#Community Species Suggestions
1 messages · Page 50 of 1
Wow, talk about that
I mistook Patagomaia for Juramaia
Anyways, the Patagonian monther in question:
important question as I am making my list; is Koolasuchus too big?
could it even be an exhibit animal?
I feel like the answer is that it isn't too big and that it couldn't be an exhibit animal due to it not being an amniote
I dunno really
This size chart is from 2023, and who knows if this holds up today
Koolasuchus could be an exhibit animal for sure
Juramaia985
as I said we have no clue what it is
aside from "big mammal"
Well there is a Jurassic Spider, so uhhh
IF the Gurlin Tsav skull had a name it'd be a cool terrarium critter. Possible cretaceous sparassodont
Could always get this guy
that seems
impossible to see in game
I'd say anything smaller than an adult human hand feels implausible
nah I love adding animals smaller than the in-game resolution
"its there guys, trust"
THE AVERAGE FLY CAME FROM THE MIDDLE TRIASSIC!?
John Hammond's flea circus DLC
WHAT!? EVEN WASPS, BEES, ANTS AND SAWFLIES CAME FROM THE TRIASSIC!?
hymenoptera did but not every modern hymenopteran burst forth fully formed in the Anisian
sawflies are known from the Triassic
the clade of wasps, bees, and ants are Jurassic in origin, but they only became social in the Cretaceous
You're misunderstanding what those charts mean
and ants only became super common post K/Pg
this just means that their group split off from their closest relatives at that time
the basal hymenopteran of the triassic would only remotely resemble the species found today; especially since flowers hadn't evolved yet
termites are only known for sure in the Cretaceous but there's a lot of reasons to believe they were around in the JUrassic
or even earlier if some people are right
kinda like permian ichthyosaurs
which probably existed
but we cant know for certain
till we find fossils anyway
or if we do
yeah, but we dont have specialist ichthyosaur eating permian animals
how do we know icthyosaurs didn't just emerge out of the siberian traps fully formed?
ok yeah nevermind
this is the prevailing theory
honestly I think they were formed from the mass death and suffering
ignore my previous blunder
hence why they are such cursed creatures
every hand bone represents an animal that died in agony in the great dying
because we know they were the creation of an aesthetically-minded giant squid
And I just noticed theres alot of Mesozoic ants
there are lots of ants period so makes sense
Unordered Vivarium Wishlist:
Terrestrial
• Deinogalerix
• Arthropleura
• Pterodactylus
• Diictodon
• Hyperodapedon
Semi-Aquatic
• Didelphodon
• Vancleavea
• Diplocaulus
• Hibbertopterus
• Koolasuchus
Arboreal
• Microleo
• Sharovipteryx
• Coelurosauravus
• any Drepanosaur
• Plesiadapis
Interesting choice to put pterodactylus as terrestrial vs semi-aquatic
Yeah Pterodactylus deserves to be ingame anyways
First pterosaur to have been discovered and described in general, needs more love
but it wasn't semi aquatic?
unless I am unaware of something
most stuff recently I've seen finds it as a terrestrial animal
it was feeding near the water but that doesnt make it semi aquatic, that's like calling a sandpiper semiaquatic
I mean dimorphodon is found in marine sediments and it would have been able to make it 20 feet over the water lmao
Oh damn Pterodactylus was a generalist, I thought we had evidence suggesting it was piscivorous
my life has been a lie
or a seagull really
recent paper suggests they were blown by wind
Ramphorhynchus seems like the main pterosaur that was actually hanging out regularly in the lagoons
and others were blown from trees by hurricanes, hence the bias towards smaller/younger individuals
*Rhamphorhynchus
FUCK
Why does it feel like most Pterosaurs are assumed to be piscivorous?
huh?
THERE ARE SO MANY SILENT HS IN ONE WORD WHY
why arboreal?
Yes
pretty sure it was just terrestrial
perching spots in trees
most are found in aquatic sediments
also see this
terrestrial would probably just be ground and no perching spot
Well not just that
yeah but it biases us towards piscivorous species being preserved
In a lot of the ones that have teeth, the teeth are conical
there's a 100% chance we only know a tiny part of pterosaur diversity, because they're so hard to preserve
I feel like given that most of the time it would have either been flying or on the ground it is safe to call Pterodactylus a terrestrial flier
like, turkeys aren't arboreal
true but when we're discussing the terrariums it's more about what paths and animations are available
I keep forgetting that turkeys can fly
Microraptor probably wasnt super arboreal
wild turkeys do sit in trees more than you would think, but generally speaking yeah
but it makes sense to be in an arboreal terrarium
this is whats really important yeah
for Pterodactylus I think its animations would be foraging for food on the ground and flying around the vivarium, maybe with a large perch that one would occasionally fly up to
ye
and for that I think that uhhh
arboreal makes the most sense
since I kinda doubt terrestrial would really have a spot to perch
given that recent paper indicates that at least some were in trees a good part of the time I think maybe a bit more than that
When we talk about vivariums and people are just making up genera on the spot
I will say I dont think there's any reason for Vancleavea to be a vivarium species
what?
why?
it's incredibly well preserved
and a unique triassic species
it's not small or in need of specialized movement, it could easily be a full species
um
Just a joke about all these glupshitto taxon I’ve never heard of.
it is very much small what
skill issue
Yes!
the really good specimen is but
Oh yeah that thing
they got real big
How much is actually known of the giant one?
are we sure the giant one isn't just a different, related species?
Vanc is a funny beast
no, but that's true of Vancleavea in general, it's still debated if it's one taxon or many, but might as well treat it as such for game purposes
ok
but to be clear I ADORE Vancleavea and desperately want it in the game
plush animal
plush made of chainmail
look at this shit, that's just overkill
even its tail fin is made of armor
I mean crocodilians do that
thats not a fin
I mean… is it not?
no
the main propulsive surface is formed by the caudal vertebrae and muscles, unlike in Vancleavea
I mean, sure, but either way the fin is being armoured, no?
