#Community Species Suggestions
1 messages · Page 61 of 1
diprotodon probably
I mean it'd be a surprise
||aka i willingly ignored them cause i really really want nothosaurus ingame pretty please||
??
I was just going off of what was on the list
idk crazier stuff shares rigs
deinocheirus shares a rig with tyrannosaurus
what the hell
But Deinocherius is not an alt
I mean thats fair
they look pretty similar to me at least with the exception of the "horn" on zyg
which could be comparable to the horn difference between elasmotheriums/sinotherium ig
Eoraptor is right there
I missed it but Herrera isn't
thats the animal i was referencing with the killer missing animal
i mean
if we got a format like this for the dlc
Sure, I'm just making a suggesting for another Triassic/SA pack
it would be really hard to give the triassic justice like that
i may feel strongly in favor of Herrera, but some people really dont care
so much good shit in it
9/10 times ice age horses refer to E. ferus
Chinle is full of gold
I renovated your chart to make it a template for all to use, fred
Are we guessing how many species slots will get per DLC, or was there something official by devs?
We don't know how many we're getting
đđ
The devs have talked about making a recently extinct pack as one of the earliest DLCs (provided the game is successful enough) and one of the stretch goals of the kickstarter was a recently extinct expansion with ten animals. Though, ten seems unlikely.
I would guess 6 as the high estimate
I could realistically see 6 or 4
8 or 10 seems a bit unreasonable
I could also see 5 with one vivarium
yeah basically my estimate is anywhere from 4-7
with a varying degree of vivarium species
i could honestly see 6 or 7 standard animals, maybe 3-4 viv honestly depending on the frequency they'd decide, since they wouldn't be worried about features, just animals
It also depends how often they'd like to release DLC
I can imagine 10 if they were annual
Early Paleocene Denver had really interesting mammals
Could work in normal or vivarium
There's definitely good paleocene animals, the big issue is that it's hard to find much info on them and there's like one animal (Gastornis) that people actually know and care about
Mostly like early Triassic
They are not a subspecies
They diverged 2.5 million years ago
I mean both cat clades in game would also be scavengers. Hell, lions scavenge more than spotted hyena.
Also I would say they are an apex predator, not the apex predator. Even ignoring hominids, there were steppe lions, Homotherium, gray wolves and brown bears on the steppe.
Sure every meat eating animal is also a scavenger to some extent. I meant that Hyenas are kinda known for it.
I thought that there was consensus tho, that they were absolutely the apex predator of pleistocene Europe. Even with all the aforementioned animals in mind, but maybe I'm misremembering
No not really
Steppe Hyenas weren't scavengers any moreso than the other pleistocene carnivores we already have in game
Itâs just a stereotype
the hyenas that are true scavengers are those like Striped or Brown Hyenas which are specialized for it
those of the Crocuta genus are active and successful predators
All carnivores in a zoo are scavengers
They feed on dead animals killed by other animals (humans)
and this isn't even to say that they never hunt either, they just are specialist scavengers
Spotted Hyenas aren't like that though
Well I guess that pack hunting is still on the table?
I mean, yeah there's no reason to think that Steppe Hyenas weren't social hunters
but all the same, Spotted Hyenas do a lot of their hunting solitarily
They don't really need to cooperate to bring down most large prey
And both lions and Smilodon were also cooperative hunters
is that confirmed for Smilodon?
More or less
Probably not full lion prides but definitely more social than previously thought
Aight, I didnât think I would be making this but hereâs a list of hyenas I think would be cool to have in game; 1. Cave hyena, 2. Chasmaporthetes, 3. Pachycrocuta, 4. Dinocrocuta, 5. Thalassictis, 6. Lycyaena, 7. Ictitherium, 8. Adcrocuta.
Now, on the flip side, here is my list of felines: 1. Miracinonyx, 2. Giant cheetah, 3. Homotherium, 4. Machairodus, Meganthereon, 5. P. blytheae, 6. European Jaguar, 7. Eurasian puma, 8. Dinofelis, 9. Xenosmilus, 10. Proailurus, 11. Pseudailurus.
I realized a lot of the jaguars I wanted to add are unfortunately subspecies.
I had more expectations with my cat list but uh, I was slapped with some realizations.
Buddy, I have mews doe you
Homotherium is neither a feline nor a felid
No. đ I had one as a kid.
She was a calico. đ€©
Itâs ok.
I think I honestly just want a bunch of extinct cheetahs. đ
Huh, what is it then?
Yeah, um, that part I donât get since it literally says machairodonts are part of Felidae.
Yeah, just went back and checked, Felidae is Felid...
Nimravids arenât. They are closely related but they are in another family.
And theyâre false sabers.
Which, I didnât mention and would make another list for.
i was thinking somethin else then
-David Peters
Chasmaporthetes....
I have no clue why they call it a hunting or running hyena as common name listed on the Wiki... Like, bud, don't most hyenas do that???? JUST CALL IT THE ARCTIC HYENA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sounds way cooler anyways.
Since this is my brainrot channel, here is my next list, extinct cetaceans: 1. Kentriodon, 2. Basilosaurus, 3. Livyatan, 4. Dorudon, 5. Odobenocetops, 6. Pakicetus, 7. Ambulocetus, 8. Perucetus, 9. Ankylorhiza, 10. Squalodon, 11. Macrokentriodon, 12. Haborophocaena, 13. Kutchicetus, 14. Aetiocetus, 15. Cetotherium, 16. Zygophyseter, 17. Mystacodon, 18. Llanocetus, 19. Notocetus, 20. Extinct orcas, 21. Australodelphis, 22. Arktocara, 23. Goedertius, 24. Ninjadelphis, 25. Awadelphis, 26. Miophocaena, 27. Semirostrum, 28. Piscolithax, 29. Lomacetus, 30. Meherrinia, 31. Maiabalaena.
2 lists for the price of 1 today. My comprehensive vivarium suggestions. You know the drill for what's underlined and what's crossed out. Decided on a larger roster of 42 species with hopefully a well rounded cast of fan faves and newbies.
Aegirocassis
Alphadon
Anchiornis
Anomalocaris
Anurognathus
Archaeopteryx
Arthropleura
Brontoscorpio
Castrocaudia
Cephalaspis
Coelurosauravus
Confuciusornis
Cynognathus
Didelphodon
Diictodon
Dimorphodon
Drepanosaurus
Haikouicthys
Halszkaraptor
Hynerpeton
Icthyornis
Isotelus
Jeholopterus
Lystrosaurus
Meganeura
Megarachne
Microraptor
Mononykus
Necromantis
Notosuchus
Passenger Pigeon
Peltephilus
Peteinosaurus
Petrolacosaurus
Proburnetia
Rahonavis
Rhamphorhynchus
Shuvuuvia
Simosuchus
Thrinaxodon
Tiktaalik
Yi Qi
We love them long rosters around here.
I love how smooth that animation is.
I suppose, given how big it is
Wait, I already had Coty in my Synapsids list haha
imagine how cute baby Coty's will look
depends on the species but probably yeah
if we were to get coty I could almost guarentee it would be handcocki not romeri or bromeri
at least as the main
since its the big one
also if that was the case it would be the 2nd animal where the type species wasnt the one ingame, first being microraptor
(PK has M. gui, type is M.zhaoianus)
Ursus, panthera
ohhhhh yeah lmao
I would put them into a different category seeing as they are yknow
alive
but touche
Yeh
Honestly, all those Permian creatures would make for a sick indoor zoo if they were alive today.
