#Community Species Suggestions
1 messages · Page 106 of 1
Maevarano Formation is worthy of its own DLC
Everything bigger than a thumbtack is worthy of its own DLC, but it’s not happening
We should be more realistic
we are getting a paid dlc with quagga aurochs and equus and giant fossa is less spectacular than the thylachine?
Also, I guess we can apply this template to the only other DLC ever mentioned: Palaeozoic
We shall Pray for Messel Pit, Agate Springs,White River Formations stuff
Yes?
Morrison Formation DLC?
I’d say a bigger DLC is entirely reasonable to hope for
its bigger...
And?
Something like 6/4 or 8/2 is entirely realistic
Thylacine is a thousand times more well known than the giant fossa, both scientifically and popularly
We’re not even sure if the giant fossa is an older subspecies of fossa, or a unique species
Giant fossa also has a real if small chance of being a Lazarus taxon so
it seems like you seem to think the fossa is carrying the dlc though
Maybe for the mythical aerial/aquatic expansions
with archaoindris and voay also in there
What are you talking about?
you mentioned it specifically and its size
ELEPHANT BIRD
that to
Only because it’s the smallest
no babboon lemur would be
Oh, I guess, idk what that even is
basically what it says
not exactly
but it deserves the name
sorry
monkey lemur
overall i think we should take thylacine as smallest exhibit mammal so it fits
Monkey lemur is way bigger than the giant fossa
Body mass estimates for C. spelea range from 17 kg (37 lb) to 20 kg (44 lb)
Hadropithecus stenognathus has been estimated to have weighed between 27 and 35 kg (60 and 77 lb)
yeah hadro is massive i remembered archaeolemur which is 18-28
still bigger but not that much but damn i didnt know hadro was that huge
Hadropithecus stenognathus has been estimated to have weighed between 27 and 35 kg (60 and 77 lb) and to have been roughly as large as Archaeolemur, although more gracile.
Sounds like Archaeolemur is even heavier
on archaeolemur it said 18-28kg so idk
also theres even larger lemurs but those are fully arboreal
look up sloth lemurs
also megaladapis
They might just do one skin
but those should be fine in vivs
Great auk as habitat would be insane
genuinely the best option for auk specifically
I’d love it, but it’s hard to believe
the list starts on auk and ends with 2 viv species
I know
i think its happening
Great auk can work like penguins in planet zoo
i genuinely think they are quietely working on simple diving
It’s very possible
Maybe
starting work on it with deino makes so much sense and then auk in the 1st dlc
It’d just be the smallest habitat animal by a lot
i think with walking birds specifically we shouldnt look at weight but height
also its a coastal bird from northern regions it wont realistically have much grass in its enclosure
if we do this anything taller than laelly is okay
which auk is
and ornimegalonyx to its 1.1 meters tall thats enough
and so is dodo
not a bad idea at all
ooh
That works.
if we get exhibit auk though this means obdurodon is exhibit to? what would be the size limit for a more flat aquatic thing
because on sand they are always visible
yes but waaaaay more active and a mammal
1 dlc having a certain layout does not make it a template lol
it feels wrong....
It makes it the only known valid configuration lol
still to big for an active animal though i feel like
Sure
But that doesn't mean you should assume all other dlcs will follow
It's the size of like mononykus
if the first sells a lot maybe another will be bigger or we will get a large viv dlc
If not smaller
We can say maybes til the cows come home
I don’t, but it’s what I believe future DLC suggestions should be structured around
Doesn't really mean anything
Extremely arbitrary
basically
It’s not
It is
Trying to say "You can only use this" when said thing is the only of its kind means practically nothing
I disagree
you must take into account other factors like equus and bos are new rigs but after that the cow model is easy to re use again for example
Uh
so suggesting a new ceratopsian does not equal suggesting something that needs an entirely new model
That's a good thing to note, almost everything here is a unique rig/animation set
is what i mean
I mean, maybe?
The RE appears to be a ton of new rigs, except probably the ungulates
Idk if the thylacine can use the cats
But probably
Dodo, auk and moa presumably are new, moa may use some existing theropod
i think moa is new but aepyornis would be built from the same model
if we ever get it
Probably, although their posture is very distinct
And unlike moas, elephant birds still had wings. Not sure how much that would affect the model, but still something I figure would be worth keeping in mind.
just look at any game that has skins that change models a lot it can work and im sure they have re used models before
But I don’t believe a DLC that only reuses rigs would necessarily have more species
that we cannot answer until we get one
but if we go by 10 per dlc then would 12 be okay for my remaining viv dlcs
as no growth stages and skins are required
Isn’t it 8?
i saw someone say 8 and 2 vivs i dont remember
when they got added we got 13? so yeah 10-12 seems reasonable to me
i do love that the devs arent going the jwe route, adding stuff like the quagga that while notorious and well known isnt that special when you think about it
yeah cant wait to make a european enclosure with tarpan and aurochs included
we know what both tarpan and aurochs looked like
And for all we know, we're probably getting true wild horses and not that.