Gotta be tough when you live in the same environment as giant phytosaurs and rauisuchids
Arboreal
Kuehneosuchus latissimus
Jeholopterus ninchengensis
Longisquama insignis
Notharctus tenebrosus
Saniwa ensidens
Terrarium
Ceratogaulus hatcheri
Lystrosaurus murrayi
Heterodontosaurus tucki
Deinogalerix koenigswaldi
Arthropleura armata (though I've read there's good evidence for a semi-aquatic lifestyle)
Semi-Aquarium
Diplocaulus magnicornis
Indohyus major
Castorocauda lutrasimilis
Ichthyornis dispar
Liaoningosaurus paradoxus
If this include full-aquatics then Tullimonstrum gregarium, Gebrayelichthys uyenoi, and Henodus chelyops
Interesting to see a handful of taxa show up in almost every list and also there be so much variety lol
Arthropleura semiaquatic??
Its an idea that's been tossed around
yeah I grouped it with semiaquatic in my list
what happened to my beloved nanuqsaurus??
Forgotten by the thread
kid named piece of a maxilla
In a formation with two cryptids
What Dinopithecus glazers would have to defend their view of it being a badass killer baboon if they couldn't use edgy paleoart:
it's a big baboon that's scary enough
regular baboons are scary
yeah but that's it, it's just a big baboon
not even particularly carnivorous or anything
Dinopithecus and Gigantopithecus are the only two monkeys PK has any chance of having
as exhibit animals maybe
I wish we had more remains of either tbh
I think it should just be Gigantopithecus imo, let Hadropithecus or Archaeolemur be your baboon stand-ins
why have a stand in when we can have an actual baboon
archaeolemur is basically just a big regular lemur
archaeoindris is the only lemur with a legitimate chance imo
it belongs to an entirely extinct family and it and Hadropithecus are the most terrestrial strepsirrhines (not just lemurs) to have ever evolved to our knowledge
like ik archaeolemur is monkey convergent but the layman wont be able to tell in life
or in game for that matter
you could use this same argument to try to exclude Thylacines and instead add an extinct species of Jackal or something
a big baboon is just a big baboon
thats a terrible argument lmao thylacines are iconic
not saying they aren't
I'm saying "why add this animal convergent with some other animal when you can just add the animal that it is convergent with" is a dumb argument
i just think there are much better primate picks than just lemurs, especially if we can get an actual monkey
which deinopithecus is one of the few that fits the mold of not needing arboreal anything
why
i dont think we need like a bunch, personally if we even just get gigantopith id be satisfied
Gigantopithecus and to a much lesset extent Dinopithecus are the only real options for exhibit monkeys
for minis ig darwinius would be cool
because they are actually unlike anything alive today and interesting in their own right?
you could say that about many smaller extinct primates that fit vivariums
they represent a now lost diversity of not just lemurs but in primates as a whole
but we aren't talking about vivariums
for arboreal stuff thats really all that can work
and ik archaeolemur was more terrestrial but personally i dont see the hype in it as an inclusion
if you want a terrestrial lemur, archaeoindris is the pick imo
GIVE ME EINIOSAURUS MAU, AND MY SOUL IS YOURS
Also what are we discussing U19 for? Did something change?
In theory it's still an art and final touches update
roadmap added more species at some point
Archaeoindris would look clunky on land
Like its big, but known remains still indicate similar thing to palaeopropithecus
yeah pretty sure Archaeoindris had like
an orangutan thing going
just a really big arboreal primate that could go on the ground but was more at home in the trees
Wish there was arboreal locomotion like in PZ, but I understand there isnt
I think its likely that we'll get enrichment items for it down the line
We are still due to get "toy" enrichment down the line
Hadropithecus and Archaeolemur look nothing like baboons and you know this
Something similar to Eucalyptus Feeder in PZ would be nice
They have convergences with the broader family of monkeys baboons are in, yeah, but they don't fill the niche of "big baboon"
Especially because they're small enough they'd probably be minis honestly
God I hope so
Even if it doesn't provide half the actual climbing extent some of these animals would do in the wild, it'd be nice to have at least a bit of it
I never said so
And yeah this is true but it'd be like saying adding the Mammoth is a waste because there's proboscideans way more unlike either surviving species. People want stuff like platybelodon, but nobody in their right mind is saying that platybelodon should have been added instead of mammoths
Well how are they supposed to be baboon stand ins then
they are terrestrially specialized primates and are literally likened to baboons in how they would have moved when they were alive. They didn't particularly look like baboons but they are, at least imo, more interesting inclusions than Dinopithecus would be
Ok but like Daspletosaurus and T.rex moved the same way, so therefore we don't need T.rex if we have Daspleto
"how they would have moved" doesn't really scratch the itch for baboon tbh. Similar methods of terrestrial locomotion but I don't think baboons are interesting purely for how they walk
And I mean like
Why do we have to pretend like they need to be mutually exclusive
That's dumb
im not saying that
Like with the Mammoth point- why not have both mammoth and platybelodon
Realistically a taxon with more star power is gonna win
i just think big baboon is objectively cooler tbh. Plus we have like no other true monkeys that fit the mold of what could work
You keep saying you think adding dinopithecus would be a waste and they should add half a dozen random tiny lemurs instead
Which in this case is Dinopithecus lol
no I haven't??? I have literally only mentioned 3 lemurs, and 2 of them would be alts of each other
my thinking is that as far as exhibit primates should go, Gigantopithecus is a necessary addition and after it comes the potential subfossil lemurs that can be added and Dinopithecus
i also think dinopith has a unique role as like, one of the very few mainland africa cenozoic picks that are popular enough
Agreed
right, that's it, several subfossil lemurs before dinopithecus at all
also none of the animals I suggested are tiny
deinotherium, sivatherium, and platybeledon also come to mind but they also arent exclusive to africa
And also like complaining about dinopithecus' remains being fragmentary is silly when gigantopithecus is like, this
thats not giganto
-Arsinoitherium
-Megistotherium
-Moeritherium
and many more
also where EZ
I wasnt even complaining about it being fragmentary
also like
Prehistoric Planet: Ice Age might change popularity a little depending on what will be featured from Africa I think
As is complaining that dinopithecus is only considered cool because of "edgy paleoart" or whatever when like 2/3rds of gigantopithecus paleoart is "omg bigfoot in real"
havent seen his daily we need posts in a while 🙁
I think they meant like late cenozoic
if we had full exhibit arboreal stuff id genuienly make the case for sivapithecus but sadly it wont happen
we all know that Gigantopithecus is fragmentary, but it being the largest primate ever supercedes that and it had a close relative to go off of
Didnt EZ crashout and leave or am I misremembering
wut, when
Oh do I get to drop the Ternary Graph again?
