#Community Species Suggestions
1 messages · Page 98 of 1
Oh nice it relative to to day amphibians
Jurassic amphibians in general are super interesting tho so I think they’re ought to be more of them
Currently we have. 0 so can only really go up
I remembered knowing about Morrison one
Plesiosaur aquarium [so cool]
beelzebufo for the vivariums in case no one has asked yet 
Pretty much every animal known to science has been requested in this channel
But beelze would be awesome to see someday
not really
pmuch dinosaurs and mammals
everything outside of that
calymene is one of the most common species of trilobite and its only been brought up 6 times
I think because Trilobites typically get suggested as a whole rather then picking out a specific species.
Ammonites
I think to do marathon to name every famille of both
i think the only ones people would know are like diplomoceras
because prehistoric planet and weird shapes
I know a few but thats because they are hyperspecific to them surviving the KPG
briefly
hoploscaphites, baculutes, scaphites
I also know titanites and parapuzoia as the big guys
I woke up in a cold sweat last night
Since nannotyrannus is a valid genus
I would like to see it
Personally think it'd be a great DLC animal.
like that DLC would definitely sell
I'd buy it for sure.
put it in a pack/update with troodon
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
daddy?
if we got aquariums i feel like we would need at least a few just small random fish and one of the perfect candidates for that is my goat furcacauda
and oncorhynchus rastrosus
oh hes ugly
Not exactly small, but ok
ok well
yeah
i didnt really thing of that cuz i thought of rastrosus after
If we get a freshwater version of aquariums, that would probably be one of my top picks
and rhizodus ofc
Maybe prionosuchus too
Depending on if those little stick legs could hold it's body up
Eretmorhipis appreciation post
babi
Onchopristis
I think that for aquatics is better to free roam in painted water, but restricted at certain depth variying from species to species
Globidens would be cool but I don’t find platecarpus to be a very captivating addition
I think Globidens is a little overrated ngl
It’s cool, but once it stops trying to eat it’s just another medium sized mosasaur, so I find it very interchangeable with the plioplatecarpines
I feel if aquatics do get added some Thalattosuchians would be interesting
Dakosaurus please
More crocodylomorphs in general like machimosaurus
dang, i keep forgetting they're tiny. i keep thinking they're like big iguana or mediam croc sized
I mean they are basically triassic platipi . I just think they'd give triassic rep, be a good choice for fully aquatic exhibits as well as being cutie patooties
Are you sure these guys aren't different individuals of the same species with different ages?
What bird is this?
I'm fairly certain all 4 of these are from different formations spanning several millions of years and hundreds of miles
So I'd really really doubt it
Hypsilophodon and Nanosaurus when?
Well I believe juvenile Herrerasaur fossils are known
And they don't look like the smaller Herrerasaurids
I think teraterpeton would be cool as a terrarium creature! I learned about them today. Their faces are like :>
You should avoid using prehistoric wildlife for size comparisons
they're often inaccurate
Oh I didn’t know that
Welsh?
If youre asking about where its from, its from Nova scotia
Brythonic enough
Looks welsh somehow tbf
Why did they make it look like that lol
It’s a trilophosaur why would it have a short tail
Apparently the caudal verts being small indicates such?
If you zoom into the image it says it in the top right
Definitely would be cool
my friend wants tarchia
Ajnabia, or Tethyshadros
A small hadrosaur of some kind would be great
Somehow I also agree with this
tethyshadros isn't strictly speaking, a hadrosaur
it's a hadrosauroid
You know what I mean
a small hadrosaur would be nice, I think Telmatosaurus has great contemporaries
The recently named Kryptohadros could be an alt
Though uhhh, because of how it is a recently named species...
Eh, its not very popular right now
Then again it did come from Hateg Island
So thats something
Telmatosaurus would be a nice because quite frankly, Hateg Island isn't really all the appealing if it's just going to be Hatzego and one of the many fragmentary dwarf sauropods
yeah, telmatosaurus with kryptohadros alt could be cool
well depends on the novelty of the new species though
like haolong got more attention than yeneen, for instance
Not as popular as Spinosaurus mirabilis, thats for sure
Mirabilis be takin' up all the attention!
Can't blame them really
The scimitar spino has been a long time coming
Hatzegopteryx as the lead, and then Magyarosaurus + Telmatosaurus + Zalmoxes + Struthiosaurus enclosure
peak
me want doodoo bird
Albertosaurus would be a good add
It will come hopefully, because mau said "recently extinct " dlc is coming after launch and it will be one earlier ones
YAAAAYYY
Sorry Mau just got hunted to extinction by invasive Dodos so he sadly won't be able to make the dlc
me want mau bird
The homo mau
The author behind Dinosaur Sanctuary gave a pretty good explanation as to why adding newly described species into your work all willy-nilly is a bad idea; Simply put, they straight-up compared it to letting a complete stranger into your house.
It is also a single bone
well it's more than a theory, this was a real animal
And there isn't really anything you can do to set it apart from the tyrannosaurs already ingame.
it's a new dinosaur sure but you introduce more people to it
That's not a good idea at all.
Terrible reasoning
why? now more people would know about it
Adding an animal known from a single bone that doesn't have anything particularly interesting about it (afaik) because it's new and could introduce more people to it is very silly
Making new animals costs a lot of money
well that's your opinion ☺️ we'll see what the future holds
They even made it clear that the new Spinosaurus species is unlikely to be added either owing to this reason.
And that's even more interesting than this new guy.
Probably not whatever this unnamed bone is
Not all opinions are equal
And, at the end of the day, bigass Albertosaurines and Daspletosaurs wouldn't be farfetched
This guy is a tibia with grifter Longrich as lead author
C'mon Skiwee, throwing this kinda stuff around here is low hanging fruit and you know it
this creature isn't named and not diagnostic from my understanding
why should that be in the game
Ignore him
He's trying to joke around
He is not
"I will pretend to have a shit take while I actually do not to troll other people" is about the dumbest possible move
iq too high?
