is ddossing vrchat? there hasint been a vrchat ddos in a while
ah yes just open the api, they should have thought of that!!
An example of a Client would be the VRChat Client. Mods are modifications to the client.
The widespread use of "Client" as a term for "mod" is incorrect.
Two sides of the same coin, one side is hostile and the other is passive, they are both being lumped together and the people who made a unity injector that isn't based on vrchat along is being blackmailed to take down their injectors with bans, people are angry at the aggressive approach.
Nah don't have money for VRC+
If the features that are provided by mods were in it, I would.
So, I have a question , just a general question. Is anything gonna be done about the raging pedophilia problem going on in vrchat? Or is it just gonna be ignored? And dont give me "Just report it" Because it clearly does nothing. I know this is off topic but thought it should be addressed 
If the Devs allow clients/injectors to be used there is no way to tell the difference between positive and malicious mods. They can to ban them all.
That's what they are angry about, the good ones are being targeted and now it opens rooms for that 40% to go and use the more malicious not banned ones.
when is stuff like that not ignored
bans dont do anything really
Anyone having issues with video players recently? Just getting black screens since today all of a sudden.
I saw a really young person (under 14 prob) run around in a NSFW avatar and a fully grown adult was following them around making lewd remarks and other sus things
Like as a victim of child grooming i know what it looks and sounds like and well... Hate to break it to ya buuuuuuut
People have to report it for the issue to be fixed. You can automatically detect that shit or segment people.
giving mod creators more access to source code to "implement their fixes" sounds like a recipe for a massive flippin disaster if it goes into the wrong hands
for the people who casually mod on their main accounts they cant do nothing, but the repeat offenders in their massive discord cult just spoof hwid, ip, use vpn, and just reset their vms and log back in on an alt
People think banning the injector is gonna stop it too, but its not its just making it worse and more people will go to great lengths to fight back, regardless of mod makers intent.
ΰ² _ΰ²
what
the fuck
all we want is a little bit of transparency
Here we go again.
When i have to trap someone after they make a 14 year old have a mental breakdown. gather proof, AND REPORT IT. And nothing happenes its kinda sad ya know
you could say that to the quest avatar creators π€£
I just woke up and saw it.
sadly not much you can do about it over the internet but report it
yep
I mean it a abig event people have the right to voice their opinion
there's obviously two big problems that vrchat has with mods, which they dont seem to know how to deal with.
not even getting into the issue of malicious modders and mods being way harder to actually deal with-
- mods fix things that they dont prioritize/seem to be unable to fix, which makes their devs look bad
- mods oftentimes introduce features that vrchat was considering monetizing, but they don't want to admit to it before they have to, so they just blanket ban and bandaid a specific mod. (like the nametag avatar prefab from a while back that decorated your nameplate- which they "fixed" by making nameplates randomly offset up or down a few inches, specifically put a new section for it in the TOS, and coincidentally, a few months later, VRC+ comes out, with surprise surprise, nameplate avatar icons.)
No opinions allowed on the internet, silly
Licensing makes this difficult.
That's also why you must stay civil, because some were coming in here spamming and some are being hostile towards the other side on both fronts.
and 3, they are super protective and paranoid about competition, so they dont want anyone anywhere near vrc's internals in any capacity
they would say otherwise but we are talking about the majority here
If a issue is big enough talk about it, but don't start attacking people.
@surreal oasis I mean seemed kinda hostile
i have been watching this chat for the past 4 hours and the conversation has not changed
I think purp was more surprised cause I was talking still, I have no issue with purp.
"mods fix things that they dont prioritize/seem to be unable to fix, which makes their devs look bad"
Devs are too busy fighting the malicious stuff people do with mods to fix shit lol. People tie up their resources and then wonder why they dont get anything done
Dw.
yes its been a circle of the same exact argument since last night
that's not how that works
reaching out isnt that hard. creators can always make exceptions in their liscencnesncences
the vrchat iceberg but its just mods vs non mods
it's not the programmers that are going after modders. they have legal and moderation for that
The "malicious stuff people do" also has their own side, one person makes bad mods and the others have been countering them, but instead of going after bad modders, they strike the good ones and leave people defenseless.