Big baboon cool af
if dinopith gets in can we at least agree there should be a Ronpasta easteregg
Ronpasta
a what
you mean that one about joschuas monkey cruise piece?
yeah
lol classic
Nigel mentions seeing art of dinopithecus interacting with ancient humans
in what?
dinopithecus mentioned in PK????
That would be fucking hilarious
If someone could pay him to do that it would be so funny
copypasta btw
listen ok, Dinopithecus wouldn't necessarily be a bad choice, but I would hate to see it get in instead of a subfossil lemur
Imo the only one that really has a good chance over Dino is Archeoindris
regretfully I agree
but I do hope that others can get added too
honestly it feels the most likely for them to just add Gigantopithecus and Archeoindris, since that would get both sides of the primate family tree
i do think its quite likely we could get a vivarium primate eventually
I agree
Read in Nigel voice:
"I'm still thinking about an art piece I saw recently that reconstructed Dinopithecus interacting with ancient humans, with brilliant symbolism reflecting the differences between two ancient primates and our own evolutionary history. It makes one wonder how similar interactions between dinopithecus and modern humans-our guests- might be."
attempt at a realistic reference
tho there is so many its hard to even narrow down
but this convo is just about exhibit species
I'd be surprised if we didn't at least get Darwinius
Its like one of the only ancient primates that people actually know
Thank you WWB
Still a major branch that would kinda go unrepresented this way
WWB monke was godinotia
Huh ig not
which major branch
Series is older than darwinius discovery
Wikipedia has Apidium
Apidium is the one from africa
erm, true monkeys
I don't remember there being a monkey in episode one?
the distinction between apes and monkeys is silly
i think briefly when there is the whole deadly gas scene
Regardless its apparently not called that anymore
they had sex
Its now Pronycticebus
It was monkeying around in background
fun fact there was sex in every WWB episode
this is like saying the distinction between tyrannosauroids and tyrannosaurids is silly
Been a long time since I've seen WWB tho
there is a distinction even if one is within the other
To be fair godinotia didnt play major role in first episode
neither is as big a distinction as there is between Strepsirrhines and Haplorhines
exactly
It was there to show primate origin
Like technically yeah but everyone and their mother knows that there's differences between apes and non ape monkeys
"ah yes apes are monkeys thus they represent the sum total of haplorhine diversity"
Like bro this is starting to come off like a fucking "I arbitrarily hate dinopithecus specifically" gag
Now with pretty good damn primate fossil from Messel they would use darwinius instead
did you seriously just call me bro
Darwinius is still the only one that most people are able to name by memory alone
idk there is a big gap
And its great material so
Ya, but again WWB is older than darwinius
Oh sorry I use the term gender neutrally by habit. Did not mean anything by it
So they did use something else
Ok we've moved past that
Darwinius good monke. I initially though its going to be the mammal for vivarium
Same
Not that I don't want a million birds
Because there is dev Ida and Darwinius fossils is named Ida
And she likes mammals
Drepanosaurs my beloved
we are getting an arboreal lizard
Suminia as well
im still convinced its something totally unexpected
Suminia is so cool
this kind of falls a part when you remember that how we use "monkey" when excluding apes is paraphyletic
The fact lizard is prolly not insectivorous is still insane to me
but im stumped as to exactly what, barbaturex is what im guessing but im far from convinced lol
it only exists in some languages
yeah
There's no ape that's closer to other monkeys than it is to another ape
Therefore, a real grouping
also are we just gonna ignore that Platyrrhines and Cercopithecoids are their own groups
and are what people usually mean by monkey
Then why bring up paraphyly?
apes are just part of Catarrhini
Yeah no
which includes Cercopithecoidea and apes
sorry you
Cercopithecoidea is specifically the sister group to apes (hominoidea)
you used groups from different classifications
so i got confused
you grouped a parvorder with a family and I assumed both were the families
either way those two groups are some of the largest and most widespread of all primates, so it feels odd to just skip over them imo
^
^
It's an insanely large and diverse group and to say it's completely acceptable and in fact preferable for it to be boiled down to one single member while it would be tragic if there weren't multiple lemuroids feels a little silly
Yeah I can't think of any but I'm not as knowledgeable on them (and also idk if the fossil record for them is all that good anyway?)
That said though I don't think vivariums should be excluded from the discussion
Especially with primates
Was looking around for the hell of it to see if there was maybe anything at all
And came across this fella who gave me a laugh
Homunculus (Latin: [hɔˈmʊŋkʊlʊs]; "little person") is an extinct genus of New World monkey that lived in Patagonia during the Miocene. Two species are known: Homunculus patagonicus and Homunculus vizcainoi, which are known from material found in the Santa Cruz Formation in the far south of Argentina. Reaching a latitude of ~55°S at the ti...