Yeah that would be go, Zalmoxes being a mess right now isn't help though
Large lad
Titanoboa, Deinosuchus and Megalania to complete the famous giant reptile trilogy
Pair it with Gorgosaurus and boom, you get two closely related animals, both of which are good species!
One down, two to go....
Megalochelys as well IMO
Archelon later?
Good shout
I still stand by Megalochelys, Stupendemys, Archelon and Meiolania quartet for big turt rep
I really want to see a pk version of it , I loved the jwe one
What about species such as Asiatyrannus or Yanbeilong?
asiatyrannus may just be a juvenile of a tarbosaurus-relative or something
yanbeilong though has the whole "it was one of the last stegosaurs" and being in the netflix dinosaurs
dravidosaurus? what's that?
It is not
Asiatyrannus, as far as we can tell, is practically fully grown
Raptorex however does represent a juvenile of a larger (non-tarbosaurus) tyrannosaur
i mean in a more recent paper it was said to be not fully grown though
it was the paper that described khankuuluu
yeah that was what i meant
pressing x
"This 2.5 meter long tyrannosaurid, upon examination, doesn't appear to be near full grown" is not really a wild take, but you do you
What are everyone’s thoughts on juravenator?
Damn, does that mean I have to take Asiatyrannus off of my park roster?
Isn’t Asiatyrannus still a sub ad?
Makes sense it wouldn’t be fully grown
Where’s the list for all the community species again?
Ask Pineapple
I think It was them that were doing the survey, otherwise gonna be a bit awkward
Would love to see the oreodonts and dawn horse
We also need more pre dinosaur stuff like gorgonopsid and dimetrodon
also non-lissamphibian temnospondyls
and a crapton of aquarium stuff
What animals do you want to see come for Prehistoric Kingdom?
Ideally, we'd get everything but we all know dev time is limited. So let's try and figure what our most wanted are. Now, there will be limits; I think the roster would benefit more from having some diversity. As such I've limited the groups as follows.
50 dinos (we have 37 confirme...
tyrannosauroid wishlist
Guanlong/Proceratosautus
Yutyrannus
Albertasaurus/Gorgosaurus
Alioramus/Qianzhousaurus
Australovenator
Megaraptor/Maip
Nanotyrannus or one of the appalachian tyrannosaurs would also be nice, but these are my top guys
TTBT, for stuff around the base of Eutyrannosauria I quite like Alectrosaurus over the Maastrichian NA dudes; s'all cool tho
And Alectro itself is quite fragmentary indeed, but still, that general faunal stage that also includes Gigantoraptor is cool
and trilobites since there on the vivarium research Icon for digsites
They're not specifically for vivariums
it's for all paleozoic digsites
I know but like a touch tank or somthing
Just like how cenozoic digsites have a mammal paw, and mesozoic have a theropod foot
I'm talking about the icon, not the animal
Just saying they have a icon so they should be in game 😉
If Deinosuchus is added in U18, I'd be happy if they reused the rig to add Sarcosuchus and Purussaurus as well.
Hyperodapedon
-# the little "lizard mole"
replace megaraptor with joaquinraptor
Vivarium or exhibit? How bugs this weirdo ?
*big
Probably varies, theres like 5 species
but vivarium
Neato
There some ones , but I think most of them are smaller than Tiktaalik
Except the one stated above I think
I hate when these sorts of images don't tell you which is which
Yeah , that's pretty annoying
Do we have any word on animals such as sarcosuchus being added?
Along with the Baryonyx. Nice
and ambulocetus apparently
Land whale hours
Ambulocetus is interesting
We definitely need some pre and post mesozoic animals
Dimetrodon is of course at the top of the list
And pre Mesozoic
Mesozoic mammals would be fun
i love ambulocetus i rlly hope we get it
I’d say keep Megaraptor or Maip
Way more recognizable and less recent than Joaquinraptor
Permian Pals
but joaquinraptor is more complete
Okey but Joaquinraptor is a silly name so It should be ignored
more complete =/= better addition, especially when talking about a still decent taxon (for a megaraptoran) which is also the namesake of the group with a much more recognisable name
Suprised no one wants this cute thing in a vivarium..
Anurognathus
or this..strange one, Monkeydactyl.
Or any of these guys, the monkey lizards.
Think these would fit viviavarium animals.
Anurognathus and Drepanosaurus are like
some of the most requested vivarium animals
its actual name is Kunpengopterus
Didnt see them in the list when i went looking for vivi
are they adding any fish into the game
tiktaalik is in game
no like are the developers planning on adding any fish to the game, i know about tiktaalik but are they planning anything else
who knows 🤷♂️
Everything in the game is fish
depends on how you define "fish"
Correct
Imo the best way to define what makes a good addition is like so
Dimorphodon,yutyrannus,nanotyrannus,dienunychus,duonychus,therizinosaurus, concavanator
always bet on Cymbospondylus
we definitely need animals that 43% easy to reconstruct, 82% unique and have about 51% name power. give or take
You're missing the forest for the trees
?
just a bad joke. It's one way of choosing animals
Though I still think Uniqueness can be divided into taxonomic, geographic and chronological diversity
drepano who was forecasted for U16 be like
wait...
WE HAD THE SIGNS!11!!!!1!!111
istg if mr mau is seeing this and laughing maniacly while petting his white cat
like some bad guy genius from a 007 movie
Blofeld
That specific character your thinking of is called Blofeld
Ease of reconstruction is exactly what makes animals like Barbaridactylus unideal suggestions whereas a fragmentary animal like Polacanthus still has good potential
Barbaridactylus belongs to a clade with extraordinary diversity in crest shape while lacking the bones of its own crest, it’s like suggesting a lambeosaurine with no preserved crest
Meanwhile we have just enough material of Polacanthus that its close relation to Gastonia can be exploited for a reconstruction
ive been saying this since october
Need these. 💯 % need these. Now. Can't wait any longer.
they would be a good add, for me tho i really want to see a Sivatherium. Not made an enclosure for one of those critters since Zoo Tycoon 2!
