#Community Species Suggestions
1 messages · Page 49 of 1
Best comparison is probably Para v Juxia
Thats some mammal level fucked up teeth
So that's what I'll test
Oh lmfao
Technically it would be possible
Not sure to the extent of falconeri and antiquus tho
But as you said, they have different proportions anyway
I mean, saltwater crocs and Cuban crocs have eggs of the same size AFAIR
Juxia and Paraceratherium have differently sized babies AFAIK
Yeah idk if dinos are good comparison
Tbh falconeri would have great skin potential with different fur lenght
They indeed are
Concrete square is 1m for reference
It is a pretty minimal difference considering the vast difference in adult size
Leaves me very curious if this would really be applicable to falconeri
Especially considering falconeri's proportional differences to basically all the other Palaeoloxodon species
imagining a Juxia being the foster mother of a Paraceratherium calf and still treating it as her baby even when it grows into an adult
NGL, going by how baby giraffes and rhinos go, I'd expect newborn Paraceratherium to be larger
Probably tbh
Baby giraffes are like 1/3rd as large as the parents
In terms of dimensions at least
A half ton baby would be wild lol
Isn't the baby from Indricotherium baby from walking with beasts weighed a quarter of a ton ? , don't know if that accurate
A quarter of a ton is 500lbs
Versus 1000 being a half ton
Not comparable at all lol
Yeah, that too much, lol . But that make me wonder , even baby elephants can only reach 136 kg at max
I could see palaeoloxodon or paraceratherium babies reaching close to a quarter ton
Modern elephant babies already reach over half that
Yeah, one of them will be rank 01 as the biggest terrestrial babies ever
Excluding whales because they were cheating with water. but Damn blue whale babies can reach 3t
Depends on the ton
Juxia
Its pretty obvious that I'm only referring to imperial tons
Dromeosaurus most likely hunted differently and used its wings differently to move around
Once hunting and other similar behaviours are implemented, it would need different animations from utah which weighted like half a ton
True, short tons are the most commonly converted to pounds
I don't think that matters given that younger utahs are going to be similar to older dromeosaurus
I mean doubt babies gonna hunt much, otherwise they would need to account for every baby in the game as well
Adolescents though
The only thing I see being problematic is lack of wing feathers in Utah concept and these are part of rig for animals with them
Would be weird for dromeo to not have them
- that's just for one skin
- that can change over time
- why does it matter if Dromeo has it or not
Only second point is valid
Would that be adolescent?
Unless there will be skin with different rig of course
Which is going to be interesting case
They’re just not similar enough to be alts imo
Is there a particular reason that dromaeo and deinon can't be alts of each other
Also not very similar afawk
I mean, if devs really wanted they could make dromeo-looking growth stage for deinon and then use it as dromeo itself
Leedsichthys is a bit of a classic aquatic even though its not had much attention as of recent
That will probably change soon when PoT releases it
Leedsichthys is good for sure
(If it ever does holy fuck alderon its been so long since we got an aquatic)
Oh true
I completely forgot its coming to that game
Its also in ark, albeit not tameable unfortunately
Looking at this reconstruction I do not like its big blue eyes
Some smaller Ray finned fish would also be nice though, like Xiphactinus and Protosphyraena
For the best cause that thing is fugly
Really just reminds me of this
While I was looking through the artists depictions I found this monstrosity
Quite stunningly its a couple kilometres from my house
Oh I forgot about Heterostius! I love that Half-Life-2-enemy-ass fish
I've seen plenty of Phylogenetic trees including Cau's and Napoli's that place Dromeo and Utah as incredibly close together. More so than say Dromeo and Deinonychus.
Phylogenetic closeness does not guarantee close physical resemblance
cheese table fish
What
The flat dunkle
so much space to put cheese on
Binomen?
Sea pancake
Even if the phylogenetic position was even close to being stable (and eudromaeosaur taxonomy is very unstable) these are two animals separated by more than 50 million years and in very different niches so any perceived closeness would almost certainly be an artifact of the fossil record’s incompleteness
^
Utahraptor's coding as a rule is based on the old material rather than on the Utahraptor project material, Cau himself is certain that its position will shift once the new material is described and thus can be coded
could dimorphodon and caelestiventus be alts of each other?
I'm also skeptical of the AMNH matrix, mostly because Deinonychus and Balaur nested within the Mongolian velociraptorines doesn't really strike me as a reliable result
Dromeosaurus is halfway in time between Utahraptor and the present day, pretty much
Barely any Triassic species. Would be nice to see a few more. Some ideas I could see fitting in pk
- silesaurus
- desmatosuchus
- hererrasaurus
- kannemeyeria
- erythrosuchus
I am partial to Joanna Kobierska's reconstruction of silesaurus
(afaik) dimorphodon was more coastal, and caelestiventus lived in a more arid desert area
so you could really have some fun
Dimorphodon did live along the coast but it was very much a terrestrial animal w no capablity of living in marine environments
the one thing getting in the way of being alts is that they'd probably be vivarium species
which don't seem to have any alts
I kinda forgot about that yeah
but ehh idk about that
they're like just big enough to be large flyers I think, Cael is the largest triassic pterosaur
Dimorphodon is adapted for saltatorial and scansorial locomotion, which is best for vivariums
Caelestiventus is small too
isnt cael a bit bigger though
maybe a bit but it's around the same
yeah
though the only specimen isnt fully grown
Any more of these dinos to add some more for that area.
We aren't sure about what's up with Mononykus for the game; Therizinosaurus and Prenocephale were in the post-release ideas teaser, and I personally find Saurolophus and Tarchia neat potential additions
i’m going to cry if we don’t get mononykus
I'd probably press for Opisthocoelicaudia, if only because having a sauropod would further add to the fact that Nemegt is a rather strange formation, and that one is as far as I can tell the most complete, if missing some key elements.
