#Community Species Suggestions
1 messages · Page 85 of 1
icthyo isnt even a temnospondyl
I know
the Elliot Temnospondyli
Beast of Lesotho for u18 trust
Do we really have anything from the beast of lesotho?
It's true that Mastodonsaurus and Koolasuchus may be difficult to grow in a vivarium.
and Prionosuchus
Give me a second I scaled it last week
Sclerocephalus is an extinct genus of temnospondyl amphibian from the lowermost Permian of Germany and Czech Republic with four valid species, including the type species S. haeuseri. It is one of the most completely preserved and most abundant Palaeozoic tetrapods. Sclerocephalus was once thought to be closely related to eryopoid temnospondyls, ...
Giant icthyosaur core
Holy oxalia
This one isn't Lost atleast
also from my understanding the beast of lesotho name is from a reddit post
If I had a nickel for every genus named from a single jaw/tooth fragment, I could probably afford to fund an expedition to find more of the skeleton
It’s not named
It's also a lot more unique, Oxalaia was probably just a generic large spinosaurid
We have a bit of jaw and spinal column
Large spinosaurids are oddly good at getting incinerated
I used was for a reason
i dont think you can even tentatively confirm that vert is oxalaia beyond "it looks like a spinosaurid vert"
unless its found together with the holotype or overlaps with it, which the holotype doesnt even have a vert
Honestly spinosaurid are very samey except for like 3 exceptions
There's no reason to belive Oxalaia would be anything special
Admitedly just guessing but still
and the postcrania are reconstructed off like each other too
its like using Giganoto to fill in the gaps of carch and yea....ofc theyd look similar
At least Gnatusuchus would work in large and medium vivariums.
tho vivarium wise, ig more ideas for what else can use the smallest amphibious tank would be nice
so far its only the turtle
Tbh even with carcharodontosaurids which tend to be more completely they also look pretty samey once you reach 4 tons and upwards with the exception of Acro
Would cacops fit in box?
It would fit
Beelzebufo
Drowned frog
Beelze could probably go in terrestrial if they add a water enrichment item
idk enough about beelze if it could even vibe underwater
Even without the enrichment It would probably be fine with the natural humidity
True
It's an arid toad
It probably can't even swim
Madagascar back then was fairly arid, right?
There's a reason there are no Deep cave frogs/toads
Dry Savannah (Grassless) with some woodlands and wetlands scattered in iirc
Essentially just modern Madagascar but make It 75% drier
It'd be like putting a rainfrog in a lake
A mue pool enrichment and done
ok get sthg else for the amphibious box
Fish
Cacops kingdom
Cacops would probably also drown tbh
Not too much water but i feel like the inclination is way too sharp
If It Falls into the wáter i doubt it would be able to make It back to land
Tho tbf it's a videogame
Just put a ladder or a flight of stairs in there
Cacops crane
Coccosteus?
Tho that might be better for a straight up aquarium
Wouldn't be able to use half of the box otherwise
Oh wait!
Cretapsara athanata
100myo very well preserved freshwater crab
Okey 5mm nvm 😭
I feel like those would be better reserved for a tide pool/Coastal aquarium
vivarium touch pool
Fair point
If you want an invertebrate look for an Eurypterid
Are there any small enough?
Not sure
There's that one that left the trail
That one might
But it's not a fossils per se
Megarachne might work
So i don't know if It has an actual named species behind it
I think those are of the aquatic branch?
They can't go on land?
Idk
I'm not that knowledgable on eurypterids
I thought of a single Habrosaurus but that's probably too big
What animals would actually be the ones to have constant snow in their enclosures?
Now that i think of it
Cause mammoths had the step and all
Barely any
Well darn
prolly an extinct marmot or sthg
1 or 2 Habros would probably be fine in a Large vivie
Most arctic animal are aquatic either way
I don't think there were many tundra species in the past
Mainly because there wasnt many arctic biomes back then
cave bears the moment they see snow:
On a large one yes, but rn we're trying to find something that fits on wetland box
What
Oh they
They lying in the snow
I see I get it
Habrosaurus reminds me of khuli loaches
Silly times for all
nah, theyd just automatically go hibernate lol
Cteniogenys
This might be a stretch, but I can see 2-3 habros fitting in box
Mainly cuz they would just pile up on top of eachother
Phlegethontia
1m long but still fits just based on how thin it is
Amphibamus
Would be hell to animate but oh well
the noodle
Box has a lot of noodle potential
I feel like It would drown
Would (I'm not even attempting to spell that) move much?
Why do so many things feel like they would drown
It's an amphibian, even if i imagine It would be on the more active side i doubt It would be more active than Titano
There's also the fact that:
Unless you do Ctenio sp then you have more material, but the named species is only this.
I really do not care about this
I really
do not care
Just slap the named species name on the material for sp. And don't tell anybody
maybe Tanytrachelos?
Actually great pick
Thunder thighs
tanystropheids were so fucking weird in general
He's got the capy charisma
He’s growing a parasite
Habrosaurus and tanytrachelos are now my top 2 picks for amphibious box
I think Castorocauda could also fit in a Box
Castorocauda (assuming this is accurate) definitely could work
Maybe one or 2 per box
most Mezosoic mammals in general were tiny
Habro is very on the limit
Fair point
Acanthostega?
But I'm firmly believing in the khuli mindset
cue the this box literally has every Mesozoic mammal found in existence joke
(aka khuli copium)
Like veeeryyyyyyyyyy on the limit
So 2m?
Specially since sirens are highly territorial and require quite a bit of space
for Wetland Box
As I said, khuli copium
The box viv is 4^3, correct?
Or 64 cubic meters (I think that's the unit idk I'm American)
1/4 of that is water, so 16 cubed
And a quarter of that water is taken up by land
So 12 cubed
Ok yeah only one habro if any
wait.....
its all.....
tooth fragments.......
"The postcrania! Its-its missing!"
"It's ok, I didn't get it the first time either. There is no postcrania. It's just teeth."