Again one coin, two sides.
No me directly but younger kids who dont know how to protect themselves. Its something i wanted to bring up because i see it happen quite a lot and i mean you say nothing can be done but there is a reporting system for a reason. kinda sad how its just sitting there. 
... yes it is. If you have 5 devs (vrc has more the number is not important) and 3 of them are busy fixing stuff thats 3 less people working on new features.
Is the core users really for mods? seem like the core users are kids and casuals.
Its literally how this works, TF2 has had this issue for ages.
#moderation-reports exists for this specific reason.
i agree. esp after the Christmas kid quest boom its been more prevalent.
And yet again will i say they dont do a damn thing about it
ah yes because we need new features to add to the broken ones!
Amazing!
The root of that problem is that VRC is a free game, and trying to ban people on a FTP platform typically ends up being a waste of time. Always ways to circumvent, and new accounts are free.
I think the reason why mods have such a. Bad rap are the bad apples ina dozen that cause legal issues for the investors involved with the community ie stupid hacker groups /script kiddies
The trust system was implemented to mitigate this but itβs a joke
People like screaming and dont wanna admit the issue is really complicated and annoying to fix
tl;dr
Eh, most crashers rely on bugs and issues in the unity game itself. Limitations of the engine.
the trust system is a joke that is beyond laughable
It wont stop, they can ban all the peaceful people they want as well, but people are people like that one guy said it didn't work for alcohol or smoking, it'll just keep going but people will come back with worse things, its literally a breeding ground for encouraging more aggressive modding.
they will always get a bad rap the second you actually read vrchats ToS. its funny to see how people continue to defend this over and over..
Oh boy I have a treat for some of the unity engine bugs Iβve found and theyβre not pretty
the number is not important
a 20 dev team is way different than a 5 dev team.
You seem to present it as oh those poor devs who have to slave over fixes to prevent mods!
when they dont do shit. They are not doing anything to make the mods not work, the whole fuss is they are instead banning the modders themselves and holding their accounts hostage unless they stop distribution.
Trusted users are typically the people with crashing avatars lmao
And it clearly doesnt
Explain to me how. A modification to a game that would improve user comfortability is bad for the game ?
(I accidentally caused a 50GB memleak with particles once upon a time)
Sirw its against tos but that does not mean it's inately bad
Theres a difference a huge line between: Wanting a more stable game VS using more malicious mods to ruin someone elses game.
Sure*
That's true. And I say that myself as a trusted. I don't crash myself or anything though.
there's nothing illegal about that, that's silly. it's thuggish, but thats a silly thing to say
do YOU know what all that "good" mod is doing? can you read every line of it and find out that its completely safe.
"no cops in my worlds" "THE DEV TEAM SHOULD BE ARRESTED"
If someone changes their UI they don't hurt anyone, but someone who causes other peoples screens to blackout are two very different things.
bruh i got banned for wearing a popcat avatar βavatar was hatefulβ
The point that is being made is not that VRC doesn't have the right to enforce a mod ban as it is against ToS, the point most people are trying to argue for that enforcing ToS in this manner is "stupid".
Rules can be changed.
or how about.. dont change the rules
Or atleast re-evaluated.
I have been known for about a year or two now
still waiting for that lovely Purple but that won't come because I don't crash people enough π
I think at this point, people already dont like investors as its just people wanting money in their pockets over an actual good game and when the time comes, they pull right out. This isn't a VRChat only issue, just investors in general.
FUN FACT: modifications and custom clients are one of the biggest reasons for account theft!
yes actually, all of the most popular mods are (actually were because the repos were privated in response to th ebans) open source and have been reviewed by moderators in the wholesome modding community. dont trust the moderators? read the code yourself!