Giraffoids my beloved
Without a doubt. If the African Sivatherium is put in and Deinotherium bozasi gets added, would love to make a section with them.
You know outside the Terror Birds what else in the Neogene was interesting
What do you mean
entelodont
Sebecids
Pelagornis and Argentavis
The funky elephants™
Megalodon
Yeah all of that basically
And like
Terror birds (Phorusrhacids) aren't a neogene exclusive group either
They go all the way back to the eocene
also chalicotheres
and livyatan no? atleast i think it's neogene
yeah i think miocene is part of the neogene
lazarussuchus is there, though choristoderes themselves go way back to the triassic iirc
it seems to be
also there was like 1 enteledont in the neogene, daeodon
also not the most interesting but purussaurus
and some of the last desmostylians
though those would need diving
also thalassocnus
deinotherium though that's in the funky elephants
proconsul
megalochelys
There is no hard faunal cutoff between the Pliocene and Pleistocene anyway
Quaternary is fake lol
I honestly just struggled to find interesting Neogene animals
this aged really well
But there peak in diversity was in the miocene 🤷♂️
Bro who is that
Gotta get us a tapir in the game (tapirs are my fav animals). The Giant Tapir would be a dope addition
The sebecids and other crocs
In neogene:
Ajnabia; the first African Hadrosaur to be found
We have such places as la venta, sansan, riversleigh, santa cruz, ashfall fossil beds
To sum up for interesting animals
Stegotetrabelodon should be added, as it closely resembles the Mumakil/Oliphaunts in Lord of the Rings
Elephants dispersed out of Africa evolving into many diverse forms
Some ended up in New Zealand, where they were used as beasts of war, only to be taken down by horseriders, elves and the dead
In north america you have protoceratids like synthetoceras and plenty weird camles like aepycamelus
Neogene was also period in which giant hyeanodonts persisted such as megistotherium and hyainailouros
Meanwhile in eurasia amphicyon was top dog
Knuckle-walking chalicotheres are also pretty much neogene thing
huh I always found em pretty intuitive to follow
im saying pachycefalosaurus will be the fruitivor in u17 since the update add fighting and combat and the pachy is known to fight in combat with his skull
This is one of the easier ones to read
Some of them get pretty bad tho
A lot of the time these sorts of photos are completely jumbled up
it would be easier if they were numbered ig
altho gotta say the proportions on jrcs hypero are p different to the one in the dinosaurs
I think the newer ones usually are
Like within the last couple years
Also hi narwhaler
hello
Think that's too small
It wouldn’t need much animations so I think it should be fine
Platybelodon
I personally find it very memorable..
Ok at that point I probably just sucked at finding anything
However, many people are probably unfamiliar with most of the animals from the Neogene period of the Cenozoic.
Most people only know animals from the Pleistocene epoch.
Frankly I am very ignorant about the Cenozoic periods compared to Mesozoic periods
Looking it up, it's bigger than I remember at about 35 cm. It should be fine
any big awawa enjoyers here (titanohyrax would be sick)
That is unfortunate and this is one of the reasons why I commissioned many Neogene (and Paleogene) animals as PZ mods.
EOcene, Oligocene and MIocene (and to an extent Pliocene) are criminally underrepresented - I however got to know these fascinating species (or some of them) at an early age through a German Was ist Was book on extinct mammals.
Among them Titanohyrax and Kvabebihyrax
Top bear and top dog of course.
Megisto, Amphicyon, Simbakubwa,
what I also would love are giant mustelids: Ekorus ekakeran, Megalictis ferox, Plesiogulo marshalli, Eomellivora spp.
Aepycamelus was mentioned, Oxydactylus would be good,
Non-Smilodon machairodontines (I have also commissioned quite a few of them)
There's no such thing as too many
Yes
Looks cool in theory
How are you gonna apply and plot it in the practical world?
Dodo bird
I mean its pretty simple
I'm really hoping to see more Cenozoic animals because I think one of the biggest draws of PK for me was seeing animals like Paraceratherium in the game, which is something not many other zoo sims offer.
That being said, my core wishlist is something like
Dinosaurs:
Carnotaurus
Therizinosaurus
Shantungosaurus
Cenozoic:
Chalicotheres
Daeodon/Entelodonts
Terror Birds
Ambulocetus
Machrauchenia
dimetrodon would be so cool
Carnotaurus is confirmed and probably coming in update 19, ambulocetus is speculated to be in update 18
Glad to hear it!!!
was ambulocetus fully aquatic or not
I think it could definitely go on land
The oldest known obligate aquatic cetaceans are basilosaurids
more Dromaeosaurs
It’s occurred to me that with Utahraptor including we will only get 2 dromeos in 1.0
Which is fine but I’d like the deinonychus
Yes
If you include Microraptor, there are three species.
I occasionally forget that that is considered a Dromeosaur
Yeah but what if utahraptor has a secret achillobator alt that we don't know about
Won't be the first time the Devs add an extra animal into an update, look at sahonachelys
Achillobator is not worth adding, just give me 4 good utah skins with different levels of feathering
Sahonachelys was added because there were no other animals that fit in the box-shaped amphibious vivarium, so it wasn't a surprise addition.
would the dier wolf count sise technicly its no longer extinct
Dire wolves are extinct and are a reasonable suggestion for the game
the dire wolf is very much extinct
The colossal dire wolf is nothing like the real thing
What animals do you want to see come for Prehistoric Kingdom?
Ideally, we'd get everything but we all know dev time is limited. So let's try and figure what our most wanted are. Now, there will be limits; I think the roster would benefit more from having some diversity. As such I've limited the groups as follows.