I think both Saurolophus species would be cool
That is IMO a given
Hell, can even throw Prosaurolophus as an alt for a Dinosaur Park saurolophine as well
Bary will be peak as well
Post-release ideas teaser? Huh?
More smol guys
This:
Which is outdated now, this is the up-to-date one:
Is this an official list or just based on cut creatures?
Official, but outdated
Pretty cool
And the new one is unreadable lol
yep
Some stuff may be the same, some stuff may have changed
That's not true, I can read part of it
But people have Tried to pepe Sylvia it
Third times the charm for figuring out how much Mau needs to blur it
Pffft
I think this one wasn't even blurred and just picked a smaller res lol
The other August 2024 teaser was this, but some stuff got reshuffled, U16 was expanded, but plenty of things are already in now
Note that Diictodon is incorrect
The animals in Update 16 were changed, but I hope they stay the same for Updates Update 18 and 19.
Honestly, I'm looking forward to the addition of Deinosuchus, Ambulocetus, Doedicurus, and Kelenken.
Damn, this is like 80% copium
Small amphibians like Beelzebufo and Diplocaulus will probably appear in the Vivarium at an early stage after EA, but personally I would like to see larger amphibians like Prionosuchus added in the future.
Like, how do you get Allosaurus from that
I'm down.
We knew it was coming and it fits the letter size
^Mau already confirmed Allosaurus was planned flat-out by the time that was released.
Same goes with Stegosaurus and Baryonyx.
You'd be surprised just how dedicated the community is when it comes to deciphering.
I would not
Got damn-near everything nailed down within 2 days tops.
I saw the tinfoil hat thread for the new one lol
Skill issue
Genuinely most are pretty easy to see if you understand how to look at them
And I believe that one was at lower res than the original my bad
That, along with Koolasuchus, Plagiosternum, and Mastodonsaurus ❤️
here's the almost original
Okay I see it now
I'd also love to see some more Early Cretaceous animals added in at some point, with some that come to mind being
- Bajadasaurus
- Amargasaurus
- Minmi
- Nigersaurus
- Concavenator
- Ichthyovenator
- Falcarius
- Hylaeosaurus
- Incisivosaurus
- Tenontosaurus
- Sarcosuchus
- Dalianraptor (Vivarium)
- Hyphalosaurus (Vivarium)
- Jeholornis (Vivarium)
- Sinosauropteryx (Vivarium)
Amargasaurus numero uno sauropodo!!
Can hylaeosaurus realistically even work as an alt of something else
As in
Do we have enough material to not make it a copy of the animal it would be an alt of
Not too sad about it
Probably the reason why it got overshadowed pretty quickly
Falcarius, Conc, Nigersaurus, and Sarcosuchus. Someone get this user a beverage
Polacanthus isn't that great either material wise, but it basically became the british ankylosaur
I remember this depiction being used quite a lot
I think he's cute
Stegosaurus regrowing its plates
Ah, the time Bakker fixated on nodosaurs being stegosaurs...
Wasn’t that widely popular, no?
Not in 1990 I believe
Earlier in the day, to a degree
Thyreophora was erected to hold ceratopsians, ankylosaurs and stegosaurs after all
And Protoceratops first understood as ancestral to ceratopsids and ankylosaurids
Oh shit yeah no
Didn’t know anyone held on that long
If I were to add 5 more animals to this list, what would you guys want?
Well if you're gonna add Conc, ya gotta do pelecanimimus
Ooo that's a good one
Euro Barremian, other than Iggy and Bary, benefits from Hypsi, Conca, Pelecani and Pola
Oh, and Istiodactylus!
Cookiecutter vulture is cool
Borderline Eotyrannus as well, but that's pretty much smaller Yuty at the end of the day
Eotyrannus has a pretty different build and vibe to Yuty I’d say
Folkes disagreed on that I believe
I mean I’m gonna go with the monograph
Idk man these look fairly different to me
One of them is fat
That's how theropods grow tho
whoaa wth didn't realize eotyrannus was a goblin
They don't go isometrically but keep getting fatter as they get larger
Tbf Folke's Eoty is a little different to most older depictions
Repenomamus could also work as an early cretaceous vivarium animal, too 😄
ehh tbh if we get other non tyrannosaurid tyrannosauroids besides yuty, I probably wouldn't want eo, but guanlong is such an aesthetically pleasing animal (also dryptosaurus, and some megaraptorans if you count them)
Honestly R. giganteus could be a non vivarium species
some of the tuffest theropods
Yeah Eotyrannus wouldn’t be my highest priority there
Lanzas was still finding his stride with that one
Anyway
I liked that conca with the brush fin
Guanlong and Yuty are both good picks, they're almost certainly making it in anyway since they were part of the original 50 critters planned for EA
I love this one also
Which we know are still planned to come at some point in the future
oh also concavenator coexisted with pelecanimimus which would be cool in its own right
basal ornithomimosaur with the most teeth of any theropod afaik
And those animals seem to be common across Europe, with Las Hoyas having Wealden taxa, or ornithomimosaur material being known from the Wealden or Germany at that time
The reason none of the others have teeth, he stole them all
tbh if it weren't for the nippers I could see them being free roaming species that just walk around the park
the dontoraptor...
Ok and
Ever been bit by a goose?