Finding the postcrania of a Mesozoic mammal is the gta6 of the Paleo community
theres like 2 I can think of lmao
thats bad
now that I think about it theres more than that but for more than like 95% they will forever be known from le toofers
are most Mesozoic mammals in general just super fragmentary
basically yeah
honestly the ones on the larger end tend to be pretty ok most of the time
although generally from like
1 specimen to be fair
but most of the smaller ones are just so tiny they dont fossilize well at all
repenomamus for example has multiple specimens
THere's a good amount of well understood ones
from 2 species
to be fair, mammal teeth are very diagnostic so its fine mostly
are Didel or Volatico fragmentary?
no
and in the end the bauplan is basically "rat" if youre going for like a toothed small mesozoic mammal
across multiple specimens but idk
Didelphodon, Fruitafossor, Repenomamus, Volaticotherium, Gobiconodon, Zalambdalestes, Adalatherium, and a lot of docodonts if we count those
Morganucodon isnt terrible either if you count it too
Kayentatherium?
also pretty good
That specific part of the pelvis is enough to diagnose it as a theropod
And because of where it was found its probably the earliest one
Still a bit stupid but it could be worse
Pk’s mono is smaller than that btw
Add nigersaurus
Slightly strange clade ratios
Longisquama and Kuehneosaurus can't even glide
Also all of these except maybe 2 but probably one are vivs
Not really a flyer pack at the end of the day
Heck that's not even a picture of Kuehneosaurus; the wings are too big
Did you get Longisquama as a flier from the Disney Dinosaur movie
We need Nigersaurus.
Unique and small sauropods are fascinating.
why is this all viv species and then Argentavis, and Longisquama didn't even glide
neither can Kuehneosaurus; it's a parachutist
Would Eohippus be better as a full species, or a terrarium animal?
Vivarium
well
would you put a horse in a vivarium is the question
It's like, the size of a cat.
It's TINY
Good thing we PK selection is rather objective with size being main factor
Aside few special cases
Eohippus is I wanna say right around the same size as Leaellynasaura, which is a full species, but I honestly think Leaellynasaura would have been a vivarium species if the vivarium update came out before it
it’s still a horse. wouldn’t it need a lot of space to run around?
Doesnt matter
Huh. I thought it was a little bit bigger. Like Jack Russell size
PK vivariums are based on size
It is so basal a mouse deer or duiker are better comparison
And these are mostly kept indoors
the size of a fox terrier
Point still stands that it's tiny.
Eohippus was about the size of a small dog, so it could probably be exhibited indoors.
It's not that cut-and-dry.
By that logic, Microraptor should be free-roaming because it's a dromaeosaur.
would Propalaeo be the same way too then
Depends on species
One species is small, other is big
Both with excellent fossil record
But, if I am not mistaken smaller one is now called eurohippus
Looks like something you'd fight in DnD.
Early true mammals were so strange. Some pantodonts would be great to see as well.
What the hell is that
Stylinodon mirus, an extremely bizarre taeniodont from early Eocene North America.
Thanks
specifically a fox terrier
Jan 11th, Anteosaurus Magnificus. What do you get when you put a tyrannosaur skull on a synapsid? Well, the largest predator from the entire Permian. It reigned supreme in what was then South Africa, only being done in by the Middle Permian extinction event. It is known from many skulls, painting a very clear ontogenetic series and some postcranial material like isolated hands, feet, girdles, vertebrae, … The adults had a lot of thickening in the skull, suggesting it could have butted heads with others of its kind, though this is still being debated on.
Synapsids in general were such a weird and wonderful bunch.
Surprised you posted Anteosaurus though, most of your daily suggestions so far have been a lot more obscure.
Anteosaurus is pretty underrated imo, always getting overshadowed by dimetro and ino
Also yea, some days a little less obscure than others. Trying to keep it diverse, cuz if not id posting fish everyday lol
This really should be the standard for suggestions
Thx, im keeping it at one a day to avoid over cluttering and i learn many things myself as well
Nice daily habit
I’ve been doing the same thing too
Anteosaurus is peak
Are there any chances that I could recommend you a few I think you should check out in DMs?
so yesterday we had a talk about what vivie animals would fit in a Box-size Amphibious vivarium
what about a Large-size Amphibious vivarium
In a sense large vivarium is the only viable option for animal?
yeah
Maybe koolasuchus
This category is rather restricted to unusual animals from exhibit perspective
Gnatusuchus?
Arthropleura would be the best bet for a large-size only vivarium animal
I see it being proposed here every week or so. Still a good animal, though we need Titanophoneus potens as an alt.
Which Nodosaurid U Take, poll for All Nice People
16
31
1
Borealopelta
Which exhibit marsupials besides Thylacoleo, Diprotodon, Thylacines, and Procoptodon do you most want to see added?
5
14
1
Palorchestes
I'm honestly shocked that Wakaleo got so many votes I almost didn't include it
simply because I think Thylacoleo + Microleo as a viv would be enough for their group but I would still love to see Wakaleo
Palorchestes is absolutely goated though
It's a pet-sized thyla is goated
Just the right size to take a hand without ripping off an entire limb
Both
Just Struthiocephalus then
The blatant lack of eretmorphis is criminal
Could you blame me for NOT having heard of it?
Yesnt
The shark, the shark-sized fish, the mosasaurs, one of the last plesiosaurs, I think one of the last pliosaurs, and the sea turtle
Archelon means 'Lord of the Turtles'
dolichorynchops i think is a polycotylid, not a pliosaur
also neither elasmosaurus or dolichorynchops are the last of their kind
Well it IS a plesiosaur of sorts from what I saw
pliosaurs already i think went extinct by the turonian iirc
Hesperornis not being here is sad imo
Stratodus 😔
Platecarpus was the most common mosasaur in the seaway
Hesperornis isn’t a mosasaur
neither is Stratodus
Hesperornis was a bird
I’d imagine it’d be like penguins where it was clumsy on land but excellent at swimming
well yeah, or like a big loon or cormorant
Its size might make it a large vivarium animal.
definitely too big in my opinion
you’d probably only be able to fit one and even then I’d imagine they were social
In that case, animals on regular exhibits may be more suitable.
Jurassic coast pack*
*shallow seas count
I know they're not all uk genera but you're basically there
Most Jurassic sea life has been unearthed in the UK, and some other places abroad
The Oxford and Kimmeridge Clay sites are incredibly rich bone beds
The wildest thing is that depending on one's definition of a bird it sometimes isn't one since it falls just outside of Aves. Albeit considering most people use bird to refer to Avialae these days anyways it might as well still be considered one.