while a very controversial breed the heck cattle was bred to resemble the aurochs and we know the colours so this but bigger is roughly what wed be at
Chickenosaurus
I hope they do the other subspecies of aurochs too
its a vernacular for the extinct wild horse so it doesnt really matter
Sure it superficially looks like one but it's still domestic cattle
i just use it as similar depiction
i know its not the same
but fun fact my country has a nature reserve with heck cattle and european bison
It really does matter because there’s debate about what the term “tarpan” was applied to; wild horse or feral horse, or both, or a mix
Wild horse is far more neutral and accepted
wild horse then, anyway i wouldnt expect the skins to be to crazy
indian would be really cool
I would hope for a grullo and bay dun skin, both with striping
i think its probably just going to be 3 simple colours brown beige and maybe like prezwalskis
quagga is the striped one in the pack
I agree with Satan regarding DLC size expectations
auk is life
wild horse may have stripes in its legs tho
The colour was described as faint brown or yellowish brown with eel stripe and leg stripes, or wholly black legs. The flanks and shoulders were spotted, some of them tended to an ashy colour. They dwelled in rocky habitats and showed intelligent and fierce behaviour
so striped legs and a line on its spine
not like a zebra
I would not look at historic descriptions at all
Also regarding great auk
What about white spotted skins, like from cave arf
sounds more like a fjord horse
I can safely say repenomamus is exhibit animal now
Art
Not exactly like a zebra, but some were heavily striped. Most were more like this
i dont think they would exactly have zebra or quagga stripes id love to see a source for that
Repenomamus killing baby dinosaurs dream is alive
yeah a bit like a fjord horse
or a wild ass
im going to sacrifice humans to the auks and thylacines in my parks
W human casualties update
Some half Striped and spotted skins
Tbf, the last one may not be legitimately spotted
half triped is good just on the legs and a line down the back i thought he meant a full on zebra
How so
The spots extend outside the border of the horse
And sometimes spots mean things in Palaeolithic art
I see
although we do have modern spotted horses so its not out of the question some would have this feature
We have spotted bison, for example, which (almost) certainly didn’t exist
Genetically there’s evidence it existed, yes
That’s a domestic mutation tho
Cool
but these mutations show up in basically any wild mammal bird or reptile from time to time to
so as a speculative skin it works
A leopard complex mutation effect for horses would be cool
But I don’t want an entire skin for it
They were around for about 60 million years , which they had big range
and pied is usually the 1 that has little effect together with melanism on the animals survival chance
I think it should be slightly striped bay dun, more heavily striped grullo
Otherwise identically in form. Erect mane, big head, all the wild horse features
id say 1 basic brown that can go from shade beige to darker brown then 1 leg striped one and a dotted or pied could work nicely
Hmm , the went extinct about 1000 year ago , I think this can be considered relatively recent?
?
They’re not coming in the RE DLC
Bay dun, but does one need to be fuzzy?
I mean, when you consider some people would like to use it in cold climate setting
I guess, but it’d be weird in La Brea or Pampas
Something like this
How much is considered recent 600 years ago at most ?
Idk
Damn u quagga
Why does it matter?
3 skins not enough
I’d prefer grullo and bay dun just have modest fur
I mean the probably need temporal range to know who they will add in RE extinct dlc
Are you aware we have the RE pack species list now?
holocene?
Yeah
No
My point is I want the giant elephant bird even if it’s not in the RE DLC
Madagascar DLC is probably the best bet now
they must have some plan for madagascar
Yeah I don't think we will get any of the gaint lemurs too
They can also easily fit in any generic Pleistocene/Ice Age DLC
cant do madagascar without archaeoindris
True
Pleistocene DLC would go hard
I am not sure whether elephant bird is making in when we are making such broad themes as whole ice age tbh
I mean maybe, but it depends on other animals
I have a question about the Panthera Leo Europaea. There might be nothing niche about this species (since some claims say that it's a subspecies of the cave lion or the Asiatic lion). It's an extinct European lion species that went extinct in the Roman era.
I feel like it there's nothing special about it
2 panthera are more than enough tbh
And this bad boy
thats why i said madagascar could be 2 dlcs
also voay could just re use deino by then
not really tho. Panthera Leo Leo is an African one
Yeah , any we need some mesozoic one like dwarf sauropods
And Asian, but that's what I was asking, wasn't European lion just P.L.Leo that lived in Europe?
if we get more sauropods some more early ones would be nice as for sauropodomorpha eoraptor would be amazing
It’s probably not even valid tbh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javan_tiger what do you think about this 🤔
The Javan tiger was a Panthera tigris sondaica population native to the Indonesian island of Java. It was one of the three tiger populations that colonized the Sunda Islands during the last glacial period 110,000–12,000 years ago. It used to inhabit most of Java, but its natural habitat decreased continuously due to conversion for agricultural...
noooo
The only other Panthera I’d ever want is Panthera onca mesembrina
It’ll never come but oh well
Isn't good representation?
while panthere is a diverse genus i dont think we need almost exact copies of modern species, especially when they dont even have size to back them up
game doesnt need more cats, and if it did get more id want homotherium
Homotherium is definitely peaked third cat material
nimravids though hehe
Miracinonyx.
The first one is understandable , but I don't think size make good or no
well we do have ursus spelea
which i just think is a base model for future arctodus and arctotherium in dlc ngl
Cave bears are an iconic species, as are the lions.
thats also a factor
same with the wild horse
or aurochs
but a smaller tiger? with 2 panthera already
Peak fourth and final cat material
just feels like wasted space
We need dogs actually
this i would say is possible as its very different and closer to small cats ig
Dire wolf needs to be base game
Why
Warrah is probably not coming considering it’s not in the RE DLC
keeping my hopes up
Although it would have been cool
It’s an iconic prehistoric creature. “Need” is probably a strong word but imo it really should be base game
Because it’s super popular and there’s nothing else like it in game?
