#fab

1 messages ยท Page 53 of 1

gaunt flicker
#

Don't need to test

#

But guaranteed purchase here

delicate dove
#

ooh!

#

dont need it atm, but im sure most of my code buddies would be happy

gaunt flicker
#

Literally the only thing in that I want

#

Open function log in bp editor

#

Is stupid its not already an engine feature

#

Also

#

ADD A GOD DAMN LOG CATEGORY CONFIG if possible

#

i.e. I want to enable LogOnline or some other category, not just for your log, but for logging in general

#

I hate 1) finding the log category name 2) digging through config to enable/disable it 2a) command line argument fiddling

#

Thats worth buying as a seperate plugin itself

#

One of those things I want to make but don't have time for

#

Also, I don't know if its possible to enumerate log categories

wooden falcon
#

log log log log, it's better than bad, it's good!

#

sorry, couldn't help it..Ren and Stimpy quote

zealous ibex
#

Oooooh that looks awesome @west tide ๐Ÿ˜ฎ โค

west tide
#

@gaunt flicker How would you want the log categories to be configured? Also, are there categories that are disabled per default?

gaunt flicker
#

Yes, there are a few log categories that don't log

#

such as deeper networking stuff

#

Things that log to VeryVerbose but category is set to Verbose by default

#

(Theres actually a lot of stuff like this, and for good reason, otherwise log would be spammy)

#

But soemtimes its really helpful to read VeryVerbose logs (that is why its there after all)

#

However setting log categories to different verbositys is hella annoying

#

Or at least, way more annoying than it should be

#

Theres two ways to set log category verbosity

#

config/cmdline, and compile time

#

When you declare a log category, you specify its default verbosity

#

confg/cmdline overrides default

#

So not only do you have to hunt down the logcategory (which is okay I guess if you can't enumerate), you need to open up code to figure out what its default verbosity is

#

Again, no idea if those are able to be pulled up programmatically given how categories are defined, but anything to make this easier would be great

#

Bonus points if you can change log verbosity at runtime easily

#

i.e. change LogCook to Errors

#

so you only see Errors instead of lesser things

#

You shouldn't have to parse to do that kind of filtering

#

As the log infrastructure already supports that, as long as you can change the verbosity of a given log category

west tide
#

Thanks for the info!
I think enumeration is not possible, at least I did not see any way to do it

gaunt flicker
#

Aye

#

Maybe @grave ibex or someone would know more about that

#

ยฏ_(ใƒ„)_/ยฏ

#

Otherwise, I might just write an external tool to do that parsing for me quickly

#

Either way

#

Those types of features would be 'pro level' logging features

#

ALL THINGS THAT SHOULD ALREADY HAVE UI FOR

west tide
#

indeed - I only made this plugin because the current log was annoying me

#

constant scrolling and searching for stuff that should be so simple

lone mountain
#

Who wants to make quick easy money

#

Make a Dark Mode UI for Unreal plugin

ebon leaf
#

you want it darker?

lone mountain
#

Yeah

#

Darker

zealous ibex
#

Isn't the UI pretty much dark already? ๐Ÿ˜›

lone mountain
#

comments are default light gray

#

and I can't change that in settings ๐Ÿ˜ฆ

#

But yeah, I just noticed a few things that are just QOL stuff, that can't be changed in editor prefs

#

Unless I just didn't find it, but Google failed me too

#

Just saying, $5 plugin that would probably sell like hotcakes

sullen lion
#

You mean these comments?

lone mountain
#

Liar

#

You are CPing

#

If you were hitting C, it would ask you to rename Comment ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

#

Nice try though ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

gaunt flicker
#

I think he was just asking if those are the comments you're talking about

wicked pebble
#

@lone mountain A dark mode for ui?

lone mountain
#

Ohhhhhhhhhh @sullen lion was that it?

#

@wicked pebble Yeah, just darker

#

All around

#

I mean, it's pretty much just a bit dark than Unity's gray

#

and that's ug

#

I rather it be lot of blacks all over

sullen lion
#

Actually man

#

I was hitting c

lone mountain
#

I don't know, it's just a personal pref, was disappointed that I couldn't change comment color by default

#

shh

sullen lion
#

you can tho

lone mountain
#

where?

wicked pebble
#

Let me check, because I did it.

gaunt flicker
#

Isn't there a massive color list somewhere

sullen lion
#

Yeah

wicked pebble
#

My comments are pure white

lone mountain
#

Yeah, in Editor Defaults

gaunt flicker
#

I have the problem of too many color configs

lone mountain
#

But, comment box is not there?

sullen lion
#

Comment title color or smth

lone mountain
#

oh wtf

#

I had to type comment into all settings

wicked pebble
#

You found it?

lone mountain
#

yeah it wasn't in the same list as the other ones my bad

wicked pebble
#

No issue ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

lone mountain
#

Thanks! But still

#

The rest of the UI

#

(non-node based_

wicked pebble
#

I'll give my hand at making the UI White and darker for you then ๐Ÿ˜›

lone mountain
#

I still think It would be easy money to have a plugin that can give you more customization over the editor (code-based)

west tide
#

@lone mountain Just have a look into SlateEditorStyle.cpp, everything you can think of is defined in there

timber lintel
#

Anyone knows if the Generic Shooter by Allar supports open world joining without a lobby?

delicate dove
#

i dunno, maybe @gaunt flicker knows

ebon leaf
#

...why would he know? ๐Ÿ˜›

delicate dove
#

just a hunch

zealous ibex
#

Argh it sucks you can't sell .99 cent packs ๐Ÿ˜›

ebon leaf
#

you can. They just need to be 99 cents and 4 dollars ๐Ÿ˜›

zealous ibex
#

I have like 25 small GUI assets I wanna sell for a bit, just asking 5 bucks seems a lot ๐Ÿ˜›

ebon leaf
#

lol yeah

zealous ibex
#

I get .99 may not be too prifitable for epic, but still, usually cheap packs sell large quanteties

ebon leaf
#

just put it up for $4.99, then put it on 80% off sale for 2 months as soon as you can... Epic, by their own new rules, should be asking you then if you want to drop it because it has spent most of it's time at that reduced price. QED ๐Ÿ˜›

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ˜›

plush pond
#

I'd like to see less shading in ue4 UI, more flat look

#

would definetely buy a plugin if that's possible to do

#

and themes would be so cool

ebon leaf
#

oooh... new reply when you email marketplace-support... though now it says they "are working on responding as soon as possible" rather than sayign 24-48 hours ๐Ÿ˜›

zealous ibex
#

RIP

#

Now we can't have them for waiting a whole week for a reply ๐Ÿ˜›

ebon leaf
#

lol yeah... so it begins XD

dark matrix
#

hi guys what's up

zealous ibex
#

Hey ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

dark matrix
#

need some suggestions

#

hello my friend

ebon leaf
#

Howdy

zealous ibex
#

Whatcha need suggestions about? ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

#

@ebon leaf wait did you toolkit form you into a cowboy from the wild west? ๐Ÿ˜›

dark matrix
#

I got some 3D Models ,they are like total about 50 to 70 models, containing ,fences, stairs, weapons and so on, but they are not textured just modeled what i am thinking is to put them on marketplace for free, can i put them now or i have to make their textures also, if so can anyone help me haha think i should find some texture artist if he can help me for free as the assets will be free too

ebon leaf
#

@zealous ibex that messages makes very little sense to me sir.

zealous ibex
#

nvm ๐Ÿ˜›

ebon leaf
#

@dark matrix In general, Epic are very picky about what content they allow up on the marketplace for free. But you can certainly submit it to them and see.

