#Community Species Suggestions
1 messages · Page 63 of 1
It’s also a herbivore, which, I love convergent evolution
Severely uncommon in Theropods
Depending who you ask Berthasaura isn't even a Noasaurid
noasaurs phylogenetic position is far from clear to say the least, elaphrosaurs are also been found outside noasauridae at times
masiaka apparetly might have been a burrowing animal specialist, theres quite few traits that point to that at least
Fuck dinosaurs are cool
For all I know I love Berthasaura
And yes they are cool
For example
Berthasaura
It's uranium itself, fwiw
Thanks for the heads up
Morrison is heavy in uranium-rich rocks and deposits, Salt Wash especially
Radon is an issue with granite soils, but don't recall whose decay chain it is part of; Morrison stuff had IIRC pyrite and something radiactive as potential hazards
Radon is in the chain of uranium
I see
They paint some fossils and put some in special chambers that measure for it
(The paint is lead)
The issue with it is that it is a gas and thus you can end with radiactive dust in your lungs
Lead may be neurotoxic but at least it is stable and opaque to gamma radiation
Too bad it also produces toxic dust
So technically, the non-avian dinosaurs of the Morrison are still dangerous to humans
Technically all non avian dinosaurs are still dangerous to humans if you get hit by them hard enough
Yeah, but when has that ever happened?
If Thylacoleo is added, I'd like a model similar to Prehistoric Planet's design.
Completely dull tan?
Probably
Like almost every other mammal in the game
I really can't wait to see how they will show the Retractable thumb
I mean Satan has a point, even if dull the pattern it's like completely boring comparing to both real animal and PK animals, i would hope they gave it some patterning and slight coloration
(The model is a 10/10 tho)
Oh, I'm also bitching about how drab the mammals are in game
P.Atrox is such a missed chance
I get why deer, bear or mammoth and P.spelaea are dull
But c'mon make Atrox somewhat unique
Smilodon spp. look good tho
Yeah Smilo is great, color/patternful and not unrealistic
Peak mammal desing when It comes to textures
Marsupials tend to get more colorful anyway
But I don't dislike the plain look of the php one
First new PhP season thing i don't like tbh
Marsupials IIRC are tetrachromats, but, c'mon, most diprotodontians are darb
Both wombats and koalas (thylacoleo closest living relatives) are also pretty dull colored
Probably doesn't apply much considering they still decently distantly related
But they could have used them as ref
Like i don't need It to be stricking as a devil but idk atleast give It a darker color not just lion copycat
It might have stripes
Just a more... interesting colouration would be cool
You can kinda see something on the back
Still they will probably be quite dull aswell
Yeah it could well have stripes on the back
Missed opportunity
Might get lynched but i think going for an Ark style colorscheme would have worked so well
Would kill for this in pk
Just add some light strippes on the lower back
Ark's thyla is very nice looking tbh
not much of leaellyasauria either
That's also not Leaellynasaura either
Though, iirc the actual Leaellynasaura remains we have aren't much better
I don't think Leally even has a skull
this was the fist one i found on google mb
Leaellyna is only a skull
Oh i thought Leally was the one that is only a tail lmao
Nope, the tail is referred, the skull is the holotype
Damn, I also thought it was the opposite lol
Looks like that image references a left femur that is referred to Leaellynasaura
And other material also referred (NMV P185990, NMV P185992, NMV P185993), as well as the holotype cheek (NMV P185991)
it's literally not visible so we can't know
once again people jumping onto assumptions and starting useless debates wowee
Is the debate in the room with us
sorry carried out from other places where it's being discussed haha

It seem to also have a darker belly contrasting with the lighter fur color
Imo it's pretty much perfect
he looks so dim-witted 
Borealopelta
Edmontonia
My point was “I want it to be like this!” (literally drabbest thing ever)
It’s not a bad depiction, but it’s funny that you’d want to emulate it of all things.
the copper goat
I’m still pushing the kumimanu propaganda
Honestly with Borealopelta just give Edmontonia a reddish brown skin with a pale underbelly
That’s already exactly what they did with the old model
Like Borealopelta wouldn’t even work as we know what it looked like so it wouldn’t need more than a single skin
I mean can you really blame the devs tho
Megaloceros and Coelodonta and partially Mammuthus is based on actual depictions from life, Mammuthus even has some genetic and mummy evidence
You can say the same about Microraptor given its colors are that of modern birds (Corvids to be exact, Crows and Ravens)
and you can make the case for the paraceratherium/juxia and even sinotherium but like
Then again, its getting those genetic mutations in U16 anyways
generally speaking large naked mammals are greyish brown
Making a Melanistic Microraptor unnecessary, or even pointless
I guess you could say the same about a Leucistic Microraptor?
Not sure.
Oh well, plenty of corvids to take inspiration from for skins in U16
Except its never gonna get another skin cause its a viviarium animal
None of them have more than 1 skin
So its irrelevant to the conversation at hand
although there are a few I think they could have done a better job IMO
two of the ursus skins are basically identical
but like generally speaking you cant really blame them for the mammal skin design being kinda boring, its just realistic based on what we know and safe inferences
we know a lot less about dinosaur intugment and coloration than we do about mammals, so as a result the speculation can be a lot wilder
And reptiles and birds base a lot of their communication on colors and shapes while for mammals its mainly smells
also true
Marsupials and primates are the exception and they are the more colourful among the bunch (tho there are others as well)
And even then they don't have as many crazy colored ones like reptiles
thank you for mentioning marsupials a lot of people forget that trichromacy is quite common in them
Wouldn't go as far as common but yeah it's present
I mean we have found evidence of it in a majority of groups, no?
They don't all have it?
No, a bunch are dichromats
told ya
I mean
Its not something you evolve every day
Convergent evolution as well
Numbat and honey possum are from 2 different groups
Seems reasonable to assume it's basal to the group somewhat
And tetrachromacy is ancestral to all amniotes, so what
Apparently opossums don't have it
wym so what?