Those are derived tyrannosaurids, what is your point
almost but I know it hurts lol
doesn't take a long look to see why
Yeah not pleasant, and the largest ornithimimosaurs would probably feel like Cassowary/Emu/Ostrich nips
But on crack
Pls don't hurt me, Deinocheirus
I'm sorry are you ignoring the fact that the bulkiness, the skull and the the like change with each stage; just like how a Yutyrannus could develop over time
oh I mean definitely not the larger ornithomimids
I'm not ignoring anything
that's like letting an ostrich just run around, dangerous
You're bringing up stuff for no reason
Trust me I know
To be fair it’s possible that the drastic ontogeny is a derived tyrannosaurid trait
pelecanimimus is surprisingly small though
I want to feed it
peafowl appear about that size but these guys have teeth and an extra set of claws
true
It's a plus imo
also probably a piscivore, or more carnivorous leaning omnivore, which is cool
Pelecanimimus would probably be cool to let free roam the same way modern waterfowl get to free roam
The fact that Yutyrannus may have gone through a Eotyrannus like growth stage doesn’t really mean anything and idk why people are arguing about it
Just don't put your hands or anything food-shaped near it
Its a great size and it feels the kind of animal that goes well with a lot of stuff
Their teeth are too scary
Geese
just put up a lot of warning signs
So tightly packed they made a single slicing edge
It's just a goose with more teeth
and yeah I'm pretty sure peafowl have a kill count but some are allowed to roam
Geese don’t have teeth
They have psuedo teeth
That's what they want you to think
Which look shockingly similar to Pelecanimimus teeth actually
Those look scary but aren’t for actually cutting things
That's AI
I think pelly's are more like really really sharp tongs, I don't think they have as many teeth in the back of the jaw
No?
That is not AI lmao
I've seen that exact image for over 10 years now
Long before gen AI
yes dude
Penguins also have something like that
Penguins are arguably worse. Their mouths make them look like hellspawn.
yeah no I have seen em in person, they didn't use them on me thankfully
when you don't have teeth you gotta get creative
I think it's similar to the stuff sea turtles have in their throat?
Not all geese have psuedo teeth ftr
that's more like camels I think
But several do
To mainly keep stuff in
Hyper fucked
Its not just someone's shitty photoshop lol
btw this is a camel skull lol
"friend" in the back, cartoon monster in the front
Tbf I'm familiar with Branta canadensis [Canada goose]
Pretty sure even they have it to a degree
Yeah Camelids are FUCKED
Just much less so
gif so nice you send it twice
Bruh mobile be doing that to me
I get it lol
I'm respecting geese more now
Also the soft palate thing
They really ain't pretty with an open mouth
Got bit by one when I was like 4
Koolasuchus would also make for a really good really crustaceous animal, too
and we're not even talking about pelagornithids
these are true blood takers
I think these guys look cool more than freaky
Seagulls already have a nasty bite
that’s not a tyrannosaur
Turu the Terrible would be proud.
Now imagine one the size of a powered glider
So?
Don't mind pineapple he just likes to argue for no reason
You both kinda do tbh
Anyway we've gone far off topic
nightmare creature
actually CRAZY that they were that big (this size is still correct for sandersi, right??)
Let me review the trello rq
What piscivore are we hoping for in u16?
Aren't all the u16 critters minis?
I'm gunning for Didelphodon.
Didelph would be neat
2 carni 1 insect 1 herbi 1 pisc
We're still supposed to get a mammal mini right?
two funky dinos, one fuzzy Triassic critter, one semi-aquatic mammal, and one arboreal lizard
Then it wouldn't be a true mammal
Mini mammal is also supposed to be really obscure
whatever lizard means
Cause true mammals don't show up til the jurassic
A platypus?
perry the platypus?
Would be weird for Mau to tease it at least twice as something we are never going to guess, but ultimately be something rather popular like didelphodon
I mean Castorocauda lutrasimilis is possible but personally, I'm hoping for Indohyus major
TBH, if the original prediction did turn out to be initially true, then an armadillo is just a strange choice no matter how you slice it.
This animal was definitely not peltephilus
Blur was always strong for this one
I gues mini mammal is going to look like this
Lol
Camels can bite you to death easily
Just looked into Ornithorhynchidae, and none have even a simple shot
Obviously it's Obdurodon
I really hope it’s Didelphodon it’s just a really good animal
I hope it's Indohyus; we don't have any cenozoic minis confirmed
OH FUCK YEAH OPOSSUM
can the mammal mini be this
This why mini mammal, lizard and one of the funky dinos are going to be from cenzoic, trust
Is that an Echidna-Kiwi?
Knuckles before the glow-up
Fun off-topic fact: Echidna is a genus of eels
This animal is pretty big
And is definitely not semi aquatic
wait did they say it was semi-aquatic
murrayglossus hacketti
ohh
anyone else feel like people are too conservative with the crest of dsungaripterus?
is dsungar were added (which I want it because durophagous pterosaur) it should have alts with different levels of crest filling
The terrarium lizard is clearly Obama
Probably no second Scansoriopterygid
Without the crest dsungaripterus looks like a pug
[Derogatory]
If mammal is hard and fast, C. lutrasimilis is off the table
Sure... but then again, we're also not sure that lizard means something from squamata
the mammal is the aquatic ape that humans descended from /j
When nobody was looking, Tyrannotitan chubentensis stole 40 cakes, that's as many as 4 tens, and that's horrible.
Wasn't me this time lol
But it's a fake
This will be my nanuqsaurus
Oh damn
Nah keep prenocephalae
That's a hell of a specimen
To be serious for a moment,
it would end up being a mini most likely if it was considered
Kinda better since at least it might have a chance to be included lol
I will be frank, I would be disappointed if this ended up as a mini, if only because I can think of so many better minis. Then again, PK doesn't do recent finds like Frontier does, so.
I think it's a cute mini
There's apparently also another one from germany that might be a pachy
Stenopelix
Tho it seems more likely its a ceratopsian
Its without skull either way lol
Yeah the lack skull hurts here, but still we don't really find Marginocephalians outside of NA and Asia. The other remains such are non-diagnostic besides Ajkaceratops and well...
Paper also reaches the conclussion of dome growth being completed before body growth, as, well, observed
"Prenocephale had to be born with a dome because we have a domed animal larger than the type skull" was a poor reasoning by Evans et al.
I can't wait for pachycephalosaurs in PK
The ontogeny system is going to make them very fun
I wonder what Zava's dome could possibly imply for later, more popular, pachycephalosaurs........
What exactly does this imply about say H. calathocercos and P. prenes; I don't have time to read the paper.
Wait is it grouping Yinlong outside of Ceratopsia?