#

But they would need to be textured

dark matrix
#

if you guys need list , let me know i can pm it whole, message me plz for it

zealous ibex
#

@dark matrix I think they require textures, but nothing is stopping you from redistributing stuff for free by other means ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

#

(for example you could use a google drive zip file and post it on the forums, you'll be praised if they look good <3)

dark matrix
#

yeah nice @zealous ibex suggestions and yes thx @ebon leaf

zealous ibex
#

The quick list of models you listed sound really interesting tho ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

ebon leaf
#

Yeah, sounds like they could be useful for prototyping and all that jazz for sure ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

dark matrix
#

yes they are quite good, i was dreaming to sell them before, like about 4 years ago, but never got time to make them done and so they are just left behind

#

was checking my copy haha as i have a list in there, will be checking those models this night to make sure what i got

#

got a wordpad file haha

#

what's up guys , what you guys are up to

#

i will make it more clear and will be sharing if possible on forum as @zealous ibex said, but also thx @tardy lark for the suggestion too

#

they are low poly, made in Blender 3D

ebon leaf
#

Look nice ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

zealous ibex
#

Wooooow that looks sick <3

dark matrix
#

lol haha sick means bad or ok

#

@zealous ibex tell me haha lol

zealous ibex
#

Sick means absolutely amazing in this context :)

dark matrix
#

hahahaha oh nice lol

#

they are rendered in blender3D so that's why did not came out good as i was noob with lighting before lol haha

ebon leaf
#

lol they look goo dto me! if you do put them up on line I'd love a link XD

dark matrix
#

haha yes i will do that , just need to find them all, they are just output i posted , have to see the model (Blender FIle) and than i think i have to export them to FBX for UE4

zealous ibex
#

Yeah UE4 uses FBX

dark matrix
#

๐Ÿ˜ƒ cool

#

do you guys want to know why i made them, or why i was doing that ๐Ÿ˜›

zealous ibex
#

Sure ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

#

Oh btw tried seeing what they look like when the mesh/material is set to smooth? ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

dark matrix
#

yeah they will be more cool haha @zealous ibex

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ‘

dark matrix
#

like when textured they will become kinda good and can be used in small projects

#

brb guys @zealous ibex @ebon leaf

zealous ibex
#

Sure ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

ebon leaf
#

@thehorseman007#4689 I would be very interested in those aswell.

thin barn
#

I'm working on a 100% blueprints marketplace asset that is getting close to completion. However I want a way to visually show what it can do. So I need some example 3D models.
Can I use the free Asset packs from Epic? Like Open World Demo Collection?

ebon leaf
#

@thin barn yep. As long as they aren't the selling point of your asset, and as long as you state in your pack that that's where they came from. Only asset packs from Epic, not free content from other authors on the marketplace, can be used (so no mixamo animations, pixelperfect meshes, etc.).

thin barn
#

@ebon leaf That's awesome, thanks for the help! Any chance you have a link were it says how we can use the asset packs from Epic?
The selling point rule should be np, since they are just to show how the assets works.

ebon leaf
#

@thin barn I'm not sure Epic have actually stated it on the forums or anything like that. But They have clarified it numerous times in here. FWIW, my packs include content from the Infinity Blade packs, and there are numerous other examples of them across the marketplace, such as the ARPG inventory system, which also uses Infinity Blade assets.

thin barn
#

Yeah I saw that a kinda similar asset to mine uses the Infinity Blade assets, that's how I got the idea. ๐Ÿ˜‰

ebon leaf
#

If you want written confirmation, your best bet is to email marketplace-support@unrealengine.com and wait for their response. However, they do go through the submissions during the submission process, so they would let you know if there's an issue with it during that. But in the past, their only issues have been that it needs to be only a demonstration of your pack (for instance, you can't be selling rocks and include rocks from Epic's pack to make it have more content, but you can use those rocks in a system that procedurally places rocks in the world) and that you need to state somewhere in your pack (either on the marketplace page, or inside of the pack itself) that content was taken from x/y/z.

thin barn
#

Where inside the pack would you state that? I was thinking maybe I can put it in the manual somewhere?

ebon leaf
#

@thin barn whilst this comes from a conversation regarding using plugins specifically, Stephanie does touch on it here - this is from January the 20th (though depending on your timezone, it may be the 19ths):

#

I usually state it in the blueprint tutorial included in my project, as well as on the marketplace information.

thin barn
#

I didn't see it in the marketplace information on your asset. ๐Ÿ˜„
Gratz on getting featured with the survival game multiplayer template! How is it going with that pack?

ebon leaf
#

Hmm so it isn't. Odd, I could have swore I included that in the additional notes bit. Guess I'd better email epic too XD

#

And thanks. It's done very well ๐Ÿ˜ƒ Response to the rewrite/update has been very positive!

ebon leaf
#

oh... haha @thin barn I was looking for a different image and found this in my pictures folder... this is from an earlier conversatino where someone else was asking about the IB assets...

thin barn
#

Ok, so Stephanie wrote it should be in the description then.

ebon leaf
#

yeah

thin barn
#

hmmm when I try to create my seller profile I get the error message: "Sorry, one of the items you were trying to create or modify already exists in the database."
That's weird. heh I wonder if I created a seller profile at some point in the past? Then again... why am I not just redirected to it now, if it exists?

scarlet wave
#

@ebon leaf ponders if he got the fonts he uses from Epic........ lmao I mean all should bow to the King!!!!!!

dark matrix
#

thx @ebon leaf i will work on them so that i can share them, this can take some time but i will try my best

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ‘ awesome โค

jovial thunder
#

Has the marketplace staff addressed customer support to a buyer when there is a language barrier?

ebon leaf
#

As a marketplace speller you are expected to know all languages, including made up ones.

zealous ibex
#

Lol

fallow plinth
#

Guys, I have a question regarding a submission, if I upgrade a package from 4.13 to 4.14 I get the "lighting needs to be rebuilt" even though it was built in 4.13. Now epic games always ask for the files to be the current live version even when the projects are made with previous engine versions. The problem is that if I rebuild the light in 4.14, the .umap(s) won't show anymore in 4.13. What to do? Just send the 4.14 files without rebuilding the light?

ebon leaf
#

Why don't you make a separate copy of the project in 4.14 (as in, copy/paste the entire folder) then buildi the lighting in that. You can always submit separate builds for 4.13 and 4.14 once they approve it

fallow plinth
#

Oh I didn't knew of the possibility to have separate files for each version.

ebon leaf
#

Yeah. Sometimes you have to because they deprecate old nodes in blueprints and all that stuff.

#

tbh, I submit a separate build for every major version because it's easier for me to manage them that way ๐Ÿ˜›

fallow plinth
#

Makes sense

#

Awesome then, thanks!

ebon leaf
#

No worries ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

delicate dove
#

or both

gaunt flicker
#

ayyyy

zealous ibex
#

lol

tender flame
#

NAH MA MANAY FA YA!

gaunt flicker
#

People make mp assets that only work on single player

#

Get paid to convert assets to multiplayer

#

Keep making not network supported assets people.

zealous ibex
#

lol

#

I hate that there is stuff like KeyValuePair missing in BP networking. It is making networking examples etc way less fun to make xD

ebon leaf
#

@gaunt flicker Would have loved that advice earlier :/

gaunt flicker
#

? xD

ebon leaf
#

I dunno if the creator of the Modular RPG System is in this channel... but your description on the marketplace is "d"

delicate dove
#

he wants the d

ebon leaf
#

lol

tribal jackal
#

lmao amazing

#

I'm sure this has been answered before, but is it possible to release a free package of UI icons and widget templates on the Marketplace? Or I imagine they could just be uploaded onto the Forum (or in technical terms, a mediafire link posted in a thread on the Forum)

ebon leaf
#

They can be released anywhere external to the marketplace if you own the rights/have permission to release them. For putting them on the marketplace, you need to email epic and discuss it with them as they are very picky about what is allowed on the marketplace for free.

ebon leaf
#

what is it? ๐Ÿ˜›

plush pond
#

@gaunt flicker I got you covered ๐Ÿ˜›

#

submitting sometime soon

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ‘

tender flame
#

Who aware about Simplygon situation?

#

@sleek egret Could Epic say somethin on that topic? (Simplygon aciqured by MS and registration is closed, no more free licenses)

sleek egret
#

Let me check

wooden falcon
#

I guess one could say they're...Simply Gone :/

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ˜›

sleek egret
#

-_-

tender flame
sleek egret
#

Thank you very much

tender flame
#

https://www.simplygon.com/account/register/ (old page) redirects to main page

Simplygon

Simplygon is the leading solution for automatic optimization of 3D-game content and Level of Detail. By replacing tedious and time-consuming manual work, Simplygon offers the benefits of LODs but without the drawbacks of increased production time and development cost.

zealous ibex
#

@sleek egret Any chance you could have a very quick look at Case #555359, it's a question about a sale planned for tomorrow ๐Ÿ˜› ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

summer jacinth
#

Im really confused

#

My asset got rejected again

#

here is one of Epics reasons

#

"The textures used in the project appear blurry and
low resolution at a semi-close distance, which affects the quality of the asset (such as
the paint can textures .etc)."

#

I dont understand, how is this texture too low resolution?