The one in the americas
Or not enough studies have been done on them
But they are also their own group
Just because a trait is ancestral does not mean that all further derived members of a group are guaranteed to have it
All opossums are in the americas
i never said that
Just specified since some marsupials in australia are also referred to as possums
opossums = american
possums = australasian
Oh damn
Always thought it was just a dialect thing lol
Quokkas are also thrichromatic
It seems macropoda as a whole has it considering wallabies have very colorful as well
There's like a handful of described marsupial trichromats
Which is why I stated I wouldn't call it common
Yeah
All belonging to different families
It seems reasonable to me to assume others have it as well considering the range of coloration they showcase is decently similar
it isn't like every marsupial has been tested for this, and most marsupials we have tested have proven to be trichromats
so it is likely more widespread than we currently know
Good point, it’s almost as though being a mini exhibit completely negates that issue!
yesnt
I personally use them interchangeably, and a lot of other people do too when reffering to them, but there technically is a correct and incorrect way
Oh I see
they're pronounced more or less the same, but the O is what matters
I actually do know people who pronounce the 'O' in opossum
Inch resting
Most crazy colored reptiles are quite small
The larger the reptile the more grounded they get
Same thing with birds (with very few exceptions like flamingos but that is diet induced)
I would have gone with cassowaries as the "big" bird with bright colors
Even if it's not the full body
Even then it is localized and if you know how "blue" works then it is more of an illusion of brightness
Its not proper blue, just looks like it is
For all intents and purposes
This is a drab animal
And in the shade of the forests it lives in, the blue shades of the neck will blend really well
I mean it is blue, it’s just blue by a different mechanism then pigmentation
The same way the sky is blue
I could have mentioned male indian peafowls, but I don't really consider them "big"
I wouldn't either
Peafowls are an oddity and males do have a high mortality rate for being too flamboyant
So thats the price they pay
About 4 kg, which is the size of the greater flamingo.
this is true as well
but I still feel like dinosaurs would have had on average more intricate patterns compared to mammals of the same size (even if they used duller colors than reptiles and birds nowadays)
doubt it
if anything they probably played more with how scales can transition to different shades of color more easily
take for example this Iguana I took a photo the other day
from afar you might think is just green, but when you look closely you can see how the scales have a more intricate arrange of colors than what it might seem
and overall different tones across the body
also Iguanas unlike a lot of reptiles are proper herbivores and imo, along tortoises and ground birds, the best analogues for non-avian non-carnivorous dinosaurs
Also crocs
They are all very tame, the most stricking one is probably Cuvier's and even then it's still very tame
i was referring to non carnivorus dinosaurs
crocs, large monitors, and predatory birds are great refs for predatory non-avian dinosaurs
Tomistoma spino......
spinosaurids in general I can see having some random striking colors here and there because of their diet high in fish
You’re supposed to
uh-pos-sum
Spinosaurus in particular has massive billboards on its back that wouldn't really influence much how fish under the surface perceive it, so it is one megatheropod I can see going full flamboyant; other megatheropods would do with their headgear and be more subdued. And, of course, greens can work as camouflage in scaly animals in a world where megafauna is tetrachromat rather than dichromat
But yeah, patterns and high contrasts fade in larger animals
Honestly, I am quite excited for the Stegosaurus scutelings, to see what kind of pattern they bring to the table hehe
Not SUPER prehistoric, but I don't care. She's extinct and did live during the Pleistocene as well.
okay.. but what actually is it
Bennu heron
Its known from a single bone and it's validity its disputed tho
And most likely it wasn't getting that big
Would just be nice to be told what it is instead of just an image next time ^w^
That's not much to go on
This is all we have
And egyptian depictions don't matter because they didn't really size things consistently
For reference
The one on the left is a smallish stork and the one on the right is a goliath heron
From what we have, it seems to be bigger than the goliath, but it also would be nowhere near the size a lot of depictions seems to give it
So, what it looks to me (just based on size of the distal head) that it was maybe a bit bigger than the Goliath, but likely not by much?
Specifically, this stork, which reaches heights of one and a half meters
Saddle billed stork
Here they have have a different name I had to search it up lol
Also even if it was as long as the stork one (already unlikely) it would still end up shorter because the tarsusmetatarsus in herons is shorter than it is in storks
That is a downright cowboy you got there. Get that stork a cowboy hat.
He gonna bring the cows home.
Aerial cowboy, the first of his kind. Nips from above, no potential collateral damage.
I'd see it maybe reaching where the label for 15 is?
Yeah possibly
Which is also could be within the range for both goliaths and I think grey herons as well (tho way more rarely)
So nothing truly crazy
Giant marabous could be fun ttbt
Huh, i thought we had plenty of remains from the bennu heron because they were buried with mummies etc
Perhaps i was thinking of something else
I mean tbh if we have Panthera (don't get me wrong i love panthera) i don't see why this would be off the table
Filler for sure but It could be fun filler
How about the fact we have almost nothing of it
There's so many extinct cenozoic birds to choose from and you want to choose a species that barely has a bone to its name?
Whelp, that’s their choice. And this is a wish list anyways where any species, likely or unlikely can be suggested.
ofc it is their choice but it isn't like choices are immune to criticism about them, otherwise all this channel would be would be listing species we want without any further discussion
Like I don't care for the suggestion of Leptoptilos robustus but there's actually some decent remains of it and something worth discussing here
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.220435
The big question is whether it's flightless or not
Flores pack
Flores pack scares me because it will lead to people clamoring for That species to get added
It must
Sounds like what someone who needs hobbits would say
Florians scampering through your park
I mean I could see smaller ones having bolder colors
If your immediate thought of ancient Flores is the like one homo sp that lived there, that's more of a you problem (using the general you here, not specifying anyone in particular)
define small
like around this size
Puntable size
in my mind if they were smaller and/or closer to aves then they might be more colorful? But idk
cookable
I meannnnn, is it wrong to say it is the most well known species of ancient Flores?