Rhamphorhynchus is an exhibit sized flier
yeah it's the best choice for a non vivarium non pterodactyloid
Question: if we get the Daeodon, y'all think Archaeotherium would be an alt species?
I remember starting up a discussion regarding swine for PK
A few months ago or something
There is old concept art of Daeo so maybe still up for consideration on the mammal side of things (I hope it is). There are many cool entelodonts.
Pleistocene Podium: Dwarf Sicilian Elephant
There's so many pleistocene proboscideans that could comfortably make it into this game, without getting in each others way, however I feel like this apply for our next species the most.
Dwarf Sicilian Elephant stands out amongst its contemporaries, first and foremost by size. This makes it fantastic pick for zoo manager games and Zoo Tycoon seemed to pick up on that very early on.
Their size allows for you to care after elephants in your park, without having to construct yet another mega habitat. It also allows for more creativity when it comes to habitat design and barrier picking, when you don't have to worry about behemoths breaking out again.
They also refresh that stereotypical cold pleistocene atmosphere (which is still pretty cool tbh) coming from warm, humid Mediterranean, prompting new enviroment and flora to be added.
Now elephants aren't the most colorful animals, but looking at the art below, we can have alternatives with variations of hair, from moderately hairy (again, like gentlemen below) to almost complete hairlessness, like our modern elephants.
That would be it for this one. Until tomorrow đ
Art by Agustin Diaz.
Previous podium: #1360542295228944414 message
Funnily enough there some old stuff that slightly pointed towards p. Namadicus and p. Falconeri as alts
It's kidna old tho (like a year and a half) and It was never confirmed so don't think much about it
Old stuff, like from the devs, or fan speculation?
Kinda both
Doubt its possible anyway
Not only is falconeri the size of antiquus calf, but they are also built very differently
Falconeri is built like a cow
Well if it's at all on their minds it's cool to hear
I keep reading bits and pieces of bunch of different post EA plans, but all through secondary channels, so I can't check what's legit and what's not
Albertosaurus is a quite popular pick but I'm just gonna bring over Medena's take on it (unrelated to the game), because it deserves love
Looks unclean
I would prefer either alioramus or qianzhousuarus over other tyrannosaurids like alberta, gorgo, daspleto, lythro
didnt know medena did a alberto. neat
would love to see Dryptosaurus in the game
Aside from the ones in game, what major theropod groups are we missing (I know we talked quite a bit about the megaraptorans).
Ceratosaurs (Ceratosaurus, Carnotaurus, noasaurs)
Metricanthosaurs (Yang gang)
Therizinosaurs
DID SOMEONE SAY YANG GANG
Troodontids
Carnotaurus is coming
Birds
But it's not here yet
Personally, I want to see majungasaurus
Noasaurs too
I am so ready for theris.
mentioned them
We only need Masiaka but damm do we need Masiaka
Incorrect
Whoops
Limu + Elaphro
Emphasis on the need
Limu and elaphro are peak dlc
For the tiny dinos, I can imagine making like those kid sections where they can kinda pop their head into the enclosure through glass bubbles.
Dinosaurs smaller than Velociraptor would likely be classified as vivariums, but when I look at the larger vivariums, I think it would be possible to exhibit dinosaurs the size of Velociraptor.
Eh, if that's a major group, oh boy the coelurosaur subdivisions we gotta go through bwahaha
(FWIW, not saying that they aren't cool; c'mon mid-late Jurassic China pack)
Ok but at what taxon are we actually classifying all these theropods? Families, orders?
whichever you want
Those are ranks, and ranks are actually meaningless
At the end of the day, gotta find the compromise to make most people happy (and that includes the devs, and that involves workload and profitability)
Sometimes I hate how confusing it gets with all those terms we can use.
Makes me cross eyed. đ
Anyways, bringing it back to mammals, here is my entelodont wish list: 1. Daeodon, 2. Archaeotherium, 3. Entelodon, 4. Paraentelodon, 5. Cypretherium, 6. Brachyhyops, 7. Proentelodon.
I mean, they're not that useless.
So tell me why order coleoptera is both larger, more diverse and older than class mammalia? The ranks are useless because they are based on 18th century vibes, and they are just used by old farts when they are trying to disregard the importance of genetic data, or biodiversity, or any measurable part of biology
Daeodon already has a model, so it will probably be improved and come back later.
Still putting it in just in case. Reinforcement of it being my top pick for the group.
Beetles are vastly more diverse than mammals. You can still find use in "this is a beetle" and "this is a mammal"
Good, a member of Coleoptera and a member of Mammalia
Think I will make some lists for borophagines, nimravids, hyaenodons, and general extinct canids later.
but "order" or "class" has no use whatsoever
That's what the useless ranks are
Not the clades as a whole
oh
I hope that when Daeodon returns, Entelodon will be added as an alternative species.
I know I'm not going to change your mind, but pushing that onto literally everyone else here is exhausting
It is literally my job and my formation
Also, isn't it more exhausting to come and try to contradict something just because?
Honestly, donât care which species gets put in as alternate, as long as we have an alternate. I like having different genuses involved in the game to make diversity. I personally think it adds more variety in a zoo environment.
WRONG
Those are still more important and probably have more priority
Can we please stop arguing over priority of species? At the end of the day, all of these are speculations. Itâll be up to the devs which they want to take priority of. Youâre all allowed to have a preferred species that another person doesnât.
Alberto is literally as far away from Tyrannosaurus you can go without stopping being a tyrannosaurid
Thats the point - to argue over animals. No fun, if it was just here I suggest animal and everyone is wow
Also predator for both Dinosaur Park and Horseshoe Canyon
Conflict is overblown
I want to gush over animals
By that logic frontier wouldve added Hatzegopteryx, but they added Thanatosdrakon instead
Frontier is not this game's team tho
Well, all im saying is that I would prefer the more unique alioramids over all the other tyrannosaurs (alberto, daspleto, lythro, gorgo, nanuq)
Funnily enough Alio may be the closest to Tyranno out of those
Yeah, i just like them cuz theyre unique and pretty recently discovered so they deserve more spotlight imo
Also ive always found Alioramus to be a pretty cool name
I honestly want Alberto first, but Aliorams are IMO without a doubt a good third rep
(and Daspleto would be cool if we were to get a 4th tyrannosaurid, but I don't really care much for Teratophoneans and specially Nanuq)
Fair enough Alberto is definitely a classic that should get added
I feel a lil bad for Daspleto though, he always gets overshadowed even though hes pretty badass
Thanatosdrakon > Hatzeg
Imma pretend i didnt just read that
Girl what
Alverezsaurids
Thanatos is better known material wise (kinda), but hatze has its own unique appeal
Even if its 2 bones
There's more undescribed tho
excited to see it described
but i do favour thanatosdrakon, jwe kinda got me introduced
Without a doubt, I call the pterosaurs the wyverns of the real world.
Yeah, Iâd rather a more unique animal known from less material, then a better known animal thatâs basically the same as something else weâre getting
Well Thanatos is missing its entire skull iirc which is the most diagnostic part
So Hatzeg is still pretty decent compared to it
Arent just two azdharchid skulls out there?
Itâs pretty terrible
Still enough to be distinct from others from the definite material (holotype) and even more if you include the referred material
Probably Q. lawsoni and Zhejiangopterus then
Thatâs all they found?