#

Is that not unnecessary nitpicking?

thin barn
#

I would say it depends on your target platform. If the asset is intended for mobile games IMHO the resolution is fine. ๐Ÿ˜ƒ
If it's intended for PC/Console the resolution is too low, because the text on the can is blurry/ almost unreadable.
Another solution may be to remove the tiny text, so the low texture resolution is less noticeable?

summer jacinth
#

Its overkill to have the resolution any higher

#

this is a tiny prop

#

Even for mobile this would be over the top

thin barn
#

There is no kill like overkill! ๐Ÿ˜„

supple moon
#

You gotta look at games these days, even tiny props are real detailed, probably more to do with the usage of a material system instead of just straight texture sheets

summer jacinth
#

I just dont see how this can even be considered low resolution for the size of the prop

#

you wouldnt give this a 2048x2048 texture, that is wasted resources

#

Even for todays systems

thin barn
#

So what resolution is the texture then?

supple moon
#

It also doesn't seem to have been baked fro hi poly? I mean the can has visible hard edges etc

summer jacinth
#

1024x1024

#

It is baked from HP, its just a low poly model

thin barn
#

hmmm I think then you must've made a mistake somewhere. This doesn't look like the kinda quality you would expect from a 1024px texture on a tiny model. Are you sure this is displaying at 1024px and not a lower res Mipmap or something like that?

summer jacinth
#

Yes, but even then, the texture itself is not too low res

#

it could be 4096 and still look the same, but would still not look low resolution

#

It has just become nitpicking to say that it is too low resolution because you cant read the text

#

This is a tiny prop, even at 1024 the resolution is unneeded

thin barn
#

It might also help if you share the UV layout of the can. So an artist can check if it's done as efficiently as possible. ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

summer jacinth
supple moon
#

Do the base metal with a material layer in UE4 so you can turn the detail up, then use your whole texture sheet for the logos and add more polys to LOD0 ๐Ÿ˜›

#

It just looks like a 2008 prop to me

summer jacinth
#

I still dont see why this is a reason for rejection

#

Honestly seems like whoever reviewed it is being too picky

thin barn
#

I think if you follow @supple moon s advice your asset won't be rejected again. ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

summer jacinth
#

I do plan on adding more detail to the model itself

thin barn
#

Well good luck! I'm also dreading the moment I submit my asset. ^^ The asset store team is definitely picky about quality. However I see that as a good thing,
I hate buying low quality assets myself. ๐Ÿ˜‰

summer jacinth
#

Its a good thing at times, but bad when its dumb reasons

#

Or when they are vague about it

thin barn
#

Yeah I think getting rejected for a vague reason is the thing I'm most afraid of... The reason they gave you this time seems pretty clear though. ๐Ÿ˜„

summer jacinth
#

It wasnt

#

This is the second time I submitted it

#

this is what they said the first time

#

"- Texture resolution is too low."

ebon leaf
thin barn
#

@ebon leaf thanks for the link! ๐Ÿ˜ƒ I hope I won't get into trouble for the "disproportionate amount" of Epic content, because I'll need a few models to show the BP functionality. Ah well, we'll see. ๐Ÿ˜„

zealous ibex
#

I am personally actually supprised I passed my first asset without it getting rejected lol

ebon leaf
#

Maybe kit was a bit too busy ๐Ÿ˜› lol

#

j/k of course ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ˜›

#

I mean I do think it took 5 emails back and forth to get it properly prefixed etc, but it didn't get rejected ^^

ebon leaf
#

tbh I'm surprised they are still accepting inventory systems that aren't crazy different to the ones alreayd on the store lol

zealous ibex
#

True

#

I was supprised too, but I tried my odds due to having it done anyway

ebon leaf
#

not a commentary on your system at all btw, but I think there's like 5 of them now, and most of them are pretty similar at least in the way they work as far as the player is concerned.

zealous ibex
#

Yup

#

Tho mine has crafting (just like exi's) ๐Ÿ˜›

ebon leaf
#

ah okay, I wasn't aware of that

zealous ibex
#

It wasent in at first

#

and I still need to make a video about it, but yeah, you can now produce items with items you collect

ebon leaf
#

nice ๐Ÿ˜ƒ what sort of crafting system is it? recipe list or grid based?

zealous ibex
#

Recipe list

#

I implemented grid based some time ago, it's just more tedious in my opinion

#

Scrolling through a list is way faster than having to remember each and every recipe

ebon leaf
#

agreed. I have list based in my template lol

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ‘

ebon leaf
#

Had a few people ask about implementing Exi's... but best I can offer them is "it should work, you have to work it out though until I make it big and can buy all the marketplace shit" ๐Ÿ˜›

zealous ibex
#

Your template is super nice ๐Ÿ˜ƒ โค

ebon leaf
#

haha thanks ๐Ÿ˜› took me bloody long enough so the praise is appreciated XD

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ˜›

ebon leaf
#

I'm very glad I didn't set up toggl until AFTER it came out... not sure I could handly that number...

zealous ibex
#

LMAO

elfin plinth
#

@summer jacinth you wasted half of the uv, that is reason alone to reject that

#

You seem to be really defensive of your gameart instead of wanting to improve

#

IMO marketplace assets should be game ready (not waste resources for no gain)

west tide
#

@summer jacinth I agree with the others, don't be offended when receiving professional feedback.
I am no artist, but that texture is really blurry (just look at the barcode in the lower corner) and has a lot of aliasing in some other parts. Also, the white paint on the edges does not look realistic at all, paint cannot flow in such intricate streaks because it is too thick.

wicked pebble
#

Not gonna add anything, but that is definitely too low res. Like @elfin plinth said, it feels wasted, and paint doesn't flow that straight.

delicate dove
#

doesnt seem to have proper roughness and normal map values either

zealous ibex
#

(also something to note would be, produce 4k textures, the user can always crop the image down to 1024 I think :P)

#

And if not there must be a way to make a texture more low-res. Going higher res however is pretty much impossible ๐Ÿ˜‰

flat schooner
#

@proven lily I have send you email with updated asset. I need to fix one more thing. I will send asset once again I need 15 mins. Sorry for this.

flat schooner
#

Ok I send you once again corect version of my asset. So please ignore version 4 from previous e-mail, Corect version is 5.

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ‘

#

I like that you abuse major versions too ๐Ÿ˜›

#

(so for updates just use version 4, version 5 etc instead of let's say 1.2.4 etc)

wooden falcon
zealous ibex
#

oooh looking cool

wooden falcon
#

shameless plug: he bought the high poly skulls from me, but obviously did a lot of work on them creating his low polys

#

I like the cracking he added...makes them look smashed

zealous ibex
#

Yup

wooden falcon
#

that does look cool

ebon leaf
zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ˜›

#

also it redirects to the right website, just https, which doesn't work

ebon leaf
#

Fair enough. Still... would probably be better if it actually said the right thing lol

zealous ibex
#

Yup, just brining up that the hyperlink is broken too

ebon leaf
#

damn, I'm not featured anymore XD

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ˜ฆ

#

You got featured for a good week tho right? ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

abstract hatch
#

@ebon leaf That was totally my bad and possibly intentional

ebon leaf
#

almost 2 weeks because of the technical difficulties ๐Ÿ˜›

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ˜›

#

nice

ebon leaf
#

@abstract hatch intentional? ๐Ÿ˜› trying to misdirect everyone? ๐Ÿ˜›

abstract hatch
#

๐Ÿ˜‰

zealous ibex
#

dw, my website link is more messed up ๐Ÿ˜› (working on it)

ebon leaf
#

Yeah... at least Kit's website works when you get there XD

zealous ibex
#

Yup ๐Ÿ˜›

tender flame
#

So any news on Simplygon?

summer jacinth
#

@elfin plinth @west tide @delicate dove Thanks for the feedback, I wasnt trying to be defensive but its not really helpful if people just give a blanket statement of it being "too low res" and not giving any insight into whats actually low res about it. Im just going to remake the paintcan because it is pretty bad (but then again, it is an extremely insignificant object that is both tiny and hardly used in the pack)

wooden falcon
#

what's the pack of?

elfin plinth
#

@summer jacinth there is another side of this too, if marketplace staff went into great details on how to fix everything people submit to them, they'd be doing others homework. Their responsibility is just to point out what's wrong, not how to fix it IMO ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

summer jacinth
#

Well originally all the said was "textures are too low res" with no description of what was low res

#

So I resubmitted and they sent me a pdf of what to fix, and thats where they said the paintcan, but to me something like a paintcan shouldnt be very detailed, since its not an object of focus, nor is it a big object. Not really any reason why the text on the can needs to be readable

west tide
#

Just when they announced they would make it an engine feature

summer jacinth
#

Yeah I saw that haha

#

the first comment is "isnt this included in 4.15?"

west tide
#

Still, it was probably a lot of work

elfin plinth
#

@west tide yeah, that was my thinking as well

summer jacinth
#

So another of my submissions got rejected, is there a massive crackdown on the marketplace content or something?