50 dinos (we have 37 confirme...
btw, u missed boipeba from my suggestions
terrestrial viv
Boipeba tayasuensis, giant blind snake
I think I’m the only person who put antarctopelta as one of my most wanted creatures
Huh... I had that marked down as okay. It must not have been copied over. I'll add it back in when I update the results for end of March.
It has 5 votes in the dino category; not a lot but not nothing.
no flying and aquatics right?
I think the current game has a serious lack of geographical diversity in terms of sauropods. They're all literally from the same formation (except for Argentinosaurus). Not only that, but it would also be great if they showed more size variety in this group. Dinosaurs like Amargasaurus or Nigersaurus would bring the diversity I'm talking about (especially Amargasaurus, since it's a unique animal and would offer many possibilities for skins).
Do you guys think hypsilophodon would constitute as an exhibit or vivarium species?
Dunno how accurate this is but
No, it's a smaller animal. Third column, middle, that's hypsi, V-raptor is below that. Top second column is Mononykus
for what sections? the last two are devoted to aquatics and larger flyers
pachycephalosaurus isn't treated as confirmed is it?
No
I haven't seen any evidence proving we're getting it
Just (reasonable) assumptions
Eh still large enough for a full enclosure
not sure if guanlong or herrerasaurus
for what
for slot in the survey
not denying that
doubt between edmontonia/denversaurus and gastonia/polacanthus
Is Borealopelta close enough to Edmontonia to be an alt of it or are they too different? idk much about nodosaurs
At first glance osteoderm placement is too different for ontogeny purposes
Borealopelta is useful for understanding nodosaurs in general, but not too great in terms of sticking it within a biota
I'd rather have multiple panoplosaurs as alts, and if Borealopelta influences the skin design, awesome
Borealopelta is kind of like the Kulindadromeus of nodosaurs
Exquisitely preserved fossil that gives us some interesting information regarding their general respective clades, but the animal itself is not exactly known from a charismatic fauna
And if you want an Albian nodosaurine from North America whose name also ends in -pelta, you've got Sauropelta. It even has some creed as one of the species that the PK devs considered for the game, only Sauropelta can be added with Tenontosaurus, Deinonychus, even Sauroposeidon possibly
i've read denver instead of borealo in my head cause my message lol
Also this. Making a nodosaur have a reddish-brown skin akin to Borealopelta is just like giving something like Hypsilophodon or even Thescelosaurus the integument distribution (complete with a scaly tail) of Kulindadromeus
I’d prefer edmontonia / Denver with a boreal inspired skin
Edmontonia + Denversaurus has some grounding, especially since those two are an alt duo that fit right into the alts that the devs tend to favor
In dinosaurs, the devs seem to make it so alternate genera are two species with some degree of taxonomic intertwining. Tarbosaurus, Charonosaurus, Brontosaurus, etc. have had some lumps with their parent species, and Denversaurus was at one time interpreted as Edmontonia schlessmani
Think I'd prefer Borealopelta
Think I'd prefer Sauropelta
is it necessary to have 10 non-Dino Mesozoics? cause i'd really like to use some of those spots for dinosaurs or even cenozoics
i have only a few non dino mesozoics
do i write diffrent species in two sections or one
one section; they'd be alts
You don't have to put 10 non-dino Mesozoic if you can't think of any, but I'm not going to count dinosaurs or cenozoics if you put them in those slots
I wonder if any sort of exhibit amphibian would work
My favorite nodosaurid is Polacanthus and you could easily have Gastonia as an alternate genus for both European and North American representation
True
this would definitely be good
Could someone please reexplain what an alt is to me, I legit forgot.
a variant of the skin system, though instead being the same animal it's either a different species or a very closely related genera; something that doesn't require much tweaking from the base
An alt is another species/genus that takes the skin slot of another species because the original rig and model can be made into the alt with little work
So how the stego will be getting two species?
Like the taco species or para and juxia
S. Ungulatus and S. (I forgot)
They're both species under the genus stegosaurus that have only a few minor differences modelling-wise
ok ty very much
Np
S. stenops
Arctotherium, the Giant Short-Faced Bear, should be added
do you guys think longisquama would be better suited as terrestrial or arboreal?
arboreal
Arboreal or we riot
should there be a mirasaura alt for longisquama considering they're close relatives?
Vivarium species don't get alts.
Otherwise we would've seen Sinosauropteryx as an alt for Compsognathus.
yeah i know but i seriously think they should
Did the devs actually say this?
Yes
hi would Palaeeudyptes be an aquarium or a semi aquatic species
Aquarium prob
I can't see them doing flightless sea birds w/o diving especially at large sizes
If we're talking arboreal animals, I'd like a Miacis.
The common ancestor of dogs and cats must be adorable.
concavenator and crylophosaurus
Cryolophosaurus concavenator would be easy to represent the differences between males and females in a game.
Do we know if Inostrancevia is coming?
No indication of it
Unfortunately it seems like it won't be added until post-EA
You talk like it's not soon
Still a year away minimum
And who knows what the dev timeline after that looks like
it was in old art and we have at least 1 permian exhibit animal confirmed in EA
Unless Mau lied about that like he did with the vivs
No we dont
It was diictodon all along
Have people considered Mesopithecus for a vivarium species?
What
What do you think the fruitivor of u17 will be. I say pachycephalosaurus since the update main focus is on the combat and the pachy is known to fight
I would say ground sloth
Frugivor Utahraptor lets go gamers
Pachy wy and spinifer is the common consensus
I need me them Pachys
We all do
Are Metriacanthosaurus, Proceratosaurus, or Segisaurus worth it?
Metri's pretty fragmentary
if you want a Metriacanthosaur then Sinraptor and Yanchuanosaurus are better options
Want it so bad
No
Nobody would care about those names if random prop makers hadn’t arbitrarily chosen them to be on a one-and-done brochure prop 33 years ago
Im personally a little fond of Metriacanthosaurus but it's one of those animals I won't complain about if it doesn't show up
I wouldn't say that's true for all 3
Eh Procerato is a nice enough animal
Aren’t they all super fragmentary or something
At bare minimum, proceratosaurus gave its name to an entire group of tyrannosauroids
Ah
Guanglong is more interesting but Procerato is nice and Acceptable on it's own way
I wonder if it's possible for them to be alts.....