Dodo is recently extinct tho
but its to notorious to be dlc tbf
I am sure, if not RE being confirmed for long time no one would think about dodo as DLC material
man i wish they had less focus on dinos but they probably have to to even compete with jwe
I agree, but the devs have made up their mind for 8 years now
Wouldnt be surprised, if dire wolf is going to be in your average ice age DLC, america pack or something
the recently extinct dlc feels like a breath of fresh air
Would suck, but yeah
or warrah in south america for that matter
Dimetrodon is coming base game
Japanese wolf, Maybe? But all those are sub species
really
Never going to happen
idk since i can think of 3 true dogs that are well known this or the american what was it called black wolf might not be to strange
you from poland?
netherlands, theres only 3 bison there haha. but its a very controversial nature reserve as its fenced off and has 0 natural predators so they breed to much and starve during winter
how did you unblur it?
and people in my country would rather go out their way to kill a wolf than release one anywhere
Now seeing it, this is really PZ animal pack type DLC
also does this mean that quagga and wild horse are alts?
Yes
It’s not unblurred, someone judt wrote over it
I mean, the text matches in exact length for everything
It’s not if you live in America
This parrot one of the most popular RE animals honestly
I’m meh on the parakeet tbh
Also it’s very pretty, and most Northern parrot species
Honestly, way better than pigeon to me
Not mad but not huge to me
I love them both
nah, passenger pigeon is one of the most famous recently extinct animals
like the whole "there used to be so many"
I think they shoulda chosen either pigeon or parakeet and used the other slot for more island fauna
its probably one of the saddest if not single saddest case of extinction
sylviornis could've been cool
once unrivaled on its continent and now just gone
especially as it could've been potentially the closest relative of gastornis or something like that
lowk a swarm of rocky mountain locust would be kinda cool as a viv
I’m cool with the list as-is, but there’s some I hope still come later
Elephant bird being the biggest
i hope they go from 9 species to 10 and add indian aurochs
i feel elephant bird has another purpose in their minds already
Indian aurochs would be an alt, so it may come
like its the biggest bird not adding it in RE almost confirms the idea of a madagascar dlc
bit old for re, no?
I feel like future dlcs could work as like, 6 new genera, 2 new vivariums, and 2 alt species for either new or returning genera
yeah and it seems fair
Though I think it also depends if it’s a dlc pack or a full on expansion
the devs seem to like to hide things so i wouldnt be suprised if they just hid an alt
to reveal later
is ~800 bc too old?
I’d expect expansions to have more like 8-10 genera
No, not really
like aquatic?
Yeah
for a animal pack its good but a giant update isnt needed ig
maybe a new biome i suppose
seems to be like 9 animals?
I’d say it depends on what else is being added
i think 9 is what they tell us now but we will also get an aurochs alt
Flying and swimming are the most obvious expansions
i would love an alt dlc
I doubt well ever get a new biome besides maybe a “marine” biome
I expect aurochs to be more like mammoth
So no alt per say, but each skin is different subspecies
i am wondering why there was no columbian mammoth alt for the wooly mammoth
But you could have others that add more mechanics and such
or even a steppe mammoth alt
doesnt make sense with biomes
with the mammoth it does but aurochs not really
we have 3 subspecies european indian and north african
Wouldnt each skin simply have temperate, grasslands and maybe shrubland anyway?
indian cows famously do not handle cold well
For example a climate themed expansion with a temperature system and species that are adapted for extreme climates
and european ones dont like heat
i feel like its to much effort if you can just slightly edit things and call it a different spp
Huh?
adding different biomes for skins rather than just making it an alt spp
it seems like more effort not less
I didn’t say anything about that?
this would be a great excuse for a bunch of neat reptiles
Are you replying to the right comment?
Alt slop isn't a term I thought I'd ever hear
sorry i meant this one haha
spp means subspecies
Misread it lmao
no the chat went a little fast
Interesting there is no moa alt, but I guess it probably doesnt make sense when you look closely at every one of them
are there known colours or anything?