Yes
Welcome to Azdarchids
(There is more undescribed specimens that might be Hateg as well)
Like Dracula
Its better then Arambourgiana though
mmm amazing head fragment
Never understood why it gained popularity
Tbf, that head fragment is enough to know it had a crazy wide skull
Itâs pretty cool
if this is all they found then how come it is always depicted with a huge skull?
or a crest
Its unfortunate we dont really have any clue what their crest if they had one looked like though
That little fragment in the skull is enough to tell you it had a wide skull compared to other azdarchids
Look at zheijano
ah
combo Azhdarchidae and Hateg
Do we have any info on those?
It had a skull as wide as T. rex
Some but not much afaik
I remember asking this here a while ago
While we have no evidence for a crest in hatze, every azharchid that was found with the crest preserved is from different lineages so its safe to assume it was a basal trait of the group
Something along those lines
Ah, underestimated how big Rhamp was
I think that's based off the largest specimen we have of it
All the others we found are a smaller (tho still too big for a vivarium imo)
A lot of the Solnhofen fossils have a very big taphonomic bias towards juvenile animals, itâs quite interesting
Mhm
We have so much material of rhamphorhynchus that we have more than 1 fossil of one being attacked by aspidorhynchus, the thought of them all being juveniles is pretty weird (tho dearc was basically the same size as the largest rhampho specimen)
List #6: exhibit-size marine animals. This is another comprehensive one, including invertebrates, fish, mammals, reptiles, etc. Since there are no marine animals in PK atm, nothing is underlined or crossed out. As usual, no alt genera included. This is a bigger one, with a clean cut roster size of 45 critters.
Archaeodobenus
Archelon
Attenborosaurus
Basilosaurus
Cameroceras
Caribbean Monk Seal
Cretoxyrhina
Cymbospondylus
Dakosaurus
Dolichorhynchops
Dorudon
Dunkleosteus
Elasmosaurus
Globidens
Gomphotaria
Halisaurus
Helicoprion
Henodus
Hybodus
Hyneria
Icthyosaurus
Jaekelopterus
Kronosaurus
Leedsichthys
Liopleurodon
Livyatan
Machimosaurus
Megalodon
Megalograptus
Metriorhynchus
Mosasaurus
Nothosaurus
Odobenocetops
Opthalmosaurus
Parapuzosia
Perucetus
Platecarpus
Plesiosaurus
Pliosaurus
Prognathodon
Pterygotus
Shonisaurus
Stellar's Sea Cow
Tylosaurus
Xiphactinus
Wheres my boy Onchopristis
Make your own list. I am sure you got a bunch of ones you can name which we didnât come up with.
Got plans for him
And several others that didn't make the cut
Or I just forgot lmao
I would add Stratodus and Mawsonia as well
i think that all big invertebrates will end up in aquariums rather than exhibits
the big ones would be good enough for all of them
Yeah, I just used exhibit as a catch-all term for their size
also hopefully we'll see a lot of small aquarium species
since making fishes and trilobites would be really easy even compared to vivarium animals
Also super obscure and unknown fish but pretty cool and would be nice filler imo Megalampris
Agreed
Duly noted
regardless the aquatic expansion will be massive
If free swimming animals can be done I dont see why eurypterids couldnt be among them
i don't think devs want to make a full animation/behaviour set for invertebrates
Why not?
too complex to animate
like I get it for stuff like Arthropleura
oh also ontogeny would be a mess
but eurypterids arent that complicated
ontogeny alone would sent them to the vivarium prison
it's doable
i kinda thought about it too
in my list
but just make their larval stage smaller versions of the adults instead of something more elaborate
I think the Megaquarium route would make more sense and mesh well with the current breeding system
and it's not like devs are following this thread seriously, isn't it?
I bet not. Maybe here and there.
i saw nano post once but that's it
Probably not, this is all wishful thinking lol
at the very best they took a glance at the community poll
I highly doubt theyre actively looking for species suggestions at this point in time especially
If I were a dev, I probably would look at this thread just for fun and maybe sketch out some fun concepts but realistically when you know how much work you already have has to be developed, you know itâs best not to dwell too long here.
especially considering they already outlined the post-release support schedule for the next 1 or 2 years after
Yeah, theyâve most likely already planned out all or most species and possibilities for the foreseeable future
fuck off king dedede
I need to get used to the fact that "Exhibit animals" in this game doesn't mean the same thing in means in Planet Zoo
Youâll prob get more used to it when they actually release U16, for now its still just pics and words on a screen afterall
Its actually related to Opah not Mola
Okay but it gives mola mola vibes
You know what? I really love just the fact we have many giant counterparts of modern species.
Yea, except for spiders
And whales given that the blue whale is the largest
No giant colugo on sight
Let's keep it that way
Giant venomous arachnids just sound like a human heart attack waiting to happen.
Anyways, canât wait for aquatics and even making multi species aquariums with all those cool fish.
We just gotta find em, surely they existed with how long spiders have been around
I bet they do. Just fossilization.
We know how finicky that is.
Or we are just that unlucky that we just so happen to be living with the largest spiders in history
I would love to make an entire aquarium exhibit dedicated to the Spinosaurus fishy habitat.
So these guys?
Ye. Minus Spino.
Although, maybe I could make a thing that somehow makes it look like Spino is in the habitat but not actually thereâŠ.
Combining enclosures but notâŠ
Getting Onchopristus and Mawsonia/Axelrodicthys would be amazing
Would play around with that if we ever got it.
It depends on how they implement aquatics, i see three options
- Like zt2 with giant aquariums
- Lagoons like jwe
- Sculpting out the terrain and filling it with water manually
I personally suspect theyâll probably work something like a hybrid between the zt2 tanks and JWE lagoons
I wouldnât mind having options on how they implement it. But honestly, whatever suits the devs best.
It would be cool making an aquarium through modular building and then having a game recognition system that allows for it.
But only if that is something they are willing to put the time in for and want to do so.
That does seem very complicated and unprecedented (i think)
Exactly.
Though pk were the first and still only to do the seamless ontogeny
And I would give them the money for that shit again.
I canât believe they did it but they did. And it paid off. I am SO proud of them for that.
It still surprises me how this small development team is implementing these huge innovative systems
Imagine how that must feel even more to be the one to pull it off. The champagne must have been flowing in the office that day.
Thatâs why if they did something like what I described, I wouldnât be surprised. I believe they would find a way.
Out of all the animals discovered in 2025 so far, which 3 would you add to pk?
New taxa of fossil archosaurs of every kind were described during the year 2025 (or scheduled to), and other studies related to the paleontology of archosaurs were published that year.
New taxa of fossil mammals of every kind are scheduled to be described during the year 2025, along with other significant discoveries and events related to paleontology of mammals that are scheduled to occur that year.
Fossil reptile research published in 2025 includes new taxa that were described that year, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to reptile paleontology.
yes
jfc
I think Protoceras celer and Paracrax gigantea/Bathornis geographicus would nice additions.
Protoceras's males had pair of crested horns over the nasal area, two on the back of the skull, and third one set just in front of the eyes. The females meanwhile only had the back pair, which were shorter than the males. They would have stood a meter in height and also had mouse deer like fangs. This would make a great early starting mammal alongside an early horse and Lagomeryx.
Both Paracrax and Bathornis are large flightless birds (over 2 meters in height) that were macropredators in their environment. The former is said to prefered more aird ecosystems compared to the latter. After a terror bird and Gastronis, I think they would the next best choice for a large flightless non-recently extinct theropod.