Guanlong was a member of PK's Big 50, so there's a high possibility he'll return.
Yes
Agreed
Deinon is #3 imo
#3 what
Well yeah but it's riding on Guanlong's coattails
Eh Procerato came before
And we didn't even know what it was
A proceratosaurid 
Tbf, other groups have dubious namesakes; Ceratops, Titanosaurus, Troodon
Its not dubious but I mean it shows that being a namesake doesn’t account for much
My list it
Carno/Utah
Dire wolves
Cave Hyenas
Carno and Utah are of equal importance to me
Procerato ain't dubious tho
Not a fantastic specimen but certainly not dubious
This was about "small" carnivorous dinosaurs only
And didn't count Utah since it's confirmed
And Carno would be medium sized
Its not dubious but I mean it shows that being a namesake doesn’t account for much
In that case Guanlong Deinonychus and Bambiraptor
That's not really what I was getting at
It was claimed no one would know or care about it
Ah
But that's just not true because it's the founding member of a group
Or Dromeosaurs
Idk I feel like Hadrosaurus is talked about some
Abelisaurus tho not really
Probably cause it's just a partial skull
Dromaeosaurus gets talked about plenty I feel
It literally shows up in Prehistoric Planet
Dromaeosaurus is actually like
not terribly unpopular. Not the most popular dromie but I see it in stuff.
^
Part of it is probably it coexisting with some neat stuff but also dromies are just kind of cool animals to begin with.
Plus it's the family namesake.
Being the type genus of a family shouldn't be a reason to add an animal imo
Dromeosaurs are generally pretty cool
Abelisaurus, Nodosaurus, Hadrosaurus, Alvarezsaurus, Caenagnathus... all of these guys are the namesakes of their families but that doesn't mean they need to be added
wait was that what was being argued?
erm er erm
Carnotaurus and Majungasarus, Edmontonia and Sauropelta, Saurolophus, we have Mononykus, Gigantoraptor and or Anzu
perfect
I forgor
Someone suggested the infamous brochure trio of JP, and I pointed out that those shouldn't be added because no one would care about them if they hadn't been in a prop made 33 years ago. It was then argued Proceratosaurus is at least interesting and gave the name to the Proceratosauridae, which... is definitely a new argument I've seen here
Also, personally, I think it's a mild disservice to PK to want the game to feature every single JP/JW-adjacent dinosaur. Let PK divorce itself from the JP park builders, please
What even is interesting about segisaurus outside that and being a less interesting compsognathus
well
the designers of the brochure made an error
way more interesting then anything actually to do with segisaurus
allosaurus was almost canon to the original jp let that sink in
Instead of allosaurus we got a eventually wasted slot in jwe2
That's part of why I find segi and metri so funny
if you look at the brochure
that is very much an Allosauroid skull and not a Coelophysoid
The JP brochure people were looking at skeletals of Allosaurus and Yangchuanosaurus when they added Segisaurus and Metriacanthosaurus into the brochure
well Paul lumped Yangchuano into Metriacantho
Yeah
having Metriacantho in stuff isn't as egregious as Segisaurus replacing Allosaurus
but if you're going to add a Metriacanthosaurid to the game
pick a different one
Yangchuanosaurus was also in the book's cover so the prop people decided to add the cover dino to their prop, probably as a cute little tribute
So technically, metri and segi proper were not interesting enough animals to even be in the brochure
Allosaurus just fits into jp far better then Segi as well
I’d always kinda assumed that reason for no names like that was just because that’s what they could get with the process at the time
They just so happened to also get some of the more popular ones as well
I think Metri actually has some merits of its own.
Not for PK but it's not like a completely worthless animal to be interested in.
Yang is the pick for PK though.
hands down
In the 90s, Brachiosaurus and Gallimimus were not very popular. Brach was chosen because Spielberg wanted a sauropod larger than the novel's Apatosaurus to make the "Welcome to Jurassic Park" scene even more of a spectacle. Gallimimus was chosen because it was faster than the novel's Hadrosaurus, for a better stampede scene
Deinonychus was in the novel because Crichton used Paul as a reference, and he called it Velociraptor because that's what Paul called it. Spielberg was made aware of the mistake but chose to keep Velociraptor because it sounded cooler
Fast forward to 2018 and Fallen Kingdom has Peloroplites as a random background corpse for no discernible reason other than "Look at how smart we are, we know dinosaurs too!"
nobody is going to pick up on that during the film though
Funny thing Hoplitosaurus appeared on the Innovation Center Holoscape, my personal theory is that it was actually Peloroplites as the two species are very similar and the scientists just didn't know what to call it.
I think that the random ass prop names are being thrown out there so the paleonerds pick up on them and get impressed they knew about them at all
Too bad the JWE community doesn't see it that way
if they decide for the next movie to randomly namedrop or have Plesiotylosaurus or something
As a JWE player who wants good DLC cycles, I do
its a random easter egg, man some people just love to complain about anything
I'm not going to go "wow thats Plesiotylosaurus!"