i do feel thats what works so nicely with alts in this pack that with the horses for example we roughly know the colours so the alts feel more like a seperate species in planet zoo than an alt normally does
Not sure about colour, but in upland moa case i think we know about feathered legs
i mean if we can have one with this and the giant one without ig an alt is reasonable
But again maybe these are not so similar when you examine them closely
Maybe body proportions, posture, movement is really different
After all there are 3 families
sometimes i genuinely want to ask the devs a few questions about this kind of stuff
like how much do you guys re use models or what is the smallest possible viv size
recently extinct species that i would like to see come to the game (assumes fliers/aquatics)
Terrestrial/semi-aquatic
Aepyornis (elephant bird)
Hanyusuchus (chinese gharial)
Pezophaps (rodrigues solitaire)
Cylindraspis (rodrigues/mauritus giant tortoise)
Aquatic
Lipotes (baiji)
Psephurus (chinese paddlefish)
Hydrodamalis (stellars sea cow)
Flying
Hieraaetus (haasts eagle)
Vivarium
Phelsuma (rodrigues giant day gecko)
Leiolopisma (mauritian giant skink)
Camptorhynchus (labrador duck)
Campephilus principalis (ivory billed woodpecker)
feel free to add onto the list
im also curious
huh why not t, frangens for skink
I was thinking
Warm: Paleocene fauna, cenomanian fauna, Triassic fauna
Cold: Pleistocene fauna
not re
yeah i just checked but its a little to old
still pretty recent all things considered
would fit better in an ice age australia pack
or just a reptile viv dlc like i suggested before
A really unlikely expansion idea would be an arboreal expansion with modular climbing pieces like in PZ
australia would be amazing though
but it could be worth it although there wouldnt be many worthwile species after the initial expansion
would be quite mammal focused though
this for example
Yeah Diplobune would rule
its to big for a viv
Also Thylacoleo
D. minor would work
i dont think its arboreal is it
Prolly like tasmanian devil
ah but by then a black bear is arboreal to
It can climb, maybe a bit better at it
yeah but it wouldnt have to be in a climber dlc
not as much as certain primates or diplobune
But it’d be better if it was
It doesn’t need to be something that’s entirely arboreal just something that’d make good use of a climbing system
i wonder how the devs will handle marsupial reproduction
marsupial reproduction is not really that different, is just got extra steps
eventually the baby is big enough to be around outside the pouch
ig if they dont animate babies in pouches we would just get adolescents with longer gestation before this
im morso wondering if there will be a point where the baby can go between pouch and wandering freely
maybe a mod is the closest ill get to asking this do you have any clue what the minumum size to viv animals is lets use gigatitan at 25cm and 40cm wingspan as example
So like, for a climber expansion you could have
Diplobune
Deinonychus
Thylacoleo
Megaladapis
Giant Fossa
Gigantopithecus
What else?
Dinopithecus
and yes they are very different from monkey lemurs and megaladapis
i forgot the scientific name but giant gelada alternate genus?
Theropithecus are the gelada
Acratocnus
ah yeah but it wasnt in your list
Megalocnus would also be good
but i think it can be an alternate genus to dinopithecus
Yeah I was just saying what the genus was since you asked
the crocodile mimic (aka spino without sail)
Not sure that can climb
i wish we had larger climbing synapsids all i can think of is suminia
would not call it spino without a sail
I think Suminia is good enough
Varanopids if they are synapsids
for viv its perfect
but I would like Suchomimus eventually
They’re a bit bigger than Suminia but not by much
but if we are talking a full on climbing mechanic dlc suminia could be a viv extra for being a very unique animal
ig this would cost more like 20-30 euros than 10-15 which i expect for an animal pack
so a few viv animals that fit the theme seem reasonable although keeping it at 2 seems smart if we include a lot of new rigs
how about suminia and drepanosaurus as viv animals for a large climbing dlc
*Ice Age squirrel
isn't that the extant variegated squirrel?
Yes, but the joke is they didnt even name it
Well, they named it Ice Age squirrel
Scrat(accurate)
Well, at least the Recently Extinct Pack will even out the Cenozoic a bit, and give us some real birds
Cant wait to see moa and pigeon between Dilophosaurus and Gallimimus in the theropod tab
also a marsupial
An Australia pack more broadly would be nice imo. Would probably be like 80% Pleistocene but a good place to put a few others
that would have like the "big 5" (diprotodon, procoptodon, thylacoleo, varanus priscus ["megalania"], genyornis), palorchestes, wonambi (would that be vivarium like titanoboa?), meiolania, quinkana
I’d personally like Dromornis
assuming that dlc would have like 9-10 animals
Is Discokeryx worth to be added to Prehistoric Kingdom??
and maybe the 10th animal would be dynatoaetus
that would make a good pleistocene australia pack, i would argue
the "big 5"+5 other notable animals
Eh, I don’t see the need. Base game already has Mutta and Leaelly, so it’d just be scraps then. I think the 6 exhibit spots are needed for Pleistocene to do it right.
Thylacoleo
Diprotodon
Procoptodon
Genyornis
Meiolania
Megalania
Do we deserve to have bunch of Prehistoric Camels in Prehistoric Kingdom???
Poebrotherium, Stenomylus, Camelops, Aepycamelus, Titanotylopus?
what about paracamelus?
but definitely camelops
Titanotylopus + Camelops is my top vote for Camelid
YES YES YES YES
especially have that in a polar setting
Smaller sized camels like Stenomylus and Poebrotherium would be Neat for Agate Springs and White River Rep
I meant from the Cenozoic in general. If it was 8, I’d say
Procoptodon goliah
Thylacoleo carnifex
Diprotodon optatum
Meiolania brevicollis/platyceps
Dromornis stirtoni/australis/Genyornis newtoni
Varanus priscus
Microleo attenboroughi
Mekosuchus whitehunterensis
I really want Miocene camels
Aepycamelus is sick
I’d prefer Genyornis because Late Pleistocene so it’ll be found with the rest
Our only chance at getting digsite bonuses on a mixed mammal-bird exhibit
That’s why I put it as an alt but if I had to choose one Dromornis is way cooler and more iconic
Do U Dudes think that Megacerops, Glyptodon, Prolibytherium, Embolotherium would be Peak in game
Maybe separate
It doesn’t fit the rest really
It does if you include the vivarium stuff
I get you
I just think Dromornis’s unique appearance and huge size make it more appealing
If they were cool, they’d release Dromornis as the free base species alongside the DLC
Oh that’s a fun idea
But judging by the RE Pack, that doesn’t seem to be something they’re doing
Unless it’s like… the bluebuck
they're releasing 1 free species with 9 dlc?