lol
Because I can think of like, very few primates that are actually suitable to be full exhibit animals- p much archaeoindris, gigantopithecus, and dinopithecus
But there's TONS of vivarium potential species
Holy shit I love him
there's nothing wrong with the monkey lemurs as exhibit animals, they aren't even too small
im gonna actually be shocked if i somehow correctly guess the arboreal lizard is this guy
Can you imagine Nigel having to say fuckin Homunculus lmfao
if I had to choose an actual lizard as a terrarium species I would go with the giant shingleback skink
I think they're kinda borderline though aren't they
There is few like late pleistocene caipora, which is big enough to be exhibit species. It is just neither largest primate to ever exist or super ,,dangerous,, so few people talk about it
tbf we are also getting quite large vivariums so who knows
somethingarcanum
maybe but they are about as large as any typical zoo monkey
Like they're small enough that they'd be pushing it for regular exhibits, which is why I'd go to vivariums so you can better represent the arboreal behaviors
and their babies wouldn't be exceptionally tiny
Yeah and that's tiiiiny by PK standards lol
Tbf a lot of things are lol
We're dealing with some of the largest animals on land
I think the only animals that weigh less than the archaeolemuris estimate I'm looking at are leaellyn and velo
honestly
Right, but I mean even discounting the big stuff they'd be among the absolute smallest terrestrial animals in the game
As would Dinopithecus tbh
Archaeolemur weighed 40-58lbs
Check caipora and protopithecus
Would fit alongside other late pleistocene megafauna from SA
Hadropithecus weighed 60-77lbs
Hadropithecus is decently sized
Male Dinopith get to like 100lbs on average
Oviraptor weighed like 73-88, psittaco mongoliensis was like 44 lbs, proto was like 137 lbs minimum
But it seems like the largest ones could get up to 170?
Yeah probably
so then Archaeo/Hadro are just large enough
dodo as a mini exhibit would be really sad
And yeah I think dinopith is about as small as you can get before it starts to feel Really Tiny because primates don't have the advantage of tails to make them look bigger that dinosaurs do
Would feel weird to have dodo in a terrarium
the tails also add a lot to the weight of dinosaurs
Not in the same way at least yeah
Imo if they can do it with compy I wouldn't object with dodo
But anyway for a primate that's on the borderline I feel like I'd rather get them as vivarium animals even if they technically weigh enough
Compy is different tbh
Because you can handle their behaviors a little better that way
Actually climbing and such
(and then just limit them to the larger vivariums)
pretty sure dodos got to about as tall as psittaco
Yeah
It's the chicks I'd worry about with dodo personally but if they could pull it off I could see it
dodo chicks can be velo chick sized
I think we are being a bit mislead about minimum dimensions for exhibit animals when our smallest exhibit animals have up to this point all been dinosaurs whose dimensions can't be plotted the same way as mammals
Ok I have found the definitive best dodo size comparison
Wow that image quality is dogwater
im honestly really excited about vivariums, the new patreon post shows a lot more flexibility than seen before which is hype
like it would feel wrong for so many mammals to get relegated to vivariums for no reason when they could function just as well in exhibits
Welp that's it this is our new standard
am i gonna fork out 10$ to read the new patreon posts?
The Dyson has to be the bare minimum exhibit animal size
See, I don't really see it that way tbh
As in animals get "relegated" to vivariums
people would absolutely say that with the Dodo
I think that no matter how limited they are, the option to have an animal is better than not getting it
Whoops no more taco, velo, or proto
And that's a nice bit of diversity for the game
delete them. Vacuum them up
It's the same as stuff like tiktaalik
I'd rather it be in a vivarium than not get it at all
like unironically stuff as big as titanoboa possibly working now, tho its kinda pushing it
the thylacine would absolutely be "relegated" to a vivarium species if made into one
Which iirc was something posited a good ways back- things like amphibians being vivarium only because their ontogeny makes them unreasonably difficult to pull off
Relegated how though
Like if that were the only option
it would be a disservice
I'm not saying it IS the only option but if it came down to that
thylacines are taller than psittacosaurus
Titanoboa is basically a perfect for the largest vivarium going by AZA standards on snake enclosures
vivarium picks arent about weight but size and difficulty with offspring / locomotion
"this is the best way we can implement this animal to do it justice/have it function properly"
the thing with Titanoboa is that it could only work in a terrarium
Titanoboa as an exhibit animal would not only be a nightmare for the devs
it would also be unrealistic
Size being dimenstion in this case
since when have you seen a snake in an open air exhibit?
arthropluera could 100% work inside one of these too with plenty of space
So idk why weight was brought up ngl
Yeah weight was a bad comparison on my part tbh
weight was brought up because Tropicola said that the monkey lemurs were too small
I know that
I'm saying that arguing over weight alone makes very little sense
Cause that's not how vivarium size is determined
also i dont think this is supposed to be super secret info or anything, just cant share pics, but the biggest vivarium atm is 16m long
They got sized up?
theres multiple
Not necessarily too small (though def pushing it) but borderline too small, at which point my thinking is "vivariums would probably be a better way to implement an arboreal primate" since you can do a lot more climbing behaviors that way
There was a big and a small
there is a new biggest and smallest option
Versus currently, where there's zero climbing options at all
Big was 12m, small was 8
theres 4 options atm
they were terrestrial
Did they do the 4x4?
Hell yeah
Like purely terrestrial or just more terrestrial than other lemurs
also mentions potential minimum size requirement which i shouldnt be reading into but gives me hope for the big stuff like arthropluera
everything I've read says they'd still climb, they just spent a bit more time on the ground
But idk
Ultimately very silly debate
Well I'm sure minimum size is just "this animal will not fit in something too small"
ye
Cause even holotype sized Tiktaalik are like 2m?