Yup; interesting (and with my limited knowledge at that part of the tree, makes more sense than psittacosaurs as earlier diverging ceratopsians), but not the focus of the study; more ceratopsians would likely change the result
Pachycephalosaurus nested within Sphaerotholus makes all the sense as well, those have species across 10 million years; usually Alaskacephale is closer tho
Alaskacephale closer to Preno, and a Homalo+Goyo clade closer to Pachy than Preno and Stego is interesting
So if this tree holds up then S. buchholtzae might be Pachycephalosaurus?
Yeah
I mean Chaoyangsaurid are from the Jurassic, it would kind of make sense they would be out of ceratopsian
Stegoceras outside of Pachycephalosauridae proper too
It isn't
Yes it is?
Node based
Pachycephalosauridae tends to be Stego+Preno+Pachy anyway
where is spinifer
Maybe not enough data
Sole mention in the paper; inside wyomingensis most likely
What
It's a joke
It's also on the first figure
Oh derp
I am reading this right; it seems like most of their phylogentic trees have Yin split from the Pachys after Taco
Mmm, yeah, pachycephalosaurian Chaoyangsaurs in plenty, and not a single one of those follows the topology used in the paper with Yinlong technically not being a marginocephalian
Then again, outgroups
But chaoyangsaurs being close to the ancestral marginocephalian condition is something that wouldn't surprise me
I wouldn't take non-phylogeny based papers to heart too much
As well
But this one IS working on the phylogeny
Not just descriptive, but going down with character scoring
Still, every paper nowadays is expected to come with a phylo tree
while big approaches to phylogenies, without describing material, tend to be more through
n looks the like closest to the topology they ended up using
I guess you could make an argument that because Yin is more basal, it'd be closer to the Pachys than the more derived Taco, which would be split off first depending on what statistical learning they were using and data they used it on, even if it technically is less accurate with regards to phylogeny; maybe if I have time I can go through the data
Long branch attraction and plesiomorphic characters
However, consensus on ceratopsian phylogeny has psittacosaurs as the earliest diverging ceratopsians
Which is odd
I mean a lack of good basal pachycephalosaur material has probably influenced how basal marginocephalians are scored right?
I need me a supersaurus or diplodocus
We all do
Anyone have a breakdown of the 1.0 species we know or think because of the previous roadmap, compared to the current Trello slots?
3 Carnivores
7 Herbivores
2 Insectivores
C1 - Carnotaurus
C2 - Utahraptor
C3 - Kelenken
H1 - Megatherium
H2 - Eremotherium?
H3 - Doedicurus
H4 - Edmontonia
H5 - Other Edmontonia?
H6 - Denversaurus?
H7 - Sauropod??
I1, I2 - idk
The carnivores seem firmly set
I would hope one insectivore is a non-vivarium Mononykus, as it seems to have been cut from the vivariums next update, but it has no real alt potential.
AD many times said eremotherium is not viable
And wouldnt be surprised, if kelenken was one of the animals we got wrong
What makes you say that
Which part?
That Mononykus was cut
I don’t think it fits any category Mau teased
It’s definitely a weird dinosaur
And there’s 2 of those
And there’s an insectivore in the vivarium update
Mau also said Ceratopsians aren’t overdone anymore, so also possible for U19
i would think the insectivore would be the arboreal lizard
Honestly one insectivore might be Megatherium since that was how it was listed in the pre-EA days
Would be weird
There ain’t no way
They’re fucking massive
Fair
I would accept fruitivore because ground sloth were certainly eating a lot of fruit
And we have evidence they at least occasionally scavenged carcasses, probably ate insects too
Obviously one of the insectivores is Thylacosmilus
I guess these are 2 alts for something
Troodontid?
Oh God I hope not
Por Que
Only because I prefer for the name game to be finished
Once the Troodon petition is accepted or rejected, things will settle down a bit.
It’s not but what if it’s Teraterpeton and something else
Thescelosaurus…
I believe this is something popular due to being launch species
PLEASE
Due to EA launch containing “clones,” I do kinda wonder if one is just like Maiasaura and another Pentaceratops or similar
Watch it be 2 new terrarium species
Like game future depends on U19 performance
It has to be something relevant
That people will see during trailer and will want to get PK
Honestly we’re probably sleeping on Europasaurus for U19. It’s already mentioned in game, is basically a Brachiosaurus clone and relates to Mau’s “Crowny’s origin story”.
Deinonychus…
My standard bet is one of new U19 herbis being therizinosaurus
Thatd rule
With crack small species alt as insectivore
Erlikosaurus for the Barlowe shout out
Toxodon or Macrauchenia would be great
True
Edmontonia needs at least its second species
Yeah
Denversaurus would of course be cool but it’s purely formation fodder, like Alcovosaurus.
Too much mixed exhibits potential there
oh fr
I thought the scavenging thing was discredited
So did I
Mylodon scavenged I think?
would be so funny if they actually did this
"aaghh, Sid! Now we gotta find more food!!"
We have direct evidence it occurred at least once
If we get another ceratopsian instead of another stego
I will be completely normal about it mhm
True
My theory is that macrauchenia is one of the u19 herbivores with xenorinotherium as an alt
And both megatherium and doedicurus have none
And edmontonia has 2 alts
I hope we get a megatherium alt
Thyreophoran diversity being underappreciated, but more different frills is always fine 🥀
So is Giraffititan
There are so many species
Who else is there other than eremo
For what exactly
There are many megatherium (or pseudomegatherium) species
For Megatherium? Like nothing
?
Damn how many subgenera does this guy have
The main species is the only one worth anything imo
2
I think I'm missing something
Are they all like the same animals or just different megatherium species
Two have to be longish and shortish fur, and then longish can get a different patterning.
?