Yes, actually, as it seems most of them had their code up on github
All the mods within the modding group discord are checked to make sure no nonce is rating the community and to get those malicious mods you need to go out of your way to find
lmao
Fun fact, the people who got hit didn't do this! and actually fought against it and still do!
You don't get that through crashing π€
I got it through uploading content
i enjoy the better ik and higher fps. worth the ban to me
Yes, but also no. you are picking the bad's and hiding the goods from modding jackass
or how about, stop having a community? great idea.
this is a community driven game. Without the people who make content, it would not exist.
and those mods are content. they bugfix and improve user comfort.
Because vrchat is terrible at communication, and rarely prioritizes what people complain about
I mean that's how it is when you get big corp within games
Yes we call it GitHub
fun fact! cars are the bbiggest cause of death among teens!
I'm willing to bet it had nothing to with it being a popcat avatar.
you are being really silly.
Always use 2FA and a unique password.
come on dude .-.
what investors want over the community wants
What people don't realize somehow is the implications of removing the more passive modders, and treating them all the same, you're making it worse and I'd rather have a few people with better FPS than someone who is killing entire lobbys.
Dear lord, this is still going on?
It's not gonna stop its that massive of a issue, regardless if we do.
with a patch that seemingly totally broke video players and xbox gamepad inputs as far as I've noticed so far, lul
well im heading out. i can tell this chat is too far gone for literally anyone to stop.
Lmao.
the point is taken, but "this videogame I play in the comfort of my own home is not much different than this real life historical turmoil" is silly
Yeah however run all fairness it's neccisary I bet w/out the money the game would be worse mostliekly
have fun advocating for completely unallowed things!
actually the process is quite streamlined and is quote easy for beginners, there are even guides! (also mod is the corret term not client)
or you're too far gone to believe what we are saying
Im starting a headpat train now
:(
And nothing gets done about it.
Then you clearly don't have situational awareness.

Yeah its bad in this game I saw more in the black cat as of late and more children there.
I don't understand you, refusing to refute our rebuttals and then saying we don't provide evidence
Join the call sexy man
And people dont fucking understand that kids cant protect themselves. I sure as fuck couldnt
I'm with my gm rn sorry big boy
Modded clients are 5% of userbase, best. Probably way less. You are delutional. Most people just play on Steam and don't break the rules.
This entire convorsation was explicitly allowed by Tupper, the community manager, and many of the other VRC team members who have been actively engaging (sporatically) with the community here, so.... wrong?
The creators aren't bashing them but the users lol
The creator said it's alright even IF they would take code from them. Not saying they did.
Boooo
if people migrate into more aggressive modding it will only give that specific mod more exposure making it easier to ban/fix. This might create a cycle but its better than losing control of your game.
This type of issue is not unique to vrchat so as long as the Dev do not act to late, the game will be fine.
Vrchat would be shooting itself in the foot to ban all modders. It's a huge chunk of the player base
How so, I've been listening to each person and been civil?
@vocal shard pat pat
I never said they were bad, but misinformed.
@vocal shard :pet:

How much research have you done?
13 or older
yes, you have to be at least 13 years old.
pretty sure the game is 13+
13, I believe.
13+
There isn't one, which means it defaults to Steam and Facebook's age limit of 13+.
With parental permission
Every online game has a requirement if 13+
Same for discord except in some countries where you have to be older
But the game could do something about it. and you know its 13+ yeah those are kids
Quote being online
Do research more then you can say that.
Its happening on their platform
theere is actually (https://hello.vrchat.com/legal) section 2 elligibility. first line
Keep it civil as well, as we are.
Yep, pretty much this. "Oh these poor martyrs getting attacked", so tired of this kind of defense-sheme
We don't have any stats though. Maybe more maybe less. As we can't say they're more you also can't say they're only 5% or less. You can't know yourself.
they need to do something
You haven't either so I don't treat you the same.