I'm going to question it
maybe someone saw it at a museum and thought of showing it as an easter egg
or google random stuff
obviously jwe purists would then want frontier to add Plesiotylosaurus and not something more interesting
dont think its really that deep
exactly
because all that guy is is a Mosasaurine which converged on a lot of Russelosaurine traits
thats interesting from a biology and anatomy perspective but not from a "oh wow what a justified inclusion" perspective
It's not really the easter eggs that are the problem, it's how people react to them
its cool I guess until the jwe purists realise
I mean as a certified paleonerd these "easter eggs" don't really impress me
I'd rather they just keep the species bloat down
For example Peloroplites is such a deep cut that it goes from being impressive to "Where the hell did you even pull that from"
fk had Tetratophoneus as well didn't it
Yeah I asked because there are two wolves inside of me regarding this
ye
PK is ultra influenced by Jurassic Park as an entity so it makes sense to acknowledge the series
On the other hand, you can't just throw in every Glupshittosaurus that's only known from a handful of bones
Like I do firmly believe all the animals with live appearences from the first 3 movies should be in
what is the point
PK already acknowledges the series by deliberately distancing itself from the tropes associated with it. They specify T. rex had good vision, raptors are small and feathered, dilo isn't venomous or frilled, and they even have Nigel say Spinosaurus powerscaling is something he never thought about
again its cool to know what that is but why did they add it
Ehhh
I mean, yes and no
of the 16 species in the first 3 films, 15 of them are slamdunk additions that any dino zoo thingy would have... except for Mamenchisaurus
I wasn't arguing it was interesting because it was the namesake
I was saying it was known because of it
I only realised it was Mamenchi way after watching the movie
Not an awful choice but a weird one at the same time
dlc concept: formation expansion packs
they would include fauna from a specific base-game formation, preferably one that has a lot of biodiversity but only one species in-game
a huincul one would be good for example
Works
Sinraptor as a Yang alt genus would be a great way to test how efficient ontogeny alts are
Stop a Yangchuanosaurus before it beefs up and it might look highly Sinraptor-like
I mean I don't see why that needs to be "tested"
Well, test, first example, proof-of-concept, whatever
We already have the "test" in Juxia
Not mammal-pilled enough
Nuh uh
I'm a proud member of the Cenozoic Sweep in the JWE server
Man those were some fun times
I don't
I've started an enclosure for one on my save
I have no idea what the most forgettable species for me is
Juxia is based and mammalpilled
A century after it was discovered, and all due to Guanlong
Honestly, Yangchuanosauridae and Guanlongidae would had been more apt approaches
Hell, Metriacanthosaurus being brought up was Greg Paul gregpauling in PDotW
Brachi was very popular, what the hell are you talking about.
Well it didn't have a modicum of the popularity it had now
Sinraptoridae should've been kept
Brachiosaurus got turned into a popular taxon by a certain 1993 film
Other than that, it was locally popular in Germany AFAIK
It was popular already
It was a common sight in books about dinos. Mainly because it was emphasized as the largest of them for ages.
That was Brachi's claim to fame.
Juxia is a top 5 PK taxa
Stego is my number 1 though
I will put stegos in every park I make from now on
Even cenozoic ones?
They were Cenozoic
Regular reminder of how cool Dacentrurines are, contrasting with the Stegosaurines that lived alongside them while matching their size
Yeah, cool too, but that one'd better come with more Tendaguru stuff
Plus lad deserves the glowup
3 stegosaurids are fine for base game
And Honest i don't think we need more
Maybe an Asian one or if you're feeling spici Isaberrysaura in a dlc
Miragaia and Kentrosaurus are the two stegosaurs I want so
No real complain about order, maybe Miragaia first?
Stego is already coming!
That's not a want that's a have.
damn it my comment erased stegosaurus from existence
I did it again, just like with Anphisplamotopterus...
Yum yum
I got baited into eating inextistance 🥺
Well i guess that covers the Spec Evo DLC that was coming in 2031
A huayangosaur ala Giantspinosaurus would be cool to get as part of the fauna from that time and place
Plenty of mid-late Jurassic Chinese stuff to add
I would also advocate for Giantspinosaurus
Yeah those would be fine as dlc
Yeah I wouldn't really be opposed to another stegosaur later on but for ones I really want after Stego it's Miragaia and Kentrosaurus.
I'd also maybe add Isa but yeah that's a bit iffy of an addition
Why
Bipedal
Even if that's very much not a unique or proven thing
But it's just fun
And i did say It was an iffy addition
It could in a way be a fun counter part to scelido
We have no limbs, originally restored as a neornithischian, the postcrania is not described...
Don't poke it
Scelido is not an ankylosaur, stegosaurs are closer to ankylosaurs than scelido is
Erythrosuchidae (meaning "red crocodiles") are a family of large basal Archosauriform carnivores that lived from the Early to Middle Triassic. Among the first Sauropsid apex carnivores, these reptiles essentially moved into the niches once occupied by the Gorgonopsid Therapsids during the Permian. With their massive skulls and sharp teeth, Eryth...
We need this guys
It would funny if we have inverse of coty
I recognize Dempsey's art
well metriacanthosaurus is like the type name for the metriacanthosaurs, and proceratosaurs was one of the earliest tyrannosauroids
also metriacanthosaurus was found in the oxford clay formation (which is what cruel sea was supposed to be based on, though the timing is anachronistic)
while proceratosaurus was contemporaneous with megalosaurus (i once had this funny idea regarding proceratosaurs and megalosaurus that was based on phylogenetic-based jokes and jurassic park 3 reference)
also peloroplites showed up in the netflix dinosaurs and mamenchisaurus has long been considered as one of the "classic" chinese dinosaurs
We had an earlier discussion on why being the type genus for a family really doesn't mean anything in most cases
Especially when the type genus is a fragmentary taxon
Everyone knows about Nodosaurus because where there are nodosaurids there must be a Nodosaurus, but suggestions and popular names include Edmontonia, Denversaurus, Sauropelta, Borealopelta, Gastonia, and Polacanthus among others
Yangchuanosaurus > Metriacanthosaurus
Guanlong > Proceratosaurus
agreed, though metriacanthosaurus and proceratosaurus would make good alts
liliensternus over segisaurus
it would go with plateosaurus
but that's not really a major must-have tbh
Agreed
hi will the Hystrix angressibe a vaverium ir a habitat species
habitat
would i be able to add a crocodile to the requstion species docs https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeEaCjefDpH8edx3Y-aKESFRT7rIXZPyN4dQ4YMVWwTsx1UWg/viewform?usp=heade
What animals do you want to see come for Prehistoric Kingdom?