In what sense
Different species
there's more than one megatherium species
But only one that matters
In general, I'm pro-alt species, so I wouldn't mind if americanum wasn't the only one
Never really thought about other megatherium species
Ig it could be possible that megatherium is actually occupying 2 other slots
Megatherium americanum is the only one anyone ever talks about because it’s the first named species, the biggest and the only one to survive into the Late Pleistocene - Holocene.
And doedicurus is like the only solo one
Doedicurus is fine as-is
Not sure
Not as confident on my macrauchenia prediction now lol
Not sure what?
Not sure if that's the route they will necessarily go with
I think if one of the species had enough differences with the main one, they would be inclined to add it
I really hope not
I suppose you could make an argument for something like Panochthus
I also really hope not
There's one species that is closest to doedicurus
Imo panocthus doesn't work for multiple reasons
It is shaped very distinctly
I don't think we have much of that one
Again, I don’t see a reason to force these glupshitto alts
Though, you're right. We should get Panocthus instead of Doedicurus.
Yeah
Its also from the miocene so idk how much I trust all the recons that use doedi as a base
I have feelings that edmontonia alts are least likely unless all species have identical osteoderm composition, which would be important due to babes using same models
Idk the actual distinctions tbh
They probably will all have identical osteoderm composition
I don't think we have any differences on the osteoderms numbers
Wait how will Stygimoloch and Pachycephalosaurus have distinct babies?
"The type species, Edmontonia longiceps, is distinguished from E. rugosidens in lacking sideways projecting osteoderms behind the eye sockets; having tooth rows that are less divergent; possessing a more narrow palate; having a sacrum that is wider than long and more robust; and in having shorter spikes at the sides. Also, an ossified cheek plate, known from E. rugosidens specimens, has not been found with Edmontonia longiceps"
They prolly wont? Idk
Stygimoloch needs the Dracorex spiked bab
I mean Tarbosaurus and Tyrannosaurus afaik do have distinctly shaped chicks
Or general position
If they had differences I imagine we wouldn't be able to know without a really great specimen of all 3
I personally think we'll only get E. rugosidens because that's the one pretty much every reconstruction is based on
Hmmm
Idk close enough
The left one is supposed to be Denversaurus
Idk, we have like a lot of herbivore slots and realistically all 3 aren't all that different from eachother so
I do really wish we got Dimetrodon U19
I want Dimetrodon, I also kind of don't want it if it's going to be the only Paelozoic habitat animal
I guess Kelenken will have a similar effect, but a species that everyone likes and really breaks the mould would be great.
The fact we probably won't get any permians
In ea
Maybe thrinaxodon ig
If that's the triassic animal
PK’s current non-avian dinosaur and mammal dichotomy is a little weird imo, especially considering the pre-EA concept art and lists which were far more diverse.
Of course, reality gets in the way of dreams
No vivariums don’t count
For dinosaurs I would say its more or less the same
What if the U19 insectivore is Meganeura…
What else did they have
Would be joyful
Who's the other then
Pulmonoscorpius?
Wouldn't it be a carnivore
They can
Less edmontonia alts means more space for amargasaurus or macrauchenia
I am in
Diplodocus…
Refusing to give edmontonia any alts but add other 2 new herbivores instead would be kinda insane
I hope if they do do one Edmontonia, its the Dinosaur Park species
But I’d prefer both
Denversaurus is again meh. Would make Hell Creek super awesome and diverse tho
That's rugosidens, which is the good one
funny that it held it in its hands
Why?
Megatherium has trackways that show it could walk for extended periods bipedally
It was the largest biped by far since the K-Pg
hopefully with two alts
Diplodocus probably needs at least an alt, yeah. Give me one well-preserved and one massive.
Add Barosaurus and you've got the 5th placer of Morrison
I mean, that's the main reason as to get denversaurus
Thyreophorans have very little rep and I don't see why we couldn't get all 3
Plantigrade animals are always funny with being able to walk bipedally
Yet PK really hasn’t done that before
Allosaurus kinda
Imagine amphicyon doing so
I mean they didn't have
I kinda forgot about that
I mean I know they do have bipedal capabilities but I always assume walking quadrupedally was way easier for them
But they didn’t go out of their way
Denversaurus is a distinct genus
We've got quite a few alts under different genera
But none are out of the way just to fill a digsite
Yeah
But the differences aren't really all that many
Different skull shape, maybe a different gait and smaller spikes
Osteoderms being present on babies from the start would probably pose challange for doing anything alt related with thyreophorans
We will see
I mean, Ugrunaaluk
Eh
They got out of their way to add sinotherium and juxia
And the 2 paraceratherium species
man I hope stego looks good
They placed it as E. sp. when it made made
not that I doubt it will
Not for their digsites though
but I'm just itching for a good stego recon
since so many want to just slap sophie's proportions on an adult and call it a day
Talking about alts is weird, because it is clear devs can add them randomly
My point is, Denversaurus is an entire new genus to add for the sole reason of expanding Hell Creek. Otherwise, no one gives a shit about it.
I am not aware of any new genus alt added purely to fill out a digsite.
That's nitpicky
TTBT, it falling within Edmontonia (or rugosidens as its own genus closer to Denver than to longiceps) is not farfetched
That’s… not a nitpick. It’s an observational statement.
I mean, it's not just a name placed there
As you said it goes well with the other hell creek species
It is basically the same lineage across the Judithian -> Edmontonian -> Lancian faunal stages after all
Like if I could press a button and get Denversaurus, I would, I want a nice diverse Hell Creek, but I don’t think its as likely as many think.