Interested in the reasons for choosing Tuarangisaurus over other xenopsarian plesiosaurs
Wanted something more obscure, and from Zealandia
Tuarangisaurus may not be obscure anymore because of 'Prehistoric Planet'
I don't think it really latched on to the paleo zeitgeist despite that tbh.
Also, how about Aquilolamna and Parapuzosia (an enormous ammonite likened to the kraken of greek mythology)?
I'm partial to Parapu but I'd probably expect it to come as soon as we get aquatics tbh, rather than in a later content pack. Being the closest thing to a definitive most popular ammonite genus definitely counts for something.
I don't really have much of an opinion on Aquilolamna, though assuming Platylithophycus is in fact a member of its family, it would make for a great alt given the projected size differences.
Jörmungandr, the Midgard Serpent or World Serpent, is a colossal sea serpent in Norse mythology, a child of Loki, who grew so large encircling Midgard (Earth) that it bites its own tail, symbolizing eternity (Ouroboros). Thrown into the ocean by Odin, this monstrous serpent is the destined foe of Thor, and its release from the sea signals the beginning of Ragnarök, the world's end.
Kronos, named after the Titan Kronos
And then they say there were not acuatic dinosaurs
I mean it technically depends on your definition of bird
they are basically on the doorstep of aves but are indeed outside of it
id imagine even more aquatic than that
like a loon
They ARE birds, though. Dinosaurs are birds.
Definitely the right way around
All birds are dinosaurs but not all dinosaurs are birds
What cheese said
The definition of where bird exactly lies is subjective tho
Most typically people either say Aves or Avialae or somewhere in between though
Yeah the exact point at where a dinosaur can be classed as a bird is a bit hazy but if a dinosaur is found to be outside Aves it's probably not a bird
Objectively, dinosaurs are birds.
I go with pygostylia as bird myself but that's just my take, mostly because they have a birdlike tail and therefore almost all of their general anatomy is closer to bird
Someone insane would say all of maniraptora is birds
This debate is over.
Ok I'll hear you out, explain your logic
Everybody knows that birds are dinosaurs.
Because that's kind of like saying all mammals are cats
No, it isn’t. There’s a difference. It is scientifically proven that all birds are dinosaurs.
Yes
Yes but not the other way around
But not all dinosaurs are birds
I think he might be rage bating
It's two entirely different things chat
Perhaps
Birds are a clade inside the clade dinosauria
I meant to say that all birds are dinosaurs.
Ah
Ok yeah that's true
How am I rage baiting? I just misspoke.
Because you reaffirmed your position
You made the same mistake twice, which makes it feel more intentional
All of pennaraptora would count, and the position of Therizinosaurs and Alvarezsaurs is far less stable than usually assumed
But I wasn’t ragebaiting.
I know that know. This is why I said "I think he might be" before you made your position clearer.
Deinotherium for Prehistoric Kingdom is MUST
HELL yeah
(Maniraptoriforms and pennaraptorans are quite more stable than maniraptorans, but, then again, Maniraptora has priority over Pennaraptora if both Theris AND Alvies go to the Ornithomimosaur side; Maniraptoriforms as a whole would feel far more birdlike than Tyrannosaurs, Carnosaurs or Ceratosaurs ANYWAY)
Must of the Must
Prodeinotherium as Alt
I agree, but there are cooler deinos out there.
Deinosuchus Not counts
Deinotherium and mastodon to give elephants equivalents to Paraceratherium and Elasmotherium bwahaha; they only have the Coelodonta equivalent
Deinotherium is mad
Wouldn’t Palaeoloxodon technically be the equivalent to Paracera?
I’m hoping we get both and that they both share different rigs and animations.
Palaeoloxodon must have 3 species and 1 small species
Namadicus, Antiqqus, Recki
And Falconeri
…no, I’m pretty sure just namadicus would work for an alt. species and falconeri would work as a separate genus.
Antiqqus,Recki Too
I’m pretty sure Falconeri could be a Large Terrestrial vivie even.
Meant it in the "giant but distant relative from early on", Palaeoloxodon is a modern elephant that reached extreme sizes at both ends
Deinocheirus and Tyrannosaurus share rigs. I don't think we'd need too many different elephant rigs
And I don't see any reason to have an elephant in a vivarium ffs
Well. It’d fit. But whether or not it’d be a good idea is a different can of worms.
I mean, 196 square meters is quite big
What's the space requirements for a single Velo, Ovi or Lea again?
But still, baby elephants would work well enough anyway
Boverisuchus magnifrons, a land-dwelling crocodilian from early-middle Eocene Germany. It is most notable for having hoof-like toes, which suggest that it might’ve been able to gallop similar to a horse.
Huh, just outside Crocodylia as well, neat critter
alternatively Dentaneosuchus.
when it comes to sebecids I’d prefer Barinasuchus.
we all do.
Sebecus with Barina alt could go hard ttbt
Fasolasuchus better
Fasolasuchus isn’t even a sebecid. What are you on about?
Quinkana better than Sebecus
A quadrupedal predatory land Triassic croc-thing would go hard indeed, but...
We have a slight idea of Saurosuchus' proportions, and Fasolasuchus is highly fragmentary
To be honest, with regards to land crocs, I'm more of a Baurusuchus fan
(not Triassic I'm aware)
Are these those galloping croc things ?
no
If pseudosuchia are added, I would like some diversity, from the famous Postosuchus to the minor Sillosuchus.
ticinosuchus would be a nice one imo
If Hyena get's added it must be Pachycrocuta
dinocrocuta
Quinkana would be cool
Chasmaporthetes
No, Cave Hyena
Chasmaporthetes ossifragus is the only north american hyena and it is cursorial and more hypercarnivorous than durophagus
its def the most unique
I mean I feel like being in the beta Hyenadon is the most likely to get in EA
Sillosuchus is questionable; we don't a lot of it and need Shuvosaurus and Effigia to fill in the gaps. If the game needs a Poposauroid, I recommend Lotosaurus instead.
not a hyena
It’s not?
Not even close
nope, theyre from a completely extinct carnivoran group unrelated to any modern lineage
Megaloceras is at least a deer
I had no idea it was that fragmentary
Yeah but it ain’t a elk
but y’know I still want it in
Or was it that it wasn’t Irish
Certainly, if we're talking about the Poposaurus family, the Rotosaurus might be a good idea.