What?
I guess free DLC species are gonna be like in PZ, where it is something relatively simple like ornithomimus
No new rig or animations required
Shit, was that the theme of the post-EA list?
Yup
You might be right…
I guess if the roadmap is correct, PK will cover nearly every rig needed
Outside therizinosaurus of course, but that one is probably nothronychus coded
God we need Therizinosaurus
No really
No, really
or
Not really
Not really
Therizinosaurus, Daeodon, Amphicyon, Chalicotherium
Chalicotherium from Megatherium?
Ehhhh
Sure but it’s proportions are super distinct
Daeodon… idk
The more unique species were obviously from old EA list, not sure how to count them tbh
So it’d need to be adjusted a lot
Like daeodon
Chalicotherium
Daeodon can just use the ungulate rig, no?
For a big headed bitey thing?
Even with the same rig it’d need a lot of new animations
Well, duh
Amphicyon I think would use either bear or hyeanodon rig
But it has hooves so movement is similar
So like I said, not really a “no new rigs or animations” list
Ah
I think it’s just “these feel like the basic stuff to add”
Most of them aren’t completely different but they aren’t just easy additions either
Obviously there is also thing devs would like to put most popular animals in DLCs to boost sales
Wonder where it goes
Free animal alongside RE pack
Maybe bison, cause cow rig will be in making anyway
they notorously basically only nested on small isolated islands with very gentle sloped beaches
the reason cliffs are often associated is because the last island they inhabited, Eldey, was relatively unfavourable habitat but they remaining 50 or so pairs had to "evacuate" so to speak from a different island nearby that was very isolated as it was surrounded by cliffs; but it got completely destroyed in a volcanic eruption
I do wonder what they will do for the thylacine, though
I hope with the aurochs they do skins with slight differences like horn shape and a hump so they can do the 3 subspecies even if they arent designated as such
since we know it's coloration very very conclusively
and its pretty much all within individual variation of a skin
so alts would be very much nessecary
HOWEVER
notice how they specified thylacinus, not nessecarily thylacinus cynocephalus
same thing with dinornis actually
actually
not a single one of them specified species, actually, with the exception of the horses
so I would imagine that solving the skin problem with alts is probably in the cards
also I must say, I think i got surprisingly close
#1360542295228944414 message
Just for reffence, heres what I had that I got right
- format of 6 habitat 2 vivarium
- sign scenery pieces
- raphus
- thylacinus
- dinornis
- equus (with the alts)
- bos
- passenger pigeon
heres the major things I got incorrect
- dusicyon
- lack of carolina parakeet (I did technically mention it as an option but not as my main proposal)
- great auk as vivarium instead of habitat
- no scenery pieces other than signs
I think generally speaking though I just made fairly logical assumptions based on the previous pack as well as new knowledge that we learned, so I dont think anything here was particularly outrageous
I think overall though I got pretty close
thoughts?
oh, also, just for funzies, here are some possible dig sites for the critters
could there be 2 alts for the moa?
Tuarangi Cave: Dinornis robustus
Mare aux Songes Swamp: Raphus culculattus
Thylacine Hole / Nullabor Plain: Thylacinus cynocephalus (could also house other australian critters like Thylacoleo in the future)
Funk Island: Pinguinis impennis
Cahokia Mounds: Ectopistes migratorius, Conuropsis carolinensis
Maasvlakte: Bos primigenius, Equus ferus
Nelson Bay Cave: Equus quagga quagga
La Brea Tar Pits: additional site for Equus ferus, additional site for Ectopistes migratorius
Tokod Formation: additional site for Equus ferus
probably not
the genus specified is dinornis, and iirc its just two species
I would definitely like that tho
I think all of these are pretty solid except Maasvlakte, I honestly just picked it because it had wild horses and Aurochs
also, if its in bold, its new
if its not, new formation just new content
also fuck I forgot quagga
hold on
honestly the quagga being essentially a different color morph of the burchell's zebra isnt doing it any favours
especially in the fossil record
also this is bear minimum assuming we dont get any alts which honestly I dont think is likely
id say bare minimum probably at least one additional species alt within the genus
different genera as alts I dont think is particularly likely
i meant that it would be like 1 alt
so maybe there would be 10 species, but it would be moa (2 species), thylacine, dodo, quagga (and tarpan as alt), great auk, passenger pigeon, carolina parakeet, auroch
Alts within genera i meant
also the format of counting alts as seperate "slots" so to speak doesnt seem very intuitive
considering that the horses are listed as a single unit
@vital grove finished t. frangens
Penguinis alfrednewtonensis
Penguinis impennis
Thylacinus potens
Thylacinus cynocephalus
Dinornis robustus
Dinornis novaezealandiae
Equus quagga quagga
Equus ferus
Raphus culcalattus
Bos primigenius primigenius*
Bos primigenius namadicus*
Bos primigenius mauritanicus*
Ectopistes migratorius
Conuropsis carolinensis
in the case of Aurochs, they could easily just drop the subspecies denomination and instead just make skins that would take traits from the given subspecies
for example, an aurochs skin with a hump and upward twisting horns resembling the indian aurochs, or another with curved horns similar to the african aurochs
the size looks great but it would likely have osteoderms on its sides and i thought this would be the one without stripes
🔥
So add more osteoderms and evicerate the stripes?
yeah you can use blotches like the other subspecies but at this point to many have stripes and frangens is a good candidate for cryptic patterns and more green
especially since it lived in a more foresty enviroment
Describe “cryptic patterns”
K
Ooooh that looks really cool
snek
yeah and it fits perfect with where t frangens is from
I’ll fix it rn
colour it green and certain osteoderms have different shades of green and it fits a forest enviroment perfectly
yeah its a bit annoying in that regard lol
yeah please base it of the mengsheng thoughsince harpalo will probably have stripes to
Passengers didn't live in California
they did in the pleistocene iirc
They were never found west of the Rockies
historically they were in the eastern half of north america, yes
Do you have a source?