Ideally, we'd get everything but we all know dev time is limited. So let's try and figure what our most wanted are. Now, there will be limits; I think the roster would benefit more from having some diversity. As such I've limited the groups as follows.
50 dinos (we have 37 confirme...
Not every somewhat small animal needs to go in a vivarium
yes, what croc?
Kaprosuchus and like a cenasoic croc
put kapro in the mesozoic non-dino section
the cenozoic croc just goes in the cenazoic section
Wait how didn't i know this thing existed
This shit is actually peak nature
Mmmmmm
I’d rather have maha over kapro
Kapro works as an alt moreso
That is more logical
But if I had to pick one
I'd like Kaprosuchus but it is just a skull
It’d be maha
its a very cool skull though
- its a bit less interesting now that we know it wasn’t as terrestrial as we thought
At least imo
Unfortunately for people who want mahajana
It doesnt
kapro has the name power and is also more unique
the skull is extremely unique
it makes it stand out compared to other pseudosuchians
I mean
I'd be shocked if it was somehow identical to an animal living some 30 odd million years later lol
Obviously it's still the best reference
I find Mahajanga to just look a little ugly
*deer
Funny ornithischian
Aren't they still debating about that ?
Not really
AAaaaa...
crickets
Smok (meaning "dragon" in Polish) is an extinct genus of large carnivorous archosaur. It lived during the latest Triassic period (latest Norian to early Rhaetian stage, between 208.5–205 Ma). Its remains have been found in Lisowice, southern Poland. The only species is Smok wawelski (after the Wawel Dragon, a dragon from Polish folklore) and w...
Smok's exact lineage is under debate; what it looks is very dependent on that
The same way all fossil taxa have debatable phylogenetics
I find it crazy how Smok is bipedal in both potential theories and yet The Dinosaurs made it quadrupedal
uppercase vs lowercase
no its like an actual question
because cladistically/taxonomically speaking, fish = vertebrate
because lungfish are closer to tetrapods than they are to a cod, and cod are closer to tetrapods than they are to a shark, and sharks are closer to tetrapods than they are to a lamprey
by fish I basically mean any vertebrate
erm.... akshully......
you forgot......
dungus beetlus....
............
😠
🙁
also
I think it would be cool if certain vivarium species had extra color morphs (mutations I mean)
this is why my preferred definition is members of actinopterygii
I mean
coelocanths and lungfish fit all the typical definition of fish
the way I see it fish can just be a paraphyletic clade
like tree
I mean the term fish is just inherently not useful taxonomically speaking
colloquially, but as you just saw people will say stuff like "all verterbrates are fish"
unless you specify further as to like, IE cartilaginous fish, jawless fish, jawed fish, lobed finned fish, ray finned fish
ect
Paraphyletic clade is an oxymoron, you are looking for the word "grade"
Cute isn't it?
Isn’t it just a baby?
Wait, it’s a thescelosaurid? So it loses in priority to Thescelosaurus itself
0 appeal
I mean, with all due respect, it's kinda foolish to start suggesting a species just because it was recently named.
theres better creatures that fill the same role that we know more about
ie Thescalosaurus proper
can we stop suggesting animals because they were just named
It’s a baby which means the adult would be purely speculative, it’s got zero cohabitation potential, and it’s not even the first, second, or third best thescelosaurid
what other ones would there be aside from Thescalosaurus this isn't my area
Orodromeus/Oryctodromeus
ok
Though for cohabitation perks, there's Parksosaurus.
I think the main thing here is
you can suggest whatever you want
but if you want your suggestion to be taken seriously don't just do "x new dinosaur"
Thats a made up rule done by you all who end up being annoying
Its literally a species dump channel lol
Let people suggest whatever they want
same thing with the people who say something can’t get in because it’s “too fragmentary”
I'm not saying people shouldn't
just wanting a species because its newly described is a whatever
Yeah, I have no idea why I opted to chime in considering I've ragged on that lot before.
I wonder if Parkso could be a thesc alt ngl
It's the sister genus so maybe
There are 3 definitive thesc species, though idk how different they are
Not that they can't make them different like they do for Camara, though that's not something we see often nowadays
I mean Thescelosaurus is almost exclusively end Maastrichtian as a genus and every species (if they are valid) is just part of the Lancian fauna
I’m pretty sure that we could sacrifice one of the potential species for an alt genus to add more Horseshoe Canyon rep with Parksosaurus
I mean again
Camara
I think if the skins for each species are noticabley different like Camaras then it'd work
Exactly
I like how they all fit a different biome
I don't think "they're from the same place" is a good argument against
Cause so are the trike sp
Its not a solid argument at all
Most of the morrison rep also fits there
Mhm
Allo, stego, apato/bronto
I would Barsboldia or saurolophus as an arid adapted hadrosaurs
Saurolophus and Maiasaura for me.
You know what we need ? one vivarium from morrison
I think it's really neat and really overlooked that the Two Medicine was like practically a savannah
Yeah maiassaura is great too
Mhm
I do think some new discoveries can be significant enough to warrant attention from the team
Though ideally they should still wait until a decent amount of material is published
Honestly I think it depends on the animal
Stegouros is probably the newest recent discovery that actually offers something new
ok that one definitely has a place in the game
With a Minmi alt.
Or maybe Kunbarrasaurus since that’s the animal people think of when they picture Minmi
Minmi reconstructions are usually based on Kunbarrasaurus are they not
but Minmi has more name power so its a tough one
@feral cedar ahem
I mean the animal you want is Kunbarrasaurus
Your mental image of Minmi is an animal that looks like Kunbarrasaurus
And you're gullible af for taking the bait so easily.
Because that’s what we thought Minmi was for some time
???
I said that to mess with ya.
Respectfully, don’t
But either way, we've been told to stop policing people over their species suggestions.
Even if they are fragmentary or new.