All these also come from the White River formation so they would nice additions alongside the must haves of Daeodon, Hyaenodon, Megacerops and Meso/Miohippus.
great picks
I personally would prefer Synethoceras or Syndoceras over Protoceras, but a great pick reguardless
I've seen some people say that Paracrax and Bathornis have been misinterpreted somehow and werent that big but IDK enough to say for sure
I just need more pronghorn type species in general.
I don't know the answer myself, but this was a counterpoint on a different thread.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Paleontology/comments/1iutzja/comment/me4dgn5/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
I'm not sold on the animal myself, I was just trying to find some decent additions for White River and it looked unique, but as usual, finding any information on cenozoics is hard.
I am pushing for Protoceras.
You would think it's easier since it's a mammal and then get hit with the opposite reality.
i see a gator
It's one of the earliest species of the genera.
List #7: Dinosaurs. This is one I've been putting off because I wanted to give all the other guys a fair shot. This is the penultimate list in my little series, with a lot of underlined and crossed out species. For those who are new and wonder why I didn't list certain dinos, I'm not including alt genera. This is my hardest list since there are so many dinos I love that would make the initial cut. But I gotta keep these rosters to a reasonable number. Here, I settled on 50.
But I did say penultimate, soooooo..................
Acrocanthosaurus
Albertosaurus
Allosaurus
Ankylosaurus
Apatosaurus
Argentinosaurus
Baryonyx
Brachiosaurus
Camarasaurus
Camptosaurus
Carcharodontosaurus
Carnotaurus
Centrosaurus
Ceratosaurus
Coelophysis
Deinocheirus
Diplodocus
Dryosaurus
Edmontonia
Edmontosaurus
Eoraptor
Gallimimus
Gigantoraptor
Guanlong
Herrerasaurus
Iguanodon
Lambeosaurus
Leaellynasaura
Muttaburrasarus
Nasutoceratops
Ouranosaurus
Oviraptor
Pachycephalosaurus
Pachyrhinosaurus
Parasaurolophus
Plateosaurus
Protoceratops
Psittacosaurus
Scelidosaurus
Spinosaurus
Stegosaurus
Styracosaurus
Tenontosaurus
Therizinosaurus
Thescelosaurus
Torvosaurus
Triceratops
Tyrannosaurus
Utahraptor
Velociraptor
White River would be such a peak "Safari" formation (stuff like Tokod, HC, Morrison etc)
Agreed (Totally not because I'm SD Mines alumni and I spent 4 years next to White River lmao)
You have the wrong k(c)entrosaurus on this list
The other one will be added next list
List #8: The "Finale" list. This is the final list in my little series. It consists of extinct taxa that were runners up for my previous lists, or those I just forgot because I'm a dum dum. This is another big one, with 60 taxa (not counting alt genera). Dinos, birds, marine animals, vivarium animals, reptiles, amphibians, weird paleozoic guys, etc.
And with this, my little list miniseries is coming to an end.
Aetosaurus
Amargasaurus
Archaeoindris
Arsinoitherium
Australovenator
Beelzebufo
Chasmosaurus
Cryolophosaurus
Dacentrurus
Deinonychus
Diplocaulus
Eryops
Eurohippus
Falkland Islands Wolf
Giganotosaurus
Glacialisaurus
Hallucigenia
Homalocephale
Homotherium
KauaÊ»i Ê»ĆÊ»Ć
Kentrosaurus
Leptictidium
Lythronax
Madtsoia
Magyarosaurus
Maiasaura
Majungasaurus
Mawsonia
Megalampris
Merycoidodon
Mesosaurus
Metridiochoerus
Miracinonyx
Monolophosaurus
Nanuqsaurus
Nimravus
Nothronychus
Olorotitan
Onchopristis
Opabinia
Ornithomimus
Pakicetus
Platybelodon
Prenocephale
Pterodactylus
Pulmonoscorpius
Pygmy Mammoth
Sauropelta
Saurosuchus
Simbakubwa
Stenonychosaurus
Stratodus
Synthetoceras
Teleoceras
Titanomyrma
Tsintaosaurus
Tullimonstrum
Yangchuanosaurus
Yutyrannus
Zalmoxes
Now for Phase 2: Organizing all these lists into more digestable DLC packs
Is this a wishlist?
Pleistocene Podium: Glyptodon
I believe I don't have to spend much words on this one.
It's one of the pleistocene staples and well established in pop culture and paleocommunity. Very unique animal, coming from very diverse order of mammals.
Picking them over Doedicurus was an arbitrary, subjective choice, and either would be more than welcome in game.
For alternative variant we could have Glyptotherium, for that North America coverage. Maybe that range that could be covered with those two variants is an advantage Glyptodon would have against Doedicurus. Makes it a more flexible pick for different kinds of zoo sections.
(In before people tell me that they're nothing alike and wouldn't work as alternatives)
Also I don't know how much backing has the theory that Glyptodons could've had trunks, but I think it would be fun to see model variations (like Elasmotherium) with and without. Or make one species have it and other not. Idk.
That would be it for this one. Until tomorrow đ
Art by LADAlbarran2001.
Previous Podium: #1360542295228944414 message
Trunked variant in Ice Age Giants doc
i have a hunch glyptodon may be in full release or shortly after
bawitius and concavotectum would be cool too
I think Bananogmius is prob better than Concavovectum
Sort of
Maybe an alt genus to Doedicurus?
Which glyp do yâall think would suffice as an alt? For whichever species that is main.
For which main?
Doedicurus and Glyptodon.
Like, take those as the main genus for the first two/three skins. What would their alts be?
There are rumors that Doedicurus will be coming in Update 19, but considering the number of herbivore slots, I hope Glyptodon will come along too.
holy shit there are rumors? 
doedicurus has no good alts
theres one from the miocene that could work but its not that interesting if Im being honest
forgot the name
Yes
but these are just rumors and the animals that will be added may differ...
I see there is one sister genus; Eleutherocercus.
yeah that one
In some cases, Update 16's animal predictions turned out to be very different from reality.
As I mentioned above, I believe Glyptotherium would be a good alt for Glyptodon. Not many visual differences necessarily (Therium was a bit smaller I believe), but they do cover different areas, with Glyptotherium stretching to NA
Pls don't tell me that those are the famed "leaks"...there could be anything in those purple spots đ„
honestly a good alt, its miocene, smaller and has different environmental requirements
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/408388800201621504/1424490924356014150/image.png?ex=68ee074e&is=68ecb5ce&hm=5d9b9af6fead38b52ec5a5f2916ea94a0880a2dddcdcc157a906ab0597617392 a bit of a shame this is the most decent reconstruction of it oof
it lived with thylacosmilus as well, its from a neat formation
goddamn he has chops for hair
They just vibing.
thats a common thing put on glyptodonts for some reason

First I ever heard of it now. Went to the Wiki for Doedic and went to the branch offs. Glad I found it. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this!
Time for someone to comission a new reconstruction
idk who but I don't got the cash
no, but since they'd share rigs it would be fairly easy to make
glyptodon cant be made an alt from doedicurus lol
that's what i meant
One of the best covers in Glee tbh
completely different scute configuration, would need a completely separate sculpt
Would make a good cereal bowl
it's still accurate, the roadmap icons fit pretty much perfectly
only thing different is that they reworked the vivarium mechanics and managed to squeeze in half a dozen new animals
(and i'm confident we're gonna see other minis on release)
Anywho, if we got Doedic and Glypto as separate glyptodont species, that would be awesome and then have two alt genuses but hey, I am fine with whatever the devs would want.