Also, the Poposaurus itself is good.
Good but we are lacking a complete skull
I honestly like the Triassic quadrupedal ones because they were likely not very croc-like; if anything, resembling stuff like ceratosaurs due to plesiomorphic characters, which is cool as hell
Don't you mean bipedal?
Saurosuchus was a quad
Ah I was looking at Popo
But True
Also I forgot I still had this Nano pfp from the whole event lol
(I'd really enjoy getting both bipedal and quad non-crocodylomorph loricatans, the same way I'd enjoy having Melanoro alongside Plateo)
Without the skull, it may be difficult to create an accurate reconstruction model..
not really, there’s Effigia
be fr rn
Quinkana is just a huge question mark
worse than Barina even
even as someone who wants Quinkana in I have to agree with this ultimately
Big Quinkana is literally a Teeth
Given that a Chinle pack seems more likely than a Ischigualasto one, I'd expected Effigia first
I’d like both. both is good.
I do too
#1360542295228944414 message
Im torn on which species to suggest today
Pick a number 1 or 2, im doing the other tomorrow
1.5
2
Well shit
Aight
Your only choice is to fuse them
Jan 12th, Abyssosaurus Nataliae. As the name implies, this was an Early Cretaceous cryptoclidid plesiosaur that specialised itself for life in the abyss. Discovered in 1992 from Russia, its partially complete skeleton shows many adaptations for deep sea travel; these include thickened bones (easier to sink), broadened thorax (larger lungs for longer breaths), paedomorphism (retaining juvenile traits into adulthood) and unusually large eye sockets. Normally I would be opposed to highly speculative traits. However I would make an exception if one of its skins depicted a bioluminescent body as a fish lure, only for its invisible head to swoop in.
some of these pictures are so creepy
Tmrw is a cenozoic again
Plesiosaurs are weird animals so obviously people will go crazy with the idea of a deep sea Plesiosaur
it helps that we have proof that it likely was a deep-sea dweller
yeah
I think yes
Baurusuchus is what people constantly yern for - fast running croc
If i am not mistaken it is the sleek and fast croc species
Boverisuchus fits the same niché though
I think ive finally made it out of the arthropod rabbit hole, by far the biggest one…
Not as leggy as bauru
It would look more like standard croc in comparison
Gonna have to zoom to see some
If anyone knows any that i might have missed lmk
it’s still crazy to me how big Omnidens was
Unfortunately only known from the mouth appendages and some cranial part i think
might be the earliest (and only, sans Jaekelopterus and Pterygotus) representation for a non-vivie arthropod
Its the most fragmentary on the list but too cool not to include
Otherwise ppl will be asking “where is OMNIDENS?”
SANS
technically speaking “fragmentary” doesn’t really apply to invertebrates since they don’t really have a skeleton the same way vertebrates do
Mongolarachne being too small breaks my heart because it would be so cool to have in-game
Some beautiful mongolarachne art i found throughout my search
paleoart try not to be the most realistic-looking art imaginable challenge (impossible)
lowkey makes me wish I could’ve been there myself to see what the world was like. even if I probably wouldn’t survive.
maybe replace kronosaurus with sachicasaurus?
and maybe diplomoceras as the ammonite?
Why? Parapuzosia has the classic ammonite shape whilst being large enough for a full exhibit animal. It's the best option for the group.
I prefer Krono over Sachi personally
You could probably make both of them and Monquirasaurus alts. (Krono's a mess at the moment)
Aside from the ones we know are coming, the Cenozoic creatures I'd love to have are:
Eohippus
Castoroides
Macrauchenia
Dire Wolf
And Entelodon
lol it looks like the in-game icon for plants
it also has a cute name
Krono won't really be a mess tho; neotype and done, everybody is in agreement
The neotype is official?
when did Krono start being a mess cuz this info is 100% out of the blue for me
pretty sure krono is rather complete.
it’s the most likely pliosaur I could see other than Liopleurodon
Liopleurodon would make people really disappointed seeing it in game lmao
it was about the size of a big sea lion
tbh i have like a top 3 pliosaur wishlist. Lio, Krono and P. funkei. Those 3 are a good baseline.
I know Cruel Sea lied about its size
cruel sea had a lot of anachronism tbh
also, why would Lio dissapoint people. early game needs animals too if aquatics show up 
perfect size.
maybe Simolestes and Attenborosaurus
The holotype was a partial mandible
ofc, and I am not saying it is a bad choice
you said people would be dissapointed.
would Leedsichthys be ‘too big’
And the specimen that is alot more complete consists largely of plaster
The holotype will get replaced with a neotype at some point though
or Titanichthys for that matter
Agreed
That case annoyed me because if you will replace an iconic animal with a new genus entirely you should probably give it a good name
i hope you are aware of the contradiction of saying its not a bad pick vs people would be dissapointed lol.

Liopleurodon would be a good choice because it has name recognition, good material (I think), and would fill a unique niche
But it would also likely disappoint some people who only know it as the giant marine reptile from Cruel Seas when it wasn't nearly that giant or imposing.
these 2 things don't contradict each other
I don't really know who it would disappoint given it's pretty common knowledge nowadays that it isn't a large pliosaur anymore
P. Ferox aka Predator X wouldnt dissapoint if added, just because its media portrayal wasnt entirely accurate.
same with lio imo
I wouldn't be so certain that it is common knowledge
For most people here it is
thats just a clever alt species to add for the early game 
Most people who are in the paleo community as well
Again I think that is a generalization given a lot of people basically only learn from the paleo documentaries and there hasn't been a popular, modern representation of Lio
and cute at same time
If the material was so good, there wouldn't have been any confusion with the size in the first place.
(we do have quite a bit of Lio, but WWD's error should be warning about suggesting animals based on a bone or two)
Forgot Odontochelys the best turtle ever
A lot of people also learn from online sources, online communities, etc
Kronosaurus or bust for pliosaurs
Absolut
I've seen some people suggest Pliosaurus to be the better pliosaur rep because it can cover different size ranges with different species under the genus
But I like Kronosaurus better
i mean the fact that sahonachelys is like one of the vivarium species does seem to indicate that more obscure animals aren't off the table?