Tastes like chicken
like I'm pretty sure people are more aware of it than anything else from there
Purely because the "marketing" around it was that they were irl Hobbits
even the giant stork is only well known because of how it likely preyed on said Homo sp
Which coinsided with the movies releasing
at the same time I guess they could've been more drab with little areas of color like ungulates of similar size
But I was specifically meaning in a zoo game context
I see that I didn't make that clear though, so my b on that
its ok
Huh, neat, frugivore Varanus
probably not super flashy, keep in mind most bright birds are either tiny, can fly, have a very specific diet, or an extreme case of dimorphism (peafowls)
most ground birds around the size of the hypsi arent that flashy, though well camouflaged for sure
or concentrated on a small part of the body
true
Still, female green peafowls still retain the bright colors of the male, and, once again, camouflage may have worked differently if the predators could tell orange from green, as most reptiles and birds can but most mammals cannot; camouflage versus mammalian predators could be different than camouflage versus theropods after all
That said, contrast would be a nope on small herbivores I assume, unless they broke their silouette that way
But green scales would have more positive selection than an equivalent would have today, I believe; still, leave intricate patterns to displaying males with a harem-based group
I feel like cassowaries break this code with their flashy head.
Cassowaries are larger than the predators in their environment
also when I say colorful is the whole body
not just a part of it
because like i said, cassowaries are drab animals for 90% of their body, and that can camouflage with their environment without issues
oh yeah for sure, even then the females with some slight color in them can camouflage because its not flamboyant
Some colourful ones : Night parrot, brush turkey, lyrebird, Bowerbird, purple swamphen, Indian ringneck, nicobar pigeon, southern ground hornbill, helmeted guineafowl, takahe.
male ostriches can get pretty colorful in their necks
pretty bright red or in the case of somali ostriches, blueish grey
not particularly bright but still pretty cool
man i gotta be more descriptive
when I said colorful is when people draw triceratops like a macaw
that type of colorful
Ohh
oh yeah nah thats unreasonable
I understand
although saying that I think it could work for like fully grown adult sauropods since they had basically nothing that can touch them so they could afford to be extremely bright
I dont think its likely at all lmao but it could be a possibility at the very least
more justified than putting it on an animal thats getting actively hunted very often
100%
even then if you are a large animal that can get weak through sickness and injuries, i dont think being a giant billboard of multiple colors will help at all
It seems the larger things get, the less colourful they become going by irl animals. Giraffes even with their markings are still brownish
very true
indeed
there are a range of colors that are easy to produce
browns are common because of it
among most land animals, aquatic animals is a whole different realm
Red gene is easy to produce
brown is also a color that comes from other colors
comes from reds, oranges, yellows, greens
Doesn't it all derive from the same gene TYRP1?
idk, i dont know with such level of detail
makes me wonder
whats the default color?
white?
see through?
and if so I imagine most if not all animals before sight became common were probably the same basic color
Black is the default for eumalenin, red for phaeomelanin
pinkish seems to be the case as seen in albinos since thats with no pigments whatsoever
which makes sense since thats the color of the inside of vertebrates, reds
morbid but funny 
for some reptiles it can look yellowish but i assume its because the scales reflect the light so they look more "yellow"
Browns can appear green/purple in shadow or red/orange in light. Which is probably why it's such a default colour as it can provide good camouflage by using light/shadow
Thickened keratin takes a yellowish hue; relatively easy to see in human heels hehe
Still, structural color is color, no need to reduce discusion of it to pigmentation
Carotenoids may also have it easier to get into scales and feathers than into hair
As I don't think many mammals use them the way reptiles do
And, again, reddish tones are common because most megafauna today are dichromatic mammals which dont differentiate reds and greens, while reptiles as a rule are tetrachromats with cone cells for red, green, blue AND ultraviolet; can see more pressure for greenish tones than in modern ecosystems, and those are relatively simple for reptiles, combining yellow carotenoids from their diet with blue structural color
But that's not a macaw Triceratops, oh no
Fan art of an Austroraptor has been posted reddit, and I think it's a design that could actually appear in the game.
https://www.reddit.com/r/pkgame/comments/1ojd3bw/as_a_follow_up_to_my_last_post_heres_an/
Honestly that skin rocks
Can I get uh Nanotyrannus
no
Just use a juvenile T-Rex
no
We are alredy get Nanotyranus.
it come with eggroll
wouldve agreed with this in The Old Days but it might have looked somewhat different so
instead we wait for dryptosaurus and use a juvenile of that /j
i am awaiting the paper to make a decision
the trifecta of tyrannosauroids that will trigger #1360542295228944414
nanuqsaurus
dryptosaurus
nanotyrannus
nanuq my beloved
Nanotyrannus triggers no one know
How do you know it's coming?
pk devs are gonna feel real silly bout their statement made during u14's development
Nanotyrannus with its 100% complete skeleton and skin impressions
The cosmos smiled back at nanotyrannus after years of being denied
this is actually really good looking
I like the spots on the tail fan & arm feathers
Nanotyrannus has quickly become my most wanted Mesozoic Theropod and I'm not even joking
If we get another tyrannosauroid I’d want Alberto ofc and then yuty followed by maybe an alioramine
Nano is cool (especially if it’s a dryptosaur) but it’s further down the list for me
Nano is like my sixth in line in terms of tyrannosauroids
Agreed
Alberto stays ontop
Alberto/gorgo
Yuty, Magaraptor of some sort, Alberto, Alio, Guan, then Nano
A bunch of well known mid sized carnivores aren’t in
Alberto, bary, carno, allo etc
Will be good when they get filled out
Imho all the "good pick" tyrannosauroids (basically just what's been mentioned plus drypto) are all approx in the same "tier" with megaraptorans a bit higher
like give me any two or three and ill be entirely happy
ok but truly Nano has come in with the steel chair and at least risen to the top 10 most wanted mesozoic theropods yes?
very wanted for sure
Theropods as a whole?