Cause nothing I have ever looked at has indicated such
Oh huh just found it
I guess they were in La Brea
Doesn't seem like they were nearly as numerous in the west though
definitely not
but if they were there may as well add them to the digsite
other than that, sound good?
I think unless they add subspecies designations in the DLC since quagga would probably use them, this would be how its done
only thing would be a quagga one
ye
or alts
Well I mean the ssp as alts
since technically 3 out of the 6 habitat animals could hypothetically have alts and 1 additonal one could have subspecies alts
within their genus, since genera are just mentioned
here was a possible guess I made
mostly since they solve the "skin problem" so to speak, especially with the great auk and thylacine
Yes I am aware
oki
in that case, I would just add the irl formations where those guys were found
since the auk and thylacine are actual fossils rather than more recent bones
My point is that the animal names may have a subspecies "spot" within the bi(tri?)nomial that already exists within the nursery/paleopedia menu
Because you would need one for quagga regardless
ohhhh i see
ok
So I think its entirely possible that the aurochs ssp would get the alt designation in the same way
But who knows
perhaps
really could go either way honestly
quagga only needs the distinction per se since the species is still extant
whereas aurochs doesnt have this problem
they could also totally get away with just doing the eurasian aurochs
and having different skin varieties
their known color patterns were relatively diverse
still think the 3 localities is the better option, though
I'd be surprised if they did tbh
Seems like a major missed opportunity if they didn't go for all 3
so they could add a digsite there if they wanted to
but not nessecary
Almost like its eurASIAN
true
I'd be shocked if they even gave it a new digsite tbh
prolly not
oh also I just realized
if you think about it
technically
they could
put quagga in the karoo formation
Lol
I assume they'll just put it in some south african pleistocene formation
and there are quite literally 0 subfossil remains from quagga
probably
No reason to believe they wouldn't just be there
well
yeah
also if anything the quagga might have had a larger range in the pleistocene
since iirc the main reason it developed in the first place was because it was relatively cool enough so that biting flies were less of an issue
during the pleistocene, this would have applied even greater
Not impossible
ok
may have found a good candidate
ill add it
relatively not glupshitto and had Equus quagga remains there
which is probably just quagga period given the locality at the very southern tip of south africa
there are even a few extinct species there like perlorovis albeit sp
and megalotragus
Nelson Bay Cave, previously known as Wagenaar's Cave, is a coastal archaeological site in the Robberg Nature Reserve on the Robberg Peninsula in Plettenberg Bay, South Africa, about 250 km east of Cape Town. The cave is 18 meters (59 ft) wide and 35 meters (115 ft) deep, and the cave opening is 21 meters (68 ft) above mean sea level. The cave wa...
Perlorovis is a junior synonym Bos and not from the Late Pleistocene, Syncerus antiquus is probably what they have
(Which would be awesome)
i was a bit confused by that also
There’s probably bluebuck there… if there’s an African DLC or something
They mention having both
At least on the wiki link that was shared
I think Pelorovis is still a valid genus but the most popular species is now classified under Syncerus
It seems like the validity of lumping Pelorovis is, like many things, complex and contentious
My ideal cenozoic Australia lineup
Exhibit
Varanus priscus
Dromornis australis/stirtoni/Genyornis newtoni
Diprotodon goliah
Procoptodon optatum
Thylocoleo carnifex
Meiolania brevicollis/platyceps/.sp (Wyandotte species)
Mekosuchus inexpectatus/whitehunterensis
Vivarium
Tiliqua frangens
mesozoic is pretty much done unless we get aquatics ngl
Mekosuchus would work SO MUCH BETTER as a vivie
how?
give me a reason why it SHOULDN’T
Well they're like a meter long
if auk and dodo are free roam meko can be as well
I mean is that not comparable to simosuchus?
so we can have multiple species?
Correct
realistically mekosuchus would probably be a vivarium
That's the second problem
nobody here agrees with you
it is also signifigantly less active than those two
you are objectively wrong here
Way too different
I wouldnt complain if it was free roam, its just not realistic
thank you
I mean
thats what you get when you lump an oligocene crocodile and holocene one that happen to be vaguely the same size
now is there anything you want to say PrinceVermillion
any apologies you might owe someone
Take it down a notch dude
yeah thats not nessecary
Frankly just cause people agree with you doesn't mean the opposing person owes you shit lol
Pretty much yeah
Yeah, but I think it’s wrong and probably based on when S. antiquus was Pelorovis
I don't really understand how these can be the same genus and no one has really "fixed" it yet
now Trilophosuchus would be another very nice vivie
though idk if it’s too similar to Meko
Several have questioned but none have done anything with it
theres a lot of those
Sure
also you have to prove it
And I ask the same question
I mean I can look at it and tell its wrong
idk how scientific papers work but id imagine they are probably far from simple
Its not exactly hard to prove
Considering the papers are from 1976 and 1980…
at least in this case its not a varanus situation where it would be a revisionists nightmare
varanus is probably not even that hard to fix
just elevated the
shudders
subgenera
to genera
Varanus doesn't need fixing
I still remember when Varanus priscus was called Megalania
and then just upgrade varanus the genus to a tribe or subfamily Varanini or somenthing
They're all still very closely related
Some within are closer to each other, which is what the subgenus distinction is for
Same deal for Bison within Bos
You remember 2004?
idk I was 2 at the time
well bison within bos is paraphyletic whereas iirc none of the varanus subgenera are, but similar scenario
Its not
would it not be?