They just wanted a prehistoric fresh-water turtle, those are pretty obscure by default even amongst most paleonerds
though wasn't there this big freshwater turtle that was from brazil?
yeah i know that it wouldn't fit a vivarium but you get my point
…that doesn’t change the fact that more obscure animals aren’t off the table.
Probably not the most accurate image
yea. Stupendemys?
i was actually thinking of peltocephalus maturin
What are you, STUPEN???
ngl I feel like obscure animals aren't by themselves a bad inclusion
Like, just because something was pulled from the depths of Wikipedia doesn't make it unfit for the game
what about a metriohynchid?
I definitely want a thalattosuchian at some point ngl
arguably
Metriorhynchus and Thalattosuchus seem to have a Oviraptor-Citipati type dynamic going for them
just about anything deserves to get in
even among dinosaurs, which clades aren't present?
Pectinodon
You have 10 seconds to take that back before I spam the chat 
i meant non-avian
Erythrovenator doesn’t deserve to get in
So basically every MAJOR clade is in the game but there's a few "sub-clades" in a sense that don't have any presence whatsoever
Metriorhynchus and telosuchus I think it is are good
Marginocephalians are represented mostly by ceratopsians, the only "major" ceratopsian clade not yet here is leptoceratopsids
And dakosaurus
ornithopods are actually pretty decently represented and we're only really missing the rhabodontomorph fellas which includes Tenontosaurus and probably Zalmoxes/whatever Zalmoxes might be renamed to
although for saurolophine hadrosaurs having only edmontosaurins is sad
brachylophosaurins and saurolophins pls
then there's whatever clade ajkaceratops and ferenceratops belong to (if it's legit), chaoyangsaurids (yinlong et al), and basal neoceratopsids like aquilops
thyreophorans have a pitiful showing
no parankylosaurs, that's for sure
nodosaurids and stegosaurians as a whole are completely absent (for now)
actually i think stegouros would be good add?
My fav dino
Its telosaurus not suchus
Stegouros is a good addition but I can't deny the power of parankylosaur rep leaning towards Kunbarrasaurus with a Stegouros-like tail for an Aussie pack
Although truth to be told Aussie pack's viability was lowered by including Leaellynasaura and Muttaburrasaurus in the base game
FYI I believe that Pleistocene Australia should be a SEPARATE pack to dinosaurs from Australia
Australovenator/Diamantinasaurus/Kunbarrasaurus/Leaellynasaura/Muttaburrasaurus is a very strong roster
All you've got left are Minmi + Whatever other one similar to it thats out there, Australovenator, Rapator, Australotitan...
Kronosaurus too, though thats for much later down the line I could tell
Procoptodon, Diprotodon, Thylacoleo, Paludirex, Palorchestes, Murrayglossus, Varanus priscus, Wonambi
there’s probably a few I’m missing
The Australian Thylacine, though save that for the R.E. DLC
Thats the common name for the animal dude.
i know that
then why put it with quotations?
you implying the name is dubious???
you tryna start a war??/
a riot???
Eh I'm just goofin around
in terms of other clades that i could think of, i think there aren't any noasaurs?
hypothetical future DLC concept consisting of 6 creatures per expansion
omg i forgot the recently extinct dlc too
i want Masiakasaurus so bad 🥺
More madagascar, eh?
$11.99 each for the Aquatic and Pterosaur DLCs
$5.99 each for the others
Bundles:
Dino Bundle - $9.99, includes Therapod + Herbivore DLCs
Above & Below -$19.99 includes Pterosaur + Aquatic DLCs
Prehistoric Bundle - $49.99, includes all 9 DLC (would be a whopping $66 dollars all purchased separately)
I gotta say I am noticing a very distinct lack of Australia here and I think some of these dlc's are too broad/generic of categories to make much sense
maybe they make sense if the game will only have a short window for dlc and this is all it will get but I do think having a dlc for literally all mammals isn't a likely thing for them to do
with diictodon, isn't lystosaurus kind of redundant-ish?
not if it is the exhibit sized species
would've preferred like placerias or lisowicia for that
also for pterosaur dlcs, where's rhamphorynchus?
those are Triassic tho
Lystrosaurus made up like 90% of vertabrate life on earth at once point and were one of the survivors of the Permian extinction
so i figured itd make sense to have them even if we do already have diictodon
i was considering Australovenator but i didnt have any free slots, it would probably make sense over Masiakasaurus tho
i see but i think i would've put in anteosaurus instead
i mean there's nothing stopping them from making a second mammal DLC, i dont see the issue
maybe "cenozoic expansion pack" would make more sense
anteosaurus is a good pick
Megalania would also be really cool for Cenozoic, maybe replace DInocrocuta with it and rename the DLC to "Cenozoic expansion pack" or something
what about sinomegaceros as an alt for megaloceros?
As far as I recall, people have said something about existing species ingame not receiving anymore alts
With at least one of them supposedly having an exception
i see then
Livyatan isn’t really realistic as you literally cannot keep whales in zoos, and what sea world does is really horrible. Koolasuchus is also definitely too big.
Hopefully it’s Lambeosaurus so we can get Lambeosaurus magnicristatus
is eryops bigger than koolasuchus?
no but probably a lot more active
Literally none of the animals in game are included under any assumption that they could be reasonably kept irl.
Livyatan would still not be a good idea
Neither would megalodon
that's silly
we have the largest land animal ever in the game already
plausibility is long since irrelevant
yeah this game literally has sauropods lmao
Plus there are plenty of animals that can't survive in captivity that we would have no way of knowing if they were fossil species, like Indris or Great White Sharks
If you think Livyatan and Megalodon shouldn't be included because their modern day relatives die easily in captivity then you might as well extend the same to any giant, fully aquatic marine animal because they could have just as easily died in captivity.
Like for all we know mosasaurs were ill-suited to zoos too. These sorts of questions aren't relevant to this game. The only actual species we should refrain from adding are hominines.
or things that wouldn't work for gameplay reasons
yeah
I can understand feeling this way about zoo sims with extant species like Planet Zoo but these are extinct animals and their inclusion in the game would be a net positive when it comes to introducing said species to a wider audience with accurate reconstructions. It isn't something like a whale where people can appreciate them via other video games.
