New Disasters:Short, No Game Development, Commonly ends in ties.
Old Disasters:Long, Variety in Disasters, Actually Challenging, Almost Always has one winner.
#Bring back old disasters
crisp juniper
dire jungle
Why
white ridge
The current Desasters needs some adjustments mayby but not this
crisp juniper
The new disasters is garbage
Pillars of fortune is short also but theres some strategy and pvp that makes up for it
The only pvp in disasters (besides specific events) is you might knock a stupid player off a cliff
If thats the peak of the pvp, it is not fun. Also the strategy sucks.
Even Eggwars, which I think is terrible, has some strategy, even though 3 eggs will be swept in a minute.
tulip knoll
The new disasters is garbage
What do you mean.. you want bugged out tornadoes back?
tulip knoll
The only pvp in disasters (besides specific events) is you might knock a stupid ...
Theres more ways to kill players.. although I agree there could be more tools in the game for pvp.. maybe axes raining from the sky 
crisp juniper
What do you mean.. you want bugged out tornadoes back?
- Because I think a new version of a gamemode sucks, doesn't mean I'm asking to eradicate all bug fixes.
- You didn't read any of the problems with the new disasters and are using a strawman.
tulip knoll
1. Because I think a new version of a gamemode sucks, doesn't mean I'm asking to...
What other list of problems? All I see is a complaint about the length and lack of pvp.. (which its obv not intended as a full pvp combat gamemode)..
Also about the tie games.. the scoring is fully bugged actually and besides thats a separate problem from actual gameplay and developing game strat.
crisp juniper
You aren't actually having to deal with multiple disasters, just two disasters that you and many other players can easily survive