The most amusing part of this is that in a week all the people crying about leaving the game forever are going to be back and nobody will give a crap about all this drama lmao. Happens literally every time, I've watched this exact scenario play out like 5 times now with VRC pfft.
Perfect. No argument needed then, 13+ is allowed. Debate over.
people said the same thing yesterday morning.
yet we're still talking about it
1 day =/= a week
Don't know where you got that number from. Definitely larger than that.
Big Thonk
It's gonna keep going tbh regardless.
Thank you for having common sense btw
this was never an arguement my friend, juist someone who forgot the age limit
I keep things civil, talk to me the same and I do.
Mate this is blackmail/ massive ban wave of people who mod the game I'm most certain that it's not gonna end ina few days
i'm just saying. Im pretty sure vrc did not expect this kind of community reaction
Please do more research, that is a really low number.
I can't say with any certantly, no. But to claim "this game would be dead without mods" the delusion is real. Screw off with that lmao. mods don't do anything for this game.
true, but when there is little to no transparency and no response to made up rumors, it kinda just feeds people to believe any rumor someone starts.
^^
How many fucking times do we have to tell you
its hard to know, based off the numbers i would guess atleast 10-20k of the active playerbase is modded atleast
I would also wager that the people who have VRC+ are much more than 50% mod users.
percentage wise no idea
It's what the mods intend to do is the issue, like I said theres a HUGE difference between someone who crashes you and someone who uses mods to stop themselves from being crashed.

We could try comparing discord server sizes to each other, but not everyone who uses vrchat is in this server
Firewing ! Ayy
πΏ
But we can still see it's a large amount
Sup
It is tbh
I can definitely say every other user Ive talked to, be it in friend groups or public, uses some QOL mod. sometimes just 1, sometimes several. none of them are EBIL HACKERZ
also keyword many people add, active not just playerbase

oops wrong ping myb
I wish the people who make the banning decisions like this would be more forward in their desicion Since that would allow them to gauge community support and or dissent so that issues like this don't spring forward when huge discussions are made like this
I agree. It would definitely not die. But it may make a hit in active players for a while if suddenly all mod users would get banned. You may then have not 40k on weekends but 20k or whatever. No one knows. But that hole would eventually fill up with new people again.
It's too big of a issue its prob gonna keep going either way, even if we don't, but as long as it stays civil its okay.
Are yall watching this chat eating popcorn in dango? Imma join vc @limber aspen
Most of the people on my friendlist that have VRC+ are running mods π€·ββοΈ
@true sky sorry forgot to reply
There are way more than 1000 people using mods.
Yes
Imma drop by in the vc
can we just all agree its a fairly substantial amount ?
simple research can show you.
This reaction has happened every time VRC has done literally anything, of course they expected it. They have watched this cycle repeat more times than I have, I'm sure they noticed. They don't care because nobody sticks to their guns, or so few people do that it doesn't matter. VRC is growing exponentially, we've passed the previous peaks repeatedly this last year.
There is always a minority of dissenters and they are always the loudest so they look more numerous than they actually are. In reality all of this drama is like. 100 people max out of several thousand lmao. There is no reason for them to care when people start screaming because its so few people in the big picture that its meaningless.
Again, do more research.
im a mod and vrc+ user. i want to support the devs platform that ive been on for 3 years but i also think they are dip shits half the time
I would say it is if nothing else a varied amount, because I've seen it in many different groups with real different cultures and such
Yo can i dm, same with you @distant rampart
This isn't definitive but one of the largest mods has a discord server with over 20,000 people just online
Ye go ahead
anyone know some cool boruto skins
But I will say theres more people who use PASSIVE, but theres alot that use aggressive as well.
Way more than 5%
so 120k people usually. Say just 5% uses that, its 6k people
All the VRC+ users I know, are using mods.