You could release it into the wild and have those portal things that they had between New York and Dublin for a minute
I feel it’s fairly safe to assume that Pachys will get in game but I would like this feathered paleo meme thing to be a skin or variant or something
I also don’t want mosasaurs either
Like genuinely
yeah :( i heard seaworld is pretty awful but could you elaborate? Is this for all whales or just the ones that need far too much space to ever realistically be kept in a zoo and be okay
i know the same thing happens with great whites and other large sharks
Well one, whales, like all other large sea animals, would need insanely large tanks in order to be happy in their habitat. Whales aren't stagnent, they are constantly migrating throughout their parts of the ocean and that's really why they aren't suitable for zoos, the same goes for great whites.
i think there definitely needs to be stricter requirements on zoos giving animals space in general. Seeing leaopords being kept in tiny enclosures always made me so sad as a child
i figured as much
i know Livyatan was a lot smaller than a blue whale and slightly smaller than sperm whales but the amount of space they would probably need is still massive
i imagine that's probably why we'll never get megalodon either if they do ever add aquatics
It's also why they wouldn't likely add Archelon as the same thing applies
oh yeah i forgot sea turtles need to migrate as well
i wonder if the same is true for dinosaurs like edmontosaurus and pachyrhinosaurus. Is it known whether or not they migrated south for the summer? since the regions that some species lived in got pretty cold
This is a game. Not real life simulator.
not relevant for a zoo
that's fair, but what if they still try to migrate? Even birds kept in warm indoor conditions still try to fly south for the winter
that's just nitpicky assumptions though as idk if it's known whether or not any dinosaurs migrated
This is all pretty irrelevant for a video game.
Also of note is there are some whales, albeit few, that do fine in captiviy.
Specifically Belugas.
why
yeah true lol
but PK does aim for some level of realism, that'd being said i doubt they would specifically not add a creature due to speculatory migration needs
restricting all the cool stuff for aquatic stuff for really arbitrary realism would be lame as hell
like why would you do that
"we managed to simulate migration via waterflow technology" or something I don't know
Doesn't need a major excuse.
Or any excuse.
it's a game, let us have cool shit
It's a game, it's acceptable to break from reality for things like this.
Not even a hot take, just a garbage take
“Masiakasaurus isn’t coming” don’t be a killjoy dude
it's one of my fav dinosaurs but i think there's a lot of theropods that are more likely to be added instead. Would be so happy if it was added tho!
i mean there aren't noasaurs so far right?
there aren't a lot of things
Honestly I’d say it’s more realistic than Giganotosaurus
Cus like
Masiakasaurus is a noasaurid
And the giga would be the THIRD large carch in the game after Acro and Carch itself
the humble beluga:
“Carcharodontosaurus with a chin” fans will be outraged if they hear you say that
Carcharodontosaurus without a chin is a meme tho
Giganotosaurus without big nasals is already in-game, so an extra based on that will sell
Lower effort headliner to finance work on more technical stuff and diverse critters
We should get Mapusaurus
It is literally Giganotosaurus but less popular
At least it coexisted with Argentinosaurus
They'd just be alts
Combining those two with Tyrannotitan makes the most sense to me
Would Taurovenator be the only one to NOT be an alt for the others on account of the crest?
Eh, 3 alts that are essentially the same would be boring
Giga + Mapu/Tyranno + Meraxes imo
Meraxes is ever so slightly more unique
Taurovenator's exact position in Carnosauria isn't clear. It's been recovered outside of carcharodontosauridae.
Eh. We don't have a complete skull of these guys so how different (or close) they are to each other is debatable. Meraxes and Carcha are the two we have non-fragmentary upper skulls of.
At times found further away from Giga than Carcha, and not quite that unique?
chubutensis, carolinii and roseae are the same lineage over time pretty much, quite consistently found forming a clade
The the upper skulls of the others range from fragmentary to unknown, whose to say Tyrannotitan doesn't look more like Meraxes.
The uniqueness of the foot claws is also... nah?
We don't have Giga's
I honestly find weird how people hyperfixate on preserved details as "the thing that tells it apart from the others"
It is not clear whether Pachycephalosaurus had feathers all over its body.
If it did, it is thought to have been feathers like those of Psittacosaurus.
I’m not arguing it’s a scientifically accurate representation, just a visually cool one
It’s unlikely a Pachyrhino had fur like in game but it’s there cause it’s cool
Ah, I see.
But judging from the model of PK's old Prenocephale, feathers may not have been added like in Pachyrhinosaurus.
Well im not exactly making a prediction more a “this would be cool”
for such a large theropod i would say its intriguing. but its not a feature i would automatically slap on every other carch just because meraxes had it. Either way Meraxes is rather far down on the wishlist for me atleast in the venue of carchs.
All the games animals already are planned this chat is nothing more than a “this would be cool” chat
Well said
At the moment, I'm fine with getting no more Carchas; Herrera, Cerato, a therizinosaur, Albert, and Deinonychus are my biggest wants for theropods outside of the confirmed ones. And I'd rather the devs focus on getting more cenozoics, paleozoics, and non-dinosaur mesozoics included. Dinos are mostly in a good spot at the moment.
i think cerato is one of my highest wishlisted theropods alongside Concavenator.
third would be Eustreptospondylus.
I hope that there will be as many mammal species as there are dinosaurs, and of course the same for other prehistoric creatures.
dinosaurs are more awesome so more of them is fine
however
there are a lot of weird cenozoic guys I'd like to see
I personally think that having twice as many unique habitat mesozoic dinos as habitat cenzoic animals is fine; dinos are more popular. Having said that, the ratio is currently 4:1. That needs to change.
true
I know that in the future Megatherium, Doedicurus, Ambulocetus, Bos, Daeodon, and Hyaenodon will be added, but even so, I think there are still too few mammals compared to dinosaurs
Ideally, I'd have it as this:
50 dinos (we have 37)
- 20 theropods (currently we have 15 in-game/confirmed)
- 7 Sauropodmorphas (currently we have 5)
- 8 Thyreophorans (3 in-game/confirmed)
- 8 Ornithopods (which we have)
- 7 Marginocephalia (we have 6, so we just need Pachycephalosaurus)
25 Cenozoics (we have 8)
10 Paleozoics (we have 0)
10 non-Dino Mesozoics (again 0)
5 recently extinct (0 again)
That's 100 animals right there. It's a big ask, but I think it works.
we end up with 95 at the end of ea?