Nope
Definitely not
If nano is added, wouldn't they have to remodel the adolescent rex?
no
why is there a discussion about nano in this channel and science chat 
nano is everywhere
because one is a discussion about nano as a thing and one is about nano as a PK addition
Because we’re talking abt wether it would be a good pick for the game
So many animals to add before it ....
Because He has risen
good point
We live in a post-Nanotyrannus world
Nanotyrannus is basically already in game
Nope!
the date is currently 0 AN (After Nanotyrannus)
amazing sentence
I think Nanotyrannus beats Alioramus
Actually has a described adult and is outside Tyrannosauridae
Yeah but alioramus got a funny skull shape so I keep my agenda up and running
more like Alio-lame-us
Im on team Alioramus
We need Columbian Mammoths for Update 16
Mammoth in vivarium
Thats just the Wooly Mammoth...
The unconfirmed species are all vivarium species
U16 is all vivarium animals and the columbian mammoth was spotted on a “post ea idea list” teased by the devs which imo makes it unlikely it’s coming in early access at all
I desperately hope the fish eating one is halz but that’s far fetched
I’m guessing it’s the semi aquatic mammal
The amount of water in vivarium is still interesting to me
I assume it is meant for more aquatic critters like tiktaalik, which would swim most of the time
Didelphodon?
Could be
We don't know but take a guess
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1F-sJITBp8YM7yTzwFtULWYcKgjCoPDy8oCd0tpWvmfU/edit#responses
If we're getting Mononkyus, and that seems likely, then no, that one's not needed
Do you guys think vivarium animals could have alts? Technically Archaeopteryx is like an alt of Microraptor
No alts
No
Im a bit late to the conversation, while the Nanotyrannus information is cool I’d still say that Albertosaurus and Yutyrannus are ahead in terms of priority
I’d also put Guanlong above it as it’s an actual small theropod, which the game is lacking, plus being an animal that was previously planned
I agree
Guan would be wonderful
Guan is criminally ignored when talking about Tyrannosauroids
We need more small animals, the Tyrannosaurs are kind of famous for humble beginnings, so Guan is really relevant.
I consider Albertosaurus/Yutyrannus/Guanlong to be the golden trio of actually necessary Tyrannosauroids, everything else is just a nice addition
I think most people just forget proceratosauridae is part tyrannosauroidea
Which is not helped by the very deceiving name
Yeah true
has nanotyrannus been proposed here yet
Yes
good
Whenever a debate on Tyrants is held everyone agrees on Albertosaurus and Yutyrannus, but Guanlong hardly ever gets mentioned
I rarely talk about the 2 groups together since they are pretty different animals all things considered
Same with megaraptors
Kinda like comparing megalosaurus to baryonyx
I'm not sure where to put this, so..are they gonna give the triceratops species quills? They found a muffied one that suggested they might have, and looked like this. Maybe as an alt skin?
Mummified*
they didn't have quills
They have "nipple scales" which the triceratops already has in game
Ah, alright.
I think there’s too many palaeontology terms that have to do with nipples.
It just feels wrong.
Don’t lift up your shirt
Starting with nipple teeth.
Cope's Nipple
I love Alioramus but... idk
Did y’all watch Ben G Thomas and so that’s where we got here?
Y’all were talking Nanotyrannus and Alioramus so that’s why I brought that up.
Every chat was blowing up bc the paper
Honestly, it pisses me off how nothing in these damn bones can provide concrete evidence of one thing.
Like, WHY????
Wdym
The paper is pretty convincing
100% skeletally complete, integument preservation
About as cut and dry as we can get with science
No. Not that I don’t believe, just up until now how come we haven’t been able to get to that. But again, all I can do is scream at fossilization.
Validates N. lancensis, sets out sp. nov. lethaeus, and even erects Nanotyrannidae
Age old assumptions, and shoddy citations
They probably weren’t even the proper APA. Or whatever is most commonly used for paleontology citations.
The formatting was fine
Anyways, I actually can’t believe how many reclassifications in the last few years we’ve had. I mean, did y’all hear about the giraffe species reclassification?
Though if one of their phylo results bears out then I’d think Nanotyrannidae would be a junior synonym of Dryptosauridae
In passing, but I also don't care about giraffes
I'd take it to have it be true
Because that would be super cool
because the bones now are actually looked into more detail than just being handwaved as "ontogeny"
also the Dueling Dinos fossil was only recently available for study, so alot of traits diagnostic with Nano was kinda gatekept there since it was in private hands until like last year
the bones are undeinable, its that people didnt actually look at them
^
for example Nano's sinus cavity is entirely different than rex
also there wasnt a consistent ontogenic model back then beyond "this thing looks small, and some specimens are immature"
sinuses, tooth count, extra finger, and DD Nano being a mature adult points it to being distinct
its insane to say otherwise
and the models of it being distinct and not just ontogeny is consistent with living crocs we see today
otherwise the Chinese alligator would be considered a juvenile of another larger species
Me if I was there:
also i didnt watch Ben G Thomas for the past few months
just watched Skeleton Crew's vid on it, and beforehand the summarization of it in Twitter by the author himself
both are made by the same person, being the author of said paper that is
I only got back into watching some stuff tonight. I go through a period of when I watch certain channels, stop, then go back.
PBS Eons is the one that started me off.
i actually forgot Ben G made a nano vid before the paper came out
co-author, let's not forget Dr. Zanno
Not happening
That ain't a vivarium critter
Every animal for U16 will be a vivarium critter
If this was a Victorian zoo sim, then yes, I could see an elephant being put into a vivarium
FWIW, Nanotyrannidae is the iffiest part of the paper; if clading with Dryptosaurus, Dryptosauridae is already in usage for Drypto > Tyranno, and has 135 years of priority. The arguments for not using it don't really stand well.