I'd be down for Leptictidium
imo it could fit alongside diictodon and peltephilus
Agreed
Has anyone talked about Indohyus? Cuz I think that would be a cute addition too.
A good, varied cast of mini mammals
if we get 4 new vivariums in 1.0 it could probably be those three plus either an insectivore or a herbivore dino depending on what diet thy choose for peltephilus
Honestly, more than half these mammals sound like something I would want to cuddle.
While I know these arenât minis, I would def want to add the giant hamster from S. America and rabbit from Menorca.
Lesothosaurus?
Update 16 will add a semi-aquatic mammal, which could be the Indohyus.
However, there are many possibilities, so it will remain a mystery until the trailer is released.
Love those red panda dinos.
Leptictidium is by far my most wanted vivarium animal discounting serpentine critters
The creature
Itâs so cute. Love the bebes.
That trailer about to be so epic. I am SO ready.
At this point I don't think it's Indohyus
As much as I'd like it to be
I think its either Castorocauda or Didelphodon
I lean towards Castorocauda given that it's a bit more unique looking
I think that the vivs might open the door to the Palaeozoic too.
Good chance
Well we are getting Tiktaalik with the next update
True
I think with fuzzy therapsids and the small mammals of the Mesozoic, weâre gonna get a lot of fun new additions.
Make it an ice cream bowl and then itâs a party
True, wasnât remembering at that moment. Just zoned in on the idea of something like Thrinaxodon and such.
I do kind of wish we got a couple more skins for vivariums but it is what it is
We're almost certainly getting Thrinaxodon, I'd bet money on it
I can't wait meet animals.
We have seen Compy in action
Lystrosaurus
That's not going to come with U16
Puntable
Would glyptodon and glyptotherium make sense as alts in theory
Yes they are extremely similar
Glyptotherium is smaller and has a more oval shell compared to glyptodon, but the scutes are near identical and the same goes to their facial anatomy
I really hope spinosaurus isnât the only species in its family that we get
Baryonyx is like 90% confirmed
I remembered wrong, it is indeed fully confirmed. Disregard previous statement.
thanks for the correction!
Not really a species request but we can get the burrow fossils of the Great Plains of the Miocene added as a decoration
What is it with the Miocene and having strange ichnofossils
Theres this and that spanish mega arthropod
It's so cool. I don't know if this is a combo of two separate molds but damn, this would be a sweet find.
Oh fuck yeah Devils Spiral
Shame the vivariums are too shallow
For now
Kinda hope for Pampatherium as a good third
Maybe, it is deeper than I remember
make glyptodon the edgier one with a spiked collar 
I think it's deeper in the back of the terrestrial but the front is not, perspective is really messing things up for me
Glyptodon in its emo era.
Giwtwm
The 3 smaller ones seem to be 1 meter deep, while the largest one looks like 2 meters deep
With this big amount of water I am starting to think semi aquatic mammal is going to be that tiny seal
What tiny seal?
Praepusa?
Or some sort of early pinniped. Would match Mau word about us not being able to ever guess it
I feel like that was done in a joking manner.
Personally, I think Castorocauda is still the safest bet.
True. Mau is lying a lot
It's Deinonychus coming in u17 guys
I know deinonychus is reference to that reddit discussion
they adding nanotyrannus to u17 as reference to jfc (combat related)
No mau literally misspoke yesterday morning
I think the remaining U16 animals are at this point:
Castorocauda lutrasimilis - it's a semi-aquatic mammaliform and rather unique looking and kind of important
Thrinaxodon liorhinus - as the fuzzy triassic critter because it's one of the better known (and studied) cynodonts and a good choice for using those burrows.
Mononykus olecranus - thanks to the leak that the dinosaur ate insects and this is the best known of the dino anteaters
Tianyulong confuciusi - because it is a funky dinosaur being both a hetrodontosaur (which are weirdos thanks their teeth) as well as the only one from that group with evidence of fuzz
Hell if I know what the arboreal lizard is
Couple good options
My money would be on Drepeno
The diet is throwing me off because I'm struggling to think of a single notable lizardlike animal that ate meat
and lived in trees
Got the right animal this time - are the H and N in the right spots? Don't care
Megalancosaurus maybe?
Eh. There was question about why there is no stegosaurus in game despite presence in old trailer with Nano answer in comments and some people though that it is coming alongside deinonychus or utah in U17
I cant believe suminia still holding up as my main option till now
But then again mau said yesterday not to put too much stock in diets
while true, I doubt they putting a carnivore diet to something that mainly ate insects
Contextually the frugi in 17
Honestly, I'm leaning towards a glider at this point.
because visually that would be the most interesting and viewable without having to zoom in as much
The evidence mountsâŠ
Megalanco ate smaller lizards as well
Well, "lizards"
Reptiles that looked like squamated
would make sense in a way considering all other arboreals can glide or fly, so its easier to set up
isnt that one like drepano as well
Hm. But, if there is single tree in smallest vivarium and we assume lizard is going to use it then it really might be just drepano
Any of these or their relatives like Weigeltisaurus or Kuehneosaurus seem like the best bet
You could still have them glide to the ground around the tree, which would still be visually interesting.
cant find much on it eating smaller lizards
Similar, but don't think it had the digging claw
Also smaller
Something got me thinking it might be the case
Because, if animals are not using looped animation cycle it might be hard to animate arboreal animal to climb tree
While for gliding species it is just movement from point A on one tree to point B on another
I know, but I also don't think they would lie about it either; it's one thing to say this is thing didn't just eat meat, it's another thing to list meat as a diet when it didn't do so
Microraptor
Maybe, though we do see it now
Was micro capable of powered flight? Or just gliding?
I know last log mention climbing, but this is interesting case, because it would mean climbing animations for animals
That arent just part of one long loop
It also really depends on tree, because thin and unusual sized branches would make it harder compared to something PZ offers
I remember once making a customized habitat for both the minis and realized that I put the wrong species in each. Then I had to sell and replace with the correct species.
Fact checked true
i hope the other dino is halskzaraptor so at least we have 3 amphibious minis
something like epidermipteryx and venetoraptor could fit
All three of those are dinosaurs. Why use the term "lizard" instead of dinosaur for the arboreal animal for the hint? And I think the dinos are going to be Tianyulong and Mononykus.
nuh uh, veneto is lagerpetidae
even then i trust in halskzaraptor and suminia supremacy
Nobu Tamura really went for it
I would in fact
Consider that funky
Look at those hands
Raccoon looking ass
Considering the fact that semi-aquatic mammal is 99% the piscivore, I would say Haskza chances are low
What if it smells like a honey badger.
Arboreal lizard is eoscansor so we fill in our carboniferous rep too
(Everyone cheered)
unlikely but the way I would cry tears of joy
seals are so whimsical
Prehistoric seals aren't a want. They're a NEED.
Plesitocene Podium: Gigantophitecus
Huge primates and dinosaurs go hand in hand since earliest iterations of King Kong, why miss out?
On a more serious note, this ape is most iconic Chinese pleistocene animal by far, would be first and potentially only primate in game, while definitely being only ape, which would be new and unique for roster.
Connection to Yeti myth made it a star in popular media. Gigantopithecus already showed up in ZT2, both Wildlife Park games and Ice Age movies.