Species, not mains
oh yeah
There is also the issue of the Cretaceous lasting longer than the entire Cenozoic (and as long as the Jurassic and the dinosaur-bearing Triassic put together).
Should be 54 spots at least
Not counting vivariums
I'm counting alts and vivariums in that number
Probably,92
this was before mau lied
Mau constantly increase this number with vivarium animals
we're at 72 now
8 in u17
3 in u18
12 in u19
Like I've said previously, I wouldn't be surprised if it gets rounded up to 100 even come U19.
Since vivariums have an amphibian theme, I think Beelzebufo would fit in very well there
let’s see if I can do this m’self
Theropoda (15/20) Acrocanthosaurus atokensis Albertosaurus sarcophagus Baryonyx walkeri Carcharodontosaurus saharicus Coelophysis bauri Deinocheirus mirificus Dilophosaurus wetherilli Gallimimus bullatus Oviraptor philoceratops Spinosaurus aegyptiacus Torvosaurus tanneri/Torvosaurus gurneyi Tyran...
is this not counting viv creatures?
for sauropodomorphs, one could add a mamenchisaur, a dwarf sauropod (europasaurus or one of the hateg island ones), a dicraeosaur, or a rebbachisaur
i think personally i would add a dwarf sauropod and a mamenchisaur
actually for the dwarf sauropod i think maybe it would be a smaller sauropod, titanomachya
it was found in the same formation as carnotaurus
- Mamenchisaurus/Xinjiangtitan
- Amargasaurus
- Europasaurus
- Nigersaurus
it would be a crime to not include Diplodocus so it’s automatically taking a spot
so now I’m only left with one of these
Thyreophora is gonna be a bit more tricky for me
Edmontonia is a must but idk about Miragaia
Kentro or riot
you chose kunbarrasaurus over stegouros?
also i think instead of gargoyleosaurus i would've gone with spicomellus
Spicomellus >>>
Spicomellus is fragmentary though
like
super super fragmentary from everything I understand
Stegouros would work as a vivie imo
I was gonna include Scutello but I feel like it might be the same case as Stegouros
to be fair, it is good for Australian rep
i don't really vibe with gargoyleosaurus tbh
Replaced Gargoyle with Stegourus/Antarctopelta
yeah but i think spicomellus would've been better in terms of a more basal ankylosaur
ah
Theropoda for me so far has been kind of a mess
It doesn't
a noasaur should fill the last spot
I’m debating on replacing Tarbo with something else
isn't tarbosaurus an alt?
what is Pachcephalosaurus grangeri
i think i would go with a noasaur (unless you put that in the vivarium), and one of dilophosaurus/sinosaurus/dracovenator/cryolophosaurus
a junior synonym
It’s the original name before it was synonymized with Troodon wyomingensis
wouldn't it be P. spinifer
I was gonna say Conca but we already have a carcharodontosaur
as the alt
for cenozoic i would definitely want to add a chalicothere
no birds? 💔
I’m saving those for Cenozoic
vivarium has archeopteryx (and microraptor and yi)
keep in mind this is only habitat species so far
i think there should be kelenken?
100% for the Cenozoic
Dromornis 💯
also i know that microraptor and yi aren't "birds"
aka Bullockornis?
I'd say Genyornis since it has a different skull to tell it apart from Gastornis.
realistically speaking I would only add one or two Cenozoic birds to the game during EA
also barinasuchus
but for cenozoic animals, kelenken, barinasuchus, a chalicothere, an entelodont would be nice
nah, Dromornis is the largest dromornithid and adds mid-cenozoic representation for Australia
also ambulocetus?
which is otherwise heavily pleistocene
also deinotherium
Cenozoic is probably where I’m gonna go crazy
I'll just post my dino list
Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis
Coelophysis bauri
Dilophosaurus wetherilli
Ceratosaurus nasicornis
Carnotaurus sastrei
Torvosaurus tanneri/ gurneyi
Baryonyx walkeri
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus
Allosaurus fragilis/europaeus/jimmadseni/anax
Acrocanthosaurus atokensis
Giganotosaurus caroliniiCarcharodontosaurus saharicus
Albertosaurus sarcophagus
Tyrannosaurus rex/Tarbosaurus bataar
Gallimimus bullatus
Deinocheirus mirificus
Nothronychus mckinleyi/Neimongosaurus yangi/Therizinosaurus cheloniformis
Citipati osmolskaeOviraptor philoceratops
Utahraptor ostrommaysi
Deinonychus antirrhopus
Velociraptor mongoliensis
Plateosaurus trossingensis/gracilis
Mamenchisaurus youngi/hochuanensis
Diplodocus carnegii/hallorum
Apatosaurus ajax/Brontosaurus excelsus
Camarasaurus supremus/lentus/grandis
Giraffatitan brancaiBrachiosaurus altithorax
Patagotitan mayorumArgentinosaurus huinculensis
Scelidosaurus harrisonii
Kentrosaurus aethiopicus
Miragaia longicollum
Stegosaurus stenops/ungulatus
Kunbarrasaurus ieversi
Sauropelta edwardsorum
Edmontonia rugosidens
Ankylosaurus magniventris
Muttaburrasaurus langdoni
Dryosaurus altus
Ouranosaurus nigeriensis
Iguanodon bernissartensis
Parasaurolophus walkeri
Corythosaurus casuarius
Edmontosaurus annectens
Pachycephalosaurus wyomingensis
Psittacosaurus mongoliensis/sibacurus/sp.
Protoceratops andrewsi
Nasutoceratops titusi
Styracosaurus albertensis
Pachyrhinosaurus canadensis/lakustai/perotorum
Triceratops horridus
Leaellynasaura amicagraphica
I’ve finished most of the dinos methinks
Camarasaurus moment
i wanted to add a smaller sauropod
time to move to the Cenozoic
where I’m split as to whether or not I should include stuff like Ambulo or wait for pineapple to give his take on what the aquatics should ideally be if they ever get added
like europasaurus, paludititan/magyarosaurus, ibirania, or titanomachya
I was thinking on Europa but we already have a camarasaur in EA
Amargasaurus or Nigersaurus
makes sense to represent all 3 though
amargasaurus with bajadasaurus alt
This is purely terrestrial but Ambulo would make the list
wait actually what about brachytrachelopan?