#

I submitted this

delicate dove
#

why and what got rejected

summer jacinth
#

Rejected for "lacking quality"

#

I honestly dont understand

delicate dove
#

id need to see the textures and material setup, mesh setup, collision, and uv-maps of those meshes to give an opinion

summer jacinth
#

Compared to other assets that are on the marketplace currently, and that have been released this week I dont see how this is "lacking quality"

#

Not to be rude, but I feel its injustified, especially how I am not given any details on why its lacking quality

#

I hope you can see why Im angry about this, I work hard on my content, for it to be rejected without detailed reasoning

delicate dove
#

I suggest sending @sleek egret an email.
I also suggest to try and stay calm ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

sleek egret
#

I was summoned?

delicate dove
#

Shirk didnt get a proper email on why his assets where rejected

sleek egret
#

Ah okay. @summer jacinth go ahead and send me a PM with the ticket numbers and I'll take a look

#

Thank you Luos ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

delicate dove
#

np hug

wooden falcon
#

that looks pretty good Shirk

#

at least from that pic

summer jacinth
#

This is the second time this has happened

#

Is there any chance we can also be given the name of the reviewer who rejected it?

wooden falcon
#

lol

#

bad idea

summer jacinth
#

I just want to know incase its the same person who rejected my last submission

#

Because Id rather request a different reviewer

delicate dove
#

Steph is lead marketplace, so its best to let her take a look at it

zealous ibex
#

that screenshot looks pretty sick ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

summer jacinth
#

Yeah Ill send her an email

#

And thanks @zealous ibex

zealous ibex
#

Your probably best off clicking on her in the sidebard and using the send message ๐Ÿ˜‰ (atleast I think that's what she means by PM)

#

and np, not seen the UV's, textures etc, but from the screenshot I like it

ebon leaf
#

@summer jacinth Are you still studying? You're pretty quick with your packs in the last time

summer jacinth
#

I am, but Ive dropped my course load down significantly

#

Im also trying to really improve all my skills and such, only just recently considered actually doing game development as a job and not a hobby

gaunt flicker
#

'Lacks quality' with zero explaination is the new 'because I said so'

summer jacinth
#

Its quite frustrating

#

Especially how it just got rejected, with no chance for correction

#

Before if there was something such as a naming convention that was off they would just ask you to fix and resubmit, now they just reject

zealous ibex
#

:(

silver moat
#

@gaunt flicker It's not new.

gaunt flicker
#

By new I mean 'newer than because i said so'

silver moat
#

Missing the old terms.

gloomy bramble
#

I wish there was changelogs in marketplace.

gaunt flicker
#

Unless author keeps their own change logs

#

Most of them would be

#

'All files modified.'

#

Due to a new version resave

gloomy bramble
#

Hmm

#

Had 2 new updates today and no idea whats new ha

gaunt flicker
#

Epic pushed out updates to my assets without me pushing an update

#

They still remain a mystery

gloomy bramble
#

o.o

#

When you only get 2MB/s downloading from market place ๐Ÿ˜ฐ

thorny zenith
#

hey guys i want to put something on the marketplace and i have few questions can someone answer them please :?

delicate dove
#

just ask them ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

gloomy bramble
#

Is there a way to get a refund from assets in the marketplace?

delicate dove
#

contact marketplace person

#

need very valid point though

gloomy bramble
#

That realistic grass isnt realistic, is that valid? lol

delicate dove
#

doubt it, better write a good argument

gloomy bramble
#

hahaha

#

I got it for $10, so not too worried, just wondering the process

summer jacinth
#

The process is quite difficult if its not really a valid reason

#

Most of the time the only valid reason is that the item is broken, or does not function as advertised

#

But even then, Epic advises the creator to fix the issues before theyll offer a refund

gloomy bramble
#

Ahh so no use then

thorny zenith
#

there is someone put a really realastic grass for free on his youtube channel because he reach some milestone in subscribers

#

want a link ?

gloomy bramble
#

Nah i already bought like 4 nature packs to find something decent ๐Ÿ˜›

thorny zenith
#

just check it out you might like it a bought a lot before but this one really decent ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

gloomy bramble
#

Hmm not really into that style of grass, but cheers ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

tender flame
gloomy bramble
#

Yes

#

Anything on market place can be used commercially.

delicate dove
#

Answer it S-ed

#

I'll accept the answer :p

gloomy bramble
#

Did that military base get taken off UE4?

#

From like 4.10

#

hmm

tender flame
#

@gloomy bramble Okay. Thanks. Because I wasn't sure as well. I know it was made by Quixel Lead artist, that's it.

gloomy bramble
#

๐Ÿ˜ƒ

#

Anything in learn/marketplace etc is free to use commerically.

#

As long as it's in UE4.

tender flame
#

@delicate dove Thank You too!

gloomy bramble
#

Copy pasta me

tender flame
#

@gloomy bramble Well... No one could say I've lied. ยฏ_(ใƒ„)_/ยฏ

gloomy bramble
#

haha ๐Ÿ˜„

#

Might want to explain the actual conditions

tender flame
#

BTW, there's still notice about JCB in Japanese, is it still valid?

#

I think i'll take a nap. Have a good time people!

thorny zenith
#

when will @sleek egret go online T_T

supple moon
#

@gloomy bramble A lot of the grass I have run across on the MP is made in such a way that it looks like 1 meter high blades, and needs really high density to look right

#

That being said I have not tried all the grass

gloomy bramble
#

ive tried heaps of packs lol

supple moon
#

Might be easier to make your own, grass is pretty easy

gloomy bramble
#

Using "nature set" atm

#

I only use marketplace ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

#

Spent like $2,500 there hahah

#

I'm not an artist

supple moon
#

o.o

gloomy bramble
#

Out of all of them, this is the best so far

#

For grass

#

๐Ÿ˜„

#

I mix and mash lots of different packs

silver moat
#

@gloomy bramble I have a grass pack on Gumroad that was rejected on marketplace.
https://gumroad.com/l/hzgue

thorny zenith
#

everyone go make grass pack now !!! ๐Ÿ˜„

gloomy bramble
#

Can I get a sample kappa

#

Why was it rejected?

silver moat
#

For lack of quality and quantity as always.

gloomy bramble
#

wtf?

zealous ibex
#

:(

gloomy bramble
#

looks better than that realistic grass bs i bought lol

#

Might actually grab that @silver moat

#

Whats perf like?

silver moat
#

GTX 970 @1080p.

gloomy bramble
#

ok

#

Ooh you did military base too

#

Was going to pick that up

#

" Feeling depressed? Buy Affordable Landscapes 2"

uncut ferry
#

I wonder why there aren't more animals on the marketplace

gloomy bramble
#

There are tons

#

They're just expensive and HQ ๐Ÿ˜„

uncut ferry
#

where do you see tons? there are exactly 6 animals, all from the same guy

gloomy bramble
#

gIm?

uncut ferry
#

yeah

gloomy bramble
#

thats what i was thinking of

uncut ferry
#

take a look at the unity marketplace, then you know what tons means

gloomy bramble
#

I'd rather not get cancer

ebon leaf
#

I'd love to see more animals. My guess is the time vs. reward on the marketplace of animating animals is the reason we don't see more

gloomy bramble
#

The marketplace has grown heaps just in the last year.

#

It's just a matter of time

uncut ferry
ebon leaf
#

that turtle is badass

#

even though, technically I think it's a tortoise? ๐Ÿ˜›

#

they say they have animations but no vides... makes it hard to judge the animation quality =/

uncut ferry
#

but why is he not selling them on the MP? the quality of those seems to be great, but its so cheap that I wouldnt be sure if he actually is the original author

ebon leaf
#

yeah the quality is really good 0.o that croc is awesome

uncut ferry
#

yeah he has a yt channel, and the animations are really, really good

ebon leaf
#

i wonder if maybe they didn't meet epic's standards for some silly reason

uncut ferry
#

but there has to be some reason why he is selling off them so cheap

ebon leaf
uncut ferry
#

well I wouldnt buy those, too expensive. the price is good, but I have no use for soemthing like 75 animations.

#

walk and idle is all I need

#

it looks awesome

ebon leaf
#

I believe there's a clause in the seller agreement allowing epic to remove shit that doesn't sell or something

delicate dove
#

he's not selling them on the marketplace because.. well that tree pack alone is free model content he got from elsewhere.

ebon leaf
#

so... maybe the animals that were removed because they were too expensive for people to buy

uncut ferry
#

no, epic would not remvoe anything because of too expensive. if it was removed, then due to the seller wanting to remove it

ebon leaf
#

that turtle doesn't seemt o be of the same level of quality as the croc lol

delicate dove
#

or if seller broke rules

ebon leaf
#

I imagine that if something didn't sell at all, after some time epic would probably remove it... though I have no proof of that lol

#

If a seller broke rules all of his packs would be removed, wouldn't it?

uncut ferry
#

I might remember reading that gim somewhere said that they removed some stuff because they no longer felt it was the same quality like the other stuff, but not sure if I really read that

delicate dove
#

thats true

heady moth
#

Depends what the rule is

#

if a pack violates some asset requirements, only that pack

delicate dove
#

i do remember something about this seller and the marketplace though, cant remember what though

heady moth
#

but if it's a general rule I'd image all packs affected by it

delicate dove
#

wasnt it that he ripped the female mannequin or so?

ebon leaf
#

I doubt that Epic would notice that an asset doesn't meet the requirements once it's released ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

heady moth
#

Hmm I don't know too much about that, but if that'd be the case I would remove all of it as I'd not trust packs by that seller anymore

delicate dove
#

people who buy it can complain about the content pepe

#

wouldnt be the first time a pack got removed after it being pubbed

ebon leaf
#

or @delicate dove informs epic that they missed something like PBR standards or somethign ๐Ÿ˜›

delicate dove
#

<_<

ebon leaf
#

๐Ÿ˜„

delicate dove
#

i havent checked out any packs recently, too busy

uncut ferry
#

@delicate dove GiM only makes animals, what female mannequin you mean?