We do have 3 camarasaurs and 3 psittacosaurs tho
I fail why the devs not having done it in the past, indicates they won't do it in future
3 pachyrhinosaurs
It's a good way to add animals
But they’re within a genus
Anything within a genus is fair game
Except Ursus apparently
They have to voice a genus
Extra line or two isn't going to matter
By that logic we shouldn't have Charonosaurus either
Yet we do
Alt genera get bespoke lines, but its usually only 2 instead of the normal 4
Charonosaurus isn’t from a digsite that needs filling out
So what
If anything being on its own is kinda a negative
Cause its got no friends to get the digsite bonus with
(and none really worth including from that formation either)
I do wish we got the third Parasaurolophus species… para deserved 4 skins
Fair actually
Would given them more reason to add stuff from Kirkland like Penta
Para is easily the most iconic hadrosaur tbh
I think it will be these for U19: C1 - Carnotaurus
C2 - Utahraptor
C3 - Kelenken
H1 - Megatherium
H2 - Edmontonia
H3 - Doedicurus
H4 - Macrauchenia
H5 - Maiasaura or Corythosaurus
H6 - Denversaurus
H7 - Diplodocus
I1, I2 - Mononykus & Therizinosaurus
maybe magnicristatus?
Rather just get Cory at that point
Sorry my bad
Given we know that alts of animals already in aren't happening in EA that doesn't make much sense
was giving an option as to why lambeosaurus was on the list
i dont think any dig sites need to be filled out?
I'm aware
It affects challenges by giving more animals to get bonuses with and to be honest, I think a lot of the ecosystem people would like to have as many as possible for one site
HC and Morrison could use 2-3 more tbh
Just because both have lots of good choices
Especially smaller lads
Morrison could use 4
thats fair. but i sort of expect there to be dig sites that wont have more than 1-2 animals just purely of what they offer
not that i can recall directly what dig sites ingame atm that only has 1-2 animals.
wait why
Morrison requires
Ceratosaurus
Diplodocus
Camptosaurus
Ornitholestes
Hell Creek:
Thescelosaurus
Anzu
Pachycephalosaurus (technically not confirmed)
Leptoceratops
That's fine, though I think the animal has to be exceptional to have a digsite all its own like Carno or Amarga
what's so hard about including Eremotherium versus any other sloth?
Ornithomimus and Torosaurus would be cool
or Mutta
Nanotyrannus when it’s confirmed distinct is honestly also a requirement. It has extremely good remains, is well known and probably taxonomically distinct.
as a megatherium alt
It has less fingers than Megatherium
ah
Sloths love to lose fingers
well I still hope we at least get more than 1 giant ground sloth
Real Duonychus situation
Ornitho and Struthio as alts.......
Kayenta, Cloverly, Wapiti, Horseshoe Canyon, Chinle, Kaiparowitz, Lujan, La Brea, Huincul, Kem Kem, Elrhaz, Wessex, Lourinha, Charmouth Mudstone, Yamal, Kozhamzhar, Ilek, Vilyuy, Yuliangze, Yixian, Shara Murun, Hsanda Gol, Dushihin, Jiufotang, Altmuhltal, Chitarwata, Mackunda, Eumeralla, Lowenstein, Trossingen
all have 1 or 2 animals currently
Yeah, though I think most Australia animals can get a pass
Struthio is more a Galli thing, no?
Nope
Heck both could be an alt to Galli
NA ornithomimids are a bit of a mess tho
Still S. altus and O. edmontoicus are my go tos
What formation would Struthiomimus go in?
apparently there was a deinocheirid living in late cretaceous NA iirc
Eh
Dinosaur Park
Sites with more than two animals ingame:
Djadochta
Nemegt
Hell Creek
Dinosaur Park
Prince Creek
Morrison
Tokod```
(Not counting S. sedens because it's a mess)
*Oldman Formation
OldMan formation?
Yeah
Why edmontoicus over velox?
More complete
It has a better skeleton tbf
Meh
moment
The other Ornithomimus is from Horseshoe Canyon Formation
Dinosaur Provincial Park
This vivarium system has me thinking that aquariums might be possible way down the line 👀
there's a lot of overlap in species between the two even if we haven't found it in Dinosaur Park specifically
Are they even outwardly different?
Small ones may be possible as a start
No idea on the big ones
Who cares?
was it semi aquatic?
Wiki says DPP anyway so
yes that's why I'm suggesting it
I don't think that's semi-aquatic
If anyone here has played Megaquarium, aquariums in PK could draw some inspiration from how the tanks from that game could function
it's been proposed to be
No point in alt if there isn't a difference outwardly
some researches have proposed such
Tell that to Camarasaurus
i am being very normal
I just checked Paelodb and they list it in DPP, but who knows
Like there is a size distinction at the very least, but I thought you defended adding digsite species?
Yeah the alts that have been in since before the alts were made drastically different
Plateosaurus?
You could say Pachyrhino
have decent differences beyound size
Literally "the most 11th hour addition" according to Mau, I don't think that really counts
It wasn't planned til the last month or two prior to the update
Is anything?
For U19 did we get a new roadmap? I thought there were only 6 species planned for update 19?
Most predictions being Carnotaurus, Utahraptor, Diplodocus, Megatherium, Doedicurus, and Kelenken
Oh I thought it was just U17 that got increased
nope, both at the same time
I'm curious what ya'lls top 5 most wanted (not necessarily most likely) vivarium critters for each type is
So 15 total
Type as in air, land and water?
Yes, Arboreal, Terrestrial, and Amphibious
Who the hell said diplodocus?
It’s on the post ea ideas list I never saw anyone gues it for U20
I always heard that list plus kelenken
Or wait edmontonia
Does recently extinct count?
Sure why not
Idk, I got this
Aerial/Arboreal:
Meganeura
Jeholornis
Anurognathus
Pterodactylus
Ichthyornis
Terrestrial:
Arthropleura
Pulmonoscorpius
Sinosauropteryx
Amphibious:
Didelphodon
I guess a Heterodontosaur would count
Amphibious is pretty niche for that size range
I guess that Yixian mammal could be the third terrestrial, or Leptictidium
Mine would probably be:
-
Arboreal
Suminia
Darwinius
Meganeura (assuming it goes here, dunno why it wouldn't?)