So, Lancian Dryptosaurid, cool stuff
I thought only one of the matrixes grouped Nano and Drypto together
(So is Dryptosaurid Appalachiosaurus, which I argued not long ago about never being found that way; neat stuff this new topology)
Yeah, but when Nano is grouped with Drypto, Dryptosauridae has priority
Dryptosaurus is a Lancian dryptosaurid
welcome back nanotyrannus
I don't remember that being stated
Temporal-wise, yeah, but I believe Lancian applies explicity to the faunal stage in Laramidia
Oh right
Cool stuff this week, with the Ojo Alamo timeframing going on as well
The important thing to know about Dryptosaurus is that it has more drip than any of us can ever hope to have.
Who knows, maybe we will be witness to more clarifications of famous fossils in the next few decades, let alone in the next few years.
Well now that Nanotyrannus has become valid once again, it should be added BUT...
Get Dryptosaurus with them too
I guess
🤷♀️
It as a drypto alt would be awesome
Better have it the other way around
Idc either way
Nano is more complete and would sell better
Assuming of course they are closely related enough
Lancensis, letheaus, Drypto would be nice far down the road
But I’m not desperate for it
I see no reason for Drypto
I agree
Basilosaurus
Its for the ghost diplocaulus
It doesn't add another slot because it's ghost so technically still 9
Best to assume 9
Got it
Seems to be 9
always allow for surprises but keep expectations at 9
Truth
Stagonolepis
Was this the guy with the armored cloaca
It would be so cool
I’m honestly not like, clamouring for nano as soon as possible yaknow
Just cause there’s still a bunch of stuff on it that’s in the works
Like the skin impressions
But it is DEFINITELY something that I would fucking love to see them tackle
And as a longtime Drypto enjoyer getting it alongside the nanos would be so damn good
Regardless of how the family tree shapes out they seem similar enough to be convincing alts
N. lancensis, N. lethaeus, Drypto power hour
Those would be perfect for a Cretaceous NA dlc
The main carnivorous course of the pack
Appalachi is also a cool critter that could tag along
Real
Could even get away with putting em in like, an islands pack
Since both Appalachia and Laramidia were islands
And could help prop up the pack with nano’s name appeal
builtin codpiece
"Nano is more complete" shouldn't be an argument. we literally just got a 100% complete skeleton. obviously, its more complete
Please
They ment that Drypto should be based off of Nano’s model if they were alts because nano is more complete
My point will stand as a general point then
No, that's Typothorax
Idk what this guy could offer then than other aetosaurs couldn't
...
...
I'm not sure what kind of point you're making
Really cool that not only do we get Nanotyrannus confirmed but also a brand new species!
Non-tyrannosaurid Tyrannosauroid in the Lancian biota is clear cut proven, but there is still work to be done to sort material out now that we know that; the Dryptosaurid hypothesis is compelling as well, but now we'd have 3 of those living at the end of the Maastrichian, so gotta sort out how they relate to each other, and more Appalachian stuff would help
Between this new specimen and the original Drypto we are getting a good idea of how the adults looked, as Jane was still growing
Will laugh my ass off if we end up with Dryptosaurus lancensis lol
Just send out all the paleo enthusiasts into the Appalachians with armoured trucks, shovels, and everything. Let’s go find more fossils!
jk at this point I'm open to almost anything
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Egypt_Formation Drypto comes from marine deposits it seems tho
The New Egypt Formation is a Late Cretaceous (late Maastrichtian-aged) geologic formation of the Monmouth Group in New Jersey, United States.
Not dwarves in any case, just not giants
May I present this as a new wish list dino of mine: https://www.reuters.com/resizer/v2/WGX6AZ7K4VPQ3LLPMWNYEUNQCQ.jpg?auth=30ea6d860120e0fd6d2479cfe6ec045d9c328ce156e50a1ac3dac0215d981a0e&height=2400&width=1920&quality=80&smart=true
Spicomellus.
the spikysaurus
Spikiest anky.
Bro really said I am the precedent. None the others can touch.
Literally and figuratively.
is it just me or has this year been really backloaded compared to other years in terms of groundbreaking finds
Idk, Homotherium cub was last year
I mean there was Duonychus
but other than that yeah not much
Homotherium biggest find of 2024 definitely
that's not on the level of Nanotyrannus or the major finds of other years
2025 it will almost certainly be Nanotyrannus
IMO the homotherium cub is more groundbreaking than nanotyrannus validity
Pfff
I feel like Nano is a bit above the cub because of how much history is behind it
I wouldn’t be so sure
true, it is a bit early to call it
hasnt even been a week yet
like the cub dropped out of nowhere but Nanotyrannus has had literal decades of anticipation
very true
I could also just have pleistocene bias, but I think finding an entire intact corpse of a lineage with no close living relatives is very very interesting IMO
*carcass
beat out second place with Coelodonta by several million years
Corpses are humans and near-humans smh
Idk why people have started using it wrong in the last few years
I mean language do be fluid but yeah u right
I see no benefit to mixing them up
terminology aside, I think that that factor alone makes it more interesting to me at least, and more relevant to general paleontology
I mean Bloody Mary is 98% complete
if we are just considering mesozoic shit though nanotyrannus might be like the best thing within the past decade ngl
And has skin impressions, although they’re not discussed yet
dont quote me on that, but its a possibility
would need to wait more ofc to figure that out completely because recency bias
yall aint ready
2026, elasmotherium mummy (hornful)
last stegosaur, 2027
thats it, that how science peaks
how are you forgetting the rediscovery of giant fossas
Well potentially from what I've read but yes, that's pretty insane in its own right
As stated by the blog, this animal might be critically endangered or straight up extinction, but I have hope, I have cope, the thought of someone finding this kind of animal still alive and taking a photo of it it's just too amazing
Lmao, what?