Yeah unless someone's being an abject tool, don't be a mini mod
Apologies on my part here, but tbf, I do prefer Minmi on account of name recognition.
I'm not a big fan of "I want this species because its newly described" and will struggle to take it seriously
but people can still suggest them
Now, do I give a damn if the material referred to it is now another animal? No. Especially if they turned out to be related anyways because that still makes for a point of reference.
If anything I do like that new spiked iguanadon thing we got recently
not in EA but it would be a neat future thing
Or at the very least, used as inspiration for other iguanodonts.
I still find it funny that PK's design wound up becoming more conservative after the fact.
From what I understand they may not be especially closely related
Well, they're still parankylosaurs, so even then, there's a point of reference available.
And again, the argument may well be moot when we already have similar examples ingame.
I don't know if I'm just having that much of an off-day today, but in the end, trying to make arguments over a species request in an admitted dumping ground feels frankly pointless and dumb in its own right.
That's the thing
Minmi may not be
i would also add spicomellus (though it was described before stegouros was, the additional material was only described last year [as of this writing])
also joaquiraptor (being one of the last and most complete megaraptorans), haolong (hadrosauroid with spiky integument from yixian), and maybe spinosaurus mirabilis as an alt for spinosaurus aegyptiacus
also what cohabitation potential with parksosaurus?
like with pachyrhinosaurus?
Yeah
i think it was recovered as one in the patagopelta paper this year
Even if it was that's hardly hard evidence
That wasn't a paper that was intending to plot out all of parankylosauria
I mean
I don't know about Krypto itself
But a similar animal yes
A dwarf Hadrosaurid would be so cool
How about Tethyshadros with Kryptohadros as an alt
Eotrachodon would be also nice
Tho another American species isn't really what I want for PK
Lmfaoooo
Idk why a species location really even matters
North America just has extensive fossil beds and has been well-studied for over a century
Its missing a ton of Late Pleistocene species for starters
Cause when you play PK as intented - zoo game, then you start to organise animals by their geography and having so many NA animals is just boring.
That's why I organize by time period/era.
I do both, especially if animals live with each other
Location does matter
same here
I do both if I can
even combinations if possible
so like
heres just some of the ones ive used recently in my own park
cretaceous asia
cretaceous north america
mammoth steppe
triassic
"time trek" (chronological indoor walk through time with mostly vivs, but also juxia, pssitacosaurus sp. and leallyanosaura)
cats of la brea
jurassic
dinosaurs of the UK
paleogene
Telmatosaurus and Tethyshadros for sweet Hațeg rep
feel free to use these
also if your smart with your exhibit planning, sometimes you can have an enclosure with two seperate viewing spots in two seperate areas
I did that with scelidiosaurus; its enclosure is viewable from both the jurassic side and the Dinosaurs of the UK side
Might take this into account for my all species park
Whenever I do that
ye
i also didnt do that for all species, my park is notably missing an africa section
but you can definitely make one
Helps add diversity imo
For example we don't have any Appalachian animals yet, several to chose from (tho one is the best pick)
I do hope we at least get Cryo so we can have at least 1 animal from every continent
telmatosaurus with kryptohadros alt
tethyshadros wasn't from hateg
i would rather go with antarctopelta
Seeing as theres three of these guys...
Telmatosaurids
Why not get all three of them so far?
Telmatosaurus, Tethyshadros, and the recently named Kryptohadros
All three of them are closely related to each other
like with parasaurolophus and charonosaurus?
eoconfuciusornis the feathers were preserved to
thats kind of the point
tethyshadros has the cool spiked beak and is recovered closest to kryptohadros phylogenetically
tethy also just has amazing material
Shantungosaurus would be a great edition to the game someday if the devs would like that or not?
We have Leally
how dare you be so serious.............. cryolophosaurus is antarctica...... so what if antarctica was part of australia and some other place......
antarctica is antarctica
Obsessing over continent/country rep is pointless. Animals back then would not have been cared about imaginary borders and living ones today often try to do the same despite the obstacles we throw up.
That does not count lmao
Obsession over what other people define as an area is just as pointless lol
Not a species suggestion but a color/coat patterning suggestion
Potentially color morphs for the dinosaurs that like scrub and desert 🏜
These are chuckwallas BTW.
Give me a coty with these colors and I'm selling my soul to the devs
Desmostylus
Fat fuck
These guys are such weird critters, I can't imagine how they'd animate their swimming
I forget if desmostylians could even move on land
But they'd be a cool addition cause desmo don't really get any paleo publicity
Depends on the species
Some probably could, some could not
I guess behemotops could be on land
why have shant when we have e.annectens
Genuine question
they're basically the exact same thing at the end of the day
b i g
i think shant is a good dlc seller/filler, easy to make and popular/recognisable enough for people to want it. Same with giga
not worth as a base animal tho
I think it being cheap makes it exactly base game material
Giga at least has a little potential going for it, especially if they shake up the depiction compared to carch
But what does Shant actually have that annectens doesn't
Something simple and popular at the same time given in free update alongside DLC
It's like. Annectens. But from a different region
Maybe, possibly slightly larger, but not substantially so
and I think the name value is basically only because people overhype it as hadrosaur-zilla
Granted, if we didn't have annectens already, yeah sure why not
But I think annectens does the job as is
We can apply this to a lot of animals we have in game
Having similar animals isn't that bad
Depends, I do tend to lean similar animals within a certain degree of similarity are better as DLC than basegame update.
Like Giga.
Can also apply different behaviors to Shant also, compared to Edmonto
Or some extra soft tissue flair
Shant I feel falls into the good DLC animal category.
Outside of alts, what would this apply to genuinely
At the same level as Shant and E. annectens
This is a zoo building game not something like an ecosystem sim. How we relate to and define geography is something worth considering when making a zoo and subsequently what animals to suggest for the game.
Knüppe spotted..
I will not sugarcoat it, I am very biased, i dont want shant due to all the isle glazers