Even tho it's present widely in popular media, there are still speculative angles to be explored by modeling and animating them. Like coat variations, where along the regular Orangutan-esque look, designers could delve into alternative and original colors and patterns.
Or animators could finally do it justice in that department, since in many interpretations Gigantophitecus was made bipedal and more akin to Yeti/Bigfoot, we could finally have realistic depiction in major paleo game.
Anyway I always loved designing monkey/ape habitats in zoo games, so fingers crossed I'll get to do it in this game sooner rather than later.
That would be it for this one. Until tomorrow đ
Art by Agustin Diaz.
Previous podium: #1360542295228944414 message
Honestly one of my highest rated wants for the mammal roster but I also legit hope we get a bunch of ape species. Thereâs plenty of nice choices from the times they were in Europe.
Although, I could make an entire primate list so I might just do that.
i too want orangutang to be added to Pee Kay
i will only accept its addition if its throws its shit at the guests
thats true addition right there
Guest casualties update, we will be there
True, seems that PZ struggled with their Orangutans, even after some tweaks to animations
The face animations - monkeys and derivatives are incredibly expressive
Oh yeah, didn't even think about that part
And if itâs either a pirate or voiced by Christopher Walken
Frontier didnt struggle
They just put orangutan on gorilla rig
Lmao
I feel like calling it the most iconic pleistocene animal from China is a stretch
Palaeoloxodon is Right There
also as far as other primates go, there are also subfossil lemurs which have decent chances of getting added
in a perfect world I would want both Gigantopithecus and Archaeoindris
Idk I feel like Gigantophitecus is head and shoulders above every other Chinese pleistocene animal when it comes to recognition, even Paleoloxodon. There are other primates out there, and many that I would love to see, but realistically speaking, and seeing other similar games, Giganto has the best shot
They reused many other rigs with greater success, where you couldn't even tell, but they were either lazier with Orangutan or they really found their animations hard to pull off
And then there's also the fur issue
I think vivariums can handle even the bigger species Choristodera
Whatever it takes to get Champsosaurus
one day ... one day
Issue i see with apes like Gigantopithecus is that it would require brachiation which i highly doubt the devs would add
Pretty sure an adult Gigantopithecus was more-or-less too heavy for that.
Ok but assuming those giant sizes, would they even be able to???
Idk tbh, i just kinda assumed cuz its an orangutan
Archaeoindris probably gonna need it tho
Considering it was quite similar to its arboreal cousins
They're about as related to orangs as gorillas are to chimpanzees.
Smaller monkeys etc could possibly go in the vivariums (large)
I thought they were very closely related, based solely on the jaw on teeth found
And even so, maybe the babies and juvies still didnât really do that. I mean, since we never really found skeletons (damn those porcupines) maybe there was certain robustness too that wouldnât have supported that lifestyle at any point.
They are in the sense that they both belong in Ponginae, but that's pretty much it.
Gg phone
Both Pongines, different tribes - Pongo in Pongini, and Gigantopithecus in Sivapithecini
The porcupines actually brought them to the caves
Humans probably ground them up before the modern period
Paradolichopithecus is probably my most wanted prehistoric monkey
Time to go back in time but then, at that point, I would just drag a Gigantopithecus out of the past and just drop it in North America to get the Bigfoots into HD quality.
Actually, imagine tho if there was a Himalayan variant and it grew white fur and so we could have a yeti version?
The split of Pongine tribes is far deeper than that of Hominine tribes as well; Giganto and orangutans had been separate things for almost as long as they had split from the African apes... goddammit Wikipedia stop removing cladograms
Imagine a science based wiki site and specifically for biology.
Why
Wikipedia used to be great in bio in general and phylogenetics in particular, this is a recent development
I did a master's thesis on phylogenetics teaching back in 2016 and Wikipedia being at the forefront with it was a conclussion my director throughly agreed with
Its weird how sometimes I find a lot more info on wikipedia on my native language
Yeah it being a list was very annoying
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hominoidea_lineage.svg At least it hasn't been deleted
G. blacki Waa that recent compared to the rest of the genus? Wild
BASED and REAL
I am back and here to humbly suggest Viatkogorgon
Pleistocene Podium: Megalonyx and Mylodon
I'm now aware that Megatherium is most likely coming to our game. I wouldn't be surprised if along with it we see Eremotherium as an alt that covers bit of North American range (and maybe offers hairless variant?). That would leave us with two biggest sloths species, but what about their smaller cousins?
When I talked about Dwarf Elephant, I already expressed love for the idea of having smaller alternatives for usually large animals. It enables flexibility in designing zoos, where we don't have to miss out on certain types of animals even if we donât want to or don't have space for yet another mega habitat. Same goes for ground sloths.
Now I picked Megalonyx and Mylodon as variants to each other to fill this niche.
Specific species aren't as important to me, but if they do Megalonyx, I'm safely assuming it will be Jeffersoni. That one was spread out all over N. America (From Alaska to Mexico). Not to mention that one DNA research that found hints of presence in Siberia (whatever came of that?). That range covers many biomes and offers fantastic utility for all kinds of zoo sections. Not to that different climates it inhabited could give us model variations when it comes to lentgh of fur.
A species of Mylodon would be my alt. variant of choice. It would cover small sloth niche, this time for South America. I specifically prefer M. Darwinii because we seem to know that one the best: ideas of omnivorous diet, understanding of knuckle locomotion, intact skin, fur, nails and excrement.
That would be it for this one. Until tomorrow đ
Art by Bzaiken.
Previous podium: #1360542295228944414 message
Now the only question that I have for people who know this things better: Are Megalonyx and Mylodon viable for alt variants? If not would you find inclusion of both individualy excessive?
No
Both are to different to be alts
i love mylodon đ
They are extremely different animals anatomically speaking for them to be alts
Oh wow, would've fooled me, but it just goes to show how out of depth I am. But then wouldn't they fulfill too similar of a niche to be included separately? I know I wouldn't mind
possibly
they were quite different tho
also have the advantage of 2 seperate continents
but they would both definitely fill medium sized ground sloth yeah
I would personally prefer Megalonyx of the two since I would say people know about it better, it also has more of a history in paleontology which is always nice
and a really large and abnormal range for ground slothes, all teh way up to alaska
about this, mylodon is closer to two toed slothes than it is to megalonyx
and megalonyx is closer to three toed sloth than it is to mylodon or two toed slothes
cool that two of the same lineage converged to such a degree
Yeah, that is pretty cool. Idk why, I thought all ground sloths were closer to two Toed. Maybe because of skulls
perhaps
We learned that relatively recently
Tree sloths evolved twice, and so did giant ground sloths
Caribbean island ground sloths are also VERY distant to living sloths
indeed
ironic the most basal ones survived the longest except for the tree ones
also technically tree slothes may have converged more than twice, since iirc a few of the smaller carribean slothes likely had arboreal habits
Tree sloths are basal to Caribbean sloths, it goes both ways
although they had a much more superficial resemblance to typical ground slothes
Neocnus\
pretty good pick for a mini imo
(I believe this is technically parallel rather than convergent evolution ttbt, starting and ending points are both similar, but independant)
But that's just technicallites
actually ground slothes are pretty easy to subdivide in terms of roster IMO
basically XL, L, M, S
XL being something like Megatherium and S being a vivarium sized or slightly larger
my picks would be the following for those 4
Megatherium and Mylodon would be quite neat to have both ngl
Im gonna be honest I have very little knowledge of ground sloth evolution
XL: Megatherium (duh)
L: Megalonyx
M: Nothrotheriops or Megalocnus (either one, both are goated)
S: Neocnus
my personal picks
Last I heard one of their groups was actually made in north america before the great biotic interchange?
iirc theres a few extinct species in the living genera
Those could be fun as vivs then
Thalassocnus is likely a nothrotheriid
ye, megalonyx and freinds arrived in north america several million years before they connected
I entirely forgot about Thalassocnus lol
Very strange
The 2 living groups of sloths are also quite distinct anyway
AD, do they get different common names over there? I believe you are on native range of both?