I am saying it will happen in the future and be bigger than those other future discoveries
Giant fossa aren’t even confirmed to be a valid taxon
did you not read Darren's blogpost
that's gonna be insane if true
Oh
he literally teases that there is some news related to this at the very end
indeed
out of all the extinct malagasy species C. spelea got the best chance to be rediscovered IMO but theres increasing evidence that a surprising ammount of species held on untill like
the 1700s and 1800s
so I wonder if theres a possibility any other than the Giant Fossa still survive
probably not
mostly eyewitness accounts tbf, but even the most recent subfossil remains are pretty consistently in the early 1600s at the latest
dependent on the species ofc, elephant birds were quite a bit earlier
Monkey lemurs
Not based on evidence or anything, this is my solid vibe based analysis
my honest guess is Voay
apparently there was actually a skin collected at some point in the 1800's by a french guy which is lowkey insane
How inland were voays
might just blend in with nile crocodiles in madagascar
inland
If I'm being honest giant fossas are probably the only species I can possible see being still living
remains were found inland in southernish madagascar
there is one other
the Kisoala
probably
Voay not sure, feel like we would have found something by this point
although I do think that if the eyewitness accounts have credence, that a vast majority of them survived far later than even the most recent dates of 1600's in the bone record indicate, possibly around the late 1700's to early 1800s for a lot of species
elephant birds are lowkey the exception as we pretty solidly know they were dead by 1400 at the latest
hippopotami could make sense as they have some of the most recent accounts as recent as the 1970's but I feel like out of everything other than elephant birds they would be the most painfully obvious for us to find
crocodillians, fossas, and lemurs at the very least have similar looking animals to blend in with / be mistakenly identified, but not hippos
Although interesting, I caution these things
yooo
Everyone knows how incredibly unreliable eyewitnesses are
the kisoala is said to be elusive because it rests in the highest trees during the day and only comes down at night
The poster does say it lived until quite recently
At least we have evidence of it
I buy that
sounds like tree kangaroos
there are multiple for the Kisoala from a specific region in Madagascar
although I would say madagascar is a bit more populated and well explored than Papua New Guinea is, but still, I think its a possibility
Multiple what?
and the researchers here take extra precautions when talking to the locals to prevent biases
sightings/accounts of seeing them within the past 100 years
I mean but how many sasqautch eyewitness accounts are there?
They aren't being sighted by people with smartphones or cameras
This is certainly interesting and should be looked into, but without physical evidence I would not consider these accounts reliable.
these are rural indigenous malagasy living in the forests decades ago
imagine how funny it would be if PK added some holocene island species only for it to still be alive 💀
Would go hard
heres the citation for that btw, I think its from the same paper as that poster from above is actually
Saddening
wtf happened to it?
What happens to all cryptozoological physical evidence
It fades to legend
(There’s actually a handful of physical cryptozoological evidence that still exists but no one cares to even look at it)
One reported Voay robustus (skin, skull, and skeleton of a full adult) from Lake Alaotra, shipped to the natural history museum in Paris in the late 1800s, was catalogued and then described by Vaillant and Grandidier (Reference Vaillant and Grandidier1910).
so reading that- if.. big IF this is true: Pachylemur was a red eyed screaming creature
Described? Where’s the paper?
Ok but I am just saying that if any other subfossil species from Madagascar is still alive that isn't the giant fossa, it's the Kisoala
this is the paper the quote above is from
which I truly hope is still alive because an even larger extant lemur would be amazing
and here is the book it was actually quoting
yeah and what is fascinating is that this matches the behavior of ruffed lemurs
holocene island extinctions are like the only "cryptids" I'll even consider buying, if you even want to call them that
- those supposed big dragonfish
Valiant and Grandidier 1910
also can we appreciate how cool the name "Kisoala" is
literally means "Knife of the Forest"
isn't it possible it was just a really bad account of one of them-
well no because these accounts are from people who regularly see regular ruffed lemurs
also, it having sharp claws is curious...
This is written in Black Speech
primates don't really have "claws"
I guess so yeah
French? 😭
french paper, immediately invalidated argument
From the few paragraphs I can read, it seems to say that it's skull was quite different from the nile crocodiles
what
the sightings never mention sharp claws
But I can only see it talking about its teeth and mouth, there might be a mention of the horns but as I said, it's just the preview
and has just been collecting dust for some 130 years
oh my b
that is straight up where the name kisoala comes from
so whatever these "claws" are must've been a major feature
and never bothered to look, its happened before
Maybe not too unlikely ngl
Considering how many artificats get lost
exactly
possible it got categorized as a different crocodile and faded into obscurity somewhere in the collection
it says the Knife name comes from its sharp call piercing through the forest
"Its claws are sharp and its call as loud as thunder; this is why the animal is called kisoala (kiso = knife, ala =forest)
they said the call followed by said sound being "like a knife"
Its referred to as crocodylus madagascariensis
I mean Voay has a very fucked skull
ohhh
ok idk that's really weird
yeah thats the part that wouldnt make sense
the skin I could definitely see getting misplaced but the skull I doubt
It's possible they just grouped it together with other crocodile remains
especially dependent on how close it looked to say, a nile crocodile skin
we cant know since we obviously dont have the skin to look at
Does anyone have like the full paragraph I can read
so when they say "kiiiiiing" that's basically describing the sound of a knife moving against something?
but someone should really take a deep dive into the collection and see what they can find out about that
about crocodile remains from madagascar during the late 1800's
no clue how museum categoriziation works tho
probably isnt that simple
Gigarcanum I would say is quite different from other geckos and also was collecting dust with no name no nothing attached to it
yup
also in a museum in france oddly enough
so I would say its 10000% a possibility its just still there just waiting
even if that doesnt nessicarily mean Voay is alive today, which it almost certainly isnt, survival into the late 19th century is still very intriguing
it was rediscovered in like
1980's
and almost certainly in there since like 1830 due to the way it was taxidermized but possibly as late as 1870
either way more than 100 years in the collection just collecting dust
no they are mimicking the sound it made and emphasizing that it was ear-piercing
I know
I mean when they say it's knife like
they're comparing it to that
I found the book
Where does it talk about the skin
They talking about the scales
But not sure if it could also refer to the osteoderms
nah, the cub is huge but Nano throws a lot more stuff into question
Nanotreallytyrannus
Apparently this is the nile crocodile? Then why does it says its reffered to as voay while the other (c. robustus) is referred to as mamba
I thought mamba was the nile crocodile
What's the question? I'm lost.