Which putting that in a 4x4m box would be sad lol
If we're going to daydream about adding animals beyond all reason and evidence for them why arbitrarily limit oneself. "They can only add 2 primates and 1 has to be a lemur" is silly methinks
you can say this for, quite literally, every primate ever
the monkey/baboon lemurs are the most terrestrially adapted strepsirrhines ever
vivarium spec is gonna be so fun for the future cause unironically they could so easily turn these into aquariums
Yeah it certainly seems that way
I wonder if they'll do null options on a true aquarium version
im not being arbitrary here this is about being realistic you can't expect primates to get a ton of slots
behold the magical block of floating water housing several trilobites
Lmfao
Yeah this is why I don't consider animals ending up in vivariums as "relegating"
Depends on the animal imo
dodos or thylacines would absolutely be relegated
I'm one of the freaks who thinks they should make full size flyers+aquatics an enlarged version of the vivarium system if they have to
also while stuff is still "looped" it looks like its gonna be a lot more seamless and technical
Put the quetz on a track I don't give a fuck, if it means I get quetz where I otherwise wouldn't I'm game
def not free roam or anything but they prolly will go more in depth in it in a dev log
In an ideal world aquatics and aerials get as much full movement as possible
the Quetz loop
Lmao
I mean sure yeah but if you actually want to play it realistic we should ban all speculation until we have the performance numbers for the released game
that isnt playing realistically that's being negative
that's assuming the game will fail entirely to get enough for more than the RE dlc
The point of this thread is for suggestions/talking about animals that would be cool, and I deliberately don't participate here much (because I like to temper my expectations) but I think it's silly to arbitrarily restrict oneself (and others) in a discussion about "animals that would be cool"
also i can say rn these vivariums are better than PZs
Not a high bar
like they aint complete but all the stuff going into them is cool
wont feel like lifeless boxes
I mean I'm kinda basing that assumption on stuff the devs have said before. They don't know what the release performance will end up being like and they can't exactly start developing DLC until they do know. For all we know they could end up with enough success to add 10+ primates, or it could be a minor success, but not enough to get primates at all
My point is there's no way to predict how many animals we'll get post release and what the "budget" for various animal groups is
So why focus too much on that when you could instead discuss the individual merits of a species
ESPECIALLY because there will ALWAYS be more cool species than can ever get into PK
real question is would arthropleura be a terrestrial vivarium or amphibious
And that's not being pessimistic that's just "there's hundreds of animals they could add, with all the money in the world they'd have to stop eventually"
So like. Talk about what would make an animal cool for PK and let the devs worry about the development budget, how many animals they're able to add, etc
Also fair
Arboreal, just to fuck with people
Lmfao
I could genuinely see either depending on the interpretation they decide on
Arthropleura would be terrestrial so that the most goated amphibious carboniferous arthropod can have a more distinct terrarium from it (Hibbertopterus)
they should add megarachne but as the outdated giant spider version
but then give it sea scorpion behavior
it's so funny how that episode even made people think that any giant spiders were around back then
big spiders are a surprisingly recent invention
you don't really see any beyond the late Cenozoic afaik
Yeah pretty sure that's the case
one of the many animals that you don't expect to be as recent as they are
another good example; echidnas
Its funny to me that Platypus are like at least late cretaceous in origin by contrast
Proof we live in the worst period in history
me want big bug
no
big bug, good
I like tarantula
The oldest known echidnas are only pliocene wth
tarantula so cutes
I figured they'd have been at least miocene
well lack of fossil evidence doesnt mean they aint older
Sure
And given how derived the pliocene echidna seems to be I expect they are much older
In all seriousness I do like tarantulas in spite of a general irrational aversion to Big Bugs
But we have a pretty ok miocene record in Aus so I would have expected to find them there too
PK should add one of those gajillion giant kangaroos
yeah current theory is that echidnas evolved from platypodes that lived in seclusion on islands and then they swam back to the mainland
I fucking hate being a biology student who loves shit like atlas moths but I start involuntarily recoiling if they get too close to me
not to offend but that sounds stupid as fuck
What the fuck
other animals around there evolved on islands and then populated mainland environments
like megapodes
legit sounds like early victorian era biology
Macropus sp. .....
not sure
Monotremes are iconic Australasian species. But the origins of these species have continually raised questions for scientists; why aren’t they more present in the fossil record and why can we only find them in Australia and New Guinea? An international team with AM scientists find the answers!
``Millions of years ago existed proto-New Guinea, a series of continental fragments, before it developed into a single giant island (the Bird’s Head’s Islands are the best documented). During this period, this area had extremely shallow seas and it seems feasible that a land mass was joined to Australia. About 50 million years ago, these land masses separated, and a sub sample of Australian fauna became isolated on an island in what would become New Guinea – imagine a platypus-type creature on a tropical island without many rivers but ever-wet forest. This creature may leave the river systems and forage on the land, which is what the echidna did.
We know from echidna embryonic development that the echidna evolved from an animal that had a bill like a platypus, and we think they evolved on that island. We have evidence form around two million years ago that there was a big faunal interchange between that island in proto-New Guinea and Australia – so at that time, we think that Australian species went to that island and the echidna came back into Australia.``
This and procopto together just because of how weirdly different they are
It's easy to forget how much of a fucking freak procopto is
``“It was Kris [Professor Kristofer Helgen] who came up with the idea that the echidnas came from New Guinea and that came out of several meetings we had discussing all the possibilities and all of the options,” Flannery says. “And we finally just said it has to be New Guinea.
“So, our best guess is that they evolved on an island that eventually formed part of New Guinea,” Flannery says. Although there’s just one species of echidna spread right across Australia, New Guinea has several living species.
“And some time, maybe around 50 million years ago, one group of platypus-like ancestors gets isolated on this island off New Guinea and they are more terrestrial and these became the echidnas.