But, yeah, sloths have potential for multiple animals and for those to feel different
They are usually just called pereza or peresozo
At the end of the day, I'd have to agree with mister, that Megalonyx would be preferable if we were made to choose between two medium species, it would suck to miss out on Mylodon tho
I aint aware of other names, but making a list would be ungodly tedious possibly
Ah, same as here then, thanks!
(Spain tends to go with quite clinical common names for LatAm fauna)
And yeah im in the native range of both genera
I have seen three toeds in the wild in 3 occasions
Heh, as somebody in a temperate area, that's awesome!
South America is general has peak fauna
Only thing i'd miss would be Quebrantahuesos (i really like them ok) and Lynxes
Boneshatterer is a metal name for the bearded vulture I swear
And the metal name really fits and makes sense for the animal if only paleontologists learned from that
I believe I've seen gennets and perhaps a mongoose, but those are old introductions most likely; bunch of iberian endemisms, but the larger ones are goats anyway
Hell, its binomial is just "bearded eagle-vulture"
Anyway, sloths and armadillos have plenty of potential additions, but I don't think anteaters have much to offer?
Talking about beardied good devs give Argent/Terator a bearded skin i beg you đ
To be honest I personally never heard of any extinct anteaters
I think there's a pleistocene species which ig for normal kingdom but yeah not much to scratch there
It's weird how they missed out on gigantic specimens, perhaps due to diet?
Gonna see if there's any RE
They are quite specialized
The giant anteater is after all a tamandua that became terrestrial, and it isn't much larger
Yeah, the one thing is a larger ground silky anteater
Anteaters by definition have to have existed for as long as sloths, but, hyperspecialists
Pilosa being covered by sloths is fair enough
I've been looking through Vermilingua and It doesn't seem like, most interesting thing i found was Palaeomyrmidon which is a Terrestrial pygmy sloth
Only a skull from Argentina
From the pliocene
Superficially it appears to just be a tamandua so idk
Seems that sloths covered most niches out of all xenathrans, anteaters missed out on giant size and armadillos don't have tree climbing species, while sloths have both and then some
Sloths were also the only ones going semiaquatic
Funny how the woolly armadillo is still extant
There is neotamandua from the miocene
Which is basically just a regular tamandua
But yeah, anteaters are both specialists AND conservative, if it works it works
Dont have to change much if it works
Peltephilus is unironically an interesting choice
Now if something would be a worthy alt would be megatherium species
Lots of andean species
Parents gave up on naming after the first child
Could use boreal biome and be hella fluffy
"Myrmecophaga" literally means "ant eater" fwiw
While the species we all know, americanum, remains the standard grassland one everyone knows
Megatherium could have a really fun biome distribution yeah
Ever since the leak, even if it was misinterpreted im hoping we get peltephilus for vivaria
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/408388800201621504/1425298934682751098/image.png?ex=68f04f12&is=68eefd92&hm=4981bff71f26964dee47bb6a522e620e700d796887c0ced81a3fa0dc1b50fe8c& all the guys on the left lived in the andean region
Grassland, boreal, temperate and tropical, maybe coastal too?
Scrubland instead of coastal
Peltephilus and Ceratogaulus are IMO awesome vivarium choices
Oh yeah scrub
Indeed, it seems like cenozoic vivaria are gonna be very lacking
These would be great
Ceratogaulus my GOAT
If we don't get Meko as a viv i will be depressed
It's the perfect out of place Cenozoic viv
Based on the descriptions, the only real cenozoic possibility currently is the semi aquatic mammal. So not much
Honestly there aren't that many real posibilities for the semi to be cenozoic
If you're talking only about the stuff coming in U16 yes
A small prehistoric beaver like Paleocastor, the sea mink are the only things to come to mind
Either that or Obdurodon
I do hope they come with hidden surprise vivaria as well
But 90% of the chances are taken by didelphodon/castorocauda
Oh yea nearly forgot about him
Obdurodon would be peak as hell
Paleocastor is terrestrial
Tbh Both i find very unlike but i think it's more likely the lizard is a ceno
The arboreal lizard?
There's not much there either;
Tho this relies on the assumption the lizard is indeed a squamate which most probably It isn't
I'd assume not
Yes, and yes i know it's almost surely either one of the gliders or drepano
I mean at this point, I think the lizard is a glider
The gliders really have the best support
Makes more sense than the rest from in terms of how it would look in game
Most Drepanosauromorphs are incredibly small, so that's a tough thing to do well
If It were indeed a squamate It would probably be either Gigarcanum or a snake since there aren't many arboreal squamates to choose from really
I mean tbh i would be fine with drepano itself only
Gigarcanum would be RE
RE species don't need to come in a RE dlc
My bad, i meant Steneofiber
Otherwise we aren't getting things like Steller's or Baiji ever
Or Haasts for that matter
Aside from the small exceptions, I don't see why they would do RE additions outside of a specialised DLC, especially during EA
Yes, but those that can't be included because of locomotion problems. I find that different than the gecko.
I imagine the lizard will be small enough to fit in the 4x4 vivarium
Any of those candidates would fit in a 4x4
Imagine the largest vivarium then with 50 lizards though
Unless the snake is titano which It lets be real as funny as It would be It isn't
Except something like Saniwa
Mau's already said it's not
Foureyes
Honestly i wouldn't mind something like Lapitiguana, some good Oceania rep and amazing filler.
Wait could It be Palaeosaniwa?
That would fit very well and add the first HC mini
Idk that's kinda big, isn't it
Maybe, the issue is I don't know much about how they lived
Snout-vent is almost a metre
It's around large Tiktaalik size so idk
Yeah it's at that interesting spot
But it's not the lizard we're getting guaranteed
Mekosuchus is goated choice, top of the list of my vivarium wishes
Oh ik but unlike any Ceno one i do think It has a real if small chance of being the u16 animal
New Caledonia in general is just too peak
Does any remember when the leak about one of the mini dinos being an insectivore occurred
I want to track it down to the source
If it behaved akin to it's modern relatives, it's a burrower
I mean i'd assume the burrows would be large enough
We're getting an arboreal lizard
Y'know, in the trees
Nvm then
Mau did say at one point we'd get a Permian animal for EA.... hmmm, maybe Coelurosauravus or Weigeltisaurus
Did he?
Yeah
Don't think Suminia counts as a lizard
I mean it could simply mean lizard like
Yeah but like i wouldn't call Suminia lizard like
Castorocauda isn't technically a mammal
This means we're getting Mark Zuckerberg
Mark Zuckerberg isn't a lizard, he's an invertebrate
He's a lizard like mollusk
I remember hearing about a North American red panda before. And also, I think if we had some of the small American primates from the Eocene, that would be cool.
hope torosaurus comes one day
Notharctus tenebrosus is a must have
I know that most red pandas here in North America are kept outdoors so I donât know if this one would need a vivarium but could be a nice choice anyways.