Okay, C. madagascariensis is considered a subspecies of C. niloticus, the nile crocodile
Whos who
I'm trying to find the paragraph where this book talks about the skin of voay, but I think I confused the 2 and read it wrong since its in french
Mamba is another word for the nile croc, in Swaihili
I know, that's why I'm confused
If c. robustus is voay, then why is c. madagascariensis referred to as voay and this one as mamba
I reread it and that what it says
Maybe it changed with time, or they got wrong info and mixed up the 2
Or madagascariensis got lumped into niloticus and the name always referred to robustus
When's the book from. Crocodylus has gone through changes on what gets included doesn't
Its a very old book
Like late 1800s
Voay was only given its genera name in 2007
Okay, I would not really put much trust in a book that old
True, just made my read more confusing
I think I found the paragraph I was searching for tho, where they talk about the possible skin of robustus
And who knows if that skin actually belonged to robustus
We need Triassic Pseudosuchia.
Voay wouldn't be bad as a species for a RE pack
There's already lots I wanna see, maybe for a possible wave 2
Either voay or hanyusuchus
I hope gigarcanum is the plans as well
he smile
How many animals RE would need to include voay tbh
??
Even with crazy big 10 animals in pack I struggle to see it making in
Its not really well known, but if they feel like adding a reptile its there
Probably not, even if the old RE kickstarter image is no longer indicative of the devs' preferences. I can imagine them feeling that Deinosuchus (which I think is coming but can not say with certainty) already covers the extinct croc role. On the other hand, there's quite a few decent recently extinct megafauna from Madagascar that would work in a pack.
Deinosuchus being the only standard looking croc sounds scary
I personally would be prefer (again assuming that Deinosuchus is coming) a giant tortoise for the RE reptile. We have a fully taxidermied Cylindraspis vosmaeri specimen after all.
This is not saying I don't want Voay and/or Hanyusuchus. I like them as well.
That true, a tortoise would go hard as well
I really hope ceratosaurus is in the game
Probably,cerato is comming after EA.
Then if we can somehow get camptosaurus and diplodocus in the game the Morrison would be more or less complete
yes
Allosaurus and Stegosaurus will be available in Update 17.
And I’m so excited for it
Right now im making more open Morrison exhibits, I’m excited to make more standalone ones for allosaurus and stegosaurus
if we get dryptosaurus I hope it gets a leaping laelaps reference animation
A Madagascar DLC pack would be amazing, including Mesozoic dinosaurs like Majungasaurus and mammals like Megaladapis.
heres what wikipedia says
so probably robustus
We need Archicebus i mean look at this ummm "Cute" fella
Feel like Barosaurus and Supersaurus would work well together
Both are below Diplodocus in priority for Morrison sauropods
Still would be nice to see the two in the future
There should be at least two non morrison sauropods added before any other ones
Once Diplodocus is in I think we’re done with Morrison sauropods tbh
yeah
If I'm guessing both diplo and cerato would come relatively early after ea
The Morrison is very saturated, but diplodocus is just iconic
Not low
But not extremely high either imo
It has more chances of making it in than alioramus
As much as it pains me to say it
Tho I feel like alberto it the most likely among the bunch as of rn
^
Not counting yuty
Alberto seems likely
Alberto/Gorgo is a must.
And Yuty
I’d personally prefer Guanlong over Nanotyrannus
Tbh I’d rather we get an actual small theropod than another mid sized Tyrannosoid
Why not both.
I mean in a game with limited resources to add everything, every addition is competing
That's literally like comparing Velo and Utah
But I’m not going to get into that argument so agree to disagree
Yeah they share a family and general body plan but they don't compete at all for a spot
Nanuq is literally just Alaskan Alberto
10 years ago yeah sure why not but now that Prince creek isn't a polar dwarf formation there's 0 reason to add it
Dippy would make for good dlc
Closer to Alaskan Daspleto
The one way I accept Nanuk is as a Daspleto alt ttbt
The Nano paper has now 3 trans-Bering dispersal events, plus Tyrannosaurus crossing from Asia, so Alaskan Tyrannosaurids can be Albertosaurs, proto-Aliorams, proto-tyrannosaurins, and outright proto-Tyrannosaurus
If added to PK, Nanotyrannus would be one of the most complete species in the game
-# A sentence I never thought I’d say
Besides the Pleistocene animals
Scelidosaurus does it and no one gaf smh
actually a p solid suggestion. plus its a good pairing with Yi
One jaw fragment and a partial hip with some leg bones...this thing is even more complete than nanuqsaurus
To be fr for a second, its not really terrible, esp as a vivarium animal
I feel like there's more complete basal marginocephalian to pick from tho
But like the dinosaur with the longest name and the animal with the shortest name (potentially [very potentially] in the same update) would be pretty peak
Would be kinda funny yeah
Tho
Parapropalaehoplophorus is the same length and a viable pick for minis
Just saying
that's why i mentioned it being a good pairing with Yi- the dinosaurs with the shortest and longest generic names
Micropachy isn't even what it says on the tin, so no.
I mean
its micro
it also appears to have a thick head
so
small thick headed lizard
yeah that adds up
Technically, it's not micro. Micro-sized would be bacteria.
We don't know if it has a thick head because we haven't found a full skull.