“The ancestors of the echidnas must have got separated on that island and being on a tropical island, a small island, there wasn’t a lot of river habitat for a platypus but there was lots of forever-wet forest and so they developed a more terrestrial way of living.”``
this makes me feel sad that we only have one extant browsing macropod
at least we have the one though
oh that's actually pretty interesting
I legit thought you meant that echidnas evolved in some small island and went swimming to australia to populate it 😭
let me disagree
Perhaps the sea urchins are a transitional form of echidna
wow echidna in a beach, such amazing proof that it is able to cross hundreds of miles of ocean
yeah that sounds more likely
finally some BELIEVABLE hypothesis
A temporary metamorphosis they undergo to cross the oceans and some remained permanently as urchins instead because they decided that there were kelp forests that needed decimation
echidna go to sea -> turn into urchin -> cross sea -> reevolve into echidna once reaching land
again
"swimming a lot" doesn't mean jackshit when it comes to crossing oceans
specially for such a small creature
the waters aren't that crazy between new guinea and australia
they literally connect to the land sooner than tasmania does to the mainland
Speaking of Aus
idk why youd go such lengths when we already know new guinea and australia connect by land, which is a way more plausible scenario
Obdurodon would be such a cool mini
have you not considered that they could have crossed via water when the land was closer
steropodon
instead of waiting until it was truly connected
I don't see how that matters when it ended up connecting anyway
Oops all jaw
right, the mass sea echidna migration
don't care, funny
did yall miss what i meant by the hedgehog thing
"sea urchin" literally means "sea hedgehog"
"urchin" is just an old word for hedgehog
what about 1mi long
what about that one uhhhhhhhhhhh
that aquatic thing that is a synapsid
or therapsid idk
Its so funny that you say that actually
"The name given to O. tharalkooschild was first discussed in a 1990 paper by Mike Archer, an Australian mammalogist, detailing a creation story with an Ugly Duckling motif in the context of palaeontology.[15][4] A philosophical examination of historical sciences such as palaeontology, published in 2018, uses the tooth of this platypus as an example of the results obtainable by multiple methods of research into traces of evidence; the author refers to the species by the vernacular "platyzilla".[16]"
Tharalkooschild is the largest Obdurodon sp for reference
Castorocauda?
Secodontosaurus exhibit animal
Anything to get more piscivores at this point
But it's not a true mammal ? , it's a cynodonts
And?
The webbed feet are kinda speculative ig but yes it is a real animal
and not every Cynodont is a true mammal
And?
We don't know whether or not the hint indicates it's a crown-mammal though I suspect it is, certainly more so than arboreal lizard is an actual squamata
And what ...
Didn't they say mammal explicitly ? , but I hope this true . I want to see Jurassic semi aquatic mammal
like I don't understand the comment, so what that it is not a true mammal?
"I'd like to see this animal"
"but it's not a true mammal"
okay? and?
iz cool critter i think
Yes, but again, people were also thinking that lizard meant things like Longisquama or Coelurosauravus (mostly because the best known extinct lizards are aquatic)
huh what are you talking about now
What's confusing? That when people were looking for arboreal "lizards" they were looking at things that were lizardlike but not a true lizards because people couldn't think of any famous true extinct lizards with arboreal lifestyle? That it's possible semi-aquatic mammal could possibly be say a Mammaliaforme but not part of Mammialia. Or that the most famous extinct lizards (the mosasaurs) are aquatic?
I mean maybe read the convo and you'll see that you are replying to things from a completely unrelated topic
I'm replying to a comment that asked me a question? I fail to see the problem.
read further up lol
I think all these are meant to confuse us lol
Of course they are, they're not suppose to be obvious, but keep us guessing to stay engaged
that's basic marketing
I mean there true mammals and there are mammals like animals, perhaps they're talking about one of this two . I agree , even there big Cynodonts the size of black bears ,https://youtu.be/xwdT_LpuvUo
Please enjoy this video examining the mammal-like Cynodonts, a very successful clade of Synapsids that filled many niches during the Triassic, giving to the true Mammaliaformes by the end of the Period.
https://www.deviantart.com/drpolaris
https://www.patreon.com/c/DrPolaris
Sources used for this video:
Bajdek, Piotr (2015). "Microbiota and ...
Some of them can fit as normal animals in the game
Cynognathus my beloved
Be great for a Mesozoic pack focused on non-dinos
ohh, that's a big boy
Oh, Kannemeyeria was a contemporary. Bonus
Literally gotta talk about it and Lystrosaurus when teaching high school biogeo anyway
Perhaps after aquatic and aerial animals
Every single textbook comes with a version of this
ture...
ignoring the fact thats not a very good map of southern pangea
it gets the point across tho
Yeah, the Gondwana mockup is more focused on the distribution of the modern continents than on paleogeography, which is not the point of the lesson
ye
that also explains why they are more or less the same shapes as the modern continents too with small canals inbetween, whereas irl they would have been connected entirely
definitely works to get the point across though as said above
totally not me nitpicking high school material
I mean, the details of paleogeography are not in the curriculum, but continental drift since the Triassic is; gotta start small and build up from there, education in any topic starts small and then you build up on that, polishing unprecise stuff used first to get an important point across
Also the fact that Cynogathus has been found in Antarctica
They don't want the lines to overalp
That image is also quite old
So you've got things in the wrong location as well; Cynogathus is further south in Africa
It varies depending on the textbook, I've seen stuff from romerograms being passed as phylo trees, to whales being outright stated to be hoofed mammals while explaining evolution
Again
Sure, but accepting that what you learned in high school is simplified to the point of being wrong in some cases is a hard thing for a lot of people.
It is literally how everything is learned and not just in high school tho
Parallels and simplifications until there is a good grasp
Last year when that map came Up on my geology lesson half of the class was falling asleep
Which for the record were 6 people including me
No need to overcomplicate info for people they don't care about It on a basic course
Keep the detailed map for Uni
I basically blew the minds out of my first students when, after the usual giraffe example to contrast Lamarckist and Darwinian models, I introduced them to okapies and sivatheres, and that was spring 2016
and Erythrosuchus
Another good one
Small mammals to have in your vivarium: The Mesozoic flying squirrel would be fascinating.
Leptictidium anyone?
Leptictidium and Gigantoraptor feel likely to me ngl, by virtue of already being mascots of the in-game shop and the like
I honestly thought it was an Oviraptor.
but,I agree that we want a Leptictidium.
Giganto Gifts
I thought the letters were taken from Giganotosaurus.
I was mistaken.
A little late to this, but that threw me. I didn't realize Thylacines could get that large.
They were more like coyote than wolf sized after all
To be precise, dingo sized is apt I believe
wait was that Leptictidium ?
It's a good animal... competing with dozens of other good animals if large aquatics are coming
i'm on the placodus train. perfectly sized and unique looking animal. you could easily make something akin to a sea lion enclosure and it'd fit right into most zoos without being hard to spot or cramped.
when swimming would this thing have undulated left and right or up and down?