Drepanosaurus
Avisaurus -
Terrestrial
Diictodon
Skybalonyx
Heterodontosaurus
Arthropluera
Ceratogaulus -
Amphibious
Titanoboa
Didelphodon
Castorocauda
Beelzebufo
Diplocaulus
I kinda want to wait on Drepanosaurus until it’s thing is figured out
I don't really see why even the big snakes would be in the vivariums
Unless theres a limitation I am not aware of
There are like a ridiculous amount of options for any of these categories lol
Animations for snakes are like ridiculously hard
I like him
Bro is a metatarsal or similar
Not really sure, but can you really say the same thing about eels?
I don’t even recognise it tbh
Just amusing
What do eels have to do with anything?
The animations n such
Digging adapted drepanosaur from Chinle
Ok but there aren't any eels in the game so what is the point in comparison here?
Thats the thing
Skybalonyx is poor and I definitely disagree with it as a top 5, but at least it’s got a bit more going on
I take it those water snakes would be a similar case to the usual snakes?
Or whatever they are called
I just like skybalonyx as an animal
Do I think its likely? No not really
*claw and poop
what
But if the world were my oyster
Wait actually that raises a question when I mention Eels
Are there any prehistoric ones, or just eel-like fish or something?
Ngl I do remember Skybalonyx being more than just a claw
So you got me there
Still a fun concept that can be played with in a vivarium setting
It’s a cool claw tho
I’ll give you that
But I definitely think we have a quadrillion better choices with less guess work first
Alright theres A eel thats said to be an ancestor, or at least thats just how its named
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anguillavus
Anguillavus (Latin for "eel ancestor") is an extinct genus of basal marine eel that lived during the Late Cretaceous (upper Cenomanian) of Lebanon, where it is known from the Sannine Formation.
It is the only known member of the family Anguillavidae. Its primitive nature compared to extant eels is indicated by it still retaining its pelvic fins,...
And then theres one from the Early Eocene
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolcyrus
Bolcyrus is an extinct genus of prehistoric marine eel that lived during the Early Eocene. It was a member of the family Congridae, which also contains modern conger eels.
It contains two species:
Bolcyrus bajai Blot, 1978 – Late Ypresian of Italy (Monte Bolca)
Bolcyrus formosissimus (Eastman, 1905) – Late Ypresian of Italy and possibly ear...
Just two marine eels so far, huh?
The question is, which of those eels would have the highest chance of getting into the game as a vivarium animal or an aquarium critter?
Yeah fs
I'm simply a fan of Drepanosaurs and the more we can get with as much variation as possible the better I say
Arboreal
- Dimorphodon macronyx
- Drepanosaurus unguicaudatus
- Suminia getmanovi
- Avisaurus darwini
- Diplobune minor
Terrestrial - Heterodontosaurus tucki
- Araripesuchus tsangatsangana
- Venetoraptor gassenae
- Ceratogaulus hatcheri
- Madtsoia madagascarensis
Semiaquatic - Didelphodon vorax
- Mesosaurus tenuidens
- Presbyornis pervetus
- Arthropleura sp.
- Pleurosaurus goldfussi
animating those things is very hard and they're not gonna move around much anyway
Arboreal
Anurognathus (or any anurognathid, really)
Passenger Pigeon
Meganeura
Any Enanthiornithe
Pterodactylus (or basically any small enough jurassic pterosaur that isnt an anurognathid (see above)
Terrestrial
Arthropleura
Lystrosaurus
Nurulagus
Mekosuchus
Repenomamus
Semiaquatic
Didelphodon
Diplocalus
Titanoboa
Hibberopterus
idk
I genuinely could not think of another semiaquatic
Yeah the amphibious ones are surprisingly hard to come up with?
really?
For RE, passenger pigeon, Carolina parakeet, ivory-billed woodpecker, that giant gecko, Mekosuchus
Diplobune is a very interesting pick
I like it
Would Beelzebufo be in the aquatic vivarium or terrestrial vivarium?
I feel like either would be a reasonable interpretation of its ecology
Uh, good question actually
Amphibious imo
I'd say it also depends how much water is in the different vivariums
Even if it's not spending a ton of time in the water it still had to keep its skin somewhat moist like any modern frog/toad
mhm
if there's a small pond or dish in the terrestrial one it could be feasible for a more terrestrial frog
I imagine that if kept in a zoo it would probably be kept similar to how they keep pacman frogs
which iirc is usually in an albeit moist environment, but it usually lacks like
a pool large enough to swim in
not sure though, dont quote me on that
I would personally go with terrestrial
especially if it has like a little tiny pond in it as said above
I mean it was in a dry area so maybe it'd be more likely to live in ponds than on land
So remind me again, vivariums arent gonna have that naturalistic option at all, are they?
I heard Mau say something about it or something related not being possible
actually thats a really good point
a null variant without the walls
like most desert frogs live in mud or oases dont they
it'll be possible but they arent designing around it
but idk if they will come with the old presets that the mini aviaries had or an equivalent
Could in theory be kept in either really
yeah
probably will just have to use modular stuff to decorate manually
including or not including species that are almost guaranteed to show up?
really hope they add equivalents to the birdhouses there used to be tho, those were fire
Here are some vivarium animals that come to my mind!
Arboreal
- Coelurosauravus
- Dalianraptor
- Mirasaura
Terrestrial
- Drepanosaurus
Amphibious
- Plagiosternum
- Uruyiella
- Hyphalosaurus
drepanosaurus as a terrestrial is a new one
havent seen that before
Looks like all of Beelzebufo's potential modern relatives live in fairly wet environments so idk how much that helps
wasnt it like solidly a climbavore?
wtf why did I just say climbavore
Dalianraptor is dubious
lmao
I mean aboreal
But it's definitely a not a toad so it would need to be more wet than toads
probably a chimera
it eats the metaphysical concept of climb
Mmm yummy climb
Like chainsaw man
True!
Anyway yes Drepanosaurs were almost entirely arboreal
Except for Skybalonyx
does its widdle stomach get filled up every time something near it climbs a wall
Who opted to become mole
@silver steeple did u see my question?