You're just demoting bison to subgenera
thanks, I already feel like I’m about to turn into dust
yak is closer to the bison than to the other bos
All the bison sp group together
all the varanus subgenre are monophyletic
Wdym
thought so yeah
so either yak needs its own subgenus or needs to be inside of bison
Oh I see what you mean. What he’s trying to say Bos would be paraphyletic if Bison was a separate genus
Bos (genus)
Bison (subgenus)
Bison/Bonasus (species)
yes
youd need a minimum of 4 total subgenera
Bison themselves aren’t paraphyletic though
to make bison a subgenus
some "species" need sorting out though, especially in odatria and euprepiosaurus
What
*Three, at least for extant species
cows / aurochs, yak, bison, and the 3 asian bovines
unless u put yak inside bison in which case you can do it in 3
Yak could go within bison if you want
You don't need multiple subgenera to make one valid
ok but it also makes very little logical sense
It really doesn't
What’s even the argument anymore
idk man
Idek
lost in the plot
perhaps we should discuss more important matters
anyways
#900435785084452924
Lazarussuchus for vivarium species am I right boys
We all agree Bison is a subgenus and not separate from Bos? Then we’re good
mayhaps
perchance
potentially
i surmise it could occur
are there any better choristoderes
champsosaurus
I really don't see us getting more than one choristodere
And if we get one its gonna be champso
homunculoid
Ahem
Homunculus (Latin: [hɔˈmʊŋkʊlʊs]; "little person") is an extinct genus of New World monkey that lived in Patagonia during the Miocene. Two species are known: Homunculus patagonicus and Homunculus vizcainoi, which are known from material found in the Santa Cruz Formation in the far south of Argentina. Reaching a latitude of ~55°S at the ti...
not a homunculus, its a homunculoid
two headed beastie
iirc the only known fossilized case of polycephaly
I don't believe its the only one but its definitely the most notable
as far as I can find, it is
unless something has been discovered since 2007 which is a possibility
I could have sworn there was at least one other
ik that polycephaly occurs much more frequently in reptiles and amphibians compared to birds and mammals, and it is listed as the only known fossil reptile of this occuring
ill check
ok yeah as far as I can see it is the only mentioned case
which isnt surprising considering how uncommon it is for this to occur, adding onto the incredibly rare chance of animals fossilizing in the first place
hell, hyphalosaurus is one of the most common tetrapods in the yixian formation
thousands of well preserved specimens
Just realized that has a medieval painting artstyle
like cheap enough there appear to be multiple on sale online for only 2-3k
and eggshell fragments for less than 20$
just to give you an idea of how relatively common it is
so our best chance is either Champso or Hyphalo
Ignore the fact that it's illegal to sell Chinese fossils
Not really a point in hyphalo imo
Champso as an exhibit animal kinda just covers it
The only reason people know Hyphalo is the polycephaly
There's like 5 other better minis from Yixian
fair point
And champso is from HC so more opportunities to cohab/theme etc
if vivarium species had alts (even though they don't), what do you think would be ones?
for existing vivarium, i would say:
-sinosauropteryx for compsognathus
-shuvuuia (at least) for mononykus
-maybe changyuraptor (or a yixian microraptorine) for microraptor
at the very least, like, water toggles (fresh vs salt) for water placement and vivariums
like, sure, it doesn't require fully aquatic species to be added, but marine water mechanics and such would be, and the devs definitely aren't planning that until post full launch (and that's fine of course)
I disagree, it's an iconic part of the Yixian fauna
Some amphibious viv critters
Beelzebufo
Vancleavea
Castorocauda
Crassigyrinus
Hibbertopterus
Eusthenopteron
Cartorhynchus
Hyphalosaurus
Hovasaurus
vancleavea and hibbert both can work as exhibit species if we get aquatics
I see
Tbh I think vivs fits better
hyphalo also i suppose
i dont like using vivs unless the animal wouldnt work outside of them
For example titanoboa are quite large but it ended up in vivs
snakes are an animation nightmare in dynamic terrain
That's true
Size is not the only factor that decides on a vivarium. Arthropleura would be big enough for exhibit but if we ever get it in game it will 100% be a viv species.
locomotion, size and animation are the big three for viv species
and reproduction
Indeed
I see
things with tadpoles wouldnt really work outside vivs since ontogeny would be impossible
for example
think that would depend on how long they're in the tadpole stage
babies in game aren't newborns, they're already like 2-3 years old
Imagine koolasuchus ontogeny
Prionosuchus and Koolasuchus are my two big amphibean exhibit wants
the same goes for eurypterids lucky for us
add masto and eryops and that would be everything we need methinks
Why?
Oh yeah eryops is a good shout for a smaller exhibit amph
Why can’t tadpoles just be in exhibit water?