And it's definitely not a lizard
So its name is a complete lie
Basilosaurus is by far worse
-King
Basilosaurus most likely wasn't engaging with politics
-lizard
Not a reptile
False, we actually have evidence regarding Basilosaurus's policy from taxation to war. Most of it is just one big tirade about Moeritherium and how its unfair that it can escape by walking
Actually you are false, Basilosaurus was actually very much against monarchies, and favored anarchy much more instead
I know I’m late to the convo
But I’m sorry, Nanuq is a meme
That thing should be banished to the shadowrealm
ACTUALLY I would love for kulindadromeus to be a vivarium animal lowkey
Pretty much every other Tyrannosauroid takes priority
Hey if Nano made it, Nanuq can
Nano at least has decent material beyond being a jawbone fragment
It’s technically already in-game if you spawn the Trex skeleton lower jaw piece
Hell that’s more than we actually have of Nanuq
Sorry, I could've sworn the name was on the image itself.
i sure hope you're joking
better than decent
literally a full skeleton 💪
I dont get the nanuq love when theres yuty
nanuq really did just ride off of pachyrhinosaurus's popularity
I looked it up
definitely would fit in the larger vivarium
We don’t even know if Nanuq was feathered lol
I would laugh if we find Nanuq skin impressions that show it was scaly
Yuty > Alio/Qianzhou > Albert/Gorgo/Daspleto > Guanlong > Drypto/Nano > Dilong > Tany > Nanuq for tyrannosauroidea
Am i missing any?
I mean, you're potentially missing Megaraptorans but that is dependant on where they fall on the Coelurosaurian tree
Fair, then Megaraptor/Maip jump straight up to second just behind Yuty imo
and Australovenator
I feel like it is part of a trio with those other 2 as potential choices
Oh yea, for some reason i thought he was kinda fragmentary but hes actually pretty good for a megaraptorid ofc
mhm
and like I have said before
he is quite literally the only good option Australia has for a Mesozoic Theropod
Thylacosmilus atrox
what a complete and utter bogus argument
I’m not sure what the etymology of an animal has of any relevance in a chat where we discuss potential additions to the game
Ichthyosaurus is not a fish or a lizard, does that count as a point against it?
yeah like what argument even is this
"Its name is a lie" You know that like 90% of the time people don't actually care about what a prehistoric animal's name Means and only really care about how cool is sounds, right?
As if people wouldn't want Basilosaurus in an aquatic dlc because "Its name doesn't make sense"
by that logic dinosaurs shouldn't be allowed because they're not actually lizards
literally
What is wrong with the name Basilosaurus?
Um actually 🤓, I think you mean lizard dolphin.
Honestly though, think I might just want this as the whole zoo:
icthys means fish ☝️ 🤓
Macrauchenia

It's both
what is the point you are making
it's hard to tell when you are trying to make a serious point vs when you are just joking around
you worded what you said before like it was an actual slight against said species choice
people were having fun with saying that the animal should be included because of its long name, I was just joining in
Carnivorous marsupials would be great, and I'd love to see more South American mammals.
oh
I don't know about that fact.
However, Thylacosmilus is definitely a mammal that I would like to see added to PK.
It's a Marsupialiform, so it's closer to being a true marsupial than a placental
Its close enough tbh, no need to get annoying about semantics
It's a good animal in any case, it's a question of which dig site.
Hmmm.
Epecuén Fm. has Argentavis, but that's an aviary animal.
Ituzaingo doesn't have anything that leaps out but that doesn't mean it's bad, there's still some alt potential like Huayqueriana as a Macrauchenia alt.
Or maybe a generalized Huayquerian based place like what Tokod is for Mammoth steppe.
I never said it was a placental
just that it isn't a marsupial and shouldn't be called one
they are metatherians
this isn't being annoying about semantics this is trying to correct outdated terminology
they have been called marsupials for years when they aren't and are a distinct lineage of metatherian mammals
Yeah I get it, but also, people who work with them call them marsupials colloquially cause its the closest word to easily describe them
What? Who does?
Also, that isnt the easiest word to describe them
maybe it is to laymen, but metatherian is literally as easy to say as marsupial
we aren't going around saying that calling pterosaurs dinosaurs is just semantics
Sparassodonts are an entire branch of the metatherian tree that has been lost forever and imo reducing them to just being another group of marsupials diminishes how distinct they were
Stem marsupials
doesn't mean they are marsupials
More of a marsupial than Simosuchus a croc
Talking about crocs and relatives
Can't wait to see the big lad
Yeah, Voay is going to be great
Recently got 3d scanned
Wonder, if devs will take smaller size into consideration now
Voay is lowkey not even the more interesting Osteolamine bwahaha
ahhhhhhh ok
True, because last I checked it wasn't one
I mean iirc deinosuchus is still absolutely massive for a croc
only like 1-2 meters shorter iirc
Then you checked wrong
Consistently an osteolamine unless you do the weird thing of ignoring molec work
isnt Voay like the sister genus to Crocodylus
Interesting osteolamine in the meantime
this is what wikipedia says but that could be wrong ig
yeah what pineapple posted
sister genus to crocodylus
Yeah, had it backwards, my bad, been getting not enough sleep
Was assumed Osteolam, found Croc by molec
Literally was on Hekkala's TetZooCon talk about the entire process
Thanks for the heads up
Only way voay is getting added is trough a RE dlc, and even then I feel like most people would prefer hanyusuchus anyway
also iirc a relationship to Aldabrachampsus has been proposed but not exactly how
Honestly I cant wait to see it in PK
I don't think anyone (worth taking seriously) would complain if Hanyusuchus or Voay got in over the other.
Apparently it was belly-dragging like gharials
Even then 10 people know about these animals I feel so its not that big of a issue
either one is good
although me personally for an RE croc Mekosuchus would be on top of both
probably as a vivarium tho
I think the problem with Mekosuchus is we don't know when it died out
Mekosuchians are weirdos that may be outside of at least the longirostrine crown
Quinkana is also not a terrible pick but tbh since it probably wasnt as terrestrial as mekosuchus was or is typically claimed, voay is above it for me
Meko is great but not sure if it counts as recently extinct
Estimates range from the last 3-1.7K years ago
At least to the devs eyes