Would some of those Rhynchocephalia be interesting enough to add into the game?
Yeah I know theres only one member left, that being of the Tuatara, but why not some extinct Rhynchocephalians, those little reptiles that resemble lizards but arent lizards
yeah theres actually quite a few I think could work
for a fairly basic one, Clevosaurus is essentially as generic as you can get
triassic-jurassic in age
Yeah anything not explicitly confirmed is free game
I included one, Pleurosaurus
Like what makes something a vivarium animal?
no like which terrarium animals are confirmed to be coming that havent been properly announced yet
all of them that are confirmed have been properly announced iirc
that being Compsognathus, Yi, Simosuchus, and Tiktaalik
oh I assumed that like, blurry list included some
Simosuchus
Compsognathus
Tiktaalik
Yi
A semiaquatic mammal
2 weird dinosaurs
an arboreal lizardy thing
fuzzy triassic critter
wait do we think a terrarium would be able to include Arthropleura AND Meganeura or would they need to be separated
Need to be seperate
also important to add, iirc one of these have been seen by the patreon people already?
I forgor
Terrariums can only have one kind of animal
shame but makes sense
especially to allow for a wide variety of species
While we're at it with Temnospondyl amphibians, why not the flat porcupine?
Yeah I did it again
oh speaking of, they posted this picture on the patreon page, looking exciting!
I hope to one day get the patreon, but even these free blurry images get me excited
yes he is good
(yes, I am that much of a PK stan that I look at the blurred patreon images)
the full image is even more exciting, it shows some really neat features
Carboniferous critter but VERY VERY late carboniferous or something
I believe it
But not enough to pay for it shame
jk
platy is permian
I really wanted to buy crowny plushy too but they were already sold out by the time I was gonna preorder mine lmao
Well they have a carboniferous record, even if its, from what I heard someone say, the LATEST Carboniferous
im happy about that tho because selling out super quick is a good sign
its both
Essentially its a Lystrosaurus case, a generally permian animal but has a Triassic record
its from Culter i checked which is boundary yeah
or an ammonite case with paleocene ammonites
I forgot about that shit how tf did that happen
Arboreal: Darwinius, Suminia, Confuciusornis, Drepanosaurus, Meganeura Terrestrial: Sinosauropteryx, Leptictidium, Arthropleura, Heterodontosaurus, Dimetrodon (natalis/teutonis) Amphibious: Diplocaulus, Beelzebufo, Titanoboa, Mesosaurus, Didelphodon
reworking
Y'know I do wonder which vivarium Platyhystrix would fit into
i would love D minimus as a exibit
A tiny dimetrodon as a vivarium with big dimetrodon as a full exhibit is a hill I will die upon
would be so damn cool
frog
yeah especially since teutonis is an alpine species
short awnser: extinction debt, also known as survival without recovery; possibly reworking (but theres fairly decent evidence it wasnt, seeing as these ammonites has been found in multiple places around the globe in danian deposits and studies have shown no evidence of reworking)
long awnser: basically sometimes ecosystems have a delayed collapse after mass extinction events, resulting in certain species persisiting beyond the initial extinction but then dying out a few hundred thousand years later (at least in the ammonite's case), but it also occurs in modern times, as an example, a butterfly species could be entirely dependent on a single species of plant, and the plant is removed from the area entirely, the butterfly population is essentially screwed
as for the specie specifically that most likely persisted, they were Hoploscaphites, Scaphites, and Baculites, with Hoploscaphites having the most evidence of the three
either way, all three died out at the latest roughly 300,000 years after the KPG
In ecology, extinction debt is the future extinction of species due to events in the past. The phrases dead clade walking and survival without recovery express the same idea.
Extinction debt occurs because of time delays between impacts on a species, such as destruction of habitat, and the species' ultimate disappearance. For instance, long-live...
The term Paleocene ammonites describes families or genera of Ammonoidea that may have survived the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, which occurred 66.043 million years ago. Although almost all evidence indicated that ammonites did not survive past the K–Pg boundary, there is some scattered evidence that some ammonites lived for a shor...
Alright now I wanna know what other carboniferous non-arthropod critters were around on land
ophiacodon
in the later carboniferous there was a lot more
petrolacosaurus, hylonomus, Acleistorhinids
edaphosaurus, sphenacodonts, the earliest true reptiles like Hylonomus
Perderpes may have been the earliest tetrapod capable of actually somewhat ok land movement and it was carboniferous
yeah edapho
early carboniferous at that
yeah edapho is actually predominantly carboniferous iirc
a lot of the early permian creatures had already evolved in the carboniferous
ok its not
but it still has a decent carboniferous record
dimetro is surprising in that it doesnt have a Carboniferous record
but I think other sphenacodonts do
Arthopluera makes it to the permian
And all the stuff found are just critters that sorta resemble Dimetrodon in a sense but are not the same
they do
though this was post-rainforest collapse
last 10 million or so years of the carboniferous they were around
have I sent Spheacodont size chart yet?
not that I've seen
still a wip
Well there is Spheacodon itself
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphenacodon
I was looking up Spheacodont and it gave me this guy
Sphenacodon (meaning "wedge point tooth") is an extinct genus of synapsid that lived from about 300 to about 280 million years ago (Ma) during the Late Carboniferous and Early Permian periods. Like the closely related Dimetrodon, Sphenacodon was a carnivorous member of the Eupelycosauria family Sphenacodontidae. However, Sphenacodon had a low cr...
Is this an ancestor or something else?
Secodontosaurus is so weird
basal member
looks good
mabye, I know there's some debate over internal systematics wrt Secodontosaurus and Sphenacodon
ty current trying to figure out how Angelensis works
Are there ANY Mesozoic Mammals that WOULDNT be in a Vivarium?
Repenomamus giganteus could work outside of one IMO
Theres also Juramaia to consider, even then no one talks about that one
Patagomaia too if we knew what it was
Whoops
its tiny