Metoposaurus?
i dont think the ontegeny system could facilitate such a drastic change
Well there’s no frog big enough
I don't know too much about it but just a look and he looks cool
and they acknowledged that one wouldn't be an issue, so like
read what i said lol
discussion of koola came afterwards, and tadpole was only an example, things that go through drastic morphological shifts over their growth cycle was moreso what i was reffering to
community species suggestions users and reading a full converation challenge: impossible
.
*bro pointed up reacted the message that was in relation to them 😭 *
Honestly, I respect the gumption of that
im crine vro
Hibberto outisde vivarium?
That thing barely could crawl on land
But cant really disagree with vancleava
once (or if) we get full aquatic species and implementation they could be referring to that
With great auk even smaller specimen is now somehow viable
thats why i said
.
Vancleavea got big enough for an enclosure. The largest known specimens were in upwards of 3.8m/12ft long
YYES DRYTPO MY GOAT
auk <33333
love auk
Oh I see
✨ reiteration
thats a mengsheng @rigid spindle
hibbert for viv I would say
vancleava could be habitat tho
legs would need complex animations
also it was barely terrestrial anyways as stated above
and, not to mention, probably crawled on the bottom
Ok a Victorian Scenary pieces or better yet an entire building theme would f*cking slap, hoping it's the correct translation
i feel like we should have gotten giraffatitan as a brachi alt
it would make sense as its appearance is what the popular portrayals of brachi are based on
and we could have a poll for which skin to replace with it
In some way you could agrue archae and micro were alts of eachother
I’d prefer Vancleavea for a future aquatic dlc tbh
We wouldn’t need to replace any of them, plenty of the other A listers have 4 skins
wait yeah
Different proportions would make it difficult or even impossible tbh
Giraffititan has longer front legs and holds itself higher accordingly
Interesting
I mean I really want Kentrosaurus, so an excuse to get Giraffititan as a full species would be nice
Made a fan-DLC for fun, again. But pretty this time.
love this, pelicanimimus is one of my favourites
I considered it, but we lack a Nodosaur so I was biased lol
I also considered Paleoloxodon antiiqus and Homotherium, both of which are known from Spain and Portugal, but since they are better known from other localities I decided against it
I’m one of the guys that thinks Myotragus would work as a vivie
If the ectotherm idea had stuck I’d agree
Eusthenopteron was probably 100% aquatic though, I would wait for full aquatics before asking for it
Habrosaurus would be a good amphibious viv pick as well
We shall see Mamenchisaurus in Prehistoric Kingdom
we might
Arboreal viv creatures
Falcatakely
Confuciusornis
Anuroganthus
Suminia
Plesiadapis
Darwinius
Drepanosaurus
Longisquama
Volaticotherium
Suminia looks so freaky I’m not gonna lie
I love it
It is freaky
anyways another good vivie Arboreal would be either Mazothairos and Meganeura
What about this depiction of suminia
Meganeura would be peak
Iirc it wouldn’t have been furry
any Carboniferous bugs
I’d say Tullimonstrum would be a good amphibious vivarium but again
probably fully aquatic
Burgessomedusa
Tbh I don't know much about prehistoric bugs
I only know a few of them
Making that little PK graphic was fun, if simple as heck. Someone give me a theme/area to work with and I'll make another fan-DLC card
Madagascar dlc?
Aye aye cap'n
- Pulmonoscorpius
- Apthoroblattina
- Arthropleura
- Megarachne
#1360542295228944414 message
Prehistoric bugs that I know
Arthropleura
Meganeura
Gigatitan
Pulmonoscorpius
Makarkinia
Carcinonepa libererrantes
( a newly discovered bug)
Jaekolopterus
Eurypterus
Hibbertopterus
how big was Makarkinia
100-120mm
probably too small
Straight from google
Frr but we can make walk through exhibits
Like the planet zoo ones
Terrestrial viv picks
Sinosauropteryx
Caudipteryx
Tetraceratops
Najash
Deinogalerix
Heterodontosaurus
Thrinaxodon
Euparkeria
Aquilops
Diacodixis
Sinosauropteryx my beloved
Meh, Conca and Pelecani are great but there is no need to give even more relevance to spinosaur bits
idgaf if Sino is basically fuzzy Compsognathus I still wanna see it at some point
For real
It's Dino version of red panda
truth nuke
It's around the same level of furry gorgonopsids clade-wise
Smaller Gorgonopsids like Lycaenops would be pretty good for vivs
So none probably
I didn't include any spinosaurids?
Oh my god cat read
Iberosuchus is a terrestrial crocodile lmao
There are enough interesting spinosaurids that are famous that we don't need to suggest a whowhataspinus for the game, lol
Ask and ye shall receive
Is this format based on anything? Like the mini being a free addition?
Or just vibes for what a fun dlc would be
Vibes for what a fun DLC would be, and going off of the update style of games like Planet Zoo, where DLCs are often joined by a free content update that somehow links to the paid content, thus encouraging purchase of the DLC.
If you're referring to the image formation, I'm quite literally throwing stuff together in Adobe and going with what sounds/looks good design wise lol
Majungasaurus my goat
I suppose, if PK is going to get less amount animals than RE pack there would be some building theme instead
Just like in PZ
I see
A Victorian zoo style building theme would be fun for that pack
I would replace repetosaurus to Archaeoindris
For the rest, its a pretty good dlc idea