ebon leaf
#

the one on that gumroad page you linked I think

delicate dove
#

yea lol

uncut ferry
#

but then the other stuff luos said about something being removed from Mp doesnt make sense, that sellfy guy never made anything for MP

delicate dove
#

the free female mannequin thats 0,90,-

#

like i said, i remember there was some reason for them not being on the marketplace

#

but i cant remember exactly what

#

i think he was fed up with how the marketplace was handled back then

uncut ferry
#

@delicate dove but we talked about why some GiM animals were removed from the MP, so you then talking about the other animal maker is confusing

delicate dove
#

yea i mustve missed a few lines hehe

uncut ferry
#

yeah ๐Ÿ˜„

delicate dove
uncut ferry
#

well 0.90 is definitely cheap

delicate dove
#

still funny

uncut ferry
#

whats funny?

delicate dove
#

free content for 90 cents

uncut ferry
#

where is it free?

delicate dove
#

it says so in the title

#

ue4 female mannequin for free

#

90 cents

uncut ferry
#

oh ๐Ÿ˜›

ebon leaf
#

lol

uncut ferry
#

didnt notice that

delicate dove
#

its basically free though

#

but still

#

OCD and all

uncut ferry
#

I dont really understand why this guy is doing this the way he does

#

7 animals including animations for $30, but then not even make a single video showing anything, also not creating a thread about it in the forums or anything like that

elfin plinth
#

@uncut ferry hmmm, they have for other animals

#

although I don't get why put such a short video

uncut ferry
#

@elfin plinth yes, he has more

elfin plinth
#

those vids are just few seconds

uncut ferry
#

and those that he has videos of are super awesome

ebon leaf
#

someone else buy them and then tell me why I shouldn't :p

uncut ferry
#

either he's super bad with promoting his stuff or something else is wrong

ebon leaf
#

maybe it's just a kid or something and he doesn't get the value... or maybe he lives in a country with low cost of living or something shrugs

elfin plinth
#

hard to tell from the short clips, I'd be suspicious though

#

can't find any decent video of the old mixamo animals

#

they had horses and dogs at least

uncut ferry
#

mixamo had animals?

elfin plinth
#

yeah, they removed them when the service went free

uncut ferry
#

why?

elfin plinth
#

many were asking after them but they didn't want to put them back

#

probably because adobe just wanted fuse etc

#

and fuse is just humanoids

#

their animation service is basically what they promote fuse with

summer jacinth
#

Maybe hes not promoting them for UE4 because he originally makes them for some other engine and just ports them over?

gloomy bramble
#

@silver moat bought your pack fingers crossed its what im after

thorny zenith
#

@gloomy bramble i hope it's what you looking for man you spend a lot on this XD

gloomy bramble
#

lol

#

turns out..

#

not really what i want

#

rip another $30

#

lmao

thorny zenith
#

srsly just go make your own

gloomy bramble
#

I'm not an artist lol

thorny zenith
#

it's not super hard to learn you know

gloomy bramble
#

and i dont exactly know what I want either haha so its hard

thorny zenith
#

try to edit what you got at least to fit with your workflow

#

if you don't know what you want you will never find it o.o

gloomy bramble
#

o.o

#

I'm playing around until i get what i like haha

thorny zenith
#

hmm the best grass i ever saw before was on landscape auto material

#

i think you bought that already

#

since it's so popular

gloomy bramble
#

I think im kinda happy with this..

#

idk

thorny zenith
#

it looks good really

#

racing game ?

gloomy bramble
#

No post apoc survival haha

#

This is with @silver moat 's grass

thorny zenith
#

well it's good

#

just make sure it's not expansive

gloomy bramble
#

It is a lil

snow mirage
#

@gloomy bramble what grass is that in the first screen?

gloomy bramble
#

Umm

#

nature set

timber lintel
#

But it's nothing for low end hardware.

zealous ibex
#

It sais cinematic in the title, so it makes sense it's more for arch vis / filmmking / look good games, which aren't generally aimed at shitty hardware

#

But man does it look amazing

west tide
#

that is some fine grass

#

altough the wind effect looks a bit unrealistic for me (too regular)

heady moth
zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ‘ awesome @heady moth

heady moth
#

Thanks :)

paper wadi
flint snow
#

looks cool @heady moth

heady moth
#

@sleek egret, @proven lily I just noticed in "Payout Information" that there's a currency setting, but can't seem to adjust it within the panel, is there a way to change this to EUR? Or is that just per information so we know it arrives in USD?

sleek egret
#

It's so you know it arrives in USD

heady moth
#

Thanks :)

sleek egret
#

No problem

tribal jackal
#

Quick question, I'm planning on making a Minimalist UI package where it comes with a bunch of different elements for different types of games and of course, I'll make it so it's modular and can be used in combination for any type of game. Any opinions or ideas on this? I plan on making a few templates/widget blueprints so people can start implementing stuff right after importing.

delicate dove
#

hey @sleek egret is it okay if marketplace content starts in a folder named "Marketplace"
that would make for a much cleaner project if everyone would do it.

tribal jackal
#

^ I second that suggestion

gaunt flicker
#

I suggest all mp assets should pass Linter with 0 errors 0 warnings

#

And/or there should be an approved MP Linter profile

#

We have the technology

heady moth
#

Would indeed be much cleaner when integrating

zealous ibex
#

But that would force everyone to buy a maketplace asset etc first ๐Ÿ˜›

#

I mean it would be very odd to require a 3rd party tool which wasen't made by epic to submit to the marketplace, especially if that tool is charged ๐Ÿ˜› But it would have a point yeah

#

And linter is worth the money from what I've seen of it ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

gaunt flicker
#

I'm not saying it wouldn't be annoying and inconvienent

#

BUT

#

So is being rejected for arbitrary reasons

#

And so is messy assets

zealous ibex
#

True

#

For BP's we have the human linter, @abstract hatch tho ๐Ÿ˜›

gaunt flicker
#

#AutomateEverything

ebon leaf
#

@gaunt flicker why does your styleguide advises not to use blueprint macro libraries? And I feel your "Prefer ..." notes should've a reason aswell. They just look like your personal opinion and your personal opinion doesn't have a place in a styleguide.

gaunt flicker
#

@ebon leaf 'Prefer' usually means theres some reasonable exception I should write down but didn't

#

BP Macro Libaries lead to corruption / recompile loops / general slowdown / hard to maintain issues

#

BP Function libraries are farrr better

ebon leaf
#

thought something like that

gaunt flicker
#

Also, #OpenSource #ForkAndMerge

ebon leaf
#

and why would you adive to use S_ instead of SM_ for static meshes? SM_ makes it much more obvious what it is.

gaunt flicker
#

Because I'm old and every client/company/project I've worked for/with/on since UE3 uses that convention including Epic (they flip flop a lot)

#

And you're actually only the 2nd person to ask about that

#

Most people take issue with not making Meshes/Materials folders

ebon leaf
#

that's the reason for all of the "Prefer .." notes?

gaunt flicker
#

If there is a 'prefer' in a prefix/suffix row, its because 95% of paid work I do uses the preference but there is an acknowledgement of that 5% and more indie people

#

When people employ the style guide, they generally fork it and edit those out and stick to one

#

At the end of the day, it is Gamemakin LLC's style guide, and as the first principles explain, its not the universal answer

#

But it is my answer, and if the biggest takeaway is to 'have an answer, even if its a different one'

#

Mission accomplished

ebon leaf
#

I would like the style guide more if you'd say the respective prefix is more often used instead of which one to prefer ๐Ÿ˜›

gaunt flicker
#

Aye, will probably remove those prefers

ebon leaf
#

Make a copy of the guide, ctrl f and replace all ๐Ÿ˜› easy ๐Ÿ˜›

gaunt flicker
#

Also, there are a lot of decisions that are made just because a decision has to be made

#

Many things people ask about 'why is this done'

#

'thats because thats just the way its done'

#

ยฏ_(ใƒ„)_/ยฏ

#

I encourage people to do more in-depth write ups

#

And submit them as pull requests and things

#

I find that most of the time though, when I ask people to do that, they just go, 'nah I'll switch to that since its already written'

ebon leaf
#

Just noticing a pack following your style guide won't even get approved to the marketplace ๐Ÿ˜„

lucid osprey
#

so i just push this here

#

i hope someone needs that :3

thorny zenith
#

guys is there anyway i can get help through the process of submitting my asset to the marketplace been 3 days i'm searching for someone to help me :/

delicate dove
#

whats the problem?