It's semi-aquatic
fair enough
Plot twist; We get Amargosaurus with an alt, but it's Dicraeosaurus.
sinosauropteryx would've been a nice alt for compsognathus
Vivarium species don't have extra skins, let alone alts.
Paleozoic
Dimetrodon grandis/limbatus/angelensis
Moschops capensis/Ulemosaurus gigas
Cotylorhynchus romeri/hancocki
Ophiacodon mirus/retroversus
Anteosaurus magnificus or Titanophoneus potens
Inostrancevia alexandri/latifrons
Edaphosaurus cruciger/pogonias/boanerges/novomexicanus
Scutosaurus karpinskii/Pareiasaurus serridens
Estemmenosuchus uralensis/mirabilis
Eryops megacephalus
Non-dinosaur Mesozoic
Ornithosuchus woodwardi
Cynognathus crateronotus
Baurusuchus salgadoensis
Desmatosuchus spurensis
Lotosaurus adentus
Shringasaurus indicus
Postosuchus kirkpatricki
Placerias hesternus
Deinosuchus hatcheri/riograndensis/rugosus
Mastodonsaurus torvus/giganteus
I forgot that Mastodonsaurus isn't Palaeozoic
for paleozoic there definitely should be dunkleosteus and a trilobite
fully aquatic so. no.
That would have to wait until we see if aquatics are even doable.
fair enough but there already is tiktaalik
that's vivarium
Tiktaalik's a different story.
that’s kinda different though.
trilobites would also be vivarium
but we don't have aquariums anyway
It's not a free-swimming animal, it follows a semi-predetermined path.
added Megatherium cuz it would be a crime not to
ok then, inostrancenvia, dimetrodon, edaphosaurus
and there should be like 2-3 different species of dimetrodon as alts
hylonomus would be like a vivarium species tbh
only way it’d be viable so. yeah.
Along with Suminia and Coelurosauravus.
what about arthopleura?
Arthropleura is absolutely going into a vivarium.
Stegouros supremacy
As much as i want It for 19 it's a post EA animal
would you put a millipede in a habitat, regardless of its size?
if boa is a vivarium then Arthropleura absolutely would be
Arthro can work on a habitat size wise, but it's a snake but worse, it's 100% a viv
vivarium for Seymouria. unsure about Eryops but I’m leaning on vivarium.
for Eryops it could really go either way
actually for paleozoic basically the non-vivarium, non-aquatic fanuas, they are basically permian stuff
Realistically you can just Skip larval stage
Eryops is like lion-sized
i just want little sail charch
Eryops works fine as an exhibit animal
Cenozoic is filling up FAST
I don't think It would work any other way, at that point make anything below a ton a vivarium
Vivarium Paleozoics:
-Acanthostega
-Arthropleura
-Coelurosauravus
-Crassigyrinus
-Hylonomus
-Mazothairos
-Meganerua
-Platyhystrix
-Pulmonoscorpius
-Suminia
Ideally koola, tremato, mastodono, eryops, etc are free roam but we dont know what devs would decide on cuz theres no precedent
We’ve had that discussion many many times already
Wait till U18
it’s nuts how crazy this has been filling up. I’m gonna have next to no space for anything else in seconds flat.
Megacerops? Uintatherium? Diprotodon?
oh guys btw if we ever get inostrancevia theres a good chance it will be fluffy, or at least have a fluffy skin (official PK concept art btw)
It probably won't
Silvyornis? 
my bias is making me lean on Megistotherium
Why not both
Wouldn't Silvyornis go into the recently extinct roster?
Tbf we have Perotorum, i could see one furred skin
already two birds, that’s enough for EA imo
Depends on where you put the boundary
as i said, a fluffy skin like pachrhino, coelo and dilo
I feel like Perotorum is an old relic
It went extinct like 3000 years ago
A new relic would be nice
what about archaeothryis?
Well for one, I was today old when I was informed of its existence.
Second, I chose to limit myself to 10 species for now and picked what made the most sense, so to speak.
Oh wait nvm it's a synapsid lmao
Why did i think It was an amphibian
An ophiacodont
wait what
I’m tempted to put Coryphodon in but realistically a lot of people who weren’t familiar with pantodonts would be like
“who tf is this”
I mean Archeothryis
You know what's really gonna such for the Paleozoic roster? Silurian rep.
But then again at that point just have Ophiacodon
There's not a lot I can think of that'd actually work, if at all.
Pterygoatus
erm
er
Pterygotus? Megamastax?
erm
Also, Oromycter?
Only pseudo-joking
those are the only ones off the top of my head but even then
Megamastax is just a jaw
I’d like to say Ainiktozoon but realistically. it’s a bit small.
Hey there's still Entelognathus
i just mentioned that
Cool for a smaller Placoderm
reduce this to 7; we already have 3 in game
Only other one i could see would be Coccosteus
This ain't EA-related. This is in general.
Wait three?
Diictodon, Diplocaulus, Tiktaalik
Like I already said, just sticking to an extra 10 for now, may consider more in the future.
Just make a mega list of all species like me 😀
so here’s the final Cenozoic roster for my version of EA. I’m probably gonna have to redo a bit of this.
No homo.
Homotherium?
But how do I make space for thylacoleo?
the one I’m feeling like replacing the most right now is Corypho
Moeritherium can go tbh
Modern moeritherium aint this impressive
I heartily disagree
Idk
I just feel like it's a hard DLC animal
Thylaco could be aswell but not as much
I mean this is all post-ea theoretical anyway.
Coryphodon < Synthetoceras
Arsinotherium > Moeritherium
Toxodon > Uintatherium
would've kept uintatherium, but swap out moeritherium, coryphodon, and castoroides
fair enough
Leave the beaver.
Corypho would be good for a 1-star imo. but so would Syntheto.
Camel>
And we need more hoofstock, anyways.
I actually I'm amazed Gigantopithecus isn't on it (I actually kind of agree)
but what if you replace it with josephoartigasia?
I was debating on Gigantopithecus
Josepho was probably a giant pacarana. not a capybara.
just so you know
ok then
I’d like to have it
Yeah, the capybara analogy is a meme.
well. now that you brought up Josepho I’m split as to whether I should replace Casto or not.
there are various actual capybara adjacent animals