Side to side
At least according to Wikipedia
More specifically, a whole body movement
Like say an eel or snake
should we get "unenlagiids" before the phylo debate is settled
Only one so far is probably Austroraptor, yeah?
Unless you have to heavily bracket a creature's appearance, changing it's phylogenetic placement rarely has major effects on outward appearance
Unenlagia itself may work as an alt
And I say probably, since who knows if the study ends up becoming fact
that austroraptor was an unenlagiid or however the hell its pronounced or if i am thinking of something else
There are others that are part of the group, austroraptor is only the more famous one
It's a pretty sizeable group
Buitreraptor could work as a mini
Not sure if anything but that, Austro and Unenlagaia make much sense for additions to the game
There seems to be about 6 definitive Unenlagiines, and like 10+ more potential members
Unenlagaia also has two species
Would love to see Zavacephale as a terrarium creature or a mini.
I feel like it could in this case though right
idk what really distinguishes a paravian as avialan
from what unenlagiids do we have sickle claws?
because the avialan recons of austroraptor I've seen do not include them
Pretty sure we have sickle claws from smaller relatives
Idk why austroraptor wouldn't have it
Not to mention sickle claws appeared a lot of time in the lineage (birds and closely related groups)
That's due to people overblowing what "falls within Dromaeosauridae" and "falls within Avialae" implies for relatively well understood animals
No
The Deinonychosaur/Avialan split is one that gets troublesome because the early members are all quite samey in terms of bird characters; by pygostylians the bird line is apparent, but otherwise they are all raptor-like things
That boils down to one thing
Jeholornis being a great addition lol
Not really
These people are going to lose it when they see the toe claws of Ornitholestes and troodontids
part of the reason why I draw the line of "bird" at pygostylia
everything after that is very clearly birdlike in nature
everything before its
messier
S'all gradual, and everything in Pennaraptora would already feel like a bird, and everything in maniraptoriformes would be bird coded (and that'd be even more noticeable if moas and elephant birds were still around)
vivarium wishlist thingy
nice list
forgot tianyulong is so scruffy lol
Good list
I'm not really partial to any particular heterodontosaur over another (though I'd be fine with Tianyulong) and tbh I don't care about Zambalambadingdong but otherwise I'd love to get all of those someday
ain't Halszkaraptor still like
controversial?
the more related species we find the more it seems it does indeed have some semiaquatic adaptations
also Eohippus/Propaleotherium shouldn't be a terrarium animal
tho its diet now seems to be moreso on the insectivore side
yeah but who cares
eohippus is small enough
I wanna see them roam around a little fenced in forest with Gastornic as cohabs
I feel like mammalian hoofstock would be weird to see in terrariums
well eohippus is weird
like imagine an indoor gazelle exhibit
also ive seen mouse deer in aviary vivariums
we keep eohippus-like animals in the equivalent to vivariums in real life
mouse deer are mouse deer
👆
eohippus is around mouse deer size
wait it was smaller than Propaleotherium right
like Propaleo is large enough to be in exhibits right?
I will say that Eohippus doesn't have a fossorial lifestyle and while not everything in the terrarium has to be one, most of what we've seen at least suggests they could live in burrows
I don't think fossoriality is a prerequisite at all
like I think that's just a coincidence
one of those is not like the others
A lot of those are not like the others lol
would be a very silly limiter
Compsognathus
also yeah
I can still imagine Compy sleeping in the terrarium burrows
doesn't mean it made them
Titanoboa is way bigger than all the others
Arthropleura is also much larger than all the others aside from Titanoboa
still fits in the new vivariums
Part of the point of the vivariums to to be able to have animals with too complex locomotion/other biology that couldn't be represented in regular exhibits
in fact iirc someone said if you scale AZA snake vivarium reccomendations the PK vivariums fit for titanoboa
Not just small animals
yep
Huh
Specifically the 12x8 vivarium
I guess that’s why they renamed them from mini-exhibits to vivariums
also Titanoboa would be like, nearly impossible to make into a good looking exhibit animal
also titanoboa 90% of the time is gonna be submerged and still
The 4x8 vivarium would be rather cruel lol
I think the devs should avoid that headache
ngl though why is compy a vivarium animal
small
Because it is too small
90% of snakes barely moves in modern day zoos and as pets too lmao
if it were an exhibit animal its hatchlings would be miniscule
if titanoboa gets in i hope they make him wrinkly like its closest relative (iirc its this)
elephant trunk snake
I mean it’s definitely too small if an adult is smaller than a BABY RAPTOR
me going to the zoo and just sees a Retic in the pool for about 10 minutes
But that’s something the devs are unnecessarily doing to themselves
10 minutes? Lucky
a hypothetical “adult” compy is within the size ballpark of a small adult velo
I feel like you could come back 10 days later and that retiq would be in the same spot
Real
he is thriving and moisturized
Every so often i go to a zoo the snakes are just in the same spot everytime
to be fair, the snakes aren't usually given much to do either
I feel like enrichment for reptiles is pretty underutilized
It depends on species too like King Cobras are active while some snakes just hide and be done with it
good, if we give them too much intellectual stimulus the snakes will develop calculus and that'll be goodbye us
ig waterfall
food puzzles can be used
minecraft
Lmfao
I have seen pythons use those
i second minecraft
Interesting
Is there anything non-food related tho?
legitimate question, how much enrichment does a food puzzle really provide to an animal that only eats like every two weeks
I follow this tumblr user who owns some hognoses and they even know how to ask her to pet them
This is legit btw, i watched one of those behind the scenes zoo shows and the Taronga zoo is Aus uses this for some of their snakes
Also that
based
I mean this was a very small snake and it was tiny bits of food
ok that's fair
ig for some digging snakes there are sand pits
Snakes solving puzzles? Blackjack the Eastern Indigo demonstrates how intelligent snakes can be by effortlessly solving his first food puzzle.