thorny zenith
#

i read the guide on : https://publish.unrealengine.com/submission-guidelines
but still so many unanswered questions
1- can i use the asset from epic games in my project like the starter animations and the weapons from the shootergame just to show my blueprints acutally working for the one that buying them
2-which thing i should and shouldn't focus on doing so my asset doesn't get rejected like many people out there
3-how much epic games take per sell
4-im using kubold cover animset i remove them now before i place my asset on the market and i will make video for people who have the animset to place them to the cover system when they buy it
should i say my asset work better with kubold animset should i just make the cover system uses normal starter pack so the approve it i will be appreciate the help a lot
and thanks in advance

ebon leaf
#
  1. Focus on readability of blueprints, ensuring everything is neat and commented and properly put into functions and macros where it suits
#
  1. epic take 30% of each sale
#
  1. yes you can say that. As long as it is still useable without kubold's animset (as marketplace content cannot rely on other contents like that) and you state that clearly
thorny zenith
#

@ebon leaf thanks a lot if i know i will get answered here that fast i'm gonna ask 3 days ago xD thanks a lot

ebon leaf
#

haha no worries ๐Ÿ˜› the other thing I'll say - be prepared to have to make changes and resubmit your asset. Most people seem to not meet the guidelines now, which is largely because there is no clearly defined guidelines available and they tend to vary a little fromt ime to time. Don't get discouraged if you get told it didn't meet standards, just take the time to make the changes (hopefully they will give you some useful feedback, if not ask for it) and resubmit.

zealous ibex
#

There are 2 guidelines ๐Ÿ˜›

#

Which sucks

ebon leaf
#

Two things that seem to be constant issues - always include a demo level and always include a tutorial blueprint that shows users how to use your content

#

@zealous ibex Even those two guidelines don't cover everything that they bring up though ๐Ÿ˜›

zealous ibex
#

True lol

#

Tutorial BPs are a plain

#

*pain and I Hate them now lol

delicate dove
#

dat repetativeness on that cliff tower ruins

#

im sorry, but thats beginner content

#

also @sleek egret Cruddy (its creator) isnt exactly friendly when it comes to replying to critique.

west tide
#

@delicate dove And it is geometry tiling โ‰ - just why? so you can't even fix it with a better material...
Why is this featured?

delicate dove
#

ยฏ_(ใƒ„)_/ยฏ

#

lol that derped hard

#

there

zealous ibex
#

Yeah his response to critique seems a bit unprofessional, but why would we have to slate him?

oak fiber
#

is this the place to bash people for their content and (un)?? professional attitude? I had no idea.

delicate dove
#

both the marketplace people and most of us want to keep the standard of content on the marketplace high, and something like that, especially for the price it is, should not have been allowed on the marketplace.

oak fiber
#

but you dont run the marketplace?

#

so?

delicate dove
#

and one can be removed from the marketplace if they do not respond with proper attitude to costumers

oak fiber
#

you are now bashing their choice of selecting it for the MP as well?

#

the hell sense/logic is this?

zealous ibex
#

I agree the tiling is a bit off, but for the rest the pack looks pretty sick in my opinion

delicate dove
#

you dont have to agree with me, thats fine. just giving my opinion.

oak fiber
#

so if I dont like someones attitude they should be removed?

zealous ibex
#

And yeah, I agree he may need to hear something from epic about how he replies, but calling it beginner content is unprofessionnal

oak fiber
#

sounds like a fun time for us out here to vote loud mouth people who bash others for no reason then they dont have something to do all day?

zealous ibex
#

(and with hearing I mean a warning, not being removed)

delicate dove
#

anybody with at least some experience wouldntm ake it tile that bad.

oak fiber
#

Says who?

zealous ibex
#

Also make the geometry just as good etc?

oak fiber
#

the mental police?

delicate dove
#

im not debating this, again. just giving opinion. let steph/adam decide in the end. though, wouldnt be the first time content would be removed after critique from people in this chat.

oak fiber
#

Dont debate, debate, do whatever you want.
But dont expect just cause you dislike the way someone speaks or responds, that that means their content or work should be diminished.

zealous ibex
#

im sorry, but thats beginner content doesn't sound like an opinion tho

#

(just my 2 cents)

oak fiber
#

you dont like it? Fine, tell people. Asking to remove a person because of their answers? Sounds like you need to just press the "pass over" button and let others know in a more non-business specific area your gripe. Otherwise it really sounds more like a petty whine

delicate dove
#

not to mention that way prior to him releasing it, there where already people telling him to try and fix the tiling. yet, didnt do anything with it.

oak fiber
#

and yet IT WAS APPROVED

#

again, you are missing the point

#

if the system is approving this

#

then the system is bad

#

not the ppl putting shit into it

delicate dove
#

again, wouldnt be the first time content gets removed after it being approved

oak fiber
#

again, has shit to do with what you are attempting to do here.

#

you didnt bash it on content alone

delicate dove
#

ยฏ_(ใƒ„)_/ยฏ

tribal jackal
#

Personally, I kind of agree with Luos.

#

I could make a material and create dozens and dozens of static meshes that have a simple material with a cube projection UV unwrap; but honestly, it'll have flaws.

oak fiber
#

agreement doesnt mean its right, so agree away.

tribal jackal
#

Sounds like you're the creator of the asset lol, but I won't start drama.

oak fiber
#

I have zero assets on this marketplace

zealous ibex
#

I have 1 unrelated asset, I just feel like the wya he is putting his opinion seems like he is stating stuff like a fact and just bashing the content, but then again that's just my 2 cents

#

But honestly, it could easily be fixed with an update by the creator right? So why try and get it removed, all he needs is a polite warning about the manner in which the creator replies to comments and perhaps a request to take a look at the tiling.

tribal jackal
#

Well, for sure it can be fixed, but it'll probably take some time

zealous ibex
#

True

tribal jackal
#

Because if I'm guessing correctly, it's fairly simple meshes with the material

#

Now don't get me wrong, the material looks nice, but it can probably be done more effectively with different materials overlapped on top. Because it looks like it's just one mesh and one material, nothing really fancy ๐Ÿ˜›

oak fiber
#

but to your point a bit, this is a trap. Buying an asset on the MP, being able to pick it apart, and in hindsight say, oh, that was really easy to do, why did this cost so much? Or, why was this really a product in the first place?.... is a horrible way to actually "critic" anything

tribal jackal
#

Oh I'm not really crtiquing it, I'm just pointing out the facts or the workflow he might've went to to make this asset

oak fiber
#

IOW, because you understand the solution better now, or how to solve a problem, doesnt diminish the work someone did

#

even if you dont like their "attitude" of answers on their own product.

tribal jackal
#

I don't think I spoke about his attitude.

neat nexus
#

"The customer is always right." That is helpful to remember when trying to sell.

tribal jackal
#

In fact I don't even think I mentioned his attitude

cinder sable
#

and... if his product is crap, simply do not buy it. No need to get it removed.

wicked pebble
#

Customer is never right ๐Ÿคฃ

tribal jackal
#

Plus the price is indeed a bit crazy; but what @cinder sable said is definitely correct

oak fiber
#

@cinder sable exactly that.

neat nexus
#

"if his product is crap, simply do not buy it" The invisible hand of the marketplace at work ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

cinder sable
#

^^

oak fiber
#

imagine that

cinder sable
#

Not sure we need a marketplace police here in chat.

wicked pebble
#

@cinder sable If the product is crap, it should be removed until it isn't crap. The marketplace has high standards, and somethings slip, but still should be caught.

tribal jackal
#

But... At the same time however, the marketplace itself wants all assets to hold a certain quality, but I won't continue the discussion, just here to put my input haha

oak fiber
#

@neat nexus and that is not a truism in any sense. Customers are not always right, nor is buisness.

delicate dove
#

we already mentioned and tried to help him improve the repetativeness

cinder sable
#

@bleak ice Perhaps. but, we as the consumer do need to understand quaility or lack of.... WE the purchaser does bare some responsibility.

oak fiber
#

and then attacked his business responses

delicate dove
#

and while he can decide to not do anything with it

cinder sable
#

do=does

delicate dove
#

you can expect getting some shit if you ignore it, and then try to sell it

neat nexus
#

That is the whole point of the saying, "The customer is always right." It doesn't matter if it is true or not.

wicked pebble
#

Are you tagging me, or Jack from pine fire studios, @cinder sable ? ๐Ÿคฃ

oak fiber
#

Caveat Emptor and Caveat Vendor. They say both, because it IS BOTH

cinder sable
#

ack!

tribal jackal
#

Also note that the word 'quality' is a fairly focused thing in the Submission Guidelines (I just read it recently since I want to submit something haha)

oak fiber
#

@neat nexus perhaps in a world of #altfacts?

cinder sable
#

then, Epic should enforce the standards they set forth. its their MP.

oak fiber
#

^

wicked pebble
#

Anyway, if your asset is subpar, and it slips through the cracks and is submitted, good for you, but the minute people catch on, and report it to epic, that's when it needs to be removed.

neat nexus
#

No, the point of the saying, which is a quite old one, is that the customer has the money, so if you want to sell to them, you have to treat them like they are right.

wicked pebble
#

Epic relies on its people, and the people rely on epic. It's a two way street.