Wild restoration
Yeah, it is a bit exaggerated here , but it has more upright stance than trik
Wdym
I mean, it's different that tirk
No theyâre not
Thereâs no known difference in the body of Triceratops and Torosaurus
They're large ceratopsids, the only difference is in the skulls really
Tbh did anyone look at torosaurus post cranial material seriously
Or any other ceratopsian for that matter
Because the post crania isn't studied in basically any large ceratopsian
And we only have like one for Torosaurus, no?
With absolute certainty probably
I mean yeah thereâs a billion Ceratopsid bones, a handful are probably secretly Toro
Even so, Torosaurus is a cool animal and one of my favorite ceratopsian
Trike and Toro are also incredibly close, Triceratopsini is a Lancian biota radiation
so technically it's easy to add it ?
Could be

Toro and Achelou are IMO extra alt material
Achelou for Pachyrhinosaurus I'd assume
Yep
Einio and Achelou are super neat
Damn Nacho Libre
The Styraco-Pachyrhino sequence is awesome
It really is
What the fuck is Einio doing with that nosehorn
Penta-Trike has a few more gaps I believe
My guess is opening letters
FWIW, Toro has plenty of diversity, and the "if associated with pierced frill Toro, otherwise Trike" is a diagnosis I'm keen will have misassigned specimens
Getting the pecking order sorted out?
Penta is cool one too .
Penta, Chasmo (both species), done and done
Chasmosaurus' lineage was doing weird stuff with the horns tho
As usual, we need more stuff from ~72 MYA
Chas is DPF yeah? Or Horseshoe
DPF
I think it's really funny how of the 3 we have ingame from DPF, para didn't meet either of the others
.. nevermind I read the chart wrong
Why is reading so hard
Para and Cory don't overlap with Styraco, pretty much (but they do with Centro, which may have evolved into Styraco)
We don't have cory
We have labeo
Which had a bit of overlap with para and existed mostly contemporary with styra
I know, was mentioning the popular species
With a Scolosaurus alt, yeah
Then they might have labeled an insectivore as a carnivore
Don't think any gliding "lizard" was eating much more than arthropods
Kuehneosaurus has a SVL of about 55 cm, Kuehneosuchus is about the same size in length if a bit bigger. Coelurosauravus has an 18 cm SVL and Weigeltisaurus would even bigger than that. There are some varanid even smaller than these guys that will snack upon small lizards like Varanus caudolineatus
So I don't think it's out of the picture for them to be carnivores, though I think the teeth do suggest a diet of anthropods first and foremost
Is V. caudolineatus the snacker or the snackee
snacker
It is true that modern day gliding lizards are insectivores but they're also smaller
What is SVL?
Snout to vent length
It's a way of stating the animal's size without including the tail
Oh I see
Yeah like 20cm total and they're very tail heavy for length
D. blanfordii can reach about 12 cms SVL
23 cm with the tail
but that's still smaller than the prehistoric gliders I'm thinking of
I personally lean towards the two Permian gliders (if only because of Mau's statement and their fossils are better) but I wish it was Kuehneosuchus
Canât wait to get the giant fungi if we mimic specific Palaeozoic habitats.
How big is weigeltisaurus again
I don't know to be honest.
Give me the fungus adjacent Prototaxites
đ dropped this king
I've never found a good measurement and I'm not trained to interpret length from individual bones. But based on its skull and other mentions in papers I could find, it's bigger than Coelurosauravus
To be more specfic; the skull of Coelurosauravus is 3.4 to 3.7 cm in length, the skull of Weigeltisaurus is 6 cm
Not a single goddamn word on this Wikipedia page even estimates length
There's also the issue that from 1987 to 2015, they were synonymous
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284156582_Substantiation_of_Validity_of_the_Late_Permian_Genus_Weigeltisaurus_Kuhn_1939_Reptilia_Weigeltisauridae
Separate species though
Yeah, but most books for the public don't bother to go deeper than species
Why would they, the public doesn't care about specifics
/s
So, scaling the estimated 35cm of Coelurosauravus based on the length of the skull from 3.5 cm to the 6cm skull of Wigeltisaurus
Looking at very rough estimate of ~60cm, or about 2 ft
Snout to tail, assuming same proportions
I'd go ±10cm on that estimate
Thought the same
I checked a couple of papers and not a single one mentions its total length
It's pretty sizable glider for a tree dweller
fr
my state has no xenarthrans đ„
however if global warming keeps letting nine bandeds expand their range we might have some sooner or later
already sighted in some neighboring states
I see their corpses on the side of the road, so they're already here
Shame
unfortunate
what state?
im in MN btw
they are rarely sighted in Iowa which is the state immediately south of us
South of Iowa, North of Texas (don't want to get more specific than that)
Oh hey I'm near there too
Don't think I've seen any armadillers tho
If glyptodons survived to modern day would we just call them Armado?
ArmadĂłn
Armadeddon
I always thought of the Armadigran
since "Dillo" means little one, hence the name Armadillo (Armored Little One)
or something like that
but Gran means Great or Big
so Armadigran would be Armored Big One
a bit uncreative I know but makes somewhat decent sense
at least IMO
I'm gonna let the person with 30+ years of Spanish handle that
They would probably have a different name
Well of course, I was just playing off of Armadillo name
Big hairy turtle
Maybe a name in Mapudungun would take precedent, in similar way how quetzal is derived of a different indigenous language
Armadillos are tatĂșs in a sizeable part of their range after all
And, at the end of the day, capybaras aren't called Guinea bigs; both them and cavyys have plenty of regional names, but I don't think they end up referencing each other, so the same may have happened if Glyptodonts were alive
100%
well they should be
while we're at it, i want the Guinea biggest
As someone else has pointed out in the main chat
The vivarium got also ropes around the trees
It's possible the lizard is just purely arboreal without gliding and just walks on the ropes
multiple modes of locomotion
I'd also point out that was I think for the second smallest viviarium, who knows what the 4X4 is like
yeah that's the 4x8
Josephoartigasia, like the pacarana, are more of a chinchilla tho
The NA capybara, on the other hand... đ€
These are the ones I was talking about
Hydrochoerus hesperotiganites and Neochoerus
there are actual bigger extinct capybara
phugatherium was a very big extinct relative of capybaras that had proportionally longer legs
This discussion has got me googling extinct capybaras and learning there's a faunal stage called Rancholabrean
indeed
for some reason he looks
you can see the massive size difference in skulls with the living capybaras all the way to the right
Now I wonder if Guinea fits maras also have giant extinct members of their group
The main reason why I think this is glider due to these ropes allegadely being enrichment structures
So in theory animal should function relatively well without them
For people who do want to build more naturalistic vivariums
idk in my opinion it would be cool if instead of adding ceratosaurus, they added an older member that is similar (ish) to it, most notably saltriovenator, but still something reasonably different. you could also takes some creative liberties with it more then cerato, due to the sparse material, so i think this would be a cool choice.
some form of large phytosaur could also supplement the overused crocodile like creatures such as sarcosuchus, deinosuchus, and purrusaurus. instead something like collososuchus could be added, or if you werent looking at the reptilian route, prionosuchus would also work well in my eyes
Prionosuchus as an exhibit animal would be problematic
because of its reproductive mode
and its size, it would be far better suited too a semi aquatic role closer to spinosaurus
how is Prionosuchus better as a semi aquatic than a crocodilian like Deinosuchus?
I never said it was better, i specifically wanted to trying and use something less known and less overused, such as Deinosuchus in particular