Buy the puzzle here: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B082748C86/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Thank you for watching! Follow us even further into the Lair of Legless Legends, where ...
yeah snakes are smarter than people give them credit for
this video blew my mind when I first saw it
https://www.tumblr.com/scoriarose/786796085653979136/scoria-sweetly-asking-to-be-pet-she-does-this-all?source=share
Scoria sweetly asking to be pet. She does this all the time to ask for affection. She originally learned this by watching and mimicking. Many snakes enjoy being pet, they just don't often know how how to tell their humans as the way they express love and affection naturally is different than us.
Snakes naturally show love and affection to each other (especially babies with their mothers) by slithering all over her, giving affection through touch. Many people do not recognize this affection as it isn't as easy to see as a human petting, or an animal licking- most only see an animal trying to get from one place to another. They don't realize an expression of affection is being made- but if you watch for intent you can sometimes tell they are trying to be affectionate not just go somewhere.
Scoria learning by watching and mimicking helps show affection in a way more easy for humans to understand and relate to. Many times she'll express this further by petting ME after she's been given all t...
never thought I would ever see a snake asking to be pet
except we've only found them in deserts
said desert also has frog and crocodile fossils
but yeah NO WAY we'd ever get a non-vivarium snake
terrestrial crocs but yeah the frog is interesting
iirc there were prolly some smaller river systems running through the desert
there's a reason why no zoo sim ever to my knowledge has tried to do a free-moving snake, especially not a realistic one. Their movement is extremely complex and terrain-dependent
ye, thankfully the vivariums are large enough for titanoboa
yeah, like it wasn't a zoo sim but hearing about the nightmare that was coding Palaeophis as a playable for BOB made me realize just how unlikely it would be for us to ever get a free roaming snake in a zoo game
Or not if Ningyuansaurus ends up being one
palaeophis
that's got most of the same issues
Ya. This comparison is weird. Most other tiny ungulates are kept in outdoor exhibits and thats just because they throw them - duikers, muntjacs, klipspringer - alongside bigger species
Same for mouse deer, but it usually land together with tropical house fauna
Because it is convinient for zoo to exhibit them with birds
Not quite
Most issues for snakes are because they locomote over the ground
Still would rather see Propalaeotherium, because it is big enough
Which would be minimized, or if they gave live birth, completely neutralized
the comparsion was because they are overlapping in size
also like
its really not that weird
And the smallest vivarium is perfect for tetrapodophis (that tiny snake with even tinier legs)
also eohippus just has the most name recognition out of the tiny proto horses
Either that one or eohippus is fine with me
Also, the biggest vivarium might be enough for Arthropleura
it def will
Not even the biggest tbh
Arthro is only like 2m long
titanoboa is a boa, file snakes are not close to them at all. Opposite sides of the snake family tree
heard somethin about elephant trunk snakes and titanoboa before, maybe it was about aquatic habits instead of relation
They're thought to have similar ecologies yeah
its probably that both are fully aquatic fish eaters
Except much larger obv lol
The 4x8 size is probably more than enough
Beelzebufo could fit in all of them, except maybe the smallest(?)
Beelze is not that big lol
He'd be just fine in the 4x4
There are modern frogs larger than beelzebufo
the devil toad.... (read in Attenborough voice)
Propalaeotherium + Gastornis mixed exhibit sounds so good
Something something Birds eating fruit horses
this is a world...
where birds
GREET 🤝
🐴 horses
Honestly I wonder if irl Gastornis would be a poor candidate to cohab with Propaleotherium, not because it would attack the adults but imagine if it was on some Pelican shit and would try to swallow the babies whole
Given they're probably exclusively herbivores I doubt it
it'd be a massive waste not to make them alts if the separation holds up
Surprised lepticidum isn’t here
There's a lot of great options for terrariums out there and if you have to limit yourself to five per type, something good will be left inevitably.
I just know Vivariums will eventually get a ton of animals as time goes on
I just hope they end up being more useful than PZ’s mini animals
they 100% will
just the basic stuff we already know is SO much more advanced
Is it more advanced than bats tho?
IDK much about how the bats work, I didnt want to pay for that DLC
I want them to be more modifiable; like for the arboreal let me chose what types of tree populate it so it can fit the time period or let me change the terrarium to grassland or desert or forest.
but I'd assume so based on patreon info
They are porlly very similar
Unless patreon revealed something crazy regarding animal loops
I dont think it is necessarily fair to compare stationary animals like burrowing cockroach to what simosuchus would need
PK is very unlikely to ever add such animals
So PZ system is still good for them. Main complain was always regarding 4x4 size since very few people would actually bother doing something with poison frog. I heard some people out there suggesting same system for cambrian fauna or tiny lizards, which is fair
It could even work for beelzebufo
PZ bats had set loops, right?
Yup
In theory sloth is the most advanced, because it can chose loop
Not like it matters, because it is obviously sloth and doesnt do much
I'd be pretty happy with any kind of loop animations, as long as they aren't static like the lizards & insects are in PZ.
So hard to notice
I think even with inevitable rework in PZ2 these are going to stay static for obvious reason
I am curious as to just how small we can reasonably go
Devs mentioned they would do 4x4 for smaller stuff
I can't imagine anything smaller than like the dung beetle we have rn
How big is the dung beetle?
So probably still something noticable
Yes but 16m^2 is fucking large lol
It looks like only a few cm
If we assume they're based on the largest dung beetles rn, should be like 6-7cm
Eohippus is a desirable vivarium mammal. A prehistoric ancestor of the horse would be perfect for PK.
The golden toad would be a bit smaller than that
And they aren't amazing looking but I think that's for optimization over anything else
And a lot of people say that's too small
Is t Longisquama like 5cm long
Bung Deetle
15-20
It's small but not that small lol
Golden toad would need 1x1
There is good Prague exhibit with 4x4 dimension
Showing how small frogs would be in it
Length or height because wiki is saying 5 cm
I'd love to see a 1x1 or 2x2 for really small stuff but idk if it would really make sense to get something that small
Are you looking at total or body length?
Body
Yeah, wiki says body
It is 3x3 instead
Have we actually found a tail
Still big big
Don't think so
I thought our Longisquama remains are like the whole body
Front half
Pose is outdated