#

The assets seen in that, are definitely not worth $100, as far as quality, presentation, and customer service show.

tribal jackal
#

"When a developer makes a decision to purchase Marketplace content, they want to feel confident that the content is as advertised and that the creator will help them with any problems they might have with it. People usually trust people they like, and having a good reputation for being a professional on the forums and in email correspondence greatly improves confidence. This can have a direct effect on your success."

At the end of the day, it all comes down to the seller, if people are skeptical about the product and the seller doesn't seem to comply to this, they won't make any sales, simple as that, really. But the final decision comes down to Epic if they want to continue having the asset on the Marketplace or not.

oak fiber
#

@wicked pebble yes, agreed. Report assets, not attitudes.

delicate dove
#

attitudes are also part of the package.

oak fiber
#

no they arent.

tribal jackal
#

There's a reason why you're not selling anything on the marketplace @oak fiber

oak fiber
#

unless he is being a flaming racist or some language that is just incidiary

#

he aint

delicate dove
#

if as seller goes gtfo, then epic will be inclined to either warn the person, or kick them from the marketplace

cinder sable
#

@delicate dove Nah... Because I can read the comments and go..."That dudes an ass..." and no purchase. I do not need a MP police on that.

oak fiber
#

you dont like his tude

#

get over it

delicate dove
#

its one of the rules of the marketplace

oak fiber
#

I am only practicing what you are asking Epic to do

delicate dove
#

conduct in a professional manner to potential customers

wicked pebble
#

@cinder sable So you're saying you wouldn't buy something because of attitude? Sounds like that IS part of the package.

oak fiber
#

yes, then do it yourself @delicate doved

cinder sable
#

@delicate dove I agree, the dude was rude, but...really, you think he should be removed because of those comments?

delicate dove
#

im not talking as a seller

tribal jackal
#

Oh no, not because of the comments, because of the quality haha

oak fiber
#

you didnt need to do anything other than call out the asset and in a PM point out his attitude. You literally pulled this out into a public space to call someone out on their buisness response

cinder sable
#

@wicked pebble I'm saying that if I saw comments like the guy did in the asset we're talking about, I don't think I would purchase, regardless of how good it was.

tribal jackal
#

Well this is a public Discord and a channel to discuss the Marketplace?

delicate dove
#

if you have a problem or critique about any of my packages I will either solve the issue asap, or take the advice and build upon it

tribal jackal
#

"Authors and customers are both encouraged to share their experiences."

oak fiber
#

and we are

wicked pebble
#

So again, you're saying it's part of the package.. ๐Ÿคฃ

oak fiber
#

good for you

tribal jackal
#

We're technically just discussing our experience, just a professional discussion

oak fiber
#

not everyone is YOU

#

congrats

tribal jackal
#

???

oak fiber
#

@delicate dove

cinder sable
#

Right, Jackie... And? What did I miss.

oak fiber
#

11:47 AM] Luos: if you have a problem or critique about any of my packages I will either solve the issue asap, or take the advice and build upon it

wicked pebble
#

Luos - Today at 3:45 PM if as seller goes gtfo, then epic will be inclined to either warn the person, or kick them from the marketplace teak421 - Today at 3:45 PM @Luos Nah... Because I can read the comments and go..."That dudes an ass..." and no purchase. I do not need a MP police on that.

oak fiber
#

that is your business sense, good for you, not everyone conducts business as you do.

cinder sable
#

Right!

#

And?

#

I do not need someone from Epic to remove it from the MP.

#

I can do myself.

#

and not purchase.

oak fiber
#

skip

wicked pebble
#

You can remove the content from mp?

cinder sable
#

no. I would simply not purchase.

#

Others are advocating that it be removed because the guy is rude. I disagree.

wicked pebble
#

Right, so endofacto, the product gets removed.

cinder sable
#

No.

wicked pebble
#

No sales == removal of product.

cinder sable
#

Because, others might not care that the guy is rude.

#

I do care...

wicked pebble
#

Everyone cares if a seller is rude, unless it's that cute type of rude that really doesn't bug you because you know the person is a sweetheart deep down.

oak fiber
#

depends. If I never speak to them?

cinder sable
#

Jackie, this is self-policing!! perfect! We do not need Epic to take down. problem solved.

oak fiber
#

you prolly buy from a lot of racist people all day, and you never know

#

thought police?

wicked pebble
#

they can be racist, and not verbal, and no one would ever know, but if it's out, everyone will jump on the case. ยฏ_(ใƒ„)_/ยฏ

oak fiber
#

unless the dude is advocating violence or a ranting cuss stream, ?

#

everyone?

wicked pebble
#

People for, and people against.

oak fiber
#

how can everyone jump on them if everyone includes them

#

and people who dont care?

#

lots of those too

wicked pebble
#

Now you're just nitpicking ๐Ÿคฃ

oak fiber
#

no, its just reality

cinder sable
#

^

oak fiber
#

I give you Trump

wicked pebble
#

ยฏ_(ใƒ„)_/ยฏ

oak fiber
#

50%/50% and 50%

#

๐Ÿ˜„

cinder sable
#

Trump is the new Hitler by the way... <grins> when it gets to that point, we should quit. hehe

wicked pebble
#

ยฏ_(ใƒ„)_/ยฏ

delicate dove
#

hehe, amazing. you used your Trump card

wicked pebble
#

@delicate dove God damnit leaves

tribal jackal
#

Guys, a little bit off topic.

oak fiber
#

it seems to come out when someone starts a discussion with hate

wicked pebble
#

Oh my lord, I give up ๐Ÿคฃ

tacit python
#

are there any epic staff on here?

delicate dove
#

there are, but they might not reply untill they are back in the office.

tacit python
#

well this is awkward

#

bbl

tribal jackal
silver moat
#

Hello

#

It's been 3 days I'm seeing 1 refund every day on a specific package without having received any emails.

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ˜ฆ

#

I'd message Stephanie / send marketplace-support an email, seems really odd ๐Ÿ˜ฆ

west tide
#

@oak fiber and @delicate dove sorry, I did not want to start such a heated discussion yesterday ;)
While I do think it is a good thing that there is some kind of quality control for the marketplace, I do not care if someone wants to sell such an asset for such a high price. Judging from the comments and the forum, there are obviously people who like the asset, so good for them.
I was just a bit perplexed that something that looks objectively not good is picked as a featured item. That makes it look like EPIC is just rolling dice to pick a featured asset, which is an issue that we should be able to discuss here.
The other thing where Luos has a point is that rudeness from a seller should not be tolerated because it reflects bad on the marketplace as a whole. Customers should feel good when browsing the marketplace and they should have some sense of trust in it. If they just feel insulted then they will probably not come back.

zealous ibex
#

Agreed on that ๐Ÿ‘

ebon leaf
#

Likewise

tacit python
#

I want to weigh in on this

#

there is some real shovelware on the epic marketplace. i don't care for a lot of it. that's fine because i don't have to buy it but i think there's a double standard going on

#

with that castle cliffs pack it's pretty clear that the demo level shouldn't be critiqued, that's just stupid and shows that the people critiquing it are talking our their asses.

#

then again it's a $99 prop pack with not that many items and it didn't look very 'modular' as pertains to the epic guidelines. it's not clear how much of it slots together.

#

to be honest i liked the showcase rocks more but whatever, i'm not buying it myself.

#

but he's not a bad seller, just overly optimistic

#

what makes me fucking mad is the really low quality, easily replicable stuff

#

the things that look nice, you buy them, then they turn out to be nothing more than an afternoon's work of messing around with tutorials

#

or worse just generic repetitive shit

#

pulling him or her off the marketplace would be a good start

#

it's even overpriced, but just enough to make you think there's some hidden value, but there isn't

#

I think if a pack gets to be six months old and doesn't get rated then it needs to come down

#

it's pretty telling

zealous ibex
#

Now let's not slate @delicate dove, please

#

we don't wanna cause world war 3

tacit python
#

i don't care, i see that guy attacking other sellers behind their backs all the time, but he's literally one of the worst offenders

#

rant done

#

I'm going to continue my complaint with Epic

#

for you, the people

zealous ibex
#

True, and I do think luos may be a bit direct, but I don't think his stuff is low-quality tutorial BS

#

Just my opinion tho

tacit python
#

those particles definitely are

ebon leaf
#

Not really... even the most popular of packs have a rating attachment rate of like 2 or 3%. Also, I would suggest perhaps tryingt o word your points a little less agressively. Lous is by no means a bad artist IMO either, and I don't really understand how you can say that the cliff pack shouldn't be critiqued? I don't particularly agree with all the comments about that pack, but nothing is immune to criticism IMO. Lous does often point out issues with other people's packs, however the things he point out are usually breaches of the marketplace guidelines, such as materials not being PBR and such.

tacit python
#

I said the showcase parts of the cliff pack aren't worth critiquing

#

that's not what you're paying for so who cares? like I said, total lack of comprehension on the part of the critics

#

attack its price point and lack of content instead

ebon leaf
#

The showcase is all we have to go by if we don't own the product so my point stands.

tacit python
#

if you're in doubt look at the overview screenshot

#

it's limited

#

it's not

#

you're just not very familiar with what you're critcizing. I don't own it and even I can use my eyes to look at the content

#

maybe this is why you guys specifically have no hand in selecting marketplace content for removal.

ebon leaf
#

lol? We are sellers, we don't have a hand in selecting content for removal because that's nothing to do with us.

tacit python
#

reading this room, you could have fooled me. aren't you guys the self-appointed body corporate for living in the marketplace gated community?

#

curtain twitchers and old biddies, the lot of you

ebon leaf
#

lol okay... if you have such a problem with the conversations in this channel, which have resulted in numerous positive changes for the marketplace as a whole, just don't pay attention. However, if you want to actually participate in discussion learn how to do so without resorting to name calling and aggression.

west tide
#

@tacit python why are you so aggressive? Your rant seems self-contradicting and I do not get the point you are trying to make.

heady moth
ebon leaf
#

If you have a problem with a specific seller's approach to helping epic enforce quality standards accross the board, then take it up with Epic and/or the seller in person and do it in a respectful manner. Don't come in here and rant your mouth off and expect people to take you seriously.

zealous ibex
#

Why aren't you saying that to luos tho?

west tide
#

Indeed.

zealous ibex
#

Sorry to say this, but luos did the same against the prop sellor

#

(about the ranting part)

ebon leaf
#

I wasn't here for the conversation about the cliffs, nor do I catch up on conversations in here if they are longer than a handful of messages so I can't really comment. I saw a conversation with one or two people saying that the cliff pack looked repetative much earlier, before changes were made to it. So I can't really comment on that

zealous ibex
#

True

#

Your forgiven ๐Ÿ˜›

ebon leaf
#

Like I said above - I don't agree with all the criticisms I've seen posted against that pack - I think it needs a little variance in the tiling but overall seems okay enough to me, though over priced for what it offers. But if ANYONE is in here talking like that about anyone else... I'm more than happy to call them out on it ๐Ÿ˜› not that I have any power in here but yeah

zealous ibex
#

๐Ÿ‘

ebon leaf
#

In my experience, Lous can be a little forward sometimes, but usually has a good point behind it. But obviously I've not seen every convo he is in.

#

No one benefits from angry rants, regardless of who is perpetrating it towards what lol

#

anyways, I should be working ๐Ÿ˜›

zealous ibex
#

Have fun ๐Ÿ˜‰

ebon leaf
#

Fighting with UE bugs ๐Ÿ˜› of course I will

zealous ibex
#

xD

ebon leaf
#

@ebon leaf A little forward? He sits around with a god complex thinking that he is the dogs bollocks, belittles peoples products and places his own onto a pedestal

west tide
#

@ebon leaf Can't we all be a little more civil and not attack each other in open chat? Even if what you said were true, people are able to make their own judgement about these sort of things. This is helping nobody.

tacit python
#

the irony is painful

#

they must find one of us in the wreckage brother

ebon leaf
#

@west tide Simply stating a fact as when Luos decides on going on with his rants, he is unopposed. You know you could always use the search function and have a look then request Luos to be more civil and to prevent attacking, I'll wait for your message to inform him.

tacit python
#

the fire rises

#

because that was a sick burn

ebon leaf
#

@ebon leaf I'm not trying to defend Lous. You can take allt he issue with whatever he said you like - as I said I wasn't here for the discussion. The issue is that people are going on angry tirades here that aren't really helpful to anyone. If Lous did indeed overstep the line then fine - call him out on it. From what I understand now someone did and that went poorly so fine, take it up with the moderators in here, or Lous himself. But don't rage about it in these channels because it's just not helpful.

tacit python
#

so you're saying it's fine? because we're calling him out on it.

#

I kid. I have a genuine problem with the quality of his assets

#

and my opinion surely carries as much weight as his

#

I think we can all work together to resolve this behind his back

ebon leaf
#

Again, his messages and insults remained unmoderated yet anyone such as me who will speak about the gods honest truth is suddenly reminded that I must be civil, I must use a system of moderation.

tacit python
#

luos style

#

it's called gatekeeping @ebon leaf

#

they wish to limit who can hold and voice an opinion

ebon leaf
#

If you guys just want to ignore the conversation that we are trying to have with you and continue to play the victims go for it.

tacit python
#

to be fair money is involved, it makes sense

quaint cedar
#

Hm

tacit python
#

next we'll be accused of acting like vict... ooooooh. you beat me to it.

ebon leaf
#

Is it really playing the victim? It's a reaction to an action, wouldn't be classified as a victim but more of and offender at this stage

tacit python
#

honestly this is a place to interface with epic staff. I'd hate to think that it was only available to some.

ebon leaf
#

an reaction against an action can be justified in the correct context

tacit python
#

we're either an open forum or we're holding court. someone choose.

#

an equal but opposite action can reaction the einstein of the newtonian inaction.

#

I was born in the dark. I didn't see the light until I was a man.

quaint cedar
#

My goodness. It's Sunday, stop the noise already

zealous ibex
#

Several people are typing...

ebon leaf
#

@tacit python this is an open place to interface with the community, not Epic. Epic, however, do participate int hat community here. Again - the issue I am having is the language and tone used, not the content.

#

@tacit python be careful, @quaint cedar a moderator is here who is with @heady moth who teams up for jams and more with @delicate dove on regular occasion, you're about to see far left politics occur at any moment now

quaint cedar
#

We got your point. It's getting boring

tacit python
#

@ebon leaf stop gatekeeping.

quaint cedar
#

Blame people as much as you want. Everyone here can call out sellers for bad quality and attitude

tacit python
#

let's see this for what it is, privileged access to epic controlled by community members whose role has been reduced to political games.

ebon leaf
#

@quaint cedar If only you moderated Luos like you are trying to moderate us, next time he makes such remarks I will promise to PM you and watch you act in the same manner

tacit python
#

even now I am being told to be quiet

quaint cedar
#

I'm moderating your spam

tacit python
#

so my opinions are spam?

west tide
#

Lol, what is going on? I just wanted a more civil discussion ^^
I will come back when this has calmed down.. so many emotions in here

ebon leaf
#

Who will then moderate your own spam?

quaint cedar
#

I'm fine with you telling Luos that you think his stuff is not good

tacit python
#

nobody is spamming, that's the thing

quaint cedar
#

These are just opinions

tacit python
#

but now we're qualifying opinions as valid or invalid. more gatekeeping.

#

these are not selfless acts of moderation. they are elite entitlements.

#

I wonder if epic realises their community interactions are being carefully restricted behind their backs

ebon leaf
#

this isn't epic's community lol

tacit python
#

no, but I'm sure they don't want you people telling them who they can and can't talk to here

#

that would not have been part of the deal

ebon leaf
#

no one is telling you you can't talk

#

They gave a grant for it and they have members within this unofficial community which is also been advertised on streams

tacit python
#

scroll back.

zealous ibex
#

<just a reminder to everyone tho there are epic staff, this is as @ebon leaf said an unofficial chat>

ebon leaf
#

people are asking you to stop being so angry and aggressive.

tacit python
#

I'm doing neither

ebon leaf
#

@ebon leaf yes... but that still doesn't make it their community

quaint cedar
#

Sigh

tacit python
#

you're just gatekeeping me

#

again

#

someone else has an opinion I don't like? must be aggressive.

ebon leaf
#

no

tacit python
#

if you can't handle a spirited discussion why are you building up one side of it?

#

do you need to win?

ebon leaf
#

but if someone comes in here and goes on a angry rant personally attacking someone - then that is aggressive lol

tacit python
#

you seriously need to look up the definition of gatekeeping

#

it's a negative term

#

you don't get to tell me that you find me aggressive when you're the only one disagreeing with me

ebon leaf
#

@ebon leaf advertisement of a community, investment in the community including a presence in the community. Not official but obviously supporting the community for what it is

tacit python
#

you've successfully steered the conversation away from the quality of luos's marketplace crud to your perceptions of my behaviour.

ebon leaf
#

lol I didn't disagree with you, and I'm not the only one asking you to be a bit more civil. Using the term gatekeeping is actually incorrect use of the term ๐Ÿ˜›

tacit python
#

oh you are

#

by far

#

recognise your own footsteps in the world

#

now you're gatekeeping gatekeeping

#

the hilarity

ebon leaf
#

neither then would be your, "Playing the victim"

tacit python
#

I think we need a safe space

#

quickly, hand out the safe space tape

ebon leaf
#

lol okay guys. Good work. You overcame the tyranny of the marketplace channel. Where shall we place your thrones? ๐Ÿ˜›

tacit python
#

and mockery

#

pathetic dude